Submitted:
14 March 2025
Posted:
17 March 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
Introduction
- mHealth Apps and Their Functionality
- Types of mHealth Apps
- Tracking Apps: These apps assist patients in monitoring key health metrics like blood glucose levels, physical activity, and caloric intake. For example, diabetes patients often use glucose monitoring apps to log their blood sugar levels throughout the day, helping them identify trends and triggers [5]. Obese patients may use weight-tracking apps to track their progress toward weight loss goals while receiving feedback on their diet and exercise habits [6].
- Educational Apps: These apps offer patients valuable information on disease management, lifestyle changes, and self-care. They educate users about healthy diet choices, exercise routines, and medication adherence. Many mHealth apps provide personalized content based on an individual's specific health condition and goals [7]. For instance, diabetes management apps often feature educational tools on carbohydrate counting and strategies to manage blood glucose fluctuations.
- Medication Reminders: A key feature for diabetes and obesity patients is medication adherence. Many mHealth apps include reminder systems that notify users to take their medications at specific times. This is especially important for diabetes patients who need to manage insulin doses and blood glucose-lowering medications consistently [5].
- Patient-Provider Communication: Some mHealth apps enable secure messaging between patients and healthcare providers, allowing users to discuss symptoms, adjust treatment plans, and receive professional guidance without the need for in-person visits. This feature is particularly valuable for individuals managing chronic conditions who require continuous monitoring and support but face challenges accessing healthcare services regularly [8].
- Technological Features
- -
- Real-time Monitoring: By integrating wearable devices like glucose meters or fitness trackers, mHealth apps enable continuous monitoring of vital health metrics. This allows patients to keep track of their condition at all times and take action when necessary [4].
- -
- Data Integration and Analysis: Many apps collect data from various sources, such as wearables and user input, to generate reports or graphs. This integration helps users easily track their health progress and identify behavioral trends that may influence their health outcomes [5].
- -
- Personalization: Using algorithms, mHealth apps often tailor content and advice to individual users. For example, a weight loss app might adjust diet and exercise plans based on a user’s progress and preferences [7]. This personalization boosts patient engagement and improves adherence to health recommendations.
- -
- Gamification and Social Features: To enhance patient engagement, many apps include gamification elements, such as rewards, badges, and challenges. Some also have social features, where users can share their progress or join community challenges, creating a sense of accountability and motivation [9].
- Clinical Evidence Supporting mHealth Functionality
- Challenges and Limitations of mHealth Apps
- Purpose of the study
- Objectives
- To assess the demographic profile of individuals using mHealth apps for managing diabetes, obesity, and hypertension – Investigated how factors like age, gender, and living environment (urban vs. rural) influenced the adoption and use of mHealth apps for managing these conditions.
- To explore the relationship between mHealth app usage and users' motivation to manage their health – Examined the role of mHealth apps in goal-setting, raising health awareness, and boosting motivation for making lifestyle changes in individuals managing diabetes, obesity, and hypertension.
- To evaluate the perceived impact of mHealth apps on lifestyle modifications of users with chronic health conditions – Investigated how mHealth apps contributed to lifestyle changes, such as better self-monitoring and positive behavioral changes (e.g., diet, exercise, medication adherence).
- To identify the key features of mHealth apps that users found most beneficial in managing their health conditions – Assessed user preferences for specific app features (e.g., social support, goal tracking, integration with wearables) and how these features supported their health management efforts.
- To assess overall user satisfaction with mHealth apps in supporting lifestyle changes for diabetes, obesity, and hypertension – Determined the satisfaction levels of users and identified areas for improvement based on feedback, including desires for additional features like chat support and personalized recommendations.
- To explore the role of community support features in the effectiveness of mHealth apps – Analyzed how social features, such as online groups or challenges, influenced user engagement and success in managing their health conditions.
Material and Methods
- Study Design: This study was designed as an observational research project to evaluate the impact of mHealth applications on lifestyle changes in individuals managing chronic health conditions, including diabetes, obesity, and hypertension. The goal was to examine the relationship between app usage and lifestyle modifications, with a focus on motivation, health awareness, and user satisfaction.
- Participants: A total of 147 individuals participated in the study. Participants were selected through convenience sampling and had to meet the following inclusion criteria: (1) adults aged 18 and older, (2) diagnosed with at least one of the following conditions: diabetes, obesity, or hypertension, and (3) currently using mHealth applications for health management. The study included both male and female participants, spread across different age groups, and from both urban and rural areas.
- Exclusion Criteria: Participants who were not using mHealth applications for health management were excluded from the study. This ensured that the sample consisted only of individuals who had direct experience with using mHealth apps.
- Data Collection: Data were collected through a structured questionnaire specifically developed for this study. The questionnaire included both closed and open-ended questions to gather information on participants' demographics, health conditions, mHealth app usage patterns, and the perceived impact of the apps on their health and lifestyle. The survey was administered online, allowing for broad accessibility, and was completed voluntarily by participants.
- Questionnaire Components
- Demographic Information: Age, gender, living environment, and health conditions (diabetes, obesity, hypertension).
- mHealth App Usage: Frequency of app use, primary reasons for using the app, goal-setting behavior, and app features (e.g., community support, tracking, wearable integration).
- Impact on Lifestyle: Changes in health awareness, self-monitoring, and lifestyle modifications (e.g., diet, exercise).
- User Feedback: Overall satisfaction, suggestions for app improvements, and the perceived benefits of app features (e.g., chat support, personalized recommendations).
- Ethical Considerations: The study followed ethical guidelines and received approval from the relevant institutional review board. All participants provided informed consent before taking part in the survey. The confidentiality of participant responses was maintained, and data were anonymized during analysis to protect privacy.
Results
- Age: Participants were spread across seven age groups, with the largest group being between 35-44 years (29.1%), followed by those in the 25-34 years group (18.8%). The smallest groups were the 55-64 years (10.1%) and 65+ years (10.8%) age ranges.
- Gender Distribution: Female participants made up the majority of the sample (73.5%), while male participants represented 26.5%.
- Area of Residence: Most participants lived in urban areas (82.2%), with a smaller proportion coming from rural areas (17.8%).
- Education Level: A significant proportion of participants had a college education (64.8%), while 21.3% had completed high school. Around 14.2% of participants did not disclose their educational background.
- Employment Status: The majority of participants were employed (79.9%), with retired individuals accounting for 12.2%. Smaller numbers of participants were students (6.1%) or unemployed (2.0%).
- -
- Frequency of Use: The majority of participants (66, or 40.00%) reported using the mHealth app daily, indicating it had become an essential part of their routine. A smaller group (40, or 24.39%) used the app weekly, while 24 (14.63%) used it occasionally, and 17 (10.98%) used it rarely. This suggested that the app was widely used by a core group, though there was variability in usage frequency among the participants.
- -
- User Experience & Accessibility: When asked about how easy it was to access and navigate the app, most users found it user-friendly, with 115 (71.94%) selecting "easy." A small proportion (7, or 4.35%) found the app difficult to use, while 25 (15.53%) were neutral about it. This showed that the app's design was largely intuitive and easy to navigate for most participants. As for overall satisfaction with the app’s performance, 130 users (81.39%) said they were satisfied, while just 7 (4.35%) expressed dissatisfaction. This high satisfaction rate indicated that the app generally met or exceeded users' expectations in terms of functionality.
- -
- App Features: The most appreciated features of the app were reminders, chosen by 100 (63.29%) participants, and tracking features, selected by 47 (29.63%). This highlighted the app's role in helping users stay on top of their health goals. When assessing the app's design, 96 (60.38%) rated it as "good," while 24 (15.38%) felt neutral, and only 2 (1.27%) thought the design was poor. This suggested a strong overall appreciation for the app's aesthetic quality.
- -
- User Feedback: Participants provided feedback on aspects they didn’t like about the app, with 102 (64.55%) mentioning the issue of excessive ads. Additionally, 25 (15.82%) raised concerns about functional issues, and 20 (12.69%) wanted more features. While the app performed well in many areas, addressing the ad-related complaints and expanding its features could further improve the user experience.
- -
- Health Impact & Effectiveness: When it came to the app’s positive influence on health, 130 (81.39%) users said it had made a positive impact. This indicated that the app was largely successful in promoting better health management. Regarding specific health changes, 116 (73.42%) participants reported improvements in glucose levels, and 98 (62.02%) noticed a change in their weight. Other areas of improvement included Hb A1C levels (50, or 31.65%), LDL cholesterol (70, or 44.29%), and triglyceride levels (66, or 41.88%). Many users (113, or 71.31%) also saw better adherence to diet or nutritional recommendations, 94 (59.62%) increased their physical activity, and 77 (48.71%) experienced improvements in mental health. These findings demonstrated the broad, positive impact of the app on various health indicators.
- -
- Usefulness & Value: In terms of overall usefulness, 68 (43.28%) users agreed the app was helpful for managing their health, while 30 (19.08%) were neutral, and 49 (31.21%) did not find it useful. This suggested that while the app was beneficial for a substantial number of users, it might not have met everyone’s needs equally. When asked about premium features, 105 (66.88%) users felt that they were worth the cost, while 42 (26.58%) did not find the premium features valuable. This indicated that premium features were generally appreciated by those who opted to pay for them.
- -
- Data Sharing & Security: Data security was a concern for 95 (60.38%) users, with many expressing hesitation about sharing personal data through the app. Despite these concerns, 95 (60.38%) participants shared their app data with their doctors, which showed that the app had been integrated into their healthcare management. Additionally, 95 (60.38%) users confirmed that their doctors had either approved or recommended using the app, highlighting its credibility and encouraging greater adoption.
Discussion
Conclusion
References
- Free, C., Phillips, G., Galli, L., Watkinson, S., & Rait, G. (2013). The effectiveness of mobile-health technology-based health behaviour change or disease management interventions for health care consumers: A systematic review. PLOS Med, 10(1), e1001362. [CrossRef]
- Boulos, M. N. K., Lu, Z., & Sillitoe, J. (2014). mHealth: Mobile phone use for health care. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 46(6), 945-950.
- American Diabetes Association. (2020). Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2020. Diabetes Care, 43(Suppl 1), S66–S76.
- Mann, T. P., Tomiyama, A. J., & Westling, E. (2007). Medicare recipients' health behaviors and physical activity in the management of obesity and diabetes. Diabetes Care, 30(6), 1-8.
- Liu, J., Wei, W., & Zhang, Y. (2017). Mobile health interventions for diabetes management. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 11(4), 730-738.
- Wing, R. R., & Phelan, S. (2005). Long-term weight loss maintenance. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 82(1), 222-225. [CrossRef]
- Lyles, C. R., Schillinger, D., & Adler, N. (2017). mHealth interventions for chronic disease management. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 52(1), 77-81.
- Zhou, L., Soran, D., & He, M. (2018). Mobile health interventions for obesity and diabetes: A review of current research. Current Diabetes Reports, 18(9), 61-70.
- Cohn, E. S., Moser, S. E., & Agboola, S. (2018). Gamification and mobile health: The role of social support in motivating behavior change. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(9), 1-10.
- Wang, T., Zheng, R., & He, X. (2020). Effectiveness of mHealth interventions for weight loss and physical activity in patients with obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Obesity, 44(6), 1204-1213.
- Gardner, B., Rebar, A. L., & Lally, P. (2020). A systematic review and meta-analysis of mHealth interventions for weight loss and maintenance. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(2), e13051.
- Milani, R. V., & Lavie, C. J. (2017). Improving health outcomes with mobile health technology. The American Journal of Medicine, 130(5), 11-17.
- Cole-Lewis H, Kershaw T. Text messaging as a tool for behavior change in disease prevention and management. Epidemiol Rev. 2010;32(1):56-69. [CrossRef]
- Anderson, J., Rainie, L. and Luchsinger, A. (2018) Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Humans. Pew Research Center, 120-123.
- Boulos, M. N. K., Resch, B., & Crowley, D. (2016). The role of mobile health apps in promoting physical activity. International Journal of Health Geographics, 15(1), 55.
- López, M. J., García, A. R., & Ruiz, P. (2019). Designing user-friendly mobile health apps for chronic disease management. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(5), e1087.
- Baig, M. M., GholamHosseini, H., & Bamidis, P. D. (2019). Mobile health applications: System design review, critical issues and challenges. Journal of Medical Systems, 43(4), 98. [CrossRef]
- Patel, V., Rausch, R., & Shah, A. (2015). Mobile health applications: Barriers and solutions for health interventions. Global Health Journal, 4(1), 30-42.
- González, M. D., Villarreal, J., & Velasco, E. (2020). The impact of advertising on user retention in mobile health applications. Health Technology, 10(3), 123–129.
- Li, J., Li, F., & Chen, C. (2017). The effectiveness of mobile health applications in the management of diabetes: A systematic review. Diabetes Care, 40(5), 672-679.
- Hwang, Gwo-Jen, et al. "Vision, challenges, roles and research issues of Artificial Intelligence in Education." Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence 1 (2020): 100001. [CrossRef]
- Schoeppe, S., Rebar, A., & Gammage, K. (2016). Barriers to engagement in mobile health applications: An examination of the literature. Mobile Health Review, 6(4), 233-245.
- Martin, E., Johnson, A., & Wang, X. (2017). User concerns about privacy in mobile health apps: An exploratory study. Journal of Health Informatics, 24(6), 392–399.
- Chung, A., Young, R., & Lee, T. (2020). Data sharing and security concerns in mobile health applications. Journal of Digital Health, 6(2), 112–123.
- Vasilenko, S., Dorian, J., & Robinson, S. (2018). Privacy and data security concerns in health apps. Cybersecurity in Healthcare, 5(2), 24–38.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
