Submitted:
27 January 2025
Posted:
28 January 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Ibrahim, A.D.; Rabah, A.B.; Ibrahim, M.L.; Magami, I.M.; Isah J.G.; Muzoh, O.I. Bacteriological and chemical properties of soil amended with fermented poultry bird feather. Int J Biol Chem Sci 2014 Vol. 8(3), 1243–1248. [CrossRef]
- Schmidt, WF. Innovative feather utilization strategies. In: Proceedings national poultry waste management symposium. Auburn University Printing Services 1998 19–22.
- Joardar, J.C.; Rahman, M.M. Poultry feather waste management and effects on plant growth. International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture, 2018 Vol.7(7), 183–188. [CrossRef]
- Lasekan, A.; Bakar, A.F.; Hashim, D. Potential of chicken by-products as sources of useful biological resources. Waste Manag. 2013; 33(3):552–565. [CrossRef]
- Pal, A.; Adhikary, R.; Bera, M.; Krishiviswavidyala, B. C.; & Bengal, W. Application of Different Geotextile in Soil to Improve the Soil Health in Humid and Hot Sub Humid Region of West Bengal , India Application of Different Geotextile in Soil to Improve the Soil Health in Humid and Hot Sub Humid Region of West Bengal, India. Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci. 2020 9(6), 2812–2818. [CrossRef]
- Mitchell, D.J.; Barton, A.P.; Fullen, M.A.; Hocking, T.J., Wu Bo, Z.; Zheng, Y. Field studies of the effects of jute geotextiles on runoff and erosion in Shropshire, UK. Soil Use and Management 2003 19(2), 182-184.
- Pritchard, M.; Sarsby, R.W.; Anand, S.C. Textiles in civil engineering. Part 2- natural fibre geotextiles, [In:] A.R. Horrocks, S.C. Anand (Eds.), Handbook of Technical Textiles, Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, England, 2000 pp.372-405. [CrossRef]
- Sarkar, T.; Perween, T.; & Datta, P. Assessing the Effect of Geotextile Mulch on Yield and Physico-Chemical Qualities of Litchi . A New Technical Approach. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 2019 8(07), 1984–1989. [CrossRef]
- Slezak, R.; Krzystek, L.; Puchalski, M.; Krucińska, I. Sitarski, A. Degradation of bio-based film plastics in soil under natural conditions. Science of The Total Environment 2023, Vol. 866, 25, 161401. [CrossRef]
- Emadian, S.M.; Onay, T.T.; Demirel, B. Biodegradation of bioplastics in natural environments. Waste Manag. 2017 Vol. 36 , pp. 576-583. [CrossRef]
- Briassoulis, D.; Mistriotis, A. Key parameters in testing biodegradation of bio-based materials in soil. Chemosphere, 2018 Vol. 207, pp. 18-26. [CrossRef]
- Camacho Muñoz, R.; Villada Castillo, H.S.; Hoyos Concha, J.L.; Solanilla Duque, J.F. Aerobic biodegradation of poly(lactic acid) (PLA) in thermoplastic starch (TPS) blends in soil induced by gelatin. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 2024, Vol. 193, 105831. [CrossRef]
- Smith, S.; Ozturk, M.; Frey, M. Soil biodegradation of cotton fabrics treated with common finishes. Cellulose 2021 Vol. 28, 4485–4494. [CrossRef]
- Jóźwik-Pruska, J.; Wrześniewska-Tosik, K.; Mik, T.; Wesołowska, E.; Kowalewski, T.; Pałczyńska, M.; Walisiak, D.; Szalczyńska, M. Biodegradable nonwovens with poultry feather addition as a 2 way of recycling and waste management. Polymers 2022 14 (12), 2370. [CrossRef]
- Rudnik, E.; Briassoulis, D. Degradation behaviour of poly(lactic acid) films and fibres in soil under Mediterranean field conditions and laboratory simulations testing. Industrial Crops and Products 2011 Vol. 33 (3), 648-658. [CrossRef]
- Chuensangjun, C.; Pechyen, C.; Sirisansaneeyakul, S. Degradation Behaviors of Different Blends of Polylactic Acid Buried in Soil. Energy Procedia. 2013 Vol. 34, 73-82. [CrossRef]
- Tsuji, H. Poly (lactic acid). Bio-based plastics: materials and applications 2013 171-239. [CrossRef]
- Zaaba, N.F.; Jaafar, M. A review on degradation mechanisms of polylactic acid: Hydrolytic, photodegradative, microbial, and enzymatic degradation. Polym Eng Sci. 2020 60, 2061–2075. [CrossRef]
- Tokiwa, Y.; Calabia, B.P. Biodegradability and biodegradation of poly(lactide). Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2006 Vol. 72, 2, 244-51. [CrossRef]
- Khabbaz, F.; Karlsson, S.; Albertsson, A.-C. PY-GC/MS an effective technique to characterizing of degradation mechanism of poly (L-lactide) in the different environment. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2000 Vol.78, 2369-2378. [CrossRef]
- Nowak, B.; Pająk, J. Biodegradacja polilaktydu (PLA). Archiwum Gospodarki Odpadami i Ochrony Środowiska 2010 Vol. 2, 1-10, ISSN 1733-4381 in polish.
- Karamanlioglu, M.; Robson, G.D. The influence of biotic and abiotic factors on the rate of degradation of poly(lactic) acid (PLA) coupons buried in compost and soil. Polymer Degradation and Stability 2013 Vol.98, 2063-2071. [CrossRef]
- Jarerat, A.; Tokiwa, Y. Poly(L-lactide) degradation by Saccharothrix waywayandensis. Biotechnol Lett. 2003 Vol.25, 1, 401-404. [CrossRef]
- Artham, T.; Doble, M. Biodegradation of aliphatic and aromatic polycarbonates. Macromol. Biosci. 2008 Vol.8, 1, 14-24. [CrossRef]
- Krawczyk-Walach, M.; Gzyra-Jagieła, K.; Milczarek, A.; Jóźwik-Pruska, J. Characterization of Potential Pollutants from Poly(lactic acid) after the Degradation Process in Soil under Simulated Environmental Conditions. AppliedChem. 2021 Vol.1, 156-172. [CrossRef]
- Mwasha, A. Using environmentally friendly geotextiles for soil reinforcement: A parametric study. Materials & Design. 2009 Vol. 30(5), 1798-1803. [CrossRef]
- Kacorzyk, P.; Strojny, J.; Białczyk, B. The Impact of Biodegradable Geotextiles on the Effect of Sodding of Difficult Terrain. Sustainability 2021, Vol. 13(11), 5828. [CrossRef]








| Nonwoven | Biodegradation degree, % ± SD | Composition, % | Basic weight, g/m2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cotton | PLA | feather | |||
| PLA_0.1 | 1.51±0.46 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 106 |
| PLA_0.2 | 0.622±0.325 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 140 |
| PLA_1 | 40.30±2.73 | 0 | 63 | 37 | 169 |
| PLA_2 | 26.0±1.93 | 0 | 69 | 31 | 202 |
| PLA_3 | 23.6±5.8 | 0 | 71 | 29 | 197 |
| PLA_4 | 23.4±1.74 | 0 | 75 | 25 | 186 |
| PLA.C_0.1 | 54.0±1.40 | 50 | 50 | 0 | 106 |
| PLA.C_0.2 | 41.8±1.16 | 50 | 50 | 0 | 122 |
| PLA.C_1 | 70.8±6.37 | 32.5 | 32.5 | 35 | 153 |
| PLA.C_2 | 67.6±2.57 | 35 | 35 | 30 | 147 |
| PLA.C_3 | 59.6±2.84 | 35.5 | 35.5 | 29 | 141 |
| PLA.C_4 | 59.9±1.23 | 40 | 40 | 20 | 152 |
| PLA.C_5 | 62.7±1.21 | 42 | 42 | 16 | 146 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).