Submitted:
04 February 2026
Posted:
05 February 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Methods
2.1. Study Design and Population
2.2. Cardiac Imaging Strategy and Study Groups
2.3. Variables and Data Collection
2.4. cPOCUS Protocol
2.5. Statistical Analysis
2.6. Ethical Approval
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Kleindorfer, DO; Towfighi, A; Chaturvedi, S; Cockroft, KM; Gutierrez, J; Lombardi-Hill, D; et al. 2021 guideline for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2021, 52(7), e364–e467, Erratum in: Stroke. 2021;52(7):e483–e484. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pagola, J; Pagola, C; Juega, J; González-Alujas, T; Alvarez-Sabin, J; Molina, CA. The role of echocardiography screening at the stroke unit. Front Neurol. 2020, 11, 1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Teodoro, RS; Sampaio Silva, G; Modolo, GP; Trivellato, SA; de Souza, JT; Luvizutto, GJ; et al. The role of transthoracic echocardiography in the evaluation of patients with ischemic stroke. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021, 8, 710334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pagola, J; González-Alujas, T; Muchada, M; Teixidó, G; Flores, A; De Blauwe, S; et al. Stroke echoscan protocol: a fast and accurate pathway to diagnose embolic strokes. J Neuroimaging 2015, 25(3), 365–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pérez de Isla, L; Díaz Sánchez, S; Pagola, J; García de Casasola Sánchez, G; López Fernández, T; Sánchez Barrancos, IM; et al. Consensus document of the SEMI, semFYC, SEN, and SEC on focused cardiac ultrasound in Spain. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed) 2018, 71(11), 935–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Via, G; Hussain, A; Wells, M; Reardon, R; ElBarbary, M; Noble, VE; et al. International Liaison Committee on Focused Cardiac UltraSound; International Conference on Focused Cardiac UltraSound. International evidence-based recommendations for focused cardiac ultrasound. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2014, 27(7), 683.e1–683.e33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mayo, PH; Beaulieu, Y; Doelken, P; Feller-Kopman, D; Harrod, C; Kaplan, A; et al. American College of Chest Physicians/La Société de Réanimation de Langue Française statement on competence in critical care ultrasonography. Chest 2009, 135(4), 1050–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Labovitz, AJ; Noble, VE; Bierig, M; Goldstein, SA; Jones, R; Kort, S; et al. Focused cardiac ultrasound in the emergent setting: a consensus statement of the American Society of Echocardiography and American College of Emergency Physicians. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010, 23(12), 1225–1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Neskovic, AN; Edvardsen, T; Galderisi, M; Garbi, M; Gullace, G; Jurcut, R; et al. European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Focus cardiac ultrasound: the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging viewpoint. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2014, 15(9), 956–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Beaulieu, Y. Specific skill set and goals of focused echocardiography for critical care clinicians. Crit Care Med. 2007, 35, S144–S149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Amaya-Pascasio, L; Rodríguez-Pardo de Donlebún, J; Arjona-Padillo, A; et al. Point-of-care ultrasound for transient ischemic attack assessment in transient ischemic attack clinics: consensus document of the Spanish Society of Neurosonology. Neurología 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kraft, P; Fleischer, A; Wiedmann, S; Rücker, V; Mackenrodt, D; Morbach, C; et al. Feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care handheld echocardiography in acute ischemic stroke patients: a pilot study. BMC Neurol. 2017, 17(1), 159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Moore, CL; Copel, JA. Point-of-care ultrasonography. N Engl J Med. 2011, 364(8), 749–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kimura, BJ. Point-of-care cardiac ultrasound techniques in the physical examination: better at the bedside. Heart 2017, 103(13), 987–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mark, DG; Hayden, GE; Ky, B; Paszczuk, A; Pugh, M; Matthews, S; et al. Hand-carried echocardiography for assessment of left ventricular filling and ejection fraction in the surgical intensive care unit. J Crit Care 2009, 24(3), 470.e1–470.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dietrich, CF; Goudie, A; Chiorean, L; Cui, XW; Gilja, OH; Dong, Y; et al. Point of care ultrasound: a WFUMB position paper. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2017, 43(1), 49–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Juega, J; Pagola, J; Gonzalez-Alujas, T; Rodriguez-Luna, D; Rubiera, M; Rodriguez-Villatoro, N; et al. Screening of embolic sources by point-of-care ultrasound in the acute phase of ischemic stroke. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2020, 46(9), 2173–2180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- López-Dequidt, I; Martínez-Monzonis, A; Peña-Gil, C; González-Maestro, A; González-Salvado, V; Rodríguez-Castro, E; et al. Results of a focused cardiac ultrasound program conducted by neurologists within a stroke care network with cardiac imaging units. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed) 2023, 76(2), 103–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]


| Total (n=332) |
cPOCUS group* (n=219) |
Control group** (n=113) |
p value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Demographics and comorbidities | ||||
| Female sex, n (%) | 131 (39.6) | 82 (37.6) | 49 (43.4) | 0.30 |
| Age, median (IQR) | 70 (20) | 70 (19) | 70 (21) | 0.05 |
| Hypertension, n (%) | 192 (57.8) | 131 (59.8) | 61 (54) | 0.30 |
| Dyslipidemia, n (%) | 139 (41.9) | 102 (46.6) | 37 (32.7) | 0.02 |
| Diabetes mellitus, n (%) | 112 (33.7) | 78 (35.6) | 34 (30.1) | 0.33 |
| Ischemic heart disease, n (%) | 23 (6.9) | 18 (8.2) | 5 (4.4) | 0.19 |
| Atrial fibrillation, n (%) | 95 (28.6) | 62 (28.3) | 33 (29.2) | 0.86 |
| Smoking, n (%) | 105 (31.6) | 66 (30.1) | 39 (34.5) | 0.42 |
| Alcoholism, n (%) | 26 (7.8) | 17 (7.8) | 9 (8) | 0.95 |
| Drug use, n (%) | 24 (7.2) | 16 (7.3) | 9 (7.96) | 0.74 |
| Vascular territory | ||||
| Anterior/posterior. n (%) | 312 (94) /20 (6) | 218 (94.4) /13 (5.6) | 94 (93.1) /7(6.9) | 0.69 |
| NIHSS, median (IQR) | 5 (9) | 4.5 (7) | 5 (11) | 0.187 |
| Reperfusion treatments | ||||
| Intravenous fibrinolysis, n (%) | 59 (17.8) | 46 (21) | 22 (19.5) | 0.26 |
| Mechanical thrombectomy, n (%) | 70 (21.1) | 54 (24.7) | 16 (14.2) | 0.02 |
| In-hospital complications | ||||
| Lower respiratory tract infection, n (%) | 17 (5.1) | 7 (3.2) | 10 (8.8) | 0.35 |
| Urinary tract infection, n (%) | 19 (5.7) | 13 (5.9) | 6 (5.3) | 0.82 |
| cPOCUS group* (n=207) |
Control group** (n=111) |
|
|---|---|---|
| Left atrial dilation, n (%) | 59 (28.5) | 43 (38.7) |
| Left ventricular dilation, n (%) | 14 (6.8) | 3 (2.7) |
| Left ventricular hypertrophy, n (%) | 93 (45) | 51 (45.9) |
| Segmental hypokinesia, n (%) | 29 (14) | 14 (12.6) |
| Intracavitary masses, n (%) | 4 (1.9) | 2 (1.8) |
| Left atrial masses, n (%) | 1 (0.5) | 0 (0) |
| Mitral insufficiency, n (%) | 42 (20.2) | 26 (23.4) |
| Aortic insufficiency, n (%) | 46 (22.2) | 19 (17.1) |
| Mitral stenosis, n (%) | 14 (6.8) | 3 (2.7) |
| Aortic stenosis, n (%) | 13 (6.3) | 7 (6.3) |
| Left Ventricular Ejection fraction (LVEF) | ||
| - Normal (50%), n (%) | - | 101 (91) |
| - Mild reduction (30 – 50%), n (%) | - | 7 (6.3) |
| - Severe reduction (<30%), n (%) | - | 3 (2.7) |
| Model | Unstandardized Coefficients* | p-value | 95% Confidence Intervale for B | ||
| B | Standard error | Lower limit | Upper limit | ||
| (Constant) | 7.515 | 0.692 | <0.01 | 6.152 | 8.878 |
| cPOCUS group | -1.490 | 0.733 | 0.04 | -2.933 | -0.048 |
| NIHSS | 0.200 | 0.052 | <0.01 | 0.097 | 0.303 |
| Lower respiratory tract infection | 9.467 | 1.574 | <0.01 | 6.368 | 12.565 |
| Posterior vascular territory | 2.552 | 1.366 | 0.06 | -.137 | 5.240 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).