Submitted:
16 January 2025
Posted:
17 January 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
3. Research Methodology
4. Results and Findings
| Theme | Description | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Freshness | Local ingredients are considered fresher and of higher quality. | “We get tomatoes that are picked the same day. They’re noticeably better than anything else.” |
| Authenticity | Locally sourced ingredients reflect traditional flavors. | “Our pasta sauce is made from tomatoes grown just 10 miles from here – it tastes authentic.” |
| Seasonality | Seasonal produce adds variety and unique flavors to dishes. | “When we use local mushrooms in the winter, the taste is so different; it’s part of the season.” |
| Local Flavor | Locally grown products enhance the overall flavor profile. | “Local basil has a completely different taste than what you can buy at a big store.” |
| Variety | Sourcing locally allows access to regional varieties. | “We use heirloom tomatoes that you can’t find in the supermarkets.” |
| Theme | Description | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Supply Variability | The availability of local ingredients is inconsistent. | “We’ve had to adjust the menu because some ingredients are just not available.” |
| Delivery Delays | Delays in deliveries can disrupt restaurant operations. | “Sometimes the deliveries arrive late, and we have to adjust quickly to avoid waste.” |
| Limited Quantity | Local suppliers may not always provide the needed quantities. | “We’ve had times where we had to scramble for ingredients because the local supplier ran out.” |
| Seasonal Restrictions | Seasonal availability limits ingredient options. | “Certain vegetables are only available in the summer, and it changes the whole menu.” |
| Supply Chain Flexibility | Need for flexibility to deal with supply interruptions. | “Our local suppliers are more willing to adjust, but that can still be tricky.” |
| Theme | Description | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Higher Prices | Local ingredients tend to be more expensive. | “Locally grown produce is 30% more expensive than what we can get from larger distributors.” |
| Cost vs Quality | Balancing cost with quality is an ongoing challenge. | “Sometimes we have to weigh if the better quality is worth the extra cost for the consumer.” |
| Price Increases | Rising costs of local ingredients put pressure on pricing. | “We had to increase prices to accommodate the higher costs of local sourcing.” |
| Cost Efficiency | Sourcing a mix of local and global ingredients can optimize costs. | “We find a middle ground by using both local and global suppliers for different ingredients.” |
| Economies of Scale | Local suppliers can’t provide the same economies of scale as global suppliers. | “The bulk discounts we get from global suppliers aren’t available with local vendors.” |
| Theme | Description | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Long-Term Partnerships | Developing long-term relationships with local suppliers. | “We’ve worked with some of our local farms for over five years now, and it really helps us.” |
| Mutual Trust | Trust between restaurant operators and local suppliers is crucial. | “If there’s an issue, we know we can rely on our suppliers to make it right.” |
| Flexibility | Local suppliers often provide more flexibility in terms of customization. | “They are happy to adjust to our needs, whether it’s on the size of the orders or unique requests.” |
| Shared Values | Alignment with local suppliers’ values such as sustainability. | “We love working with farms that practice organic methods.” |
| Collaborative Problem Solving | Close communication and cooperation to resolve issues. | “When we faced a short supply, the farm was quick to offer us alternatives.” |
5. Discussion
6. Conclusion
References
- Afghah, M.; Sajadi, S. M.; Razavi, S. M.; Taghizadeh-Yazdi, M. Hard dimensions evaluation in sustainable supply chain management for environmentally adaptive and mitigated adverse eco-effect environmental policies. Business Strategy and the Environment 2023, 32(7), 5044–5067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-kahtib, A.; Alghababsheh, M.; Khattab, M. The role of organizational ambidexterity and frugal innovation in enhancing circular supply chains: The effect of artificial intelligence capabilities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2025, 210, 123905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anwar, M.A.; Zong, Z.; Mendiratta, A.; Yaqub, M.Z. Antecedents of big data analytics adoption and its impact on decision quality and environmental performance of SMEs in the recycling sector. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2024, 205, 123468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Birkel, H.; Wehrle, M. Small-and medium-sized companies tackling the digital transformation of supply chain processes: Insights from a multiple case study in the German manufacturing industry. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 2024, 71, 13711–13726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bor, S.; O’Shea, G.; Hakala, H. Scaling sustainable technologies by creating innovation demand-pull: Strategic actions by food producers. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Calabrese, G. G.; Falavigna, G.; Ippoliti, R. Financial constraints, R&D investment and uncertainty: New evidence from the Italian automotive supply chain. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 2024, 36(11), 3564–3576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cammarano, A.; Varriale, V.; Michelino, F.; Caputo, M. A Patent-Based Tool to Support Component Suppliers Assessment in the Smartphone Supply Chain. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 2024, 71, 531–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cui, Z.; Liu, S.; Hong, J. Political connections and innovation: A stakeholder perspective. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 2024, 71, 5357–5371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Doan, H. Q.; Masciarelli, F.; Meliciani, V. Intangible assets, global value chains, and innovation: Evidence from Vietnamese SMEs. Industrial and Corporate Change 2024, 33(6), 1401–1429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Drake, M. J.; Pittman, P. H.; Talbert, M. Analysis of the incorporation of current trends in supply chain management within curricula. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications 2024, 27(12), 2642–2662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Emon, M. M. H.; Khan, T. Unlocking Sustainability through Supply Chain Visibility: Insights from the Manufacturing Sector of Bangladesh. Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management 2024, 21(4), 2194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Emon, M. M. H.; Khan, T.; Rahman, M. A.; Siam, S. A. J. Factors Influencing the Usage of Artificial Intelligence among Bangladeshi Professionals: Mediating role of Attitude Towards the Technology. 2024 IEEE International Conference on Computing, Applications and Systems (COMPAS); 2024; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Emon, M. M. H.; Khan, T.; Rahman, M. A.; Hamid, A. B. A.; Yaakub, N. I. GreenTech Revolution: Navigating Challenges and Seizing Opportunities. In AI and Green Technology Applications in Society; IGI Global Scientific Publishing, 2025; pp. 63–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hao, X.; Demir, E. Artificial intelligence in supply chain management: Enablers and constraints in pre-development, deployment, and post-development stages. Production Planning and Control 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jugend, D.; dos Santos, H.H.; Garrido, S.; Siqueira, R.M.; Mesa, J.A. Circular product design challenges: An exploratory study on critical barriers. Business Strategy and the Environment 2024, 33(5), 4825–4842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, T.; Emon, M. M. H. Exploring the Potential of the Blue Economy: A Systematic Review of Strategies for Enhancing International Business in Bangladesh in the context of Indo-Pacific Region. Review of Business and Economics Studies 2024, 12(2), 55–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, T.; Emon, M. M. H.; Rahman, M. A. A systematic review on exploring the influence of Industry 4.0 technologies to enhance supply chain visibility and operational efficiency. Review of Business and Economics Studies 2024, 12(3), 6–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, T.; Emon, M. M. H.; Rahman, M. A.; Hamid, A. B. A.; Yaakub, N. I. Bridging the Gap: Realizing GreenTech Potential. In AI and Green Technology Applications in Society; IGI Global Scientific Publishing, 2025; pp. 91–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koc, K.; Ekmekcioğlu, Ö.; Işık, Z. Developing a probabilistic decision-making model for reinforced sustainable supplier selection. International Journal of Production Economics 2023, 259, 108820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lai, K.-H.; Feng, Y.; Zhu, Q. Digital transformation for green supply chain innovation in manufacturing operations. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 2023, 175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Le, T.T.; Behl, A. Linking Artificial Intelligence and Supply Chain Resilience: Roles of Dynamic Capabilities Mediator and Open Innovation Moderator. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 2024, 71, 8577–8590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, W.; Liu, Y.; Lee, P.T.-W.; Yuan, C.; Long, S.; Cheng, Y. Effects of supply chain innovation and application policy on firm performance: Evidence from China. Production Planning and Control 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maheshwari, P.; Kamble, S.; Belhadi, A.; Venkatesh, M.; Abedin, M.Z. Digital twin-driven real-time planning, monitoring, and controlling in food supply chains. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2023, 195, 122799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nazir, S.; Mehmood, S.; Zhaolei, L.; Nazir, Z.; Nazir, S. Analyzing how COVID-19 moderates the relationship between organizational learning capabilities, technological innovation, supply chain management and enterprise performance in the automobile industry. Business Process Management Journal 2024, 30(6), 2184–2209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pang, S.; Chen, M.-C. Investigating the impact of consumer environmental consciousness on food supply chain: The case of plant-based meat alternatives. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2024, 201, 123190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pietrobelli, C.; Calzada Olvera, B.; Iizuka, M.; Mazzi, C. T. Suppliers’ entry, upgrading, and innovation in mining GVCs: Lessons from Argentina, Brazil, and Peru. Industrial and Corporate Change 2024, 33(4), 922–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qu, Y.; Guan, Z.; Li, J.; Liu, T. Cooperative or noncooperative? Green innovation, pricing decisions, and collaborative mechanisms in a supply chain with manufacturer’s disappointment aversion. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 2024, 71, 9588–9603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, A.K.; Kumar, V.R.P.; Dehdasht, G.; Mohandes, S.R.; Manu, P.; Pour Rahimian, F. Investigating barriers to blockchain adoption in construction supply chain management: A fuzzy-based MCDM approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2023, 196, 122849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wong, L.-W.; Tan, G.W.-H.; Ooi, K.-B.; Chan, H.K. Blockchains for SMEs: A Fit-Viability perspective moderated by organizational innovation diffusion for supply chain performance. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 2024, 182, 103396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, H.; Chen, L.; Ma, L. Supply chain product innovation and marketing strategies under different fairness concerns. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 2024, 187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, S.; Xiong, Y.; Lin, Z.; Zhou, Y. Flexible versus committed and specific versus uniform: Wholesale price contracting in a supply chain with downstream process innovation. International Transactions in Operational Research 2024, 31(1), 346–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Y.; Xiao, Z.; Gong, Y.; al Humdan, E. The tone of buyer firms’ annual reports and suppliers’ green innovation: The spillover effects in the supply chain. Business Strategy and the Environment 2024, 33(6), 5721–5735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, J.; Feng, T.; Lu, Y.; Jiang, W. Using blockchain or not? A focal firm’s blockchain strategy in the context of carbon emission reduction technology innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment 2024, 33(4), 3505–3531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).