Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Varicosity of Vortex Vein Ampulla in Ocular Fundus: Descriptive Series of 53 Patients and Literature Review

Submitted:

17 March 2026

Posted:

18 March 2026

You are already at the latest version

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Varicosities of the vortex vein ampulla are transient dilations of vortex vein ampullae that appear as red-brown choroidal masses. The purpose of this manuscript is to describe a retrospective case series of 53 patients with varicosities of the vortex vein ampulla and perform a literature review on this topic. Methods: Our case series demonstrates the clinical features of a large cohort of varicosities of the vortex vein ampulla, including their locations in the ocular fundus, sizes when congested, direction of gaze that resulted in detection, frequency of multiple lesions in a single eye, and frequency of bilateral cases. The literature review utilized PubMed and Embase libraries and included all studies published through December 2025. Results: The literature review yielded 44 articles, of which 37 were deemed relevant. Several studies described the appearance of these lesions using imaging modalities, including B-scan ultrasonography, optical coherence tomography, and indocyanine green angiography. Others underscored the potential for these lesions to be mistaken for other types of choroidal masses, such as choroidal melanomas. Conclusions: This extensive series demonstrates that these lesions are most often located nasally, sometimes multiple or bilateral, and often mistaken for choroidal nevi or melanomas, highlighting the importance of understanding clinical characteristics for appropriate diagnosis. In addition, some studies described possible associations with conditions such as nodular scleritis and Donnai-Barrow syndrome.

Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Varix or varicosity of a vortex vein ampulla in the ocular fundus was first described as a distinct clinical entity by Osher et al in 1981 [1]. The affected vortex vein ampulla becomes visibly congested and darker when the patient looks in a particular direction of gaze during ophthalmic examination. Its elevation when congested can be confirmed in many cases by diagnostic ocular ultrasonography or optical coherence tomography (OCT) and sometimes by fundus photography; however, because of its typical position near the ocular equator [2,3] good photographic documentation is frequently difficult. Although varicosity of a vortex vein ampulla is not known to cause any functional abnormalities of the affected eye, it is mistaken occasionally for a choroidal nevus or small choroidal melanoma by inexperienced examiners performing indirect ophthalmoscopy [4].
Recent studies have examined vortex vein ampulla varicosities using multimodal imaging. Veronese et al. [5] performed a retrospective analysis of 8 patients, highlighting the utility of multimodal imaging in characterizing these lesions. Reported findings include hyporeflective lesions on infrared imaging, hyporeflective cavities with internal lobules using extended depth imaging optical coherence tomography, and hyperfluorescence with progressive pooling using indocyanine green angiography (ICGA). While multimodal imaging may aid in differentiating vortex vein ampulla varicosities from other choroidal lesions, most lesions of this type do not require ancillary testing for diagnosis. The purpose of our study was to perform a literature review of papers on this topic and to describe clinical features of vortex vein ampulla varicosities in a large cohort that may provide additional differentiating features without reliance on advanced imaging.

2. Materials and Methods

The authors performed a retrospective descriptive subgroup study of patients found to have one or more fundus lesions consistent with varicosity of the vortex vein ampulla who were encountered in a single ocular oncology practice during a 40-year interval (1979-2018). The principal aspects of these lesions evaluated in this study were (1) the proportion of such lesions that had been detected by an eye care professional and prompted referral to our ocular oncology practice versus detected during ophthalmoscopy in our practice performed for an unrelated abnormality, (2) the frequency of multiple such lesions in an affected eye and patient, (3) the spectrum of size of such lesions when congested, (4) the frequency distribution of topographical location of the lesions in the ocular fundus, (5) the prevalence of bilateral cases, and (6) the gaze direction of the eye that prompted congestion of the identified vortex vein ampullas.
The 53 cases evaluated in this study were those of patients diagnosed as having one or more fundus lesions consistent with varicosity of the vortex vein ampulla encountered in the clinical ocular practice of authors JJA and ZMC. Lesions were considered vortex vein ampulla varicosities if they demonstrated gaze-induced congestion and/or collapsed with pressure in the absence of clinical features suggestive of choroidal nevus or melanoma. All known patients with vortex vein ampulla varicosities evaluated by either clinician prior to initiation of the study were included. These cases were identified by review of a comprehensive diagnostic database of all patients who had been encountered in the practice that had been prepared by the senior author during 2023. Prior to data abstraction, a list of variables was created to facilitate data abstraction form that included all the relevant raw variables. Included on this list was the diameter of such lesions when congested. The measurements were obtained by the examining ophthalmologist (ZMC or JJA) using indirect ophthalmoscopy. In most cases, thickness measurements of the lesion when congested were corroborated by ocular ultrasonography. The first author (JTR) reviewed each ocular oncology chart of the identified patients and collated the preplanned information from the charts onto the data abstraction forms. The first author then transcribed the information from the data abstraction forms into an electronic data analysis database (SPSS® for Windows, Version 8.0.0, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The authors performed descriptive data analysis of the evaluated variables and tabulated the summary information on these cases.

2.1. Literature Review

A literature search was performed using PubMed and Embase. All articles published online through December 2025 were included. The search terms used were “vortex vein ampulla varicosity”, “vortex vein ampulla varix”, “vortex vein varicosity”, and “vortex vein varix”. Inclusion criteria consisted of relevant clinical articles, while exclusion criteria included any article that did not describe relevant clinical cases. Collected articles were assessed for clinical variables of patients including number of vortex vein ampulla varicosity lesions, eyes involved, lesion location, multiplicity and bilaterality of lesions, dynamic behavior of lesions, multimodal imaging of lesions, and conditions possibly associated with lesions. For studies involving multiple patients or lesions, lesion location, multiplicity, and bilaterality of lesions were summarized with descriptors rather than individually.

3. Results

3.1. Case Series

Our retrospective study group consisted of 53 patients. A summary of evaluated clinical variables and their categories and scale units are presented in Table 1. Thirty-four patients (64.2%) were men and 19 (35.8%) were women. The youngest patient was 19.6 years old at initial diagnosis and the oldest was 85.6 years old. The median patient age was 58.9 years. Fourteen of the 53 patients (26.4%) were referred to our practice because of a detected varicosity of the vortex vein ampulla. The referral diagnosis was choroidal nevus, choroidal melanoma, or “rule out” choroidal melanoma in all these cases. In contrast, 39 patients (73.6%) were found to have one or more varicosities of the vortex vein ampulla on ophthalmoscopy performed in our ocular oncology practice even though these lesions had not been noted by the referring doctor. None of these patients had any ocular symptoms attributable to a vortex vein ampulla lesion or any visual impairment related to such lesion.
Forty-six of the 53 patients (86.8%) had a single varicosity of the vortex vein ampulla in one affected eye, 4 patients (7.5%) had two varicosities of the vortex vein ampulla in one affected eye, 2 patients (3.8%) had one varicosity of the vortex vein ampulla in each eye, and one had two varicosities of the vortex vein ampulla in each eye. The right eye only was affected in 29 patients (54.7%), the left eye only was affected in 21 patients (39.6%), and both eyes were affected in 3 patients (5.7%). The total number of clinically identified varicosities of the vortex vein ampulla in the 56 affected eyes of the 53 study patients was 62.
The distribution of the varicosities is summarized in Table 3. Twenty-four of the 62 (38.7%) clinically identified varicosities of the vortex vein ampulla were located in the superonasal quadrant of the ocular fundus and another 24 (38.7%) were in the inferonasal quadrant (Figure 1), while only 10 (16.1%) were inferotemporal and only 4 (6.5%) were superotemporal. The median measurements of the vortex vein ampullas when congested were as follows: largest basal diameter = 3 mm (minimum 1.5 mm, maximum 8.0 mm); smallest basal diameter = 2 mm (minimum 0.5 mm, maximum 4.5 mm); and median height = 1 mm (minimum 0.5 mm, maximum 1.5 mm). (Figure 2)
The relationship between the direction of gaze that resulted in congestion of vortex vein ampulla and the topographical fundus lesion location of the affected vortex vein ampulla is shown in Table 1. In most cases (49 of 61, 80.3%), the direction of gaze that resulted in congestion of the vortex vein ampulla was toward the quadrant of the fundus lesion. Interestingly, one lesion appeared slightly congested persistently regardless of the direction of gaze. No lesion in this series was evaluated by FA, ICGA, OCT-A, fundus autofluorescence or other multimodal imaging methods.

3.2. Literature Review

Our literature search yielded 44 publications, of which 37 were deemed relevant based on the inclusion/exclusion criteria.(Table 3) Across these studies, most lesions were unilateral and singular, although bilateral and multiple lesions were infrequently reported. Gaze-evoked intumescence and collapse with globe pressure were the most commonly reported dynamic behaviors. These lesions were occasionally identified as mimickers of more serious pathologies, including choroidal melanoma and subretinal hemorrhage. They were also reported in association with systemic and ocular conditions, including Donnai-Barrow syndrome and nodular scleritis. A majority of recent studies focus on advanced imaging modalities, including OCT and ICGA, to further characterize these lesions.

3.2. Figures and Tables

Figure 1. Magnified fundus photo showing a detumescent vortex vein ampulla (inferonasal quadrant right eye) that abruptly becomes congested as the patient’s direction of gaze changes indicated by the white arrow.
Figure 1. Magnified fundus photo showing a detumescent vortex vein ampulla (inferonasal quadrant right eye) that abruptly becomes congested as the patient’s direction of gaze changes indicated by the white arrow.
Preprints 203603 g001
Figure 2. B-scan ultrasound shows gradual intumescence of vortex vein ampulla as light digital pressure is released from the pre-equatorial quadrant where the lesion is located.
Figure 2. B-scan ultrasound shows gradual intumescence of vortex vein ampulla as light digital pressure is released from the pre-equatorial quadrant where the lesion is located.
Preprints 203603 g002
Table 1. Categorical distribution of clinical variables evaluated in 53 patients with one or more varicosities of vortex vein ampulla.
Table 1. Categorical distribution of clinical variables evaluated in 53 patients with one or more varicosities of vortex vein ampulla.
Preprints 203603 i001
Table 2. Cross-tabulation of direction of gaze that resulted in congestion of vascular lesion (columns) by location of vascular lesion (rows) for 61 varicosities of vortex vein ampulla.a.
Table 2. Cross-tabulation of direction of gaze that resulted in congestion of vascular lesion (columns) by location of vascular lesion (rows) for 61 varicosities of vortex vein ampulla.a.
direction of ocular gaze that resulted in vortex vein ampulla’s congestion (N)
quadrant location
of lesion
S SN N IN I IT T ST all
SN (superonasal) 5 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 1b
IN (inferonasal) 0 0 0 20 0 4 0 0 0
IT (inferotemporal) 0 0 0 0 1 9 0 0 0
ST (superotemporal) 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0
Legend: N = number of patients, S = superior, SN = superonasal, N = nasal, IN = inferonasal, I = inferior, IT = inferotemporal, T = temporal, ST = supertemporal, agaze direction that resulted in congestion of 1 superotemporal vortex vein ampulla was not recorded in patient’s chart. bone vortex vein ampulla remained persistently congested regardless of direction of gaze.
Table 3. Literature Review of Varicosities of the Vortex Vein Ampulla.
Table 3. Literature Review of Varicosities of the Vortex Vein Ampulla.
Study
Author, year [ref]
Study Type N (patients) N (eyes) Eye(s)
involved
Lesion
location
Multiplicity Laterality Dynamic
Behavior
Advanced imaging modalities Associated/mimicked conditions Key notes
Zhang et al., 2018 [22] Case report 1 1 OD Superotemporal Single Unilateral Collapse with globe pressure B-scan Anterior scleritis
Wolfensberger et al, 1997 [11] Case report 1 1 OS Superior Single Unilateral Collapse with globe pressure FA Choroidal melanoma mimic Article not in English, data abstraction relied on English-translated abstract
Weidmayer et al, 2021 [29] Case report 1 1 OS Superotemporal Single Unilateral Collapse with globe pressure OCT, B-scan, FAF Lesion that spontaneously appeared and resolved, even when patient looked towards direction of lesion
Veronese et al, 2019 [5] Descriptive imaging series 8 8 Mixed (7 OD, 1 OS) Multiple Single Unilateral Collapse with globe pressure OCT, FA, ICGA, FAF, IR
Vahdani et al, 2010 [7] Case report 1 1 OS Inferonasal Multiple Unilateral Gaze evoked intumescence; collapse with globe pressure Not described
Suetov et al, 2022 [8] Case series 2 Unable to assess - article not in English Unable to assess - article not in English Unable to assess due to article not in English Multiple Bilateral Unable to assess - article not in English Unable to assess - article not in English Article not in English so data abstraction relied on English-translated abstract
Spiess et al, 2022 [19] Case report 1 1 OD Superonasal Single Unilateral Collapse with globe pressure OCT
Snyers et al, 2002 [30] Descriptive imaging series Unable to assess due to article not being in English Unable to assess due to article not being in English Unable to assess due to article not being in English Unable to assess-article not in English Unable to assess due to article not being in English Unable to assess due to article not being in English Gaze evoked intumescence; Valsalva evoked intumescence ICGA
Singh et al, 1993 [31] Imaging case report 1 1 OS Inferonasal Single Unilateral Gaze evoked intumescence; Valsalva evoked intumescence B-scan, ICGA Lesion simulated choroidal melanoma
Siddiqui et al, 2019 [21] Imaging case report 1 1 OD Inferonasal Single Unilateral Collapse with globe pressure Intraoperative OCT Choroidal hemorrhage mimic during pars plana vitrectomy for vitreous opacities
Shields et al. 1995 [17] Descriptive imaging study 1 1 Not described Not described Single Unilateral Gaze evoked intumescence ICGA
Rubegni et al. 2025 [15] Imaging case report 1 1 OS Inferotemporal Single Unilateral Collapse with globe pressure OCT
Rimsaite et al. 2015 [14] Case report 1 1 OS Superotemporal Single Unilateral Collapse with globe pressure OCT, ICGA Lesion simulated choroidal melanoma Article not in English. Data transcribed using English-translated version.
Rayess et al. 2015 [20] Imaging case report 1 1 OD Superonasal Single Unilateral Not described OCT, B-scan, FA Authors noted that OCT was the only imaging modality in this case that diagnosed the lesion.
Osher et al. 1981 [1] Descriptive case series 5 5 Mixed (1 OD, 1 OU, 3 not specified) Multiple (3 superonasal, 2 inferior, 1 unspecified) Single One patient with bilateral Gaze evoked intumescence; Valsalva evoked intumescence; collapse with globe pressure B-scan, FA
Niu et al. 2025 [32] Imaging case report 1 1 OD Inferotemporal Single Unilateral Gaze evoked intumescence; collapse with globe pressure OCT, B-scan, ICGA
Nitta et al. 2024 [33] Imaging case report 1 1 OS Inferonasal Single Unilateral Gaze evoked intumescence; collapse with globe pressure OCT, FA, ICGA Patient with a vortex vein ampulla varix in OS and a macular vortex vein in OD
Murtagh et al. 2021 [34] Case report 1 1 OS Superonasal Single Unilateral Collapse with globe pressure OCT
Milani et al. 2022 [27] Case report 1 1 OD Inferotemporal Single Unilateral Not described OCT, B-scan, FA ICGA Suprachoroidal hemorrhage found adjacent to a vortex vein ampulla varix. Authors hypothesized that the varix predisposed the hemorrhage.
Lopez et al. 1986 [35] Case series 3 Unable to access Unable to access Unable to access article Unable to access Unable to access Collapse with globe pressure Unable to access article Unable to access complete article
Levy et al. 2005 [13] Case series 3 3 Mixed (2 OS, 1 OD) Multiple (1 inferonasal, 2 superonasal) Multiple Unilateral Gaze evoked intumescence; collapse with globe pressure B-scan Choroidal melanoma mimic
Khan et al. 2007 [36] Prospective study 1 Not described Not described Not described Not described Not described Not described Not described Choroidal melanoma mimic Study assessing accuracy of referrals for suspected choroidal melanoma
Kang et al. 2017 [37] Imaging case report 1 1 OD Superonasal Single Unilateral Gaze evoked intumescence; collapse with globe pressure OCT, FA, ICGA Description of vortex vein ampulla dynamics using real-time angiography.
Kang et al. 2000 [12] Imaging case report 1 1 OD Superonasal Single Unilateral Gaze evoked intumescence; collapse with globe pressure FA, ICGA
Ismail et al. 2011 [6] Imaging case report 1 1 OD Superonasal Single Unilateral Collapse with globe pressure OCT, ICGA Subretinal hemorrhage mimic
Hunter et al. 1983 [38] Case series 2 2 Mixed (1 OD, 1 OS) Multiple (1 superonasal, 1 superior) Single Unilateral Gaze evoked intumescence; collapse with globe pressure
Higham et al. 2022 [24] Case series 2 4 OU Macular Multiple Bilateral Not described OCT, ICGA Association with Donnai-Barrow syndrome
Gunduz et al. 1998 [39] Case series 4 4 Not described Multiple One patient with multiple varix Unilateral Gaze evoked intumescence B-scan, FA, ICGA Choroidal melanoma mimic
Ghadiali et al. 2017 [26] Case report 1 1 OD Superotemporal Single Unilateral Collapse with globe pressure OCT, ICGA Choroidal melanoma mimic
Garcia-Bardera et al. 2024 [40] Imaging case report 1 1 OD Superonasal Single Unilateral Gaze evoked intumescence; valsalva evoked intumescence; collapse with globe pressure OCT Unable to access complete article
Levin et al. 2025 [9] Imaging case series 22 22 Mixed (12 OS, 10 OD) Multiple locations reported Single Unilateral Gaze evoked intumescence; valsalva evoked intumescence; collapse with globe pressure OCT, B-scan, ICGA, IR
de Carlo et al. 2021 [18] Imaging case series 4 4 Mixed (2 OD, 2 OS) Multiple (2 inferotemporal, 2 superonasal, 1 superotemporal) One patient with multiple Unilateral Valsalva evoked intumescence; collapse with globe pressure B-scan Choroidal nevus, choroidal hemorrhage, & choroidal neoplasm mimic
da Cruz et al. 1994 [41] Case report 1 1 OD Multiple (1 superior, 1 superonasal) Multiple Unilateral Gaze evoked intumescence; position dependent; collapse with globe pressure Choroidal metastases mimic
Cabral et al. 2022 [23] Case report 1 1 Unable to access complete article Inferior Single Unilateral Unable to access complete article OCT, B-scan, FA, ICGA Possible association with nodular posterior scleritis Unable to access complete article
Buettner et al. 1990 [4] Case report 1 1 OD Superonasal Single Unilateral collapse w/ globe pressure; no change in intumescence with gaze change or patient positioning B-scan Choroidal melanoma mimic Patient presenting with persistently engorged vortex vein ampulla varix.
Al-Dahmash et al. 2021 [42] Case report 1 Unable to assess due to article not being in English OD Unable to assess due to article not being in English Multiple Unable to assess due to article not being in English Unable to assess due to article not being in English Unable to assess due to article not being in English Choroidal metastases mimic Article not in English so data abstraction relied on english-translated abstract
Adam et al. 2013 [43] Case report 1 1 Unable to access complete article Parafoveal Single Unilateral Unable to access complete article OCT, FA, ICGA Unable to access complete article. Description of a submacular varix.
Abbreviations: FA, fluorescein angiography; FAF, fundus autofluorescence; ICGA, indocyanine green angiography; IR, infrared; OCT, optical coherence tomography.

4. Discussion

In their initial description of lesions of the type we evaluated in our study, Osher et al. [1] identified most of the relevant currently recognized features of such lesions, including the following: (1) abrupt congestion and just as abrupt collapse (detumescence) of the affected vortex vein ampulla depending on the patient’s direction of gaze; (2) congestion of the affected vortex vein ampulla induced by direction of gaze towards the quadrant where the vortex vein ampulla is located; (3) collapse of the congested vortex vein ampulla when light digital pressure is applied to the eye during ophthalmoscopy; (4) congestion of the vortex vein ampulla induced by patient inversion or Valsalva maneuver even when the primary position of gaze is maintained; (5) ultrasonographically documentable change in internal to external dimension (height) of a vortex vein ampulla when the ampulla is congested versus collapsed (Figure 1 and Figure 2); and (6) normal filling and draining of the affected vortex vein ampulla when evaluated by fluorescein angiography (FA).
Additional features described by subsequent authors on this topic include variable size of the affected vortex vein ampulla when congested versus collapsed documentable by optical coherence tomography (OCT) [6] and multiplicity of vortex vein ampullas that become congested in some eyes and bilateral lesions of this type in occasional patients [7,8].
Our series of cases of this entity (53 patients, 56 affected eyes, 62 lesions) is the largest such series yet reported. The largest previously reported series we have been able to find consisted of 22 patients (22 affected eyes, 22 lesions) [9]. Our series contributes additional information not previously reported in the literature, including the direction of gaze that induces lesion intumescence, and multiplicity, bilaterality, and approximate dimensions of these lesions.
In our series, the affected vortex vein ampulla was most often located in the oblique nasal quadrants of the fundus (i.e., superonasally or inferonasally) and infrequently in the oblique temporal quadrants (i.e, superotemporally or inferotemporally). None of the lesions was located in the direct vertical or horizontal meridians of the fundus. All of the lesions in our series were located in the posterior portion of the equatorial zone of the peripheral fundus [10]. Although one might speculate that some of these lesions might occur secondary to compression of the vortex vein at or near its exit from the sclera by an extraocular muscle or its tendon when the eye looks in a particular direction, such a mechanism seems unlikely in most cases. Kinking of the vein in the orbit at or near its scleral exit site seems to be a more satisfactory explanation for most lesions of this type [11]. To our knowledge, there is no satisfactory anatomic explanation for the preferential location of these lesions in the oblique nasal quadrants.
Varix of a vortex vein ampulla is generally considered to be quite rare; [12,13,14] however, to our knowledge, no report of the frequency of this lesion based on a prospective study of normal eyes of healthy persons with differing levels of refractive error and different axial lengths (let alone of eyes or patients affected by specified disorders) has ever been published. Even in eyes that exhibit such a direction-of-gaze induced transient congestion of a vortex vein ampulla, most vortex vein ampullas in that eye are not affected. Reports of a few eyes that exhibited two separate varicosities of vortex vein ampullas in a single eye have been published [5,7,8] as well as an occasional report of one or more lesions of this type in both eyes [8]. In our series, two patients (3.8%) had one varicosity of the vortex vein ampulla in each eye and one (1.9%) had two varicosities of the vortex vein ampulla in each eye.
In this retrospective study, our charts did not contain information about the impact of light digital pressure on the globe or Valsalva maneuver on the gaze-induced overfilling of the affected vortex vein ampullas, the refractive error of the affected eyes, or the ocular axial length of those eyes. Because of this, none of these variables were evaluated in this study. None of the patients in this series had been subjected to dynamic orbital vascular imaging by computed tomographic or magnetic resonance imaging methods to evaluate the precise cause of the gaze-induced congestion of the affected vortex vein ampullas.
A varix or varicosity of a vein is generally defined as a persistently dilated venous blood vessel due to chronically elevated intraluminal venous pressure. Classic examples are varicose veins of the lower extremities and esophageal varices. While bodily inversion, where the legs are elevated above the heart, can result in reduction of intraluminal venous pressure within varicose veins of the lower extremities, the affected veins remain dilated, albeit less congested. The transient congestion of a vortex vein ampulla induced by gaze direction described in this report does not, in our opinion, conform to the definition of a true varix. The affected vestibule or ampulla of a choroidal vortex vein becomes overfilled due to transient increased intraluminal venous pressure in that system, which is presumably attributable to partial mechanical obstruction of a vein connecting the ampulla to either the superior or inferior ophthalmic vein in the orbit after its exit from the sclera. As soon as the eye looks in an alternate direction of gaze, the intraluminal venous pressure falls, and the overfilling of the ampulla disappears. In our opinion, there is currently no existing term that adequately describes this lesion.
One vortex vein ampulla in our series was slightly congested regardless of the eye’s direction of gaze. This vortex vein ampulla exhibited a markedly irregular basal shape different from that of any other ampulla in the series. This feature suggested to us that that this vascular lesion may have resulted from persistent partial obstruction of the vortex vein connecting it to the superior ophthalmic vein in the orbit resulting from anomalous venous variation. Because this ampulla exhibited persistent dilation, it might be classified appropriately as a true varix of that ampulla. Buettner et al [4]. similarly described a patient with an engorged vortex vein ampulla varix that persisted despite changes to the patient’s direction of gaze or body positioning. This lesion did disappear with sufficient globe pressure. The authors hypothesized that this persistent engorgement was due to a very narrow emissary scleral canal, preventing venous outflow from the varix.
In summary, this study can be criticized by its retrospective design, but it appears to be the largest reported series of vortex vein ampulla varicosities demonstrating their approximate sizes, direction of gaze resulting in engorgement, occasional multiplicity or bilaterality, and most often nasal distribution. These lesions are clinically significant as they may mimic choroidal melanoma or nevus. Awareness of the described clinical features and dynamic behavior of these lesions may help clinicians reach an accurate diagnosis.

4.1. Literature on the Topic of Multimodal Imaging

More recent studies have utilized multimodal imaging to study these lesions. On color fundus photography, vortex vein ampulla varicosities most often appear as maroon-colored choroidal masses, though nonpigmented lesions have also been described [15], 16]. Near-infrared reflectance imaging shows a hyporeflective lesion that is clearly delineated from surrounding structures [9].
Indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) provides valuable information about the choroidal circulation and clearly highlights vortex vein ampullae [12]. Vortex vein ampulla varicosities demonstrate early, homogenous pooling of dye without associated leakage or staining. Applied ocular pressure or changes in gaze, to where the lesion is no longer intumescent, results in a gradual reduction of hypercyanescence. Shields et al. reported dye filling of a vortex vein ampulla varicosity beginning at 38 seconds following administration of indocyanine green and reaching maximum filling at 70 seconds [17]. Despite the ability of ICGA to clearly delineate these lesions, this imaging modality is limited in its clinical utility given the invasive nature of the procedure and ability to discern these lesions based on clinical exam.
Fluorescein angiography, by contrast, provides little additional information, given that VVAs may only appear mildly hyperfluorescent within a background of choroidal flush [5].
B-scan ultrasonography demonstrates a dome-shaped elevation with low internal reflectivity. The lesion flattens when pressure is applied to the eye or the patient’s gaze is redirected, so that the lesion is no longer intumescent [18].
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) shows elevation of the retinal pigment epithelium corresponding to the lesion with underlying hyporeflectivity [15,19]. It also demonstrates intact lamination of the retinal layers with no associated subretinal or intraretinal fluid. Adjacent OCT scans to a vortex vein ampulla demonstrate dilated, choroidal vessels that appeared to be connected to the vortex vein ampulla, supporting the hypothesis that ampullary engorgement may be affected by localized venous stasis [9,20].
Siddiqui and colleagues reported a case of a patient undergoing pars plana vitrectomy for vitreous opacities, in which an incidentally found vortex vein ampulla varicosity was noted [21]. The authors utilized intraoperative OCT, which demonstrated an elevation of the retinal pigment epithelium and neurosensory retina that reduced in size with scleral depression.

4.2. Literature on the Topic of Associated Systemic and Ocular Conditions

Although no ocular conditions were associated with vortex vein ampulla varicosities in our series, other reports have highlighted such associations. Zhang et al. [22] reported a patient referred for evaluation of a darkly pigmented choroidal mass. On exam, the patient had scleral injections and was diagnosed with scleritis. Funduscopic examination revealed a collapsible choroidal mass. The authors noted that this combination of scleral inflammation and a choroidal mass could be mistaken for melanoma, as melanoma may present with scleritis-like features. They further hypothesized that posterior scleritis-associated inflammation may impair choroidal venous outflow, resulting in transient engorgement of the vortex vein ampulla varix. This hypothesis was supported by the complete resolution of the varix following treatment of scleritis.
Similarly, Cabral et al. [23] reported a case of nodular scleritis associated with a vortex vein ampulla varix. The lesion appeared hypopigmented on fundus exam, and OCT demonstrated a hyporeflective mass in the suprachoroidal space that remained engorged despite changes in gaze or application of ocular pressure. The authors hypothesized that nodular scleral changes may compress the adjacent choroid impeding venous outflow and inducing engorgement of the vortex vein ampulla varix.
Higham et al. [24] described two patients with Donnai-Barrow with vortex vein ampulla varicies that were ectopically located in the macula. Additionally, these patients had high myopia >20 diopters.
In recent years, wide-angle indocyanine green angiography and optical coherence tomography-angiography (OCT-A) of the ocular fundus have demonstrated atypical choroidal vortex vein systems and ampullas located in the posterior fundus, including in juxtapapillary and macular sites, particularly in eyes with high axial myopia [2,3]. These posterior vortex vein ampullas are usually smaller than those that occur in the peripheral fundus and do not appear to be as prone to transient gaze induced congestion compared with their peripheral counterparts. Nevertheless, there are few reports of an occasional transient congestion of a posterior vortex vein ampulla [25,26].
Milani et al. [27] shared a highly myopic patient with a spontaneous suprachoroidal hemorrhage adjacent to a vortex vein ampulla varix. Although the hemorrhage resolved a few weeks later, the varix persisted. The authors suggested that engorged choroidal vessels, often seen in high myopia, may have predisposed the formation of a suprachoroidal hemorrhage.
Studies have associated the development of engorged vortex veins with pachychoroid spectrum diseases, including polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy and central serous chorioretinopathy. Chung et al. [28] hypothesized that in polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy, increased choroidal thickness and vascular hyperpermeability lead to venous congestion and subsequent engorgement of associated vortex veins. There are no published reports of varicosities of the vortex vein ampulla associated with pachychoroid spectrum diseases.

5. Conclusions

Despite substantial research on vortex vein ampulla varicosities, particularly regarding the use of imaging modalities, several aspects of these lesions remain poorly understood. The relationship to refractive error, axial length, and systemic or ocular conditions has not been systematically studied. Additionally, the exact mechanism underlying gaze-induced venous congestion remains speculative. Future studies assessing the relationship between refractive error, axial length, and systemic or ocular conditions, as well as investigations of choroidal blood-flow dynamics may refine our understanding of the factors influencing these lesions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, JJA and ZMC; methodology, JTR; formal analysis, JJA; investigation, JTR, ZMC, RHO, JJA; resources, JJA; data curation, JJA; writing—original draft preparation, JTR; writing—review and editing, ZMC, RHO, JJA; supervision, JJA and ZMC; project administration, JJA; funding acquisition, ZMC and JJA. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding, and the APC was funded by the James J. Augsburger Ocular Oncology Fund, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was performed in accordance with federal and state laws and in adherence to the Declaration of Helsinki tenants. This study was a retrospective diagnostic subgroup study performed under protocol #2024-0054 (Retrospective Studies of Patient Information in Ocular Oncology Research Records, James J. Augsburger, MD, Principal Investigator) approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Cincinnati (Federal wide Assurance #00003152) on 27 March 2024.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets presented in this article are not readily available because the data are part of an ongoing study under IRB supervision. Requests to access the datasets should be directed to James J. Augsburger, MD [AUGSBUJJ@UC.EDU].

Acknowledgments

None.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest related to this publication.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
B-scan Standard B-scan ultrasound
ICGA Indocyanine green angiography
FA Fluorescein Angiography
OCT Optical Coherence Tomography
OCT-A Optical coherence tomography-angiography

References

  1. Osher, R.H.; Abrams, G.W.; Yarian, D.; Armao, D. Varix of the vortex ampulla. Am J Ophthalmol. 1981, 92(5), 653–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Verma, A.; Maram, J.; Alagorie, A.R.; Gupta Nittala, M.; van Hemert, J.; Keane, D.; et al. Distribution and Location of Vortex Vein Ampullae in Healthy Human Eyes as Assessed by Ultra-Widefield Indocyanine Green Angiography. Ophthalmol Retina 2020, 4(5), 530–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. He, G.; Zhang, X.; Zhuang, X.; Zeng, Y.; Gan, Y.; Su, Y.; et al. A Novel Exploration of the Choroidal Vortex Vein System: Incidence and Characteristics of Posterior Vortex Veins in Healthy Eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2024, 65(2), 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Buettner, H. Varix of the vortex ampulla simulating a choroidal melanoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1990, 109(5), 607–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Veronese, C.; Staurenghi, G.; Pellegrini, M.; Maiolo, C.; Primavera, L.; Morara, M.; et al. Multimodal Imaging in Vortex Vein Varices. Retin Cases Brief Rep. 2019, 13(3), 260–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ismail, R.A.; Sallam, A.; Zambarakji, H.J. Optical coherence tomographical findings in a case of varix of the vortex vein ampulla. Br J Ophthalmol. 2011, 95(8), 1169–70, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Vahdani, K.; Kapoor, B.; Raman, V.S. Multiple vortex vein ampulla varicosities. BMJ Case Rep. 2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Suetov, A.A.; Boiko, E.V.; Izmaylov, A.S.; Molodkina, N.A. Vortex vein varix (clinical observations). Vestn Oftalmol. 2022, 138(4), 81–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Fogel Levin, M.; Hostovsky, A.; Fossataro, C.; Caputo, C.G.; Feo, A.; Romano, M.R.; et al. Vortex Vein Varix: Multimodal Imaging and Clinical Correlates. Ophthalmol Retina 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Rutnin, U. Fundus appearance in normal eyes. I. The choroid. Am J Ophthalmol. 1967, 64(5), 821–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Wolfensberger, T.J. [Varix of the vortex ampulla: an unusual differential choroid tumor diagnosis]. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 1997, 210(5), 334–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kang, H.K.; Beaumont, P.E.; Chang, A.A. Indocyanine green angiographic features of varix of the vortex vein ampulla. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2000, 28(4), 321–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Levy, J.; Yagev, R.; Shelef, I.; Lifshitz, T. Varix of the vortex vein ampulla: a small case series. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2005, 15(3), 424–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Rimsaite, A.; Andersen, C.U. [A varix of the vortex vein ampulla is a rare differential diagnosis of malignant melanoma of the choroid]. Ugeskr Laeger 2015, 177(8). [Google Scholar]
  15. Rubegni, G.; Bacci, T.; Tosi, G. Vortex Vein Varix changes with digital pressure: Ultra-Wide-Field imaging and Peripheral OCT report. Am J Ophthalmol. 2025, 272, e5–e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hu, Y.; Wang, S.; Dong, Y.; Zhou, X.; Yu, W.; et al. Imaging Features of Varix of the Vortex Vein Ampulla: A Small Case Series. J Clinic Experiment Ophthalmol 2011, 2, 173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Shields, C.L.; Shields, J.A.; De Potter, P. Patterns of indocyanine green videoangiography of choroidal tumours. Br J Ophthalmol. 1995, 79(3), 237–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. de Carlo, T.E.; Mieler, W. Dynamic Echography of Varix of the Vortex Vein Ampulla. Retin Cases Brief Rep. 2021, 15(5), 548–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Spiess, K.; Elgohary, M.A. Diagnosis of Vortex Varix Using Optical Coherence Tomography and Scleral Indentation. Retin Cases Brief Rep. 2022, 16(3), 362–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rayess, H.; Ehlers, J.P. Utilization of peripheral optical coherence tomography to optimize diagnosis of a vortex vein varix. Retina 2015, 35(4), 838–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Siddiqui, M.Z.; Sanders, R.; Sallam, A.B. Utilization of Intraoperative OCT for the Diagnosis of a Case of Varix of the Vortex Vein. Ophthalmol Retina 2019, 3(6), 522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, X.; Olson, D.J.; DiBernardo, C.; Davis, R.M.; Gordon, K.G.B. Scleritis-associated vortex vein varix masquerading as choroidal melanoma. Can J Ophthalmol. 2018, 53(6), e260–e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Cabral, D.; Nogueira, V. Varix of a Vortex Vein Ampulla Induced by Nodular Scleritis. Retin Cases Brief Rep. 2022, 16(3), 325–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Higham, A.; Hildebrand, G.D.; Graham-Evans, K.A.J.; Gilbert, R.D.; Horton, R.; Hunt, D.; et al. Ectopic vortex veins and varices in Donnai Barrow syndrome. Ophthalmic Genet. 2022, 43(2), 248–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Gass, J.D. Uveal effusion syndrome. A new hypothesis concerning pathogenesis and technique of surgical treatment. Retina 1983, 3(3), 159–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ghadiali, Q.; Tan, A.; Freund, K.B. Unusual Posterior Varix of a Vortex Vein Ampulla. Retin Cases Brief Rep. 2017, 11 Suppl 1, S163–S5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Milani, P.; Mazzola, M.; Bergamini, F. Suprachoroidal haemhorrage and vortex vein varix: A potential association. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2022, 32(1), NP130–NP3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chung, S.E.; Kang, S.W.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, Y.T.; Park, D.Y. Engorgement of vortex vein and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Retina 2013, 33(4), 834–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Weidmayer, S.L.; Demirci, H. The spontaneous resolution of a vortex vein varix: case report. BMC Ophthalmol. 2021, 21(1), 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Snyers, B.; De Potter, P. [Advantages of digital indocyanine green angiography for diagnosing choroidal tumors]. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2002, 25(2), 212–20. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  31. Singh, A.D.; De Potter, P.; Shields, C.L.; Shields, J.A. Indocyanine green angiography and ultrasonography of a varix of vortex vein. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993, 111(9), 1283–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Niu, T.T.; Xiao, Y. Varix of the vortex vein ampulla: a case report and imaging correlation. Front Med (Lausanne) 2025, 12, 1685952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Nitta, K.; Akiyama, H. Different Vortex Vein Anomalies Observed in a Single Case: Macular Vortex Vein in One Eye and Varix of Vortex Vein Ampulla in the Other Eye. Cureus 2024, 16(7), e63668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Murtagh, P.; O'Dwyer, G.; Horgan, N. Vortex Vein Ampulla. Ophthalmology 2021, 128(12), 1707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lopez, P. Varix of the vortex vein ampulla. J Am Optom Assoc. 1986, 57(2), 104–8. [Google Scholar]
  36. Khan, J.; Damato, B.E. Accuracy of choroidal melanoma diagnosis by general ophthalmologists: a prospective study. Eye (Lond) 2007, 21(5), 595–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kang, T.D.; Douglass, A.M.; Ferenczy, S.R.; Say, E.A.; Shields, C.L. In Vivo Hemodynamic Changes of Vortex Vein Varix on Real-Time Video Angiography. Retina 2017, 37(2), e8–e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hunter, J.E. Vortex vein varix. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1983, 60(12), 995–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gunduz, K.; Shields, C.L.; Shields, J.A. Varix of the vortex vein ampulla simulating choroidal melanoma: report of four cases. Retina 1998, 18(4), 343–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Garcia-Bardera, J.; Montolio-Marzo, E.; Etxabe-Avila, H.; Lorenzo-Castro, J.; Garcia-Caride, S. Valsalva-induced changes in vortex vein varices: A comprehensive imaging exploration. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2024, 47(8), 104250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. da Cruz, L.; James, B.; Gray, R.; Elston, J. Multiple vortex vein varices masquerading as choroidal secondaries. Br J Ophthalmol. 1994, 78(10), 800–1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Al-Dahmash, S.A.; AlBloushi, A.F.; Alsarhani, W.K. Multiple giant vortex vein varices masquerading as choroidal metastases. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2021, 44(1), e31–e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Adam, C.R.; Sigler, E.J.; Randolph, J.C.; Calzada, J.I. Submacular choroidal varix simulating chorioretinal folds with metamorphopsia. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2013, 44(6), 596–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2026 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated