Submitted:
19 March 2025
Posted:
20 March 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
4.1. Pathophysiological Mechanisms Affecting Bowel Preparation in Diabetic Patients
4.2. Impact of Antihyperglycemic Medications on Bowel Preparation
- Metformin should be discontinued upon initiation of a clear liquid diet due to its association with lactic acidosis risk [37].
- GLP-1 receptor agonists, which delay gastric emptying, should be withheld if a once-weekly dose is scheduled within two days before colonoscopy. This class of medications may exacerbate delayed bowel transit and contribute to inadequate cleansing [38].
- DPP-4 inhibitors should be omitted on the morning of the procedure, as they have minimal risk of hypoglycemia but may still interact with fasting metabolism [39].
- SGLT-2 inhibitors should be stopped three days before colonoscopy to reduce the risk of dehydration and euglycemic ketoacidosis [40].
- Insulin therapy should be carefully adjusted, with dose reductions or omissions as appropriate, to prevent hypoglycemia during fasting [34].
4.3. Clinical Implications of Inadequate Bowel Preparation
4.4. The Burden of Diabetes and Colorectal Cancer
4.5. The Need for Standardized and Evidence-Based Guidelines
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Sharma, P.; Burke, C.A.; Johnson, D.A.; Cash, B.D. The importance of colonoscopy bowel preparation for the detection of colorectal lesions and colorectal cancer prevention. Endosc Int Open. 2020 May;8(5):E673-E683. Epub 2020 Apr 17. PMID: 32355887; PMCID: PMC7165013. [CrossRef]
- Shahini, E.; Sinagra, E.; Vitello, A.; Ranaldo, R.; Contaldo, A.; Facciorusso, A.; Maida, M. Factors affecting the quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy in hard-to-prepare patients: Evidence from the literature. World J Gastroenterol. 2023 Mar 21;29(11):1685-1707. PMID: 37077514; PMCID: PMC10107216. [CrossRef]
- Zha, S.; Wang, S.; Pan, P.; Xia, T., Chang, X.; Yang, X.; Guo, L.; Meng, Q., Yang, F.; Qian, W. et al. Magnitude, Risk Factors, and Factors Associated With Adenoma Miss Rate of Tandem Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2019 May;156(6):1661-1674.e11. Epub 2019 Feb 6. PMID: 30738046. [CrossRef]
- Lai, E.J.; Calderwood, A.H.; Doros, G.; Fix, O.K.; Jacobson, B.C. The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Mar;69(3 Pt 2):620-5. Epub 2009 Jan 10. PMID: 19136102; PMCID: PMC2763922. [CrossRef]
- https://idf.org/about-diabetes/diabetes-facts-figures/.
- Bray, F.; Ferlay, J.; Soerjomataram, I.; Siegel, R.L.; Torre, L.A.; Jemal, A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424. Epub 2018 Sep 12. Erratum in: CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Jul;70(4):313. doi: 10.3322/caac.21609. PMID: 30207593. [CrossRef]
- Abu-Freha, N.; Yitzhak, A.; Shirin, H.; Nevo-Shor, A.; Abu-Jaffar, J.; Abu-Rafe, S.; Afianish, Y.; Cohen, D.L.; Bermont, A. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists significantly affect the quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Endoscopy. 2025 Feb;57(2):126-133. Epub 2024 Oct 10. PMID: 39389565. [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Wang, L.; Wu, W.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, M.; She, W.; Cheng, Q.; Chen, N.; Fan, P.; Du, Y. et al. Predictors of inadequate bowel preparation in older patients undergoing colonoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2024 Jan;149:104631. Epub 2023 Oct 28. PMID: 37963423. [CrossRef]
- Adamek, H.E.; Bergmann, L.; Müssig K. Koloskopievorbereitung bei Patienten mit Diabetes mellitus: Entwicklung einer Handlungsempfehlung [Bowel preparation in patients with Diabetes mellitus: Development of a procedure model]. Z Gastroenterol. 2022 May;60(5):784-789. German. Epub 2022 May 11. PMID: 35545113. [CrossRef]
- Zhao, M., Xu, Y.; Zhu, H.; Chen, J.; Sun, W.; Yang, D.; Peng, H. A prospective cohort study of the relationship between the withdrawal time and the detection rate of colorectal adenoma. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2022 Sep;57(9):1131-1137. Epub 2022 Apr 24. PMID: 35465795. [CrossRef]
- Lewandowski, K.; Rydzewska, G.; Ledwoń, T.K. Preparation for endoscopic examinations in patients with diabetes and hypoglycaemia. Prz Gastroenterol. 2021;16(4):297-305. Epub 2021 Dec 19. PMID: 34976236; PMCID: PMC8690955. [CrossRef]
- Agha, O.Q.; Alsayid, M.; Brown, M.D. Bowel preparation in diabetic patients undergoing colonoscopy. Ann Gastroenterol. 2021;34(3):310-315. Epub 2021 Feb 26. PMID: 33948054; PMCID: PMC8079869. [CrossRef]
- Ruiz, R.; Jukemura, J.; Alves, P.R.A.; Santos, M.E.L.D. Evaluation of pH and residual gastric volume after colon preparation with mannitol: prospective randomized study comparing procedure performed after 3 hours versus 6 hours. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2020 Nov 11;75:e1847. PMID: 33206752; PMCID: PMC7603285. [CrossRef]
- Fuccio, L.; Frazzoni, .; Spada, C.; Mussetto, A.; Fabbri, C.; Manno,M.; Aragona, G.; Zagari, R.M.; Rondonotti, E.; Manes, G. et al; QIPS study group. Factors That Affect Adequacy of Colon Cleansing for Colonoscopy in Hospitalized Patients. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Feb;19(2):339-348.e7. Epub 2020 Mar 18. PMID: 32200083. [CrossRef]
- Hochberg, I.; Segol, O.; Shental, R.; Shimoni, P.; Eldor R. Antihyperglycemic therapy during colonoscopy preparation: A review and suggestions for practical recommendations. United European Gastroenterol J. 2019 Jul;7(6):735-740.
- Megna, B.; Weiss, J.; Ley, D.; Saha, S.; Pfau, P.; Grimes, I.; Li, Z.; Caldera, F. Clear liquid diet before bowel preparation predicts successful chromoendoscopy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Feb;89(2):373-379.e2. Epub 2018 Oct 16. PMID: 30339950.40619846365. Epub 2019 Apr 20. PMID: 31316777; PMCID: PMC6620874. [CrossRef]
- Mahmood, S.; Farooqui, S.M.; Madhoun, M.F. Predictors of inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Aug;30(8):819-826. PMID: 29847488. [CrossRef]
- Anklesaria, A..; Ivanina, E.A.; Chudy-Onwugaje, K.O.; Tin, K.; Levine, C.M.; Homel, P.; Rojas, M.; Mayer, I.; Rahmani, R. The Effect of Obesity on the Quality of Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy: Results From a Large Observational Study. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2019 Jul;53(6):e214-e220. PMID: 29738352. [CrossRef]
- Mandolesi, D.; Frazzoni, L.; Bazzoli, F.; Fuccio, L. The management of 'hard-to-prepare' colonoscopy patients. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Aug;11(8):731-740. Epub 2017 Jun 14. PMID: 28594580. [CrossRef]
- Alvarez-Gonzalez, M.A.; Flores-Le Roux, J.A.; Seoane, A.; Pedro-Botet, J.; Carot, L.; Fernandez-Clotet, A.; Raga, A.; Pantaleon, M.A.; Barranco, L.; Bory, F.; et al. Efficacy of a multifactorial strategy for bowel preparation in diabetic patients undergoing colonoscopy: a randomized trial. Endoscopy. 2016 Nov;48(11):1003-1009. Epub 2016 Aug 4. PMID: 27490086. [CrossRef]
- Park, J.S.; Kim, M.S.; Kim, H.; Kim, S.I.; Shin, C.H.; Lee, H.J.; Lee, W.S; Moon, S. A randomized controlled trial of an educational video to improve quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy. BMC Gastroenterol. 2016 Jun 17;16(1):64. PMID: 27317249; PMCID: PMC4912707. [CrossRef]
- Kim, Y.H.; Seo, E.H.; Lee, J.S.; Lee, S.H.; Park, H.S.; Choi, S.H.; Park, J.Y.; Lee, C.W. Inadequate Bowel Cleansing Efficacy of Split-dose Polyethylene Glycol for Colonoscopy in Type 2 Diabetic Patients: A Prospective and Blinded Study. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2017 Mar;51(3):240-246. PMID: 27136960. [CrossRef]
- Rotondano, G.; Rispo, A.; Bottiglieri, M.E.; De Luca, L.; Lamanda, R.; Orsini, L.; Bruzzese, D.; Galloro, G.; SIED Campania PISCoPO study group investigators; Romano, M. et al. Quality of bowel cleansing in hospitalized patients undergoing colonoscopy: A multicentre prospective regional study. Dig Liver Dis. 2015 Aug;47(8):669-74. Epub 2015 Apr 25. PMID: 26028360. [CrossRef]
- Hayes, A.; Buffum, M., Hughes, J. Diabetic colon preparation comparison study. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2011 Sep-Oct;34(5):377-82. PMID: 21979399. [CrossRef]
- Ozturk, N.A.; Gokturk, H.S.; Demir, M.; Unler, G.K.; Gur, G., Yilmaz, U. Efficacy and safety of sodium phosphate for colon cleansing in type 2 diabetes mellitus. South Med J. 2010 Nov;103(11):1097-102. PMID: 20856180. [CrossRef]
- Ozturk, N.A., Gokturk, H.S.; Demir, M.; Erdogan, D.; Unler, G.K.; Gur, G.; Yilmaz, U. The effect of autonomous neuropathy on bowel preparation in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2009 Dec;24(12):1407-12. pub 2009 Jul 7. PMID: 19582466. [CrossRef]
- Hassan, C.; East, J.; Radaelli, F.; Spada, C.; Benamouzig, R.; Bisschops, R.; Bretthauer, M.; Dekker, E.; Dinis-Ribeiro, M.; Ferlitsch, M.; et al. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2019. Endoscopy. 2019 Aug;51(8):775-794. Epub 2019 Jul 11. PMID: 31295746. [CrossRef]
- Johnson, D.A.; Barkun, A.N.; Cohen LB, Dominitz, J.A.; Kaltenbach, T.; Martel, M.; Robertson, D.J.; Richard Boland, C.; Giardello, F.M.; Lieberman, D.A. et al.; US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Optimizing adequacy of bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: recommendations from the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Oct;109(10):1528-45. Epub 2014 Sep 16. PMID: 25223578. [CrossRef]
- Barkun, A.; Chiba, N.; Enns, R.; Marcon, M.; Natsheh, S.; Pham, C.; Sadowski, D.; Vanner, S. Commonly used preparations for colonoscopy: efficacy, tolerability, and safety--a Canadian Association of Gastroenterology position paper. Can J Gastroenterol. 2006 Nov;20(11):699-710. PMID: 17111052; PMCID: PMC2660825. [CrossRef]
- Morgan, E.; Arnold, M.; Gini, A., Lorenzoni, V.; Cabasag, C.J.; Laversanne, M.; Vignat, J.; Ferlay, J.; Murphy, N.; Bray, F. Global burden of colorectal cancer in 2020 and 2040: incidence and mortality estimates from GLOBOCAN. Gut. 2023 Feb;72(2):338-344. Epub 2022 Sep 8. PMID: 36604116. [CrossRef]
- Khan, M.A.B.; Hashim, M.J.; King, J.K.; Govender, R.D.; Mustafa, H; Al Kaabi, J. Epidemiology of Type 2 Diabetes - Global Burden of Disease and Forecasted Trends. J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2020 Mar;10(1):107-111. PMID: 32175717; PMCID: PMC7310804. [CrossRef]
- González, N.; Prieto, I.; Del Puerto-Nevado, L.; Portal-Nuñez, S.; Ardura, J.A.; Corton, M.; Fernández-Fernández, B.; Aguilera, O.; Gomez-Guerrero, C.; Mas, S.; et al. DiabetesCancerConnect Consortium. 2017 update on the relationship between diabetes and colorectal cancer: epidemiology, potential molecular mechanisms and therapeutic implications. Oncotarget. 2017 Mar 14;8(11):18456-18485. PMID: 28060743; PMCID: PMC5392343. [CrossRef]
- Scheithauer, T.P.M.; Rampanelli, E.; Nieuwdorp, M.; Vallance, B.A.; Verchere, C.B.; van Raalte, D.H., Herrema, H. Gut Microbiota as a Trigger for Metabolic Inflammation in Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes. Front Immunol. 2020 Oct 16;11:571731. PMID: 33178196; PMCID: PMC7596417. [CrossRef]
- Chirila, A.; Nguyen, M.E.; Tinmouth, J.; Halperin, I.J. Preparing for Colonoscopy in People with Diabetes: A Review with Suggestions for Clinical Practice. J Can Assoc Gastroenterol. 2022 Dec 30;6(1):26-36. PMID: 36789141; PMCID: PMC9915054. [CrossRef]
- Clipper, F. Y.;, Moussa, M; Jay H. Shubrook; Diabetic Gastroparesis: A Review. Diabetes Spectr 1 August 2020; 33 (3): 290–297. [CrossRef]
- Craciun, C.I.; Neag, M.A.; Catinean, A.; Mitre, A.O.; Rusu, A.; Bala, C.; Roman, G.; Buzoianu, A.D.; Muntean, D.M.; Craciun, A.E. The Relationships between Gut Microbiota and Diabetes Mellitus, and Treatments for Diabetes Mellitus. Biomedicines. 2022 Jan 28;10(2):308. PMID: 35203519; PMCID: PMC8869176. [CrossRef]
- Dyatlova, N.; Tobarran, N.V.; Kannan, L.; North, R.; Wills, B.K. Metformin-Associated Lactic Acidosis (MALA). 2023 Apr 17. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. PMID: 35593810.
- Shankar, A.; Sharma, A., Vinas, A.; Chilton, R.J. GLP-1 receptor agonists and delayed gastric emptying: implications for invasive cardiac interventions and surgery. Cardiovasc Endocrinol Metab. 2024 Dec 4;14(1):e00321. PMID: 39649679; PMCID: PMC11620716. [CrossRef]
- Tang, H.; Zhang. B.; Lu, Y., Donahoo, W.T.; Singh Ospina, N., Kotecha, P.; Lu, Y.; Tong, J.; Smith, S.M.; Rosenberg, E.I. et al. Assessing the benefit-risk profile of newer glucose-lowering drugs: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized outcome trials. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 Mar;27(3):1444-1455. Epub 2024 Dec 26. PMID: 39723481. [CrossRef]
- Thiruvenkatarajan, V., Ingli,s J.M.; Meyer, E.; Umapathysivam, M.M.; Nanjappa, N., Van Wijk, R.; Jesudason, D. Peri-colonoscopy Implications of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitor Therapy: A Mini-review of Available Evidence. Can J Diabetes. 2023 Apr;47(3):287-291. Epub 2022 Dec 24. PMID: 36739255. [CrossRef]
- Yu, F.; Guo, Y.; Wang, H.; Feng, J.; Jin, Z.; Chen, Q., Liu, Y.; He, J. Type 2 diabetes mellitus and risk of colorectal adenoma: a meta-analysis of observational studies. BMC Cancer. 2016 Aug 17;16:642. PMID: 27535548; PMCID: PMC4989384. [CrossRef]
- Zhu, Z.X.; Peng, Y.X.; Ye, J.H.; Wei, Y. The Economic Burden of Colorectal Cancer in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) in Shanghai, China. Cancer Med. 2025 Feb;14(4):e70651. PMID: 39981614; PMCID: PMC11843159. [CrossRef]
| Authors/Year of Publication | Type of study | Study population Number of participants/N |
Results |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abu-Freha N. et al./ 2025. [7] | multicenter retrospective study | 4876 patients treated with GLP-1RAs 4876 controls without GLP-1RA use |
Among the GLP-1RA patients, 10% (n = 487) had IBP compared with 197 (4%) of the control group (P<0.001). Higher rate of IBP among diabetic patients treated with GLP-1RA (284/2364 [12%]) than among diabetic patients without GLP-1RA treatment (118/2364 [5%]; P<0.001) Diabetes and GLP-1RA use were both found to be independent risk factors for IBP |
| Zhang Y. et al. /2024. [8] | systematic review and meta-analysis | six studies (n = 1553) on previous abdominal surgery, six studies (n = 1494) on constipation, seven studies (n = 1505) on diabetes, eight studies (n=2093) on non-compliance with the diet regimen, seven studies (n=1350) on incomplete intake of laxative, and nine studies (n =2163) on inadequate exercise during preparation. | History of abdominal surgery, constipation, diabetes, non-compliance with the diet regimen, incomplete intake of laxative, and inadequate exercise during preparation were independent risk factors for IBP in older patients undergoing colonoscopy. |
| Adamek HE. et al. /2022. [9] | review | many studies | Split dosing of PEG preparations are recommended in diabetes patients with expected motility disorders. Extensive counseling about preparation intake and dietary recommendations should be offered. |
| Zhao M. et al./2022 [10] | prospective cohort study | N=436 | The highest ADR was achieved when the WT of colonoscopy was controlled at 8 min. |
| Lewandowski K. et al./2021. [11] | review | many studies,without final count of study population | Patients with DM are particularly predisposed to inadequate cleansing for endoscopy due to slowing bowel movements, dietary preparation restrictions, glucose reduction, and the resulting symptoms of hypoglycaemia. No comprehensive guidelines of preparation for endoscopic examinations for patients with DM have been developed. |
| Agha OQ. et al./2021. [12] |
review | many studies | DM is associated with suboptimal bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Several studies attempted to optimize bowel preparation in these patients. However, these studies vary in the strength of their evidence, and most of them did not use split-dosing regimens, which are part of the current ASGE recommendation. |
| Ruiz RF. et al. /2020. [13] | randomized controlled trial | N=100 participants | Colonoscopy was performed after upper digestive endoscopy at two different times: 3 versus 6-hour after 10% mannitol ingestion.The subgroup of patients with diabetes mellitus showed statistically significant higher RGV values in the 3-hour group. |
| Fuccio L. et al. /2020. [14] | prospective observational study | N=1032 participants | Bedridden status, constipation, diabetes mellitus, use of anti-psychotic drugs, and 7 or more days of hospitalization increased risk of inadequate colon cleansing. |
| Hochberg I. et al./2019. [15] | review | many studies | To prevent the risk of hypoglycemia, hyperglycemia and ketoacidosis lactic acidosis, and to improve bowel preparation in people with DM, clear guidelines should be provided regarding diet, medication timing and glucose monitoring. There is evidence that mid-morning scheduling (after 9:30 a.m.) improves bowel preparation in patients with DM as it facilitates the adherence to a split-dosing of the laxative. |
| Megna B.et al./2018. [16] | observational study | N=88 participants | Risk factors older age, history of DM, the timing and split dosing of preparation solution, and procedure time (AM or PM), chronic narcotic use, and history of constipation) for inadequate bowel preparation were not associated with the ability to perform CE. |
| Mahmood S. et al. /2018. [17] | meta-analysis | Twenty-four studies with a total of 49 868 patients | Age, male sex, inpatient status, DM, hypertension, cirrhosis, narcotic use, constipation, stroke, and tricyclic antidepressant were associated with inadequate bowel preparation. |
| Anklesaria AB. et al./2019. [18] | observational Study | N= 1429 patients | Male gender (P=0.002), diabetes mellitus (P<0.0001), liver cirrhosis (P=0.001), coronary artery disease (P=0.003), refractory constipation (P<0.0001), and current smoking (P=0.01) were found to be independently predictive of poor bowel preparation. |
| Mandolesi D. et al. /2017. [19] | review | many studies | The quality of colonoscopy has become a hot topic. The approach to patients with an increased risk of poor bowel preparation quality is still not always supported by high-quality evidence. Trials focused on this subgroup of patients are recommended to provide tailored bowel preparation regimens and guarantee high-quality procedures. |
| Alvarez-Gonzalez MA. et al./ 2016. [20] | Randomized Controlled Trial | N=150 patients with type 2 DM N= 74 conventional bowel preparation protocol (CBP) versus N=76 a diabetes-specific preparation protocol (DSP) |
Inadequate bowel cleansing was more frequent following CBP than DSP (20 % vs. 7 %, P = 0.014). |
| Park JS. et al./2016. [21] | Randomized Controlled Trial | N=520 patients | Males, DM, and non-use of visual aids were associated with poor bowel preparation. The addition of an educational video could improve the quality of bowel preparation in comparison with standard preparation method. |
| Kim YH. et al. /2017. [22] | Randomized Controlled Trial | N=55 consecutive non-diabetic and N= 50 diabetic patients | Diabetic patients had a worse preparation quality and longer cecal intubation and total procedure time compared with non-diabetic patients. These data suggest that split-dose PEG preparation regimen is not sufficient for optimal bowel preparation in diabetic patients undergoing colonoscopy. |
| Rotondano G. et al./2015. [23] | Prospective multicentre study | 2178 outpatients, 1098 inpatients | In the overall population, independent predictors of inadequate cleansing both at the level of right and left colon were: male gender, diabetes mellitus, chronic constipation, incomplete purge intake and a runway time >12h. No difference in the rate of inadequate bowel preparation between hospitalized patients and outpatients were found. |
| Hayes A. et al./2011. [24] | Randomized Controlled Trial | 198 persons with DM | Patients in the diabetic colon preparation group had 70% good colon preparations compared with 54% in the standard group, and this finding was significant (χ = 5.14, p = 0.02). Results indicate that diabetic patients receiving 10 ounces of magnesium citrate 2 days prior to their colonoscopies followed by 10 ounces of magnesium citrate and 4-L polyethylene glycol the day prior to the procedure had cleaner colons than those receiving standard preparation of 10 ounces of magnesium citrate and 4-L polyethylene glycol the day prior to procedure. This colon preparation is safe, feasible, well-tolerated, and effective. |
| Ozturk NA. et al./2010. [25] | Controlled Clinical Trial | 50 consecutive type 2 diabetic patients and 50 non-diabetic patients | Data suggest that NaP is safe and tolerable in diabetic patients, but the quality of bowel cleansing is worse than in non-diabetic patients. These observations support the concept that the quality of bowel cleansing in those with type 2 diabetes is closely related to the duration and regulation of the disease and the presence of late complications. |
| Ozturk NA. et al./2009. [26]. | Clinical Trial | 45 patients with DM and 48 non-diabetic | These data suggest that optimal bowel cleansing is poorer in diabetics with autonomous neuropathy than in those without autonomous neuropathy and controls. Although optimal bowel cleansing was more prevalent among control patients than in diabetic patients without autonomous neuropathy, the difference was not significant (87.1% vs 93.8%; p > 0.05). |
| Guidelines/Organization (reference) | Date of publication | Specific recommendations for bowel preparation for diabetic patients (YES/NO/mentioned but without clear guidelines) |
|---|---|---|
| European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline [27] | 2019 | NO |
| US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer: American College of Gastroenterology, American Gastroenterological Association, and the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy [28] |
2014 | mentioned but without clear guidelines |
| Canadian Association of Gastroenterology [29] | 2006 | NO |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
