Preprint
Communication

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Topical Administration of a Mixed Microbial Culture of Lactobacillus paracasei, Pichia membranifaciens and Saccharomyces cerevisiae Significantly Inhibits the Development of Atopic Dermatitis in a Mouse Model Through IL-10 over Expression by Dendriti

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

07 July 2025

Posted:

07 July 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
Background/Objectives: In this study, we focused on a mixed microbial culture of Lacto-bacillus paracasei, Pichia membranifaciens and Saccharomyces cerevisiae (LS) as a new probiotic and examined the therapeutic and preventive effects of dermal treatment with LS in a mouse model of atopic dermatitis (AD). Methods: Immunomodulatory effects of LS were examined with murine dendritic cell lines (DC2.4) by measuring the interleukin (IL)-10 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) α levels. The anti-inflammatory effects of LS were evalu-ated in stimulated human epidermal keratinocytes (HaCaTs) by focusing on the produc-tion of IL-8 and thymus and activation-regulated chemokine (TARC). Therapeutic and preventive properties of topical treatment with LS (10%) were finally examined in a mouse model of AD developed by topical sensitization to house dust mite ointment. Clinical symptoms, back skin thickness, and transepidermal water loss (TEWL) were monitored weekly, and the immune responses in the auricular lymph nodes were analyzed after necropsy. Results: LS treatment significantly enhanced the secretions of IL-10 and TNFα by DC2.4 cells. IL-8 and TARC production by stimulated HaCaT cells was significantly decreased by co-culturing with LS. Although there were no significant changes in clinical symptoms, skin thickness, or TEWL in the therapeutic setting of AD mouse model, the number of IgE-positive B cells and IL-4 levels in the local lymph nodes significantly de-creased in the LS treatment group. Preventive treatment with LS significantly decreased AD symptoms compared to those in AD control mice. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that the immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory effects of LS prevent the development of AD.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

The close contribution of bacterial flora to the aggravation and amelioration of atopic dermatitis (AD) has been reported previously [1,2]. Therefore, oral treatment with probiotics has long been investigated as an effective alternative for preventing and ameliorating AD symptoms in humans and companion animals [3-5]. Lactobacillus paracasei (L. paracasei) is a representative probiotic that is effective against several types of allergic diseases, including AD, atopic eczema, asthma, and allergic rhinitis [6-9]. Expected impact of L. paracasei is also as an immune modulator, and previous studies have investigated that the oral treatment of L. paracasei exhibited the immunomodulatory effects in vivo and in vitro [10-12]. Dendritic cells (DCs) are one of the major targets of L. paracasei and are key players in acquiring and presenting antigen information on allergic symptoms [13]. Mileti et al. [14] demonstrated that L. paracasei minimally induced the release of cytokines, while it also inhibited the potential of DCs both to produce inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-12 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) α and to drive Th1 T cells in response to Salmonella. As shown in previous reports, the immunomodulatory effects of L. paracasei alone are not strong; therefore, herein, we focused on a mixed microbial culture of L. paracasei, Pichia membranifaciens (P. membranifaciens) and Saccharomyces cerevisiae (S. cerevisiae) (LS) as a new probiotic to ameliorate allergic diseases. In addition, most previous studies have highlighted oral exposure to these probiotics, whereas allergic inflammation occurs in local tissues such as the skin and respiratory system. Therefore, the objective of this study was to examine the therapeutic and preventive effects of dermal LS treatment in a mouse model of atopic dermatitis (AD). Immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory effects of LS were confirmed using dendritic cells and keratinocytes.

2. Materials and Methods

The LS culture was provided by Litanial Bio Science, Co. Ltd. (Hyogo, Japan) [15]. This culture was prepared by co-cultivation of L. paracasei, P. membranifaciens and S. cerevisiae in a rice grain broth supplemented with 5% dextrose at 30℃ for 24 h. Sterility was assessed by cultivating the microbial mixture on heart infusion (HI) agar (Nissui Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory effects of LS were examined in vitro using murine dendritic cell lines (DC2.4) and a human epidermal keratinocyte cell line (HaCaT). DC2.4 was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA) and was cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation, Osaka, Japan) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS; Sigma-Aldrich Co. LLC., Tokyo, Japan) and penicillin-streptomycin (FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation). HaCaT cells were obtained from CLS (Cell Lines Service) GmbH (Eppelheim, Germany) and cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation) supplemented with 10 % FCS and penicillin-streptomycin. DC2.4 cells (1 × 104 cells/100 μL) at 70% confluency were seeded in a 96-well culture plate and exposed to several concentrations of LS (0, 0.125, 0.25, 0.5 and 1 mg/mL). The concentrations of IL-10 and TNFα in the supernatants were quantified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (DuoSet ELISA kit, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA). HaCaT cells (1 × 104 cells) were seeded in 100 μL of the medium at 70 % confluence in 96-well culture plates and stimulated with recombinant human TNFα and interferon (IFN) γ (PeproTech, Inc., Cranbury, NJ) for 1 h; next, 100 μL of several concentrations of LS (0, 0.125, 0.25, 0.5 and 1 mg/mL) in culture medium was added followed by incubation for 24 h. The concentrations of IL-8 and thymus activation-regulated chemokine (TARC) in the supernatants were quantified by ELISA. The therapeutic and preventive properties of topical LS treatment were examined in a mouse model of AD. The AD mouse model was generated by topical sensitization with Biostir AD (Dermatophagoides farinae extract) in addition to the topical application of 4% sodium dodecyl sulfate solution (FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation) in NC/Nga mice according to previous report [16]. The treatment regimen involved daily topical application (0.1 mL/mouse) of 10% of LS solution (n = 8) or DW vehicle (n = 7). Treatment was initiated on day 19 after the development of AD, when the mean AD score was 2.07. Trans epidermal water loss (TEWL), back skin thicknesses, and clinical scores were monitored once weekly during the experimental period. TEWL was measured using a VAPO SCAN (AS-VT100RS, ASCH JAPAN Co., LTD, Tokyo, Japan), and a clinical score of 0–4 was assigned as follows: no symptoms, 0; mild, 1; moderate, 2; severe, 3; and extreme, 4 for the ear and back, as previously described [17]. Auricular lymph node (LN) samples were collected from each mouse 1 d after the final sensitization. Single-cell suspensions isolated from the LN were prepared as described previously [18,19], and the total number of cells was counted using a CellDrop™ Cell Counting System (DeNovix Inc., DE, USA). The cells were analyzed using a BD FACSAria™ III cell sorter (BD Biosciences, Tokyo, Japan) with monoclonal antibodies (PE/Cyanine7-conjugated anti-mouse CD3, PE-conjugated anti-mouse CD4, PE-conjugated anti-mouse CD11b, APC-conjugated anti-mouse CD11c, PerCP/Cyanine5.5-conjugated anti-mouse CD19, APC-conjugated anti-mouse CD44, APC/Cyanine7-conjugated anti-mouse CD62L, FITC-conjugated anti-mouse IgE, FITC-conjugated anti-mouse MHC class II, and DAPI) (BioLegend Inc., CA, USA; Miltenyi Biotec K.K. and Sony Biotechnology Inc., Tokyo, Japan). Single-cell suspensions of LNs were used to evaluate cytokine release by T cells. Single-cell suspensions of LNs (5 × 105 cells/well) were incubated with mouse T-activator CD3/CD28 dynabeads (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Kanagawa, Japan) for 24 h. The levels of interferon (IFN) γ, IL-4, IL-13, and IL-17 in the supernatant were evaluated using ELISA (DuoSet ELISA kit, R&D Systems). Semi-quantitative histopathological evaluation of a portion of the skin sample was performed in a blinded fashion using the following grading system: 0, within normal limits; 1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, severe. The total lesion score was used for the statistical evaluation. Data are expressed as mean ± 1 standard error of the mean (SEM). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test were used to evaluate the results of the in vitro studies. In vivo experiments, 2-way ANOVA followed by Šídák's multiple comparisons test or Student's t-test was used to test the significance of differences between the two groups. Statistical significance was estimated at 5 % levels of probability, and data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 10 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).

3. Results

LS treatment significantly enhanced the secretions of IL-10 and TNFα by DC2.4 cells (Figure 1A and B). In contrast, IL-8 and TARC production by stimulated HaCaT cells was significantly decreased by co-culturing with LS (Figure 1C and D). Although there were no significant changes in clinical symptoms, skin thickness, and TEWL in the therapeutic setting of the AD mouse model (Figure 2A-D), histological evaluations, including hyperplasia in the keratinized layer and crust in the epidermis, were significantly ameliorated by LS treatment (Table 1, Figure 2E). Allergy-related immune reactions, including the number of IgE-positive B cells and IL-4 levels in the local lymph nodes, also significantly decreased in the LS treatment group (Figure 2F-K). The effects of LS were highlighted more in preventive treatment. LS treatment significantly decreased AD symptoms (Figure 3A and D) and histological findings (Table 1, Figure 3E), whereas skin thickness and TEWL were unaffected (Figure 3B and C). Effector T cells and IL-13 levels in the LN in the LS treatment group were significantly reduced compared to those in AD control mice (Figure 3F-K).

4. Discussion

P. membranifaciens and S. cerevisiae have been increasingly recognized for their immunomodulatory potential, such as IL-6 production by dendritic cells (Yee et al., 2024). In contrast, only a modest increase in IL-10, apivotal player in immunomodulation (Asgari et al., 2025), was observed after S. cerevisiae treatment. A previous study reported that oral administration of LS significantly increased protection against atypical Aeromonas salmonicida infection in the common carp, indicating that P. membranifaciens and S. cerevisiae may play a role as a prebiotic for L. paracasei (Kodama et al., 2011). In fact, our findings indicating significant upregulation of IL-10 and TNFα by LS treatment demonstrate the potential of LS as an immune modulator. Significant immunomodulatory effects were also observed in the therapeutic setting of the AD mouse model, whereas no influence was observed on the clinical signs and cutaneous inflammation. However, the preventive use of LS topical treatments significantly ameliorated the AD score compared to that in the vehicle control group, in addition to the immune modulation seen in effector T cell infiltration and IL-13 levels in local LN. Our findings indicated that the immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory effects of LS can prevent AD development in humans and companion animals.

Author Contributions

For research articles with several authors, a short paragraph specifying their individual contributions must be provided. The following statements should be used “Conceptualization, M.K., C.O., and T.F.; methodology, M.K., C.O., T.M., A.H., Y.I., and T.F.; software, M.K., C.O., and T.F.; validation, M.K., C.O., and T.F.; formal analysis, M.K., C.O., and T.F.; investigation, M.K., C.O., and T.F.; resources, H.T..; data curation, M.K., C.O., and T.F.; writing—original draft preparation, M.K., C.O., and T.F. project administration, .T.F.; funding acquisition, T.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Litanial Bioscience Laboratory, 2-26 Shinobe-Kitamachi, Befu-cho, Kakogawa, Hyogo 675-0121, Japan

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Azabu University (protocol code 240620-1 and June, 20, 2024).” for studies involving animals.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions of this study are included in this article. Further inquiries can be di-rected to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.jp) for the English language editing.

Conflicts of Interest

Hideo Togase directed the Litanial Bioscience Laboratory. The remaining authors declare no potential conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
AD Atopic dermatitis
ANOVA Analysis of variance
DCs Dendritic cells
FCS Fetal calf serum
HaCaT Human epidermal keratinocytes
IFN Interferon
Ig Immunoglobulin
IL Interleukin
LN Lymph nodes
LS Mixed microbial culture of Lactobacillus paracasei, Pichia membranifaciens and Saccharomyces cerevisiae
SEM Standard error of the mean
TARC Thymus and activation-regulated chemokine
TEWL Transepidermal water loss
TNF Tumor necrosis factor

References

  1. Li, W.; Li, A. Exploring the causal relationship between gut microbiota and atopic dermatitis: A Mendelian randomization study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2024, 103, e40193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wang, F.; Wang, Z.; Qu, L. The changes of intestinal flora and metabolites in atopic dermatitis mice. Front Microbiol 2024, 15, 1462491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Thomsen, M.; Kunstner, A.; Wohlers, I.; Olbrich, M.; Lenfers, T.; Osumi, T.; Shimazaki, Y.; Nishifuji, K.; Ibrahim, S.M.; Watson, A.; et al. A comprehensive analysis of gut and skin microbiota in canine atopic dermatitis in Shiba Inu dogs. Microbiome 2023, 11, 232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wang, L.; Xu, L. The impact of prebiotics, probiotics and synbiotics on the prevention and treatment of atopic dermatitis in children: an umbrella meta-analysis. Front Pediatr 2025, 13, 1498965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Xi, Z.; Fenglin, X.; Yun, Z.; Chunrong, L. Efficacy of probiotics in the treatment of allergic diseases: a meta-analysis. Front Nutr 2025, 12, 1502390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Husein-ElAhmed, H.; Steinhoff, M. Meta-analysis on preventive and therapeutic effects of probiotic supplementation in infant atopic dermatitis. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2023, 21, 833–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Puisto, R.; Gomez-Gallego, C.; Collado, M.C.; Turta, O.; Isolauri, E.; Rautava, S. The Role of Infant Gut Microbiota Modulation by Perinatal Maternal Probiotic Intervention in Atopic Eczema Risk Reduction. Neonatology 2025, 122, 84–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Sim, S.; Park, H.J.; Kim, Y.K.; Choi, Y.; Park, H.S. Lactobacillus paracasei-derived extracellular vesicles alleviate neutrophilic asthma by inhibiting the JNK pathway in airway epithelium. Allergol Int 2024, 73, 302–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Zhou, X.; Song, X.; Shu, T.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, Z.; Hu, C.; Pan, J.; Dai, X.; Hao, H.; Xiao, G.; et al. Prevention and alleviation of allergic rhinitis by oral administration of Lacticaseibacillus paracasei GOLDGUT-Lpc969. Front Immunol 2024, 15, 1444778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Li, Y.; Aoki, T.; Iwabuchi, S.; Arai, S.; Iwabuchi, N.; Motobayashi, H.; Tanaka, M.; Hashimoto, S. Immunomodulatory activity of heat-killed Lacticaseibacillus paracaseiMCC1849 based on the activation of plasmacytoid dendritic cells in the peripheral blood of healthy adults. Food Sci Nutr 2024, 12, 3452–3460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Kato, K.; Arai, S.; Sato, S.; Iwabuchi, N.; Takara, T.; Tanaka, M. Effects of Heat-Killed Lacticaseibacillus paracasei MCC1849 on Immune Parameters in Healthy Adults-A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study. Nutrients 2024, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Naito, T.; Morikawa, M.; Yamamoto-Fujimura, M.; Iwata, A.; Maki, A.; Kato-Nagaoka, N.; Oana, K.; Kiyoshima-Shibata, J.; Matsuura, Y.; Kaji, R.; et al. Diverse impact of a probiotic strain, Lacticaseibacillus paracasei Shirota, on peripheral mononuclear phagocytic cells in healthy Japanese office workers: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Biosci Microbiota Food Health 2023, 42, 65–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wiese-Szadkowska, M.; Helmin-Basa, A.; Eljaszewicz, A.; Gackowska, L.; Januszewska, M.; Motyl, I.; Andryszczyk, M.; Wieczynska, J.; Michalkiewicz, J. Selected commensal bacteria change profiles of Helicobacter pylori-induced T cells via dendritic cell modulation. Helicobacter 2019, 24, e12614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Mileti, E.; Matteoli, G.; Iliev, I.D.; Rescigno, M. Comparison of the immunomodulatory properties of three probiotic strains of Lactobacilli using complex culture systems: prediction for in vivo efficacy. PLoS One 2009, 4, e7056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Influence of LS treatment on cytokine secretion by dendritic cells and epidermal keratinocytes. LS treatment significantly enhanced the production of (A) IL-10 and (B) TNFα in murine dendritic cell line (DC2.4). In contrast, (C) IL-8 and (D) TARC secretion by TNFα/IFNγ-stimulated human epidermal keratinocyte cell line (HaCaT) were significantly inhibited by LS treatment in a dose-dependent manner. Each result is presented as the mean (pg/mL) ± 1 SEM. n = 7 per group. p < 0.05 (Dunnett’s multiple comparison test) vs. the control group. IFN, interferon; IL, interleukin; L. paracasei, Lactobacillus paracasei; S. cerevisiae, Saccharomyces cerevisiae; TARC, thymus activation-regulated chemokine; TNF, tumor necrosis factor.
Figure 1. Influence of LS treatment on cytokine secretion by dendritic cells and epidermal keratinocytes. LS treatment significantly enhanced the production of (A) IL-10 and (B) TNFα in murine dendritic cell line (DC2.4). In contrast, (C) IL-8 and (D) TARC secretion by TNFα/IFNγ-stimulated human epidermal keratinocyte cell line (HaCaT) were significantly inhibited by LS treatment in a dose-dependent manner. Each result is presented as the mean (pg/mL) ± 1 SEM. n = 7 per group. p < 0.05 (Dunnett’s multiple comparison test) vs. the control group. IFN, interferon; IL, interleukin; L. paracasei, Lactobacillus paracasei; S. cerevisiae, Saccharomyces cerevisiae; TARC, thymus activation-regulated chemokine; TNF, tumor necrosis factor.
Preprints 166893 g001
Figure 2. Topical treatment of LS significantly influenced the immune responses in a therapeutic setting of AD mouse model. In the therapeutic setting of AD, topical LS treatment did not influence the (A) AD score, (B) skin thickness, and (C) TEWL compared to the AD control group. (D) Representative image of the skin and (E) histological image of the affected skin in each group (Bar = 100 µm). Topical applications of LS significantly decreased the number of (F) CD3+CD4+CD44+CD62L- effector T cells and (G) CD19+IgE+ B cells However, there was no change in the number of (H) CD11c+ DCs in the auricular LN. (I) IL-4 levels were also significantly decreased by LS treatment; however, there were no changes in (J) IL-13 and (K) IL-17 levels in auricular LN. Each result is presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). n = 1 (untreated), 6 (AD control), and 7 (LS treatment) per group. p < 0.05 (Student's t-test) vs. AD control group. AD, atopic dermatitis; TEWL, transepidermal water loss.
Figure 2. Topical treatment of LS significantly influenced the immune responses in a therapeutic setting of AD mouse model. In the therapeutic setting of AD, topical LS treatment did not influence the (A) AD score, (B) skin thickness, and (C) TEWL compared to the AD control group. (D) Representative image of the skin and (E) histological image of the affected skin in each group (Bar = 100 µm). Topical applications of LS significantly decreased the number of (F) CD3+CD4+CD44+CD62L- effector T cells and (G) CD19+IgE+ B cells However, there was no change in the number of (H) CD11c+ DCs in the auricular LN. (I) IL-4 levels were also significantly decreased by LS treatment; however, there were no changes in (J) IL-13 and (K) IL-17 levels in auricular LN. Each result is presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). n = 1 (untreated), 6 (AD control), and 7 (LS treatment) per group. p < 0.05 (Student's t-test) vs. AD control group. AD, atopic dermatitis; TEWL, transepidermal water loss.
Preprints 166893 g002
Figure 3. Topical treatment of LS significantly inhibited the development of AD symptoms in a preventive setting of AD mouse model. In a preventive setting of AD, topical LS treatment significantly inhibited the development of the (A) AD score; however, there was no change in (B) skin thickness and (C) TEWL compared to that in the AD control group. (D) Representative image of the skin and (E) histological image of the affected skin in each group (Bar = 100 µm). The topical application of LS significantly decreased the number of (F) CD3+CD4+CD44+CD62L- effector T cells; however, there was no change in the number of (G) CD19+IgE+ B cells or(H) CD11c+ DCs in the auricular LN. (J) IL-4 levels were significantly decreased by LS treatment; however, there was no change in (I) IL-4 and (K) IL-17 levels in the auricular LN. Each result is presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). n = 1 (untreated), 6 (AD control), and 7 (LS treatment) per group. p < 0.05 (Student's t-test) vs. AD control group.
Figure 3. Topical treatment of LS significantly inhibited the development of AD symptoms in a preventive setting of AD mouse model. In a preventive setting of AD, topical LS treatment significantly inhibited the development of the (A) AD score; however, there was no change in (B) skin thickness and (C) TEWL compared to that in the AD control group. (D) Representative image of the skin and (E) histological image of the affected skin in each group (Bar = 100 µm). The topical application of LS significantly decreased the number of (F) CD3+CD4+CD44+CD62L- effector T cells; however, there was no change in the number of (G) CD19+IgE+ B cells or(H) CD11c+ DCs in the auricular LN. (J) IL-4 levels were significantly decreased by LS treatment; however, there was no change in (I) IL-4 and (K) IL-17 levels in the auricular LN. Each result is presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). n = 1 (untreated), 6 (AD control), and 7 (LS treatment) per group. p < 0.05 (Student's t-test) vs. AD control group.
Preprints 166893 g003
Table 1. Histological evaluation of back skin of a mouse model of atopic dermatitis.
Table 1. Histological evaluation of back skin of a mouse model of atopic dermatitis.
Untreated (n = 1) AD control (n = 7) L. paracasei and
S. cereviciae (n = 8)
Therapeutic setting
 Epidermis
  Parakeratosis 0.00 ± 0.00 1.00 ± 0.00 0.75 ± 0.16
  Hyperplasia in keratinized layer 0.00 ± 0.00 2.43 ± 0.20 1.75 ± 0.14 P = 0.0205
  Crust 0.00 ± 0.00 2.29 ± 0.29 0.75 ± 0.16 P = 0.0003
  Hyperplasia in non-keratinized layer 0.00 ± 0.00 2.14 ± 0.14 2.00 ± 0.00
  Ulcer 0.00 ± 0.00 0.86 ± 0.34 0.50 ± 0.19
 Dermis
  Inflammatory cell infiltration 0.00 ± 0.00 2.86 ± 0.14 2.13 ± 0.40
Preventive setting
 Epidermis
  Parakeratosis 0.00 ± 0.00 1.29 ± 0.18 0.63 ± 0.26
  Hyperplasia in keratinized layer 0.00 ± 0.00 1.86 ± 0.26 0.88 ± 0.23 P = 0.0135
  Crust 0.00 ± 0.00 2.14 ± 0.26 0.63 ± 0.38 P = 0.0066
  Hyperplasia in non-keratinized layer 0.00 ± 0.00 2.00 ± 0.00 1.88 ± 0.13
  Ulcer 0.00 ± 0.00 1.00 ± 0.31 0.25 ± 0.25
 Dermis
  Inflammatory cell infiltration 0.00 ± 0.00 3.00 ± 0.00 1.00 ± 0.38 P = 0.0003
A histological score (0, within normal limits; 1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, severe) was assigned to each observation. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. p < 0.05 (unpaired t-test) compared to the AD control group.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2026 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated