Proof of the Binary Goldbach Conjecture

1. Overview

Number theory, "the queen of mathematics" studies the structures and properties defined on integers and primes ( Euclid [15], Hadamard [18], Hardy, Wright [20], Landau [26], Tchebychev ). Numerous problems have been raised and conjectures made, the statements of which are often simple but very difficult to prove. These main components include :

● Elementary arithmetic .

$-$ ˽ Operations on integers, determination and properties of primes.

( Basic operations, congruence, gcd, lcm, ………..).

$-$ Decomposition of integers into products or sums of primes

( Fundamental theorem of arithmetic, decomposition of large numbers, cryptography and Goldbach's conjecture, see Filhoa,Jaimea,de Oliveira Gouveaa,Keller Füchter, ).

● Analytical number theory .

  $-$ Distribution of primes : Prime Number Theorem, the Riemann hypothesis, (see Hadamard [18], De la Vallée-Poussin [45], Littlewood and Erdos [14], ,.....).

 $-$ Gaps between consecutive primes ( Bombieri,Davenport [3], Cramer [9], Baker,Harmann,Iwaniec, Pintz [4,5,24], Granville [17], Maynard [31], Tao [43],

Shanks [40], Tchebychev and Zhang ).

● Algebraic, probabilistic, combinatorial and algorithmic number theories .

$-$    Modular arithmetic.

$-$ Diophantine approximations and equations.

$-$ Arithmetic and algebraic functions.

$-$ Diophantine and number geometry.

$-$ Computational number theory.

2. Definitions notations and background

The integers h, m,M, n, N, k, K ,p, q, Q, r,..…used in this article are always positive. (2.1)

The symbol " / " means : such as or knowing that. . (2.2)

Let $\mathcal{P}$be the infinite set of positive primes $p_k$ (called simply primes) (2.3)

( $p_1$ = 2 ; $p_2$ = 3 ; $p_3\mathrm{ }$= 5 ; $p_{4\mathrm{ }}$= 7 ; $p_5$ = 11 ; $p_6$ = 13 ; ......... )

For any non-zero integer K ${\mathcal{P}}_K$ = { p ∈ $\mathcal{P}$: p ≤ 2K }(2.4)

Writing the large numbers calculated in Appendix 14 is simplified by defining the following constants:

M = ${10}^9$ ; R = 4.${10}^8$ ; G = ${10}^{100}$ ; S = ${10}^{500}$ ; T = 10 ¹⁰⁰⁰ (2.5)

ln(x) denotes the neperian logarithm of the real x > 0 (2.6)

Let (${ W}_{2n}$) be the sequence of primes defined by

∀ n ∈ ℕ + 3 $W_{2n}$ = Sup ( p ∈ $\mathcal{P}$ : p ≤ 2n - 3 ) (2.7)

For any odd prime q , let (${ Wq}_{2n}$) be the sequence of primes defined by

∀ n ∈ ℕ n ≥ ${\displaystyle \frac{(q+3)}{2}}$          ${Wq}_{2n}$ = Sup ( p ∈ $\mathcal{P}$ : p ≤ 2n - q ) (2.8)

Any sequence denoted by (${ G}_{2n}$) = (${ U}_{2n };V_{2n }$) verifying (2.9) is called a Goldbach sequence.

∀ n ∈ ℕ + 2 $U_{2n}$ ,$V_{2n}$  ∈  $\mathcal{P}$ and $U_{2n}$ + $V_{2n}$ = 2n (2.9)

        ${\mathrm{ }U}_{2n}$ and $V_{2n}$ are also known as "Goldbach partitions or Goldbach decomponents".

Iwaniec,Pintz have shown that for a sufficiently large integer n there is always a prime between n − $n^{23/42 }$ and n . Baker and Harman [4],concluded that there is a prime in the interval [ n ; n + o ( $n^{0.525}\left)\right] .$ Thus this results provides an increase of the gap between two consecutive primes $p_k$ and $p_{k+1 }$of the form

$\forall$ $\epsilon$ > 0    $\exists$ $k_{\epsilon }$ ∈${\mathbb{ }\mathbb{N}}^{\mathrm{*}}$ │ ∀ k ∈ ℕ k ≥ $k_{\epsilon }$ $p_{k+1}$ - $p_k$ < $\epsilon .p_k^{0.525}$ (2.10)

The results obtained on the Cramer-Granville-Maier-Nicely conjecture [1,3,9,17,30],imply the following majorization.

For any real c > 2 and for any integer k ≥ 500

$p_{k+1}$ - $p_k$ ≤ 0.7 ${\mathrm{l}\mathrm{n}}^{\mathrm{c}}$($p_k$) (with probability one) (2.11)

and

$p_{k+1}$ - $p_k$ ≤ 20.ln($p_k$)(on average) (2.12)

The following abbreviations have been adopted :

● Lagrange-Lemoine-Levy conjecture (3L) conjecture (2.13)

● Bachet-Bézout-Goldbach conjecture (BBG) conjecture (2.14)

● (Extreme) Goldbach decomponents (E).G.D. (2.15)

3. Introduction

Chen [7], Hardy, Littlewood [21], Hegfollt, Platt [22], Ramaré, Saouter [35], Tao [43],

Tchebychev and Vinogradov have taken important steps and obtained promising results on the Goldbach conjecture (Any integer n ≥ 2 is the mean arithmetic of two primes). Indeed, Helfgott, Platt proved the ternary Goldbach conjecture in 2013.

Silva, Herzog, Pardi held the record for calculating the terms of Goldbach sequences after determining pairs of primes ( $U_{2n} ; V_{2n}$) verifying

∀ n ∈ ℕ │ 4 ≤ 2n ≤ 4.10¹⁸ $U_{2n}$ + $V_{2n}$ = 2n (3.1)

Goldbach's conjecture has also been verified for all even integers 2n satisfying

${10}^{5k}$ ≤ 2n ≤  ${10}^{5k}$ + ${10}^8$ : k = 3, 4, 5, 6,........,20

and

${10}^{10k}$ ≤ 2n ≤ ${10}^{10k}$ + ${10}^9$ : k = 20, 21, 22, 23, 24,.......,30

by Deshouillers, te Riele, Saouter [11].

In previous research work there is no explicit construction of recurrent Goldbach sequences.

In this article, for any integer n greater than two the E.G.D. $U_{2n}$ and $V_{2n}$ are computed iteratively using a simple and efficient "localised" algorithm.

Using Maxima and Maple scientific computing software on a personal computer Silva's record is broken and many E.G.D. are calculated up to the neighbourhood of

2n = 10⁵⁰⁰ , 10^1000, 10⁵⁰⁰⁰ and G.D. around ${10}^{10000}$ (see Sainty [37]

"In Researchgate.net, Internet Archive, and OEIS, E.G.D. files are supplied : E.G.D. File S around 2n = ${10}^S$ for S = 1, 2, 3,............., 10000").

The binary Goldbach conjecture can be proved globally by strong recurrence on all G.D. using (${Wq}_{2n}$) sequences of primes in the same way via Goldbach(-) conjecture (Any even integer greater than one is the difference of two primes) demonstrated in Teorem 4.

● Remark.

1. Chen conjecture: For any integer K ≥ 1 there are infinitely many pairs of primes with a difference equal to 2K.

2. De Polignac conjecture : Same as Chen, but with consecutive pairs of primes.

3. What we know : April 2013, Yitang Zhang demonstrates that the smallest even integer 2K verifying the conjecture is greater than 70 million.

In 2014 James Maynard then Terence Tao lowered this limit to 246.

We validate Chen’s weak conjecture by verifying directly in the primes tables that all even gaps from 2 to 246 are possible (see Appendix 16 ).

In addition, the (3L) conjectures [10,23,25,28],and its generalization called

(BBG) conjecture are validated.

Using case disjunction reasoning we construct two recurrent E.G.D. sequences of primes (${ V}_{2n }$) and (${ U}_{2n }$) according to the sequence ( $W_{2n}$) by the following process

Firstly,

$U_4$ = 2 and $V_{4 }$= 2 (3.2)

For any integer n greater than two

● Either

( 2n - $W_{2n}$) is a prime

then $V_{2n}$ and $U_{2n}$ are defined directly in terms of $W_{2n}$ .

● Either

( 2n - $W_{2n}$) is a composite number

then $V_{2n}$ and $U_{2n}$ are determined from the previous terms of the sequence (${ G}_{2n}$).

( This process can be reversed by first determining the increasing sequence of primes less than Inf ( 2n - $W_{2k}$ ∈ $\mathcal{P}$ : k ∈ ℕ ) , which saves a lot of computing time when programming ).

4. Theorem (Chen’s weak or Goldbach(-) conjecture)

∀ K ∈ ℕ* $\exists$ p , q ∈ $\mathcal{P}$ │ p - q = 2K (4.1)

If K ≥ 2 3 ≤ q ≤ 2K and 3 + 2K ≤ p ≤ 4K

Practical method on some examples:

First of all (5 - 3 = 2), then we begin the process at (7 - 3 = 4); we will select the smallest primes for which the difference is precisely 6 (11 - 5 = 6), then 8 (11 - 3 = 8), then 10

(13 - 3 = 10),......... , then 2K (demonstration established by strong recurrence, by the asurd and feedback). All pairs of Goldbach(-) partitions obtained by this method for K between 2 and 123 are listed in Appendix 16 to validate it using Tao results.

Proof. An other proof can also be established by strong recurrence on the integer K ≥ 2. Let ${\mathcal{P}}_{Chen}$( K ) be the following property

" ∀ K ∈ ℕ* $\exists$ p, q ∈ $\mathcal{P}$ │ p - q = 2K 3 ≤ q ≤ 2K and 2K + 3 ≤ p ≤ 4K " (4.2)

►${\mathcal{P}}_{Chen}$( 2 ) is true : 7 - 3 = 4 q = 3 ≤ 4 and p = 7 ≤ 4 x 2 = 8

► Let’s show

∀ M ∈ ℕ │ 2 ≤ M ≤ K then ${\mathcal{P}}_{Chen}$( M ) $⟹$ ${\mathcal{P}}_{Chen}$( K + 1 )

We reason through the absurd

Let p , q ∈ ${\mathcal{P}}_K$ │ p ≥ q

∀ P , Q ∈ $\mathcal{P}$ │ P ≥ Q $\exists$ h, m ∈ ℕ │

P = p + 2h and Q = q + 2m

we assume that

P - Q = p + 2h - q - 2m ≠ 2( K + 1 ) (4.3)

Therefore

p - q ≠ 2( K + 1 - h + m ) (4.4)

You can always choose h ≥ m and h - m ≤ K + 1 .

The set {K + 1 - h + m ; 2h and 2m are any gaps between primes} contains all even integers between 2 and 2K.

However the strong recurrence hypothesis asserts that

∀ M ∈ ℕ │ M ≤ K $\exists$ p, q ∈ $\mathcal{P}$ │ p - q = 2M(4.5)

By choosing : M = K + 1 - h + m

this contradicts (4.4).

So

$\exists$ h, m ∈ ℕ │ P - Q = p + 2h - q - 2m = 2( K + 1 ) (4.6)

knowing

p, p + 2h, q, q + 2m ∈ $\mathcal{P}$h ≥ m and h - m ≤ K + 1

Thus validating the heredity of property ${\mathcal{P}}_{Chen}$(K ).

The property ${\mathcal{P}}_{Chen}$(K ) is therefore true. As a result Goldbach(-) conjecture is validated.

5. Corollary

Let ${(R}_{2K}$) and ${(Q}_{2K}$) be two sequences of primes determined by

$R_{2K}$ = Inf ( p ∈ $\mathcal{P}$: p - 2K ∈ $\mathcal{P}$) and $\underline{Q_{2K}}$= Inf ( p ∈ $\mathcal{P}$: 2K + p ∈ $\mathcal{P}$ ) = $R_{2K}$ - 2K (5.1)

They are defined for any integer K ∈ $\mathbb{N}$* (5.2)

and satisfy

lim $R_{2K}$ = +$\mathrm{\infty }$ (5.3)

${\forall K\in {\mathbb{N}}^{\mathrm{*}}R}_{2K}$, $\underline{Q_{2K}}$ ∈ $\mathcal{P}$ and $R_{2K}$ - $Q_{2K}$ = 2K (5.4)

$\forall K \in {\mathbb{N}}^{*}$ │ 2 ≤ K ≤ 16 3 ≤ $\underline{Q_{2K}}$ ≤ 2K and 2K + 3 ≤ $R_{2K}$ ≤ 4K(5.5)

For any integer K large enough

3 ≤ $\underline{Q_{2K}}$ ≤ ${\left(2K\right)}^{0.525}$ and 2K + 3 ≤ $R_{2K}$ ≤ 2K + ${\left(2K\right)}^{0.525}$(5.6)

Proof.

(5.1) ; (5.2) : According to the previous theorem, the sequences ( $R_{2K }$) and $\underline{{( Q}_{2K })}$ are defined by strong recurrence (finite descent).

(5.3) : $R_{2K}$ ≥ 2K  $⟹$ lim $R_{2K}$ = +$\mathrm{\infty }$

(5.4) : By construction, these sequences thus verify : $R_{2K}$ - $Q_{2K}$ = 2K

(5.5) : The property can be verified directly term-to-term by examining the sequence proposed above.

(5.6) : This property is verified up to 2K = 246 by calculations on the previous list.

We prove this result by recurrence

First of all, we order the Goldbach(-) decomponents at a fixed prime q , so as to obtain the estimate (5.6) more easily.

Let $q_r$ be the (r + 1)th prime :

We examine the sequences of primes ( $T_r$( K )${)}_{K\in \mathbb{N}}$ satisfying :

$T_1$(K ) = 2K + 3

($T_1$(K ) ; 2K ) → (5;2) ; (7 4) ; (11;8) ; (13;10) ; (17;14) ; (19;16) ; (23;20) ; (29;26) ; (29;28);..

$T_2$(K ) = 2K + 5

($T_2$(K ) ; 2K ) → (7;2) ; (11;6) ; (13;8) ; (17;12) ; (19;14) ; (23;18) ; (29;24) ; (31;26) ; (37;32)................................

$T_3$(K ) = 2K + 7

($T_3$(K ) ; 2K ) → (11;4) ; (13;6) ; (17;10) ; (19;12) ; (23;16) ; (29;22) ; (31;24) ; (37;30)...........

$T_4$(K) = 2K + 11

(T11(K ) ; 2K ) → (13;2) ; (17;6) ; (19;8) ; (23;12) ; (29;18) ; (31;20) ; (37;26) ; (41;30) ; (43;34).........................

(T13(K ) ; 2K ) → (17;4) ; (19;6) ; (23;10) ;(29;16) ; (31;18) ; (37;24) ; (41;28) ; (43;30 ; (47;34)..........................

......................................

$T_r$(K ) = 2K + $q_r$ ( K ∈ ${\mathbb{N}}^{*}$ : $T_r$(K ) and $q_r$ are primes ) (see Appendix 16 )

For any integer K satisfying ${(2K )}^{0.525}$ > $q_r$ the property holds for $T_r$( K ).

Therefore it is generally validated for all K > $K_0$, since we obtain all possible cases of

Chen's weak conjecture starting with $T_1$(K), then $T_2$(K ), then $T_3$(K ) .... for ${(2K )}^{0.525}$ ≤ $q_r$ .

(can be proved by strong recurrence using the same method as in Theorem 4 by "finite descent").

Let a = ${\displaystyle \frac{40}{21}}$ and $P_a$( r ) be the following property

"For any integer M │ 2M < ${( q_r)}^a$ there exists at least a prime q < $q_r$ │ 2 M + q ∈ $\mathcal{P} \text{'}\text{'}$

▶ $P_a$($K_0$) is true (see Appendix 16).

▶ Let’s show : $P_a$( r ) $⟹$ $P_a$( r + 1)

$q_{r+1}$ ≤ $q_r$ + $q_r^{0.525}$ (5.6)

It is assumed that M │

$T_{r+1}$(K) - $q_{r+1}$ ≠ 2M knowing 2M < ${\left(q_{r+1}\right)}^{c_p}$∀ $T_m$(R), $q_m$ ∈ $\mathcal{P}$ $\exists$ h, s ∈ ℕ │ $T_{r+1}$(K) = $T_m$(R) + 2h and $q_{r+1}$ = $q_m$ + 2s (5.7)

then

$T_m$(R) - $q_m$ ≠ 2( M + s - h ) (5.8)

which is impossible according to the hypothesis of strong recurrence since

2( M + s - h ) is less than Sup ${\left(q_m\right)}^a$ and that all primes $T_m$(R) , $q_m$ satisfy the recurrence hypothesis.

We deduce that : ${Pc}_p$( r ) $⟹$ ${Pc}_p$( r + 1)

Thus the property (5.5) is true.

6. Lemma (Goldbach’s fundamental Lemma)

Let q be an odd prime

For any integer n ≥ $n_q$ there exists an integer s │

2n - ${Wq}_{2s}$ ∈ $\mathcal{P}$(6.1)

Let ( ${Zq}_{2n}$ ) be the sequence of primes defined by

∀ n ∈ ℕ n ≥ $n_q$ ${Zq}_{2n}$ = Inf ( 2n - ${Wq}_{2k}$ ∈ $\mathcal{P}$ : k ∈ ℕ ) (6.2)

All G.D. are contains in the set {(2n - ${Zq}_{2n}$ ; ${Zq}_{2n}$ ) : n ∈ ℕ + 3}

For any integer n ≥ $n_0{Z3}_{2n}$ ≤ ${\left(2n\right)}^{0.525}$ (6.3)

${Z3}_{2n}$ ≤ o ${\left(2n\right)}^{0.525}$ (6.4)

Proof. The proofs of propositions (6.1), (6.2) and (6.3) are established following the same principle of strong recurrence as in Theorem 4 and Corollary 5 by "return, absurd and finite descent"

(6.1) : For any integer n > 3 and for any odd primes r, q │ 3 ≤ r < q,

there exists an integer $M_r$ │

2n - ${Wq}_{2k}$ = 2n - 2$M_r$ - ${Wr}_{2k}$ = 2(n - $M_r$) - ${Wr}_{2k}$

or

2( n + 1) - ${Wq}_{2k}$ = 2( n + 1 - $M_r$) - ${Wr}_{2k}$then by recurrence and the absurd the property is validated.

(Proof to develop).

Remark. A better estimate of the following form can be obtained by the same method with probability one or on average using the results of Bombieri [3], Cramer [9], Granville ,

Nicely and Maier :

$\forall$ n ∈ ℕ : n ≥ $n_0$ ;

For any real c > 2 $U_{2n}$ < 1.7 ${\mathrm{l}\mathrm{n}\left(n\right)}^c$ (with probability one) (6.5)

and

${\exists K\mathrm{’}\ge 3.5│U}_{2n}$ < K’.${\mathrm{l}\mathrm{n}}^{1.3}$(n) (on average) ( 6.6)

7. Principle of proof

To determine the E.G.D. three sequences of primes ( $W_{2n} ),$( $V_{2n}$ ), ( $U_{2n} )$ are defined and they verify the following properties

lim $V_{2n}$ = +$\mathrm{\infty }.$ (7.1)

∀ n ∈ ℕ + 2 $V_{2n}$ is defined as a function of $W_{2n}$ = Sup ( p ∈ Ƥ : p ≤ 2n - 3 ) (7.2)

( $W_{2n}$ ) is an increasing sequence of primes that contains all of them except $p_1$ = 2 (7.3)

lim $W_{2n}=+\mathrm{\infty }$ (7.4)

(${ U}_{2n }$) is a complementary sequence to ($W_{2n}$ ) of negligible primes with respect to 2n (7.5)For any integer n $\ge 3$

● If ( 2n - $W_{2n}$) is a prime

then $V_{2n}$ and $U_{2n}$ are defined by

$V_{2n}$ = $W_{2n}$ and $U_{2n}$= 2n - $W_{2n}$ (7.6)

● Otherwise, if ( 2n - $W_{2n}$) is a composite number

we search for two previous terms of the sequence (${ G}_{2n }$), $U_{2(n-k)}$ ₎ and $V_{2(n-k)}$ satisfying the following conditions

$U_{2(n-k)}$, $V_{2(n-k)}$ , [$U_{2(n-k)}$ + 2k ] ∈ $\mathcal{P}$ (7.7) $U_{2\left(n-k\right)}$ + $V_{2\left(n-k\right)}$ = 2(n - k )

which is always possible (see Theorem 4 and "Goldbach’s fundamental Lemma 6")

So by setting

$V_{2n}$ = $V_{2(n-k)}$ and $U_{2n}$ = $U_{2(n-k)}$+ 2k (7.8)

two new primes $V_{2n}$ and $U_{2n}$ satisfying (4.10) are generated │

$U_{2n}$ + $V_{2n}$ = 2n (7.9)

This process is then repeated incrementing n by one unit (n ← n + 1).

● Remark. Using the same method as in Theorem 4, we can the following equivalent property by strong recurrence : For any integer n greater than 48

${\mathcal{P}}_{ret}$(n) : " There exists an integer K such that 2K + $U_{2(n-k)}\in \mathcal{P}"$ (7.10)

To this end, .

▶ ${\mathcal{P}}_{ret}$(49) is true.

▶ The heredity of the property ${\mathcal{P}}_{ret}$(n) : ${\mathcal{P}}_{ret}$ (n) $⟹{ \mathcal{P}}_{ret}$(n + 1)

can be proved by the absurd and returning to the previous terms by noting that

For any integer r │ r ≤ n , there is at least one integer ${\mathrm{M}}_{\mathrm{r}}$ │

$U_{2(n+1-k)}$ = 2$M_r$ + $U_{2(r+1-k)}$then

2K + $U_{2(n+1-k)}$ = 2( K + $M_r$ ) + $U_{2(r+1-k)}$ = 2P + $U_{2(r+1+M_r-P)}$(7.11)

By posing : P = K + $M_r$ and $r+1+M_r$ ≤ n

Now, according to the recurrence hypothesis on ${\mathcal{P}}_{ret}$(n) there exists an integer P │

2P + $U_{2(r+1+M_r-P)}$ ∈ $\mathcal{P}$(7.12)

then there exists an integer K │

2K + $U_{2(n+1-k)}$ ∈ $\mathcal{P}$ (7.13)

In summary, the property ${\mathcal{P}}_{ret}$(n) is hereditary and, as a result, verifiable.

We apply the same type of reasoning using Theorem 4 to the general case with the sequence (${Wq}_{2n}$), showing :

For any integer n > 2 there exists an integer K │

2K + $q_{2n}$ ∈ $\mathcal{P}$

8. Theorem (Goldbach conjecture)

There exists at least a recurrent sequence ( $G_{2n}$ ) = ( $U_{2n};V_{2n})$ of primes satisfying the following conditions.

For any integer n ≥ $2$$U_{2n}$ ,

$V_{2n}$$\mathsf{ϵ}$$\mathcal{P}$ and $U_{2n}$ + $V_{2n}$ = 2n (8.1)

(Any integer n ≥ $2$ is the mean arithmetic of two primes)

An algorithm can be used to explicitly compute any term $U_{2n}$and $V_{2n}$ (8.2)

Proof.

▄ GLOBAL STRONG RECURRENCE :

The proof can be made using the following strong recurrence principle.

Let $P_G$(n) be the property defined for any integer n ≥ 2 by

$P_G$(n) : " For any integer p satisfying 2 ≤ p ≤ n there exists two primes$U_{2p}$ and $V_{2p}$ such their sum is equal to 2p ".

( ∀ p ∈ ℕ │ 2 ≤ p ≤ n $U_{2p}$ ,

$V_{2p}$ $\in$$\mathcal{P}$ and $U_{2p}$ + $V_{2p}$ = 2p )

Let's show by strong recurrence that $P_G$(n) is true for any integer n ≥ 2

▶ $P_G$(2) is true : it suffices to choose ${ U}_4$ = $V_4$ = 2 .

▶ Let's show that the property $P_G$(n) is hereditary : $P_G$(n) $⟹$ $P_G$(n + 1)

Assume property $P_G$(n) is true.

● If ( 2(n + 1) - $W_{2(n+1)}$) is a prime

then $V_{2(n+1) }$ and $U_{2(n+1) }$ are defined by

$V_{2(n+1)}$ = $W_{2(n+1)}$ and $U_{2(n+1)}$= 2(n+1) - $W_{2(n+1)}$ (8.3)

● Otherwise, if ( 2(n+1) - $W_{2(n+1)}$) is a composite number

there exists an integer k to obtain two terms $U_{2(n+1-k)}$ ₎ and $V_{2(n+1-k)}$ satisfying the following conditions

$U_{2(n+1-k)}$, $V_{2(n+1-k)}$ and $U_{2(n+1-k)}$ + 2k ∈ Ƥ (8.4) $U_{2\left(n+1-k\right)}$ + $V_{2\left(n+1-k\right)}$ = 2( n +1- k )

we use the previous terms of the sequence ( $G_{2n }$).

For any integer q │ 1 ≤ q ≤ n - 3 we have

3 ≤ $U_{2(n-q)}$ ≤ n .

Then there exists an integer k 1 ≤ k ≤ n - 3 │

$R_{2n}$ = $U_{2(n-k)}$ + 2k ∈ Ƥ (8.5)

following the Bertrand principle and Theorem 4 since all primes smaller than ${\left(2n\right)}^{0.525 }$ are in the set {${ U}_{2k}$ : k ≤ n }

( If there were no such primes, we would have a contradiction with the Theorem 4 or with Goldbach’s fundamental Lemma 6 ) . In fact, in an equivalent way (see the previous remark) we can copy the proof of Teorem 4 by performing a similar strong recurrence ”finite descent feedback and absurd” directly on the set { $U_{2k}$ : k ≤ n } │

$R_{2n}$ = $U_{2(n-k)}$ + 2k ∈ Ƥ (8.6)

The smallest integer k │ $R_{2n}$ ∈ Ƥ is denoted by $k_n$ .

So by setting

$U_{2n}$ = $U_{2\left(n-k_n\right)}$ + 2$k_n$ and $V_{2n}$ = $V_{2\left(n-k_n\right)}$ ∈ Ƥ (8.7)

(These two terms are primes)

In the previous steps two primes ${ U}_{2\left(n-k_n\right)}$ and $V_{2\left(n-k_n\right)}$whose sum is equal to 2(n - $k_n$) were

determined.

$U_{2\left(n-k_n\right)}$ + $V_{2\left(n-k_n\right)}$ = 2(n -$k_n$) (8.8)

By adding the term $2k_n$ to each member of the equality (8.6) it follows

$U_{2\left(n-k_n\right)}$ + 2$k_n$ + $V_{2\left(n-k_n\right)}$= 2(n - $k_n$) + 2$k_n$ (8.9)

$\iff$ [ $U_{2\left(n-k_n\right)}$ + 2$k_n$] + $V_{2\left(n-k_n\right)}$ = 2n (8.10)

$\iff$$U_{2n}$ + $V_{2n}$ = 2n (8.11)

Two new primes $V_{2(n+1)}$ and $U_{2(n+1)}$ satisfying (${ U}_{2(n+1)}$ + $V_{2(n+1)}$ = 2(n + 1) ) are generated.

It follows that $P_G$(n + 1) is true. Then the property $P_G$(n) is hereditary :

$P_G$(n) $⟹$ $P_G$(n + 1).

Therefore for any integer n ≥ 2 the property $P_G$(n) is true.

It follows

$\forall$ n ∈ ℕ + 2 there are two primes $U_{2n}$ and $V_{2n}$ and such their sum is 2n : $U_{2n}$ + $V_{2n}$ = 2n

▄ ALGORITHM :

For any integer n $\ge 3$

● If ( 2n - $W_{2n}$) is a prime

then $V_{2n }$ and $U_{2n}$ are defined by

$V_{2n}$ = $W_{2n}$ and $U_{2n}$= 2n - $W_{2n}$ (8.12)

● Otherwise, if ( 2n - $W_{2n}$) is a composite number

we use the previous terms of the sequence ( $G_{2n }$).

For any integer q │ 1 ≤ q ≤ n - 3 we have

3 ≤ $U_{2(n-q)}$ ≤

n .

Then there exists an integer k 1 ≤ k ≤ n - 3 │

$R_{2n}$ = $U_{2(n-k)}$ + 2k ∈ Ƥ (8.13)

following Theorem 4 since all primes smaller than ${\left(2n\right)}^{0.525 }$ are in the set {${ U}_{2k}$ : k ≤ n }

( If there were no such primes, we would have a contradiction with the Theorem 4 or with Goldbach’s fundamental Lemma 6 ) . In fact, in an equivalent way (see the previous remark) we can copy the proof of Teorem 4 by performing a similar strong recurrence ‘’finite descent return and absurd” directly on the set { $U_{2k}$ : k ≤ n } │

$R_{2n}$ = $U_{2(n-k)}$ + 2k ∈ Ƥ (8.14)

The smallest integer k │ $R_{2n}$ ∈ Ƥ is denoted by $k_n$ .

So

$U_{2n}$ = $U_{2\left(n-k_n\right)}$ + 2$k_n$ and $V_{2n}$ = $V_{2\left(n-k_n\right)}$ ∈ Ƥ (8.15)

(These two terms are primes)

In the previous steps two primes ${ U}_{2\left(n-k_n\right)}$ and $V_{2\left(n-k_n\right)}$whose sum is equal to 2(n - $k_n$) were

determined.

$U_{2\left(n-k_n\right)}$ + $V_{2\left(n-k_n\right)}$ = 2(n -$k_n$) (8.16)

By adding the term $2k_n$ to each member of the equality (8.16) it follows

$U_{2\left(n-k_n\right)}$ + 2$k_n$ + $V_{2\left(n-k_n\right)}$= 2(n - $k_n$) + 2$k_n$(8.17)

$\iff$ [ $U_{2\left(n-k_n\right)}$ + 2$k_n$] + $V_{2\left(n-k_n\right)}$ = 2n (8.18)

$\iff$$U_{2n}$ + $V_{2n}$ = 2n (8.19)

Finally, for any integer n ≥ 3 this algorithm determines two sequences of primes ( $U_{2n}$ )

and ( $V_{2n}$ ) verifying Goldbach's conjecture.

9. Lemma

The sequence ($U_{2n}$) verifies the following majorization

For any integer n ≥ 65

$U_{2n}$ ≤ (2${n)}^{0.525}$ (9.1)

and

$U_{2n}$ = o ((2${n)}^{0.525}$) (9.2)

Proof. According to the programm 12.2 and Appendix 14 the majorization (9.1) is verified

for any integer n │ 65 ≤ n ≤ 2000 .

For any integer n > 2000 the proof is established by recurrence. For this purpose let $P_{bhip}$(n ) be the following property

$P_{bhip}$(n ) : " $U_{2n}$ ≤ ${\left(2n\right)}^{0.525}$ " .(9.3)

▶ $P_{bhip}$(2000) is true according to program 13.2 and the table in appendix 14.

▶ For any integer n ≥ 2000 let’s show that $P_{bhip}$(n ) is hereditary :

$P_{bhip}$(n) $⟹$ .$P_{bhip}$(n + 1)

Assume that $P_{bhip}$(n ) is true : then

● If ( 2(n + 1) - $W_{2(n+1)}$) is a prime

then $V_{2(n+1)}$ and $U_{2(n+1)}$ are defined by

$V_{2(n+1)}$ = $W_{2(\mathrm{n}+1)}$ and $U_{2(n+1) }$= 2(n + 1) - $W_{2(n+1)}$ (9.4)

According to the results in [4,5], (see Lemma 9 ) there is a constant K > 0 such that

2(n + 1) - K .${\left[2\right(n+1\left)\right]}^{0.525}$ < $W_{2(n+1)}$ < 2(n + 1)

$⟹$$U_{2(n+1)}$ = 2(n + 1) - $W_{2(n+1)}$< K ${.\left[2\right(n+1\left)\right]}^{0.525}$$⟹$ $U_{2(n+1)}$ ≤ K ${.\left[2\right(n+1\left)\right]}^{0.525}$

● Otherwise, if ( 2(n + 1) - $W_{2(n+1)}$ ) is a composite number

$\exists$ p ∈ ${\mathbb{N}}^{\mathrm{*}}$│ $U_{2(n+1)}$ = $U_{2(n+1-p)}$ + 2p (9.5)

According to [4,5],

$U_{2(n+1)}$ = 2p + $U_{2(n+1-p)}$= 2p + 2(n + 1 - p) - $W_{2(n+1-p)}=$2(n + 1) - $W_{2(n+1-p)}$ (9.6)

Via " Goldbach's fundamental Lemma 6 " it follows that

$U_{2(n+1)}$ < K$.[{2(n+1)]}^{0.525}$ (9.7)

$P_{bhip}$(n + 1) is true then $P_{bhip}$(n ) is hereditary.

So for any integer n ≥ 2000 the property $P_{bhip}$(n ) is true.

Finally $U_{2(n+1)}$ ≤ ${\left[2\right(n+1\left)\right]}^{0.525}$

● Remark. A more precise estimate can be obtained using the Cipolla or Axler frames [2,8].

10. Proposition

Liaison between Goldbach conjecture and fundamental theorem of arithmetic.

A log-exp correspondence is established by linking the sum and product of primes via Goldbach's conjecture and the fundamental theorem of arithmetic, since if G.D. of 2n are p' and q', and if 2n decomposes into factors P " and Q " │

( p’, q’ ∈ Ƥ │ p’ $\gg$ q’ and P " $\gg$ Q " ) ; then,

2n = P ".Q " = p’ + q’ and p’ - q’ = 2K

ln(P ".Q ") = ln(P ") + ln(Q ")

= ln(p’ + q’) = ln(p’(1 + q’/p’))

≈ ln(p’) + q’/p’

By choosing p’ = next or prevprime(P ") (P " = p’ +/- a)

we obtain a q' localization of the form

q’ ≈ [ p’.ln(Q ")] ≈ [ p’.ln(2n / P ")] ≈ [ p’.ln(2n / p’)]

.then

2n ≈ p’( 1 + ln(2n / p’))

2n ≈ p’( 1 + ln(2n / P ")) ≈ p’( 1 + ln(2n / (p’ +/- a))

2n ≈ p’( 1 + ln(2n / (p’(1 +/- a/p’)))

2n ≈ p’( 1 + ln((2n / p’).(1 / (1 +/- a / p’))))

2n ≈ p’( 1 + ln(2n/p’) + ln(1/(1 +/- a/p’)))

2n ≈ p’( 1 + ln(2n/p’)) -/+ a

You can solve equations like these using Maple,

solve( 2n +/- a = x*( 1 + ln(2n / x)), x)

to locate p' and proceed by successive next or prevprime to determine two G.D. of 2n,

(programming possible in Algorithm 14). This procedure appears to generalise Pocklington's theorem, and we observe that the G.D. and their number G(E) are related to the number of prime factors in the decomposition of 2n .

Examples :

● evalf(solve([90 = x*(1 + ln(96/x)), x < 96], x));

{x = 64.12418697} ; p’ = 67 q’ = 29

● evalf(solve([1000 = x*(1 + ln(1100/x)), x < 1100], x));

{x = 665.6361412}

prevprime(665); 661

isprime(1100 - 661); true ; p’ = 661 q’ = 439

● evalf(solve([9700 = x*(1 + ln(10000/x)), x < 10000], x));

{x = 7652.697929}

prevprime(7652); 7649

isprime(10000 - 7649); true ; p’ = 7649 q’ = 4351

● evalf(solve([99950 = x*(1 + ln(100000/x)), x < 100000], x));

{x = 96854.43333}

a := prevprime(96799); a := 96797 # Obtenu au bout de 3 ou 4 prevprime( )

isprime(100000 - a); true ; p’ = 96799 q’ = 3201

Solutions are :

$x_0$ = Re(- (2n +/- a)/LambertW(-1,-(2n +/- a) / (2n.e)))

and

$x_1$= Re(- (2n +/- a)/LambertW(-(2n +/- a) / (2n.e)))

Remarks. For any composite number n greater than three,

gcd( n , p ) = gcd(n , 2n - p ) = gcd( n , q ) = gcd( n , K ) = 1.

The smallest E.G.D. is less than the square of the largest prime factor. The smallest of two G.D. of 2n# is greater than n ( if n ∈ Ƥ ).

Méthode de localisation des produits de G.D. ( Différence de carrés N² - K² ou moyennes géométriques ).

Localement (au voisinage de 2n ), il existe une sous-suite (${p\mathrm{\text{'}}}_s$ , ${q\mathrm{\text{'}}}_s$) de G.D. de 2s telle que la suite produit ${p\mathrm{\text{'}}}_s$.${q\mathrm{\text{'}}}_s$ = s² - k² soit presque croissante ( les variations de la moyenne géométrique suivent presque celles de la moyenne arithmétique). Ainsi, il est possible de déterminer des décomposants de Goldbach de 2n par l’algorithme suivant en choisissant un voisinage de 2n de l’ordre de c.ln²(2n) en accord avec les estimations effectuées sur la fonction de répartition G(E) associée à la comète de Goldbach.

>

pinf := prevprime(735); pinf := 733

qinf := nextprime(17); qinf := 19

psup := nextprime(1050); psup := 1051

qsup := nextprime(29); qsup := 31

m2 := pinf + qinf; m2 := 752

r2 := psup + qsup; r2 := 1082

km2 := pinf - qinf; km2 := 714

kr2 := psup - qsup; kr2 := 1020

a := m2*m2 - km2*km2; a := 55708

b := r2*r2 - kr2*kr2; b := 130324

min2 := trunc(0.5*evalf(sqrt(n2*n2 - b))); min2 := 466

max2 := trunc(0.5*evalf(sqrt(n2*n2 - a))); max2 := 485

em1 := 0.5*n2 + min2;

em := nextprime(trunc(0.5*n2) + min2 - 1);

nextprime(em); em1 := 966.0

em := 967 971

em2 := 0.5*n2 + max2; em2 := 985.0

q := n2 - 971; q := 29

isprime(q); true

11. Theorem

For any integer n $\ge$ 3 it is easy to check

( $W_{2n}$ ) is a positive increasing sequence of primes (11.1)

{ $W_{2n}$ : n $\in$ IN + 3 } $\cup \left\{2\right\}$ = $\mathcal{P}$ (11.2)

lim $W_{2n}$ = +oo (11.3)

( $U_{2n}$ ) and ($V_{2n}$) are sequences of primes and the set { $U_{2k}$ : k ≤ n } (11.4)

contains all primes less than ln( n )

n $\le$ $V_{2n}$ ≤ $W_{2n}$ (11.5)

3$\le {2n-W_{2n}\le U}_{2n}\le$n (11.6)

lim $V_{2n}$ = +oo (11.7)

Proof.

(11.1) : For any integer n ≥ 2 ${ \mathcal{P}}_n$ $\subset$ ${\mathcal{P}}_{n+1}$ .Therefore, $W_{2n}$ ≤ $W_{2(n+1)}$. So the sequence (${ W}_{2n }$) is increasing.

(11.2) : Any prime except $p_1$ = 2 is odd, hence the result.

(11.3) : lim $W_{2n}$ = lim $p_k$ = +oo

(11.4) : By definition $V_{2n}$ = $W_{2n}$ or there exits an integer k ≤ n - 2 │ $V_{2n}$ = $V_{2(n-k)}$ .

So the terms of the sequence ( $V_{2n)}$) are primes.

(11.5) : According to Lemma 9, for any integer n ≥ 65

$U_{2n}$ < ${\left(2n\right)}^{0.525}$ therefore

$U_{2n}$ < ${\left(2n\right)}^{0.55}$ < n

and

$V_{2n}$ = 2n - $U_{2n}$ > 2n - n > n

For any integer n │ 3 ≤ n ≤ 65 verification is carried out according to the computer program in paragraph 13.2 and the table in appendix 14.

We can also see that by construction $V_{2n}$ ≥ $U_{2n}$ because if we assume the opposite then $V_{2n}$ is not the largest prime number verifying

${\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}}$ ( $U_{2n}$ + $V_{2n}$ ) = n .

So

$V_{2n}$ ≥ n

According to (11.5) n $\le$ $V_{2n}$ $⟹$ $U_{2n}$ = 2n - $V_{2n}$ ≤ 2n - n ≤ n (11.6)

$V_{2n}$ ≤ $W_{2n}$ $⟹$ 2n - $W_{2n}$ ≤ 2n - $V_{2n}$ = $U_{2n}$ (11.7)

By (11.5) for any integer n ≥ 2 :n $\le$ $V_{2n}$ lim $V_{2n}$ = +oo .

12 Lemma

We dissociate the following cases mod 6 for any even integer 2n n ≥ 3: p + q = 2n p, q ∈ Ƥ

If 2n = 6m then (p ; q) = (6r + 5 ; 6(m - r - 1) + 1) or (6r+1 ; 6(m - 1 - r) + 5)

If 2n = 6m + 2 then (p ; q) = ( 6r + 1 ; 6(m - r) + 1)

If 2n = 6m + 4 then (p ; q) = (6r + 5 ; 6(m- 1 - r) + 5)

Table : Sum of integers 1, 5 mod 6 (in $\mathbb{Z}$/6$\mathbb{Z}$).

p + q mod 6	1	5
1	2	0
5	0	4

(To adapt with 2n = 30m + k)

Table 1. 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29 mod 30 (in $\mathbb{Z}$/30$\mathbb{Z}$).

+ mod 30	1	7	11	13	17	19	23	29
1	2	8	12	14	18	20	24	0
7	8	14	18	20	24	26	0	6
11	12	18	22	24	28	0	4	10
13	14	20	24	26	0	2	6	12
17	18	24	28	0	4	6	10	16
19	20	26	0	2	6	8	12	18
23	24	0	4	6	10	12	16	22
29	0	6	10	12	16	18	22	28

Table 1. 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29 mod 30 (in $\mathbb{Z}$/30$\mathbb{Z}$).

+ mod 30	1	7	11	13	17	19	23	29
1	2	8	12	14	18	20	24	0
7	8	14	18	20	24	26	0	6
11	12	18	22	24	28	0	4	10
13	14	20	24	26	0	2	6	12
17	18	24	28	0	4	6	10	16
19	20	26	0	2	6	8	12	18
23	24	0	4	6	10	12	16	22
29	0	6	10	12	16	18	22	28

Proof.

13. Properties

For any integer k ≥ 2 there are infinitely many integers n │ $U_{2n}$ = $p_k$ (13.1) $V_{2n}$ ~ 2n (n $\to$ +oo)(13.2)

For any integer n ≥ 5000

${ U}_{2n}$ $\ll V_{2n}$and lim ( ${\displaystyle \frac{U_{2n}}{V_{2n}}}$ ) = 0(13.3)

The smallest integer n │$U_{2n}\ne$2n - $W_{2n}$ is obtained for n = 49 and $G_{98}$= (79 ; 19) (13.4)

( This type of terms increases in the Goldbach sequence ( $G_{2n}$) as n increases in the sense of the Schnirelmann density and there are an infinite number of them; their proportion per interval can be computed using the results given in ).

The sequence ( $G_{2n}$ ) is "extremal" in the sense that for any integer n $\ge 2$ (13.5)

$V_{2n}$ and $U_{2n}$ are the largest and smallest possible primes │ $U_{2n}$ + $V_{2n}$ = 2n.

The Cramer-Granville-Maier-Nicely conjecture [9,17,30],is verified with probability one. It leads to the following majorization

For any integer p ≥ 500

$U_{2p}$ ≤ 0.7 [${\mathrm{l}\mathrm{n}\left(2p\right)]}^{(2.2-{\displaystyle \frac{1}{p}})}$ (with probability one) (13.6)

The proof is similar to that of Lemma 9 and is validated by the studying functions of the type

f : x $\to$ a .g (x) + b${\left[\mathrm{l}\mathrm{n}\right(g\left(x\right)\left)\right]}^c$ ( a,b > 0 ; c > 2) with

g : x $\to$ 0.7 [l${\mathrm{n}\left(x\right)]}^{(c-{\displaystyle \frac{1}{x}})}$ and h : x $\to$ 0.7${\left[\mathrm{l}\mathrm{n}\right(x\left)\right]}^{(2.2-{\displaystyle \frac{1}{x}})}$ by using Maple software.

A better estimate can be obtained via [29,31],.

According to Bombieri and using the same method as in the proof of Lemma 9,

we obtain the following estimate of $U_{2n}$ $\forall$ $\epsilon$ > 0 $U_{2n}$ = O ( ${\mathrm{l}\mathrm{n}}^{1.3+\epsilon }(n$)) (on average) (13.7)

14. Algorithm

14.1. Algorithm written in natural language.

Inputs :

Input four integer variables : k, N, n, P

Input : $p_1$= 2 , $p_2$= 3 , $p_3$ = 5 , $p_4=$ 7 , ................., $p_N$ the first N primes.

   : n ← 3

   : P = M, R, G, S or T as indicated in paragraph 2

Algorithm body :

Compute : $W_{2n}$ = Sup( p $\in$ $\mathcal{P}$ : p ≤ 2n - 3 )

If ${\mathit{T}}_{2\mathit{n}}$= (2n - ${\mathit{W}}_{2\mathit{n}}$) is a prime

   $U_{2n}$←$T_{2n}$ and $V_{2n }$ ← $W_{2n}$ (14.1.1)

otherwise

If ${ \mathit{T}}_{2\mathit{n}}$ is a composite number

Let : k = 1

B.1) While$U_{2\left(n-k\right)}$ + 2k is a composite number

  assign to k the value k + 1 (k $⟵$ k + 1).

  return to B1)

End while

Assign to k the value $k_n$ ($k_n$ $⟵k$)

Let :

  $U_{2n}$ = $U_{2\left(n-k_n\right)}$ + 2$k_n$ and $V_{2n}$ = $V_{2\left(n-k_n\right)}$ (14.1.2)

Assign to n the value n + 1 (n$⟵ n+1$ and return to A)

End :

Outputs for integers less than ${10}^{4:}:$Print ( 2n = ● ; 2n - 3 = ● ; $W_{2n}$ = ● ; $T_{2n}$ = ● ; $V_{2n}$ = ● ; $U_{2n}$ = ● )

Outputs for large integers :

Print ( 2n - P = ● ; 2n - 3 - P = ● ; $W_{2n}$ - P = ● ; $T_{2n}$ = ● ; ${V_{2n}-P=\mathrm{●};U}_{2n}$ = ● )

14.2. Program written with Maxima software for 2n around ${10}^{1000}$

c: 10**1000 ; for n :c+40000 step 2   thru c+40100 do

(b:2,test : 0 , b :next_prime(b) ,e :n - b ,

if primep(e)

then print(n-c, b ,e - c)

else while test=0 do (e :n -b ,if primep(e)

then test:1 , print(n-c, b ,e - c)

else test : 0 ,b:next-prime(b));

14.3. Program written with Maplesoft Maple for 2n around ${10}^{1000}$

G := 10^1000:

V := [1, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29]:

A := G + 500000:

B := A + 59:

b:=2:

st := time( ):

for q from A by 6 to B do # Program modulo 30 .using the results of Lemma 11

Possibility of inverting the two loops or defining three similar structures with s := 0, 1, 2.

for s from 0 to 2 do

n := q + s + s:

b := trunc(0.59b - 20); # Improving computation time: the idea is to recognise that for any integer n large enough there exists a Goldbach decomponent ${p\mathrm{\text{'}}}_n$ and a successor ${p\mathrm{\text{'}}}_{n+1}$ such that

(E):│${p\mathrm{\text{'}}}_{n+1}$- ${p\mathrm{\text{'}}}_n$│< k.${\mathrm{l}\mathrm{n}}^2$(n) ; this reduces the number of ‘nextprime(●)’ operations which take up the most computing time.

( If G = ${10}^{500}$ : Computingtime is around 10 sec for thirty terms;The algorithm can be refined by exploiting frame (E). Cesàro averages can also be used to determine the initial condition for b).

t:= 0:

R := [[1, 5], [1], [5]]: Q := [[1, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29], [1, 13, 19], [11, 17, 23], [7, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29], [1, 7, 19], [11, 17, 23, 29], [1, 11, 13, 19, 23, 29], [1, 7, 13], [17, 23, 29], [1, 7, 11, 17, 19, 29], [1, 19, 7, 13], [11, 23, 29], [1, 23, 7, 17, 11, 13], [7, 19, 13], [11, 17, 29]]:

while t = 0 do .

b := nextprime(b + 100); # Additional test possible by improving Lemma 11. (with V mod 30).

# Possibility of replacing nextprime with a faster procedure ( see Sainty [37]).( the computation time is greatly reduced by replacing with b:=nextprime(b + k(b,G)), k(b,G) constant around 150 for G=${10}^{1000}$, k(b,G) chosen randomly with the rand procedure or very slowly increasing as a function of b and G ), but in general we don't obtain the E.G.D. but any Goldbach decomponents.

e := n - b;

K := e mod 6;

if K in R[s+1] then

if isprime(e)

Then  t := 1;

print(n - G, b, e - G);

end if;

end if;

end do:

end do:

end do:

Computingtime:= time( ) - st;

Comments : Possible test with gcd(n , b) = 1 and gcd(n , 2n - b) = 1 then isprime(b) and isprime(2n - b) may be faster than nextprime( ).

RESULTS :

G =${10}^{1000}$b: b:= nextprime(b+rand(100..150)) b:= nextprime(b+100) b:= nextprime(b+150)

n - G b n - G - b 500000, 54133, 445867 500002, 40693, 459309 500004, 422393, 77611 500006, 49157, 450849 500008, 222991, 277017 500010, 259451, 240559 500012, 521981, -21969 500014, 622561, -22547 500016, 342929, 157087 500018, 25097, 474921 500020, 95083, 404937 500022, 201821, 298201 500024, 226337, 273687 500026, 255859, 244167 500028, 8147, 491881 500030, 83833, 416197 500032, 43261, 456771 500034, 162251, 337783 500036, 179203, 320833 500038, 12601, 487437 500040, 608471,-108431 500042, 157103, 342939 500044, 145531, 354513 500046, 440303, 59743 500048, 162577, 337471 500050, 258637, 241413 500052, 111791, 388261 500054, 139661, 360393 500056, 126397, 373659 500058, 40739, 459319 500060, 106121, 393939 ComComputtime:= 179.343 sec

500000, 139387, 360613 500002, 40693, 459309 500004, 731447, -231443 500006, 54139, 445867 500008, 205651, 294357 500010, 100109, 399901 500012, 40693, 459319 500014, 261823, 238191 500016, 82913, 417103 500018, 300889, 199129 500020, 12583, 487437 500022, 233591, 266431 500024, 159871, 340153 500026, 106087, 393939 500028, 608459, -108431 500030, 30347, 469683 500032, 43261, 456771 500034, 201833, 298201 500036, 186859, 313177 500038, 95101, 404937 500040, 121763, 378277 500042, 9029, 491013 500044, 148663, 351381 500046, 304847, 195199 500048, 157109, 342939 500050, 40459, 459591 500052, 8171, 491881 500054, 223037, 277017 500056, 49207, 450849 500058, 301349, 198709 Computtime:= 188.250 sec

500000, 361069, 138931 500002, 40693, 459309 500004, 535637, -35633 500006, 277789, 222217 500008, 205651, 294357 500010, 138959, 361051 500012, 40693, 459319 500014, 145501, 354513 500016, 198659, 301357 500018, 26309, 473709 500020, 77347, 422673 500022, 160709, 339313 500024, 162553, 337471 500026, 106087, 393939 500028, 263009, 237019 500030, 151813, 348217 500032, 24049, 475983 500034, 400031, 100003 500036, 145037, 354999 500038, 854257, -354219 500040, 121763, 378277 500042, 8161, 491881 500044, 145987, 354057 500046, 304847, 195199 500048, 12611, 487437 500050, 163729, 336321 500052, 100151, 399901 500054, 155291, 344763 500056, 126397, 373659 500058, 208277, 291781 500060, 67547, 432513 Computime:= 163.828 sec

b:= nextprime(b+rand(150..175)) b:= nextprime(b+rand(140..160))

n-G b n-b-G	n-G b n-b-G
500000, 139387, 360613 500002, 90481, 409521 500004, 422393, 77611 500006, 145007, 354999 500008, 604339, -104331 500010, 138959, 361051 500012, 221021, 278991 500014, 334843, 165171 500016, 297779, 202237 500018, 167267, 332751 500020, 54577, 445443 500022, 139409, 360613 500024, 336491, 163533 500026, 12589, 487437 500028, 263009, 237019 500030, 145517, 354513 500032, 334861, 165171 500034, 163697, 336337 500036, 318979, 181057 500038, 221047, 278991 500040, 761591, -261551 500042, 178691, 321351 500044, 54601, 445443 500046, 174989, 325057 500048, 84229, 415819 500050, 163729, 336321 500052, 159899, 340153 500054, 155291, 344763 500056, 166183, 333873 500058, 151841, 348217 Computtime:= 174.438 sec	500000, 112429,-387571 500002, 40693, 459309 500004, 277787, 222217 500006, 82903, 417103 500008, 148627, 351381 500010, 139397, 360613 500012, 40693, 459319 500014, 145501, 354513 500016, 388313, 111703 500018, 258329, 241689 500020, 77347, 422673 500022, 453683, 46339 500024, 67511, 432513 500026, 221197, 278829 500028, 263009, 237019 500030, 112459, 387571 500032, 178681, 321351 500034, 208253, 291781 500036, 274019, 226017 500038, 14071, 485967 500040, 162257, 337783 500042, 361111, 138931 500044, 52903, 447141 500046, 582299, -82253 500048, 8167, 491881 500050, 67537, 432513 500052, 111791, 388261 500054, 126641, 373413 500056, 126397, 373659 500058, 40739, 459319 Computtime:= 138.578 sec	Record : 116 sec; see in researchgate files PDFGOLDBACHTEST4,10 (For n from G+5000000 to 5000058 by 2), [37].

500000, 9473, 490527

500002, 24019, 475983

500004, 8123, 491881

500006, 9479, 490527

500008, 25087, 474921

500010, 57917, 442093

500012, 8999, 491013

500014, 9001, 491013

500016, 40697, 459319

500018, 9491, 490527

500020, 9007, 491013

500022, 139409, 360613

500024, 9011, 491013

500026, 9013, 491013

500028, 8147, 491881

500030, 26321, 473709

500032, 24049, 475983

500034, 54167, 445867

500036, 57943, 442093

500038, 9511, 490527

500040, 57947, 442093

500042, 8161, 491881

500044, 24061, 475983

500046, 162263, 337783

500048, 8167, 491881

500050, 12613, 487437

500052, 8171, 491881

500054, 9041, 491013

500056, 9043, 491013

500058, 40739, 459319

Computingtime : 343.453 sec

G = ${10}^{2000}$ n - G n - b - G b  n - G b n - b - G

40000, 39957, 43 40050, 86117, -46067

40002, 39091, 911 40052, 503, 39549

40004, 39957, 47 40054, 97, 39957

40006, 39549, 457 40056, 89393, -49337

40008, 25369, 14639 40058, 101, 39957

40010, 39957, 53 40060, 103, 39957

40012, 39549, 463 40062, 971, 39091

40014, 17737, 22277 40064, 107, 39957

40016, 39957, 59 40066, 109, 39957

40018, 39957, 61 40068, 977, 39091

40020, 39091, 929 40070, 113, 39957

40022, 39141, 881 40072, 523, 39549

40024, 39957, 67 40074, 983, 39091

40026, 35443, 4583 40076, 16937, 23139

40028, 39957, 71 40078, 937, 39141

40030, 39957, 73 40080, 4637, 35443

40032, 39091, 94140082, 941, 39141

40034, 35443, 4591 40084, 127, 39957

40036, 39957, 79 40086, 4643, 35443

40038, 39091, 947 40088, 131, 39957

40040, 39957, 83 40090, 541, 39549

40042, 23139, 16903 40092, 4649, 35443

40044, 39091, 953 40094, 137, 39957

40046, 39957, 89 40096, 139, 39957

40048, 39549, 499 40098, 31991, 8107

40100, 1009, 39091

G = ${10}^{3000}$ n - G b n - b - G

100000, 36529, 63471

100002, 77069, 22933

100004, 22717, 77287

100006, 181873, -81867

100008, 12239, 87769

100010, 4547, 95463

100012, 4549, 95463

100014, 22727, 77287

100016, 59497, 40519

100018, 24847, 75171

100020, 12251, 87769

100022, 12253, 87769

100024, 4561, 95463

100026, 22739, 77287

100028, 22741, 77287

100030, 4567, 95463

100032, 12263, 87769

100034, 36563, 63471

100036, 42649, 57387

100038, 12269, 87769

100040, 23143, 76897

100042, 36571, 63471

100044, 43973, 56071

100046, 4583, 95463

100048, 24877, 75171

100050, 12281, 87769

G = ${10}^{5000}$n - G b n - b - G n - G b n - b - Gn - G b n - b - G

100000, 31147, 68853100050, 12611, 87439 100100, 31247, 68853

100002, 309371, -209369 100052, 12613, 87439 100102, 31249, 68853

100104, 105071, -4967

100106, 13649, 86457

100004, 31151, 68853 100054, 13597, 86457 100108, 640669, -540561

100006, 31153, 68853 100056, 105023, -4967 100110, 12671, 87439

100008, 12569, 87439 100058, 12619, 87439100112, 31259, 68853

100114, 87991, 12123

100116, 122033, -21917

100118, 18379, 81739

100010, 13553, 86457 100060, 54151, 45909

100012, 31159, 68853 100062, 108971, -8909

100014, 108923, -8909 100064, 103091, -3027

100016, 12577, 87439 100066, 87943, 12123

100018, 592237, -492219100068, 18329, 81739

100020, 104987, -4967 100070, 13613, 86457

100022, 12583, 87439 100072, 31219, 68853

100024, 13567, 86457 100074, 264881, -

100026, 18287, 81739 100076, 12637, 87439

100028, 12589, 87439 100078, 107971, -7893

100030, 31177, 68853 100080, 12641, 87439

100032, 61871, 38161 100082, 76913, 23169

100034, 13577, 86457 100084, 13627, 86457

100036, 31183, 68853 100086, 12647, 87439100038, 108947, -8909 10038, 108947, -8909 100088, 61927, 38161

100040, 12601, 87439 100090, 13633, 86457

100042, 31189, 68853 100092, 12653, 87439

100044, 457091, -357047100094, 61933, 38161

100046, 18307, 81739 100096, 87973, 12123

100048, 13591, 86457 100098, 12659, 87439

100120, 31267, 68853

100122, 61961, 38161

100124, 31271, 68853

100126, 13669, 86457

100128, 12689, 87439

100130, 31277, 68853

100132, 76963, 23169

100134, 122051, -21917

100136, 12697, 87439

100138, 13681, 86457

100140, 18401, 81739

100142, 12703, 87439

100144, 13687, 86457

100146, 152993, -52847

100148, 13691, 86457

100150, 13693, 86457

1000000, 35509, 964491

1000002, 113, 999889

1000004, 69193, 930811

1000006, 95233, 904773

1000008, 69197, 930811

1000010, 31873, 968137

1000012, 35521, 964491

1000014, 69203, 930811

1000016, 127, 999889

1000018, 35527, 964491

1000020, 131, 999889

Maple program corrected and improved by the online code checker (IA) : CODEGPT , Yihao.com and AI CLAUDE, (see Sainty [37]).

15. Appendix

Application of Algorithm 14 : Table of extreme Goldbach partitions ${\mathit{U}}_{2\mathit{n}}$ and ${\mathit{V}}_{2\mathit{n} }$ computed from program 14.2 ( 2 ≤ 2n ≤ ${10}^{1000}$ + 4020 ).

The ** sign in the table below indicates the results given by the algorithm 14 in case B) of return to the previous terms of the sequence ($G_{2n})$.

WATCH OUT !

To simplify the display of large numbers n ( 2n >${ 10}^9$ ) the results are entered as follows :

2n - P , (2n - 3) - P ,${\mathit{W}}_{2\mathit{n}}$ - P , ${\mathit{T}}_{2\mathit{n}}$, ${\mathit{V}}_{2\mathit{n}}$- P and ${\mathit{U}}_{2\mathit{n}}$with

P = M, R, G, S, or T constants defined in (2.3)

2n 2n - 3	${\mathit{W}}_{2\mathit{n}}$	${\mathit{T}}_{2\mathit{n}}$=2n -${\mathbf{W}}_{2\mathbf{n}}$	${\mathit{V}}_{2\mathit{n}}$	${\mathit{U}}_{2\mathit{n}}$
4 1	X	X	2	2
6 3	3	3	3	3
8 5	5	3	5	3
1 10 7	7	3	7	3
112 9	7	5	7	5
14 11	11	3	11	3
16 13	13	3	13	3
18 15	13	5	13	5
20 17	17	3	17	3
22 19	19	3	19	3
24 21	19	5	19	5
26 23	23	3	23	3
28 25	23	5	23	5
30 27	23	7	23	7
32 29	29	3	29	3
34 31	31	3	31	3
36 33	31	5	31	5
38 35	31	7	31	7
40 37	37	3	37	3
80 77	73	7	73	7
82 79	79	3	79	3
84 81	79	5	79	5
86 83	83	3	83	3
88 85	83	5	83	5
90 87	83	7	83	7
92 89	89	3	89	3
94 91	89	5	89	5
96 93	89	7	89	7
**98 95	89	9	79	19
10097	97	3	97	3
120117	113	7	113	7
**122 119	113	9	109	13
124121	113	11	113	11
126123	113	13	113	13
**128 125	113	15	109	19
130127	127	3	127	3
132129	127	5	127	5
134131	131	3	131	3
136133	131	5	131	5
138135	131	7	131	7
140137	137	3	137	3
**500 497	491	9	487	13
502499	499	3	499	3
504501	499	5	499	5
506503	503	3	503	3
508505	503	5	503	5
510507	503	7	503	7
1000 997	997	3	997	3
1002 999	997	5	997	5
1004 1001	997	7	997	7
**1006 1003	997	9	983	23
1008 1005	997	11	997	11
1010 1007	997	13	997	13
1012 1009	1009	3	1009	3
1014 1011	1009	5	1009	5
1016 1013	1013	3	1013	3
1018 1015	1013	5	1013	5
10002 9999	9973	29	9973	29
10004 10001	9973	31	9973	31
**10006 10003	9973	33	9923	83
**10008 10005	9973	35	9967	41
10010 10007	10007	3	10007	3
10012 10009	10009	3	10009	3
10014 10011	10009	5	10009	5
10016 10013	10009	7	10009	7
**10018 10015	10009	9	10007	11
10020 10017	10009	11	10009	11
2n - M (2n - 3) - M	${\mathit{W}}_{2\mathit{n}}$- M	${\mathit{T}}_{2\mathit{n}}$= 2n -${\mathit{W}}_{2\mathit{n}}$	${\mathit{V}}_{2\mathit{n}}$- M	${\mathit{U}}_{2\mathit{n}}$
+1000 +997	+993	7	+993	7
**+1002 +999	+993	9	+931	71
+1004 +1001	+993	11	+993	11
+1006 +1003	+993	13	+993	13
**+1008+1005	+993	15	+919	89
+1010 +1007	+993	17	+993	17
+1012 +1009	+993	19	+993	19
+1014 +1011	+1011	3	+1011	3
+1016 +1013	+1011	5	+1011	5
+1018 +1015	+1011	7	+1011	7
**+1020+1017	+1011	9	+931	89
2n - R (2n - 3) - R	${\mathit{W}}_{2\mathit{n}}$- R	${\mathit{T}}_{2\mathit{n}}$= 2n -${\mathit{W}}_{2\mathit{n}}$	${\mathit{V}}_{2\mathit{n}}$- R	${\mathit{U}}_{2\mathit{n}}$
**+1000 +997	+979	21	+903	97
+1002 +999	+979	23	+979	23
**+1004 +1001	+979	25	+951	53
**+1006+1003	+979	27	+903	103
+1008 +1005	+979	29	+979	29
+1010 +1007	+979	31	+979	31
**+1012+1009	+979	33	+951	61
**+1014+1011	+979	35	+ 781	233
+1016 +1013	+979	37	+979	37
**+1018 +1015	+979	39	+951	67
+1020+1017	+1017	3	+1017	3
2n - G (2n - 3) - G	${\mathit{W}}_{2\mathit{n}}$- G	${\mathit{T}}_{2\mathit{n}}$= 2n -${\mathit{W}}_{2\mathit{n}}$	$V_{2n}$- G	${\mathit{U}}_{2\mathit{n}}$
**+10000 +9997	+9631	369	+7443	2557
**+10002 +9999	+9631	371	+9259	743
+10004 +10001	+9631	373	+9631	373
**+10006 +10003	+9631	375	+8583	1423
**+10008 + 10005	+9631	377	+6637	3371
+10010 +10007	+9631	379	+9631	379
**+10012 +10009	+9631	381	+8583	1429
+10014 +10011	+9631	383	+9631	383
**+10016 +10013	+9631	385	+9259	757
**+10018 +10015	+9631	387	+4491	5527
+10020 +10017	+9631	389	+9631	389
2n-S (2n-3)-S	${\mathit{W}}_{2\mathit{n}}$- S	${\mathit{T}}_{2\mathit{n}}$= 2n -${\mathit{W}}_{2\mathit{n}}$	${\mathit{V}}_{2\mathit{n}}$- S	${\mathit{U}}_{2\mathit{n}}$
**+20000 +19997	+18031	1969	+17409	2591
**+20002 +19999	+18031	1971	+ 17409	2593
+20004 +20001	+18031	1973	+18031	1973
**+20006 +20003	+18031	1975	+16663	3343
**+20008 +20005	+18031	1977	+16941	3067
+20010 +20007	+18031	1979	+18031	1979
**+20012 +20009	+18031	1981	+5671	14341
**+20014 +20011	+18031	1983	+4101	15913
**+20016 +20013	+18031	1985	+3229	16787
+20018 +20015	+18031	1987	+18031	1987
**+20020 +20017	+18031	1989	+16941	3079
2n-T (2n-3)-T	${\mathit{W}}_{2\mathit{n}}$-T	${\mathit{T}}_{2\mathit{n}}$= 2n -${\mathit{W}}_{2\mathit{n}}$	${\mathit{V}}_{2\mathit{n}}-\mathit{T}$	${\mathit{U}}_{2\mathit{n}}$
**+40000 +39997	+29737	10263	+ 21567	18433
**+40002 +39999	+29737	10265	+22273	17729
+40004 +40001	+29737	10267	+29737	10267
**+40006 +40003	+29737	10269	+21567	18439
+40008 +40005	+29737	10271	+29737	10271
+40010 + 40007	+29737	10273	+29737	10273
**+40012 +40009	+29737	10275	+10401	29611
**+40014 +40011	+29737	10277	-56003	96017
**+40016 +40013	+29737	10279	+27057	12959
**+40018 +40015	+29737	10281	+25947	14071
**+40020 +40017	+29737	10283	+24493	15527

16. Appendix

7-3=4	11-5=6	11-3=8	13-3=10	17-5=12	17-3=14	19-3=16	23-5=18
23-3=20	29-7=22	29-5=24	29-3=26	31-3=28	37-7=30	37-5=32	37-3=34
41-5=36	41-3=38	43-3=40	47-5=42	47-3=44	53-7=46	53-5=48	53-3=50
59-7=52	59-5=54	59-3=56	61-3=58	67-7=60	67-5=62	67-3=64	71-5=66
71-3=68	73-3=70	79-7=72	79-5=74	79-3=76	83-5=78	83-3=80	89-7=82
89-5=84	89-3=86	101-13=88	97-7=90	97-5=92	97-3=94	101-5=96	101-3=98
103-3=100	107-5=102	107-3=104	109-3=106	113-5=108	113-3=110	131-19=112	127-13=114
127-11=116	131-13=118	127-7=120	127-5=122	127-3=124	131-5=126	131-3=128	137-7=130
137-5=132	137-3=134	139-3=136	149-11=138	151-11=140	149-7=142	149-5=144	149-3=146
151-3=148	157-7=150	157-5=152	157-3=154	163-7=156	163-5=158	163-3=160	167-5=162
167-3=164	173-7=166	173-5=168	173-3=170	179-7=172	179-5=174	179-3=176	181-3=178
191-11=180	193-11=182	191-7=184	191-5=186	191-3=188	193-3=190	197-5=192	197-3=194
199-3=196	211-13=198	211-11=200	233-31=202	211-7=204	211-5=206	211-3=208	223-13=210
229-17=212	227-13=214	223-7=216	223-5=218	223-3=220	227-5=222	227-3=224	229-3=226
233-5=228	233-3=230	239-7=232	239-5=234	239-3=236	241-3=238	251-11=240	271-29=242
251-7=244	251-5=246

17. Appendix

${\mathit{T}}_{\mathit{r}}$(K)

	${\mathit{q}}_1$= 3	${\mathit{q}}_2$= 5	${\mathit{q}}_3$= 7	${\mathit{q}}_4$= 11	${\mathit{q}}_5$= 13	${\mathit{q}}_6$= 17	${\mathit{q}}_7$= 19	${\mathit{q}}_8$= 23	${\mathit{q}}_9$= 29	${\mathit{q}}_{10}$= 31	${\mathit{q}}_{11}$=37
2K = 2	5	7		13		19			31
2K = 4	7		11		17		23				41
2K = 6		11	13	17	19	23		29		37	43
2K = 8	11	13		19				31	37
2K = 10	13				23		29			41	47
2K = 12		17	19	23		29	31		41	43
2K =14	17	19				31		37	43
2K = 16	19		23		29					47	59
2K = 18		23		29	31		37	41	47		61
2K =20	23			31		37		43			67
2K=22			29				41			53
2K=24		29	31		37	41	43	47	53		71
2K=26	29	31		37		43					73
2K=28	31				41		47			59
2K=30			37	41	43	47		53	59	61
2K=32		37		43					61		79
2K=34	37		41		47		53
2K=36		41	43	47		53		59		67	83
2K=38	41	43						61	67
2K=40	43		47		53		59			71
2K=42		47		53		59	61		71	73	89
2K=44	47					61		67	73
2K=46			53		59
2K=48		53		59	61		67	71		79
2K=50	53			61		67		73	79		97
2K=52			59				71			83
2K=54		59	61		67	71	73		83
2K=56	59	61		67		73		79
2K=58	61				71					89
2K=60			67	71	73		79	83	89

18. Perspectives and generalizations

18.1 Other Goldbach sequences (${G^{\prime }}_{2n}$) independent of $\left(G_{2n}\right)$ may be studied using the increasing sequences of primes ( ${W^{\prime }}_{2n} )$ defined by

For any integer n $\ge 3$ ${W\mathrm{\text{'}}}_{2n}$ = Sup ( p$\mathsf{ϵ}\mathcal{P}:p\le$ f (n) ) (18.1.1)

f is a function defined on the interval J = [3 ; +$\mathrm{\infty }$[ and satisfying the following conditions

● f is strictly increasing on the interval J

● f (3) = 3 and $\underset{x\to +\infty }{\lim }f\left(x\right)$ = +$\mathrm{\infty }$● $\forall x\mathsf{ϵ}If\left(x\right)\le 2x-3$

For example, one of the following functions defined on J can be selected.

■ f : x $\to$a x + 3 - 3a(a$\in \mathbb{R}$ : 0 < a$\le 2)$

■ g : x$\to$[ 4$\sqrt{3x}-$9 ] ( [x] is the integer part of the real x )

■ h : x $\to 6\mathrm{l}\mathrm{n}\left({\displaystyle \frac{x}{3}}\right)$ + 3

18.2 Using this method it would be interesting to study the Schnirelmann density of primes 3 , 5 , 7, 11 ,........ ... in the sequence ( $U_{2n }$) on variable intervals and the Caesaro sums of $U_{2n}$ E.D.G.’s with a view to more efficient programming for their calculation.

18.3 It is possible to exceed the values shown in the table of 2n = ${10}^{1000 }$ ( Many E.G.D have been calculated for values of 2n in the order of ${10}^{2000}$, ${10}^{5000}$ (and G.D. in the order of ${10}^{10000}$ Sainty ) by perfecting this algorithm, exploiting the fact that one of Goldbach's decomponents can be chosen equal to 4p + 3, (G.D. are primes of the form 6m + 1 or 6m + 5 and can be expressed more precisely using primes of the form 30m + r :

r ∈ [1,7,11,13,17,19,23,29] (see Table mod 30, Lemma 11) ,by using De Pocklington Theorem [6,34],, Primality tests [37], Cipolla-Axler-Dusart type functions and improvment of primes frames [2,8,12,13], via a new Prime number Theorem to better identify the terms of (${ G}_{2n }),$ supercomputers and more efficients software as C++, or Assembleur compilation.

18.4 Any Goldbach decomponent of order 2n = ${10}^{10000}$ can be determined more quickly by replacing the instruction b:=2 by b:=trunc(c.b + d) and b := nextprime(b) with

b := nextprime(b + k(b, G)), where k(b, G) is a constant of around 150 for G = 10¹⁰⁰⁰ and is chosen randomly using the rand procedure or increases very slowly as a function of b and G. An increasing sequence of primes, $b_k$, can also be determined in stages by replacing the initial value b:=2 by b:=trunc($k_0.$b - $k_1$.${\mathrm{l}\mathrm{n}}^{\mathrm{s}}$(n) - $k_2$) and by setting c := trunc( a.${\mathrm{l}\mathrm{n}}^d$(b) ),

1 ≤ d ≤ 2 and b := b + c for each stage, followed by b := nextprime(b) until the next stage, ( see Sainty ); Note that for any even integer 2n large enough there exists G.D. ${p^{\prime }}_n$ , ${p^{\prime }}_{n+1}$ , ${q^{\prime }}_n$ , ${q^{\prime }}_{n+1}$│ ${ p^{\prime }}_n$ + ${q^{\prime }}_n$ = 2n and ${p^{\prime }}_{n+1}$ + ${q^{\prime }}_{n+1}$ = 2( n + 1 ) with

${p^{\prime }}_{n+1 }$- ${p^{\prime }}_n$ and ${q^{\prime }}_{n+1}$ - ${q^{\prime }}_n$ < k.${\mathrm{l}\mathrm{n}}^2$(n)). It is therefore advisable to develop adaptive algorithms based on this model using A.I., as a function of the program's G parameter.

18.5 Diophantine equations and conjectures of the same nature ((3L) conjecture [9,21,23,26,27],) can be processed using similar reasoning and algorithms.

▄ To validate the (3L) conjecture we study the following sequences of primes ( W$l_{2n}$ ), (${ Vl}_{2n} )$and (${Ul}_{2n} )$defined by

For any integer $n\ge 3{Wl}_{2n}$= Sup ( p $\mathsf{ϵ}\mathcal{P}:p\le n-1)$ (18.5.1)

● If ${Tl}_{2n }$= ( 2n + 1 - 2 ${Wl}_{2n}$) is a prime

then let

${ Vl}_{2n}$= ${Wl}_{2n}$ and ${ Ul}_{2n}$= ${Tl}_{2n}$ (18.5.2)

● If ${Tl}_{2n}$ is a composite number

then there exists an integer k 1 $\le k\le n-3 │$${Ul}_{2\left(n-k\right)}$ + 2k ∈ $\mathcal{P}$ (18.5.3)

then let

${Vl}_{2n}$= ${Vl}_{2\left(n-k\right)}$ and ${Ul}_{2n}$=${Ul}_{2\left(n-k\right)}$+ 2k (18.5.4)

▄ Using the same type of reasoning a generalization, the (BBG) conjecture of the following form can be validated

● Let K and Q be two odd integers prime to each other :

For any integer n │ 2n$\ge 3$(K + Q ) there exist two primes ${Ub}_{2n}$ and ${Vb}_{2n}$ verifying

K . ${Ub}_{2n}$ + Q. ${Vb}_{2n}$ = 2n (18.5.5)

● Let K and Q be two integers of different parity prime to each other :

For any integer n │ 2n $\ge 3$(K + Q ) there are two primes ${Ub}_{2n}$ and ${ Vb}_{2n}$ verifying

K ${.Ub}_{2n}$ + Q .${Vb}_{2n}$ = 2n + 1 (18.5.6)

18.6 Remark.

GOLDBACH (-) :

$R_{2K}$ = Inf ( p ∈ $\mathcal{P}$ : p - 2K ∈ $\mathcal{P}$) and $Q_{2K}$= Inf ( p ∈ $\mathcal{P}$: 2K + p ∈ $\mathcal{P}$) = $R_{2K}$ - 2K

GOLDBACH (+) :

$V_{2K}$ = Sup ( p ∈ $\mathcal{P}$: 2K - p ∈ $\mathcal{P}$) and $U_{2K}$= Inf ( p ∈ $\mathcal{P}$ : 2K - p ∈ $\mathcal{P}$) = 2K - $V_{2K}$(It is possible to envisage symmetries in the Goldbach triangle).

18.7 The sequences (${Wq}_{2n}$) generate all the G.D. and may enable us to better estimate the values of distribution function G of the Goldbach's Comet, probably of type :

$a_1{\displaystyle \frac{E}{{\mathrm{l}\mathrm{n}}^2\left(E\right)}}$ < G(E) < $a_2{\displaystyle \frac{E}{{\mathrm{l}\mathrm{n}}^2\left(E\right)}}$ , see Woon .

19. Conclusion

19.1 A recurrent and explicit Goldbach sequence ( $G_{2n}$ ) = (${ U}_{2n }$; $V_{2n}$) verifying

$\forall$ n ∈ $\mathbb{N}+2$ $U_{2n}$ , $V_{2n}$ ∈ $\mathcal{P}$ $\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}{U}_{2n}$ +$V_{2n}$= 2n

has been developed using an simple and efficient "localised" algorithm. The Goldbach conjecture has been proved by strong recurrence (absurd and finite descent), and a relation (Proposition 10) is established between the fundamental theorem of arithmetic and the Goldbach conjecture (sum and product of primes), allowing fast computation of G.D. of very large even integers using a generalized Pocklington-type algorithm and perhaps another demonstration of Goldbach's conjecture via the decomposition of 2n into prime factors.

19.2 The records of Silva and Deshouillers, te Riele, Saouter are beaten on a personal computer. Hundreds E.G.D. $U_{2n}$ and $V_{2n }$ are obtained for values around 2n =${ 10}^{1000 }$ , twenty-six around 2n =${ 10}^{2000 },$ seventy-five around 2n =${ 10}^{5000 }$ and G.D. around 2n = ${ 10}^{10000 }$ for a computation time of less than three hours (see Sainty ).

19.3 For a given integer n ≥ 49 the evaluation of the terms $U_{2n}$ and $V_{2n}$ does not require the computing of all previous terms $U_{2k}$ and $V_{2k}$ │ 1 $\le$k < n - 1 . we will only consider those that verify :

$U_{2k}$≤ 5.${\mathrm{l}\mathrm{n}}^{1.3}\left(2n\right)$ and 2n - 5.${\mathrm{l}\mathrm{n}}^{1.3}$(2n) ≤ $V_{2k }$≤ 2n(on average) (19.3.1)

This property allows any E.G.D $U_{2n}$ and $V_{2n}$ to be calculated quite quickly, the upper limit being defined by the scientific software and the computer's ability to determine the largest prime preceding 2n - 2 (next or prevprime(2n - 2) function).

19.4 Therefore the (BBG), the (3L) and the binary Goldbach(- / +) conjectures "Any even integer greater than three is the sum and difference of two primes" are true.

In fact these two conjectures are intertwined.

Framing and mean value of the Goldbach comet by functions of the type f : x -> a.x /${\mathbf{l}\mathbf{n}}^2$(x) , ( via AI CLAUDE : to be specified ).

Comments :

The majority of mathematicians believe Goldbach's conjecture to be true, mainly,, based on statistical reasoning centred on the distribution of primes. The larger the number, the more ways there are to decompose it into a sum of two or three other primes. A crude heuristic approach to this argument (for the Binary Goldbach Conjecture) is to consider the prime number theorem, this states that a randomly chosen integer m has a probability of being prime equal to 1/ln(m).

. Therefore, if n is a large even integer and m is a number between 3 and n, the probability that both m and (n - m) are primes is approximately 1/(ln(n).ln(n - m)). Although this heuristic argument is imperfect for several reasons, such as the lack of consideration of correlations between the probabilities of m and (n – m) being primes, it nevertheless indicates that the total number of ways of writing a large even integer n as the sum of two odd primes is approximately proportional to n / ${\mathit{l}\mathit{n}}^2$(n).