Submitted:
11 March 2026
Posted:
12 March 2026
Read the latest preprint version here
Abstract
Summary: The potential of deep learning (DL) in genomic selection (GS) is constrained by the significant technical expertise required to design and implement neural networks. While DL has revolutionized fields like language processing and structural biology, its application in GS has not yet consistently outperformed traditional models like mixed linear models. The key to unlocking DL's power in GS lies in the exploration of network architectures tailored to genomic data, a process that demands intensive programming and poses a barrier for many researchers. To overcome this challenge, we developed Artificial Intelligence for Efficient and Versatile Evaluation and Representation (AI4EVER), a freely available graphical software platform that enables users to explore and apply machine learning (ML) models without any coding. AI4EVER integrates a graphical user interface (GUI) with a Python-based ML backend. The platform currently supports five models: Ridge Regression, Random Forest, Gradient Boosted Decision Trees, Multi-Layer Perceptron, and a customizable Keras-based neural network that can simultaneously predict multiple traits in a single model. A key feature of AI4EVER is optional incorporation of genome-wide association study (GWAS) results (p-values) as feature weights during model training, enabling biologically informed DL workflows. The platform further provides real-time visualization of model performance metrics and automated feature-importance outputs to enhance interpretability. AI4EVER also separates model training and prediction workflows, allowing trained models to be reused for independent prediction datasets. Using a representative maize dataset, we demonstrate that AI4EVER enables access to advanced AI, empowers genomic researchers to accelerate data-driven decision-making in breeding programs, ultimately lowering the barrier to artificial intelligence-enabled genetic improvement in crops and animals and human health management.
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. GWAS-Informed Neural Networks
3. Software Design
4. Modeling and Training
5. Prediction, Visualization, and Interpretation
6. Case Study
7. Limitations and Conclusions
Funding
References
- Achiam, J; Adler, S; Agarwal, S; et al. Gpt-4 technical report. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2303.08774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bellot, P; de Los Campos, G; Pérez-Enciso, M. Can deep learning improve genomic prediction of complex human traits? Genetics 2018, 210, 809–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bernardo, R. Prediction of maize single-cross performance using RFLPs and information from related hybrids. Crop Sci 1994, 34, 20–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anil, R; Borgeaud, S; Alayrac, JB; Yu, J; Soricut, R; Schalkwyk, J; Dai, AM; Hauth, A; Millican, K; Silver, D.; Team G. Gemini: a family of highly capable multimodal models. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2312.11805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gianola, D; Okut, H; Weigel, KA; et al. Predicting complex quantitative traits with Bayesian neural networks: a case study with Jersey cows and wheat. BMC Genet 2011, 12, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jumper, J; Evans, R; Pritzel, A; et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 2021, 596, 583–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Krizhevsky, A; Sutskever, I; Hinton, GE. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 2012, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, A; Feng, B; Xue, B; et al. Deepseek-v3 technical report. arXiv 2024. arXiv:241219437.
- Meuwissen, TH; Hayes, BJ; Goddard, ME. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 2001, 157, 1819–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Montesinos-López, OA; Montesinos-López, A; Pérez-Rodr\’\iguez, P; et al. A review of deep learning applications for genomic selection. BMC Genomics 2021, 22, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Silver, D; Huang, A; Maddison, CJ; et al. Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search. Nature 2016, 529, 484–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).