Preprint
Short Note

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Ultrametric Bourgain-Figiel-Milman, Enflo Type and Mendel-Naor Cotype Problems

Submitted:

08 April 2026

Posted:

09 April 2026

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
We ask for ultrametric version of following three: (1) Bourgain-Figiel-Milman Theorem, (2) Enflo Type, (3) Mendel-Naor Cotype.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  

1. Ultrametric Bourgain-Figiel-Milman Problem

Let X and Y be finite dimensional normed linear spaces such that dim ( X ) = dim ( Y ) . The Banach-Mazur distance between X and Y is defined as
d B M ( X , Y ) inf { T T 1 : T : X Y is invertible linear operator } .
For n N , let ( R n , · , · ) be the standard Euclidean Hilbert space. Following wonderful result says that every finite dimensional Banach space has a subspace which is close (in the Banach-Mazur distance) to the Euclidean space.
Theorem 1. 
[1,6](Dvoretzky-Milman Theorem)  There is a universal constant C > 0 satisfying the following property: If X is any n-dimensional real Banach space and 0 < ε < 1 3 , then for every natural number
k C ε 2 | log ε | log n ,
there exists a k-dimensional Banach subspace Y of X such that
d B M ( Y , ( R k , · , · ) ) < 1 + ε .
We refer
f Lip sup d ( f ( x ) , f ( y ) ) d ( x , y ) : x , y M , x y .
The Bourgain-Figiel-Milman distance between M and N is defined as
d B F M ( M , N ) inf { f Lip f 1 Lip : f : M N is injective } .
In 1986, Bourgain, Figiel and Milman proved the following nonlinear Dvoretzky theorem [3].
Theorem 2. 
[3] (Bourgain-Figiel-Milman Theorem) For every ε > 0 , there is a universal constant C ( ε ) > 0 satisfying the following: Every finite metric space M contains a subset N satisfying following conditions.
(i)
There is an injective map f : N 2 ( N , R ) such that
d B F M ( N , f ( N ) ) 1 + ε .
(ii)
o ( N ) C ( ε ) log ( o ( M ) ) .
Further, following holds: If ε < 1 , then we can take
C ( ε ) = c 1 ε log ( c 2 ε ) for some c 1 > 0 , c 2 > 0 .
We will formulate problem based on Theorem 2 to ultrametric spaces.
Definition 1. 
[33] Let M be a set. A map d : M × M [ 0 , ) is said to be an  ultrametricif it satisfies following conditions.
(i)
d ( z , z ) = 0 for all z M . If x , y M are such that d ( x , y ) = 0 , then x = y .
(ii)
d ( x , y ) = d ( y , x ) for all x , y M .
(iii)
d ( x , y ) max { d ( x , z ) , d ( z , y ) } for all x , y , z M .
In this case, ( M , d ) is called as an ultrametric space .
Let K be a non-Archimedean valued field. We define
c 0 ( N , K ) { a n } n : a n K , n N , lim n a n = 0
equipped with the ultra-norm
{ a n } n max n N | a n | , { a n } n c 0 ( N , K )
and the p-adic inner product
{ a n } n , { b n } n n = 1 a n b n , { a n } n , { b n } n c 0 ( N , K ) .
Then c 0 ( N , K ) is a non-Archimedean Banach space which is also a p-adic Hilbert space [17,29]. We now ask for ultrametric version of Bourgain-Figiel-Milman theorem.
Problem 1.(Ultrametric Bourgain-Figiel-Milman Problem) K be a non-Archimedean valued field. For every ε > 0 , whether there is a universal constant C ( ε , K ) > 0 satisfying the following: Every finite ultrametric space M contains a subset N satisfying following conditions.
(i)
There is an injective map f : N c 0 ( N , K ) such that
d B F M ( N , f ( N ) ) 1 + ε .
(ii)
o ( N ) C ( ε , A ) log ( o ( M ) ) .

2. Ultrametric Enflo Type and Mendel-Naor Cotype Problems

Let H be a Hilbert space, n N . Recall that for any n points h 1 , , h n H , we have
1 2 n ε 1 , , ε n { 1 , 1 } j = 1 n ε j h j 2 = j = 1 n h j 2 .
Equality (1) motivated the definition of Type and Cotype for Banach spaces.
Definition 2. 
[1] Let 1 p 2 . A Banach space X is said to be of(Rademacher) Type pif there exists T p ( X ) > 0 such that
1 2 n ε 1 , , ε n { 1 , 1 } j = 1 n ε j x j p 1 p T p ( X ) j = 1 n x j p 1 p , x 1 , , x n X , n N .
Definition 3. 
[1] Let 2 q < . A Banach space X is said to be of(Rademacher) Cotype qif there exists C q ( X ) > 0 such that
j = 1 n x j q 1 q C q ( X ) 1 2 n ε 1 , , ε n { 1 , 1 } j = 1 n ε j x j q 1 q , x 1 , , x n X , n N .
There is a vast literature on Type-Cotype of Banach spaces, see [1,5,14,15,16,19,20,21,24,35].
In 1970, Enflo introduced the notion of Type for metric spaces [7,25].
Definition 4. 
[7,25] Let p > 0 . A metric space ( M , d ) is said to be of Enflo Type p if there exists E p ( M ) > 0 satisfying following conditions: For every n N and for every f : { 1 , 1 } n M it holds
1 2 n ε 1 , , ε n { 1 , 1 } d ( f ( ε 1 , , ε n ) , d ( ε 1 , , ε n ) ) p 1 p E p ( M ) j = 1 n 1 2 n ε 1 , , ε n { 1 , 1 } d ( f ( ε 1 , , ε j 1 , ε j , ε j + 1 , , ε n ) , d ( ε 1 , , ε j 1 , ε j , ε j + 1 , , ε n ) ) p 1 p .
In 2008, Mendel and Naor introduced the notion of Cotype for metric spaces [25].
Definition 5. 
[25] Let q > 0 . A metric space ( M , d ) is said to be of Mendel-Naor Cotype q if there exists Γ q ( M ) > 0 satisfying following conditions: For every n N , there exists an even integer m N such that for every f : Z m n M it holds
j = 1 n 1 m n x Z m n d f x + m 2 e j , f ( x ) q Γ q ( M ) q m q 1 m n x Z m n 1 3 n ε { 1 , 0 , 1 } n d ( f ( x + ε ) , f ( x ) ) q , ε = ( ε 1 , , ε n ) ,
where { e j } j = 1 n is the standard basis for R n .
We now ask for ultrametric versions of Enflo Type and Mendel-Naor Cotype.
Problem 2.  (Ultrametric Enflo Type Problem)  Whether there is a way to define ultrametric Enflo Type?
Problem 3.  (Ultrametric Mendel-Naor Cotype Problem)  Whether there is a way to define ultrametric Mendel-Naor Cotype?
Note that there are also notions of Type for metric spaces by Bourgain, Milman and Wolfson [4] and by Ball [2]. These lead to following problems.
Problem 4.  (Ultrametric Bourgain-Milman-Wolfson Type Problem)  Whether there is a way to define ultrametric Bourgain-Milman-Wolfson Type?
Problem 5.  (Ultrametric Markov/Ball Type Problem)  Whether there is a way to define ultrametric Markov/Ball Type?
Remark 1. 
In 2026, we formulated non-Archimedean John, non-Archimedean Dvoretzky-Milman, non-Archimedean Type-Cotype and non-Archimedean Kwapien problems which are still open [18].

References

  1. Albiac, Fernando; Kalton, Nigel J. Topics in Banach space theory. In Graduate Texts in Mathematics; Springer: [Cham], 2016; volume 233. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ball, K. Markov chains, Riesz transforms and Lipschitz maps. Geom. Funct. Anal. 1992, 2, 137–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bourgain, J.; Figiel, T.; Milman, V. On Hilbertian subsets of finite metric spaces. Isr. J. Math. 1986, 55, 147–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bourgain, J.; Milman, V.; Wolfson, H. On type of metric spaces. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 1986, 294, 295–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Diestel, Joe; Jarchow, Hans; Tonge, Andrew. Absolutely summing operators. In Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1995; volume 43. [Google Scholar]
  6. Dvoretzky, Aryeh. Some results on convex bodies and Banach spaces. In Proc. Internat. Sympos. Linear Spaces (Jerusalem; Jerusalem Academic Press: Jerusalem; Pergamon: Oxford, 1960; pp. pages 123–160. [Google Scholar]
  7. Enflo, Per. On the nonexistence of uniform homeomorphisms between Lp-spaces. Ark. Mat. 1970, 8, 103–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Figiel, T. Some remarks on Dvoretzky’s theorem on almost spherical sections of convex bodies. Colloq. Math. 1971, 24, 241–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Figiel, T. A short proof of Dvoretzky’s theorem. In Séminaire Maurey-Schwartz 1974–1975: Espaces Lp, applications radonifiantes et géométrie des espaces de Banach, Exp. No. XXIII, pages 6 pp. (erratum, p. 3). 1975. [Google Scholar]
  10. Figiel, T. A short proof of Dvoretzky’s theorem on almost spherical sections of convex bodies. Compos. Math. 1976, 33, 297–301. [Google Scholar]
  11. Figiel, T.; Lindenstrauss, J.; Milman, V. D. The dimension of almost spherical sections of convex bodies. Acta Math. 1977, 139, 53–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gordon, Y.; Guedon, O.; Meyer, M. An isomorphic Dvoretzky’s theorem for convex bodies. Stud. Math. 1998, 127, 191–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gordon, Yehoram. Gaussian processes and almost spherical sections of convex bodies. Ann. Probab. 1988, 16, 180–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ivanisvili, Paata; van Handel, Ramon; Volberg, Alexander. Rademacher type and Enflo type coincide. Ann. Math. 2020, 192, 665–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Handbook of the geometry of Banach spaces; Johnson, W. B., Lindenstrauss, J., Eds.; North-Holland Publishing Co.: Amsterdam, 2001; Vol. I. [Google Scholar]
  16. Handbook of the geometry of Banach spaces; Johnson, W. B., Lindenstrauss, J., Eds.; North-Holland: Amsterdam, 2003; Vol. 2. [Google Scholar]
  17. Kalisch, G. K. On p-adic Hilbert spaces. Ann. Math. 1947, 48, 180–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Krishna, K. Mahesh. Non-Archimedean John, non-Archimedean Dvoretzky-Milman, non-Archimedean type-cotype and non-Archimedean Kwapien problems. 2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Latala, Rafal; Oleszkiewicz, Krzysztof. On the best constant in the Khinchin-Kahane inequality. Stud. Math. 1994, 109, 101–104. [Google Scholar]
  20. Li, Daniel; Queffelec, Herve. Introduction to Banach spaces: Analysis and probability; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2018; Vol. 1. [Google Scholar]
  21. Li, Daniel; Queffelec, Herve. Introduction to Banach spaces: Analysis and probability; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2018; Vol. 2. [Google Scholar]
  22. Matousek, J. Lectures on discrete geometry. In Graduate Texts in Mathematics; Springer-Verlag: New York, 2002; volume 212. [Google Scholar]
  23. Matsak, Ivan; Plichko, Anatolij. Dvoretzky’s theorem by Gaussian method. In Functional analysis and its applications; Elsevier Sci. B. V.: Amsterdam, 2004; volume 197, pp. pages 171–184. [Google Scholar]
  24. Maurey, Bernard. Type, cotype and K-convexity. In Handbook of the geometry of Banach spaces; North-Holland: Amsterdam, 2003; Volume 2, pp. pages 1299–1332. [Google Scholar]
  25. Mendel, Manor; Naor, Assaf. Metric cotype. Ann. Math. (2) 2008, 168, 247–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Milman, V. Dvoretzky’s theorem—thirty years later. Geom. Funct. Anal. 1992, 2, 455–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Milman, V. D. A new proof of A. Dvoretzky’s theorem on cross-sections of convex bodies. Funkc. Anal. I Priložen. 1971, 5, 28–37. [Google Scholar]
  28. Milman, Vitali D.; Schechtman, Gideon. Asymptotic theory of finite-dimensional normed spaces. In Lecture Notes in Mathematics; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1986; volume 1200. [Google Scholar]
  29. Perez-Garcia, C.; Schikhof, W. H. Locally convex spaces over non-Archimedean valued fields. In Camb. Stud. Adv. Math.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2010; volume 119. [Google Scholar]
  30. Pisier, Gilles. Probabilistic methods in the geometry of Banach spaces. In Probability and analysis (Varenna, 1985); Springer: Berlin, 1986; volume 1206, pp. pages 167–241. [Google Scholar]
  31. Pisier, Gilles. The volume of convex bodies and Banach space geometry. In Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1989; volume 94. [Google Scholar]
  32. Schechtman, Gideon. A remark concerning the dependence on ϵ in Dvoretzky’s theorem. In Geometric aspects of functional analysis (1987–88); Springer: Berlin, 1989; volume 1376, pp. pages 274–277. [Google Scholar]
  33. Schikhof, W. H. Ultrametric calculus. An introduction to p-adic analysis. In Camb. Stud. Adv. Math.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2006; volume 4. [Google Scholar]
  34. Szankowski, Andrzej. On Dvoretzky’s theorem on almost spherical sections of convex bodies. Isr. J. Math. 1974, 17, 325–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Szarek, S. J. On the best constants in the Khinchin inequality. Stud. Math. 1976, 58, 197–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2026 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated