Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Quantifying the Effect of Pre-Ovulatory Exposure to Extreme (High or Low) Blood Urea Nitrogen Concentration on the Progression of Bovine Oocytes to Embryos In Vitro

Submitted:

25 August 2025

Posted:

26 August 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
This study investigated the impact of exposure of developing bovine oocytes in pre-ovulatory follicles to extreme blood urea nitrogen (BUN) concentrations in vivo on bovine oocyte development in vitro. In situations where pasture or ration components fall short of meeting dietary protein requirements, dietary supplementation is often necessary. Both high and low supplementation levels are linked to altered BUN concentrations, adversely affecting reproductive performance. The specific time of exposure to extreme BUN concentrations (7mg/dL > BUN > 20mg/dL) causing diminished reproductive performance remains elusive, as does the stage at which embryonic development is impacted. This research used 800 oocytes that were aspirated from cows with normal BUN concentration (7mg/dL < BUN concentration < 20 mg/dL) and 409 that were retrieved from cows with extreme BUN concentrations to investigate the effect of in vivo exposure of bovine oocytes to extreme BUN levels on the developmental competence of embryos in vitro. The BUN concentration status of donor cows affected the in vitro survival of oocytes and subsequent embryos, with oocytes from cows with extreme BUN concentration having a 1.18 times (95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.36) higher rate of failing to develop to the blastocyst stage. Exposing bovine oocytes to extreme (low or high) BUN concentrations before ovulation reduced their progression to embryos in vitro, which implies that extreme BUN concentrations might affect bovine fertility for extended periods of time, even after the normalisation of BUN concentrations in an animal.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Cattle are often supplemented with dietary protein because pasture or pasture-based roughages alone might not meet their dietary requirements. Protein is needed for the maintenance of body condition and production, but high levels of dietary protein lead to elevated blood urea nitrogen (BUN) concentrations, which have been associated with reduced reproductive performance in beef and dairy cattle [1,2,3]. Low BUN concentrations are also detrimental to reproductive performance as they indicate protein deficiency [4].
Although the mechanism by which elevated BUN concentration negatively affects reproductive performance is not fully understood, elevated BUN concentration is associated with an altered composition of uterine fluids [5] and has detrimental effects on the oocyte or embryo before it reaches the uterus [2]. In-vitro studies have demonstrated that high urea nitrogen concentration in the maturation medium disrupts oocyte maturation and fertilisation [6,7]. High levels of ammonia (associated with high BUN concentrations) can be toxic to oocytes, spermatocytes, and early embryos [8,9]. Elevated blood or milk urea nitrogen concentration before breeding has been associated with longer days to pregnancy in beef [3] and dairy cattle [1].
Although these studies attempted to establish the developmental stage at which the oocytes and zygotes are vulnerable to the negative effects of extreme BUN concentrations, the specific period of vulnerability remains unknown. It can be anything from the initial stages of oocyte development to the early stages of embryonal development. The present study investigated whether in vivo exposure of oocytes (before ovulation) to extreme BUN concentrations influences their progression to the blastocyst stage in vitro.
The cattle used in this study were the same as the ones from our previous reports [10,11].
Non-pregnant, non-lactating Nguni (n = 12) and Hereford (n = 10) cows from private cow-calf enterprises were obtained for this study. All cows were housed at the Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, for the duration of the study. Cows were between 2 and 16 years of age and were housed in four pens according to breed and dietary treatment. At arrival, the reproductive tracts of all cows were examined ultrasonographically (Mindray, micro convex 5MHz transducer, Taiwan) to determine pregnancy status, ovarian function and antral follicle count (AFC) [12]. Ovaries with corpora lutea or a follicle with a diameter of at least 13mm were defined as being active [13]. Cows with inactive ovaries were excluded from the study.
Cows were assigned to two isocaloric dietary treatment groups (Table 1) using stratified randomization by breed and AFC. All diets were formulated using the same feed ingredients at different inclusion levels. A high (14%) protein diet (HCP) was produced by adding 20kg of feed-grade urea (KK Animal Nutrition, South Africa) to a ton of the normal (7.9%) crude protein (NCP) diet, while the low (4.4%) crude protein (LCP) diet was produced by reducing the inclusion rates of urea and other protein sources in the diet. During the first phase of the experiment, the first group of cows was fed the NCP diet while the other group was fed the HCP diet. A cross-over design was utilized during the first phase, where diets were switched after six weeks, and the cows remained on the new diets for another six weeks. At the end of this phase, cows had a one-week washout period wherein they were fed the NCP diet. After the washout period, cows were randomized again into two new groups for the second phase of the experiment, using a similar randomization process. The new groups were fed either the NCP or LCP diet for four weeks, after which the cows were put on natural pasture for an additional three weeks. After three weeks, diets were switched again like the first phase, and the groups remained on the new diets for another four weeks.
Feed-grade urea content was increased over four weeks (weekly increments of 5kg of feed-grade urea per ton of feed) to adapt cows to the HCP diet. Cows were allowed to acclimatize to each new diet for at least two weeks before sampling was performed. All groups were fed twice daily, at 07h00 and 16h00, throughout the study. Feed delivery was kept constant at 2.5% dry matter per kg body weight daily with minor adjustments based on the amount of left-over feed. Cows of the same breed were housed together, but separate pens were used for each diet treatment group (four independent pens).
Blood sampling and analysis
Once acclimatization to new diets was completed, blood sampling was performed twice weekly, on Mondays and Wednesdays, for 22 total collections. Animals were restrained in a chute for all sampling procedures on each sampling day. Sampling started two hours after the delivery of the morning feed. Blood was drawn from the coccygeal vein into evacuated 4-ml serum tubes (Becton Dickinson; BD vacutainer CAT, silicone clot activator). Tubes were centrifuged at 3000 x g for 10 minutes to obtain serum, which was frozen at -80 °C within 2 hours of collection. Serum samples were analysed for BUN concentration using an auto-analyser machine (Cobas Integra 400 plus; Roche, Switzerland) within 30 days of sampling.
Follicular aspiration and processing
Oocyte and follicular fluid collection were performed via ultrasound-guided aspiration immediately after blood sampling. Epidural anaesthesia was performed by administering 5 ml of 2% lignocaine hydrochloride according to a standardized protocol [14] before aspiration. An aspiration probe (Watanabe Technologia Applicada, Brazil) with a 7.5 MHz transducer and needle guidance system, a 19-gauge 38.1mm long hypodermic needle and a vacuum pressure of 80mmHg was used for aspiration. Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (Onderstepoort Biological Products, South Africa), supplemented with 5% foetal bovine serum (Life Technologies, South Africa) and maintained at 38 °C, was used as the flushing medium.
The probe was introduced deep into the vagina while the ovary was immobilized per rectum. The ultrasound image aided in guiding the needle towards the follicles. All follicles with a diameter of 3mm or greater were aspirated. Searching for cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) was completed within 30 minutes of aspiration.
Recovered oocytes were graded into usable and non-usable (degenerate) oocytes [15]. In both phases of the study, oocytes from each sampling day were pooled into 4 groups based on breed and diet. All degenerate oocytes were discarded. The weighted mean BUN concentration for each pool was determined based on the proportion of oocytes in the pool contributed by each cow. The COCs were washed twice in Hepes-buffered solution (Sigma-Aldrich, South Africa) before being transferred into maturation media, prepared according to the Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria in vitro fertilization (IVF) protocol [16]. The COCs were matured for 24 hours in a 5% CO2 incubator at 38.5 °C. Mechanical denudation of oocytes was performed by gentle pipetting before fertilization.
Frozen semen straws derived from a single proven in-vitro fertilization bull were thawed by immersion in 37 °C water for one minute. Semen was purified by transferring straw contents onto a BoviPure® gradient (Nidacon Laboratories AB, Göthenburg, Sweden) and centrifuging at 300 x g for 20 minutes. The subsequent pellet was suspended in the purification medium and centrifuged again at 300 x g for an additional 10 minutes. The resultant pellet was then resuspended, and 10μl of the suspension (concentration = 1 x 106 spermatozoa/ml) was transferred to 40μl droplets of mineral oil containing pooled matured oocytes and incubated in a 5% CO2 atmosphere for 18-20 hours at 38.5 °C. After insemination, zygotes were denuded of sperm droplets and the remaining cumulus by vortexing. This was followed by washing with early synthetic oviduct fluid (ESOF) and culturing for 4 days, after which the ESOF was replaced with late synthetic oviduct fluid (LSOF). Embryos were graded on days 2, 4, 7 and 8 according to the International Embryo Transfer Society [17], and developmental stages were recorded.
Statistical analyses
BUN concentration data were categorised as normal or extreme concentrations. The normal category was defined as BUN concentration data between 7mg/dL and 20mg/dL [4,18], while the extreme category consisted of BUN concentrations outside this range.
The chi-squared test was used to compare the proportion of oocytes recovered per each follicle aspirated, and to compare proportions of various grades of oocytes recovered, per category (normal vs. extreme BUN). A Mann-Whitney U test was performed to investigate whether the distribution of oocyte grades was similar between oocytes obtained from cows with normal and extreme BUN concentrations. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was performed to assess the effects of in vivo exposure to extreme BUN concentrations on oocyte development in vitro. The outcome variable was whether oocyte development became arrested. The time variable for the analysis was the stage of development (i.e., maturation, IVF, cleavage, morula stage, early blastocyst stage and the blastocyst stage). Dietary treatment was included as a stratifying factor to adjust for the pooling of oocytes and subsequent statistical dependence. A second model (Model 2), which incorporated an interaction term between Breed and BUN concentration, was created to assess if Breed and BUN concentration acted independently. Breed was forced into all models because it was an exposure variable of interest.
Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics Version 24 (International Business Machines Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) and MINITAB Statistical Software, Release 13.32 (Minitab Inc., State College, Pennsylvania, USA). Statistical significance was established as P < 0.05.

3. Results

A total of 1601 oocytes were recovered, of which 76% (1209/1601) were usable (grade 1 to 4) and transferred to the maturation media (Table 2).
There was no difference in the proportion of oocytes recovered per each follicle aspirated (number of oocytes recovered ÷ number of follicles aspirated), between cows with normal and those with extreme BUN concentrations (0.37 and 0.36, respectively, P = 0.196). Distributions of oocytes per each oocyte grade category (Grade 1 – 4 and degenerate) were not different between oocytes obtained from cows with normal and those with extreme BUN concentrations (P = 0.237).
The rate of failure to develop to the blastocyst stage was 1.18 times higher (P = 0.020) in oocytes from cows with (weighted average) extreme BUN concentrations compared with those from cows with (weighted average) normal BUN concentrations (Model 1; Table 3). Oocytes from Hereford cows with extreme BUN concentration had a 1.32 times higher (P = 0.006) rate of failure (Model 2; Table 3) whilst those from Nguni cows with extreme BUN concentration only had a 1.05 times higher rate of failure (obtained by adding the   β ^ values for BUN concentration and the interaction term from Model 2) but this breed effect was not statistically significant (P = 0.125).
The hazard for arrested development remained low for both cohorts until the cleavage stage (Figure 1), whereafter it increased more for oocytes harvested from cows with extreme BUN when compared to those harvested from cows with normal BUN concentration (P < 0.001).
Extreme BUN – Blood urea nitrogen concentration in this range (7mg/dL > BUN > 20mg/dL); Normal BUN - Blood urea nitrogen concentration in this range (7mg/dL < BUN < 20mg/dL [4,18]); Embryonal development stages 1 = maturation; 2 = in vitro fertilisation; 3 = cleavage; 4 = morula stage; 5 = early blastocyst stage

4. Discussion

This study investigated the impact of in vivo exposure of oocytes to extreme (high or low) BUN concentrations on the subsequent survival of IVF-derived embryos, noting that antral follicle count in cattle is a repeatable measure strongly correlated with the number of healthy ovarian follicles [19,20]. BUN concentration also did not affect the grade of oocyte harvested, seeing that the proportions of oocytes recovered in each grade were not different between the two groups, which is consistent with previous studies [9,19,20]. Previous exposure to extreme BUN concentrations in this study did not affect oocyte recovery from follicles during OPU.Oocytes recovered from cows with extreme BUN concentrations were more likely to fail to progress to the blastocyst stage by Day 8, despite being morphologically similar to those recovered from cows with normal BUN concentrations. To the knowledge of the authors, the effect of prior exposure of COCs to extreme BUN concentrations has not been previously quantified.
Previous studies estimated the negative effect of high concentrations of urea or ammonia on reproductive performance [5,21,22]. This suggests that the developmental environment of the oocyte/embryo is important in determining its competence. More recent studies [23,24,25], including the current one, suggest that it is not only the developmental environment that determines oocyte survival but also previous exposure to extreme BUN concentrations. Our experimental design enabled us to provide the same conditions for all the oocytes in vitro, which was important for ensuring that the observed effects were purely due to previous exposure to extreme BUN concentration and not the current environment of the oocyte and embryo during development. This agrees with our previous study [3], which found that BUN concentration measured one week before the onset of the breeding season was associated with the number of days to pregnancy but not the pregnancy status of beef heifers. This finding suggested that previous exposure of developing oocytes to high BUN concentrations continued to influence oocytes after fertilisation. It has been shown in vitro that urea reduces oocyte competence by changing gene expression in resultant embryos, which is associated with an upregulation of the turnover of certain amino acids, resulting in amino acid imbalances [23,25].
Negative effects of previous exposure to extreme BUN concentrations were observed mainly at the cleavage, morula and early blastocyst stages, which is consistent with previous studies [24].
Bovine antral follicles require approximately 40 days to become mature Graafian follicles [26,27]. Therefore, oocytes that were aspirated in this study were somewhere in their final 40 days of maturation. Although the exact age of the follicles was not known, it is possible that exposure to extreme BUN concentration in vivo, up to 40 days before the onset of breeding, could still have detrimental effects on the competence of oocytes. This is an important finding to consider in the nutritional management of cattle production systems. The reason is that an isolated period of extreme BUN concentration as a result of a ration mixing error could affect oocyte viability far beyond the time that such an effect is measurable in the animals. This might explain observations reported previously where heifers with relatively high BUN concentration within a herd exposed to a high crude protein diet, were at risk of reproductive failure for up to 3 months after the event (Tshuma et al., 2014). This has even further implications when we consider other factors (other than diet composition) that have been demonstrated to affect BUN concentration in cows. Some of these factors are not easy to control through improved management. Heat stress for example, has been shown to independently result in a significant increase in MUN concentration [28], which now means that a period of heat stress as a result of extreme temperature or humidity over a short period could in fact affect the fertility of cows for several weeks thereafter, due to the lingering negative effect of BUN on oocyte competence. It could be hypothesised that this effect might at least be partially responsible for seasonal differences in the reproductive performance of dairy cows [29].
The effects of donor cow age on the survival of embryos could not be accounted for in this model. However, the authors believe that breed might incorporate the effect of age because very old cows belonged to one breed (Nguni) in this study.
Although not statistically significant, adding the interaction term between breed and BUN concentration category seems to suggest that BUN concentration did not influence the survival of oocytes from Nguni cows. This might explain, in part, the previous observation that Nguni cows maintained good fertility during periods of restricted protein availability [28,29]. In our previous study, we concluded that Nguni cows receiving high-protein diets managed to prevent their BUN concentration from reaching threshold levels that impact oocyte quality [10], but the current study demonstrates that the oocytes themselves might also have some inherent resilience to the effects of extreme BUN concentration. However, we suggest that this hypothesis should receive more research attention.
Results obtained in vitro have their limitations when predicting what would happen in vivo. Oocytes in this study were selected based on their morphological appearance, which is not the case in vivo. This selection might have introduced some bias, and hence, the study might only partially explain the effects of previous exposure to extreme BUN concentrations. Other possible limitations of this study include the limited sample size and limited breed distribution (especially considering that breed effects might exist), the lack of individual data at the oocyte level due to pooling during the IVF procedures, and the extreme diets that cows in this experiment consumed, that might not represent reality in a commercial farming system.
Despite having localized the period during which the negative effects of urea are exerted to the period before ovulation, it is possible that urea can also affect the fertility of cattle at other periods, as suggested by other studies [30,31].

5. Conclusions

Exposure of bovine oocytes in vivo (i.e. already before ovulation) to extreme (low or high) BUN concentration reduces their chances of progressing to embryos. The estimated hazard ratio would be useful in simulation models that seek to determine the hidden cost of extreme BUN concentrations in cattle production systems.

6. Patents

Not applicable.

Supplementary Materials

Not applicable.

Author Contributions

“Conceptualization, D.H. and T.T.; methodology, D.H., M.S., G.F. and T.T.; validation, D.H., G.F. and M.S.; formal analysis, G.F., D.H., M.S. and T.T.; investigation, T.T.; data collection, T.T., D.H, and R.H.; data curation, G.F. and T.T.; writing—original draft preparation, T.T.; writing—review and editing, T.T., D.H., G.F., R.H. and M.S.; visualization, T.T.; supervision, D.H. and G.F.; project administration, D.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.”

Funding

This research was funded by the Gauteng Department of Agriculture and Rural Development (14).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria (protocol code AEC V086 -14 and dated November 2014).

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent for publication was obtained from an authorized agent for the owner.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to the protection of the client’s privacy.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the participating farmer for providing the cows and the Gauteng Department of Agriculture and Rural Development for providing the funding for this project.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Guo, K.; Russek-Cohen, E.; A. VArner, M.; Kohn, R. Effects of Milk Urea Nitrogen and Other Factors on Probability of Conception of Dairy Cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2004, 87, 1878–1885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Rhoads, M.; Rhoads, R.; Gilbert, R.; Toole, R.; Butler, W. Detrimental effects of high plasma urea nitrogen levels on viability of embryos from lactating dairy cows. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2006, 91, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Tshuma, T.; Holm, D.E.; Fosgate, G.T.; Lourens, D.C. Pre-breeding blood urea nitrogen concentration and reproductive performance of Bonsmara heifers within different management systems. Trop. Anim. Heal. Prod. 2014, 46, 1023–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Carlsson, J.; Pehrson, B. The Relationships Between Seasonal Variations in the Concentration of Urea in Bulk Milk and the Production and Fertility of Dairy Herds. J. Veter- Med. Ser. A 1993, 40, 205–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Rhoads, M.; Gilbert, R.; Lucy, M.; Butler, W. Effects of Urea Infusion on the Uterine Luminal Environment of Dairy Cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2004, 87, 2896–2901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ocon, O.; Hansen, P. Disruption of Bovine Oocytes and Preimplantation Embryos by Urea and Acidic pH. J. Dairy Sci. 2003, 86, 1194–1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. De Wit, A.; Cesar, M.; Kruip, T. Effect of Urea During In Vitro Maturation on Nuclear Maturation and Embryo Development of Bovine Cumulus-Oocyte-Complexes. J. Dairy Sci. 2001, 84, 1800–1804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hammon, D.; Holyoak, G.; Dhiman, T. Association between blood plasma urea nitrogen levels and reproductive fluid urea nitrogen and ammonia concentrations in early lactation dairy cows. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2005, 86, 195–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ferreira, F.A.; Gomez, R.G.G.; Joaquim, D.C.; Watanabe, Y.F.; de Castro e Paula, L.A.; Binelli, M.; Rodrigues, P.H.M. Short-term urea feeding decreases in vitro hatching of bovine blastocysts. Theriogenology 2011, 76, 312–319.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hamman, R.; Thompson, P.N.; Smuts, M.P.; Tshuma, T.; Holm, D.E. Oocyte quality and viability in Nguni and Hereford cows exposed to different levels of dietary protein. Trop. Anim. Heal. Prod. 2019, 51, 1187–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tshuma, T.; Fosgate, G.T.; Hamman, R.; Holm, D.E. Effect of different levels of dietary nitrogen supplementation on the relative blood urea nitrogen concentration of beef cows. Trop. Anim. Heal. Prod. 2019, 51, 1883–1891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Fricke, P. Scanning the Future—Ultrasonography as a Reproductive Management Tool for Dairy Cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 2002, 85, 1918–1926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Holm, D.E.; Nielen, M.; Jorritsma, R.; Irons, P.C.; Thompson, P.N. Ultrasonographic reproductive tract measures and pelvis measures as predictors of pregnancy failure and anestrus in restricted bred beef heifers. Theriogenology 2016, 85, 495–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Pande, M.; Srivastava, N.; Soni, Y.; Kumar, S.; Singh, J.; Chand, N.; Saha, S.; Mathur, A. Comparative efficacy of the therapeutics of recurrent genital prolapse in indigenous cows. Theriogenology Insight - Int. J. Reprod. all Anim. 2017, 7, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gordon, I. , Recovering the bovine oocyte, in Laboratory production of cattle embryos. 2003. p. 79–112.
  16. Jooste, F. , The association between foot-and-mouth disease virus and bovine oocytes and embryos during in vitro embryo production, in Production Animal Studies. 2005, University of Pretoria. p. 111.
  17. Wright, J.M. , Photographic illustrations of embryo developmental stage and quality codes, in Manual of the International Embryo Transfer Society, D.A. Stringfellow and S.M. Siedel, Editors. 1998, IETS, Savoy: Illinois. p. 167 – 170.
  18. Ferguson, J.D.; Galligan, D.T.; Blanchard, T.; Reeves, M. Serum Urea Nitrogen and Conception Rate: The Usefulness of Test Information. J. Dairy Sci. 1993, 76, 3742–3746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Garcia-Bojalil, C.; Staples, C.; Thatcher, W.; Drost, M. Protein Intake and Development of Ovarian Follicles and Embryos of Superovulated Nonlactating Dairy Cows. J. Dairy Sci. 1994, 77, 2537–2548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dawuda, P.; Scaramuzzi, R.; Leese, H.; Hall, C.; Peters, A.; Drew, S.; Wathes, D. Effect of timing of urea feeding on the yield and quality of embryos in lactating dairy cows. Theriogenology 2002, 58, 1443–1455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kenny, D.A.; Boland, M.P.; Diskin, M.G.; Sreenan, J.M. Effect of rumen degradable protein with or without fermentable carbohydrate supplementation on blood metabolites and embryo survival in cattle. Anim. Sci. 2002, 74, 529–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sinclair, K.D.; Kuran, M.; E Gebbie, F.; Webb, R.; McEvoy, T.G. Nitrogen metabolism and fertility in cattle: II. Development of oocytes recovered from heifers offered diets differing in their rate of nitrogen release in the rumen. J. Anim. Sci. 2000, 78, 2670–2680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kowsar, R.; Izadi, F.; Sadeghi, N.; Riasi, A.; Zadegan, F.G.; Hajian, M.; Nasr-Esfahani, M.H.; Farrokhpour, H.; Miyamoto, A. Urea changes oocyte competence and gene expression in resultant bovine embryo in vitro. Zygote 2018, 26, 207–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Santos, P.; Marques, A.; Antunes, G.; Chaveiro, A.; Andrade, M.; Borba, A.; Da Silva, F.M. Effects of Plasma Urea Nitrogen Levels on the Bovine Oocyte Ability to Develop After In vitro Fertilization. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2009, 44, 783–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kowsar, R.; Iranshahi, V.N.; Sadeghi, N.; Riasi, A.; Miyamoto, A. Urea influences amino acid turnover in bovine cumulus-oocyte complexes, cumulus cells and denuded oocytes, and affects in vitro fertilization outcome. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 12191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Britt, J.H. Oocyte development in cattle: physiological and genetic aspects. Rev. Bras. de Zootec. 2008, 37, 110–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Aerts, J.; Bols, P. Ovarian Follicular Dynamics: A Review with Emphasis on the Bovine Species. Part I: Folliculogenesis and Pre-antral Follicle Development. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2010, 45, 171–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tshuma, T.; Fosgate, G.; Webb, E.; Swanepoel, C.; Holm, D. Effect of Temperature and Humidity on Milk Urea Nitrogen Concentration. Animals 2023, 13, 295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. de Vries, A.; Risco, C. Trends and Seasonality of Reproductive Performance in Florida and Georgia Dairy Herds from 1976 to 2002. J. Dairy Sci. 2005, 88, 3155–3165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Leroy, J.; Van Soom, A.; Opsomer, G.; Goovaerts, I.; Bols, P. Reduced Fertility in High-yielding Dairy Cows: Are the Oocyte and Embryo in Danger? Part II Mechanisms Linking Nutrition and Reduced Oocyte and Embryo Quality in High-yielding Dairy Cows*. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2008, 43, 623–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Hammon, D.; Wang, S.; Holyoak, G. Effects of ammonia during different stages of culture on development of in vitro produced bovine embryos. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2000, 59, 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Cumulative hazards curve for oocytes from cows with normal and extreme blood urea nitrogen (BUN) concentration. Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to estimate time-to-event outcomes of IVF-derived embryos following in vivo exposure to extreme BUN concentrations. Data were collected from 21 cows from August 2014 to February 2015 at the Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria in South Africa.
Figure 1. Cumulative hazards curve for oocytes from cows with normal and extreme blood urea nitrogen (BUN) concentration. Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to estimate time-to-event outcomes of IVF-derived embryos following in vivo exposure to extreme BUN concentrations. Data were collected from 21 cows from August 2014 to February 2015 at the Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria in South Africa.
Preprints 173834 g001
Table 1. Estimated nutritional values of three diets that were used to manipulate BUN concentration in cows that were used to investigate the effect of exposure to extreme BUN concentration (in vivo) on the survival (in vitro) of IVF-derived embryos. Data were collected from 21 cows from August 2014 to February 2015 at the Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria in South Africa.
Table 1. Estimated nutritional values of three diets that were used to manipulate BUN concentration in cows that were used to investigate the effect of exposure to extreme BUN concentration (in vivo) on the survival (in vitro) of IVF-derived embryos. Data were collected from 21 cows from August 2014 to February 2015 at the Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria in South Africa.
Diet
LCP NCP HCP
Dry matter % 89.5 89.6 89.8
Crude protein %a 4.4 7.9 14
RUP as a % of crude proteina 42.6 36.9 36.1
Fat %a 2 2.3 2.3
Total digestible nutrients %a 48.9 52.6 51.5
a - Measured on a dry matter basis; LCP - diet formulated to provide 4.4% crude protein; NCP - diet formulated to provide 7.9% crude protein; HCP - diet formulated to provide 14% crude protein; RUP - rumen degradable protein as a percentage of crude protein.
Table 2. Antral follicle counts and oocyte grades recovered from cows with normal and extreme BUN concentration in a study to investigate the effect of exposure to extreme BUN concentration (in vivo) on the survival (in vitro) of IVF-derived embryos. Data were collected from 21 cows from August 2014 to February 2015 at the Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria in South Africa.
Table 2. Antral follicle counts and oocyte grades recovered from cows with normal and extreme BUN concentration in a study to investigate the effect of exposure to extreme BUN concentration (in vivo) on the survival (in vitro) of IVF-derived embryos. Data were collected from 21 cows from August 2014 to February 2015 at the Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria in South Africa.
Normal BUN
(7mg/dL<BUN<20mg/dL)
Extreme BUN
(20mg/dL<BUN<7mg/dL)
Total
Aspiration sessions    22    22
Antral follicles counted    2743    1585    4328
Recovered oocyte grades    Grade 1    16 (2%)    12 (2%)    28
   Grade 2    49 (5%)    28 (5%)    77
   Grade 3    283 (28%)    143 (25%)    426
   Grade 4    452 (44%)    226 (39%)    678
   Degenerate    228 (22%)    164 (29%)    392
Total oocytes    1028    573    1601
BUN - Blood urea nitrogen concentration; Grade – grades that were assigned to recovered oocytes based on the number of anomalies [15].
Table 3. Effects of exposure to extreme BUN concentration on the degeneration (lack of development) of bovine oocytes. Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed to assess the effects of in vivo exposure to extreme BUN concentration on the development of IVF-derived embryos in vitro. Data were collected from 21 cows from August 2014 to February 2015 at the Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, in South Africa.
Table 3. Effects of exposure to extreme BUN concentration on the degeneration (lack of development) of bovine oocytes. Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed to assess the effects of in vivo exposure to extreme BUN concentration on the development of IVF-derived embryos in vitro. Data were collected from 21 cows from August 2014 to February 2015 at the Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, in South Africa.
Model Variable β ^ SE HR 95% CI of HR P value
Lower Upper
Model 1 BUN 0.167 0.072 1.181 1.027 1.360 0.020
Breed -0.021 0.069 0.979 0.856 1.120 0.757
Model 2 BUN 0.274 0.100 1.316 1.082 1.599 0.006
Breed 0.060 0.087 1.062 0.896 1.258 0.488
Breed*BUN -0.223 0.145 0.800 0.601 1.064 0.125
Breed*BUN - interaction term between breed and BUN concentration; BUN - blood urea nitrogen concentration; CI - confidence interval; β ^ - estimate of the slope parameter; HR - Hazard Ratio, an exponential of β ^ ; Model 1 - Model adjusted for the effects of breed; Model 2 - Model adjusted for the effects of breed and the interaction between breed and BUN; SE - standard error.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated