Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Trends in Women’s Empowerment and Their Association with Childhood Vaccination in Cambodia: Evidence from Demographic and Health Surveys (2010–2022)

Submitted:

20 November 2025

Posted:

21 November 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract

Background: Women’s empowerment has been significantly associated with improved child health outcomes. Cambodia, amid rapid socioeconomic transition, offers a critical setting to examine how women’s empowerment influences child immunization. This study evaluated changes in women’s empowerment from 2010 to 2022 and examined its association with the completion of child vaccinations within the first two years of life. Methods: Data from the Cambodia Demographic and Health Surveys conducted in 2010, 2014, and 2021–22, encompassing 9,222 women with recent births, were analyzed. Empowerment was measured across literacy and information access, employment, and decision-making domains. Multinomial logistic regression assessed associations between empowerment factors and completion of oral polio (OPV), diphtheria–tetanus–pertussis (DTP), pneumococcal conjugate (PCV), and measles–rubella (MR) vaccines, adjusting for demographic and socioeconomic variables. Results: Between 2010 and 2022, women’s empowerment in Cambodia improved across literacy, employment, and decision-making. The proportion of women with no schooling declined to 12%, and nearly half completed primary education. Digital access expanded rapidly, with 82.4% owning a mobile phone and about half using the internet daily. Although the share of non-working women slightly increased, agricultural employment fell by one-fifth, and cash earnings rose from 48.7% to 82.5%. Most women, independently or jointly, made decisions about major household matters. Completion rates for OPV, DTP, and PCV ranged from 79% to 83%, while just over half of children were fully vaccinated against measles. Higher maternal education and cash earnings were positively associated with OPV, DTP, and PCV completion but negatively associated with measles vaccination. Joint decision-making on respondents’ income use increased measles non-completion (OR = 2.26, 95% CI: 1.13–4.51), whereas joint decision-making on respondents’ health care was linked to higher completion (OR = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.21–0.83). Conclusions: Women's empowerment remains a key determinant of vaccination outcomes in Cambodia. The distinct pattern of measles underscores structural and behavioral barriers that require integrated approaches to enhance both women's autonomy and service accessibility.

Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Women’s empowerment is a multidimensional and dynamic concept, commonly defined as the process of enhancing women’s ability to make strategic life choices and exercise control over their own lives [1,2]. In practice, empowerment encompasses women’s access to enabling resources, autonomy in decision-making, and the ability to achieve desired outcomes across various life domains [3]. Beyond its inherent significance as a fundamental human right, women’s empowerment is increasingly recognized as a development priority. It has been established as a standalone goal under the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls) and is widely recognized as essential for fostering sustainable development and enhancing societal well-being [4].
Over the past two to three decades, low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) have made notable progress in advancing women's empowerment, particularly by expanding access to education, increasing female labor force participation, and improving access to health services [5]. Women's empowerment, in turn, has a profound impact on both family and child health outcomes. Numerous empirical studies have shown that, in LMICs, women with higher levels of empowerment are more likely to actively seek and use child health services, such as ensuring their children receive timely immunizations, complete the full vaccination schedule, and reduce the risk of preventable diseases [6]. Despite these advancements, the process of achieving full empowerment remains hindered by deeply entrenched social norms, restrictive gender roles, and structural inequalities. These enduring challenges continue to limit the complete realization of women's empowerment.
Cambodia transitioned from a low-income country to a lower-middle-income country in 2015, with a reported GDP per capita of USD 2,754.5 in 2024 [7]. In the same year, Cambodia’s total population was approximately 17.6 million [8], of which about 4.8 million were women aged 15–49 [9]. The sex ratio was roughly 49:51, indicating slightly fewer men than women [10]. Over the past decade, although gender inequality has narrowed, the United Nations Development Program’s Gender Inequality Index (GII) still reported a score of 0.461 for Cambodia, ranking around 116th among more than 160 countries worldwide, indicating persistent gender disparities [11]. In terms of educational attainment, Cambodian women have made significant progress, as evidenced by an increase in the adult female literacy rate from approximately 75% in 2015 to 79.7% in 2022, although it remains below the male rate of 88% [12]. Given employment opportunities, women’s labor force participation has remained at around 75%, close to that of men, but they are predominantly concentrated in low-wage, informal sectors, with average earnings only about 80% of men’s [13].
In Cambodia, the under-five mortality rate declined markedly from about 124 per 1,000 live births in 2000 to 16 per 1,000 in 2021–22 [14], a reduction related mainly to the expansion of the National Immunization Program (NIP, formerly the Expanded Program on Immunization, EPI) [15]. Since its inception in 1974, Cambodia's national immunization program, initiated by the World Health Organization (WHO), has targeted six basic vaccines: diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, measles, poliomyelitis, and tuberculosis. Over time, the program has expanded to include 13 vaccines recommended by WHO, such as hepatitis B (HepB) and the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV), to address broader child health needs [16]. This expansion has been successfully facilitated by Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, which has provided critical support since 2002 through vaccine procurement and health system strengthening [17]. As a result, Cambodia has made significant progress in achieving high vaccination coverage: according to WHO/UNICEF 2023 estimates, completion of the third dose of the diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccine (DTP3) reached 85%, while Bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG) coverage was approximately 91% [18]. Overall, the combined efforts to expand vaccine coverage and strengthen health systems reflect substantial progress in safeguarding child health in Cambodia.
Few studies have examined the impact of women's empowerment on child health in Cambodia. This study examines trends in key women's empowerment dimensions from 2010 to 2021-22, including literacy and information retrieval, employment, and participation in household decision-making, and assesses how these factors are associated with children’s completion of core vaccinations. By analyzing these empowerment domains, the study provides empirical evidence on the extent to which women’s autonomy and access to resources shape the uptake of essential preventive health services, thereby contributing to improved child health outcomes.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Data Sources and Study Population

This study analyzed data from the Cambodia Demographic and Health Surveys (CDHS) conducted in 2010, 2014, and 2021–22. These surveys were jointly implemented by the Cambodian National Institute of Statistics (NIS) and the Ministry of Health (MoH). The CDHS employed a two-stage stratified sampling design. In the first stage, sample points were selected from census tracts defined in the General Population Census [19], followed by random selection of households within each cluster. This approach ensured national and regional representativeness. All women aged 15 to 49 years, whether permanent residents or temporary visitors who had stayed in the sampled households the night before the survey, were eligible for interview. Detailed information on the survey methodology is available in the respective CDHS technical documentation.
For this study, the analytic sample included women who had a live birth within the two years preceding each survey. In cases where a respondent reported multiple births during this period, only the youngest child was included in the analysis to avoid overrepresentation of women with higher fertility.

2.2. Measure of Women’s Empowerment

Women's empowerment was measured using CDHS questionnaire items in three domains: (1) Literacy and information retrieval, (2) Employment, and (3) Decision-making. These domains and their indicators were selected according to DHS conventions for gender-related variables. Specifically:

2.2.1. Literacy and Information Retrieval

This dimension was assessed using indicators of formal education, reading ability, media exposure, and digital access. Educational attainment was categorized as no education, incomplete primary, primary, secondary, or higher, based on questions about school attendance and the highest level completed. Reading ability was measured by asking respondents to read a sentence, with responses classified as cannot read, able to read parts of a sentence, or able to read the whole sentence. Media exposure was measured by the frequency of reading newspapers or magazines, listening to the radio, and watching television, each categorized as not at all, less than once a week, or at least once a week. Digital access included the frequency of internet use in the past month (not at all, less than once a week, at least once a week, or almost every day), mobile phone ownership (yes/no), and mobile phone use for financial transactions in the past year (yes/no).

2.2.2. Employment

This dimension was assessed using indicators of employment group and type of earnings. Employment was assessed using two questions: whether respondents had worked in the past 12 months and their main type of occupation. Based on the responses, the occupation group was categorized as not working, working in agriculture, or working in non-agricultural sectors. Type of earnings for work was measured by asking whether respondents were paid in cash, in kind, both, or not at all.

2.2.3. Decision-Making

This dimension was assessed through indicators of relative earning and autonomy in financial and household decisions. Relative earnings were assessed by asking respondents whether they earned more than, less than, or about the same as their partner, or whether their partner had no income, and were categorized as 'whether the respondent earns more than her partner'. Autonomy over income use was measured by asking who usually decides how the respondent's earnings are used, categorized as independently, jointly, or not involved, and labeled as "decision-making over use of respondent's income". Similarly, three household-level decisions—'decision-making on own health care,' 'decision-making on household purchases,' and 'decision-making on visiting family' were assessed and recoded into independently, jointly, or not involved, and labeled accordingly.

