Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Modelling the Probability of Functional Health Literacy Based on Traditional Media Consumption Patterns in High‐Illiteracy Provinces in South Africa

Submitted:

02 January 2026

Posted:

05 January 2026

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
Background and Objectives: Formal education in Africa is becoming increasingly influ-enced by the traditional media consumption, ranging from television and radio to in-ternet usage. This study aims to determine the effects of traditional media consump-tion on health literacy in provinces with high illiteracy. Materials and Method: The study adopted a retrospective cross-sectional study design using the 2016 South Afri-can Demographic Survey Data to analyse the factors affecting health literacy. Partici-pants were selected using a stratified two-stage sampling method to ensure national and provincial representativeness. A total of 1 982 participants aged 15 – 29 years who met the inclusion criteria were included for further analysis. Pearson’s Chi-square test was used to test for association between health literacy and media consumption. Mul-tivariate logistic regression was used to determine the effects of traditional media consumption on health literacy, p ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. STATA version 16.1 (StataCorp, LLC, College Station TX, USA) was used for analysis. Results: The results showed that media consumption emerged as a strong predictor, in-dividuals who reported watching television had increased odds of health literacy (OR = 2.67; 95% CI: 1.55 - 4.61; p < 0.001). Similarly, internet use was positive predictor of health literacy (OR = 3.11; 95% CI: 1.76 - 5.52; p < 0.001. Other variables such as educa-tional level also emerged as a significant predictor, individuals with secondary school education had significantly higher odds of health literacy compared to those with lower educational levels (OR = 17.10; 95% CI: 4.20 - 69.63; p < 0.001). Conclusion: This study highlights the critical role media consumption plays in shaping health literacy outcomes among the youth, particularly in provinces with high illiteracy rates. By us-ing media platforms strategically and ensuring equitable access, educators, health practitioners and policymakers can unlock new pathways to health literacy, fostering a more informed, empowered, and connected society.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Traditional conceptions of education were once centered on printed texts, since early 2001 formal education has becoming increasingly influenced both positively and negatively by the rise of traditional media consumption, such as television, radio, and internet usage [1,2]. In the context of low- and middle-income countries the rise in the use of traditional media consumption presents among others, demographic divide. According to Sitto and Lubinga [3] and Conroy-Krutz et al. [4] radio remain the mostly widely accessed source of traditional media consumption across all demography. However, Conroy-Krutz et al. posit that newspaper, television and internet usage remains inaccessible for most people residing in rural areas and those in the lower wealth index [4]. Several other studies also highlight the persistent demographic divide due to media consumption [3,5]. This demographic inequality if unattended could present severe implications for one of the fundamental components of the United Nations’ sustainable development 2030 agenda being inclusive and equitable quality education for all.
This study focuses on three traditional media consumption, i.e., radio, television, and internet use to measure their incremental effect on health literacy in provinces with high illiteracy. These three media consumptions were selected due to their commonality in the South African and African setting [6,7,8]. Despite the high global usage of internet, it remains low in the African region [6,8]. Eastern Cape, KwaZulu Nata, Mpumalanga, and North West, like the broader South Africa, faces a significant health burden, characterized by high prevalence rates of mental disorders, human immune virus and inequalities in service accessibility [9,10,11,12,13]. A major health crisis facing the South African health system is the treatment gap, with reports indicating that nearly 75% of people with health issues in South Africa do not have access to any form of healthcare [10,12]. This is due to a shortage of healthcare professionals, limited resources, and uneven distribution of services as a consequence of department of health budget cuts and mismanagement of funds [12,14]. Health literacy becomes a critical aspect to addressing the persistent health divide and service inequalities, particularly in provinces with high illiteracy.
Several studies show that traditional media consumption and health literacy are positively correlated, particularly that participants who have higher education level have increased levels of health literacy compared to those with primary and no formal education [15,16]. Additionally, other factors such as age, gender, and financial stability, among others, were also significant correlates of health literacy [17,18,19,20]. de Oliveira Collet et al. on the other hand reports that participants with higher health literacy levels often conduct research on their health status and seek for healthcare providers through digital platforms [21]. Ye further report that participants health literacy is increased by their frequent usage of digital media for health-related resources [22]. Cramer et al. showed that most participants reported having stable internet connection at their residences, however, their frequency of obtaining health related resources was minimal, with less than 3% reporting that they made doctor’s appointment through the internet [23].
Most of the studies on traditional and digital media consumption are concentrated on the covid-19 effects [24,25,26,27]], while others where focused on digital literacy of learners in schools [28,29], and university students [26,27]. However, fewer studies have focused particularly on the effects of traditional media platforms pre-covid-19, specifically in constrained and remote areas where digital media is infrequent and traditional media proliferates. Research has demonstrated that traditional media carries great potential to raise awareness and orientate residents in remote areas concerning current affairs and breaking news [6,7,8]. However, in low- and middle-income countries, including South Africa, studies of this nature are less concentrated. To our knowledge, this is the first study which seeks to assess the effects of traditional media consumption on health literacy in provinces with reported high illiteracy in South Africa utilizing the pre-covid-19 South African Demographic Health Survey (2016 SADHS) data.

2. Materials and Methods

The study adopted a retrospective cross-sectional study design using data from the 2016 South African Demographic and Health Survey. Data were collected between June 27 and November 4, 2016, through structured questionnaires administered to a representative sample of individuals across various provinces in South Africa. The SADHS 2016 included all men aged 15 – 59 and women 15 – 49, who were residing in one of the nine provinces 24 hours prior to the survey. The Statistics South Africa and South African Medical Research Council sampled a total of 12 132 individuals, of which 8,514 women (age 15-49) and 3,618 men (age 15-59). The survey used the 2011 South African population census as the master sampling frame and employed a stratified two-stage random sampling technique. In the first stage, enumeration areas (EAs) were stratified by province and urban or non-urban status. In the second stage, households were randomly selected from each EA. To effectively use this rigorously determined sample size and ensure continuity and statistical power, this study integrated and analyzed all respondents from the original dataset who had complete in-formation on health literacy and were between 15 to 29 years of age and residing in provinces with high illiteracy (Eastern Cape, Limpopo, Mpumalanga, and North West). Data were gathered on various demographic, socioeconomic, educational and frequency of media consumption variables.
The variables included age, gender, marital status, education level, employment status, wealth index, type of residence, and province of residence. Additionally, information on participants' traditional media exposure (that is, listening to radio, watching television, and using the internet) were collected from June to November 2016, using two questionnaires for males and females, the questionnaires are available online (https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR337/FR337.pdf) [30]. The South African Demographic and Health Survey (SADHS) employed standardized DHS instruments, recognized globally for their methodological rigor and established face validity. Data collection was conducted by extensively trained field workers, with each team supervised by a senior professional nurse to ensure procedural trustworthiness. The instruments were uniformly administered across all provinces, enhancing both the reliability, validity, and cross-regional comparability of the data. Data were extracted from the .DTA files and exported to Microsoft Excel using STATA version 16.1 (StataCorp, Texas, USA) for further editing and recoding. The Excel spreadsheet was then exported to STATA for further analysis.
Continuous data were tested for normality and data represented as mean and standard deviation. Categorical data were represented using frequencies and percentages. To test for association between health literacy and socioeconomic and demographic factors, and traditional media exposure, Chi-square tests were employed, variables with a p-value less than 0.05 were assumed to be statistically significant. Univariate analysis was conducted to identify significant determinants affecting reading literacy for both genders. Variables with a p-value less than 0.25 were considered for inclusion in the multivariate model [31]. In the multivariate model, variables having a p-value less than 0.05 were statistically significant. The univariate and multivariate models were also used to determine the odds ratios for factors affecting reading literacy, while adjusting for potential confounders. All identifiers which could assist in identifying study participants were de-linked from the dataset, participants were informed of the purpose of the survey and that they can withdraw at any stage without any reason. The survey protocol (SADHS 2016) was reviewed and approved by the SAMRC Ethics Committee and the ICF Institutional Review Board [30].

3. Results

The study included 1 982 participants with a mean age of 21.60±4.33 years (range: 15 – 29). Of these, 1035 (52.22%) were females, and 743 (37.49) belonged to the age group 15 – 19 years. Most of the participants 576 (54.69%) were found in the KwaZulu-Natal province, furthermore, 1322 (66.70%) of the participants resided in rural areas across the four provinces. Over 80% of the study participants attained secondary education, while 1730 (87.29) of them were single. Additionally, most of the participants 1510 (76.19%) were unemployed, and 966 (48.74%) were classified as low class in the wealth index. Regarding media consumption and internet usage, 1366 (68.92%) listened to radio, 1614 (81.43%) watched television, and 1118 (56.41%) used internet, respectively. Table 1 summarizes participants demographic profiles.
Participants health literacy illiteracy was significantly associated with being male, situated in the Limpopo province, and residing in rural areas. Additionally, having no formal education, and being a widow were also associated with high illiteracy levels, worth noting was that employment status, particularly being employed was associated with high illiteracy in these four provinces. Regarding media consumption, participants who were not exposed to any form of media consumption and internet usage had high illiteracy levels. Table 2 summarize the results on association between health literacy and key sociodemographic and behavioural correlates, including gender, age, province, residential setting, educational attainment, and media consumption habits, among others.
To determine the determinants of health literacy, both bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted. The multivariate model incorporated key sociodemographic and behavioral variables, including gender, age, province, residential setting, educational attainment, and media consumption habits, among others. Of these, educational attainment emerged as a strong predictor, individuals with secondary school education had significantly higher odds of higher health literacy compared to those with lower educational levels (OR = 17.10; 95% CI: 4.20 - 69.63; p < 0.001). Media consumption also showed notable health literacy levels. Participants who reported watching television had increased odds of health literacy (OR = 2.67; 95% CI: 1.55 - 4.61; p < 0.001), suggesting that televised health content may play a meaningful role in disseminating public health information. Similarly, internet use was positively associated with health literacy (OR = 3.11; 95% CI: 1.76 - 5.52; p < 0.001), indicating that digital platforms may serve as effective channels for health education and awareness. Table 3 summarizes the univariate and bivariate analysis of factors influencing participants’ health literacy.

