Submitted:
26 September 2025
Posted:
26 September 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Data and Methods
2.1. Research Area
2.2. Data Sources
2.3. Methods
- Population shrinkage measurement model
- 2.
- Spatial autocorrelation
3. The Spatiotemporal Pattern of Population Shrinkage
3.1. Overall Characteristics of Population Shrinkage
3.2. Population Shrinkage Characteristics of Various Cities
3.3. Characteristics of Population Change
3.4. Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Population Shrinkage in Counties
- 3.
- Global shrinkage counties
- 4.
- Change of local agglomerative areas
4. Analysis of Factors Influencing Population Shrinkage
4.1. Qualitative Analysis
4.2. Quantitative Analysis
| Dependent variable | Factors type |
Independent variable |
2000 2010 2020 Beta Sig. Beta Sig. Beta Sig. |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Population | Economic factors | GDP | -0.044 | 0.852 | -0.166 | 0.766 | 0.791 | 0.000*** |
| Added value of primary industry | 0.491 | 0.000 *** |
0.400 | 0.015 | 0.403 | 0.000*** | ||
| Added value of secondary industry | -0.236 | 0.125 | 0.330 | 0.169 | 0.231 | 0.000*** | ||
| Added value of tertiary industry | 0.187 | 0.103 | 0.361 | 0.207 | 0.336 | 0.000*** | ||
| General budgets revenues of local finance | 0.018 | 0.879 | -0.201 | 0.114 | -0.458 | 0.016 | ||
| General budgetary expenditures of local finance | 0.061 | 0.695 | 0.269 | 0.000*** | -0.142 | 0.046 | ||
| Balance of savings deposits of urban and rural residents | 0.328 | 0.012 | 0.288 | 0.002 | 0.128 | 0.127 | ||
| Per capita rural disposable income | 0.070 | 0.402 | 0.003 | 0.965 | 0.134 | 0.197 | ||
| Social factors | Employees per 10,000 people | -0.058 | 0.387 | -0.017 | 0.708 | 0.064 | 0.779 | |
| Employment in industrial enterprises of above scale | 0.244 | 0.008 | -0.078 | 0.309 | -0.010 | 0.023 | ||
| Beds per 10,000 medical and health institutions | -0.104 | 0.112 | -0.083 | 0.164 | -0.128 | 0.026 | ||
| Beds per 10,000 social welfare nstitutions | 0.019 | 0.784 | 0.059 | 0.230 | -0.092 | 0.178 | ||
| Location factors | Distance to the nearest administrative region center | 0.175 | 0.027 | -0.071 | 0.171 | -0.291 | 0.699 | |
| Distance to the provincial capital | -0.204 | 0.030 | -0.083 | 0.323 | 0.019 | 0.353 | ||
| Natural factors | Average slope | 0.067 | 0.477 | 0.163 | 0.013 | -0.060 | 0.648 | |
| Average annual temperature | 0.038 | 0.602 | 0.000 | 0.997 | 0.026 | 0.082 | ||
| Average annual precipitation | -0.164 | 0.050 | -0.208 | 0.002 | 0.116 | 0.870 | ||
| Adjusted R2 | 0.905 | 0.940 | 0.955 | |||||
5. Conclusion and Discussion
5.1. Conclusion
- (1)
- From 2000 to 2010, the proportion of population shrinkage of county-level administrative regions in Qiqihar city, Yichun city, and Jixi city was high in Heilongjiang province. From 2010 to 2020, the population of county-level administrative regions in Qitaihe city, Suihua city, and Daxing'anling region shrank more severely than in other cities. From 2000 to 2020, the phenomenon of population shrinkage in Heilongjiang province became increasingly apparent, and the degree of shrinkage became more and more severe. The vast majority of county-level regions were shrinkage in Heilongjiang province.
- (2)
- During the research period, the number of county-level administrative regions with growth turning to shrinkage was the largest, that is to say, county-level administrative regions that did not shrink during the first period turned to shrinkage regions during the second period. These regions mainly concentrate in the central part of Heilongjiang province. The proportion of continuous shrinkage of county-level administrative regions in Heilongjiang province is large and these regions concentrate in the northern and southeastern parts of Heilongjiang province. County-level administrative regions with continuous growth are very few, so are county-level administrative regions with shrinkage turning to growth.
- (3)
- The distribution of shrinkage regions has strong spatial correlation which forms four characteristics: high-high agglomeration, high-low agglomeration, low-high agglomeration, and low-low agglomeration. During the research period, the scope of high-high agglomeration regions in Heilongjiang province reduced, while the scope of low-low agglomeration regions expanded.
- (4)
- The factors that affect population shrinkage in Heilongjiang province are various, but population shrinkage mainly affected by economic factors. The added value of the tertiary industry has a significant impact on the total population. Due to the decrease in economic development level in Heilongjiang province during the research period, population shrinkage has intensified.
5.2. Discuss
References
- Peiyong, Deng; Yihua, Liu. Spatial pattern and influence factors analysis of population shrinkage in county unit in China; Modern City Research, 2018; pp. 31–38. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Renia, Ehrenfeucht. Quietly shrinking cities: Canadian urban population loss in an age of growth, by Maxwell Hartt[J]. Journal of Urban Affairs 2022, 44(7), 1–2. [Google Scholar]
- Gert, J.H. Coping with shrinkage in Europe’s cities and towns. Urban Design International 2012, 18, 78–89. [Google Scholar]
- Lei, Han; Xiaoming, Qi; Jun, Hao. Spatiotemporal pattern of county population shrinkage in eastern Inner Mongolia and driving force analysis. Journal of Arid Resources and Enviromment 2022, 36(8), 60–67. [Google Scholar]
- Qingsong, He; Miao, Yan; Jiayu, Wu. Characteristics of Population Shrinkage in Inner Urban China and Correlations with Urban Growth Patterns. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy 2023, 16, 1317–1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yuchen, Hu; Yanjun, Liu; Hongri, Sun. Process and factors of urban growth and shrinkage: A case study of mining cities in Heilongjiang Province. Scientia Geographica Sinica 2020, 40(9), 1450–1459. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
- Karp, D. N.; Bagchi-Sen, S.; Rogerson, P. Not all shrinking places are similar: The variegated nature of population decline in the United States. Applied Geography 2021, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, H; Mykhnenko, V. Urban shrinkage with Chinese characteristics. The Geographical Journal 2018, 184(4), 398–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, Li; Kevin LO; Pingyu, Zhang. Population Shrinkage in Resource-dependent Cities in China: Processes, Patterns and Drivers. Chinese Geographical Science 2020, 30(1), 1–15. [Google Scholar]
- Xiuxia, Li; Yongjing, Cui; Qi, Chen; et al. The economic effect of population contraction in Northeast China and its countermeasures. Population and the Economy 2023, 2018(1), 71–86. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
- Qianqian, Liu; Xiangli, Wu. The measurement and driving mechanism of the coordinated development of regional economy and basic public services in the three northeast provinces under the background of population shrinkage. Economic Geography 2023, 43(6), 22–32. [Google Scholar]
- Zhen, Liu; Honggan, Qi; Shenghe, Liu. Labor Shrinkage and its Driving Forces in China from 1990 to 2015: A Geographical Analysis. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy 2021, 15, 339–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhen, Liu; Honggang, Qi; Wei, Qi; et al. The evolution of spatial-temporal pattern of population shrinkage region distribution in China from 1990 to 2010: An analysis based on different measures. Geosciences 2019, 39(10), 1525–1536. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
- Zhen, Liu; Wei, QI; Honggang, QI; et al. The evolution of regional population decline and its driving factors at the county level in China from 1990 to 2015. Geographical Research 2020, 39(7), 1565–1579. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
- Zuopeng, Ma; Chenggu, Li; Pingyu, Zhang. Characteristics, mechanism and response of urban shrinkage in the three provinces of Northeast China. Acta Geographica Sinica 2021, 76(4), 767–780. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
- Nefedova, T. G.; Medvedev, A. A. Shrinkage of the Developed Space in Central Russia: Population Dynamics and Land Use in Rural Areas. Rural Studies 2020, 10, 549–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, Qi; Shenghe, Liu; Fengjun, Jin. Calculation and spatial evolution of population loss in Northeast China. Scientia Geographica Sinica 2017, 37(12), 1795–1804. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
- Pingjun, Sun; Kewen, Wang. Identification and stage division of urban shrinkage in them three provinces of Northeast China. Acta Geographica Sinica 2021, 76(6), 1366–1379. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
- Tingting, Wang; Kang, Wu; Cuiyou, Yao; et al. Complex pathways to population shrinkage: case study of Hegang city, China. Chinese Geographical Science 2022, 32(3), 418–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wolff, M.; Wiechmann, T. Urban growth and decline: Europe’s shrinkage cities in a comparative perspective 1990–2010. European Urban and Regional Studies 2018, 25(2), 122–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mingke, Xie; Zhangxian, Feng; Yang, Song; et al. How Does Urban Shrinkage Affect Land Use Efficiency? A Case Study of Shrinking Cities in Northeast China. Chinese Geographical Science 2024, 34(1), 34–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kui, Ying; Jinhong, Ding; Yihao, Chen; et al. Spatial characteristics of population shrinkage and influencing factors detected by MGWR model in Guizhou county. World Regional Studies 2023, 32(12), 172–184. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]




| The type of shrinkage | 2000-2010 | 2010-2020 | Two periods | |||
| Quantity (unit) | Percentage (%) | Quantity (unit) | Percentage (%) | Quantity (unit) | Range (%) | |
| Mild shrinkage | 0 | 0.00 | 8 | 6.61 | +8 | +6.61 |
| Moderate shrinkage | 14 | 11.57 | 0 | 0.00 | -14 | -11.57 |
| Significant shrinkage | 43 | 35.54 | 103 | 85.12 | +60 | +49.58 |
| Total shrinkage type | 57 | 47.11 | 111 | 91.73 | +54 | +44.62 |
| Non-shrinkage | 64 | 52.89 | 10 | 8.27 | -54 | -44.62 |
| The 1st period(2000-2010) | The 2nd period (2010-2020) | Total Change | ||||||||||||
| Mild | Moderate | Significant | Total | % | Mild | Moderate | Significant | Total | % | Quantity | Percent | |||
| Harbin | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 4.13 | 2 | 0 | 13 | 15 | 12.40 | +10 | +8.27 | ||
| Qiqihar | 0 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 8.26 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 15 | 12.40 | +5 | +4.14 | ||
| Jixi | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 5.79 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 | 6.61 | +1 | +0.82 | ||
| Hegang | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 4.96 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 7 | 5.79 | +1 | +0.83 | ||
| Shuangyashan | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 4.13 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 8 | 6.61 | +3 | +2.48 | ||
| Daqing | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.83 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 9 | 7.44 | +8 | +6.61 | ||
| Yichun | 0 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 7.44 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 | 7.44 | +0 | +0.00 | ||
| Jiamusi | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.83 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 9 | 7.44 | +8 | +6.61 | ||
| Qitaihe | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.83 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 3.31 | +3 | +2.48 | ||
| Mudanjiang | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 3.31 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 9 | 7.44 | +5 | +4.13 | ||
| Heihe | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 3.31 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 4.13 | +1 | +0.82 | ||
| Suihua | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1.65 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 | 8.26 | +8 | +6.61 | ||
| Greater Khingan | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1.65 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 2.48 | +1 | +0.83 | ||
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).