Will not directly change the potential at either electrode nor consume (adsorbed) SCN- to an extent that there are no more bridges to chitin. However, a second addition of KSCN will rise the voltage from 416 to 650 mV immediately and two min later even to 743 mV.
Replacing Purified Chitin with “Complete” Arthropods
For La at least, it could be shown that the final potentials (voltages) are the same whether one takes purified chitin or dried Daphnia, and effects of adding ligands, their precursors, and iodate are similar, too. Hence e.g., polyphenols will not interfere with M ion interaction for REEs at least; it is likely different for Fe, V (caffeic acid was applied with a V metal/chitin-electrode array), actinoids and some other elements. Given that native chitin from aquatic arthropods consists of sizable shares of all proteins, polyphenols, different metal carbonates (Ca, Zn, and others) fortifying the material and sometimes other components which may or may not interact with adsorbed metal ions to further decrease their activity, it is important to compare purified chitin to authentic (just dried) arthropods or lichens, respectively with respect to potential changes at some electrode. Both the pure-chitin- and the dried-Daphnia covered Ga_In; Ce, La, Fe electrodes produced a voltage of about 170 mV with no additives over La(IO3)3.
Data on Ga/In fractionation depending on the presence of yet other metals, ligands are given in the following
Table 2:
In photoredox systems Eu is taken up by chitin next to a metal electrode to grossly varying amounts: very little with V (the initially green [V(III)] solution turns blue during the process even though there is V metal; possible photooxidation of ligand caffeic acid), comparable amounts with Al or Pb (nine or 5.5 µmols/g), and much more with Ni which taints the chitin dark-olive to black (13.5 µmol/g Eu, almost 24 µmol/g Ni [a rather low saturation value]).
The activity of La in the alloy [
17] is further decreased by adding proteases. Although neither glycine [
18] nor SCN
- [
20] do form particularly stable complexes with La or Ce, they apparently provide a kind of bridge between the adsorbed metal ion and chitin. Thus, the effective activity of the metal ion on chitin will decrease even further unless the bridging species is removed by oxidation some time afterwards (SCN
- by iodate [
24], glycine by Ce(IV) [
36] or air/Co
2+); only then the voltage which can be well larger than 500 mV will decrease again. Thus, it can be anticipated that SCN
- from other sources, like reduction of (SCN)
2 or photolysis (LF bands [
37]) of ions like reineckate cis-[Cr(NCS)
4(NH
3)
2]
- will also produce a similarly strong signal.
Previous studies [
21] had shown that polyphenol (-derivatives) caffeic and ferulic acids will hardly influence REE metal ion adsorption to purified chitin (fractionated uptake from mixed Ce/Sm- and Ce/Gd oxides, La/Sr/Co ferrite). Carbonate ions acting as a potent complexing agent for Ga, In, REEs ≠ Y, Yb, Lu [
13,
28,
29] in fact do change the electrochemical signals associated with In, Ce, or La next to chitin. In (or Pb) embedded into chitin flakes may be pushed to so low potentials that reduction of CO
2 or HCO
3- - of course also influencing the current flow – becomes feasible [
30]. This holds the more if Ga_In contains electropositive metals, forming bridging species such as glycine (with added nitrate) or dicarboxylates oxalate, malonate, especially when SCN
- was added to the bridging solution besides of Al, REEs. In contrast polyphenols from outside (aq. phase) will not change chitin performance [
22]. Things are different with metals forming very stable polyphenol complexes like vanadium. The redox reaction between (solid lanthanum- or cerium) iodate and thiocyanate (both salts of strong acids) [
24,
25] will produce hydroxide or cyanide ions after turnover, and La, Ce hydroxides are way less soluble than the iodates. This could be the reason for parts of the increase of voltage. Native chitin and daphnia behave almost identical, again differing from the findings with crayfish [
4,
38,
39].
There is considerable recent literature discussing both semiconductor properties (band gap about 4 eV, type of conduction not specified) and non-linear optical features of REE triiodates [
41] or mixed iodate-fluorides. The size of the bandgap argues against simple transistor property but it is not clear whether redox processes at the surface of the iodate would make the band-gap much smaller. In addition, chitin is well-known to behave as a semiconductor itself [
9], probably related to its photo- and thermoelectric properties [
10] if it also contains xanthopterin and to the electric response to changes of salt concentration or pH in the surrounding waters. Even though, the similarity of the setup to a metal(-oxide film)/SC/SC device, namely, a transistor (
Figure 9) is striking and intriguing.
The voltage in-between the electrodes (bare and chitin-covered) is much smaller than the band gap of a typical REE iodate (note that sizable crystals do form) [
40] which precludes the systems from acting as a real transistor even after adding some reductant to the region where there is solid REE iodate connecting the electrodes. In the latter case, the original 170 mV for REE = La (much less for Ce) increase to ≥ 550 mV (as compared to some 260 – 300 mV when only papaya is applied and almost zero after extended enzymatic proteolysis), meaning the potential of the chitin-/Daphnia-covered electrode (both behave very similarly) gets considerably lower than that of
or
which both can be calculated from the known (tiny) activity of La saturated in cold (RT) Ga_In [
17] and the known solubility product of La iodate [
22].
REE iodates are reported to cause protein degradation and corresponding activities against both bacteria and hulled viruses [
41], while glutathione is implied in iodate reduction in vertebrates. Yet, it is feasible to produce sizable voltage excursions. The known [
42] potential oscillations in the scn-/solid In system are negligibly small (few mV) and occur only upon anodic forcing.
Using the data by Budelmann (2021) [
8], one can estimate from the behavior of metals on chitin in a) water and b) sediment (two different flooded lignite open pits without appreciable inflow, one clay pit) whether some depletion on chitin put into sediment, and thus delivery/transport of elements from water into sediment (left part of
Figure 11) is realistic (
Table 3):
As a result, animal activity will enrich water with Mxy+ from sediment, not vice versa, except for few cases. There are ecological consequences.
Ecological meaning of the measurements
Retschke (2016) [
3] and Fränzle et al. (2019) [
4] could show that biogeochemical activity in the sediment related to some metal (e.g., Ni associated with methanogenesis) brings about and can be determined an increased factor F, allowing to “look” deep into the sediment by means of pairs of chitin flakes located next to each other in water and directly underneath sediment. This effect was corroborated by lab experiments showing the behavior of Mo on chitin [
45] when there are nitrate-reducing bacteria in sediment and glucose, nitrate in water [
34]. Nitrate reductases can also reduce iodate [
34]. The increased F value due to biogeochemical activity would produce another (different) electrochemical signal. Judging from preliminary results, there is no substantial difference between purified chitin (originally obtained from Arctic shrimp
Pandalus borealis; Sigma-Aldrich) and actual organisms which might be arranged as follows (
Figure 11):
Around some multielectrode system in a cage (top) or spontaneously gather there for food or light (below), providing the chitin cover of one electrode (Figure above)
This can be addressed simply by comparing electrochemical data from pure chitin to those obtained samples of dried arthropods or lichens, that is, replacing the purified chitin in the mesh bag around some electrode by (dead) arthropods. However, then you do introduce some other compounds into the setup, including proteins or peptides.
Thus, muscle activity or simple erosion give rise to the following transport processes causing secondary biochemical activity next to the water/sediment interface (
Figure 13):
There are sizable differences between metal ion adsorption in/on loamy sediments and soft, organic-rich ones while arthropods are known to approach even the most remote sites of partly inundated caves like Krubera/Voronya cave (Abkhazia/Georgia, > 2100 m deep from entrance, with springtails living at farthest dry points from surface entrance) [
46] and display a very peculiar social behavior next to hydrothermal springs in deep ocean [
38] which presumably causes both exchange and horizontal transport of metal ions. In fact, arthropods outcompete all other animals save nematodes in the harshest and most remote [
46,
47] cave biotope conditions, indicating that these animals might once again benefit from the adsorption of metal ions on chitin.
REE contents of phyto- and zooplankton use to be low with respect to soil, also when compared to levels in local waters while benthic organisms accumulate REEs in chitin, as does purified chitin [
8,
43,
44]. Thus, detritus and organic-rich sediments formed from this and bacteria will be very low in REEs. In stark contrast, erosion of ”normal” sediments in some creek or river or leaching of lignite causes an input of high-REE matter (at least insofar as La, Ce, Y, and Nd are concerned, to lesser amounts also Pr, Sm, Yb and in some cases which need further discussion also Eu) and thus the total levels in sediment should much higher. Both Irmer´s Pond and Lake Olbersdorf formed fairly recently (former lignite open pits flooded during 1990s), are distinguished by being almost closed water volumes (i.e., evaporation/hypogeic inflow >> in- and outflow by surface creeks), and with very little contribution of possibly eroded materials. Accordingly, the REE levels in sediment may even be lower than those in water (cp. [
8]). Yet, the behavior of electrodes covered with chitin does prove that corresponding metal contents do vary and realistic water levels bring about a sizable electrochemical signal. They strongly depend on redox, photoredox behavior of REEs, other metals while Eu(III)/organic H photodonor/hν does not alter the measured the voltage. Here, analytics and electrochemistry produce different pieces of information.
The indium metal/SCN
--system does display potential oscillations on its own if exposed to rather negative potentials at a hanging-drop mercury electrode and high [SCN
-] (5 M/l) [
43]. The potential amplitude is a few mV at an outer potential of – 0.95 V. There are indications for similar reactions in the full-scale system while indium itself and Ga_In without electropositive additions show severe corrosion when embedded by chitin [
5]. Neither would obscure the signals seen with chitin.