Preprint
Case Report

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Sustentaculoma of the Adrenal Medulla in a Young Japanese Male Patient Observed for an Extended Period After Surgery

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

01 August 2025

Posted:

15 August 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
This report describes an exceptionally rare case of sustentaculoma, a morphologically distinctive neoplasm of the left adrenal medulla, in a 39-year-old Japanese male. No hormones showed abnormal elevation. There were no signs of hyperglycemia or hypertension, and his medical and family history showed no significant findings. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a well-defined, smoothly bordered left adrenal tumor measuring 3.3 × 2.3 cm. Macroscopically, the neoplasm presented as a well-defined solid mass measuring 3.5 × 2.7 × 2.5 cm, exhibiting a grayish-white coloration. Histologically, it was encapsulated by a thin fibrous capsule. The neoplasm comprised irregularly sized solid nests and collagenous fibrosis in the stroma; the neoplastic cells featured round nuclei and eosinophilic cytoplasm with indistinct cellular boundaries. Immunohistochemical staining revealed positivity for vimentin, S-100 protein, CD56 (NCAM), CD45 (LCA), and CD68 (KP-1). Electron microscopy showed numerous spherical mitochondria within the cytoplasm, interspersed with pseudomesaxons among the cells. The patient has been closely monitored in the urology outpatient department, and as of 16 years post-surgery, no recurrence or metastasis has been observed. This case is particularly rare; to our knowledge, it represents the second reported instance globally.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Histologically, the adrenal medulla primarily comprises chromaffin cells, whereas smaller cell populations in the adrenal medulla consist of ganglion and sustentacular cells [1]. Sustentaculoma of the adrenal medulla is an extremely rare tumor, first reported by Lau et al. in 2006 [2]. It is characterized by differentiation into sustentacular cells and shows positivity for S-100 protein, CD56 (NCAM), and vimentin on immunohistochemical staining [2].
We present a rare case of sustentaculoma occurring in the left adrenal gland of a young Japanese man in whom we performed histological, immunohistochemical, and ultrastructural examinations. The patient was followed for 16 years post-surgery without recurrence or metastasis and remains in good health. We present this case, accompanied by relevant literature for reference.

2. Detailed Case Description

During a routine check-up of a 39-year-old Japanese man, a mass was detected in his left adrenal gland by ultrasound. Thereafter, he visited the urology outpatient clinic at Shimada Municipal Hospital in Shimada, Shizuoka, Japan. His serum cortisol level was 7.5 μg/dL (normal range: 4.0–18.5 μg/dL); aldosterone, 70.0 pg/mL (normal range: 30–160 pg/mL); renin activity, 1.0 ng/mL/hr (normal range: 0.1–2.0 ng/mL/hr); epinephrine, 0.09 ng/mL (typical value: <0.1 ng/mL); and norepinephrine, 0.28 ng/mL (normal range: 0.1–0.5 ng/mL). No hormones showed abnormal elevation. There were no signs of hyperglycemia or hypertension, and his medical and family histories revealed no significant findings.
Abdominal computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a well-defined, smoothly bordered left adrenal tumor measuring 3.3 × 2.3 cm. The tumor appeared as a soft tissue density on plain CT, with no evidence of calcification. On contrast-enhanced CT, it showed slight heterogeneous enhancement (Figure 1a). On T1-weighted MRI images, the tumor appeared iso-intense to skeletal muscle (Figure 1b). It was mildly hyperintense compared to skeletal muscle on T2-weighted images, with no signal loss on out-of-phase imaging. No findings suggested fat content. Contrast-enhanced MRI revealed uniform moderate enhancement. 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy showed no abnormal accumulation. Laparoscopic left adrenalectomy was subsequently performed.
Macroscopically, the extracted left adrenal specimen measured 6.5 × 3.8 × 2.5 cm and weighed 33 g. A well-defined, solid mass measuring 3.5 × 2.7 × 2.5 cm was noted in the adrenal medulla. The cut surface of the tumor appeared pale, resembling fish flesh, with some yellowish areas present (Figure 2a).
Microscopically, the tumor was well-demarcated from the uninvolved adrenal gland at low-power magnification and was encapsulated by a thin fibrous capsule (Figure 2b). The non-tumorous adrenal tissue showed abundant lipids with no signs of atrophy or other changes (Figure 2c).
Histologically, the tumor cells formed solid nests of varying sizes and irregular shapes, accompanied by a proliferation of collagen fibers in the stroma (Figure 2d). No glandular, ductal, or papillary structures, nor Zellballen patterns, were observed. Additionally, no rosette-like or fascicular arrangements were noted. The tumor cells showed indistinct cell boundaries and eosinophilic cytoplasm (Figure 2e). The nuclei were primarily round and uniform in size, but some displayed nuclear grooves. Cell density varied, revealing areas of high cellular density and focal nuclear stacking (Figure 2e). No pleomorphic nuclei or atypical multinucleated cells were identified. Mitoses were rare, with zero to one mitotic figure observed per 10 high-power fields. The stroma contained occasional clusters of foam cells (Figure 2f) and deposits of psammoma bodies (Figure 2g). Lymphoid follicle formation was also noted, characterized by the infiltration of small lymphocytes and plasma cells, with Russell bodies in some areas (Figure 2h). No hemorrhage or necrosis was detected.
Immunohistochemical analysis revealed that the tumor cells were positive for vimentin, S-100 protein, and CD56 (Figure 3). Approximately half of the tumor cells exhibited positivity for CD45 (LCA; B220; T200), whereas about 30% were positive for CD68 (KP-1). A few tumor cells were positive for EMA. In contrast, chromogranin A (CGA), synaptophysin, melanosome (HMB-45), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), TTF-1 (8G7G3/1), podoplanin (D2-40), CD20, CD3, CD79a, CD138, CD21, CD35, and keratin (AE1/AE3) showed negative results. The Ki-67 (MIB1) labeling index was 1.0%.
As previously reported [3], routine paraffin blocks were processed for ultrastructural observation, and an ultrastructural analysis was conducted. The tumor cells showed numerous spherical mitochondria, rough endoplasmic reticulum, and finger-like projections known as pseudomesaxons. A few desmosome-like structures were noted among the tumor cells. Neither chromaffin granules nor secretory granules were identified (Figure 4).
Based on these findings, the diagnosis of primary adrenal medullary sustentaculoma was made. As of 16 years post-surgery, after which time contact with the patient was lost, no recurrence or metastasis was observed. Whether the patient is still under outpatient follow-up is unknown.

3. Discussion

The sustentacular cells of the adrenal medulla are spindle-shaped or stellate cells that test positive for S-100 protein [1]. These cells originate from the neural crest, with a small number present in normal tissues [2], and support the chromaffin cells of the adrenal medulla and the chief cells of the paraganglia.
However, they cannot be identified in H&E-stained specimens, making S-100 protein immunostaining necessary for their identification [1,2]. In addition to S-100 protein, these cells also strongly express vimentin and CD56. A tumor indicating differentiation into adrenal-derived sustentacular cells, termed sustentaculoma, was reported by Lau et al. in 2006 [2].
Furthermore, sustentacular cells are recognized as components of tumors such as pheochromocytoma, neuroblastoma, ganglioneuroblastoma, and ganglioneuroma [2,4]. Differential diagnoses for sustentaculoma include pheochromocytoma and cellular schwannoma. Both sustentaculoma and pheochromocytoma are vimentin positive; however, sustentaculoma does not exhibit the Zellballen pattern. It is S-100 protein positive and CGA negative, and ultrastructurally, it presents pseudomesaxons while lacking chromaffin or secretory granules, thus distinguishing it from pheochromocytoma (Table 1).
CGA, chromogranin A; GFAP, glial fibrillary acidic protein.
Both sustentaculoma and cellular schwannoma are positive for S-100 protein, vimentin, and CD56 but negative for CGA. Pseudomesaxons are observed under electron microscopy. However, in sustentaculoma, the Antoni A-type tissue pattern found in schwannoma and the basal lamina formed between individual tumor cells are absent, distinguishing it from cellular schwannoma. Therefore, it is possible to histologically differentiate sustentaculoma from both pheochromocytoma and cellular schwannoma (Table 1).
Although extremely rare, the differential diagnosis also includes perineurioma. Adrenal primary perineurioma is an uncommon condition, first reported by Rampisela and Donner in 2009 [5]. It is distinguished by a distinctive yellow-brown cut surface color and the histological presence of elongated, spindle-shaped cells along with negative S-100 protein results on immunohistochemical staining. Furthermore, electron microscopy reveals numerous pinocytic vesicles, setting this case apart.
In the Lau et al. case [2], the tumor was CD45 negative. Furthermore, our investigation has revealed no reports of sustentacular cells being CD45 positive. However, approximately half of the tumor in the present case showed CD45 positivity. At this time, the significance of this positive finding remains unclear, and further accumulation of cases is necessary.
Ultrastructurally, numerous pseudomesaxons, or finger-like projections, were observed in the intertwined tumor cells. This finding was also reported in the Lau et al. study [2]. It is believed that this observation indicates that sustentaculoma shows Schwann cell-like differentiation. As the macroscopic, histological, immunohistochemical, and ultrastructural findings in the present patient closely resemble those reported by Lau et al. in 2006 [2], we thus believe these findings support the diagnosis of sustentaculoma.
This study has significant limitations as it is based on a single case report from one institution in Japan. Additional clinicopathological analyses, including multicenter studies, are necessary to clarify the etiology and pathophysiology of this rare condition. Making definitive statements about prognosis based solely on this case would be difficult. Reports from other countries, cultures, and institutions are anticipated.

4. Conclusions

We present a very rare case of primary adrenal medullary sustentaculoma. The tumor showed well-defined borders, and no cellular atypia indicative of malignancy was observed, and the Ki-67 labeling index was low. Furthermore, 16 years after surgery, no recurrence or metastasis has been noted. The CD45-positive finding in this case is unique as it is the first reported case in Japan and, to our knowledge, the second reported worldwide. Although further accumulation of cases is necessary, we believe it is highly likely that this is a benign tumor.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.T.; Validation, M.T. and S.F.; Investigation, M.T. and S.F.; Resources, M.T.; Data Curation, M.T.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, S.F.; Writing—Review and Editing, S.F.; Supervision, S.F.; Project Administration, M.T. and S.F. Both authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki (1975) and was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shimada General Medical Center (protocol code: R6-9; date of approval: March 19, 2025).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was not obtained from the patient included in this study because the surgery was performed 16 years ago, and he is no longer in contact with us.
Consent for Publication: Consent for publication was not obtained from the patient in this study because the surgery was performed 16 years ago, and we can no longer contact the patient.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Naoki Ooishi and Mizuki Naruse (Division of Pathology and Oral Pathology, Shimada General Medical Center, Shimada, Shizuoka, Japan) for helpful technical support with the immunohistochemical staining; Kohei Watanabe (Special Reference Laboratories, Hamura, Tokyo, Japan) for his skillful technical assistance with the electron microscopic examination; and Hiroko Tina Tajima (St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan) for kindly reviewing and editing the English manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
CT Computed tomography
MRI Magnetic resonance image
CGA Chromogranin A
GFAP Glial fibrillary acidic protein

References

  1. Carney, J.A. Adrenal. In: Histology for Pathologists, 5th ed.; Mills S.E., Ed.; Wolters Kluwer: Philadelphia, USA, 2020; pp. 1235–1242.
  2. Lau, S.K.; Romansky, S.G.; Weiss, L.M. Sustentaculoma report of a case of a distinctive neoplasm of the adrenal medulla. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2006, 30, 268–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Tsutsumi, Y. Electron microscopic study using formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded material, with special reference to observation of microbial organisms and endocrine granules. Acta Histochem. Cytochem. 2018, 51, 63–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Mete, O.; Asa, S.L.; Gill, A.J.; Kimura, N.; de Krijger, RR.; Tischler, A. Overview of the 2022 WHO Classification of Paragangliomas and Pheochromocytomas. Endocr. Pathol. 2022, 33, 90–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rampisela, D.; Donner, L.R. Perineurioma of the adrenal gland. Ultrastruct. Pathol. 2009, 33, 165–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Radiological findings. (a) Abdominal contrast-enhanced CT: The tumor appears slightly heterogeneous, presenting as a contrast-enhancing hypodense solid mass (arrowhead). (b) Abdominal T1-weighted MRI image: The tumor shows isointensity with skeletal muscle (arrowhead).
Figure 1. Radiological findings. (a) Abdominal contrast-enhanced CT: The tumor appears slightly heterogeneous, presenting as a contrast-enhancing hypodense solid mass (arrowhead). (b) Abdominal T1-weighted MRI image: The tumor shows isointensity with skeletal muscle (arrowhead).
Preprints 170710 g001
Figure 2. Macroscopic and microscopic findings: (a) Gross image of a split surface of an excised specimen. The tumor measures 3.5 × 2.7 × 2.5 cm, appears grayish-white with a fish-like texture, and is partly yellowish, bordered by the nonneoplastic adrenal gland. (b) Microscopically, the tumor is well-demarcated from the uninvolved adrenal gland and is encapsulated by a thin fibrous capsule (arrowheads) (×40, scale bar: 200 mm). (c) The non-tumorous adrenal tissue shows ample lipids without signs of atrophy or other changes (×40, scale bar: 200 mm). (d) Tumor cells proliferate to form solid nests of irregular sizes, accompanied by collagen fiberization of the stroma (×100, scale bar: 100 mm). (e) The tumor consists of cells with uniformly sized round nuclei, eosinophilic cytoplasm, and poorly defined cell borders (×1000, scale bar: 10 mm). (f) Clusters of foamy cells are observed in parts of the tumor (×100, scale bar: 100 mm). (g) Psammoma body deposits are present in some areas of the tumor (×200, scale bar: 50 mm). (h) Moderate lymphocytic and plasma cell infiltration and the formation of lymphoid follicles containing well-defined germinal centers are noted (×100, scale bar: 100 mm).
Figure 2. Macroscopic and microscopic findings: (a) Gross image of a split surface of an excised specimen. The tumor measures 3.5 × 2.7 × 2.5 cm, appears grayish-white with a fish-like texture, and is partly yellowish, bordered by the nonneoplastic adrenal gland. (b) Microscopically, the tumor is well-demarcated from the uninvolved adrenal gland and is encapsulated by a thin fibrous capsule (arrowheads) (×40, scale bar: 200 mm). (c) The non-tumorous adrenal tissue shows ample lipids without signs of atrophy or other changes (×40, scale bar: 200 mm). (d) Tumor cells proliferate to form solid nests of irregular sizes, accompanied by collagen fiberization of the stroma (×100, scale bar: 100 mm). (e) The tumor consists of cells with uniformly sized round nuclei, eosinophilic cytoplasm, and poorly defined cell borders (×1000, scale bar: 10 mm). (f) Clusters of foamy cells are observed in parts of the tumor (×100, scale bar: 100 mm). (g) Psammoma body deposits are present in some areas of the tumor (×200, scale bar: 50 mm). (h) Moderate lymphocytic and plasma cell infiltration and the formation of lymphoid follicles containing well-defined germinal centers are noted (×100, scale bar: 100 mm).
Preprints 170710 g002
Figure 3. Immunohistochemical findings. (a) Vimentin. (b) S-100 protein. (c) CD45. (d) CD56. (e) CGA. (f) synaptophysin.
Figure 3. Immunohistochemical findings. (a) Vimentin. (b) S-100 protein. (c) CD45. (d) CD56. (e) CGA. (f) synaptophysin.
Preprints 170710 g003
Figure 4. Electron microscopic findings. (a) Neoplastic cells display oval-shaped nuclei, and numerous spherical mitochondria are present in the cytoplasm. The cells are interconnected by protrusion-like structures known as pseudomesaxons. Neither chromaffin nor secretory granules are observed (scale bar: 2 µm). (b) The cells are intertwined, and desmosome-like structures are visible between the cells (arrowheads). A thin basal lamina (arrows) is faintly observed around some nests (scale bar: 0.5 µm).
Figure 4. Electron microscopic findings. (a) Neoplastic cells display oval-shaped nuclei, and numerous spherical mitochondria are present in the cytoplasm. The cells are interconnected by protrusion-like structures known as pseudomesaxons. Neither chromaffin nor secretory granules are observed (scale bar: 2 µm). (b) The cells are intertwined, and desmosome-like structures are visible between the cells (arrowheads). A thin basal lamina (arrows) is faintly observed around some nests (scale bar: 0.5 µm).
Preprints 170710 g004
Table 1. Histological differential diagnosis of primary adrenal medullary sustentaculoma, pheochromocytoma, and cellular schwannoma.
Table 1. Histological differential diagnosis of primary adrenal medullary sustentaculoma, pheochromocytoma, and cellular schwannoma.
Sustentaculoma Pheochromocytoma Schwannoma
Zellballen pattern - + -
Antoni type A - - +
Verocay bodies - - +
Vimentin + + +
S-100 protein + -a +
CGA - + -
CD56 + +/- +
Synaptophysin - + -
GFAP - - +/-
Chromaffin granules - + -
Pseudomesaxons + - +
Secretory granules - + -
Basal lamina - - +
a The sustentacular cells present in the tumor are positive for S-100 protein.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2026 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated