1. Introduction
Globally, tuberculosis (TB), due to its transmissible nature, exerts an enormous impact on both individual and public health, resulting in significant morbidity and mortality and, fundamentally, posing a menace to the well-being of the populace in this 21st century [
1,
2]. On an annual basis, over 10 million people get sick with TB; this number has not abated since 2021, thereby making TB the leading cause of demise from a single infectious agent globally [
3,
4]. The emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a global surge in TB incidence and mortality. Hence, a concerted effort to minimize TB transmission must be implemented [
2]. Three significant components explored in the global approach to TB control involve optimizing prevention, timely detection, and prompt initiation of anti-TB treatment [
5,
6].
The possibility of transmission of infection of multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) is high when the infected patients are culture-positive hence infection control measures aim to reduce the time to culture conversion as MDR-TB patients with culture-positive outcomes are more likely to transmit the infection to others [
7,
8]. According to the WHO guideline, while treating MDR-TB, culture negative results for two consecutive months, usually 30 days apart, is mandatory for concluding culture conversion [
7,
9,
10]. In its guidelines, the WHO recommended that all TB patients undergoing treatment should be under close monitoring to evaluate their treatment response [
11]. First-line anti-TB treatment is carried out in two phases, namely intensive and continuation phases, with drugs ranging from isoniazid, rifampicin, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide [
12]. During treatment, monitoring for the presence of acid-fact bacilli (AFB) in the respiratory tract of patients with pulmonary TB (PTB) is done in the form of sputum smear examination (sputum smear microscopy) or sputum culturing [
13]. Sputum smear-conversion, a transition from baseline smear-positive to smear-negative, during the 2nd or 5th month of treatment initiation, is a fundamental measure and indicator of treatment success [
12,
13,
14,
15,
16]. Ideally, most TB cases are estimated to convert to smear-negative after anti-TB treatment in the intensive phase; on the contrary, a significant figure remains unchanged bacteriologically, thereby in-creasing the duration of infectivity [
17].
Delayed sputum conversion patients (DSCPs) are usually characterized by the persistence of sputum-positive PTB status upon completion of the intensive treatment phase, contributing to higher treatment costs and additional burden on healthcare ser-vices (16]. Non-conversion of sputum smear at the end of the intensive phase of treatment has been documented to be associated with unfavorable outcomes, more specifically with default and failure.
The Eastern Cape is a high-burden region for TB particularly MDR-TB which is characterized by lowest TB case detection and coupled with the fact that no previous research had been carried out recently on sputum smear conversion during treatment among PTB patients. Additionally, it has the third-highest burden of HIV with a 25.2% prevalence rate in the country. Limited funds, deficient standardized training, and competing clinical attention priorities are some of the factors that impede timely and efficient provision of HIV services and care in the Eastern Cape [
18,
19,
20]. This dual disease burden profoundly impacts sputum conversion rates and treatment outcomes with the propensity of straining its population bedeviled with preexisting socioeconomic inequality further, leading to deteriorating health conditions. The study findings will provide evidence-based results to districts and regional-level TB control programs to make informed decisions to control factors and improve the effectiveness of the anti-TB treatment follow-up period. Therefore, the aim of the current research was to review retrospectively medical records evaluating factors influencing sputum conversion during anti-TB treatment, focusing on demographics, clinical conditions, and treatment regimens among drug-resistant TB patients in Eastern Cape South Africa.
4. Discussion
Early sputum culture conversion is prognostic of favorable TB treatment outcomes. This retrospective cohort study explores patient sputum conversion dynamics during tuberculosis treatment. Our analysis revealed that the median time to sputum smear conversion varied depending on the presence or absence of comorbidities. The patients with no comorbidities had a median conversion time of 59 days. This was comparable to other studies with a median time of 56 days [
22], 59 days [
23,
24] 60 days [
25], and 62 days [
8]. In contrast, some other studies reported lower median sputum conversion times of 21 days [
17], 24 days [
13], and 35 days [
26], while other studies had higher conversion times [
24,
27]. Differences in socioeconomic status, study period, follow-up term, clinical characteristics of study participants, and the effectiveness of the TB control program could account for the disparities among the different studies [
28].
Approximately 88% of the DR-TB patients included in this study achieved sputum conversion in the first two months of treatment, ranging from median time of 29 days to 59 days. However, other studies in different countries have reported lower percentage of conversion at the second month including Latvia (30%) [
29], Dominican Republic (48.8%) [
30], and Pakistan 53.4% [
31]. In this study, 7.7% and 0.2% of the patients achieved sputum conversion by the third and fourth months, respectively. In contrast to our study, higher conversion rates were reported in India (57%) [
32] at the third month of treatment, while other studies reported relatively higher conversion rates in India (79-98%) [
32,
33,
34], South Africa (89%) [
35], and Peru (92.9%) [
23] at the sixth month. Reduced time to sputum culture conversion is a crucial infection control prevention strategy since there is reduced possibility of spreading infections to other members of the family, healthcare personnel, and the community. Hence, attaining a faster sputum smear conversion enhances easier therapy, efficacy and comfortability for the patient by reducing injectable drug administration and the associated vestibular toxicity and aural loss [
36,
37,
38].
In this study, DR-TB patients who were HIV coinfected had a longer time of sputum smear conversion than HIV-negative patients. HIV infection compromises the immune system, which could hinder the body's ability to respond effectively to TB treatment. In theory, HIV-negative individuals might have a more robust immune response, potentially leading to quicker sputum conversion. This finding is corroborated by other studies done in Northern Ethiopia [
37], Eastern Ethiopia [
15], Peru [
23] and a prospective cohort study conducted in nine countries [
39], showing that HIV co-infected patients had significantly longer time to culture conversion as compared with HIV negative; although in our study the analysis of the association and correlation between HIV status and sputum conversion rates reveals no statistically significant association. The lack of significant association suggests that HIV status alone may not strongly predict sputum conversion rates in this dataset. Other factors such as treatment adherence and comorbidities might play a larger role. However, the study of Rieu et al., Senkoro et al., and Hafkin et al. conducted in London, Tanzania, and Botswana, respectively, showed that there was no significant difference in sputum smear conversion time between HIV-positive and negative individuals [
24,
40,
41]. Some studies suggest that HIV-negative patients might achieve sputum culture conversion slightly later than HIV-positive patients, but this does not necessarily translate to a higher conversion rate overall. Contrary to our finding, a study in Lesotho found that HIV-positive patients achieved sputum culture clearance at a median of 54.22 days, while HIV-negative patients took 60.84 days [
42]. The reasons that support this finding could be due to a wholly integrated TB/HIV and MDR-TB/HIV continuum of care model which prioritized prompt ART initiation and patient follow-up thus improving patient outcome [
37]. According to Gamachu et al. [
15], the difference between the intensity of follow-up and screening for TB-HIV coinfection may account for this disparity since early and timely screening forms part of the objectives of the TB/HIV integrated programs thereby ensuring these patients are kept under a close watch.
Recent studies highlight the growing adoption of shorter regimens (6–9 months) for DR-TB to improve adherence and reduce loss to follow-up. In the current study, patients on short regimen generally achieved faster conversion, which aligns with the goal of shorter treatment durations. Studies indicate that patients on short treatment regimen (STR) for DR-TB tend to achieve sputum culture conversion more quickly than those on longer regimen. Our finding is supported by a study in Pakistan which found that the mean time to sputum culture conversion (SCC) was significantly shorter in the STR group compared to the longer treatment regimen (LTR) group, with mean times of 2.03 months for STR versus 2.69 months for LTR [
43]. These findings provide strong evidence to support the efficacy of the short regimen for faster sputum conversion. Patients on longer treatment regimens often experience slower sputum culture conversion. This could be due to several factors, including the complexity of drug resistance patterns and the need for more extensive treatment to ensure cure. However, there is no significant difference in the proportion of patients achieving SCC between the two groups.
Regarding treatment outcome, our study confirms that short regimen demonstrated a significantly higher percentage of favorable outcomes (~90%), with very few unfavorable outcomes (~10%). This highlights the effectiveness of the short regimen in achieving treatment success. However, the long regimen shows a much lower percentage of favorable outcomes (~52%) and a higher proportion of unfavorable outcomes (~48%). Studies have shown that short regimens often achieve higher treatment success rates compared to longer regimens. In agreement with our study, a systematic review and meta-analysis reported that the pooled proportion of successful treatment outcomes was 80.0% for shorter regimens versus 75.3% for longer regimens, largely as a result of loss to follow-up with the former [
44,
45]. Notably, another study in Eastern Cape, South Africa reported a 69% success rate with short regimens compared to 58% for long regimens [
46], while another study from Tanzania documented that the majority of DR-TB patients on short treatment regimen (STR) achieved a better treatment outcome than on standard longer regimen (SLR) [
47]. Short regimen tend to have lower rates of loss to follow-up, which contributes to their higher overall success rates. This is attributed to the shorter duration and potentially fewer side effects, making it easier for patients to adhere to treatment [
44]. But in some cases, there is the possibility of a higher risk of treatment failure or relapse when the issue of drug resistance arises. However, some studies suggest that longer regimen might offer better long-term efficacy by reducing the risk of relapse, although this comes at the cost of longer treatment durations and potential side effects [
45].
In the current study, the multivariable analysis revealed that older age showed a small positive association with favorable outcomes (coefficient: 0.039, p = 0.045). This is similar to the study conducted at Alemgena Health Center, located in Sebeta district of Ethiopia where treatment success rate was 3.582 (95% CI 1.958–6.554, p-value = 0.000) times higher in the age group 44 and below compared to the age group 45 and above [
48]. However, contrary findings were reported by Leketa et al. [
49] and Massud et al. [
50] where the authors found statistically significant lower odds of unfavourable treatment outcomes among the patients who were ≤ 44 years old compared to those who were > 44 years old and patients aged >50 years had higher odds of unsuccessful outcomes (OR = 2.149, p = 0.048), respectively. Our results suggest older age improves outcomes, while other studies associate younger age or middle age with better outcomes. This discrepancy may arise from differences in study populations (e.g., comorbidities in older adults or variations in adherence patterns. Male gender in our study had marginal significance (coefficient: 0.940, p = 0.056). The findings reported from a study carried out in Bilene, Mozambique [
51], also identified male sex as a factor associated with unfavorable TB treatment outcomes (aOR 1.48). This suggests males may have a slightly higher likelihood of favorable outcomes. Male gender was significantly associated with successful outcomes (AOR = 2.40, CI 1.16, 4.98, p < 0.05) in Northwest Ethiopia while gender was not a significant predictor in another study conducted in the Eastern Cape of South Africa [
52,
53]. The stronger association in Limenh et al. may reflect regional gender-specific healthcare access or adherence behaviors while our result suggests gender’s role may vary by population. Furthermore, in our study, HIV-positive patients are less likely to achieve favorable outcomes, but this is not statistically significant (coefficient: -0.753 p-value: 0.124). Similarly, a study in Northwest Ethiopia found that HIV-negative patients were significantly more likely to have successful TB treatment outcomes (AOR = 3.35, 95% CI: 1.31, 8.60, p < 0.05) [
52].
The limitations highlighted in this study include the retrospective nature of the study design which may introduce biases related to data completeness, and the exclusion of certain variables due to a lack of a complete set of laboratory and clinical data. In addition, the study did not include the CD4 count and ART status of HIV patients, so the logistic regression model analysis was not adjusted for ART; the data quality, including self-reported smoking and drinking status, was also subject to selection of response and recall bias.
5. Conclusions
Most of the subjects in our study had effective sputum culture conversion within the first four months. Interestingly, about 88% of the patients who underwent TB treatment converted in the first two months with a median time ranging from 29 to 59 days. Our study's median time to culture conversion was within the range the WHO recommends. Our results highlight how crucial it is to assess the treatment response of DR-TB patients, especially those who have history of comorbidities that may interfere with their treatment. Notably, patients on short regimen demonstrated faster sputum conversion rates, aligning with the goal of reducing treatment duration. Moreover, these patients exhibited a significantly higher percentage of favorable outcomes, approximately 90%, with only about 10% experiencing unfavorable outcomes. These results support the use of a short regimen as an effective strategy for improving treatment outcomes in DR-TB patients. The faster sputum conversion and higher success rates observed in this study suggest that short regimen can enhance patient adherence and reduce the risk of treatment failure or relapse. However, it is crucial to consider individual patient factors, such as drug resistance patterns and health status, when selecting treatment regimens. With rural areas in South Africa facing systemic barriers such as healthcare access and stigma which complicate DR-TB management, it is anticipated that the effort of the South African National TB Recovery Plan 3.0 in rolling out shorter regimens with better drugs for the treatment of DR-TB, with the notable launch of the BPAL-L program, having over 2,000 patients on a six-month DR-TB regimen will contribute greatly to the reduction of the TB burden even in the rural areas if implemented to scale.
Overall, this study contributes valuable evidence to the continued efforts to optimize DR-TB treatment strategies, highlighting the potential benefits of shorter treatment durations in achieving favorable outcomes and enhancing public health outcomes. Future research should continue to explore the long-term efficacy and safety of short regimens in diverse patient populations to further inform treatment guidelines.