4. Discussion

This study aimed to investigate the determinants of health literacy among the participants aged 15 to 29 years old in South Africa using the 2016 SADHS. The logistic regression analysis revealed that covariates such as gender, educational level, watching television and internet usage were significant predictor of higher health literacy. Females consistently outperformed their male counterparts in health literacy, a finding consistent with several other studies [32,33,34]. In consistently, Heizomi et al. showed that Iranian males were better at reading skills, accessing, and using health information compared to females [35]. Similarly, Shabi and Oyewusi also showed that males in Nigeria had higher health literacy compared to their female counterpart [36]. These gendered differences might be influenced by societal norms, communication styles, and cultural factors that shape how individuals’ approach and engage with health-related information.
Individuals with secondary school education were significantly more likely to exhibit higher health literacy (OR = 17.10; 95% CI: 4.20 - 69.63; p < 0.001) compared to other groups. Several studies also report the significant effect of level of education on health literacy, particularly that participants who have higher education level had increased levels of health literacy compared to those with primary and no formal education [15,16]. The reason for the strong effect could be due to the fact that formal education has potential to equip individuals with the cognitive and functional skills necessary to access, comprehend, and apply health information effectively [37,38,39,40]. Moreover, several other studies have also reported that health literacy depends upon several other factors apart from educational attainment, this includes age, gender, and financial stability, among others [17,18,19,20]. Suggesting that educational attainment is not a superior factor to achieve equitable health literacy, all factors should be considered. Thus, it is important for practitioners and policy makers to consider context and specific needs of the people and communities when crafting interventions and campaign programs.
The study further reported the effect of watching television (OR = 2.67; 95% CI: 1.55 - 4.61; p < 0.001) on health literacy, indicating that televised content may serve as an effective medium for disseminating health information and improving individual’s health literacy. This finding was consistent with several other studies [41,42]. The reason for the significant effect could be that health-related programs whether through public service announcements, documentaries, or entertainment formats contribute meaningfully to public understanding of health-related issues [41,43,44].
Additionally given television’s broad reach across diverse demographic groups in South Africa, it presents a valuable platform for large-scale health promotion campaigns and awareness, particularly in provinces with high illiteracy and places with poor health services delivery. Although the present study found a statistically significant effect between television viewing and literacy, other studies have shown no link between television and viewing and literacy, particularly that television viewing destructs individuals from other important educational activities [45,46,47,48]. Milshtein and Henik argue that reading is an act for manipulating cognitive process and allows for a deeper narrative comprehension, though no relation between television and reading was considered [49].
The logistic regression analysis further revealed that internet use was a significant predictor of participants health literacy. Particularly, individuals who reported using the internet had three-fold odds of higher health literacy compared to those who did not (OR = 3.11, 95% CI: 1.76 - 5.52, p < 0.001). Consistent with the current finding, de Oliveira Collect et al., reported that participants with higher health literacy levels often conduct research on their health status and seek for healthcare providers through internet platforms [22]. Ye further report that participants health literacy is increased by their frequent usage of the internet for health-related resources. Inconsistently, Cramer et al. showed diverging finding, that is, most participants reported having stable internet connection at their residences, however, their frequency of obtaining health related resources was minimal, with less than 3% reporting that they made doctor’s appointment through the internet [23].
This could suggest that while internet access is available, it is directed to other activities other than sourcing of health-related information. Furthermore, Shi et al. also reported the low levels of health literacy and further highlighting that the low usage of internet and social media platforms may have been a contributing factor [50]. Zhao et al. similarly showed the effects of internet usage in increasing participants health literacy levels, particularly, participants who used internet frequently for health-related information had increased levels of health literacy [51]. The reason for the study finding could be that digital access play a crucial role in empowering individuals with health-related knowledge [52,53].

4.1. Implications for Theory and Practice

The findings of this study have important implications for theory and practice. Firstly, while television viewing can positively influence health literacy, its impact depends on content; therefore, parental supervision in selecting appropriate programs for adolescents and young adults is essential. Secondly, evidence from Ware et al. (2024) indicates that initiatives such as LifeLab-Soweto can enhance health literacy among youth [54]. Extending similar programs to high-illiteracy provinces through collaboration between health, education, and private sectors could yield significant benefits. Thirdly, Okanmelu et al. (2025) demonstrated that multi-media education-entertainment (MM-EE) interventions improve food and nutrition literacy among community health workers (CHWs) [55]. Given their critical role in disseminating health information, adapting MM-EE for CHWs in rural and township areas could strengthen community-level health education. Finally, educational practitioners should consider integrating content from LifeLab-Soweto and MM-EE interventions into subjects such as Life Orientation to raise awareness and promote health literacy among adolescents and young adults.

5. Conclusions

The present study underpinned the incremental effect of traditional media consumption, particularly, that television viewing, radio listening and internet usage has significant effect in shaping the health literacy outcomes of adolescents and young adults in provinces with high illiteracy in South Africa. Educational attainment, particularly completion of secondary schooling, demonstrated the greatest effect on health literacy, reaffirming the critical interplay between formal education and access to health-related information. The results suggest that traditional media platforms, when strategically leveraged, can serve as effective conduits for dissemination of health education, especially in resource-constrained settings where health services remain infrequent. Moreover, television’s broad reach and the growing penetration of internet services present unique opportunities for targeted health campaigns aimed at adolescents and young adults in provinces with high illiteracy. However, disparities in access driven by geography, socioeconomic status, and gender divide, highlight the need for context-sensitive interventions that integrate media-based strategies with educational and community-level interventions. By bridging the gap between health information dissemination and comprehension, policymakers, educators, and community healthcare practitioners can foster a more health-literate society. Future research should prioritize equitable media access, culturally relevant content, and collaborative programs that combine traditional media with school-based health literacy interventions. Such approaches are essential for advancing the Sustainable Development Goal of inclusive and equitable quality education while addressing persistent health inequities in South Africa.

6. Recommendations

This study offers three key recommendations. First, parents and legal guardians should actively supervise and select the television content viewed by adolescents and young adults in their households. Second, stakeholders and educators in provinces with high illiteracy should explore the feasibility of integrating programs such as LifeLab-Soweto and MM-EE into subjects like Life Orientation to enhance awareness of health-related information. Finally, provincial governments should prioritize recruiting CHWs who play a critical role in disseminating health information within these high-illiteracy regions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, O.P.M.; methodology, S.M.S.; software, O.P.M.; validation, O.P.M., and S.M.S.; formal analysis, O.P.M.; investigation, S.M.S.; data curation, O.P.M.; writing—original draft preparation, O.P.M.; writing—review and editing, S.M.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

None.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by The survey protocol (SADHS 2016) was reviewed and approved by the SAMRC Ethics Committee and the ICF Institutional Review Board. See link for description https://www.datafirst.uct.ac.za/dataportal/index.php/catalog/729.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study. Link for description https://www.datafirst.uct.ac.za/dataportal/index.php/catalog/729.

Data Availability Statement

Data are publicly available at data first repository. Link: https://www.datafirst.uct.ac.za/dataportal/index.php/catalog/729.

Acknowledgments

The authors have reviewed and edited the output and take full responsibility for the content of this publication.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
CHW Community healthcare workers
HSRC The Human Sciences Research Council
ICF Inner-City Fund
MM-EE Multi-media education entertainment
SADHS South African Demographic Health Survey
SAMRC South African Medical Research Council

References

  1. Dejene, W. . Conceptions of teaching & learning and teaching approach preference: Their change through preservice teacher education program. Cogent education, 7(1), 1833812. 2020. [CrossRef]
  2. Nabhan, S. . Conceptions of Literacy in English Language Education Context. In 2nd Annual Conference on Social Science and Humanities (ANCOSH 2020) (pp. 203-206). Atlantis Press. 2021. [CrossRef]
  3. Sitto, K., & Lubinga, E. . Radio and digital convergence in South Africa. In Radio, Public Life and Citizen Deliberation in South Africa (pp. 176-195). Routledge. 2021. [CrossRef]
  4. Conroy-Krutz, J., Amakoh, K., & Amewunou, K. . Africa’s shifting media landscapes: Digital media use grows, but so do demographic divides. Link: https://www.afrobarometer.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/AD800-PAP14-Digital-media-use-grows-across-Africa%5ELJ-but-so-do-demographic-divides-Afrobarometer-29april24.pdf 2024.
  5. Liu, Y., Zheng, L., & Qian, W. . How rural residents access news and its influence on social trust: based on the data of the China family panel studies. Sustainability, 15(4), 3269. 2023. [CrossRef]
  6. Libuseng M. . “Digital Divide: Who in Africa Is Connected and Who Is Not.” Afrobarometer, Dispatch No. 582, 14 December. Accessed 12 December 2025. https://www.afrobarometer.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/AD582-PAP18-Digital-divide-Who-in-Africa-is-connected-and-who-is-not-Afrobarometer-Pan-Africa-Profile-13dec22.pdf 2022.
  7. Tanya B. . “Radio Is Thriving in South Africa: 80% Are Tuning In”, The Conversation, 11 February. Accessed 12 December 2025. https://theconversation.com/radio-is-thriving-in-south-africa-80-are-tuning-in-176846. 2022.
  8. van Wyk-Khosa S, Ndumbu R, and Krönke M. . PP95: Africa’s digital divide is closing, but participation in the digital(ised) economy remains highly uneven. Available at: https://www.afrobarometer.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/PP95-Digital-divide-in-Africa-closing-but-participation-in-digitalised-economy-still-uneven-Afrobarometer-23aug25.pdf 2025.
  9. Bantjes, J., Lochner, C., Saal, W., Roos, J., Taljaard, L., Page, D., ... & Stein, D. J. . Prevalence and sociodemographic correlates of common mental disorders among first-year university students in post-apartheid South Africa: implications for a public mental health approach to student wellness. BMC public health, 19(1), 922. 2019. [CrossRef]
  10. South African College of Applied Psychology. The shocking state of mental health in South Africa in 2019. 2019. Available at: https://www.sacap.edu.za/blog/management-leadership/mental-health-south-africa/.
  11. Akullian, A., Vandormael, A., Miller, J. C., Bershteyn, A., Wenger, E., Cuadros, D., ... & Tanser, F. . Large age shifts in HIV-1 incidence patterns in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(28), e2013164118. 2021. [CrossRef]
  12. Sorsdahl, K., Petersen, I., Myers, B., Zingela, Z., Lund, C., & Van der Westhuizen, C. . A reflection of the current status of the mental healthcare system in South Africa. SSM-Mental Health, 4, 100247. 2023. [CrossRef]
  13. Human Sciences Research Council (HSRC). . KwaZulu-Natal reports second-highest HIV prevalence rate in South Africa. 2024. Accessed 12 December 2025. https://hsrc.ac.za/press-releases/phsb/kwazulu-natal-reports-second-highest-hiv-prevalence-rate-in-south-africa/.
  14. Ndlovu, N., Blose, N., & Mokganya, M. . Health and related indicators: a mental health focus. South African Health Review, 27, 175-239. 2025. [CrossRef]
  15. Andiwijaya, F. R., Kadriyan, H., & Syamsun, A. . Education level as a predictor for health literacy levels in a rural community health centre. In 2nd Global Health and Innovation in conjunction with 6th ORL Head and Neck Oncology Conference (ORLHN 2021) (pp. 273-277). Atlantis Press. 2022. [CrossRef]
  16. Tayyem, R., Qasrawi, R., Al Sabbah, H., Amro, M., Issa, G., Thwib, S., ... & Kong, J. D. . The impact of digital literacy and internet usage on health behaviors and decision-making in Arab MENA countries. Technology in Society, 102911. 2025. [CrossRef]
  17. Svendsen, M. T., Bak, C. K., Sørensen, K., Pelikan, J., Riddersholm, S. J., Skals, R. K., ... & Torp-Pedersen, C. . Associations of health literacy with socioeconomic position, health risk behavior, and health status: a large national population-based survey among Danish adults. BMC public health, 20(1), 565. 2020. [CrossRef]
  18. Long, Y., Jia, C., Luo, X., Sun, Y., Zuo, W., Wu, Y., ... & Lin, Z. . The impact of higher education on health literacy: a comparative study between urban and rural China. Sustainability, 14(19), 12142. 2022. [CrossRef]
  19. Sun, S., Lu, J., Wang, Y., Wang, Y., Wu, L., Zhu, S., ... & Xu, H. . Gender differences in factors associated with the health literacy of hospitalized older patients with chronic diseases: A cross-sectional study. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 944103. 2022. [CrossRef]
  20. Kwon, D. H., & Kwon, Y. D. . Patterns of health literacy and influencing factors differ by age: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health, 25(1), 1556. 2025. [CrossRef]
  21. de Oliveira Collet, G., de Morais Ferreira, F., Ceron, D. F., de Lourdes Calvo Fracasso, M., & Santin, G. C. . Influence of digital health literacy on online health-related behaviors influenced by internet advertising. BMC Public Health, 24(1), 1949 2024. [CrossRef]
  22. Ye, W. . The impact of internet health information usage habits on older adults’e-health literacy. Digital Health, 10, 20552076241253473. 2024. [CrossRef]
  23. Cramer, A., Keinki, C., Saur, F., Walter, S., & Hübner, J. . Ehealth literacy, internet and eHealth service usage: a survey among a German municipality. Journal of Public Health, 33(1), 237-248. 2025. [CrossRef]
  24. Alomiry, H. . Information Consumption During Covid–19. The Open Public Health Journal, 15(1). 2022. [CrossRef]
  25. Arnaud, Y., Drouin, O., & Borgès Da Silva, R. . Covid-19 related information seeking: the impact of media on parental concerns. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 977634. 2022. [CrossRef]
  26. Csorba, L. M., & Dabija, D. C. . The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on students’ future online education behaviour. Heliyon, 10(20). 2024. [CrossRef]
  27. Yang, Z., Gray, S., Sparkes, M., Hack-Polay, D., & Ban, Z. . Influence of COVID-19 on Social Media Usage: Association with Mental Well-Being in Undergraduate Students. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 10, p. 1645780). Frontiers. 2025. [CrossRef]
  28. Khumalo, M. A. . Enhancing Digital Literacy for Learners in Inclusive Primary and Secondary Education in Lesotho. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 6(2), 12-21. 2025. [CrossRef]
  29. Zakir, S., Hoque, M. E., Susanto, P., Nisaa, V., Alam, M. K., Khatimah, H., & Mulyani, E. . Digital literacy and academic performance: the mediating roles of digital informal learning, self-efficacy, and students’ digital competence. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 10, p. 1590274). Frontiers Media SA. 2025. [CrossRef]
  30. South African National Department of Health, South African Medical Reserach Council, Statistics South Africa. Demographic and Health Survey 2016, South Africa [dataset]. Version 1. Pretoria: NDoH, SAMRC, Statistics SA [producers], 2019. Cape Town: DataFirst [distributor], 2025. [CrossRef]
  31. Hosmer Jr, D. W., Lemeshow, S., & Sturdivant, R. X. . Applied logistic regression. John Wiley & Sons. 2013. [CrossRef]
  32. Chakraverty, D., Baumeister, A., Aldin, A., Seven, Ü. S., Monsef, I., Skoetz, N., ... & Kalbe, E. . Gender differences of health literacy in persons with a migration background: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ open, 12(7), e056090. 2022. [CrossRef]
  33. Gökşen, A., Erden, Z., & Kınıklı, G. İ. . Investigation of health literacy by gender in individuals receiving physiotherapy and rehabilitation services. Journal of Exercise Therapy and Rehabilitation, 9(3), 205-213. 2022. [CrossRef]
  34. Boyle, P., Mitchell, O. S., Mottola, G. R., & Yu, L. . Declining financial and health literacy among older men and women. The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, 30, 100547. 2025. [CrossRef]
  35. Heizomi, H., Iraji, Z., Vaezi, R., Bhalla, D., Morisky, D. E., & Nadrian, H. . Gender differences in the associations between health literacy and medication adherence in hypertension: a population-based survey in Heris County, Iran. Vascular health and risk management, 157-166. 2020. [CrossRef]
  36. Shabi, I. N., & Oyewusi, F. . Gender perspectives and health literacy proficiencies of In-school adolescents in Osun State, Nigeria. Journal of Health Information and Librarianship, 56-68. 2020. Available at: https://johil.org/index.php/johil/article/view/28.
  37. Muscat, D. M., Smith, S., Dhillon, H. M., Morony, S., Davis, E. L., Luxford, K., ... & McCaffery, K. . Incorporating health literacy in education for socially disadvantaged adults: an Australian feasibility study. International Journal for Equity in Health, 15(1), 84. 2016. [CrossRef]
  38. Bayati, T., Dehghan, A., Bonyadi, F., & Bazrafkan, L. . Investigating the effect of education on health literacy and its relation to health-promoting behaviors in health center. Journal of education and health promotion, 7(1), 127. 2018. DOI: . [CrossRef]
  39. Raghupathi, V., & Raghupathi, W. . The influence of education on health: an empirical assessment of OECD countries for the period 1995–2015. Archives of public health, 78(1), 20. 2020. [CrossRef]
  40. Estrela, M., Leitão, C., Neto, V., Martins, B., Santos, J., Branquinho, A., ... & Herdeiro, M. T. . Educational interventions for the adoption of healthy lifestyles and improvement of health literacy: a systematic review. Public Health, 245, 105788. 2025. [CrossRef]
  41. Özkan, S., Tüzün, H., Dikmen, A. U., Aksakal, N. B., Çalışkan, D., Taşçı, Ö., & Güneş, S. C. . The relationship between health literacy level and media used as a source of health-related information. HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice, 5(2), e109-e117. 2021. [CrossRef]
  42. Ibrahim, A. M., Sanda, H. U., Kurfi, M. Y., & Ibrahim, A. T. . The Use of Social Television in Interactive Health Communication with Implications for Media Literacy. Медиаoбразoвание, (3), 398-407. 2024. [CrossRef]
  43. Rehman, A. U., Zakar, R., Zakar, M. Z., Hani, U., Wrona, K. J., & Fischer, F. . Role of the media in health-related awareness campaigns on perception of COVID-19: a pre-post study in the general population of Pakistan. Frontiers in public health, 9, 779090. 2021. [CrossRef]
  44. Al-Dmour, H., Masa’deh, R. E., Salman, A., Al-Dmour, R., & Abuhashesh, M. . The role of mass media interventions on promoting public health knowledge and behavioral social change against COVID-19 pandemic in Jordan. Sage Open, 12(1), 21582440221082125. 2022. [CrossRef]
  45. Khan, K. S., Purtell, K. M., Logan, J., Ansari, A., & Justice, L. M. . Association between television viewing and parent-child reading in the early home environment. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 38(7), 521-527. 2017. [CrossRef]
  46. Supper, W., Guay, F., & Talbot, D. . The relation between television viewing time and reading achievement in elementary school children: A test of substitution and inhibition hypotheses. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 580763. 2021. [CrossRef]
  47. Karani, N. F., Sher, J., & Mophosho, M. . The influence of screen time on children’s language development: A scoping review. South African Journal of Communication Disorders, 69(1), 825. 2022. [CrossRef]
  48. Gong, Q., & Tao, T. . The relationship between short video usage and academic achievement among elementary school students: The mediating effect of attention and the moderating effect of parental short video usage. Plos one, 19(11), e0309899. 2024. [CrossRef]
  49. Milshtein, D., & Henik, A. . Why should reading (books) be preferable to watching (television)?. In Applying the science of learning to education: An insight into the mechanisms that shape learning (pp. 115-133). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. 2024. [CrossRef]
  50. Shi, Z., Du, X., Li, J., Hou, R., Sun, J., & Marohabutr, T. . Factors influencing digital health literacy among older adults: A scoping review. Frontiers in public health, 12, 1447747. 2024. [CrossRef]
  51. Zhao, B. Y., Huang, L., Cheng, X., Chen, T. T., Li, S. J., Wang, X. J., ... & Li, H. . Digital health literacy and associated factors among internet users from China: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health, 24(1), 908. 2024. [CrossRef]
  52. Fitzpatrick, P. J. . Improving health literacy using the power of digital communications to achieve better health outcomes for patients and practitioners. Frontiers in Digital Health, 5, 1264780. 2023. [CrossRef]
  53. Maha, C. C., Kolawole, T. O., & Abdul, S. . Revolutionizing community health literacy: The power of digital health tools in rural areas of the US and Africa. GSC Advanced Research and Reviews, 19(02), 286-296. 2024. [CrossRef]
  54. Ware, L. J., Kubheka, D., Mdladlamba, T., Mabetha, K., Hanson, M., Godfrey, K. M., ... & Norris, S. . Feasibility Testing of a Health Literacy Intervention With Adolescents and Young Adults in South Africa: The LifeLab Soweto Programme. Health Expectations, 27(6), e70121. 2024. [CrossRef]
  55. Okanmelu, E. C., Sekgala, M. D., Delobelle, P., Alaba, O., Holliday, N., Hill, J., ... & Mchiza, Z. J. . Supporting community health workers in South Africa for context-specific food and nutrition literacy: implementation of a multi-media education-entertainment intervention. BMC nutrition, 11(1), 144. 2025. [CrossRef]
Table 1. Participants demographic characteristics.
Table 1. Participants demographic characteristics.
Variables n (%)
Gender
Female 1035 (52.22)
Male 947 (47.78)
Age
15 – 19 743 (37.49)
20 – 24 640 (32.29)
25 – 29 599 (30.22)
Province
Eastern Cape 508 (25.63)
KwaZulu-Natal 576 (54.69)
Mpumalanga 518 (26.14)
North-West 380 (19.17)
Residence
Rural 1322 (66.70)
Urban 660 (33.30)
Level of education
No education 11 (0.55)
Primary 218 (11)
Secondary 1620 (81.74)
Higher 133 (6.71)
Marital Status
Single 1730 (87.29)
Cohabiting 130 (6.66)
Married 118 (5.95)
Divorced 2 (0.1)
Widow 2 (0.1)
Employment
Unemployed 1510 (76.19)
Employed 472 (23.81)
Wealth index
Lower class 966 (48.74)
Middle class 479 (24.17)
Upper class 537 (27.09)
Media consumption
Listen to radio
Yes 1366 (68.92)
No 616 (31.08)
Watch television
Yes 1614 (81.43)
No 368 (18.57)
Use internet
Yes 1118 (56.41)
No 864 (43.59)
Table 2. Association between health literacy and key sociodemographic and behavioural correlates.
Table 2. Association between health literacy and key sociodemographic and behavioural correlates.
Variables Literacy p-value
Yes No
Gender
Female 1008 (97.39%) 27 (2.61%) 0.003
Male 877 (92.16%) 70 (7.39%) < 0.001
Age
15 – 19 712 (95.83%) 31 (4.17%) 0.249
20 – 24 601 (93.91%) 39 (6.09%) 0.087
25 – 29 572 (95.49%) 27 (4.51%) 0.600
Province
Eastern Cape 488 (98.06%) 20 (3.94%) 0.246
Limpopo 535 (92.88%) 41 (7.12%) 0.003
Mpumalanga 505 (97.49%) 13 (2.51%) 0.003
North-West 357 (93.95%) 23 (6.05%) 0.244
Residence
Rural 1248 (94.40%) 74 (5.60%) 0.040
Urban 637 (96.52%) 23 (3.48%) 0.040
Level of education
No education 6 (54.55%) 5 (45.45) < 0.001
Primary 178 (81.65%) 40 (18.35%) < 0.001
Secondary 1568 (96.79%) 52 (3.21%) < 0.001
Higher 133 (100%) 0 (0%) 0.007
Marital Status
Single 1651 (95.43%) 79 (4.57%) 0.077
Cohabiting 123 (94.62%) 7 (5.38%) 0.789
Married 108 (91.53%) 10 (8.47%) 0.063
Divorced 2 (100%) 0 (0%) 0.748
Widow 1 (50%) 1 (50%) 0.003
Employment
Unemployed 1446 (95.76%) 64 (4.24%) 0.016
Employed 439 (93.01%) 33 (6.99%) 0.016
Wealth index
Lower class 913 (94.51%) 53 (5.49%) 0.233
Middle class 455 (94.99%) 24 (5.01%) 0.892
Upper class 517 (96.28%) 20 (3.72%) 0.141
Media consumption
Listen to radio
Yes 1308 (95.75%) 58 (4.25%) 0.046
No 577 (93.67%) 39 (6.33%) 0.046
Watch television
Yes 1554 (96.28%) 60 (3.72%) < 0.001
No 331 (89.95%) 37 (10.05%) < 0.001
Use internet
Yes 1098 (98.21%) 20 (1.79%) < 0.001
No 787 (91.09%) 77 (8.91%) < 0.001
Table 3. Univariate and Bivariate analysis of factors influencing health literacy.
Table 3. Univariate and Bivariate analysis of factors influencing health literacy.
Variables Bivariate model Multivariate model
OR (95%CI) p-value OR (95%CI) p-value
Gender
Female 1 1 1 1
Male 0.34 (0.21, 0.53) < 0.001 0.31 (0.18, 0.54) < 0.001
Age
15 – 19 1 1 1 1
20 – 24 0.67 (0.41, 1.09) 0.106 0.56 (0.32, 1.00) 0.051
25 – 29 0.92 (0.54, 1.56) 0.764 0.84 (0.43, 1.63) 0.598
Province
North-West 1 1 1 1
Eastern Cape 1.57 (0.85, 2.91) 0.149 2.1 (1.03, 4.29) 0.041
Mpumalanga 0.84 (0.50, 1.43) 0.519 0.54 (0.29, 1.01) 0.055
Limpopo 2.50 (1.25, 5.01) 0.010 1.69 (0.79, 3.62) 0.173
Residence
Rural 1 1 1 1
Urban 1.64 (1.02, 2.65) 0.042 1.08 (0.62, 1.88) 0.792
Level of education
No education 1 1 1 1
Primary 3.71 (1.08, 12.76) 0.038 3.65 (0.89, 15.07) 0.073
Secondary 25.13 (7.43, 84.99) < 0.001 17.10 (4.20, 69.63) < 0.001
Marital Status
Married 1 1 1 1
Cohabiting 1.63 (0.60, 4.42) 0.340 1.21 (0.38, 3.84) 0.744
Single 1.94 (0.97, 3.84) 0.059 1.77 (0.76, 4.08) 0.187
Widow 0.09 (0.005, 1.60) 0.101 0.09 (0.004, 1.99) 0.129
Employment
Unemployed 1 1 1 1
Employed 0.59 (0.38, 0.91) 0.017 0.69 (0.40, 1.20) 0.189
Wealth index
Lower class 1 1 1 1
Middle class 1.10 (0.67, 1.81) 0.705 0.74 (0.41, 1.34) 0.320
Upper class 1.50 (0.89, 2.54) 0.130 0.74 (0.39, 1.42) 0.366
Media consumption
Listen to radio
No 1 1 1 1
Yes 1.52 (1.00, 2.31) 0.048 1.07 (0.65, 1.77) 0.780
Watch television
No 1 1 1 1
Yes 2.90 (1.89, 4.44) < 0.001 2.67 (1.55, 4.61) < 0.001
Use internet
No 1 1 1 1
Yes 5.37 (3.26, 8.86) < 0.001 3.11 (1.76, 5.52) < 0.001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2026 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated