Figure 1.
(A) Evaluation of cell viability by MTT analysis for 16-48 hours in MCF-7 cells. Cells treated with estradiol hemihydrate (ES, 1, 10 and 100 nM) and DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide (1μ/ml). Data are representative of 7-8 separate measurements and values are given as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed by two-way ANOVA and differences between groups were determined by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. *, p<0.05, when compared with the control group at the same time periods. #, p<0.05, when compared with all other groups at the same time period. §, p<0.05, when compared with 16 and 24 hours within the same dose. (B) Evaluation of cell viability by MTT analysis for 16-48 hours in OVCAR-3 cells. Data are representative of 6-8 separate measurements and values are given as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed by two-way ANOVA and differences between groups were determined by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. *, p<0.05, when compared with the control and DMSO group at the same time period. #, p<0.05, when compared with the control group at the same time period. §, p<0.05, when compared with 24 and 48 hours within the same dose. C) Evaluation of cell viability in BJ cells by MTT analysis for 16-48 hours. Data are representative of 6 separate measurements and values are given as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed by two-way ANOVA. Differences between groups were determined by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. *, p<0.05, when compared with all other groups at the same time periods. §, p<0.05, when compared with 16 hours within the same dose. D) Light microscope image (10X magnification) of ES-applied MCF-7, OVCAR-3 and BJ cells after 48 hours. While no change was observed in the control and DMSO (1μl/ml) groups, a significant proliferation was observed in MCF-7 and OVCAR-3 cells compared to the control as a result of 10 and 100 nM ES application. It was observed that 100 nM ES application for 48 hours caused deterioration in morphology, shrinkage, clustering and toxicity in BJ cells.
Figure 1.
(A) Evaluation of cell viability by MTT analysis for 16-48 hours in MCF-7 cells. Cells treated with estradiol hemihydrate (ES, 1, 10 and 100 nM) and DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide (1μ/ml). Data are representative of 7-8 separate measurements and values are given as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed by two-way ANOVA and differences between groups were determined by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. *, p<0.05, when compared with the control group at the same time periods. #, p<0.05, when compared with all other groups at the same time period. §, p<0.05, when compared with 16 and 24 hours within the same dose. (B) Evaluation of cell viability by MTT analysis for 16-48 hours in OVCAR-3 cells. Data are representative of 6-8 separate measurements and values are given as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed by two-way ANOVA and differences between groups were determined by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. *, p<0.05, when compared with the control and DMSO group at the same time period. #, p<0.05, when compared with the control group at the same time period. §, p<0.05, when compared with 24 and 48 hours within the same dose. C) Evaluation of cell viability in BJ cells by MTT analysis for 16-48 hours. Data are representative of 6 separate measurements and values are given as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed by two-way ANOVA. Differences between groups were determined by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. *, p<0.05, when compared with all other groups at the same time periods. §, p<0.05, when compared with 16 hours within the same dose. D) Light microscope image (10X magnification) of ES-applied MCF-7, OVCAR-3 and BJ cells after 48 hours. While no change was observed in the control and DMSO (1μl/ml) groups, a significant proliferation was observed in MCF-7 and OVCAR-3 cells compared to the control as a result of 10 and 100 nM ES application. It was observed that 100 nM ES application for 48 hours caused deterioration in morphology, shrinkage, clustering and toxicity in BJ cells.

Figure 2.
(A) The effect of sparstolonin B(SsnB) on MCF-7 cell viability. Cell viability analysis was performed for 16-48 hours. Cells treated with DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide (1μl/ml), cells treated with SsnB. Data are representative of 6-8 separate experiments and values are given as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed by two-way ANOVA and differences between groups were determined by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. *, p<0.05, compared to control, DMSO, 3,125-12,5 µM groups within the same time periods. #, p<0.05, compared to 25 µM group within the same time periods. §, p<0,05 when compared to 24 and 48 hours within the same dose. (B) The effect of SsnB on OVCAR-3 cell viability. Data are representative of 7 separate experiments and values are given as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed by two-way ANOVA and differences between groups were determined by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. *, p<0.001, vs. DMSO and control in all incubation periods. #, p<0.001, compared to 3,125-25 µM groups within the same time periods. ¶, p<0.05 vs. 3,125 and 6,25 µM groups within the same period. (C) Effect of SsnB on BJ cell viability. Data are representative of 7-8 separate experiments and values are given as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed by two-way ANOVA and differences between groups were determined by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. *, p<0.05, vs. all groups in the same time periods. (D) Effect of 24h SsnB treatment on cell viability in MCF-7 cells during 48h ES proliferation. Data are representative of 8 separate experiments and values are given as mean ± SD. Cells treated with DMSO (1μ/ml), estradiol hemihydrate (ES, 10 nM) and SsnB (25 μM). Incubation with SsnB started 24 h after ES treatment and was continued for 24 h. Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA and differences between groups were determined by Holm-Sidak’s multiple comparison test. *, p<0.0001, when compared to all groups. #, p<0.0001, compared with control, DMSO and ES 10 nM group. (E) Effect of 24h SsnB treatment on cell viability in OVCAR-3 cells during 48h ES proliferation. Data are representative of 8 separate experiments and values are given as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA and differences between groups were determined by Holm-Sidak multiple comparison test. *, p<0.05, compared with all groups. #, p<0.05, compared with control, DMSO and ES 10 nM group. (F) Light microscope image (10X magnification) of MCF-7 and OVCAR-3 cells after 48 hours of ES (10 nM) application. Incubation with SsnB started 24 h after ES treatment and was continued for 24 h. Significant proliferation was observed in MCF-7 and OVCAR-3 cells compared to the control as a result of 10 nM ES application. SsnB application significantly decreased cell proliferation and caused significant changes in cell morphology in MCF-7 and OVCAR-3 cells compared to the control and ES groups. ES+SP application was observed to cause deterioration in morphology, shrinkage, clustering and toxicity in MCF-7 and OVCAR-3 cells.
Figure 2.
(A) The effect of sparstolonin B(SsnB) on MCF-7 cell viability. Cell viability analysis was performed for 16-48 hours. Cells treated with DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide (1μl/ml), cells treated with SsnB. Data are representative of 6-8 separate experiments and values are given as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed by two-way ANOVA and differences between groups were determined by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. *, p<0.05, compared to control, DMSO, 3,125-12,5 µM groups within the same time periods. #, p<0.05, compared to 25 µM group within the same time periods. §, p<0,05 when compared to 24 and 48 hours within the same dose. (B) The effect of SsnB on OVCAR-3 cell viability. Data are representative of 7 separate experiments and values are given as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed by two-way ANOVA and differences between groups were determined by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. *, p<0.001, vs. DMSO and control in all incubation periods. #, p<0.001, compared to 3,125-25 µM groups within the same time periods. ¶, p<0.05 vs. 3,125 and 6,25 µM groups within the same period. (C) Effect of SsnB on BJ cell viability. Data are representative of 7-8 separate experiments and values are given as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed by two-way ANOVA and differences between groups were determined by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. *, p<0.05, vs. all groups in the same time periods. (D) Effect of 24h SsnB treatment on cell viability in MCF-7 cells during 48h ES proliferation. Data are representative of 8 separate experiments and values are given as mean ± SD. Cells treated with DMSO (1μ/ml), estradiol hemihydrate (ES, 10 nM) and SsnB (25 μM). Incubation with SsnB started 24 h after ES treatment and was continued for 24 h. Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA and differences between groups were determined by Holm-Sidak’s multiple comparison test. *, p<0.0001, when compared to all groups. #, p<0.0001, compared with control, DMSO and ES 10 nM group. (E) Effect of 24h SsnB treatment on cell viability in OVCAR-3 cells during 48h ES proliferation. Data are representative of 8 separate experiments and values are given as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA and differences between groups were determined by Holm-Sidak multiple comparison test. *, p<0.05, compared with all groups. #, p<0.05, compared with control, DMSO and ES 10 nM group. (F) Light microscope image (10X magnification) of MCF-7 and OVCAR-3 cells after 48 hours of ES (10 nM) application. Incubation with SsnB started 24 h after ES treatment and was continued for 24 h. Significant proliferation was observed in MCF-7 and OVCAR-3 cells compared to the control as a result of 10 nM ES application. SsnB application significantly decreased cell proliferation and caused significant changes in cell morphology in MCF-7 and OVCAR-3 cells compared to the control and ES groups. ES+SP application was observed to cause deterioration in morphology, shrinkage, clustering and toxicity in MCF-7 and OVCAR-3 cells.

Figure 3.
(A) Representative immunofluorescent staining of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) in MCF-7 and OVCAR-3 cells treated with either DMSO (1μ/ml), ES (10 nM) and SsnB (25 μM). 10 X magnification. Incubation with SsnB started 24 h after ES treatment and was continued for 24 h in the ES +SsnB group. (B) Quantitation of PCNA fluorescence staining in MCF-7 cells by ImageJ software. Data shown are representative of 10 separate measurements and values are given as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed by one way ANOVA and differences between groups were determined by Tukey multiple comparisons analysis. *, p < 0.0001, vs. control and DMSO groups. #, p < 0.005, vs. control, DMSO and ES 10 nM groups. ¶, p <0.001 vs. ES +SsnB group. (C) Quantitation of PCNA fluorescence staining in OVCAR-3 cells by ImageJ software. Data shown are representative of 10 separate measurements and values are given as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed by one way ANOVA and differences between groups were determined by Tukey multiple comparisons analysis. *, p < 0.0001, vs. control and DMSO groups. #, p < 0.05, vs. control, DMSO and ES 10 nM groups. ¶, p <0.001 vs. ES +SsnB group. (D) PCNA protein levels in MCF-7 cells. Data shown are representative of 10 separate measurements and values are given as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed by one way ANOVA and differences between groups were determined by Tukey multiple comparisons analysis. *, p < 0.0001, vs. control and DMSO groups. #, p < 0.0001, vs. control, DMSO and ES 10 nM groups. (E) PCNA protein levels in OVCAR-3 cells. Data shown are representative of 10 separate measurements and values are given as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed by one way ANOVA and differences between groups were determined by Tukey multiple comparisons analysis. *, p < 0.0001, vs. control and DMSO groups. #, p < 0.0001, vs. control, DMSO and ES 10 nM groups. ¶, p <0.05 vs. ES +SsnB group. (F) Representative immunofluorescent staining of TUNEL staining in MCF-7 and OVCAR-3 cells. (G) Quantitation of TUNEL staining in MCF-7 cells with the ImageJ program. Values mean ± SD (n=10). Statistical analysis was performed by one way ANOVA and differences between groups were determined by Tukey multiple comparisons analysis. *, p < 0.001, vs. control, DMSO and ES 10 nM groups. #, p < 0.001, vs. ES +SsnB. (H) Quantitation of TUNEL staining in OVCAR-3 cells with ImageJ program. Values are mean ± SD (n=10). One-way ANOVA and Tukey multiple comparisons were used to determine statistical significance. *, p < 0.0001, vs. control, DMSO and ES 10 nM groups. #, p < 0.05, vs. ES +SsnB.
Figure 3.
(A) Representative immunofluorescent staining of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) in MCF-7 and OVCAR-3 cells treated with either DMSO (1μ/ml), ES (10 nM) and SsnB (25 μM). 10 X magnification. Incubation with SsnB started 24 h after ES treatment and was continued for 24 h in the ES +SsnB group. (B) Quantitation of PCNA fluorescence staining in MCF-7 cells by ImageJ software. Data shown are representative of 10 separate measurements and values are given as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed by one way ANOVA and differences between groups were determined by Tukey multiple comparisons analysis. *, p < 0.0001, vs. control and DMSO groups. #, p < 0.005, vs. control, DMSO and ES 10 nM groups. ¶, p <0.001 vs. ES +SsnB group. (C) Quantitation of PCNA fluorescence staining in OVCAR-3 cells by ImageJ software. Data shown are representative of 10 separate measurements and values are given as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed by one way ANOVA and differences between groups were determined by Tukey multiple comparisons analysis. *, p < 0.0001, vs. control and DMSO groups. #, p < 0.05, vs. control, DMSO and ES 10 nM groups. ¶, p <0.001 vs. ES +SsnB group. (D) PCNA protein levels in MCF-7 cells. Data shown are representative of 10 separate measurements and values are given as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed by one way ANOVA and differences between groups were determined by Tukey multiple comparisons analysis. *, p < 0.0001, vs. control and DMSO groups. #, p < 0.0001, vs. control, DMSO and ES 10 nM groups. (E) PCNA protein levels in OVCAR-3 cells. Data shown are representative of 10 separate measurements and values are given as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed by one way ANOVA and differences between groups were determined by Tukey multiple comparisons analysis. *, p < 0.0001, vs. control and DMSO groups. #, p < 0.0001, vs. control, DMSO and ES 10 nM groups. ¶, p <0.05 vs. ES +SsnB group. (F) Representative immunofluorescent staining of TUNEL staining in MCF-7 and OVCAR-3 cells. (G) Quantitation of TUNEL staining in MCF-7 cells with the ImageJ program. Values mean ± SD (n=10). Statistical analysis was performed by one way ANOVA and differences between groups were determined by Tukey multiple comparisons analysis. *, p < 0.001, vs. control, DMSO and ES 10 nM groups. #, p < 0.001, vs. ES +SsnB. (H) Quantitation of TUNEL staining in OVCAR-3 cells with ImageJ program. Values are mean ± SD (n=10). One-way ANOVA and Tukey multiple comparisons were used to determine statistical significance. *, p < 0.0001, vs. control, DMSO and ES 10 nM groups. #, p < 0.05, vs. ES +SsnB.

Figure 4.
(A) Representative immunofluorescent staining of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K), phospho (Ser473) protein kinase Akt (p-AKT) and phospho (Ser2448) mammalian target of rapamycin (p-mTOR) in MCF-7 cells treated with either DMSO (1μ/ml), ES (10 nM) and SsnB (25 μM). 10 X magnification. Incubation with SsnB started 24 h after ES treatment and was continued for 24 h in the ES + SsnB group. (B) Quantitation of PI3K fluorescence staining in MCF-7 cells by ImageJ software. Data shown are representative of 9-10 separate measurements and values are given as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed by one way ANOVA and differences between groups were determined by Tukey multiple comparisons analysis. *, p < 0.0001, vs. all groups. #, p < 0.05, vs. all groups. (C) Quantitation of p-AKT fluorescence staining in MCF-7 cells by ImageJ software. Data shown are representative of 9-10 separate measurements and values are given as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed by one way ANOVA and differences between groups were determined by Tukey multiple comparisons analysis. *, p < 0.0001, vs. all groups. **, p< 0.05 vs. all groups. #, p < 0.05, vs. all groups. (D) Quantitation of p-mTOR fluorescence staining in MCF-7 cells by ImageJ software. Data shown are representative of 10 separate measurements and values are given as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed by one way ANOVA and differences between groups were determined by Tukey multiple comparisons analysis. *, p < 0.0001, vs. all groups. #, p < 0.001, vs. all groups. (E) PI3K protein levels in MCF-7 cells. Data shown are representative of 7 separate measurements and values are given as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed by one way ANOVA and differences between groups were determined by Tukey multiple comparisons analysis. *, p < 0.05, vs. all groups. #, p < 0.05, vs. control and DMSO. (F) p-AKT protein levels in MCF-7 cells. Data shown are representative of 7 separate measurements and values are given as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed by one way ANOVA and differences between groups were determined by Tukey multiple comparisons analysis. *, p < 0.05, vs. all groups. #, p <0.001 vs. control, DMSO and ES 10 nM. (G) p-mTOR protein levels in MCF-7 cells. Data shown are representative of 7 separate measurements and values are given as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed by one way ANOVA and differences between groups were determined by Tukey multiple comparisons analysis. *, p < 0.05, vs. all groups.
Figure 4.
(A) Representative immunofluorescent staining of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K), phospho (Ser473) protein kinase Akt (p-AKT) and phospho (Ser2448) mammalian target of rapamycin (p-mTOR) in MCF-7 cells treated with either DMSO (1μ/ml), ES (10 nM) and SsnB (25 μM). 10 X magnification. Incubation with SsnB started 24 h after ES treatment and was continued for 24 h in the ES + SsnB group. (B) Quantitation of PI3K fluorescence staining in MCF-7 cells by ImageJ software. Data shown are representative of 9-10 separate measurements and values are given as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed by one way ANOVA and differences between groups were determined by Tukey multiple comparisons analysis. *, p < 0.0001, vs. all groups. #, p < 0.05, vs. all groups. (C) Quantitation of p-AKT fluorescence staining in MCF-7 cells by ImageJ software. Data shown are representative of 9-10 separate measurements and values are given as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed by one way ANOVA and differences between groups were determined by Tukey multiple comparisons analysis. *, p < 0.0001, vs. all groups. **, p< 0.05 vs. all groups. #, p < 0.05, vs. all groups. (D) Quantitation of p-mTOR fluorescence staining in MCF-7 cells by ImageJ software. Data shown are representative of 10 separate measurements and values are given as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed by one way ANOVA and differences between groups were determined by Tukey multiple comparisons analysis. *, p < 0.0001, vs. all groups. #, p < 0.001, vs. all groups. (E) PI3K protein levels in MCF-7 cells. Data shown are representative of 7 separate measurements and values are given as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed by one way ANOVA and differences between groups were determined by Tukey multiple comparisons analysis. *, p < 0.05, vs. all groups. #, p < 0.05, vs. control and DMSO. (F) p-AKT protein levels in MCF-7 cells. Data shown are representative of 7 separate measurements and values are given as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed by one way ANOVA and differences between groups were determined by Tukey multiple comparisons analysis. *, p < 0.05, vs. all groups. #, p <0.001 vs. control, DMSO and ES 10 nM. (G) p-mTOR protein levels in MCF-7 cells. Data shown are representative of 7 separate measurements and values are given as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed by one way ANOVA and differences between groups were determined by Tukey multiple comparisons analysis. *, p < 0.05, vs. all groups.

Figure 5.
(A) Representative immunofluorescent staining of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K), phospho (Ser473) protein kinase Akt (p-AKT) and phospho (Ser2448) mammalian target of rapamycin (p-mTOR) in OVCAR-3 cells treated with either DMSO (1μ/ml), ES (10 nM) and SsnB (25 μM). 10 X magnification. Incubation with SsnB started 24 h after ES treatment and was continued for 24 h in the ES + SsnB group. (B) Quantitation of PI3K fluorescence staining in OVCAR-3 cells by ImageJ software. Data shown are representative of 10 separate measurements and values are given as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed by one way ANOVA and differences between groups were determined by Tukey multiple comparisons analysis. *, p < 0.001, vs. all groups.**, p < 0.05, vs. control and DMSO. #, p < 0.05, vs. all groups. (C) Quantitation of p-AKT fluorescence staining in OVCAR-3 cells by ImageJ software. Data shown are representative of 10 separate measurements and values are given as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed by one way ANOVA and differences between groups were determined by Tukey multiple comparisons analysis. *, p < 0.0001, vs. all groups. **, p< 0.05 vs. control and DMSO. #, p < 0.001, vs. all groups. (D) Quantitation of p-mTOR fluorescence staining in OVCAR-3 cells by ImageJ software. Data shown are representative of 10 separate measurements and values are given as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed by one way ANOVA and differences between groups were determined by Tukey multiple comparisons analysis. *, p < 0.0001, vs. all groups.**, p < 0.05, vs. control and DMSO #, p < 0.05, vs. all groups. (E) PI3K protein levels in OVCAR-3 cells. Data shown are representative of 7 separate measurements and values are given as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed by one way ANOVA and differences between groups were determined by Tukey multiple comparisons analysis. *, p < 0.05, vs. all groups. #, p < 0.05, vs. control and DMSO. (F) p-AKT protein levels in OVCAR-3 cells. Data shown are representative of 7 separate measurements and values are given as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed by one way ANOVA and differences between groups were determined by Tukey multiple comparisons analysis. *, p < 0.0001, vs. all groups. **, p<0.05 vs. all groups. #, p <0.001 vs. control and DMSO. (G) p-mTOR protein levels in OVCAR-3 cells. Data shown are representative of 7 separate measurements and values are given as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed by one way ANOVA and differences between groups were determined by Tukey multiple comparisons analysis. *, p < 0.001, vs. all groups. **, p<0.05 vs. all groups. #, p <0.001 vs. control and DMSO.
Figure 5.
(A) Representative immunofluorescent staining of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K), phospho (Ser473) protein kinase Akt (p-AKT) and phospho (Ser2448) mammalian target of rapamycin (p-mTOR) in OVCAR-3 cells treated with either DMSO (1μ/ml), ES (10 nM) and SsnB (25 μM). 10 X magnification. Incubation with SsnB started 24 h after ES treatment and was continued for 24 h in the ES + SsnB group. (B) Quantitation of PI3K fluorescence staining in OVCAR-3 cells by ImageJ software. Data shown are representative of 10 separate measurements and values are given as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed by one way ANOVA and differences between groups were determined by Tukey multiple comparisons analysis. *, p < 0.001, vs. all groups.**, p < 0.05, vs. control and DMSO. #, p < 0.05, vs. all groups. (C) Quantitation of p-AKT fluorescence staining in OVCAR-3 cells by ImageJ software. Data shown are representative of 10 separate measurements and values are given as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed by one way ANOVA and differences between groups were determined by Tukey multiple comparisons analysis. *, p < 0.0001, vs. all groups. **, p< 0.05 vs. control and DMSO. #, p < 0.001, vs. all groups. (D) Quantitation of p-mTOR fluorescence staining in OVCAR-3 cells by ImageJ software. Data shown are representative of 10 separate measurements and values are given as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed by one way ANOVA and differences between groups were determined by Tukey multiple comparisons analysis. *, p < 0.0001, vs. all groups.**, p < 0.05, vs. control and DMSO #, p < 0.05, vs. all groups. (E) PI3K protein levels in OVCAR-3 cells. Data shown are representative of 7 separate measurements and values are given as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed by one way ANOVA and differences between groups were determined by Tukey multiple comparisons analysis. *, p < 0.05, vs. all groups. #, p < 0.05, vs. control and DMSO. (F) p-AKT protein levels in OVCAR-3 cells. Data shown are representative of 7 separate measurements and values are given as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed by one way ANOVA and differences between groups were determined by Tukey multiple comparisons analysis. *, p < 0.0001, vs. all groups. **, p<0.05 vs. all groups. #, p <0.001 vs. control and DMSO. (G) p-mTOR protein levels in OVCAR-3 cells. Data shown are representative of 7 separate measurements and values are given as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed by one way ANOVA and differences between groups were determined by Tukey multiple comparisons analysis. *, p < 0.001, vs. all groups. **, p<0.05 vs. all groups. #, p <0.001 vs. control and DMSO.

Table 1.
Sphingolipid levels in MCF-7 and OVCAR-3 cells.
Table 1.
Sphingolipid levels in MCF-7 and OVCAR-3 cells.
| |
Control (n=6) |
DMSO (n=6) |
ES 10 nM (n=6) |
SsnB 25 µM (n=6) |
ES + SsnB (n=6) |
| Sphingolipids (ng/mg protein) |
|
|
|
|
|
| 16:0 SM (d18:1/16:0) |
|
|
|
|
|
| MCF-7 |
124,99 ± 5,22 |
156,82 ± 27,99 |
165,75 ± 25,34 |
153,98 ± 13,82 |
143,83 ± 30,33 |
| OVCAR-3 |
157,40 ± 8,14 |
170,01 ± 13,15 |
143,50 ± 9,06 |
133,11 ± 28,17 |
158,64 ± 26,93 |
| 18:0 SM (d18:1/18:0) |
|
|
|
|
|
| MCF-7 |
67,44 ± 13,12 |
60,60 ± 7,90 |
65,42 ± 24,01 |
61,71 ± 13,20 |
66,73 ± 7,84 |
| OVCAR-3 |
65,09 ± 14,51 |
59,68 ± 2,59 |
66,93 ± 17,35 |
57,40 ± 6,20 |
69,15 ± 22,34 |
| 24:0 SM (d18:1/24:0) |
|
|
|
|
|
| MCF-7 |
45,42 ± 5,91 |
38,30 ± 3,54 |
41,46 ± 5,51 |
39,846 ± 6,82 |
36,15 ± 4,46 |
| OVCAR-3 |
44,08 ± 4,77 |
41,5 ± 2,005 |
41,16 ± 3,11 |
47,386 ± 6,37 |
44,83 ± 8,98 |
| C16 Ceramide (d18:1/16:0) |
|
|
|
|
|
| MCF7 |
71,37 ± 9,38 |
73,71 ± 3,38 |
71,71 ± 2,11 |
7,02 ± 3,88 |
67,21 ± 7,79 |
| OVCAR-3 |
66,41 ± 7,28 |
69,63 ± 7,90 |
69,85 ± 6,76 |
69,87± 2,26 |
63,51 ± 14,33 |
| C18 Ceramide (d18:1/18:0) |
|
|
|
|
|
| MCF-7 |
11,02 ± 0,77 |
10,26 ± 0,54 |
12,33 ± 0,12 |
27,36 ± 1,13**
|
22,73 ± 2,01*
|
| OVCAR-3 |
4,59 ± 1,08 |
6,11 ± 2,16 |
4,8 ± 0,327 |
11,77 ± 0,67*
|
11,90 ± 2,51*
|
| C20 Ceramide (d18:1/20:0) |
|
|
|
|
|
| MCF-7 |
12,51 ± 1,72 |
14,77 ± 1,42 |
15,61± 1,76 |
31,68 ± 0,57*
|
30,54 ± 0,79*
|
| OVCAR-3 |
4,08 ± 0,36 |
4,61 ± 0,69 |
5,16± 0,73 |
33,91 ± 2,53**
|
27,73 ± 1,52*
|
| C22 Ceramide (d18:1/22:0) |
|
|
|
|
|
| MCF-7 |
29,83 ± 2,032 |
27,14 ± 3,11 |
24,69± 1,70 |
65,98 ± 3,64*
|
54,21 ± 2,76*
|
| OVCAR-3 |
17,24 ± 0,98 |
17,44 ± 1,38 |
17,85± 3,77 |
50,99 ± 0,55*
|
48,51 ± 1,76*
|
| C24 Ceramide (d18:1/24:0) |
|
|
|
|
|
| MCF-7 |
39,33 ± 1,09 |
36,41 ± 2,06 |
39,76± 2,75 |
98,55 ± 7,38*
|
88,77 ± 2,56* |
| OVCAR-3 |
39,56 ± 3,38 |
37,57 ± 4,61 |
32,80± 5,11 |
97,56 ± 3,30*
|
92,05 ± 4,72* |
| S1P |
|
|
|
|
|
| MCF-7 |
6,55 ± 0,47 |
5,87 ± 0,21 |
16,81± 0,29≠
|
1,59 ± 0,10$
|
8,91 ± 0,14≠≠
|
| OVCAR-3 |
14,86 ± 0,22 |
14,89 ± 0,20 |
30,23± 0,44≠
|
6,48 ± 0,22$
|
11,43 ± 0,78≠≠
|