2.3. Immunization Schedule of Childhood Vaccines and Coverage Measures

The outcome measure of this study was vaccination coverage on schedule among children aged 0 to 2 years, focusing on four key antigens: oral polio vaccine (OPV), DTP, PCV, and measles–rubella (MR). OPV, DTP, and PCV are administered in three doses at 6, 10, and 14 weeks of age, while MR is given in two doses at 9 and 18 months [19]. The multi-dose nature of these vaccines provides a more meaningful measure of women's empowerment, as completion of multi-dose schedules may reflect a greater degree of sustained maternal decision-making or engagement with health services. For each antigen, children were categorized into “complete”, “incomplete”, and “no vaccination” based on the number of doses received.

2.4. Demographic and Socioeconomic Factors

Demographic and socioeconomic variables included maternal age (≤19, 20–29, and 30+), residence (urban or rural), wealth (poorest, poorer, middle, richer, and richest), and parity (1, 2, 3+). The CDHS wealth index was constructed using principal component analysis based on household assets, construction materials, and access to water and sanitation facilities, to represent each household's relative standard of living.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Descriptive analyses were employed to assess trends in women's empowerment and key socioeconomic characteristics across survey years, and to examine the relationship between women's empowerment and childhood vaccination coverage using the 2021–22 survey data. Multinomial logistic regression models were constructed to evaluate associations between women's empowerment and child immunization outcomes after adjusting for maternal demographic and socioeconomic characteristics. Traditional media variables, such as radio and television, were excluded from regression models because they had declined significantly by 2021. All analyses were conducted using R version 4.3.3 [20].

3. Results

3.1. Participants

This study included 3,097 women in 2010, 2,841 women in 2014, and 3,284 women in 2021–22 who had given birth within the preceding 2 years (Table 1).
Between 2010 and 2021–22, the sociodemographic profile of women changed significantly. The proportion of women aged 30 years or older increased steadily from 28.0% in 2010 to 38.9% in 2021-22. The urban-rural difference has narrowed, with urban women comprising about one-third by 2021–22. In 2021–22, disadvantaged groups formed a larger share, with 28.8% of women in the poorest quintile and 19.6% in the poorer quintile. The share of women with one or three and more children declined, while those with two children rose from 27.0% in 2010 to 36.2% in 2021–22, becoming the largest group.
Table 2 presents changes in women’s empowerment between 2010 and 2021-22 across three domains: literacy and information retrieval, employment, and decision-making.
Educational attainment improved steadily, with nearly half of women having completed primary education, while the proportion with no schooling declined to 12.0% in 2021-2022. Reading ability also advanced, as only 1 in 5 women was unable to read a sentence by then. Media exposure, however, showed differential trends. Traditional media use declined markedly: the majority of women neither read newspapers or magazines nor listened to the radio, and two-thirds did not watch television. In contrast, digital access expanded rapidly. By 2021–22, 82.4% of women owned a mobile phone, about half used the internet almost daily, and 21.0% reported engaging in mobile financial transactions.
Occupational patterns shifted considerably between 2010 and 2021–22. The share of women employed in agriculture declined from 44.5% to 18.1%, while those engaged in non-agricultural work rose from about one-third to nearly half. Regarding the type of earnings, cash compensation increased markedly from 48.7% in 2010 to 82.5% in 2021–22, whereas in-kind compensation declined significantly from 23.0% to 3.2%.
Regarding earnings relative to their partners, 48.2% of women in 2021-22 reported earning less, while about one-third contributed a similar amount. Regarding decision-making, 64.3% of women could independently decide how to use their income, although one-third also engaged in joint decision-making in the same survey year. For household-related decisions, joint decision-making predominated: more than half of women made health care decisions with their partners, and the majority shared major purchase and family visit decisions with their partners.

3.2. Child Vaccination Coverage by Maternal Sociodemographic Factors, 2021-22

Regarding the focal vaccines in 2021–22, childhood immunization coverage was generally high, with completion rates of 79–83% for OPV, DTP, and PCV, and about 53% for measles.
Tables 3a and 3b present childhood immunization completion rates by maternal sociodemographic characteristics (2021–2022). Regarding maternal age, children of women younger than 19 had substantially lower completion rates than those of older women. Regarding urban-rural differences, rural children were more likely to have incomplete or no vaccination than urban children, with a difference of about 5% across vaccines. By wealth index, children from poorer households consistently had the lowest completion rates for all four vaccines, compared with those from richer and richest households. Regarding parity, children of women with three or more children were more likely to have incomplete vaccination, whereas those of mothers with one or two children had relatively higher completion rates.
Table 3. a: Association between maternal sociodemographic characteristics and childhood vaccination (OPV and DTP), Cambodia, 2021–22.
Table 3. a: Association between maternal sociodemographic characteristics and childhood vaccination (OPV and DTP), Cambodia, 2021–22.
Characteristics OPV (N=2786)
n (%)
DTP (N=2786)
n (%)
No vaccination Incomplete Complete No vaccination Incomplete Complete
Age
19 and less 28 (12.33%) 33 (14.54%) 166 (73.13%) 37 (16.3%) 32 (14.1%) 158 (69.6%)
20-29 99 (6.68%) 165 (11.13%) 1219 (82.2%) 157 (10.59%) 165 (11.13%) 1161 (78.29%)
30+ 83 (7.71%) 117 (10.87%) 876 (81.41%) 116 (10.78%) 111 (10.32%) 849 (78.9%)
P Value 0.02 0.1 0.01 0.02 0.04 0.03
Residence
Urban 58 (6.36%) 85 (9.32%) 769 (84.32%) 84 (9.2%) 84 (9.2%) 744 (81.6%)
Rural 149 (8.02%) 227 (12.22%) 1481 (79.75%) 224 (12.1%) 220 (11.8%) 1413 (76.1%)
P Value 0.1 0.03 0.004 0.03 0.04 0.001
Wealth
Poorest 102 (12.72%) 118 (14.71%) 582 (72.57%) 145 (18.08%) 109 (13.59%) 548 (68.33%)
Poorer 25 (4.72%) 63 (11.89%) 442 (83.40%) 45 (8.49%) 64 (12.08%) 421 (79.43%)
Middle 32 (6.13%) 62 (11.88%) 428 (81.99%) 41 (7.85%) 65 (12.45%) 416 (79.69%)
Richer 29 (5.19%) 40 (7.16%) 490 (87.66%) 42 (7.51%) 41 (7.33%) 476 (85.15%)
Richest 22 (5.9%) 32 (8.58%) 319 (85.52%) 37 (9.92%) 29 (7.77%) 307 (82.31%)
P Value <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Parity
1 62 (6.7%) 96 (10.37%) 768 (82.94%) 103 (11.12%) 92 (9.94%) 731 (78.94%)
2 65 (6.48%) 104 (10.37%) 834 (83.15%) 102 (10.17%) 101 (10.07%) 800 (79.76%)
3+ 83 (9.68%) 115 (13.42%) 659 (76.9%) 105 (12.25%) 115 (13.42%) 637 (74.33%)
P Value 0.02 0.06 <0.001 0.4 0.03 0.01
Table 3. b: Association between maternal sociodemographic characteristics and childhood vaccination (PCV and Measles), Cambodia, 2021–22.
Table 3. b: Association between maternal sociodemographic characteristics and childhood vaccination (PCV and Measles), Cambodia, 2021–22.
Characteristics PCV (N=2786)
n (%)
Measles (N=784)
n (%)
No vaccination Incomplete Complete No vaccination Incomplete Complete
Age
19 and less 36 (15.86%) 32 (14.1%) 159 (70.04%) 11 (20.75%) 10 (18.87%) 32 (60.38%)
20-29 149 (10.05%) 156 (10.52%) 1178 (79.43%) 72 (17.73%) 117 (28.82%) 217 (53.45%)
30+ 112 (10.41%) 126 (11.71%) 838 (77.88%) 61 (18.77%) 84 (25.85%) 180 (55.38%)
P Value 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.2 0.4 0.6
Residence
Urban 81 (8.9%) 85 (9.3%) 746 (81.8%) 44 (15.9%) 73 (26.4%) 159 (57.6%)
Rural 213 (11.5%) 224 (12.1%) 1420 (76.5%) 100 (19.7%) 138 (27.2%) 270 (53.1%)
P Value 0.04 0.04 0.002 0.2 0.9 0.3
Wealth
Poorest 125 (15.59%) 116 (14.46%) 561 (69.95%) 58 (24.89%) 67 (28.76%) 108 (46.35%)
Poorer 44 (8.3%) 62 (11.7%) 424 (80%) 19 (13.19%) 42 (29.17%) 83 (57.64%)
Middle 53 (10.15%) 69 (13.22%) 400 (76.63%) 27 (19.71%) 39 (28.47%) 71 (51.82%)
Richer 47 (8.41%) 36 (6.44%) 476 (85.15%) 25 (16.67%) 40 (26.67%) 85 (56.67%)
Richest 28 (7.51%) 31 (8.31%) 314 (84.18%) 15 (12.5%) 23 (19.17%) 82 (68.33%)
P Value <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.01 0.3 0.002
Parity
1 98 (10.58%) 96 (10.37%) 732 (79.05%) 42 (16.34%) 62 (24.12%) 153 (59.53%)
2 90 (8.97%) 107 (10.67%) 806 (80.36%) 40 (14.55%) 80 (29.09%) 155 (56.36%)
3+ 109 (12.72%) 111 (12.95%) 637 (74.33%) 62 (24.6%) 69 (27.38%) 121 (48.02%)
P Value 0.03 0.2 0.004 0.007 0.4 0.03

3.3. Child Vaccination Coverage by Women Empowerment, 2021-22

Tables 4a and 4b present childhood immunization completion rates according to domains of women's empowerment for 2021–22.
Children whose mothers had no formal education were far less likely to complete vaccinations than those whose mothers had at least secondary education. Among these children, only about two-thirds completed multi-dose vaccines (OPV, DTP, PCV), and barely one-third received measles vaccination. Similarly, while the majority of children of women who could read a full sentence were fully vaccinated, about one-third of children of women who could not read at all were not fully vaccinated. Regarding traditional media use, children of women who did not listen to the radio or watch television had lower vaccination completion rates compared with those whose mothers did. In addition, digital access also revealed substantial disparities: compared to children of mothers who owned a mobile phone, those of non-owners demonstrated lower vaccination completion rates: 71% for OPV, 67% for DTP, and 69% for PCV, versus 46% for measles. Children of women who never accessed the internet and those who did not use mobile phones for financial transactions also had lower vaccination completion rates than children of women who accessed the internet almost daily or had experience with mobile financial transactions.
Compared with women employed in non-agricultural sectors, children of women engaged in agriculture or not employed had lower vaccination completion rates. In terms of type of earnings, compared with other groups, children of women who were only paid in kind had the lowest completion rates: 69% for OPV, 57% for DTP, and 65% for PCV, and only about 31% for measles.
Higher completion rates for OPV, DTP, and PCV (approximately 80%) were observed among children whose mothers participated in household decision-making, compared with those whose mothers did not (approximately 70%). For measles, however, differences across decision-making groups were less pronounced, with completion remaining relatively low in all groups.
Table 4. a: Empowerment characteristics of women associated with childhood immunization among children aged 14 weeks to 2 years (Polio and DTP), Cambodia, 2021-22.
Table 4. a: Empowerment characteristics of women associated with childhood immunization among children aged 14 weeks to 2 years (Polio and DTP), Cambodia, 2021-22.
Characteristics Polio (N=2786)
n (%)
DTP (N=2786)
n (%)
No vaccination Incomplete Complete No vaccination Incomplete Complete
Literacy and information retrieval
Education
No education 57 (16.47%) 56 (16.18%) 233 (67.34%) 76 (21.97%) 54 (15.61%) 216 (62.43%)
Incomplete primary 61 (7.39%) 121 (14.67%) 643 (77.94%) 97 (11.76%) 108 (13.09%) 620 (75.15%)
Primary 69 (5.55%) 123 (9.89%) 1052 (84.57%) 102 (8.2%) 130 (10.45%) 1012 (81.35%)
Secondary and higher 23 (6.2%) 15 (4.04%) 333 (89.76%) 35 (9.43%) 16 (4.31%) 320 (86.25%)
P Value <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Reading ability
Cannot read at all 77 (13.6%) 97 (17.14%) 392 (69.26%) 107 (18.9%) 92 (16.25%) 367 (64.84%)
Able to read only parts of a sentence 49 (5.74%) 103 (12.06%) 702 (82.2%) 82 (9.6%) 91 (10.66%) 681 (79.74%)
Able to read a whole sentence 83 (6.09%) 113 (8.29%) 1167 (85.62%) 120 (8.8%) 124 (9.1%) 1119 (82.1%)
Other 1 (33.33%) 2 (66.67%) 0 (0.00%) 1 (33.33%) 1 (33.33%) 1 (33.33%)
P Value <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Frequency of reading newspapers or magazines
Not at all 181 (7.6%) 282 (11.83%) 1920 (80.57%) 266 (11.16%) 273 (11.46%) 1844 (77.38%)
Less than once a week 10 (5.85%) 14 (8.19%) 147 (85.96%) 11 (6.43%) 15 (8.77%) 145 (84.8%)
At least once a week 19 (8.19%) 19 (8.19%) 194 (83.62%) 33 (14.22%) 20 (8.62%) 179 (77.16%)
P Value 0.7 0.1 0.1 0.05 0.3 0.08
Frequency of listening to the radio
Not at all 187 (7.55%) 281 (11.35%) 2008 (81.1%) 274 (11.07%) 276 (11.15%) 1926 (77.79%)
Less than once a week 10 (6.13%) 25 (15.34%) 128 (78.53%) 15 (9.2%) 22 (13.5%) 126 (77.3%)
At least once a week 13 (8.84%) 9 (6.12%) 125 (85.03%) 21 (14.29%) 10 (6.8%) 116 (78.91%)
P Value 0.7 0.1 0.1 0.05 0.3 0.08
Frequency of watching television
Not at all 157 (8.47%) 222 (11.98%) 1474 (79.55%) 231 (12.47%) 220 (11.87%) 1402 (75.66%)
Less than once a week 23 (6.42%) 37 (10.34%) 298 (83.24%) 27 (7.54%) 40 (11.17%) 291 (81.28%)
At least once a week 30 (5.22%) 56 (9.74%) 489 (85.04%) 52 (9.04%) 48 (8.35%) 475 (82.61%)
P Value 0.02 0.3 0.007 0.005 0.06 <0.001
Frequency of using the internet
Not at all 108 (10.16%) 145 (13.64%) 810 (76.20%) 150 (14.11%) 138 (12.98%) 775 (72.91%)
Less than once a week 4 (6.15%) 10 (15.38%) 51 (78.46%) 6 (9.23%) 9 (13.85%) 50 (76.92%)
At least once a week 17 (7.20%) 25 (10.59%) 194 (82.20%) 20 (8.47%) 29 (12.29%) 187 (79.24%)
Almost every day 81 (5.70%) 135 (9.49%) 1206 (84.81%) 134 (9.42%) 132 (9.28%) 1156 (81.29%)
P Value <0.001 0.009 <0.001 0.001 0.02 <0.001
Whether one owns a mobile telephone
No 70 (13.86%) 76 (15.05%) 359 (71.09%) 94 (18.61%) 71 (14.06%) 340 (67.33%)
Yes 140 (6.14%) 239 (10.48%) 1902 (83.38%) 216 (9.47%) 237 (10.39%) 1828 (80.14%)
P Value <0.001 0.004 <0.001 <0.001 0.02 <0.001
Used a mobile phone for financial transactions (last 12 months)
No 169 (7.71%) 268 (12.22%) 1756 (80.07%) 251 (11.45%) 259 (11.81%) 1683 (76.74%)
Yes 41 (6.91%) 47 (7.93%) 505 (85.16%) 59 (9.95%) 49 (8.26%) 485 (81.79%)
P Value 0.6 0.004 0.006 0.3 0.02 0.01
Employment
Occupation groups
Did not work 74 (8.32%) 106 (11.92%) 709 (79.75%) 98 (11.02%) 111 (12.49%) 680 (76.49%)
Agriculture 49 (9.66%) 69 (13.61%) 389 (76.73%) 73 (14.40%) 64 (12.62%) 370 (72.98%)
Non-agriculture 82 (6.17%) 131 (9.86%) 1116 (83.97%) 129 (9.71%) 126 (9.48%) 1074 (80.81%)
P Value 0.02 0.05 <0.001 0.02 0.04 <0.001
Type of earnings for work
Not paid 15 (11.45%) 13 (9.92%) 103 (78.63%) 20 (15.27%) 11 (8.40%) 100 (76.34%)
Cash only 93 (5.97%) 167 (10.71%) 1299 (83.32%) 143 (9.17%) 159 (10.20%) 1257 (80.63%)
Cash and in-kind 15 (10.64%) 22 (15.60%) 104 (73.76%) 29 (20.57%) 19 (13.48%) 93 (65.96%)
In-kind only 13 (19.70%) 7 (10.61%) 46 (69.70%) 20 (30.30%) 8 (12.12%) 38 (57.58%)
P Value <0.001 0.3 0.001 <0.001 0.5 <0.001
Decision Making
Whether the respondent earns more than her partner
More than him 12 (5.00%) 22 (9.17%) 206 (85.83%) 20 (8.33%) 21 (8.75%) 199 (82.92%)
Less than him 44 (5.72%) 82 (10.66%) 643 (83.62%) 67 (8.71%) 78 (10.14%) 624 (81.14%)
About the same 44 (7.39%) 74 (12.44%) 477 (80.17%) 73 (12.27%) 68 (11.43%) 454 (76.30%)
Husband/partner doesn't bring in money 0 (0.00%) 1 (16.67%) 5 (83.33%) 0 (0.00%) 1 (16.67%) 5 (83.33%)
P Value 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.6 0.08
Decision-making over the use of the respondent's income
Independently 60 (5.81%) 115 (11.14%) 857 (83.04%) 91 (8.82%) 114 (11.05%) 827 (80.14%)
Jointly 33 (6.47%) 57 (11.18%) 420 (82.35%) 48 (9.41%) 49 (9.61%) 413 (80.98%)
Not involved 7 (10.00%) 8 (11.43%) 55 (78.57%) 21 (30.00%) 6 (8.57%) 43 (61.43%)
P Value 0.4 1 0.6 <0.001 0.6 <0.001
Decision-making on own health care
Independently 77 (7.54%) 111 (10.87%) 833 (81.59%) 111 (10.87%) 112 (10.97%) 798 (78.16%)
Jointly 98 (7.10%) 159 (11.51%) 1124 (81.39%) 132 (9.56%) 152 (11.01%) 1097 (79.44%)
Not involve 23 (8.78%) 35 (13.36%) 204 (77.86%) 50 (19.08%) 32 (12.21%) 180 (68.70%)
P Value 0.6 0.5 0.4 <0.001 0.8 <0.001
Decision-making on household purchases
Independently 29 (7.59%) 46 (12.04%) 307 (80.37%) 44 (11.52%) 48 (12.57%) 290 (75.92%)
Jointly 145 (7.11%) 235 (11.53%) 1658 (81.35%) 202 (9.91%) 225 (11.04%) 1611 (79.05%)
Not involve 24 (9.88%) 24 (9.88%) 195 (80.25%) 47 (19.34%) 23 (9.47%) 173 (71.19%)
P Value 0.3 0.7 0.8 <0.001 0.5 0.01
Decision-making on visiting families
Independently 48 (9.96%) 47 (9.75%) 387 (80.29%) 72 (14.94%) 47 (9.75%) 363 (75.31%)
Jointly 133 (6.73%) 234 (11.84%) 1610 (81.44%) 177 (8.95%) 227 (11.48%) 1573 (79.56%)
Not involve 17 (8.29%) 23 (11.22%) 165 (80.49%) 44 (21.46%) 21 (10.24%) 140 (68.29%)
P Value 0.05 0.4 0.8 <0.001 0.5 <0.001
Table 4. b: Empowerment characteristics of women associated with childhood immunization among children aged 14 weeks to 2 years (PCV) and 18 months to 2 years (Measles), Cambodia, 2021-22.
Table 4. b: Empowerment characteristics of women associated with childhood immunization among children aged 14 weeks to 2 years (PCV) and 18 months to 2 years (Measles), Cambodia, 2021-22.
Characteristics PCV (N=2786)
n (%)
Measles (N=784)
n (%)
No vaccination Incomplete Complete No vaccination Incomplete Complete
Literacy and information retrieval
Education
No education 65 (18.79%) 59 (17.05%) 222 (64.16%) 36 (34.95%) 31 (30.1%) 36 (34.95%)
Incomplete primary 92 (11.15%) 119 (14.42%) 614 (74.42%) 39 (17.41%) 67 (29.91%) 118 (52.68%)
Primary 110 (8.84%) 121 (9.73%) 1013 (81.43%) 57 (16.47%) 91 (26.3%) 198 (57.23%)
Secondary and higher 30 (8.09%) 15 (4.04%) 326 (87.87%) 12 (10.81%) 22 (19.82%) 77 (69.37%)
P Value <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.2 <0.001
Reading ability
Cannot read at all 93 (16.43%) 99 (17.49%) 374 (66.08%) 49 (29.52%) 46 (27.71%) 71 (42.77%)
Able to read only parts of a sentence 84 (9.84%) 95 (11.12%) 675 (79.04%) 33 (14.86%) 72 (32.43%) 117 (52.7%)
Able to read a whole sentence 120 (8.8%) 118 (8.66%) 1125 (82.54%) 62 (15.7%) 92 (23.29%) 241 (61.01%)
Other 0 (0.00%) 2 (66.67%) 1 (33.33%) 0 (0.00%) 1 (100.00%) 0 (0.00%)
P Value <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.03 <0.001
Frequency of reading newspapers or magazines
Not at all 257 (10.78%) 280 (11.75%) 1846 (77.47%) 120 (18.07%) 182 (27.41%) 362 (54.52%)
Less than once a week 11 (6.43%) 16 (9.36%) 144 (84.21%) 9 (15.52%) 14 (24.14%) 35 (60.34%)
At least once a week 29 (12.5%) 18 (7.76%) 185 (79.74%) 15 (24.19%) 15 (24.19%) 32 (51.61%)
P Value 0.5 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.8 0.6
Frequency of listening to the radio
Not at all 262 (10.58%) 282 (11.39%) 1932 (78.03%) 125 (17.83%) 190 (27.1%) 386 (55.06%)
Less than once a week 14 (8.59%) 25 (15.34%) 124 (76.07%) 9 (21.43%) 12 (28.57%) 21 (50%)
At least once a week 21 (14.29%) 7 (4.76%) 119 (80.95%) 10 (24.39%) 9 (21.95%) 22 (53.66%)
P Value 0.5 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.8 0.6
Frequency of watching television
Not at all 219 (11.82%) 220 (11.87%) 1414 (76.31%) 100 (19.27%) 151 (29.09%) 268 (51.64%)
Less than once a week 28 (7.82%) 47 (13.13%) 283 (79.05%) 21 (20.59%) 27 (26.47%) 54 (52.94%)
At least once a week 50 (8.7%) 47 (8.17%) 478 (83.13%) 23 (14.11%) 33 (20.25%) 107 (65.64%)
P Value 0.02 0.02 0.002 0.3 0.08 0.007
Frequency of using the internet
Not at all 138 (12.98%) 141 (13.26%) 784 (73.75%) 63 (21.14%) 73 (24.50%) 162 (54.36%)
Less than once a week 5 (7.69%) 10 (15.38%) 50 (76.92%) 4 (16.00%) 8 (32.00%) 13 (52.00%)
At least once a week 23 (9.75%) 33 (13.98%) 180 (76.27%) 12 (18.46%) 21 (32.31%) 32 (49.23%)
Almost every day 131 (9.21%) 130 (9.14%) 1161 (81.65%) 65 (16.41%) 109 (27.53%) 222 (56.06%)
P Value 0.004 0.02 <0.001 0.5 0.5 0.8
Whether one owns a mobile telephone
No 81 (16.04%) 75 (14.85%) 349 (69.11%) 38 (27.94%) 35 (25.74%) 63 (46.32%)
Yes 216 (9.47%) 239 (10.48%) 1826 (80.05%) 106 (16.36%) 176 (27.16%) 366 (56.48%)
P Value <0.001 0.006 <0.001 0.002 0.8 0.04
Used a mobile phone for financial transactions (last 12 months)
No 241 (10.99%) 261 (11.90%) 1691 (77.11%) 125 (20.36%) 167 (27.20%) 322 (52.44%)
Yes 56 (9.44%) 53 (8.94%) 484 (81.62%) 19 (11.18%) 44 (25.88%) 107 (62.94%)
P Value 0.3 0.05 0.02 0.009 0.8 0.02
Employment
Occupation groups
Did not work 103 (11.59%) 99 (11.14%) 687 (77.28%) 42 (19.72%) 47 (22.07%) 124 (58.22%)
Agriculture 56 (11.05%) 77 (15.19%) 374 (73.77%) 36 (22.93%) 45 (28.66%) 76 (48.41%)
Non-agriculture 130 (9.78%) 130 (9.78%) 1069 (80.44%) 64 (16.08%) 113 (28.39%) 221 (55.53%)
P Value 0.005 0.5 0.006 0.2 0.2 0.2
Type of earnings for work
Not paid 19 (14.50%) 14 (10.69%) 98 (74.81%) 7 (21.21%) 9 (27.27%) 17 (51.52%)
Cash only 141 (9.04%) 172 (11.03%) 1246 (79.92%) 76 (15.97%) 142 (29.83%) 258 (54.20%)
Cash and in-kind 19 (13.48%) 21 (14.89%) 101 (71.63%) 13 (28.26%) 8 (17.39%) 25 (54.35%)
In-kind only 15 (22.73%) 8 (12.12%) 43 (65.15%) 6 (37.50%) 5 (31.25%) 5 (31.25%)
P Value 0.3 0.02 0.01 0.03 0.4 0.3
Decision Making
Whether the respondent earns more than her partner
More than him 26 (10.83%) 20 (8.33%) 194 (80.83%) 10 (14.08%) 23 (32.39%) 38 (53.52%)
Less than him 57 (7.41%) 92 (11.96%) 620 (80.62%) 29 (13.36%) 70 (32.26%) 118 (54.38%)
About the same 62 (10.42%) 73 (12.27%) 460 (77.31%) 42 (21.32%) 46 (23.35%) 109 (55.33%)
Husband/partner doesn't bring in money 1 (16.67%) 0 (0.00%) 5 (83.33%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 1 (100.00%)
P Value 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.8
Decision-making over the use of the respondent's income
Independently 87 (8.43%) 125 (12.11%) 820 (79.46%) 52 (16.20%) 91 (28.35%) 178 (55.45%)
Jointly 50 (9.80%) 50 (9.80%) 410 (80.39%) 25 (16.89%) 47 (31.76%) 76 (51.35%)
Not involved 9 (12.86%) 11 (15.71%) 50 (71.43%) 4 (23.53%) 1 (5.88%) 12 (70.59%)
P Value 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.7 0.08 0.3
Decision-making on own health care
Independently 106 (10.38%) 105 (10.28%) 810 (79.33%) 53 (18.03%) 76 (25.85%) 165 (56.12%)
Jointly 142 (10.28%) 156 (11.30%) 1083 (78.42%) 71 (19.24%) 103 (27.91%) 195 (52.85%)
Not involve 30 (11.45%) 44 (16.79%) 188 (71.76%) 12 (16.44%) 18 (24.66%) 43 (58.90%)
P Value 0.8 0.01 0.03 0.8 0.8 0.5
Decision-making on household purchases
Independently 40 (10.47%) 46 (12.04%) 296 (77.49%) 18 (17.82%) 23 (22.77%) 60 (59.41%)
Jointly 203 (9.96%) 229 (11.24%) 1606 (78.80%) 108 (18.91%) 164 (28.72%) 299 (52.36%)
Not involve 35 (14.40%) 30 (12.35%) 178 (73.25%) 10 (15.62%) 10 (15.62%) 44 (68.75%)
P Value 0.1 0.8 0.1 0.8 0.05 0.03
Decision-making on visiting families
Independently 62 (12.86%) 46 (9.54%) 374 (77.59%) 23 (16.91%) 32 (23.53%) 81 (59.56%)
Jointly 189 (9.56%) 228 (11.53%) 1560 (78.91%) 103 (18.93%) 154 (28.31%) 287 (52.76%)
Not involve 26 (12.68%) 31 (15.12%) 148 (72.20%) 10 (17.86%) 11 (19.64%) 35 (62.50%)
P Value 0.06 0.1 0.08 0.9 0.2 0.2

3.4. Association Between Women Empowerment and Child Vaccination Completion

Table 5 presents the associations between various dimensions of women’s empowerment and children’s vaccination completion, after adjusting for women’s sociodemographic and demographic characteristics. Most empowerment variables did not show consistent significance across vaccine groups, and the direction of associations for measles vaccination differed from those for the other three vaccines (OPV, DTP, and PCV). Although some of these differences were not statistically significant, the trends suggested opposite effects across vaccine types.
In terms of literacy and information retrieval, mothers with incomplete primary education were more likely to have children with incomplete OPV and PCV vaccinations; however, they were less likely to have children with incomplete measles vaccinations (OR 0.29, 95% CI, 0.09–0.94) compared to mothers with higher levels of education.
Regarding employment, mothers who were engaged in work had higher odds of incomplete measles vaccination compared to non-working mothers, with the difference being statistically significant among those involved in agricultural work (OR 2.25, 95% CI, 1.08–4.68). However, this trend was not significant for other vaccines. In addition, for OPV, DTP, and PCV, children of mothers who received cash earnings were more likely to be fully vaccinated, compared with children of unpaid women. However, this association reversed for measles vaccination, in which children of mothers receiving cash payments were more likely to be incompletely vaccinated (OR 2.60, 95% CI 1.27–5.32).
Among household decision-making factors, only measles vaccination showed a significant association. Compared with women who made decisions independently, those who jointly decided on the use of their income were more likely to have incompletely vaccinated children (OR 2.26, 95% CI, 1.13–4.51), whereas those who jointly decided on their own health care were more likely to have fully vaccinated children (OR 0.42, 95% CI, 0.21–0.83). For the other three vaccines, these variables showed directions similar to those of the independently deciding group but did not reach statistical significance. Other factors related to information access, mobile phone use, and household decision-making showed no significant associations.
Table 5. Factors associated with incomplete status vaccination among children in Cambodia, based on multinomial logistic regression analysis (2021-2022).
Table 5. Factors associated with incomplete status vaccination among children in Cambodia, based on multinomial logistic regression analysis (2021-2022).
OPV (N=2786)/ n (%) DTP (N=2786)/ n (%) PCV (N=2786)/ n (%) Measles (N=784)/ n (%)
Adjusted OR (95% CI) p-value Adjusted OR (95% CI) p-value Adjusted OR (95% CI) p-value Adjusted OR (95% CI) p-value
Literacy and information retrieval
Education
Secondary and higher Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
No education 2.06 (0.89, 4.79) 0.1 2.08 (0.94, 4.61) 0.1 2.76 (1.25, 6.08) 0.01 0.19 (0.03, 1.29) 0.09
Incomplete primary 1.94 (1.04, 3.63) 0.04 1.70 (0.95, 3.04) 0.07 2.49 (1.39, 4.46) 0.002 0.29 (0.09, 0.94) 0.04
Primary 1.25 (0.76, 2.06) 0.4 1.15 (0.73, 1.80) 0.6 1.46 (0.92, 2.32) 0.1 0.53 (0.22, 1.29) 0.2
Reading ability
Able to read a whole sentence Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
Cannot read at all 1.12 (0.62, 2.03) 0.7 1.13 (0.64, 2.00) 0.7 0.97 (0.55, 1.69) 0.9 3.09 (0.78, 12.16) 0.1
Able to read only parts of a sentence 0.93 (0.62, 1.40) 0.7 0.90 (0.61, 1.32) 0.6 0.87 (0.60, 1.27) 0.5 1.07 (0.51, 2.23) 0.9
Frequency of reading newspapers or magazines
At least once a week Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
Less than once a week 0.77 (0.37, 1.60) 0.5 0.66 (0.33, 1.33) 0.3 0.71 (0.36, 1.42) 0.3 2.05 (0.57, 7.34) 0.3
Not at all 0.80 (0.49, 1.32) 0.4 0.77 (0.49, 1.21) 0.3 0.80 (0.51, 1.27) 0.3 1.78 (0.74, 4.27) 0.2
Frequency of using the internet
Almost every day Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
At least once a week 1.12 (0.68, 1.85) 0.7 1.04 (0.65, 1.67) 0.9 1.19 (0.75, 1.87) 0.5 1.23 (0.38, 3.95) 0.7
Less than once a week 1.90 (0.88, 4.11) 0.1 1.48 (0.68, 3.21) 0.3 1.80 (0.85, 3.80) 0.1 0.88 (0.16, 4.94) 0.9
Not at all 1.35 (0.94, 1.96) 0.1 1.20 (0.85, 1.71) 0.3 1.37 (0.97, 1.93) 0.07 1.14 (0.56, 2.33) 0.7
Whether one owns a mobile telephone
Yes Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
No 1.27 (0.84, 1.91) 0.3 1.22 (0.82, 1.83) 0.3 1.14 (0.77, 1.69) 0.5 1.03 (0.40, 2.68) 0.9
Used a mobile phone for financial transactions (last 12 months)
Yes Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
No 0.91 (0.63, 1.31) 0.6 0.91 (0.65, 1.28) 0.6 0.89 (0.64, 1.25) 0.5 1.03 (0.53, 2.02) 0.9
Employment
Occupation groups
Did not work Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
Agriculture 0.76 (0.55, 1.06) 0.1 0.80 (0.59, 1.09) 0.16 0.80 (0.59, 1.08) 0.1 2.25 (1.08, 4.68) 0.03
Non-agriculture 0.87 (0.64, 1.19) 0.4 1.06 (0.79, 1.43) 0.7 0.84 (0.63, 1.13) 0.3 1.62 (0.80, 3.29) 0.2
Type of earnings for work
Not paid Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
Cash only 0.69 (0.50, 0.95) 0.0 0.69 (0.51, 0.94) 0.02 0.72 (0.53, 0.98) 0.04 2.60 (1.27, 5.32) 0.01
Cash and in-kind 0.96 (0.66, 1.39) 0.8 1.22 (0.86, 1.74) 0.3 0.93 (0.66, 1.33) 0.7 1.41 (0.61, 3.25) 0.4
In-kind only / / / / / / / /
Decision Making
Whether the respondent earns more than her partner
More than him Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
Less than him 0.90 (0.58, 1.40) 0.7 0.90 (0.60, 1.35) 0.6 0.82 (0.55, 1.22) 0.3 1.55 (0.71, 3.39) 0.3
About the same 1.38 (0.89, 2.16) 0.2 1.51 (0.99, 2.29) 0.05 1.19 (0.79, 1.78) 0.4 1.09 (0.51, 2.36) 0.8
Husband/partner doesn't bring in money 0.96 (0.10, 9.48) 1.0 0.97 (0.10, 9.41) 1.0 0.69 (0.07, 6.70) 0.8 / /
Decision-making over the use of the respondent's income
Independently Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
Jointly 1.09 (0.79, 1.51) 0.6 1.01 (0.74, 1.38) 1.0 0.98 (0.72, 1.33) 0.9 2.26 (1.13, 4.51) 0.02
Not involved 1.02 (0.47, 2.21) 1.0 1.50 (0.76, 2.96) 0.2 0.84 (0.42, 1.69) 0.6 / /
Decision-making on own health care
Independently Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
Jointly 1.01 (0.72, 1.43) 1.0 0.97 (0.70, 1.34) 0.8 1.10 (0.80, 1.52) 0.6 0.42 (0.21, 0.83) 0.01
Not involve 1.33 (0.78, 2.27) 0.3 1.51 (0.92, 2.47) 0.1 1.35 (0.82, 2.21) 0.2 1.24 (0.32, 4.87) 0.8
Decision-making on household purchases
Independently Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
Jointly 0.96 (0.61, 1.50) 0.9 0.97 (0.64, 1.48) 0.9 0.84 (0.56, 1.28) 0.4 0.98 (0.39, 2.45) 1.0
Not involve 1.11 (0.50, 2.42) 0.8 0.93 (0.44, 1.94) 0.8 1.25 (0.61, 2.55) 0.5 0.30 (0.05, 1.70) 0.2
Decision-making on visiting families
Independently Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
Jointly 0.70 (0.47, 1.03) 0.1 0.71 (0.49, 1.03) 0.07 0.78 (0.54, 1.13) 0.2 1.20 (0.53, 2.74) 0.7
Not involve 0.68 (0.31, 1.49) 0.3 1.14 (0.55, 2.34) 0.7 1.06 (0.52, 2.16) 0.9 1.52 (0.26, 8.81) 0.6

4. Discussion

Summary of Key Findings

Between 2010 and 2022, women's empowerment in Cambodia improved markedly across literacy, employment, and decision-making. In 2022, completion of OPV, DTP, and PCV was generally high, whereas measles vaccination lagged, with only about half of children completing the recommended dose. After adjusting for maternal socioeconomic and demographic characteristics, higher maternal education and cash income were associated with higher completion of OPV, DTP, and PCV, but with lower measles coverage, suggesting that the effects of empowerment differed by vaccine type. For measles vaccination, joint decision-making about the use of the respondent's income was associated with higher odds of incomplete vaccination, whereas joint decision-making about the respondent's own health care was associated with improved vaccination completion.

Interpretation of Findings

The rise in women’s empowerment in Cambodia, particularly in education and employment, parallels broader gains seen in many LMICs during the late MDG (2000–2015) and early SDG (2015–2030) periods. Under the MDGs, MDG 2 sought universal primary education and the elimination of gender gaps in schooling, while MDG 3 aimed to promote gender equality and empower women. The SDGs then embedded gender more deeply across sectors, primarily through SDG 4 (quality education) and SDG 5 (gender equality). These global initiatives were translated into national actions in Cambodia, such as the Neary Ratanak strategies, which expanded girls’ school enrollment, vocational training opportunities, and women’s participation in non-agricultural employment [21,22,23]
In Cambodia, the national immunization program expanded over the past two decades leading to high overall childhood immunization coverage. With long-standing financial and technical support from the Vaccine Alliance (Gavi), the national immunization programme has strengthened cold-chain capacity, rural outreach, and health-worker training, ensuring a reliable vaccine supply and delivery of routine childhood vaccines at no direct cost to families [17,24]. In some settings, conditional cash transfers and performance-based incentives for health staff have linked small financial rewards to the completion of maternal and child health services, thereby further encouraging timely uptake. These domestic and external investments have jointly strengthened the capacity of Cambodia's immunization services delivery, as reflected in OPV, DTP, and PCV coverage rates that exceed those of many other LMICs. In 2022, coverage for all three vaccines was approximately 10 percentage points higher than in the Philippines [25].
In this study, we found that women's empowerment, particularly their work status, was positively associated with the completion of early childhood vaccinations, such as DPT, OPV, and PCV, which are typically scheduled around an infant's third month. Conversely, women's work status was negatively associated with completion of measles vaccination, which is generally administered when infants are 9–12 months old. In Cambodia, the Labour Law entitles women to at least 90 days of paid maternity leave, which can extend to 13–14 weeks in specific sectors. This leave period largely coincides with the recommended timeline for completing OPV, DTP, and PCV vaccinations, allowing mothers to remain at home, care for their newborns, and maintain regular engagement with healthcare providers [26]. This alignment between the immunization schedule and maternity leave policies reduces both the time and economic opportunity costs of early vaccination, thereby contributing to higher vaccination completion rates. In contrast, the measles vaccine is scheduled after many mothers have returned to work. For women in informal or agricultural employment, taking time off to visit health facilities is especially challenging, which may partially explain lower measles vaccination completion rates.
Higher maternal education is positively associated with increased coverage of OPV, DTP, and PCV vaccines. This relationship may be explained by greater health literacy, enhanced autonomy, and the financial benefits of paid work, which together support women's economic independence and mobility. However, for measles vaccination, we observed the opposite trend: higher levels of education and income, often linked to women's limited work flexibility, may increase the likelihood that mothers miss or forget the recommended immunization schedule.
The decision-making dimensions were also significantly associated with measles vaccination coverage. Shared decision-making regarding a woman's health care was associated with a greater likelihood of completing measles vaccination, possibly reflecting a household environment that values health and mutual support, thereby facilitating timely immunization. In contrast, joint decision-making about household income was negatively associated with measles vaccination. This may indicate that households prioritize financial stability over preventive care, potentially limiting mothers' time and resources for completing later vaccine doses. These findings suggest that the effects of women's empowerment on immunization are not uniformly positive, vary across domains of empowerment, and are influenced by the broader social and structural context. This complexity is particularly evident for later-scheduled vaccinations such as measles.

Policy and Future Research Implications

This study highlights the critical role of women's empowerment in impacting childhood vaccination completion. Given that measles vaccination accounts for roughly 60% of all children's lives saved through routine immunization [27], prioritizing improvements in measles coverage is of public health importance. To address the negative association between women's work status and measles vaccination, health systems should consider offering vaccination services at times and locations convenient for working mothers, such as evenings or weekends, and strengthen community-based outreach services. Additionally, implementing targeted vaccine campaigns and leveraging digital health strategies, like SMS reminders or mobile apps, can help educate and remind women about vaccination schedules, particularly given the increasing access to the internet and mobile phones among women. Such approaches can improve vaccine coverage by reducing time and access barriers for working mothers. Further studies could examine the local context and assess the effectiveness of interventions implemented to improve measles coverage in Cambodia.

Strengths and Limitations

This study has several key strengths. First, it draws on three rounds of nationally representative DHS surveys that employ standardized sampling and quality-control procedures. Second, in the Cambodian context, empirical studies specifically examining women's empowerment and its association with childhood vaccination remain limited. By analyzing data from three survey waves spanning a 12-year period, this study contributes valuable new evidence to this underexplored area, thereby enriching the existing knowledge base on the relationship between women's empowerment and immunization outcomes in low- and middle-income countries.
Several limitations of this study should be acknowledged. First, maternal self-reported information, particularly regarding children’s vaccination history, may be subject to recall bias. However, in this study, the primary source of data for children’s vaccination status was vaccination cards, with only about 10% of the sample relying solely on maternal recall. This suggests that the potential impact of recall bias is likely to be minimal. Second, the analysis focused exclusively on women’s empowerment and did not include direct data on program-level interventions, such as economic incentive schemes or outreach activities. As a result, this study cannot disentangle the relative contributions of such interventions and women’s empowerment to achieving higher vaccination coverage.

5. Conclusions

In Cambodia, women have made substantial progress in education, economic participation, and household decision-making. Women's empowerment is associated with higher completion rates of early multi-dose vaccines (OPV, DTP, and PCV); however, time and access constraints faced by mothers after returning to work may hinder measles vaccination coverage at 9–12 months. To address this, enhanced community- and village-level outreach, integrated vaccination reminders into routine maternal and child health services, and the use of digital health solutions could improve vaccine access and increase measles vaccination coverage.

Author Contributions

H.S. conceptualized the study, conducted data cleaning and statistical analysis, and prepared the initial manuscript draft. Y.Z. contributed to the study design, analytical methodology, and manuscript revision. Q.L. provided supervision, interpretation of results, methodological guidance, and overall coordination of the research process. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Funding

None.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was conducted using deidentified secondary data from the Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS). Ethical approval for the DHS was obtained by the original data collectors. Further information on the DHS ethical protocols is available at https://www.dhsprogram.com/methodology/Protecting-the-Privacy-of-DHS-Survey-Respondents.cfm.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data used in this study are publicly available from the DHS Program database at https://www.dhsprogram.com/data/Access-Instructions.cfm..

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the contributions of Prof. Yu Wang from Duke Kunshan University for her valuable guidance in selecting and conceptualizing indicators of women's empowerment. The authors also sincerely appreciate Dyna Khuon and Chankannika Thaun from the University of Health Sciences, Cambodia, for their insights and support related to the Cambodian context and data interpretation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lu X, Fu C, Wang Q, He Q, Hee J, Takesue R, et al. Women’s Empowerment and Children’s Complete Vaccination in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: A Cross-Sectional Analysis. Vaccines. 2021 Oct 1;9:1117. [CrossRef]
  2. Kabeer N. Resources, agency, achievements: Reflections on the measurement of women’s empowerment. Development and change. 1999;30(3):435–64. [CrossRef]
  3. Lwamba E, Shisler S, Ridlehoover W, Kupfer M, Tshabalala N, Nduku P, et al. Strengthening women’s empowerment and gender equality in fragile contexts towards peaceful and inclusive societies: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Campbell systematic reviews. 2022;18(1):e1214. [CrossRef]
  4. OECD. Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women and Girls: DAC Guidance for Development Partners. OECD Publishing [Internet]. 2022; Available from: https://doi.org/10.1787/0bddfa8f-en.
  5. Akinwale AA. Gender equity and social progress: empowering women and girls to drive sustainable development in Sub–Saharan Africa. International Journal of Innovation Research and Advanced Studies. 2023;
  6. Thorpe S, VanderEnde K, Peters C, Bardin L, Yount KM. The influence of women’s empowerment on child immunization coverage in low, lower-middle, and upper-middle income countries: A systematic review of the literature. Maternal and Child Health Journal. 2016;20(1):172–86. [CrossRef]
  7. Statista. Gross domestic product (GDP) per capita in Cambodia from 1986 to 2030 (in U.S. dollars) [Internet]. Statista, 2025. Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/438362/gross-domestic-product-gdp-per-capita-in-cambodia/.
  8. Economics T. Cambodia: Population [Internet]. Trading Economics; 2024. Available from: https://tradingeconomics.com/cambodia/population.
  9. PopulationPyramid.net. Cambodia: Population Pyramid 2024 [Internet]. PopulationPyramid.net; 2024. Available from: https://www.populationpyramid.net/cambodia/2024/.
  10. Organization WH. Cambodia Country Data [Internet]. 2023. Available from: https://data.who.int/countries/116.
  11. United Nations Development Programme. Human Development Reports: Gender Inequality Index (GII) – Cambodia [Internet]. 2021. Available from: https://hdr.undp.org/data-center.
  12. CEIC Data. Cambodia Literacy Rate: Adult Female (% of females aged 15 and above) [Internet]. 2022. Available from: https://www.ceicdata.com/en/cambodia/social-education-statistics.
  13. Open Development Cambodia. Women in Development [Internet]. 2021. Available from: https://opendevelopmentcambodia.net/en/topics/women-in-development/.
  14. National Institute of Statistics (NIS), Health DG for, ICF. Cambodia Demographic and Health Survey 2021–22: Key Indicators Report [Internet]. Phnom Penh, Cambodia, and Rockville, Maryland, USA: NIS and ICF; 2023. Available from: https://nis.gov.kh/nis/CDHS/2021-22/Cambodia_DHS2021-2022_Key_Indicator_Report_EN.pdf.
  15. Dan. Cambodia Leads Southeast Asia in Vaccine Rollout [Internet]. 2025. Available from: https://www.vaccinealliance.org/press/press-cambodia/.
  16. World Health Organization. Expanded Programme on Immunization (EPI) [Internet]. World Health Organization; 2024. Available from: https://www.who.int/teams/immunization-vaccines-and-biologicals/essential-programme-on-immunization.
  17. MOPAN. Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance [Internet]. Multilateral Organisation Performance Assessment Network (MOPAN); 2024. Available from: https://www.mopan.org/content/dam/mopan/en/publications/our-work/evidence/gavi/gavi-2024/mopan-gavi-assessment-report-2024.pdf.
  18. World Health Organization, UNICEF. Estimates of National Immunization Coverage (WUENIC) – Cambodia, 2023 [Internet]. WHO/UNICEF; 2024. Available from: https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/country-profiles/immunization/2024-country-profiles/immunization-2024-khm.pdf.
  19. National Institute of Statistics (NIS) [Cambodia, Ministry of Health (MoH) [Cambodia, ICF. Cambodia Demographic and Health Survey 2021–2022: Final Report. Phnom Penh, Cambodia; Rockville, MD, USA: NIS, MoH, and ICF; 2023.
  20. R Project. The R Project for Statistical Computing [Internet]. 2025. Available from: https://www.r-project.org/.
  21. World Bank. Cambodia Country Gender Action Plan FY25–FY29 [Internet]. The World Bank Group; 2024. Available from: https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099092424010529589/pdf/P17813410d80830a0b0b070ceca8b2e612e.pdf.
  22. United Nations. The Millennium Development Goals Report 2015 [Internet]. United Nations; 2015. Available from: https://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/2015_MDG_Report/pdf/MDG%202015%20rev%20(July%201).pdf.
  23. Ven S, Pham L. Gender equality and women’s empowerment in Cambodia: A review of national policies and strategies [Internet]. East Meets West; Water for Women; Australian Aid; 2022. Available from: https://thrivenetworks.org/uploads/files/eng1680778117.pdf.
  24. World Health Organization. Summary of WHO Position Papers: Recommended Routine Immunizations for Children [Internet]. World Health Organization; 2025 Jan. Available from: https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/immunization/tables/table_2_january_2025_web_english.pdf.
  25. World Health Organization, United Nations Children's Fund. Philippines: WHO and UNICEF estimates of immunization coverage: 2022 revision. WHO and UNICEF, 2023, pp. 1–21.
  26. International Labour Organization, Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific. Practical challenges for maternity protection in the Cambodian garment industry [Internet]. Phnom Penh: International Labour Organization; 2012. Available from: https://www.ilo.org/asia/publications/WCMS_203802.
  27. Shattock AJ, Johnson HC, Sim SY, Carter A, Lambach P, Hutubessy RCW, et al. Contribution of vaccination to improved survival and health: modelling 50 years of the Expanded Programme on Immunization. The Lancet. 2024 May;403(10441):2307–16. [CrossRef]
Table 1. Background characteristics of women who have recently given birth to a child up to 2 years of age before the DHS surveys, Cambodia, 2010 – 2022.
Table 1. Background characteristics of women who have recently given birth to a child up to 2 years of age before the DHS surveys, Cambodia, 2010 – 2022.
Characteristics 2010 (N=3097) 2014 (N=2841) 2021–22 (N=3284) P-value
Age
19 and less 262 (8.46%) 268 (9.43%) 264 (8.04%) <0.001
20-29 1969 (63.58%) 1762 (62.02%) 1743 (53.08%)
30+ 866 (27.96%) 811 (28.55%) 1277 (38.89%)
Residence1
Urban 805 (26.33%) 772 (27.56%) 1075 (33.01%) <0.001
Rural 2252 (73.67%) 2029 (72.44%) 2182 (66.99%)
Wealth
Poorest 780 (25.19%) 659 (23.2%) 945 (28.78%) <0.001
Poorer 581 (18.76%) 528 (18.59%) 642 (19.55%)
Middle 520 (16.79%) 441 (15.52%) 605 (18.42%)
Richer 572 (18.47%) 506 (17.81%) 660 (20.1%)
Richest 644 (20.79%) 707 (24.89%) 432 (13.15%)
Parity
1 1104 (35.65%) 1163 (40.94%) 1072 (32.64%) <0.001
2 837 (27.03%) 866 (30.48%) 1190 (36.24%)
3+ 1156 (37.33%) 812 (28.58%) 1022 (31.12%)
1 40 women in 2010, 40 in 2014, and 27 in 2021 had missing values.
Table 2. Empowerment characteristics of women who have recently given birth to a child up to 2 years of age before the DHS surveys, Cambodia, 2010 – 2022.
Table 2. Empowerment characteristics of women who have recently given birth to a child up to 2 years of age before the DHS surveys, Cambodia, 2010 – 2022.
Characteristics 2010 (N=3097) 2014 (N=2841) 2021–22 (N=3284) P-value
Literacy and information retrieval
Education
No education 608 (19.63%) 360 (12.67%) 393 (11.97%) <0.001
Incomplete primary 1343 (43.36%) 1060 (37.31%) 975 (29.69%)
Primary1 988 (31.9%) 1147 (40.37%) 1476 (44.95%)
Secondary and higher2 158 (5.1%) 274 (9.64%) 440 (13.4%)
Reading ability3
Cannot read at all 962 (31.06%) 664 (23.38%) 665 (20.25%) <0.001
Able to read only parts of a sentence 669 (21.6%) 641 (22.57%) 991 (30.18%)
Able to read a whole sentence 1466 (47.34%) 1534 (54.01%) 1624 (49.45%)
Other4 0 (0.00%) 1 (0.04%) 4 (0.12%)
Frequency of reading newspapers or magazines5
Not at all 2107 (68.08%) 2176 (76.59%) 2811 (85.6%) <0.001
Less than once a week 655 (21.16%) 482 (16.97%) 196 (5.97%)
At least once a week 333 (10.76%) 183 (6.44%) 277 (8.43%)
Frequency of listening to the radio6
Not at all 1240 (40.05%) 1369 (48.19%) 2920 (88.92%) <0.001
Less than once a week 906 (29.26%) 745 (26.22%) 186 (5.66%)
At least once a week 950 (30.68%) 727 (25.59%) 178 (5.42%)
Frequency of watching television7
Not at all 838 (27.08%) 889 (31.29%) 2210 (67.3%) <0.001
Less than once a week 695 (22.46%) 438 (15.42%) 418 (12.73%)
At least once a week 1562 (50.47%) 1514 (53.29%) 656 (19.98%)
Frequency of using the internet8
Not at all - - 1243 (37.85%)
Less than once a week - - 78 (2.38%)
At least once a week - - 295 (8.98%)
Almost every day - - 1668 (50.79%)
Whether one owns a mobile telephone
No - - 578 (17.6%)
Yes - - 2706 (82.4%)
Used a mobile phone for financial transactions (last 12 months)
No - - 2593 (78.96%)
Yes - - 691 (21.04%)
Employment
Occupation groups9
Did not work 747 (24.14%) 877 (30.99%) 1062 (33.1%) <0.001
Agriculture10 1376 (44.47%) 889 (31.41%) 581 (18.11%)
Non-agriculture11 971 (31.38%) 1064 (37.6%) 1565 (48.78%)
Type of earnings for work12
Not paid 60 (2.55%) 92 (4.67%) 150 (6.75%) <0.001
Cash only 1144 (48.70%) 1709 (86.84%) 1834 (82.54%)
Cash and in-kind 605 (25.76%) 118 (6.00%) 167 (7.52%)
In-kind only 540 (22.99%) 49 (2.49%) 71 (3.20%)
Decision Making
Whether the respondent earns more than her partner13
More than him 210 (12.49%) 209 (12.00%) 283 (14.89%) 0.03
Less than him 883 (52.5%) 930 (53.42%) 917 (48.24%)
About the same 582 (34.6%) 597 (34.29%) 694 (36.51%)
Husband/partner doesn't bring in money 7 (0.42%) 5 (0.29%) 7 (0.37%)
Decision-making over the use of the respondent's income14
Independently 1070 (63.77%) 1155 (66.27%) 1224 (64.29%) <0.001
Jointly15 591 (35.22%) 550 (31.55%) 604 (31.72%)
Not involved16 17 (1.01%) 38 (2.18%) 76 (3.99%)
Decision-making on own health care17
Independently 1184 (39.66%) 1119 (41%) 1211 (38.46%) 0.4
Jointly18 1530 (51.26%) 1357 (49.73%) 1640 (52.08%)
Not involved 271 (9.08%) 253 (9.27%) 298 (9.46%)
Decision-making on household purchases19
Independently 412 (13.83%) 385 (14.11%) 456 (14.49%) <0.001
Jointly 2395 (80.42%) 2121 (77.75%) 2402 (76.3%)
Not involved 171 (5.74%) 222 (8.14%) 290 (9.21%)
Decision-making on visiting families20
Independently 590 (19.78%) 537 (19.68%) 558 (17.72%) <0.001
Jointly 2233 (74.86%) 2082 (76.29%) 2354 (74.75%)
Not involved 160 (5.36%) 110 (4.03%) 237 (7.53%)
1 Primary includes complete primary and incomplete secondary. 2 Secondary and higher includes complete secondary and higher. 3 1 woman in 2014 had a missing value. 4 Other includes No card with required language and Blind/visually impaired. 5 2 women in 2010 had a missing value. 6 1 woman in 2010 had a missing value. 7 2 women in 2010 had a missing value. 8 2 women in 2010 had a missing value. 9 3 women in 2010, 11 in 2014, and 76 in 2021 had missing values; the answer “do not know" was also treated as a missing value in this analysis. 10 Agriculture includes agricultural self-employed and agricultural employees. 11 Non-agriculture includes professional/technical/managerial, clerical, sales, household and domestic, services, skilled manual, and unskilled manual. 12 Based on respondents who have worked during the last 12 months, 1 woman in 2010 had a missing value. 13 Based on currently married or in union women who were paid cash for their work, 8 women in 2010, 3 in 2014, and 3 in 2021 had missing values; the answer "do not know" was also treated as a missing value in this analysis. 14 Based on currently married or in union women who were paid cash for their work, 11 women in 2010, 1 in 2014, and 1 in 2021 had missing values. 15 Jointly includes the respondent and the husband/partner, and the respondent and another person. 16 Not involved includes husband/partner alone, someone else, and others. 17 112 women in 2010, 112 in 2014, and 135 in 2021 had missing values. 18 Jointly includes the respondent and the husband/partner, and the respondent and another person. 19 119 women in 2010, 113 in 2014, and 136 in 2021 had missing values. 20 114 women in 2010, 112 in 2014, and 135 in 2021 had missing values.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated