Submitted:
19 March 2026
Posted:
19 March 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Results
2.1. Characteristics of the Granulometric Composition of Metallurgical Slags
3. Discussion
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Sampling and Sample Preparation of Metallurgical Slags
4.2. Slag Granulometric Analysis
4.3. Elemental Analysis of Slags
4.4. Chemical Leaching of Slags and Elemental Analysis of Leachates
4.5. Soil Sampling and Sample Preparation
4.6. Determining the Laboratory Germination of Zea mays L. Seeds.
4.7. Elemental Analysis of Zea mays L. Plant Organs.
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| MPP | Mining and Processing Plant |
| ICP-MS | Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer |
| MAC | Maximum allowable concentration |
| TC | Translocation coefficient |
References
- Spooren, J.; Binnemans, K.; Björkmalm, J.; Breemersch, K.; Dams, Y.; Folens, K.; González- Moya, M.; Horckmans, L.; Komnitsas, K.; Kurylak, W.; Lopez, M.; Mäkinen, K.; Onisei, S.; Oorts, K.; Peys, A.; Pietek, G.; Pontikes, Y.; Snellings, R.; Tripiana, M.; Variad, J.; Willquist, K.; Yurramendi, L.; Kinnunen, P. Near-zero-waste processing of low-grade, complex primary ores and secondary raw materials in Europe: Technology development trends. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 2020, 155, 104919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jin, Z.; Liu, T.; Yang, Y.; Jackson, D. Leaching of cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, and zinc from two slag dumps with differernt environmental exposure periods under dynamic acidic condition. Ecotoxicology and Enviromental Safety 2014, 104, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Piatak, N. M.; Parsons, M.B.; Seal, R.R. Characteristics and environmental aspects of slag: A review. Applied Geochemistry 2015, 57, 236–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duczmal-Czernikiewicz, A; Baibatsha, A; Bekbotayeva, A; Omarova, G; Baisalova, A. Ore Minerals and Metal Distribution in Tailings of Sediment-Hosted Stratiform Copper Deposits from Poland and Kazakhstan. Minerals 2021, 11(7), 752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- TransformNation. Chapter 2. Analysis of the current situation in Kazakhstan. TransforNation. 2024. Available online: https://transfornation.kz/tpost/oczcbs0jb1-glava-2-analiz-tekuschei-situatsii-v-kaz (accessed on 6 March 2026).
- Abilda, Z.; Daurov, D.; Daurova, A.; Zhapar, K.; Sapakhova, Z.; Zhambakin, K.; Shamekova, M. Construction of a geoecological map of dust particles transfer from the surface of the shymkent lead (plumbum) factory dump. Eurasian Journal of Ecology 2023, 74(1), 4–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiaqing, Z.; Luo, X.; Cheng, Y.; Ke, W.; Hartley, W.; Li, Ch.; Jiang, J.; Zhu, F.; Xue, Sh. Spatial distribution of toxic metal (loid)s at an abandoned zinc smelting site, Southern China. Journal of Hazardous Materials 425 2022, 127970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X; Zhang, C; Yu, H; Qian, G; Zheng, X; Zhou, H; Huang, L; Zhang, F; Zhong, Y. Research on the Properties of Steel Slag with Different Preparation Processes. Materials 2024, 17(7), 1555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gabasiane, TS; Danha, G; Mamvura, TA; Mashifana, T; Dzinomwa, G. Environmental and Socioeconomic Impact of Copper Slag—A Review. Crystals 2021, 11(12), 1504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du, C.; Gao, X.; Kitamura, Sy. Measures to Decrease and Utilize Steelmaking Slag. J. Sustain. Metall 2019, 5, 141–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Talodhikar, V.P. Study of iron and steel slag as a product with respect to physical-chemical properties. IJAET 2016, 7(3), 224–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pan, D.; Li, L.; Tian, X.; Wu, Y.; Cheng, N.; Yu, H. A review on lead slag generation, characteristics. and utilization. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 2019, 146, 140–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsakiridis, P.E. Aluminium salt slag characterization and utilization – a revew. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2012, 217-218, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sariev, O.; Kelamanov, B.; Dossekenov, M.; Davletova, A.; Kuatbay, Y.; Zhuniskaliev, T.; Abdirashit, A.; Gasik, M. Environ mental characterization of ferrochromium production waste (refined slag) and its carbonization product. Helion 2024, 10(9), e30789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- SMM. Lead and Zinc Summit: Hematite process – the best choice for the reduction of soplid waste from zinc smelting and the new technology of resource utilization. Metal New (SMM). 2020. Available online: https://news.metal.com/newscontent/101218816/lead-and-Zinc-Summit-Hematite-process-the-best-choice-for-the-reduction-of-solid-waste-from-zinc-smelting-and-the-new-technology-of-resource-utilization.
- Madheswaran, C.K.; Ambily, P.S.; Dattatreya, J.K.; et al. Studies on use of Copper Slag as Replacement Material for River Sand in Building Constructions. J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. A. 2014, 95, 169–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gorai, B.; Jana, R.K. Characteristics and utilisation of copper slag—a review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 2003, 39(4), 299–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, P; Zhao, Y; Zhang, N; Wang, Y; Zhang, J; Zhang, Y; Liu, X. Structural Characteristics and Cementitious Behavior of Magnesium Slag in Comparison with Granulated Blast Furnace Slag. Materials 2024, 17(2), 360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, G.; Wang, N.; Chen, M.; Cheng, Y. Recycling nikel slag by aluminum dross: Iron – extraction and secondary slag stabilization. ISIJ International 2020, 60(3), 602–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nowińska, K; Adamczyk, Z. Zinc and Lead Metallurgical Slags as a Potential Source of Metal Recovery: A Review. Materials 2023, 16(23), 7295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- De Andrade Lima, L.R.P.; Bernardez, L.Z. Characterization of the lead smelter slag in Santo Amaro, Bahia, Brazil. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2011, 189(9), 692–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kabata-Pendias, Alina. Trace Elements in Soil and Plants; CRC press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Adilet: Information and Legal System of Regulatory Legal Acts of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Available online: https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/V2100022595 (accessed on 19 February 2026).
- Sabitova, A.; Ualikhanov, A.; Klivenko, A.; Kabysheva, Zh.; Aitkaliyeva, G.; Kassymova, Zh. Microbiological Extraction of Copper and Zinc from Metallurgical Waste. Engineered Science 2025, 1579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bosecker, K. Bioleaching: metal solubilization by microorganisms. FEMS Microbiology Reviews 1997, 20(3-4), 591–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Onisei, S.; Pontikes, Y.; Van Gerven, T.; et al. Synthesis of inorganic polymers using fly ash and primary lead slag. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2012, 205-206, 101–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chowdhury, S. Recycled Smelter Slags for In Situ and Ex Situ Water and Wastewater Treatment—Current Knowledge and Opportunities. Processes 2023, 11(3), 783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ouala, O.; Essadki, Y.; Khalisse, H.; Chagiri, H.; Meddich, A.; El Khalloufi, F.; Oudra, B. Evaluation of slag fertilizer potential in Capsicum annuum L. cultivation and production. Journal of Agriculture and Environment for International Development (JAEID) 2024, 118(2), 119–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zakharova, O.; Baranchikov, P.; Chebotaryova, S.; Grigoriev, G.; Strekalova, N.; Grodetskaya, T.; Burmistrov, I.; Volokhov, S.; Kuznetsov, D.; Gusev, A. Metallurgical Waste for Sustainable Agriculture: Converter Slag and Blast-Furnace Sludge Increase Oat Yield in Acidic Soils. Agronomy 2024, 14(11), 2642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Das, S.; Gwon, H.S.; Khan, M.I.; et al. Steel slag amendment impacts on soil microbial communities and activities of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Sci Rep 2020, 10, 6746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Xue, J.; He, M.; Qi, H.; Wang, S. The Effects of Vermicompost and Steel Slag Amendments on the Physicochemical Properties and Bacterial Community Structure of Acidic Soil Containing Copper Sulfide Mines. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Radić, S.; Sandev, D.; Maldini, K.; Vujčić Bok, V.; Lepeduš, H.; Domijan, A.-M. Recycling Electric Arc Furnace Slag into Fertilizer: Effects of “Waste Product” on Growth and Physiology of the Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Agronomy 2022, 12, 2218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, M.; Liang, Y.; Chu, G. Applying silicate fertilizer increases both yield and quality of table grape (Vitis vinifera L.) grown on calcareous grey desert soil. Scientia Horticultura 2017, 225, 757–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zakharova, O.; Baranchikov, P.; Grodetskaya, T.; Kuznecov, D.; Gusv, A. Highly dispersed blast-furnace sludge as a new micronutrients fertilizer: promising result on rapeseed. Agronomy 2022, 12(12), 2929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mikula, K.; Skrzypczak, D.; Izydorczyk, G.; et al. From hazardous waste to fertilizer: Recovery of high-value metals from smelter slags. Chemosphere 2022, 297, 134226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xia, D. H.; Ren, L.; Chen, L. Z. Study of Ca-Mg-S-Si Fertilizer Produced by Magnesium Slag. Advanced Materials Research 2011, 347–353, 3166–3170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sagwal, A.; Wadhwa, P.; Shubham; Kaushal, S. Essentiality of Micronutrients in Soil: A Review. International of Plant & Soil Science 2023, 35(24), 56–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Assunção, A. G. L.; Cakmak, I.; Clemens, S.; González-Guerrero, M.; Nawrocki, A.; Thomine, S. Micronutrient homeostasis in plants for more sustainable agriculture and healthier human nutrition. Journal of Experimental Botany 2022, 73(6), 1789–1799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hänsch, R.; Mendel, R. Physiological functions of mineral micronutrients (Cu, Zn, Mn, Fe, Ni, Mo, B, Cl). Current Opinion in Plant Biology 2009, 12(3), 259–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gautam, S.; Paudel, M.R.; Devkova, A. Heavy Metal Pollution and Phytoremediation-A Review. Nepal Journal of Botany 2025, 2(01), 33–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Retamal-Salgado, J.; Hirzel, J.; Walter, I.; Matus, I. Bioabsorption and Bioaccumulation of Cadmium in the Straw and Grain of Maize (Zea mays L.) in Growing Soils Contaminated with Cadmium in Different Environment. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 1399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Elik, Ü.; Gül, Z. Accumulation Potential of Lead and Cadmium Metals in Maize (Zea mays L.) and Effects on Physiological-Morphological Characteristics. Life 2025, 15, 310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Figlioli, F.; Sorrentino, M.C.; Memoli, V.; et al. Overall plant responses to Cd and Pb metal stress in maize: Growth pattern, ultrastructure, and photosynthetic activity. Environ Sci Pollut Res 2019, 26, 1781–1790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sabitova, A.; Mukhamediyarov, N.; Mussabayeva, B.; Rakhadilov, B.; Aitkazin, N.; Bayakhmetova, B.; Sharipkhan, Z.; Gaisina, B. The Effect of the Granulometric Composition of Slags on the Efficiency of Non-Ferrous Metal Extraction. Processes 2025, 13, 2113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khaeim, H.; Kende, Z.; Jolánkai, M.; Kovács, G.P.; Gyuricza, C.; Tarnawa, Á. Impact of Temperature and Water on Seed Germination and Seedling Growth of Maize (Zea mays L.). Agronomy 2022, 12, 397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Riboldi, A.; Cornacchia, G.; Gelfi, M.; Borgese, L.; Zacco, A.; Bontempi, E.; Boniardi, M.V.; Casaroli, A.; Depero, L.E. Grain Size Effect in Elution Test of Electric Arc Furnace Slag. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Herbelin, M.; Bascou, J.; Lavastre, V.; Guillaume, D.; Benbakkar, M.; Peuble, S.; Baron, J.-P. Steel Slag Characterisation—Benefit of Coupling Chemical, Mineralogical and Magnetic Techniques. Minerals 2020, 10, 705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sabitova, A.; Kassymova, Zh.; Mukiyanova, R.; Bayahmetova, B.B.; Nurgaliev, N. Investigation of the Effectiveness of Metallurgical Slags in Fertilizer Production. Academic Scientific Journal of Chemistry 2025, 3(464), 233–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mikula, K.; Izydorczyk, G.; Skrzypczak, D.; Moustakas, K.; Witek-Krowiak, A.; Chojnacka, K. Value-added strategies for the sustainable handling, disposal, or value-added use of copper smelter and refinery wastes. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2021, 403, 123602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Banza, A.; Gock, E.; Kongolo, K. Base metals recovery from copper smelter slag by oxidising leaching and solvent extraction. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2002, 67(1-3), 63–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kachinsky, K.N. Fizika pochv [Soil Phisics]; Vissshaya Shkola: Moscow, Russia, 1965. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Y.; Li, Y.; Li, Y. Land Engineering Consolidates Degraded Sandy Land for Agricultural Development in the Largest Sandy Land of China. Land 2020, 9, 199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Serrapica, F.; Di Mola, I.; Cozzolino, E.; Ottaiano, L.; Sarubbi, F.; Pezzullo, G.; Di Francia, A.; Mori, M.; Masucci, F. Sustainable Maize Forage Production: Effect of Organic Amendments Combined with Microbial Biofertilizers Across Different Soil Textures. Sustainability 2025, 17, 9617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amissah, S.; Ankomah, G.; Agyei, B.K.; Lee, R.D.; Harris, G.H.; Cabrera, M.; Franklin, D.H.; Diaz-Perez, J.C.; Habteselassie, M.Y.; Sintim, H.Y. Nutrient Sufficiency Ranges for Corn at the Early Growth Stage: Implications for Nutrient Management. Plants 2023, 12, 713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Oberle, S.; Keeney, D. Soil type, precipitation, and fertilizer N effects on хcorn yields. Journal of Production Agriculture 1990, 3(4), 283–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siatwiinda, S.M.; Ros, G.H.; Yerokun, O.A.; et al. Options to reduce ranges in critical soil nutrient levels used in fertilizer recommendations by accounting for site conditions and methodology: A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 44 2024, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, M.; Li, Y.; Hu, Q.; Yu, X.; Huang, M.; Zhao, J.; Dong, S.; Yuan, X.; Wen, Y. Potassium Increases Nitrogen and Potassium Utilization Efficiency and Yield in Foxtail Millet. Agronomy 2023, 13, 2200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]


| Produced Metal | Volume of Generated Slag, t | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Iron (steel) | 0.12 | [10] |
| Iron (cast iron) | 0.22-0.37 | [11] |
| Lead | 0.6-0.7 | [12] |
| Aluminum | 0.2-0.5 | [13] |
| Ferrochrome | 1.1-3.5 | [14] |
| Zinc | > 2 | [15] |
| Copper | 2.2 | [9,16,17] |
| Magnesium | > 6 | [18] |
| Nickel | 6-16 | [19] |
| Element | Ferrous Metallurgy Slag | Non-Ferrous Metallurgy Slag | Maximum Allowable Concentration (MAC) in Soil [22,23] |
|---|---|---|---|
| Сd | ≤128 | ≤14000 | 5 |
| Pb | 0.2-126 | ≤319190 | 32 |
| As | ≤244 | 75865 | 2 |
| Cr | 0.1-32700 | ≤7510 | 6 |
| Сo | 0.03-210 | 0.97-24104 | 5 |
| Zn | 0.15-11000 | 13-379694 | 23 |
| Cu | 0.13-540 | 5-353580 | 3 |
| Fe | 0.02-61.8 | 0,67-62,0 | 2000-15000 |
| Metallurgical Slag | Effects of Application in Agriculture |
|---|---|
| Steel slag | Application at 20 g/kg of soil enhanced the growth parameters of Capsicum annuum L. by 2 or more times, with sulfur (S) content in fruits exceeding that of the positive control by fourfold. Concentrations of other macro- and microelements (N, P, K, Ca, Mg, Zn, Fe, Si) in fruits remained comparable to those in the positive control [28] |
| Dried sludge from wet gas cleaning in a blast furnace shop and converter slag | The application increased the field yield of Avena sativa L. by more than 30%, with plant height increased by an average of 18% [29] |
| Linz-Donawitz converter slag | The addition increased soil organic carbon by 14%, readily mineralizable carbon by 42%, microbial biomass carbon by 30%, available phosphorus by 33%, exchangeable Ca2+ by 47%, and exchangeable Mg2+ by 65%. It also enhanced the rate of photosynthesis in Oryza sativa L. by 21.1 and 18%, and increased the contents of N, P and Si in straw by 20.1 and 22.2%, 17 and 18.4%, and 29.9 and 30.5% in Japonica and Indica rice varieties, respectively. Grain yield increased by 15.2 and 13.6%, straw biomass by 19.9 and 22%, and root biomass by 17.2 and 19.4% in the two varieties [30] |
| Steel slag | The simultaneous application of steel slag (2% by weight) and vermicompost (4% by weight) increased soil electrical conductivity by 34% compared to the control, microbial growth rate by 119%, while Cu bioavailability in contaminated soils decreased by 72%. In addition, the biomass of Lolium Perenne L. under the combined application of vermicompost and steel slag exceeded that of the variant with vermicompost alone by 15% [31] |
| Electric arc furnace (EAF) slag | The introduction of low-slag EAF additives into the soil, a combination of EAF slag and NPK, improved gas exchange parameters, with the net rate of photosynthesis being 30% higher under the combined use of NPK fertilizer and slag compared to NPK alone. It also enhanced the activity of nitrate reductase in the bean plant Phaseolus vulgaris L. [32] |
| Steel slag | The use of water-cooled slag or steel slag fertilizer over two years of testing increased the yield of table grapes Vitis vinifera L. by 13.5% compared to the control [33] |
| Blast furnace gas cleaning sludge | The introduction of highly dispersed blast furnace gas cleaning sludge (at a dosage of 0.5 to 2 t/ha) stimulated the photosynthetic activity of Brassica napus L. plants, increasing the average root length by 50% and stem length by 15%. Maximum seed germination was also recorded, being 7% higher than the control values [34] |
| Lead slag | The introduction of a 20% dose of lead slag extract increased the biomass of Cucumis sativus L. seedlings by 11% compared to the control [35] |
| Magnesium slag | Application of magnesium slag fertilizer increased lodging resistance, enhanced late-stage growth, and shortened the growing season of agricultural crops, including Zea diploperenni L., Raphanus sativus L. [36] |
| Fraction size, mm | Content, % | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slag from former lead plant, storage facility 1 | Slag from former lead plant, storage facility 2 | Slag from former lead plant, storage facility 3 | Slag from Zhezkent MPP | |
| >5 | 83.,32 | 42.18 | 41.35 | 89.30 |
| 5-2 | 11.31 | 22.31 | 23.95 | 0.27 |
| 2-1 | 1.66 | 18.06 | 16.72 | 0.60 |
| 1-0,75 | 1.63 | 9.93 | 10.05 | 0.25 |
| 0,75-0,5 | 0.68 | 4.24 | 4.35 | 0.75 |
| 0,5 - 0,25 | 0.61 | 2.05 | 2.15 | 4.07 |
| <0,25 | 0.80 | 1.25 | 1.45 | 4.77 |
| Total | 100.01 | 100.02 | 100.02 | 100.01 |
| Element | Slag from former lead plant, storage facility 1 | Slag from former lead plant, storage facility 2 | Slag from former lead plant, storage facility 2 | Slag from Zhezkent MPP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K | 10600±1400 | 7500±980 | 4000±540 | 6100±830 |
| Ca | 93800±12200 | 92800±12000 | 40500±5400 | 19400±2500 |
| Mg | 17800±2300 | 15400±2000 | 13900±1900 | 18700±2500 |
| Cu | 5100±670 | 7200±940 | 3700±500 | 1800±250 |
| Zn | < d.l. | < d.l. | 87400±15600 | 4400±650 |
| Fe | 256000±33000 | 259000±34000 | 261000±34700 | 150900±19800 |
| Mn | 4400±5800 | 4900±640 | 3800±510 | 400±50 |
| Na | 10700±1400 | 9200±1200 | 5100±670 | 2600±360 |
| Pb | 860±110 | 460±60 | 17500±2300 | 2200±290 |
| Cr | < d.l. | < d.l. | 65±11 | 10±1 |
| Cd | < d.l. | 1,4±0,2 | 37±6 | 19±3 |
| As | < d.l. | 8±1 | 110±19 | 79±12 |
| Element | K2SO4 | NH4OH |
|---|---|---|
| Ca | 27.605±0.199 | 9.398±0.084 |
| Mg | 5.959±0.064 | 6.088±0.046 |
| Cu | 91.365±4.327 | 423.751±5.750 |
| Zn | 86.649±1.094 | 34.352±0.882 |
| Fe | 5.567±0.025 | 5.028±0.013 |
| Mn | 22.652±0.163 | 0.185±0.001 |
| Pb | 3.343±0.108 | <d.l. |
| Cr | <d.l. | <d.l. |
| Cd | 0.393±0.050 | 0.269±0.001 |
| As | <d.l. | <d.l. |
| Fraction size, mm | >5 | 5-2 | 2-1 | 1-0,75 | 0,75-0,5 | 0,5 - 0,25 | <0,25 |
| Mass fraction, % | 12,03 | 9,29 | 9,24 | 14,30 | 24,62 | 22,97 | 7,56 |
| Parametr | Measured value | Optimum value [54] |
|---|---|---|
| рН in water | 8,5 | 6-7 |
| Organic matter, % | 1,2573 ± 0,5157 | >5 |
| N, g/kg | 11,9 ±0,03 | 30-40 |
| K, g/kg | 0,0386 ± 0,00015 | 20-30 |
| P, g/kg | 0,2286±0,0086 | 3-5 |
| Ca, g/kg | 0,4853 ±0,0051 | 2,5-8 |
| Mg, g/kg | 0,0531 ±0,0001 | 1,5-6 |
| Cu, mg/kg | 0,8±0,05 | 5-25 |
| Zn, mg/kg | 8,4±0,09 | 20-70 |
| Fe, mg/kg | 396,5±7,5 | 30-250 |
| Mn, mg/kg | 3,0±0,1 | 20-150 |
| Pb, mg/kg | 2,3±0,027 | - |
| Cr, mg/kg | 12,1±0,01 | - |
| Cd, mg/kg | <п.o. | - |
| As, mg/kg | <п.o. | - |
| Biometric parameter | Seed treated with K2SO4 –based extract | Seed treated with NH4OH – based extract | Control (no fertilizer extract treatment) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plant height, cm | 158,5±10,14 | 167,5±7,31 | 165±9,72 |
| Stem length, cm | 149,5 ±15,53 | 155,5±13,82 | 154,7±14,35 |
| Root length, cm | 25±1,68 | 22±1,43 | 24±1,54 |
| Stem diameter, cm | 1,56±0,02 | 1,62±0,01 | 1,59±0,02 |
| Number of leaves, pcs | 13±1 | 9±1 | 13±1 |
| Number of cobs, pcs | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Cob diameter, cm | 4,9±0,15 | 5,1±0,09 | 4,9±0,16 |
| Cob length, cm | 29±0,71 | 28±0,49 | 28±0,65 |
| Fresh plant biomass, g | 379,39±29,61 | 338,93±27,15 | 381,0791±31,67 |
| Dry aboveground biomass, g | 115,53±14,67 | 73,6151±8,96 | 100,3553±8,61 |
| Fresh root biomass, g | 10,89±0,83 | 12,4506±0,71 | 8,9676±0,75 |
| Dry root biomass, g | 10,85±0,21 | 11,0562±0,84 | 8,1235±0,54 |
| Roots | Solution | Cr | Pb | Cu | Zn |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K2SO4 | 1,515± 0,0174 | 6,554 ±0,387 | 12,490±0,470 | 53,146±0,852 | |
| NH4OH | 0,9617± 0,017 | 6,847±0,501 | 6,090±0,522 | 45,348±2,909 | |
| H2O | 3,029±0,149 | 10,382±0,350 | 9,262±0.172 | 70,218±2,716 | |
| Stems | K2SO4 | < п.o. | 6,520± 0,710 | 10,328±1.8 | 41,971±1,619 |
| NH4OH | < п.o. | < п.o. | 1,423± 0,1317 | 80,627±2,599 | |
| H2O | < п.o. | < п.o. | 0,446±0,0422 | 104,281± 4.978 | |
| Leaves | K2SO4 | 2,319±0,054 | < п.o. | 4,341± 0,067 | 44,324±1,116 |
| NH4OH | < п.o. | 3,179±0,595 | 3,078±0,328 | 53,979±2,827 | |
| H2O | < п.o. | 3,359±0,053 | 2,491±0,126 | 34,112±1,190 | |
| Cobs | K2SO4 | < п.o. | < п.o. | 1,220±0,221 | 45,438±0,857 |
| NH4OH | < п.o. | < п.o. | 2,739±0,239 | 55,661±2,233 | |
| H2O | < п.o. | < п.o. | 3,506±0,199 | 46,382±5,331 | |
| MAC in plants, mg/kg [22] |
5-30 | 30-300 | 5-30 | 100-400 | |
| TC value | Degree of uptake |
|---|---|
| КТ < 0,01 | no uptake |
| 0,01 ≤ КТ≤0,1 | weak uptake |
| 0,1 ≤ КТ≤ 1,0 | moderate uptake |
| 1,0 ≤ КТ | intensive uptake |
| Element | average concentration in stems / average concentration in roots | average concentration in leaves / average concentration in roots | average concentration in cobs / average concentration in roots | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K2SO4 | NH4OH | H2O | K2SO4 | NH4OH | H2O | K2SO4 | NH4OH | H2O | |
| Cr | 1,531* | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Pb | 0,995 | — | — | 0,485 | 0,464 | 0,324 | — | — | — |
| Cu | 0,827 | 0,233 | 0,048** | 0,347 | 0,505 | 0,269 | 0,097** | 0,449 | 0,378 |
| Zn | 0,789 | 1,778* | 1,485* | 0,834 | 1,190* | 0,486 | 0,855 | 1,227* | 0,661 |
| Element | Ca | Mg | Cu | Zn | Fe | Mn | Pb | Cr | Cd | As |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K2SO4 | 2,509 | 0,542 | 8,306 | 7,877 | 0,506 | 2,059 | 0,304 | <п.o. | 0,0357 | <п.o. |
| NH4OH | 0,047 | 0,030 | 2,108 | 0,171 | 0,025 | 0,0009 | <п.o. | <п.o. | 0,001 | <п.o. |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).