Preprint
Communication

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Efficacy of Indigenously Isolated Rice Field Methanotrophs as Potential Bio-Inoculants for Promoting Rice Plant Growth

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

15 September 2025

Posted:

16 September 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract

Based on the results of pot experiments, a small-scale field trial was designed to test the efficacy of two methanotrophs on rice plant growth. A methanotroph, Methylomonas strain Kb3, and Methylomagnum ishizawai strain KRF4 were found to be promising in promoting rice plant growth in our earlier experiments done on an Indian rice cultivar, Indrayani. The same methanotrophs were used in a small-scale field trial, where the individual methanotrophs and in combination were used. Methylomonas strain Kb3 was helpful in enhancing the plant growth height and yield in the field experiment, compared to the control plants. Methylomonas Kb3 and Methylomagnum KRF4 in combination also showed considerable positive effects. Methylomagnum ishizawai KRF4 alone did not show an increase in grain yield. The nitrogen input in this field, as per the farmers' practice, has been considerably low (~50kg N/ha) compared to the normally used fertiliser input (100 or 150 kg N/ha). The treatment with methanotrophs was done by dipping the plants in the inoculum. Methylomonas strain Kb3, an indigenously isolated methanotroph, was reported in 2014 from a field ~25 km away from the region where trials were taken, and the genome analysis was done in our prior studies, indicating that it has a complete nitrogen fixation pathway. Kb3 showed an increase in plant height of ~ 15% and an increase in grain yield of ~17% compared to the control plants, with no methanotroph treatment. Methylomonas Kb3 also induced early flowering in the rice plants, followed by early grain formation and early maturation. Methylomonas-Methylomagnum combination treatment showed ~15% height increase and ~15% yield increase compared to the control, whereas Methylomagnum ishizawai KRF4 showed comparable growth yields to the control plants.

Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Approximately 20% of human calories come from rice, one of the three major staple cereals consumed worldwide. Given that the world’s population is expected to surpass 10 billion people during the next 30 years, there will likely be a major increase in demand for paddy farming. Asia produces 90% of the world’s rice, and India is the world’s second-biggest producer behind China, with the largest area under cultivation (about 43.7 million hectares) (Agricultural-statistics-at-a-Glance-2020.pdf). Traditional rice farming practices follow growing the paddy in a waterlogged state, mainly due to the belief that rice is an aquatic crop, but this practice also helps eliminate the growth of weeds and pests. However, the flooding reduces the diffusion of oxygen into water, creating an anoxic environment, where organic soil substrates are reduced by the anaerobic microbes, resulting in methane. Methane is the second most important greenhouse gas after carbon dioxide, with the potency to trap 26 times more heat than CO2, and has a relatively short half-life of ~12 years [1]. Thus, reducing methane generation from these sites can largely aid in controlling the emissions. As per the latest IPCC report [2], about 335-383 Tg methane is produced per year, of which rice fields contribute up to 10% globally, i.e., ~25-37 Tg methane/ year. The latest available data on the current status of methane regulation from India suggests that the rice fields emit ~3.9 Tg of methane per year [3]. And the yearly highest peak in the methane emission is observed between August and September, the season when maximum rice is cultivated in the country [3]. The balance between the opposite processes of methane production and oxidation determines the net amount of methane released into the atmosphere from rice fields. Methanotrophs, or methane-oxidizing bacteria, oxidize methane and are nature’s natural methane mitigation agents [4]. Methanotrophs are majorly alpha and gamma proteobacteria groups of bacteria that dwell in the oxic-anoxic interface of rice fields as well as in rice roots and play a role in the carbon-methane cycle by oxidizing methane to carbon dioxide, thus minimizing the methane emissions from the soil into the atmosphere [5,6,7]. Methane oxidation significantly reduces methane’s ability to diffuse into the atmosphere in rice fields. The presence and methanotrophic oxidizing activity of methanotrophs in rice rhizospheres oxidize up to 20% of the produced methane, thereby reducing the net flux [1]. The widely varied levels of methane and oxygen generated by roots in the rice rhizosphere suggest that the habitat of methanotrophs is highly heterogeneous [5]. Rice roots mainly harbor Type I methanotrophs, though both Type I and Type II methanotrophs are present in the soil and rhizosphere region [5,7,8]. However, methanotrophs only make up a very small portion (~1%) of the total soil flora in nature [17]. Thus, it would be interesting to investigate whether adding more methanotrophs through inoculation or spraying can improve methane mitigation and benefit plant growth. Since higher growth output would be cost-effective for farmers, our team has been conducting experiments to see if methanotrophs can impact rice plant growth. Therefore, the goal of this study was to find an appropriate and simple way to administer methanotrophs to rice plants at the small field level. We have conducted such experiments in pots in recent years and discovered that the natively isolated methanotrophs can stimulate plant growth when administered to rice plants [11]. It would be intriguing to investigate whether more methanotroph supplementation through inoculation or spraying would improve methane mitigation and have beneficial impacts on plant growth, as methanotrophs only make up a very small portion (~1%) of the overall soil flora in nature [17].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Selection of a Rice Field for the Field Experiment

A rice farm in Malegaon village near Lavasa was selected to conduct the experiments after talking to the farmer about the farming practices and getting his permission. The farmer agreed and allowed us to experiment on his rice field. All the experiments were performed in his presence. The field is located at 18.4097° N and 73.5066° E on the Lavasa road in the interiors of the village, Malegaon. This area has been traditionally used for rice farming, and the rice farmer practiced traditional rice farming by transplanting rice and using relatively low nitrogen fertilizer inputs, i.e., with low nitrogen inputs (50 kg N/ha), which were ideal for our experiments. We visited the field initially in May 2024 to get an idea of the area, and then on June 20 2024 (around ~15 days after he had sown the grains), when the plants were in the early nursery stage. The farmer did not use any fertilizer for the rice nursery preparation.
The methanotrophs, Methylomonas Kb3, and Methylomagnum ishizawai KRF4, were grown in replicates in 1L or 2L sealed flasks and fresh cultures (7–10 days old) in modified NMS medium [9], and on the day of transplantation, the inoculum was transported to the field. Approximately 2 L of each fully grown and fresh culture was carried to the field in plastic cans, which consisted of ~1-1.5 OD of the culture. The following methanotrophs were used: Methylomonas strain Kb3 (Type Ia, methanotroph, this methanotroph has been one of the promising candidates for the application) and Methylomagnum ishizawai strain KRF4 (second candidate for the application) were used for the field application, and a combination of the same, termed as mixed MOB (methane-oxidizing bacteria). In case of control plants, the plants were dipped in modified NMS medium, but no bacteria were added. The experiment was continued till the end of the rice season, and the mature grains were harvested. The overall experiment (Figure 1a) shows the different stages of the rice field experiment.

2.2. Treatment of Rice Plantlets with Selected Methanotroph Strains

The field experiment was started at the transplantation stage (July 3 2024). Plots measuring 4m x 3m were marked using wooden sticks (Figure 1b), and a randomized plot design was used. The ~25-day-old nursery plantlets were briefly washed by dipping in a tub of water and then treated with the selected methanotroph cultures by keeping them dipped in the diluted inoculum (1:20), and a mixed consortium was prepared with both strains mixed in the field, before application. Thus, the following four treatments were given: Kb3, KRF4, Kb3+KRF4 (equal proportions), and control (NMS medium) in the ratio of 1:20 (1L of inoculum and 19L of water) for 1 hour, and the treated plants were carefully transplanted to the field (Figure 1b. The plants were transplanted in a pre-marked rectangle of 4m x 3m in rows using a rope with a 25cm distance between each plant hill, resulting in roughly 16 plant hills per square meter and ~192-200 plant hills per treatment. Fertilizers were applied in minimum doses: Urea ~38 kg per acre and an NPK fertilizer Suphala (15:15:15) 25 kg per acre. Thus, the total applied N per ha was ~50 kg N /ha.

2.3. Data Collection, Farm Visits, and Soil Sampling

The field was visited regularly, and the data as well as plant samples were collected at the tillering, flowering-early grain filling, and grain maturation stages on July 31 2024 (tillering stage), September 19 2024 (flowering stage), and October 28 2024 (grain maturation stage and harvest). The flowering stage and early grain formation stage were noted on September 19 2024, and plants were photographed using a mobile camera. At this stage, the plant height and panicle height were recorded, and the number of plants with grain formation and the number of plants with only flowering were noted in six random plants. The treated rice crops were harvested after 4 months of transplantation and assessed for their growth in height, number of panicles, number of tillers, height of the panicle, weight of 1000 grains, and total weight of grains per hill.

2.4. Soil Sampling for Enrichment of Methanotrophs

Rhizosphere soil from the field was sampled at the tillering stage by uprooting three random plants from the treated and control plants. Three plants from each treatment were uprooted, and the roots with attached soil were further used for isolation. These were diluted in serial dilutions in microtiter plates and incubated in a methane and air environment in a desiccator as described (Rahalkar et al. 2021). After 3-4 weeks, the grown dilutions were streaked on NMS agarose plates. Colonies were purified, and the cultures were microscopically observed. Pure cultures were further subjected to pmoA PCR and sequencing analysis.

2.5. Data Analysis

MS Excel was used to store the data and also for the fundamental analysis, like averages, standard deviation, etc. PCA analysis was carried out using PAST software (version 4.17) [10]. The difference between plant growth in terms of plant height, tiller numbers, panicle numbers, panicle height, grain yield in g per plant hill, 1000 grain weight in g

3. Results

3.1. Overall Health of the Plants and Early Flowering Seen in Methylomonas Kb3-Treated Plants

When compared to the control plants (plants that received no inoculation), all of the methanotroph-inoculated plants were generally green and healthy at every stage and displayed no discernible variations or adverse effects. Early blooming or flowering (about 10–12 days earlier than in the control and other treatments) was noted in cases where Methylomonas Kb3 was treated, which was evident by grain formation and drooping of the panicles due to the grain, whereas the control plants showed upright panicles with only flowers. On September 19, 2024, the day of the observations, 66% of the Kb3-treated plants displayed grain formation (4/6 plants). Conversely, the Methylomagnum KRF4 inoculation plants and the control plants displayed (Figure 2) only flowering and no grain formation. About 50% of the plants (3/6 plants) that were inoculated with a mixture of MOB, specifically Methylomonas Kb3 and Methylomagnum ishizawai KRF4, showed grain formation. While the remaining plants in the plot only displayed flowering or early grain production (early stages), it is evident that Methylomonas Kb3-treated plants and a few mixed MOB-treated plants displayed the grain maturation stage (which drooped owing to weight) (Figure 2).

3.2. Enhanced Growth Yield, Plant Height in Methylomonas Kb3-Treated Plants

Methylomonas strain Kb3 and MOB mix outperformed the others in terms of plant height, panicle height, and tiller development height (Table 1). Grain yield was also higher in plants treated with Methylomonas Kb3 after receiving combined MOB therapy.
Eight rice hills, each measuring around 100 cm by 50 cm (5000 cm2 = 0.5 square meter), were harvested for each treatment. The data were then extrapolated from grain yield in g/m2 to quintals/ha or tons/ha by multiplying by the factor. Treating plantlets with Methylomonas Kb3 at the transplantation stage was beneficial because the plant height increased by approximately 15% and the total grain yield increased by 17%, 61.06 quintals/ha total yield, which is approximately nine quintals/ha more than the control plants (Table 1, Figure 3b). With 59.99 quintals of grains/ha, Methylomonas Kb3+Methylomagnum KRF4 showed 8 quintals/ha more than the control plant yields (52.12 quintal/ha), (Table 1). The control showed about 52.13 grains in quintals/ha. Compared to the control plant yield, there was a 17% increase in grain yield in Kb3-treated plants, followed by the MOB mix (Kb3 + KRF4) with a 15% increase. The Methylomagnum KRF4 treatment did not appear to be helpful because the total grain production was only slightly less than the control grain output (50.5 quintals/ha). In terms of 1000-grain weight, KRF4 treatment showed a slightly higher weight compared to the other treatments; however, due to fewer panicles, the total grain yield was probably lower in the case of the KRF4 treatment (Table 1). The number of tillers, panicles, and panicle height were slightly higher in the treated plants; however, there was no significant difference in all the plants, control as well as inoculated. The total plant height was significantly higher in Methylomonas Kb3 inoculated plants and mixed MOB inoculated plants compared to the control. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was performed using all plant growth parameters listed in Table 2. The analysis revealed a clear separation between the plants inoculated with Kb3 and the Mix MOB, as compared to the control and KRF4 treatments. The first two principal components accounted for 90.6% of the total variance (Figure 3). Vectors associated with plant height, grain yield per hill, and estimated yield were closely aligned with Kb3 and MOB mix. In contrast, the control and KRF4 treatments clustered together in the left lower quadrant. Overall, the PCA effectively distinguished the different inoculation treatments based on plant growth parameters.

3.3. Re-Isolation of Methanotrophs

The serial endpoint dilution method was used for re-isolation of methanotrophs from the applied plants as described before [9]. Rice root samples with attached soil after about 27 days of transplantation at the tillering stage were used for the serial dilution in microtiter plates and isolation from the last dilutions. It was seen that methanotrophs grew till 10-8 dilution in the case of Methylomonas Kb3 and mixed MOB, showing characteristic pink color growth. In case of Methylomagnum KRF4, white growth was observed in the last positive dilutions, and microscopic examination revealed the presence of Methylomagnum ishizawai KRF4 cells Figure S1. Methylomonas Kb3 could be re-isolated from the enrichment culture done in an endpoint dilution series in liquid, followed by streaking on solid agarose plates. The colony morphology and cell morphology confirmed that Methylomonas-like cells were observed. Further, pmoA PCR amplification and sequencing of the isolate confirmed that the culture was indeed Methylomonas Kb3, which was associated with the rhizosphere soil. Similarly, in the case where KRF4 was applied, KRF4 was isolated along with some other methanotrophs. The morphology of KRF4 was again confirmed by microscopy; characteristic large, elliptical cells of Methylomagnum could be observed (Figure S1). As Methylomagnum ishizawai KRF4 has more than five μm in size and a distinct shape (Figure S1B), [9] it could be quickly confirmed using microscopic observation. In the control soil, the abundance of methanotrophs was less, i.e., growth was obtained only up to 10-3 or 10-4 dilution, and Type II-like methanotrophs (of the genera Methylosinus and Methylocystis were cultured (as depicted by microscopic observations and colony morphology, half-moon-shaped or pear-shaped: Methylosinus with cream-colored colonies and coccoid-shaped with white colonies: Methylocystis), Figure S1.

4. Discussion

4.1. Need for Novel Bio-Inoculants in Rice

Since rice is a staple in most countries, efforts must be made to cultivate paddy in a way that gives comparable grain yields with minimal requirements of N-based fertilizers like Urea, which are costly for both the environment and farmers, and emit less methane in order to meet the growing demand for nutritional needs. Utilizing Urea and other nitrogenous fertilizers degrades the land’s fertility and contaminates the surrounding waterways [11]. Therefore, it is imperative to move towards sustainable practices to continue supporting life on Earth. Rice cultivation has a higher requirement of nitrogenous fertilizers, usually supplied as Urea or DAP (diammonium phosphate). The consumption of Urea in India in the year 2022-2023 was 35.7 million tons. The Indian government is working on a national policy to boost local fertilizer manufacturing and reduce dependency on imports. Excessive and inefficient use of fertilizers leads to nutrient losses to the environment and could also result in drinking water contamination and impact human lives as a result of unsafe storage practices. Fertilizers are also hazardous to the environment and contribute largely to land, water, and air pollution [12]. As a result of the increasing population needs in the future, India will have a large requirement of food grains by 2050, 400 million tonnes, against the current production of 285 million tonnes [13]. Given the massive requirement for nutrients, the total nutrient needs of Indian soils cannot be met only through inorganic fertilizers. The efficiency of chemical fertilizers increases when used in combination with organic manure and biofertilizers. Chemical fertilizers are expensive to farmers, thus reducing their profit margins. Using fertilizers each consecutive year destroys the natural flora and fertility of the land. The run-offs from the fields enter water bodies, and the rich nitrogen and phosphate components encourage eutrophication-like conditions. Excess nitrogenous and sulfur emissions escape the atmosphere, contributing to the greenhouse effect [11]. Hence, a good alternative to chemical-based fertilizers is to use bacteria with plant growth-promoting abilities, which have been considered essential in enhancing plant health without being hazardous to the environment [14]. There is a growing need for efficient biofertilizers that can increase rice growth with minimal fertilizer input. To cover the demands of the growing population, there is a need for the use of fertilizers to ensure healthy crops with higher yields. Bioinoculants act as natural fertilizers for crops, promoting their growth while caring for their nitrogen requirements. Only a few bacteria that primarily fix atmospheric nitrogen are used as biofertilizers for rice cultivation. Both free-living diazotrophs, such as Azospirillum and Azotobacter, and Anabaena-Azolla-based fertilizers are being used for rice [15]. So far, bioinoculants have been successfully prepared using microbes like Trichoderma, Azospirillum, Azotobacter, Bacillus, Pseudomonas, etc., in the plant growth promotion of various crops in the form of solid encapsulation, liquid sprays, or emulsifiers [16]. Certain substitute agricultural practices like alternate wetting and drying, direct-seeded rice, and improved rice cultivars have been noted and published for their efficiency in curbing methane emissions. However, specific infrastructures are required, and educating the farmers about the standard methodologies is necessary.

4.2. Methanotrophs as a New Class of Bio-Inoculants

Methanotrophs, a unique class of prokaryotic bacteria, seem to have a solution to this problem, as they are one of the only known biological filters of methane [4]. Our research group has been a pioneer in isolating and cultivating methanotrophs in India and has been exploring the potential of methanotrophs in plant growth promotion for a few years [9,17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. Using a distinctive cultivation method to isolate methanotrophs, methanotrophs belonging to seven distinctive genera of three classes (Type Ia, Type Ib, and Type II) were cultured from rice fields in India [9]. As methanotrophs make up the natural rhizosphere flora of rice fields, it has been hypothesized that they may also contribute to the growth promotion in terms of increased biomass and grain yield by means such as nitrogen fixation [24].

4.3. Nitrogen Fixation by Methanotrophs

Methanotrophs also often possess nitrogen-fixation pathways and are active players in nitrogen fixation in rice roots [25]. As per an estimate, methanotrophs are capable of fixing 1.2 to 1014 g N/year [26] globally. The ability of methanotrophs to fix nitrogen has been demonstrated earlier in pure cultures [27] and by studying the nitrogen fixation genes/pathways [25]. Our recent studies, where we sequenced the draft genomes of methanotrophs that were isolated from Indian rice fields, all showed complete nitrogen fixation pathways, e.g., in Methylomonas sp., Methylococcus sp., Methylobacter sp., Methylolobus sp., etc. [24]. Stable isotope probing (SIP) experiments with 13CH4 and 15N2 [4] have recently verified that methanotroph-mediated nitrogen fixation occurs in rice roots. The nitrogen fixation in methane-consuming roots was found to be dominated by Methylomonas. The authors also noted that the microbial N2-fixing activity was stimulated by low nitrogen conditions [4].
In our first studies done in pots, we found that the use of selected methanotroph cultures as bioinoculants in rice agriculture promoted increased plant height, early flowering, and enhanced grain yield, as well as negligible methane emissions from the sites due to the high methane-oxidizing activity of the inoculated methanotrophs [24]. In these trials, Type I methanotrophs were observed to be better at increasing grain yield both individually and in consortia (~35%). In contrast, Type II methanotrophs increased plant height with no significant role in increasing grain yield when used individually, but increased grain yield and height when used in consortia (~12%). In contrast to the standard dosage used in India, which is approximately 150 kg N per ha or 135 kg Urea per acre, low nitrogen was applied in the trials, at about 10 or 47.5 kg of Urea per acre, or roughly 1/10th or 1/3rd of the amount of nitrogen, respectively [11]. Although it was conducted on a limited scale and with the farmer’s consent and assistance during the experiment, this field study is among the first to use pure cultures of methanotrophs in the field. In this case, the farmer had been applying 50 kg N/ha annually, which is roughly one-third to one-fourth of the dosage applied in a typical setting. (150 kg N/ha-200 kg N/ha). This land was perfect for our experimentation because the farmer had been cultivating with low nitrogen inputs for a long time. Usually, if the inorganic N fertilizer input is low, there is a chance that biological nitrogen fixation can take place in bacteria, as demonstrated in switchgrass [28]. Since Methylomonas Kb3 exhibits the genes for the nitrogen fixation pathway and is capable of growing in nitrogen-free environments, nitrogen fixation may be one of the factors contributing to increased plant growth output, even if we have not shown this to be the case [11,18]. More research is required to determine the causes of the increased yields and the role of nitrogen fixation. Due to the early grain formation and maturity observed in Methylomonas Kb3 inoculations, rice can mature faster, allowing farmers to harvest earlier. Recently, a rice variety has been developed in India, with early maturation and the advantages of 10-15 days early maturation, low nitrogen fertilizer requirement and thus, our results showing early maturation with Methylomonas Kb3 are essential. It was also observed that, in contrast to spraying or directly applying the methanotroph inoculant on the field, dipping rice roots during the transplantation stage was a more straightforward technique that farmers could readily adopt. The directly administered inoculum may wash out because the rice crop is frequently inundated. Similarly, because of the frequent rains during this time, it might not be feasible to spray the inoculum.

4.4. A Methanotroph, Methylococcus Capsulatus, Has Been Shown to Act as a Bio-Stimulant on Multiple Levels

Recently, a company in India (Stringbio, Bangalore, India) used a similar approach, and a methanotroph biostimulant (consisting of Methylococcus capsulatus termed CleanRise R) was used over three rice seasons in open-field studies, where up to 39% extra grain yield was obtained (under 100% fertilizer condition) and ~34% extra grain yield with 75% fertilizer application [29]. In the same study, it has also been claimed that there was a 30-60% reduction in methane emissions as the methanotroph bioinoculant was applied. The potential mechanisms for the microbial bio-stimulant effect on rice were due to indole acetic acid production, modulation of photosynthesis, tillering, and panicle development, which together resulted in a superior yield [29]. As this study used plant transcript analysis, there is now a stronger basis for the hypothesis that methanotrophs can be used for rice plant growth promotion and methane mitigation. Though this study used a single methanotroph (Methylococcus capsulatus), similar mechanisms could exist in the interactions of methanotrophs and rice plants, as similar basic biochemical pathways exist in most methanotrophs [4].
Methanotrophic bacteria have shown promise in improving plant growth and reducing methane emissions in rice paddies. Building on previous studies involving Methylococcus capsulatus [29]. Our present research explores the potential of Methylomonas Kb3, an indigenously isolated methanotroph, to enhance rice yield and sustainability. Inoculation with Methylomonas Kb3 resulted in a 17% increase in rice growth output compared to control plots. Productivity gains were achieved using only 1/3rd to 1/4th of the conventional nitrogen fertilizer dose, demonstrating improved nutrient efficiency and reduced environmental impact. The rice yield with Methylomonas Kb3 inoculation was 6.11 tons/ha, closely matching the 7 tons/ha yield of the Indrayani variety under full fertilizer and irrigation conditions (ref). The approach supports sustainable rice farming by lowering chemical input and potentially reducing methane emissions—a major greenhouse gas from flooded rice fields- and is a climate-smart approach. While not directly measured in this study, the use of methanotrophs like Methylomonas Kb3 may contribute to higher methane oxidation, warranting further investigation through multilocationtrials and methane flux assessments. Additional research is needed to explore the molecular basis of plant-microbe interactions, including transcriptomic analysis of rice plants inoculated with Methylomonas Kb3. Multi-site validation across Western India will help assess the consistency of yield improvements and environmental benefits. The method could complement emerging high-yielding, disease-resistant, and aromatic rice cultivars in India.

5. Conclusions

Two indigenously isolated methanotrophs, Methylomonas sp. and Methylomagnum sp., were used individually and, in combination, in a farmer’s field to check for plant growth promotion in rice. The farmer used a low amount of nitrogen fertilizer in the form of Urea (~50kg N/ha). It was seen that Methylomonas strain Kb3, which was indigenously isolated from Western India, was able to enhance rice plant growth yield by 17%, and in combination with Methylomagnum, the growth yield was improved by ~15%. Other parameters, such as plant height and panicle numbers, were also improved in these treatments. Although this was a single field experiment, the results show promising data with respect to the use of methanotrophs as plant growth-promoting agents in rice, and prompt us to do multilocation trials using this methanotroph for the region. As the world population increases and demand for rice is growing, the need for sustainable solutions is rising. Methanotrophs may offer a solution in terms of novel bio-inoculants, which may also enable enhanced oxidation of methane emitted from rice agriculture.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: Preprints.org, Figure S1: Colony morphology and phase contrast microscopic images of methanotrophs under 100X oil immersion: (A) Type II methanotrophs isolated from Malegaon control soil, and microscopic image; (B) Methylomagnum ishizawai strain KRF4 re-isolated from KRF4-treated rice plants, and microscopic image; (C) Methylomonas strain Kb3 re-isolated from treated Kb3 rice plants and microscopic image. Figure S2: Grain harvest stage: Kb3 inoculated plants can be seen, which have already lodged down (in the front). In the back, control plants can be seen.

Author Contributions

For research articles with several authors, a short paragraph specifying their individual contributions must be provided. The following statements should be used: “Conceptualization, M.C.R. and R.B.; methodology, R.B., S.M., K.P., S.K., Y.K., Y.P.; validation, S.M., K.P., S.K.; formal analysis, S.M., K.P., S.K.; writing—original draft preparation, S.M. and M.C.R.; writing—review and editing, M.C.R. and S.M.; visualization, R.B. and M.C.R.; supervision, M.C.R.; project administration, M.C.R.; funding acquisition, M.C.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.”

Funding

This research was funded by SERB (ANRF), grant number SPF/2022/000045.

Acknowledgments

We thank and express our gratitude to the rice farmer Mr. Shivajirao Gund (Malegaon village, Lavasa Road) for allowing us to conduct the experiments in his field. We are also thankful to his family and workers in the field for their kind cooperation and help. We thank Ms. Jyoti Mohite for her assistance during the cultivation of methanotroph cultures. K.P. thanks UGC for her junior research fellowship.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
Methane-oxidizing bacteria MOB

References

  1. Conrad, R. The global methane cycle: recent advances in understanding the microbial processes involved. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 2009, 1, 285–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Canadell, J.G.; Monteiro, P.M.S. Global Carbon and Other Biogeochemical Cycles and Feedback; 2021; pp. 673-779.
  3. Ganesan, A.; Rigby, M.; Lunt, M.F.; Parker, R.J.; Boesch, H.; Goulding, N.; Umezawa, T.; Zahn, A.; Chatterjee, A.; Prinn, R.G.; et al. Atmospheric observations show accurate reporting and little growth in India’s methane emissions. Nature Communications 2017, 8, 836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Hanson, R.S.; Hanson, T.E. Methanotrophic bacteria. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 1996, 60, 439–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gilbert, B.; Frenzel, P. Rice roots and CH4 oxidation: the activity of bacteria, their distribution and the microenvironment. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1998, 30, 1903–1916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hardoim, P.R.; Andreote, F.D.; Reinhold-Hurek, B.; Sessitsch, A.; van Overbeek, L.S.; van Elsas, J.D. Rice root-associated bacteria: insights into community structures across 10 cultivars. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 2011, 77, 154–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Wu, L.; Ma, K.; Lu, Y. Rice roots select for type I methanotrophs in rice field soil. Systematic and applied microbiology 2009, 32, 421–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ferrando, L.; Tarlera, S. Activity and diversity of methanotrophs in the soil-water interface and rhizospheric soil from a flooded temperate rice field. Journal of applied microbiology 2009, 106, 306–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rahalkar, M.; Khatri, K.; Pandit, P.S.; Bahulikar, R.; Mohite, J.A. Cultivation of Important Methanotrophs From Indian Rice Fields. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hammer, O.; Harper, D.A.T.; Ryan, P.D. PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Paleontologica Electronica 2001, 4, 9. [Google Scholar]
  11. Scagliola M; Valentinuzzi F; Mimmo T; Cesco S; C, C.; Y, P. Bioinoculants as Promising Complement of Chemical Fertilizers for a More Sustainable Agricultural Practice. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2021, 4, 622169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yuan, J.; Yuan, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Cao, L. Effects of different fertilizers on methane emissions and methanogenic community structures in paddy rhizosphere soil. Science of The Total Environment 2018, 627, 770–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. The Fertilizer Association of India, N.D. FAI Annual Seminar – 2019 on New Approach to Fertilizer Sector. 2019.
  14. Tallapragada, P.; Seshagiri, S. Application of Bioinoculants for Sustainable Agriculture. In Probiotics and Plant Health, Kumar, V., Kumar, M., Sharma, S., Prasad, R., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2017; pp. 473–495.
  15. Thomas, L.; Singh, I. Microbial Biofertilizers: Types and Applications. In Biofertilizers for Sustainable Agriculture and Environment Giri, B., Prasad, R., Wu, Q., Varma, A., Eds.; Soil Biology; Springer: 2019; Volume 55, pp. 1-19.
  16. Orozco-Mosqueda, M.D.C.; Rocha-Granados, M.D.C.; Glick, B.R.; Santoyo, G. Microbiome engineering to improve biocontrol and plant growth-promoting mechanisms. Microbiol. Res. 2018, 208, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Pandit, P.S.; Rahalkar, M.; Dhakephalkar, P.; Ranade, D.R.; Pore, S.; Arora, P.; Kapse, N. Deciphering community structure of methanotrophs dwelling in rice rhizospheres of an Indian rice field using cultivation and cultivation independent approaches. Microb. Ecol. 2016, 71, 634–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pandit, P.S.; Rahalkar, M.C. Renaming of ‘Candidatus Methylocucumis oryzae’ as Methylocucumis oryzae gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel Type I methanotroph isolated from India. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2019, 112, 955–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Pandit, P.S.; Ranade, D.R.; Dhakephalkar, P.K.; Rahalkar, M.C. A pmoA-based study reveals dominance of yet uncultured Type I methanotrophs in rhizospheres of an organically fertilized rice field in India. 3 Biotech 2016, 6, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Rahalkar, M.C.; Khatri, K.; Mohite, J.; Pandit, P.; Bahulikar, R. A novel Type I methanotroph Methylolobus aquaticus gen. nov. sp. nov. isolated from a tropical wetland. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2020, 113, 959–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Rahalkar, M.C.; Khatri, K.; Pandit, P.; Mohite, J. Polyphasic Characterization of Ca. Methylomicrobium oryzae: A Methanotroph Isolated from Rice Fields. Ind. J. Microbiol. 2024, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rahalkar, M.C.; Khatri, K.; Pandit, P.S.; Dhakephalkar, P.K. A putative novel Methylobacter member (KRF1) from the globally important Methylobacter clade 2: cultivation and salient draft genome features. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2019, 112, 1399–1408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Rahalkar, M.C.; Pandit, P. Genome-based insights into a putative novel Methylomonas species (strain Kb3), isolated from an Indian rice field. Gene Rep. 2018, 13, 9–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Mohite, J.; Khatri, K.; Pardhi, K.; Manvi, S.S.; Jadhav, R.; Rathod, S.; Rahalkar, M.C. Exploring the potential of methanotrophs for plant growth promotion in rice agriculture. Methane 2023, 2, 361–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Auman, A.J.; Speake, C.C.; Lidstrom, M.E. nifH Sequences and Nitrogen Fixation in Type I and Type II Methanotrophs. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2001, 67, 4009–4016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yuanfeng Cai; Yan Zheng; Paul L. E. Bodelier; Conrad, R.; Jia, Z. Conventional methanotrophs are responsible for atmospheric methane oxidation in paddy soils. Nature Communications 2016, 11728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Murrell, J.C.; Dalton, H. Nitrogen-fixation in obligate methanotrophs. Journal of General Microbiology 1983, 129, 3481–3486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bahulikar, R.A.; Chaluvadi, S.R.; Torres-Jerez, I.; Mosali, J.; Bennetzen, J.L.; Udvardi, M. Nitrogen Fertilization Reduces Nitrogen Fixation Activity of Diverse Diazotrophs in Switchgrass Roots. Phytobiomes 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kumar, S.R.; David, E.M.; Pavithra, G.J.; Kumar, G.S.; Subbian, E. Methane-derived microbial biostimulant reduces greenhouse gas emissions and improves rice yield. Front. Plant Sci. 2024, 15, 1432460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. a: Various stages of the field experiment conducted in Malegaon, off Lavasa road near Pune, in a farmer’s field.
Figure 1. a: Various stages of the field experiment conducted in Malegaon, off Lavasa road near Pune, in a farmer’s field.
Preprints 176775 g001a
Figure 1. b: Transplantation of the treated plants in 4m x 3m plots in a flooded rice field in a randomized design was done (July 3 2024).
Figure 1. b: Transplantation of the treated plants in 4m x 3m plots in a flooded rice field in a randomized design was done (July 3 2024).
Preprints 176775 g001b
Figure 2. Early flowering and grain formation were observed in rice plants inoculated with Methylomonas Kb3. In the background, control plants can be seen (Observations taken on September 19, 2024, ~ 100 days after sowing).
Figure 2. Early flowering and grain formation were observed in rice plants inoculated with Methylomonas Kb3. In the background, control plants can be seen (Observations taken on September 19, 2024, ~ 100 days after sowing).
Preprints 176775 g002
Figure 3. Principal component analysis (PCA) based on the effect of inoculation of methanotrophs on plant growth parameters. The first two coordinates contribute to 90.6% of % variance.
Figure 3. Principal component analysis (PCA) based on the effect of inoculation of methanotrophs on plant growth parameters. The first two coordinates contribute to 90.6% of % variance.
Preprints 176775 g003
Table 1. Comparison of various treatments and their effect on plant growth and yield.
Table 1. Comparison of various treatments and their effect on plant growth and yield.
Treatment Total Plant height
cm
No. of Tillers No. of Panicles Panicle height
cm
Weight of 1000 grains g Average grain weight per hill g Yield quintal per ha Increased in yield
Kb3 106.8+/-4.6 19+/-3 18+/-3 22.8+/-1.5 20.01 38.1 61.06 17%
KRF4 96.0+/-6 17+/-3 15+/-1 23.3+/-2.2 22.71 31.6 50.5 Little decrease (-3%)
Kb3 + KRF4 (MOB mix) 101.8+/-6.4 18+/-3 16+/-3 24.1+/-1.2 21.59 37.5 59.99 15%
Control 94.8+/-6.4 19+/-3 17+/-3 23.3+/-1.3 20.68 32.6 52.13 Control yield
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated