Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Navigating Supply Chain Challenges with Digital Transformation for Agility and Resilience

Submitted:

11 February 2025

Posted:

12 February 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
This research examines the impact of digital transformation on improving supply chain agility and resilience, highlighting the growing need for firms to use sophisticated technologies to sustain competitiveness in a swiftly evolving business landscape. The study examines the role of digital technologies, including artificial intelligence, blockchain, big data analytics, and the Internet of Things, in enhancing supply chain efficiency, facilitating real-time decision-making, and improving adaptation to disruptions. The report offers a thorough examination of how digital transformation enhances responsiveness and operational performance by addressing critical elements such as leadership commitment, cooperation, and sustainability. The study technique used a qualitative approach, emphasizing topic analysis to extract insights from industry specialists. The results indicate that firms adopting digital transformation achieve significant enhancements in risk management, operational efficiency, and stakeholder collaboration. Leadership is essential for the effective implementation of digital projects, facilitating cultural transformations, and aligning organizational strategy with technology progress. Sustainability is a crucial element, as organizations incorporate environmentally responsible practices into their supply chain strategy to fulfill regulatory and customer demands. The research also delineates obstacles linked to digital transformation, such as reluctance to change, cybersecurity issues, and the intricacy of assimilating new technology with current systems. Notwithstanding these challenges, the study emphasizes the need of a comprehensive strategy that integrates technology, leadership, and cooperation to attain enduring resilience and agility. This study's findings provide essential direction for firms aiming to improve their supply chain capabilities via digital transformation, presenting a framework for managing the complexity of contemporary supply networks.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Digital transformation has emerged as a critical enabler of supply chain agility and resilience in an increasingly complex and uncertain global business environment. The rapid advancement of technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI), the Internet of Things (IoT), blockchain, big data analytics, and cloud computing has significantly reshaped supply chain operations, enabling firms to enhance their responsiveness to disruptions and market dynamics (Belhadi et al., 2024). Traditional supply chain models, which were largely linear and reliant on manual processes, are being replaced by interconnected, real-time digital ecosystems that facilitate better visibility, data-driven decision-making, and predictive capabilities. This transformation is particularly important given the rising frequency of supply chain disruptions, which can stem from geopolitical tensions, natural disasters, pandemics, and economic volatility (Chatterjee & Chaudhuri, 2022; Emon & Khan, 2024). In this context, businesses are leveraging digital technologies to improve their adaptability and ensure business continuity by making supply chains more responsive, flexible, and resilient (Al-Banna et al., 2023). Supply chain agility refers to an organization’s ability to respond quickly and effectively to changes in demand, supply fluctuations, and external disruptions. Agility is a key performance driver that enables firms to mitigate risks, capitalize on opportunities, and maintain a competitive advantage in volatile market conditions (Alfalla-Luque et al., 2023; Khan & Emon, 2024). Digital transformation plays a crucial role in enhancing agility by integrating advanced analytics, automation, and digital communication tools that facilitate seamless coordination across supply chain networks. For example, AI-driven predictive analytics allow firms to anticipate demand fluctuations and optimize inventory levels in real time, reducing waste and minimizing stockouts (Belhadi et al., 2024). Similarly, IoT-enabled sensors and smart tracking systems enhance supply chain visibility by providing real-time data on inventory, logistics, and transportation, enabling companies to make faster and more informed decisions (De Vass et al., 2021). These capabilities contribute to greater supply chain agility by reducing lead times, increasing operational efficiency, and improving overall responsiveness. Resilience, on the other hand, refers to a supply chain’s ability to withstand and recover from disruptions while maintaining operational stability and continuity. Digital transformation strengthens supply chain resilience by enabling companies to build redundancy, enhance risk management, and improve collaboration across stakeholders (Ali et al., 2024; Emon et al., 2025). One of the key digital tools driving resilience is blockchain technology, which enhances supply chain transparency and traceability, reducing fraud and ensuring product authenticity (Bischoff & Seuring, 2021). Blockchain-based smart contracts automate transactions and reduce dependency on intermediaries, ensuring a more secure and efficient supply chain. Moreover, big data analytics play a vital role in identifying potential risks by analyzing vast amounts of structured and unstructured data from multiple sources, allowing firms to develop proactive risk mitigation strategies (Bahrami et al., 2022; Khan et al., 2025). Companies that integrate these digital solutions into their supply chain strategies can better anticipate, respond to, and recover from disruptions, ensuring long-term sustainability and operational efficiency. The integration of Industry 4.0 technologies in supply chain management has further accelerated digital transformation efforts. Industry 4.0 encompasses automation, robotics, cyber-physical systems, and cloud computing, all of which contribute to creating highly interconnected and self-optimizing supply chains (Bag et al., 2021; Emon et al., 2024). Smart factories, powered by AI and IoT, enable real-time monitoring of production processes, predictive maintenance of machinery, and seamless communication between supply chain partners (Alzoubi et al., 2024). These technological advancements not only improve efficiency but also enhance supply chain agility by enabling rapid adjustments to changing market conditions. Additionally, digital twins—virtual replicas of physical supply chain processes—allow companies to simulate different scenarios and optimize decision-making in response to disruptions (Aslam et al., 2020). This capability is particularly useful in industries with complex and global supply chains, where minor inefficiencies can lead to significant financial losses. A significant factor driving digital transformation in supply chain management is the increasing demand for sustainability and regulatory compliance. Governments and consumers are pushing for more transparent, environmentally responsible, and ethical supply chain practices (Chowdhury & Quaddus, 2021). Digital technologies enable firms to monitor and report their carbon footprint, track the ethical sourcing of raw materials, and ensure compliance with evolving environmental regulations (Chatterjee & Chaudhuri, 2022; Khan et al., 2024). For instance, IoT and AI-powered sustainability dashboards help organizations measure energy consumption, waste generation, and greenhouse gas emissions in real time, facilitating data-driven sustainability initiatives (De Vass et al., 2021). Blockchain technology further strengthens supply chain transparency by providing an immutable record of transactions, allowing companies to verify the authenticity of sustainable sourcing claims (Bischoff & Seuring, 2021; Khan & Emon, 2025). By adopting digital transformation strategies, companies can align their supply chain operations with sustainability goals while simultaneously improving efficiency and reducing costs. One of the key challenges organizations face in implementing digital transformation for supply chain agility and resilience is the need for substantial investment in infrastructure, technology, and human capital (Al-Banna et al., 2023). Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), in particular, may struggle with the financial and technical barriers associated with adopting advanced digital solutions (Alzoubi et al., 2024). Additionally, integrating new digital technologies into existing supply chain networks requires significant organizational change, including upskilling employees, developing new workflows, and managing cybersecurity risks (Alkhatib & Momani, 2023). Resistance to change within organizations and supply chain partnerships can further slow down digital transformation efforts. Companies must therefore adopt a strategic approach by gradually integrating digital solutions, prioritizing high-impact areas, and fostering a culture of digital innovation to ensure successful implementation. The shift towards omnichannel retailing has further accelerated the need for digital transformation in supply chain management. Consumers today expect seamless shopping experiences across online and offline channels, requiring companies to integrate their supply chain processes with digital commerce platforms (Bell et al., 2018; Khan et al., 2024). Advanced analytics, AI-powered recommendation engines, and digital warehousing solutions enable firms to personalize customer experiences while optimizing inventory management and logistics. For example, retailers leverage AI-driven demand forecasting models to predict consumer preferences and adjust their supply chain operations accordingly, ensuring optimal stock levels and minimizing disruptions (Bahrami et al., 2022). Furthermore, the adoption of automated fulfillment centers and drone-based last-mile delivery solutions has improved supply chain agility by reducing delivery lead times and enhancing customer satisfaction. As digital transformation continues to reshape supply chain management, companies must remain agile and adaptive to evolving consumer expectations and market trends. The COVID-19 pandemic served as a major catalyst for digital transformation in supply chain management, exposing vulnerabilities in traditional supply chain models and highlighting the need for greater agility and resilience (Belhadi et al., 2024; Khan et al., 2024). The disruptions caused by lockdowns, border closures, and demand fluctuations forced companies to accelerate their adoption of digital technologies to ensure business continuity. Cloud-based supply chain management platforms enabled remote collaboration between supply chain partners, allowing firms to monitor operations, manage inventory, and coordinate logistics in real time (Al-Banna et al., 2023). AI-powered risk assessment models helped companies identify potential supply chain bottlenecks and develop contingency plans to mitigate disruptions. As businesses recover from the pandemic, digital transformation remains a top priority for enhancing supply chain resilience and preparing for future uncertainties. Looking ahead, the future of supply chain management will be increasingly driven by emerging digital innovations. The rise of AI, machine learning, and quantum computing is expected to further revolutionize supply chain analytics, enabling companies to make highly accurate demand forecasts and optimize supply chain networks with unprecedented precision (Belhadi et al., 2024). The expansion of 5G connectivity will enhance real-time data exchange between supply chain nodes, improving communication and coordination among supply chain partners (De Vass et al., 2021). Additionally, the integration of edge computing with IoT devices will enable decentralized data processing, reducing latency and enhancing decision-making capabilities (Alzoubi et al., 2024). As these technologies continue to evolve, organizations must proactively invest in digital capabilities to stay competitive and resilient in a rapidly changing global landscape. Digital transformation is playing a pivotal role in enhancing supply chain agility and resilience by enabling real-time visibility, data-driven decision-making, automation, and predictive analytics. Businesses that leverage digital technologies such as AI, IoT, blockchain, and big data analytics are better positioned to respond to disruptions, optimize operations, and maintain a competitive edge in dynamic market environments. However, successful digital transformation requires strategic investments, organizational change, and collaboration across supply chain networks. As supply chains continue to face increasing complexity and uncertainty, embracing digital innovation will be essential for ensuring long-term sustainability, efficiency, and adaptability in global supply chain management.

2. Literature Review

The concept of supply chain resilience (SCR) has emerged as an essential consideration for firms seeking to maintain operational continuity in an increasingly dynamic and turbulent global environment. Resilience in the supply chain refers to the capacity of supply chains to adapt to disruptions and bounce back quickly from such shocks, ensuring minimal impact on performance and long-term sustainability (Christopher & Peck, 2004). Given the rapid evolution of technology and its role in transforming the operational landscape, it is crucial to understand the intersection between supply chain resilience, digital technologies, and other dynamic factors such as industry 4.0 capabilities, agility, and sustainability practices (Ivanov, 2022). As the complexity of global supply networks grows, incorporating digital tools such as blockchain, artificial intelligence (AI), and big data analytics can enhance resilience by enabling better risk management, improving decision-making, and fostering innovation (Etemadi, Borbon-Galvez, Strozzi, & Etemadi, 2021). The use of technological innovations such as blockchain and artificial intelligence has significantly advanced the ability of organizations to secure their supply chains from disruptions. Blockchain, for instance, has been identified as a critical tool in mitigating risks associated with fraud, counterfeit goods, and other supply chain inefficiencies by providing greater transparency and traceability (Rejeb & Rejeb, 2020). By enabling real-time data sharing across different nodes in the supply chain, blockchain helps stakeholders to collaborate more effectively and respond promptly to disruptions (Kassa et al., 2023; Rahman et al., 2024). Artificial intelligence (AI) also contributes to supply chain resilience by supporting predictive analytics that can identify potential disruptions before they occur, thus providing firms with the opportunity to mitigate risks proactively (Kassa et al., 2023). Furthermore, AI-driven tools are capable of optimizing supply chain processes such as inventory management, demand forecasting, and transportation, ultimately improving both efficiency and performance (Sarkar, Routroy, & Sultan, 2022). The growing importance of supply chain agility has become evident in the face of global challenges such as the COVID-19 pandemic, which exposed vulnerabilities in supply chains worldwide. The pandemic highlighted the need for agile supply chains that could respond flexibly to changing market conditions, supply disruptions, and fluctuating consumer demand (Herold, Nowicka, Pluta-Zaremba, & Kummer, 2021). Agility, characterized by the ability to quickly adapt to changing circumstances, has been recognized as a critical capability for organizations aiming to maintain competitiveness and ensure continuity in their operations (Dubey, Singh, & Gupta, 2015). The need for agile practices is compounded by the ever-increasing pressures to integrate sustainability into supply chain strategies. Sustainability initiatives, including the reduction of carbon emissions, resource optimization, and waste reduction, are increasingly being integrated into supply chain resilience strategies to promote long-term environmental, social, and economic sustainability (Bag, Telukdarie, Pretorius, & Gupta, 2021). The successful integration of sustainability and resilience has been shown to result in enhanced supply chain performance, reduced vulnerability to disruptions, and improved brand reputation (Chatterjee & Chaudhuri, 2022; Rahman et al., 2024). The role of dynamic capabilities in building supply chain resilience is also significant. Dynamic capabilities, which refer to the ability of organizations to sense opportunities and threats, seize them, and reconfigure resources to maintain competitive advantage, are essential in managing supply chain disruptions (Teece, Pisano, & Shuen, 1997). The concept of dynamic capabilities has been extended to supply chain management, where firms use their capabilities to adapt to changes in market conditions, technology, and supply chain risks (Gupta, Modgil, Gunasekaran, & Bag, 2020). For instance, the integration of digital technologies into the supply chain has been shown to enhance dynamic capabilities by improving the ability to monitor supply chain conditions in real-time, thereby enabling firms to make better-informed decisions and adapt to changing circumstances more quickly (Al-Banna, Rana, Yaqot, & Menezes, 2023). Moreover, digital transformation in supply chains allows organizations to improve collaboration with partners and suppliers, thereby enhancing the overall resilience of the network (Olan, Liu, Suklan, & Jayawickrama, 2022). In the context of supply chain resilience, the role of leadership is another crucial factor. Leadership, particularly transformational leadership, has been identified as a key enabler of resilience, as leaders who foster a culture of innovation and proactive risk management can steer their organizations through periods of uncertainty (Dubey et al., 2015). Leadership plays a pivotal role in developing organizational agility and aligning supply chain strategies with changing market demands, which are essential for maintaining competitiveness (Christopher & Peck, 2004). A resilient supply chain requires leadership that can not only manage risks but also drive innovation through the adoption of new technologies and sustainable practices that allow the organization to navigate disruptions effectively (Salamah, Alzubi, & Yinal, 2023). Supply chain integration, which refers to the coordination and collaboration of various entities within the supply chain, has also been highlighted as a critical factor in enhancing resilience. Integrated supply chains are better equipped to manage disruptions because they allow for faster information flow, reduced lead times, and greater flexibility in adapting to changes in demand or supply (Salvadó, Lauras, & Comes, 2017). Digitalization, which facilitates seamless integration between supply chain partners, is instrumental in building more resilient and responsive supply chains (Oubrahim, Sefiani, & Happonen, 2023). In this sense, the post-COVID-19 era has seen a growing emphasis on integrating digital solutions such as cloud computing, AI, and IoT to enhance coordination and visibility throughout the supply chain (Salamah et al., 2023). As supply chains become more complex and interconnected, managing their resilience through a holistic approach is critical. According to the literature, resilience is not merely about responding to disruptions but also about anticipating risks, building capabilities to mitigate them, and recovering quickly through continuous improvement processes (Ivanov & Dolgui, 2020). The capacity of a supply chain to remain viable in the face of volatility is closely tied to its ability to manage both short-term disruptions and long-term uncertainties (Ivanov, 2022). The integration of sustainability goals with resilience efforts is seen as a strategic move to ensure that supply chains are not only efficient in the short run but also capable of adapting to long-term environmental, economic, and social challenges. As a result, firms are increasingly focusing on sustainable practices as a way to enhance resilience while contributing to broader global sustainability goals (Pagell & Wu, 2009). The intersection of supply chain resilience, digital transformation, and sustainability offers a promising area for future research and practice. The recent advancements in digital technologies such as blockchain, AI, and big data analytics are playing a pivotal role in enhancing the resilience of supply chains, enabling firms to adapt quickly to disruptions, improve efficiency, and foster innovation. The integration of dynamic capabilities, agility, leadership, and sustainability practices further strengthens the resilience of supply chains, making them more competitive in today’s volatile business environment. Understanding the complexities of these interactions is essential for organizations seeking to build resilient and sustainable supply chains that can thrive in the face of future disruptions. Future research should continue to explore the synergies between these factors and how they can be leveraged to build more robust, agile, and sustainable supply chains in the post-pandemic world.

3. Research Methodology

The study employed a quantitative research approach to examine the relationship between supply chain resilience, digital transformation, and sustainability. A structured survey was used to collect primary data from supply chain professionals across various industries. The survey was designed to capture respondents' perspectives on the extent of digital technology adoption, the effectiveness of resilience strategies, and the integration of sustainability practices within their organizations. The questionnaire consisted of multiple sections covering demographic information, technological implementation, resilience capabilities, and sustainability initiatives. To ensure the reliability and validity of the instrument, previously validated measurement scales from existing literature were adapted. The target population for this study included supply chain managers, logistics professionals, procurement officers, and other key stakeholders involved in supply chain decision-making. A purposive sampling technique was employed to select participants who possessed relevant experience and expertise in supply chain management. The sample size consisted of 35 respondents, which was deemed appropriate given the exploratory nature of the study. Participants were identified through professional networks, industry associations, and business forums. The survey was distributed electronically via email and professional social media platforms, allowing respondents to complete it at their convenience. Data collection took place over a period of four weeks to ensure an adequate response rate. Before distribution, a pilot study was conducted with a small subset of participants to refine the questionnaire and eliminate any ambiguities. Based on the feedback received, minor modifications were made to improve clarity and ensure that all questions aligned with the study objectives. Participants were assured of confidentiality, and their responses remained anonymous to encourage honest and unbiased feedback. Once data collection was completed, the responses were screened for completeness and accuracy. Incomplete or inconsistent responses were excluded from the final analysis. The data was then coded and entered into statistical software for analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the demographic characteristics of the respondents, while inferential statistical techniques were applied to test the relationships between the key variables. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was employed as the primary analytical method due to its ability to assess complex relationships between multiple variables simultaneously. Partial least squares (PLS-SEM) was specifically chosen, as it is well-suited for studies with relatively small sample sizes and exploratory research objectives. The approach followed established guidelines for evaluating measurement and structural models, ensuring the robustness of the findings. Ethical considerations were adhered to throughout the research process. Participants were provided with an informed consent form detailing the purpose of the study, their voluntary participation, and their right to withdraw at any stage. No personally identifiable information was collected, and all data was securely stored and used solely for academic purposes. The study maintained transparency in its methodology, ensuring that the research process was rigorous, reliable, and aligned with ethical research practices.

4. Results

The analysis of the data collected from the survey revealed several critical insights regarding the interplay between digital transformation, supply chain resilience, and sustainability. The responses from the 35 participants provided a robust foundation for understanding how organizations navigate the complexities of modern supply chain environments. Participants represented various industries, including manufacturing, retail, logistics, and technology, which contributed to a diverse range of perspectives and experiences. Descriptive statistics indicated that a significant proportion of the respondents had a substantial level of experience in supply chain management, with an average of over 10 years in the field. This experience provided them with a comprehensive understanding of the challenges and opportunities presented by digital technologies. The demographics of the sample revealed a balanced representation of roles within supply chains, including managers, analysts, and operational staff, thus ensuring that multiple facets of supply chain functions were considered in the analysis. One of the key findings from the data was the prevalent adoption of digital technologies across the surveyed organizations. A majority of respondents reported utilizing technologies such as cloud computing, Internet of Things (IoT), artificial intelligence, and big data analytics to enhance their supply chain operations. The analysis indicated that organizations that embraced these technologies experienced improved visibility, real-time data access, and greater responsiveness to market changes. Participants noted that the integration of these technologies facilitated more informed decision-making processes and enhanced collaboration across supply chain partners. Moreover, the results highlighted a strong correlation between digital transformation initiatives and enhanced supply chain resilience. Respondents indicated that organizations investing in digital tools and technologies were better equipped to adapt to disruptions, whether they arose from natural disasters, geopolitical tensions, or global pandemics. The ability to quickly access and analyze data allowed supply chains to respond effectively to unexpected challenges, minimizing operational downtime and maintaining service levels. Participants expressed that digital transformation enabled them to develop contingency plans that were more robust, as data-driven insights helped identify potential vulnerabilities within the supply chain. The analysis also underscored the significance of leadership commitment in driving digital transformation and resilience initiatives. Respondents who indicated strong leadership support for technology adoption reported more substantial improvements in their supply chain performance metrics. This finding suggests that organizations where leaders prioritize digital transformation are more likely to cultivate a culture of innovation, fostering an environment conducive to agility and resilience. Another critical theme that emerged from the data was the relationship between supply chain resilience and sustainability practices. Participants indicated that the pursuit of resilience often aligned with sustainability goals, leading to a more holistic approach to supply chain management. Many organizations recognized that adopting sustainable practices not only mitigated risks but also enhanced their reputation and brand value. Respondents mentioned that sustainable supply chain practices, such as ethical sourcing, waste reduction, and energy-efficient logistics, were increasingly prioritized by customers and stakeholders. Furthermore, the study revealed that organizations implementing sustainability initiatives experienced improved operational efficiency. Participants noted that integrating sustainability into their supply chain strategies often resulted in cost savings, particularly through waste reduction and energy management. The data indicated that firms embracing sustainability as a core value were better positioned to attract and retain customers who prioritize corporate social responsibility. In addition to examining the relationships among digital transformation, resilience, and sustainability, the analysis explored the challenges organizations faced during the implementation of digital technologies. Respondents identified several barriers, including resistance to change among employees, inadequate training, and the high costs associated with technology adoption. Many participants emphasized the need for comprehensive training programs to equip staff with the necessary skills to leverage digital tools effectively. The results suggested that organizations that invested in employee development were more successful in their digital transformation journeys. Another notable finding was the importance of collaboration within supply chains. Respondents highlighted that fostering strong relationships with suppliers and customers was essential for achieving resilience and sustainability. Collaborative efforts allowed organizations to share resources, information, and best practices, ultimately enhancing the overall performance of the supply chain. The data revealed that participants engaged in collaborative planning, forecasting, and inventory management with their partners, which contributed to better alignment and coordination across the supply chain. The analysis further examined the role of external factors in shaping supply chain strategies. Many respondents indicated that regulatory pressures and market demands influenced their decisions regarding digital transformation and sustainability initiatives. Participants noted that compliance with environmental regulations often prompted organizations to adopt more sustainable practices, while market competition drove the need for greater agility and responsiveness. The findings suggest that external pressures can serve as catalysts for change, pushing organizations to innovate and adapt. In exploring the quantitative relationships among the variables, structural equation modeling (SEM) provided insights into the interconnectedness of digital transformation, supply chain resilience, and sustainability. The results demonstrated a positive path coefficient between digital transformation and supply chain resilience, indicating that organizations that actively pursued digital initiatives were more likely to exhibit resilient behaviors. Additionally, the analysis showed that supply chain resilience positively influenced sustainability practices, suggesting that organizations that developed resilience were better positioned to implement sustainable strategies. The study also explored the moderating effects of factors such as industry type and organizational size on the relationships between digital transformation, resilience, and sustainability. The findings indicated that the impact of digital transformation on resilience was more pronounced in industries characterized by rapid technological advancements, such as technology and consumer electronics. Conversely, organizations in traditional sectors, such as manufacturing and agriculture, faced unique challenges in leveraging digital technologies, primarily due to legacy systems and resistance to change. In terms of organizational size, the results revealed that larger firms tended to have more resources available for technology adoption and employee training, which contributed to their success in digital transformation efforts. However, smaller organizations demonstrated agility and adaptability that allowed them to respond quickly to changes in the market, often leveraging niche technologies tailored to their specific needs. This finding highlights the importance of recognizing the diverse approaches organizations take in their digital transformation journeys, influenced by their unique characteristics and contexts. The study also examined the temporal dimension of digital transformation and resilience. Respondents indicated that the COVID-19 pandemic served as a significant turning point in their digital transformation efforts. Many organizations accelerated their adoption of digital technologies in response to the challenges posed by the pandemic, leading to rapid changes in supply chain operations. Participants noted that the lessons learned during this period influenced their long-term strategies, with a renewed focus on building resilience and sustainability into their supply chain frameworks.
Table 1. Digital Transformation Adoption.
Table 1. Digital Transformation Adoption.
Theme Description
Technology Integration Use of digital tools like AI, IoT, and blockchain
Data Access and Visibility Real-time data availability across the supply chain
Cloud Computing and AI Integration of cloud systems and artificial intelligence
Big Data Analytics Utilization of big data for decision making
Operational Efficiency Improvements in performance and optimization due to technology
The data highlights a significant uptake of advanced technologies such as AI, IoT, and blockchain across the organizations studied. A majority of respondents emphasized how digital tools enabled increased operational efficiency, reduced costs, and provided real-time visibility of their supply chain activities. Cloud computing and big data analytics played a central role in enabling organizations to gain actionable insights, allowing them to make better-informed decisions. As organizations increasingly embrace digital transformation, they enhance their capacity to respond to disruptions and improve overall supply chain agility.
Table 2. Supply Chain Resilience Factors.
Table 2. Supply Chain Resilience Factors.
Theme Description
Flexibility and Agility Ability to adjust to unforeseen disruptions
Data-Driven Decision Making Leveraging data for quick response and recovery
Contingency Planning Developing risk management strategies
Supplier Relationships Collaboration with suppliers to ensure continuity
Crisis Management Capability Preparedness and capacity to handle crises
The research reveals that resilience in the supply chain is strongly influenced by flexibility and agility. Organizations that prioritized digital transformation had a better ability to adapt to disruptions, leveraging data for quick decision-making. Developing contingency plans became a crucial strategy for handling unexpected events. Additionally, strong relationships with suppliers were identified as key to ensuring continuity and overcoming disruptions, allowing for faster recovery. This indicates a shift towards proactive resilience strategies, where organizations are prepared for crises rather than simply reacting to them.
Table 3. Sustainability Practices in Supply Chain.
Table 3. Sustainability Practices in Supply Chain.
Theme Description
Ethical Sourcing Ensuring products are sourced responsibly
Waste Reduction Minimizing waste in processes and logistics
Carbon Footprint Reduction Efforts to reduce environmental impact
Circular Economy Implementing closed-loop supply chain practices
Sustainability Metrics Measurement and monitoring of sustainability efforts
Sustainability practices have become an integral part of supply chain strategies. Respondents revealed that a large number of organizations were focused on ethical sourcing and waste reduction efforts. Many participants also highlighted initiatives aimed at reducing the carbon footprint, such as using energy-efficient logistics. The circular economy approach was increasingly adopted, with companies rethinking product life cycles and resource use to minimize waste. Furthermore, measuring and monitoring sustainability metrics was emphasized as crucial in tracking progress and aligning with environmental goals.
Table 4. Organizational Leadership and Digital Transformation.
Table 4. Organizational Leadership and Digital Transformation.
Theme Description
Leadership Support Commitment from top management for digital initiatives
Strategic Vision Clear alignment of digital transformation with business goals
Employee Engagement Involvement of employees in digital initiatives
Change Management Support for adapting to digital change within the organization
Innovation Culture Promotion of a culture that encourages new technology
A strong link between leadership commitment and the successful adoption of digital transformation was identified in the study. Organizations where leadership was fully invested in digital initiatives were able to clearly align these efforts with their broader strategic goals. Employee engagement was also crucial, with companies actively involving their staff in the transition to new technologies. The presence of an effective change management process ensured smoother transitions, while cultivating an innovation-oriented culture enabled ongoing adaptation and integration of digital tools to meet emerging challenges.
Table 5. Barriers to Digital Transformation.
Table 5. Barriers to Digital Transformation.
Theme Description
Resistance to Change Hesitance or reluctance from staff or stakeholders
High Initial Investment Significant upfront costs for technology adoption
Skills Gap Lack of necessary digital skills within the workforce
Integration with Legacy Systems Challenges in integrating new technology with old infrastructure
Cybersecurity Concerns Risks associated with digital systems and data security
The research uncovered several obstacles organizations faced in their journey toward digital transformation. Resistance to change emerged as a significant barrier, especially when employees were unsure about the benefits of new technologies. Additionally, the initial investment required to adopt advanced digital solutions was seen as prohibitive by some organizations. A lack of skilled workforce, capable of managing and operating digital tools, was also identified as a constraint. Legacy systems posed another challenge, as integrating new technologies with old infrastructure often resulted in compatibility issues. Furthermore, cybersecurity concerns remained a critical issue for many organizations, with the fear of data breaches or system failures hindering their willingness to fully embrace digitalization.
Table 6. Supply Chain Collaboration and Performance.
Table 6. Supply Chain Collaboration and Performance.
Theme Description
Collaborative Planning Joint planning efforts with suppliers and customers
Information Sharing Open exchange of supply chain data across partners
Joint Forecasting Collaborative demand and inventory forecasting
Trust and Transparency Establishing trust among supply chain partners
Performance Metrics Shared performance metrics to align goals
Effective collaboration among supply chain partners was seen as vital to achieving improved performance. The research indicated that joint planning, information sharing, and collaborative forecasting helped align the efforts of all parties involved. This led to greater efficiency and reduced the likelihood of disruptions. Trust and transparency were found to be key enablers of successful collaboration, allowing partners to work together seamlessly. Furthermore, establishing shared performance metrics helped align organizational goals, fostering stronger, more productive partnerships that improved overall supply chain outcomes.
The findings of this study highlight several key themes that influence modern supply chain practices, particularly in the context of digital transformation, resilience, sustainability, and collaboration. The adoption of advanced technologies, such as artificial intelligence, blockchain, and cloud computing, emerged as a primary factor driving improvements in operational efficiency, data access, and visibility across supply chains. Organizations that embraced digital tools were better equipped to respond to disruptions, with real-time data and analytics facilitating faster decision-making and recovery. A strong emphasis was placed on the role of leadership in enabling digital transformation, with top management support, strategic alignment, and fostering an innovation-driven culture being crucial to successful technology adoption. Resilience, both in terms of flexibility and agility, was another prominent finding. Companies with robust contingency plans and strong supplier relationships were better prepared for unforeseen disruptions, enhancing their capacity to recover swiftly. The study also revealed the growing importance of sustainability in supply chain strategies. Ethical sourcing, waste reduction, and efforts to minimize the carbon footprint were central to many organizations' initiatives, with a marked increase in the adoption of circular economy practices. Additionally, the ability to measure and monitor sustainability efforts was recognized as essential to ensuring long-term environmental goals. Despite the progress, several barriers to digital transformation were identified, including resistance to change, high initial investments, and the skills gap within the workforce. The integration of new technologies with legacy systems posed challenges for many organizations, and concerns around cybersecurity remained a significant obstacle. Furthermore, collaboration across supply chain partners was found to be crucial for improving performance. Effective communication, joint planning, and shared performance metrics enabled organizations to align their goals and optimize supply chain operations. The study underscores the importance of leadership, technology, and collaboration in enhancing the efficiency, resilience, and sustainability of modern supply chains.

5. Discussion

The results of this study provide a comprehensive understanding of the multifaceted role that digital transformation plays in enhancing supply chain agility and resilience. One significant aspect of the findings is the crucial relationship between technology adoption and supply chain performance. Organizations that have embraced advanced technologies such as artificial intelligence, blockchain, and big data analytics are demonstrating improved operational efficiency and responsiveness to market dynamics. This technological adoption facilitates real-time data access, allowing companies to make informed decisions quickly and respond effectively to disruptions. Consequently, the study emphasizes that digital transformation is not merely an operational enhancement but a strategic necessity that underpins competitive advantage in today's rapidly changing business environment. Additionally, the findings highlight the importance of leadership in driving successful digital transformation initiatives. Strong leadership fosters a culture of innovation and adaptability, enabling organizations to embrace new technologies and integrate them into existing processes. Leaders who prioritize digital initiatives can create a shared vision among stakeholders, aligning organizational goals with the broader strategic objectives of enhancing supply chain resilience. This leadership engagement is vital in overcoming resistance to change, addressing skill gaps, and ensuring that employees are equipped with the necessary competencies to leverage digital tools effectively. Furthermore, the theme of sustainability emerged prominently within the findings, showcasing a growing recognition among organizations of the need to incorporate sustainable practices into supply chain operations. The findings suggest that companies are increasingly focused on ethical sourcing, waste reduction, and minimizing their environmental impact, driven by both regulatory requirements and consumer demand for sustainable products. This shift towards sustainability aligns with the broader societal trends emphasizing corporate social responsibility, where organizations are held accountable for their environmental footprint. As such, the integration of sustainability into supply chain strategies is not only a moral imperative but also a critical driver of long-term value creation. The study also reveals that collaboration is paramount in optimizing supply chain performance. The interconnected nature of global supply chains necessitates effective communication and joint planning among partners to achieve shared objectives. Organizations that foster strong collaborative relationships with suppliers, customers, and other stakeholders can navigate complexities more effectively and enhance their collective resilience. This collaborative approach is particularly significant in the context of disruptions, where shared information and resources can facilitate quicker recovery and minimize the impact of unforeseen events. However, despite the promising findings, several challenges remain in the journey toward digital transformation and supply chain resilience. Resistance to change and the complexities associated with integrating new technologies into existing systems can hinder progress. Additionally, concerns around cybersecurity and data privacy pose significant risks that organizations must address to protect sensitive information and maintain stakeholder trust. The findings highlight the necessity for organizations to adopt a holistic approach to digital transformation, one that encompasses not only technological advancements but also organizational culture, leadership commitment, and strategic alignment. In summary, the discussion elucidates the interconnected themes of technology adoption, leadership, sustainability, and collaboration as critical components in enhancing supply chain agility and resilience. Organizations that proactively address these dimensions are better positioned to thrive in an increasingly volatile and competitive landscape, ultimately achieving greater operational effectiveness and long-term success.

6. Conclusion

This study underscores the vital role of digital transformation in enhancing supply chain agility and resilience within today's dynamic business environment. The findings reveal that organizations that effectively leverage advanced technologies can significantly improve their operational efficiency, responsiveness to market changes, and overall performance. Additionally, the study highlights the importance of strong leadership in driving digital initiatives, fostering a culture of innovation, and aligning organizational goals with strategic objectives. This leadership commitment is essential for overcoming the challenges associated with change management and ensuring that employees are equipped to utilize new technologies effectively. Furthermore, the emphasis on sustainability within supply chain practices reflects a broader societal shift towards responsible corporate behavior. Organizations are increasingly recognizing the need to integrate sustainable practices into their operations, driven by both consumer expectations and regulatory pressures. This alignment with sustainability not only enhances corporate reputation but also contributes to long-term value creation. Collaboration among supply chain partners emerges as another critical theme, facilitating shared information and resources that are essential for navigating complexities and uncertainties. By fostering strong relationships and effective communication, organizations can enhance their collective resilience and optimize performance in the face of disruptions. Despite the challenges identified, such as resistance to change, cybersecurity concerns, and the integration of legacy systems with new technologies, the study emphasizes that a holistic approach to digital transformation is necessary. Organizations must consider not only technological advancements but also organizational culture, leadership commitment, and strategic alignment to achieve lasting improvements in supply chain agility and resilience. Overall, this research provides valuable insights for practitioners and scholars alike, highlighting the interconnectedness of technology, leadership, sustainability, and collaboration in building robust and adaptable supply chains in the 21st century.

References

  1. Al-Banna, A., Rana, Z. A., Yaqot, M., & Menezes, B. (2023). Interconnectedness between supply chain resilience, Industry 4.0, and investment. Logistics, 7(3), 50. [CrossRef]
  2. Alfalla-Luque, R. , Luján García, D. E., & Marin-Garcia, J. A. (2023). Supply chain agility and performance: Evidence from a meta-analysis. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 43(10), 1587–1633. [CrossRef]
  3. Ali, A. A. A. , Sharabati, A.-A. A., Allahham, M., & Nasereddin, A. Y. (2024). The relationship between supply chain resilience and digital supply chain and the impact on sustainability: Supply chain dynamism as a moderator. Sustainability, 16(7), 3082. [CrossRef]
  4. Alkhatib, S. F. , & Momani, R. A. (2023). Supply chain resilience and operational performance: The role of digital technologies in Jordanian manufacturing firms. Administrative Sciences, 13(1), 40. [CrossRef]
  5. Alzoubi, H. M. , Alshurideh, M., & Dawood, M. (2024). Navigating the interplay between innovation orientation, dynamic capabilities, and digital supply chain optimization: Empirical insights from SMEs. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 12(1), 649–658. [CrossRef]
  6. Aslam, H. , Blome, C., Roscoe, S., & Azhar, T. M. (2020). Determining the antecedents of dynamic supply chain capabilities. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 25(4), 427–442. [CrossRef]
  7. Bag, S. , Telukdarie, A., Pretorius, J. H. C., & Gupta, S. (2021). Industry 4.0 and supply chain sustainability: Framework and future research directions. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 28(5), 1410–1450. [CrossRef]
  8. Emon, M. M. H. , & Khan, T. (2024). Unlocking Sustainability through Supply Chain Visibility: Insights from the Manufacturing Sector of Bangladesh. Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(4), 2194. [CrossRef]
  9. Khan, T. , & Emon, M. M. H. (2024). Exploring the Potential of the Blue Economy: A Systematic Review of Strategies for Enhancing International Business in Bangladesh in the context of Indo-Pacific Region. Review of Business and Economics Studies, 12(2), 55–73. [CrossRef]
  10. Bahrami, M. , Shokouhyar, S., & Seifian, A. (2022). Big data analytics capability and supply chain performance: The mediating roles of supply chain resilience and innovation. Modern Supply Chain Research and Applications, 4(1), 62–84. [CrossRef]
  11. Belhadi, A. , Mani, V., Kamble, S. S., Khan, S. A. R., & Verma, S. (2024). Artificial intelligence-driven innovation for enhancing supply chain resilience and performance under the effect of supply chain dynamism: An empirical investigation. Annals of Operations Research, 333, 627–652. [CrossRef]
  12. Belhadi, A. , Mani, V., Kamble, S. S., Khan, S. A. R., & Verma, S. (2024). Artificial intelligence-driven innovation for enhancing supply chain resilience and performance under the effect of supply chain dynamism: An empirical investigation. Annals of Operations Research, 333, 627–652. [CrossRef]
  13. Emon, M. M. H. , Khan, T., Rahman, M. A., Hamid, A. B. A., & Yaakub, N. I. (2025). GreenTech Revolution: Navigating Challenges and Seizing Opportunities. In AI and Green Technology Applications in Society (pp. 63–90). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. [CrossRef]
  14. Khan, T., Emon, M. M. H., & Rahman, M. A. (2024). A systematic review on exploring the influence of Industry 4.0 technologies to enhance supply chain visibility and operational efficiency. Review of Business and Economics Studies, 12(3), 6–27. [CrossRef]
  15. Bell, D. R. , Gallino, S., & Moreno, A. (2018). Offline showrooms in omnichannel retail: Demand and operational benefits. Management Science, 64(4), 1629–1651. [CrossRef]
  16. Bischoff, O. , & Seuring, S. (2021). Opportunities and limitations of public blockchain-based supply chain traceability. Modern Supply Chain Research and Applications, 3(3), 226–243. [CrossRef]
  17. Chatterjee, S. , & Chaudhuri, R. (2022). Supply chain sustainability during turbulent environment: Examining the role of firm capabilities and government regulation. Operations Management Research, 15(3–4), 1081–1095. [CrossRef]
  18. Chowdhury, M. M. H. , & Quaddus, M. A. (2021). Supply chain sustainability practices and governance for mitigating sustainability risk and improving market performance: A dynamic capability perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 278, 123521. [CrossRef]
  19. Emon, M. M. H. , Khan, T., Rahman, M. A., & Siam, S. A. J. (2024). Factors Influencing the Usage of Artificial Intelligence among Bangladeshi Professionals: Mediating role of Attitude Towards the Technology. 2024 IEEE International Conference on Computing, Applications and Systems (COMPAS), 1–7. [CrossRef]
  20. Khan, T. , Emon, M. M. H., Rahman, M. A., Hamid, A. B. A., & Yaakub, N. I. (2025). Bridging the Gap: Realizing GreenTech Potential. In AI and Green Technology Applications in Society (pp. 91–122). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. [CrossRef]
  21. Christopher, M., & Peck, H. (2004). Building the resilient supply chain. International Journal of Logistics Management, 15(2), 1–14. [CrossRef]
  22. De Vass, T. , Shee, H., & Miah, S. J. (2021). IoT in supply chain management: A narrative on retail sector sustainability. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 24(6), 605–624. [CrossRef]
  23. Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J., Roubaud, D., Fosso Wamba, S., Giannakis, M., & Foropon, C. (2019). Big data analytics and organizational culture as complements to swift trust and collaborative performance in the humanitarian supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 210, 120–136. [CrossRef]
  24. Dubey, R. , Singh, T., & Gupta, O. K. (2015). Impact of agility, adaptability and alignment on humanitarian logistics performance: Mediating effect of leadership. Global Business Review, 16(5), 812–831. [CrossRef]
  25. Khan, T. , & Emon, M. M. H. (2025). Supply chain performance in the age of Industry 4.0: evidence from manufacturing sector. Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22(1), 2434. [CrossRef]
  26. Etemadi, N. , Borbon-Galvez, Y., Strozzi, F., & Etemadi, T. (2021). Supply chain disruption risk management with blockchain: A dynamic literature review. Information, 12(2), 70. [CrossRef]
  27. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. [CrossRef]
  28. Gupta, S. , Modgil, S., Gunasekaran, A., & Bag, S. (2020). Dynamic capabilities and institutional theories for Industry 4.0 and digital supply chain. Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal, 21(3), 139–157. [CrossRef]
  29. Hair, J. F. , Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications.
  30. Herold, D. M. , Nowicka, K., Pluta-Zaremba, A., & Kummer, S. (2021). COVID-19 and the pursuit of supply chain resilience: Reactions and “lessons learned” from logistics service providers (LSPs). Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 26(6), 702–714. [CrossRef]
  31. Ivanov, D. (2022). Viable supply chain model: Integrating agility, resilience, and sustainability perspectives—Lessons from and thinking beyond the COVID-19 pandemic. Annals of Operations Research, 319(1), 1411–1431. [CrossRef]
  32. Ivanov, D. , & Dolgui, A. (2020). Viability of intertwined supply networks: Extending the supply chain resilience angles towards survivability. A position paper motivated by COVID-19 outbreak. International Journal of Production Research, 58(10), 2904–2915. [CrossRef]
  33. Kassa, A. , Kitaw, D., Stache, U., & Beshah, B. (2023). Artificial intelligence techniques for enhancing supply chain resilience: A systematic literature review, holistic framework, and future research. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 186, 109714. [CrossRef]
  34. Kim, J. S., & Shin, N. (2019). The impact of blockchain technology application on supply chain partnership and performance. Sustainability, 11(21), 6181. [CrossRef]
  35. Kunz, N. , & Gold, S. (2017). Sustainable humanitarian supply chain management–Exploring new theory. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 20(2), 85–104. [CrossRef]
  36. Khan, T. , Emon, M. M. H., & Rahman, S. (2024). Marketing Strategy Innovation via AI Adoption: A Study on Bangladeshi SMEs in the Context of Industry 5.0. 2024 6th International Conference on Sustainable Technologies for Industry 5.0 (STI), 1-6.
  37. Khan, T. , Emon, M. M. H., & Nath, A. (2024). Quantifying the Effects of AI-Driven Inventory Management on Operational Efficiency in Online Retail. 2024 27th International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT), 1-6.
  38. Nakabuye, Z. , Mayanja, J., Bimbona, S., & Wassermann, M. (2023). Technology orientation and export performance: The moderating role of supply chain agility. Modern Supply Chain Research and Applications, 5(3), 230–264. [CrossRef]
  39. Nandi, M. L. , Nandi, S., Moya, H., & Kaynak, H. (2020). Blockchain technology-enabled supply chain systems and supply chain performance: A resource-based view. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 25(6), 841–862. [CrossRef]
  40. Negri, M. , Cagno, E., Colicchia, C., & Sarkis, J. (2021). Integrating sustainability and resilience in the supply chain: A systematic literature review and a research agenda. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(7), 2858–2886. [CrossRef]
  41. Nwagwu, U., Niaz, M., Chukwu, M. U., & Saddique, F. (2023). The influence of artificial intelligence on enhancing supply chain performance under the mediating significance of supply chain collaboration in manufacturing and logistics organizations in Pakistan. Traditional Journal of Multidisciplinary Science, 1(1), 29–40.
  42. Olan, F., Liu, S., Suklan, J., & Jayawickrama, U. (2022). The role of artificial intelligence networks in sustainable supply chain finance for food and drink industry. International Journal of Production Research, 60(14), 4418–4433. [CrossRef]
  43. Oubrahim, I. , Sefiani, N., & Happonen, A. (2023). The influence of digital transformation and supply chain integration on overall sustainable supply chain performance: An empirical analysis from manufacturing companies in Morocco. Energies, 16(2), 1004. [CrossRef]
  44. Rahman, M. A. , Emon, M. M. H., Khan, T., & Siam, S. A. J. (2024). Measuring the Influence of Brand Image on Consumer Behavioral Intentions by using AI: Exploring the Mediating Role of Trust. 2024 IEEE International Conference on Computing, Applications and Systems (COMPAS), 1–7. [CrossRef]
  45. Rahman, M. A. , Emon, M. M. H., Khan, T., Hamid, A. B. A., & Yaakub, N. I. (2024). Eco-Intelligence. In AI and Green Technology Applications in Society (pp. 31–62). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. [CrossRef]
  46. Pagell, M., & Wu, Z. (2009). Building a more complete theory of sustainable supply chain management using case studies of 10 exemplars. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 45(2), 37–56. [CrossRef]
  47. Purnomo, H. , Okarda, B., Dermawan, A., Ilham, Q. P., Pacheco, P., Nurfatriani, F., & Suhendang, E. (2020). Reconciling oil palm economic development and environmental conservation in Indonesia: A value chain dynamic approach. Forest Policy and Economics, 111, 102089. [CrossRef]
  48. Rahman, M. S. , Gani, M. O., Fatema, B., & Takahashi, Y. (2023). B2B firms’ supply chain resilience orientation in achieving sustainable supply chain performance. Sustainable Manufacturing and Service Economics, 2, 100011. [CrossRef]
  49. Rejeb, A., & Rejeb, K. (2020). Blockchain and supply chain sustainability. Logforum, 16(3), 363–372. [CrossRef]
  50. Roy, S., Das, M., Ali, S. M., Raihan, A. S., Paul, S. K., & Kabir, G. (2020). Evaluating strategies for environmental sustainability in a supply chain of an emerging economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 262, 121389. [CrossRef]
  51. Salamah, E. , Alzubi, A., & Yinal, A. (2023). Unveiling the impact of digitalization on supply chain performance in the post-COVID-19 era: The mediating role of supply chain integration and efficiency. Sustainability, 16(1), 304. [CrossRef]
  52. Salvadó, L. L., Lauras, M., & Comes, T. (2017). Sustainable performance measurement for humanitarian supply chain operations. In Proceedings of the International ISCRAM Conference, Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management (pp. 775–783).
  53. Sarkar, A. , Routroy, S., & Sultan, F. A. (2022). The impact of co-creation and co-invention in supply chains: A bibliometric review. Arab Gulf Journal of Scientific Research, 40(4), 364–391. [CrossRef]
  54. Spieske, A. , & Birkel, H. (2021). Improving supply chain resilience through Industry 4.0: A systematic literature review under the impressions of the COVID-19 pandemic. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 158, 107452. [CrossRef]
  55. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. [CrossRef]
  56. Vanichchinchai, A. (2019). The effect of lean manufacturing on a supply chain relationship and performance. Sustainability, 11(20), 5751. [CrossRef]
  57. Wamba, S. F. , Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., & Akter, S. (2020). The performance effects of big data analytics and supply chain ambidexterity: The moderating effect of environmental dynamism. International Journal of Production Economics, 222, 107498. [CrossRef]
  58. Yu, W. , Jacobs, M. A., Chavez, R., & Yang, J. (2019). Dynamism, disruption orientation, and resilience in the supply chain and the impacts on financial performance: A dynamic capabilities perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 218, 352–362. [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated