Submitted:
20 September 2024
Posted:
26 September 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Plant Materials
2.2. Sterilisation
2.3. Media Preparation
2.4. Callus Induction
2.5. Copper Exposure to Calli Using CuSO4∙5H2O Solution
2.6. Cu Analysis in Callus by AAS
2.7. Parameters’ Calculation
2.7.1. Callus Growth
2.7.2. Dry Weight (g)
2.7.3. Tolerance Index (TI, %)
2.7.4. Bioaccumulation Factor (BCF)
2.8. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Callus Cu Accumulation
3.2. Callus Growth
3.3. Fresh Weight and Dry Weight
3.4. Tolerance index (TI) and Bioaccumulation Factor (BCF)
3.5. Two-Way ANOVA Outcomes
4. Discussion
4.1. Callus Parameters as Indicators of Copper Toxicity
4.2. Biomass Reduction and Sensitivity Thresholds
4.3. High Copper Concentrations Override Varietal Differences
4.4. Extrapolation to Soil-Plant Systems
4.5. Implications for Agricultural Practices and Soil Health
4.6. Limitations And Future Research Directions
5. Conclusions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
References
- United Fresh New Zealand Incorporated. Fresh Facts: New Zealand Horticulture 2020. Freshfacts 2020. https://www.freshfacts.co.nz/files/freshfacts-2020.pdf.
- Girotto, E.; Ceretta, C. A.; Brunetto, G.; Miotto, A.; Tiecher, T. L.; De Conti, L.; Lourenzi, C. R.; Lorensini, F.; Gubiani, P. I.; da Silva, L. S.; Nicoloso, F. T. Copper availability assessment of Cu-contaminated vineyard soils using black oat cultivation and chemical extractants. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2014, 186(12), 9051–9063. [CrossRef]
- Komárek, M.; Čadková, E.; Chrastný, V.; Bordas, F.; Bollinger, J. C. Contamination of vineyard soils with fungicides: A review of environmental and toxicological aspects. Environ. Int. 2010, 36(1), 138-151. [CrossRef]
- Liu, C. S.; Sun, B. Y.; Kan, S. H.; Zhang, Y. Z.; Deng, S. H.; Yang, G. Copper toxicity and accumulation in potted seedlings of three apple rootstock species: Implications for safe fruit production on copper-polluted soils. Journal of Plant Nutrition 2011, 34(9), 1268–1277. [CrossRef]
- Li, W.; Zhang, M.; Shu, H. Distribution and Fractionation of Copper in Soils of Apple Orchards. Environ Sci & Pollut Res 2005, 12(3), 168–172. [CrossRef]
- Michigan State University. https://www.canr.msu.edu/news/an_early_season_copper_application_will_help_avoid_feeling_the_blue s_about (accessed on 20 September 2023).
- Vanneste, J. L. Fire Blight. The Disease and Its Causative Agent, Erwinia Amylovora: Migration of Erwinia amylovora in Host Plant Tissues, CABI Pub 2000, 73-81. https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.5555/20001008052.
- Norelli, J. L.; Jones, A. L.; Aldwinckle, H. S. Fire Blight Management in the Twenty-first Century Using New Technologies that Enhance Host Resistance in Apple. In Plant Disease 2003, 87(7).
- Bouazizi, H.; Jouili, H.; Geitmann, A.; El Ferjani, E. Copper toxicity in expanding leaves of Phaseolus vulgaris L.: Antioxidant enzyme response and nutrient element uptake. Ecotoxi. Environ. Safety 2010, 73(6), 1304–1308. [CrossRef]
- Brunetto, G.; Bastos de Melo, G. W.; Terzano, R.; Del Buono, D.; Astolfi, S.; Tomasi, N.; Pii, Y.; Mimmo, T.; Cesco, S. Copper accumulation in vineyard soils: Rhizosphere processes and agronomic practices to limit its toxicity. Chemo. 2016, 162, 293–307. [CrossRef]
- Cambrollé, J.; García, J. L.; Figueroa, M. E.; Cantos, M. Evaluating wild grapevine tolerance to copper toxicity. Chemo. 2015, 120,171-178. [CrossRef]
- Chatterjee, J.; Chatterjee, C. Phytotoxicity of cobalt, chromium and copper in cauliflower. Environ. Pollut. 2000, 109(1), 69–74. [CrossRef]
- Chen, J.; Liu, Y. Q.; Yan, X. W.; Wei, G. H.; Zhang, J. H.; Fang, L. C. Rhizobium inoculation enhances copper tolerance by affecting copper uptake and regulating the ascorbate-glutathione cycle and phytochelatin biosynthesis-related gene expression in Medicago sativa seedlings. Ecotoxi. Environ. Safety 2018, 162(March), 312–323. [CrossRef]
- Hippler, F. W. R.; Cipriano, D. O.; Boaretto, R. M.; Quaggio, J. A.; Gaziola, S. A.; Azevedo, R. A.; Mattos-Jr., D. Citrus rootstocks regulate the nutritional status and antioxidant system of trees under copper stress. Environ. Experimen. Botany 2016, 130, 42–52. [CrossRef]
- Wang, Q.; Liu, J.; Wang, Y.; Yu, H. Accumulations of copper in apple orchard soils: distribution and availability in soil aggregate fractions. J. Soil Sedi. 2015, 15(5), 1075–1082. [CrossRef]
- Cao, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, C.; Li, H.; Zhang, J.; Chen, G. Growth, physiological responses, and copper accumulation in seven willow species exposed to Cu—a hydroponic experiment. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25(20), 19875–19886. [CrossRef]
- Lange, B.; Delhaye, G.; Boisson, S.; Verbruggen, N.; Meerts, P.; Faucon, M. P. Variation in copper and cobalt tolerance and accumulation among six populations of the facultative metallophyte Anisopappus chinensis (Asteraceae). Environ. Experimen. Botany 2018, 153(October 2017), 1–9. [CrossRef]
- Marastoni, L.; Sandri, M.; Pii, Y.; Valentinuzzi, F.; Brunetto, G.; Cesco, S.; Mimmo, T. Synergism and antagonisms between nutrients induced by copper toxicity in grapevine rootstocks: Monocropping vs. intercropping. Chemo. 2019, 214, 563–578. [CrossRef]
- Wan, H.; Du, J.; He, J.; Lyu, D.; Li, H. Copper accumulation, subcellular partitioning and physiological and molecular responses in relation to different copper tolerance in apple rootstocks. Tree Physio. 2019, 39(7), 1215–1234. [CrossRef]
- Imeri, R.; Kullaj, E.; Duhani, E.; Millaku, L. Impact of rootstock on heavy metal bioaccumulation in apple plant grown near an industrial source in Obiliq, Kosovo. Agro. Res. 2019, 17(1), 100–110. [CrossRef]
- Errabii, T.; Gandonou, C. B.; Essalmani, H.; Abrini, J.; Idaomar, M.; Skali Senhaji, N. Effects of NaCl and mannitol induced stress on sugarcane (Saccharum sp.) callus cultures. Acta Phys. Plant. 2007, 29(2), 95–102. [CrossRef]
- Skoog, F.; Miller, C. O. Chemical regulation of growth and organ formation in plant tissues cultured in vitro. Sympo. S. Experiment. Bio. 1957, 11, 118–131. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/13486467/.
- Fehér, A. Callus, dedifferentiation, totipotency, somatic embryogenesis: What these terms mean in the era of molecular plant biology? Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10(April), 1–11. [CrossRef]
- Gladkov, E. A. Cell selection to increase lawn grass resistance to lead pollution. Environ. Sci. Pollut. R. 2023, 30, 24771–24778. [CrossRef]
- Gori, P.; Schiff, S.; Santandrea, G.; Bennici, A. Response of in vitro cultures of Nicotiana tabacum L. to copper stress and selection of plants from Cu-tolerant callus. Plant Cell Tiss. Organ. Cult. 1998, 53, 161–169. [CrossRef]
- Murashige, T.; Skoog, F. A. Revised Medium for Rapid Growth and Bio Assays with Tobacco Tissue Cultures. Physio. Plant. 1962, 15(3), 473–497. [CrossRef]
- Perveen, S.; Anis, M.; Aref, I. M. In vitro morphogenic response and metal accumulation in Albizia lebbeck (L.) cultures grown under metal stress. Euro. J. Forest Res. 2012, 131(3), 669–681. [CrossRef]
- Malacas, M.; Balberan, M. C.; Amal, N.; Bederi, J.; Ramos, C. J.; Rato, M.; Salazar, G.; Roque, E. The removal of copper (II) and lead (II) from aqueous solution using Fuller’s earth and Fuller’s earth-immobilized nanoscale zero valent iron (FE-NZVI ) by adsorption. MATEC Web Con. 2019, 268, 05006. [CrossRef]
- United States Environmental Protection Agency. Method 3050B: Acid Digestion of Sediments, Sludges, and Soils, 1996, (Issue Revision 2). https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-06/documents/epa-3050b.pdf.
- United States Environmental Protection Agency. Human health risk assessment protocol for hazardous waste combustion facilities. 2005, EPA530-R-05-006. https://epa- prgs.ornl.gov/radionuclides/2005_HHRAP.pdf.
- Yruela, I. Copper in plants: Acquisition, transport and interactions. Func. Plant Bio. 2009, 36(5), 409–430. [CrossRef]
- Usman, K.; Al Ghouti, M. A.; Abu Dieyeh, M. H. The assessment of cadmium, chromium, copper, and nickel tolerance and bioaccumulation by shrub plant Tetraena qataranse. Sci. Reports 2019, 9(1). [CrossRef]
- De Marco, R.; Da Silva, R. F.; Andreazza, R.; Da Ros, C. O.; Scheid, D. L.; Bertollo, G. M. Copper Phytoaccumulation and Tolerance by Seedlings of Native Brazilian Trees. Environ. Engin. Sci. 2016, 33(3), 176–184. [CrossRef]
- Tamta, S.; Kumar, A.; Kumar, R.; Shankhdhar, D. Influence of zinc and copper on morphological characters for improving herbage yield of vegetatively propagated Bacopa monnieri (L.). Pharma. Inno. J. 2021, 10(11). http://www.thepharmajournal.com.
- Javed, S. B.; Alatar, A. A.; Basahi, R.; Anis, M.; Faisal, M.; Husain, F. M. Copper induced suppression of systemic microbial contamination in Erythrina variegata L. during in vitro culture. Plant Cell Tiss. Organ. Cult. 2017, 128, 249–258. [CrossRef]
- Sarkar, T.; Vijay Anand, K. G.; Reddy, M. P. Effect of nickel on regeneration in Jatropha curcas L. and assessment of genotoxicity using RAPD markers. BioMetals 2010, 23(6), 1149–1158. [CrossRef]



| Orchard | Variety | Cu fungicide spray rates | Root stock | Year planted | Tree spacing | Row spacing | Locations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D | Fuji | 1.8 kg ha yr-1 | MM793 | 2010 | 2.50 | 4.50 | 39°38'09.0"S 176°43'48.8"E |
| M | Cripps Pink | 1.8 kg ha yr-1 | MM106 | 1992 | 2.45 | 5.00 | 39°36'38.8"S 176°48'18.6"E |
| W | Braeburn | 1.8 kg ha yr-1 | MM106 | 1990 | 2.50 | 5.00 | 39°35'15.9"S 176°52'35.2"E |
| Orchard | D | M | W | Plant Range† |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variety | Fuji | Cripps Pink | Braeburn | |
| Determinant | ||||
| Nitrogen (%)§ | 3.1 ± 0.25a | 2.7 ± 0.22a | 2.9 ± 0.05a | 2.1 – 3.8 |
| Phosphorus (%)§ | 0.36 ± 0.02a | 0.30 ± 0.01a | 0.31 ± 0.02a | 0.18 – 0.5 |
| Potassium (%)§ | 2.4 ± 0.30a | 2.2 ± 0.20a | 2.1 ± 0.03a | 1.7 – 2.7 |
| Sulfur (%)§ | 0.40 ± 0.03a | 0.39 ± 0.03a | 0.33 ± 0.02a | 0.25 – 0.45 |
| Calcium (%)§ | 1.1 ± 0.05a | 1.1 ± 0.04a | 1.0 ± 0.05a | 1 – 1.8 |
| Magnesium (%)§ | 0.25 ± 0.01a | 0.23 ± 0.01a | 0.22 ± 0.01a | 0.2 – 0.3 |
| Sodium (%)§ | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | - |
| Manganese (mg kg-1) § | 40 ± 0.80a | 34 ± 1.1a | 35 ± 3.5a | 34 – 72 |
| Copper (mg kg-1) *** | 8.0 ± 0.44b | 14 ± 1.0a | 9.0 ± 0.35b | 7 - 20 |
| Boron (mg kg-1) § | 27 ± 0.42a | 28 ± 0.56a | 29 ± 0.31a | 23 – 33 |
| Zinc (mg kg-1) § | 29 ± 0.82a | 25 ± 0.98a | 26 ± 0.24a | 10 – 40 |
| Iron (mg kg-1) § | 44 ± 0.73a | 45 ± 0.97a | 46 ± 0.37a | 40 - 90 |
| Orchard | D | M | W |
|---|---|---|---|
| Variety | Fuji | Cripps Pink | Braeburn |
| Determinant | |||
| pH1:2§[1] | 7.2 ± 0.15a‡ | 7.0 ± 0.09a | 7.1 ± 0.08a |
| Total Cu (mg kg-1)***[2] | 34 ± 1.6b | 126 ± 1.6a | 45 ± 2.8ab |
| Olsen P (mg L-1) **[3] | 35 ± 1.5b | 43 ± 2.1a | 23 ± 1.6c |
| K (me 100g-1) **[4] | 1.0 ± 0.09b | 1.5 ± 0.04a | 0.53 ± 0.09c |
| Ca (me 100g-1) **[4] | 23 ± 0.40a | 21 ± 0.79a | 14 ± 0.44b |
| Mg (me 100g-1) **[4] | 2.8 ± 0.05a | 2.5 ± 0.08a | 1.2 ± 0.14b |
| Na (me 100g-1) **[4] | 0.40 ± 0.03a | 0.13 ± 0.03b | 0.08 ± 0.01b |
| CEC (me 100g-1) **[5] | 295 ± 1.6a | 27 ± 3.4a | 17 ± 2.0b |
| Total Base Saturation (%)§ | 96 ± 3.4a | 94 ± 5.7a | 100 ± 2.6a |
| Available Nitrogen (kg ha-1) **[6] | 87 ± 3.3c | 122 ± 2.5a | 103 ± 9.3b |
| Anaerobically Mineralisable N (g g-1) **[7] | 82 ± 2.7ab | 93 ± 5.6a | 74 ± 1.6b |
| Organic Matter (%)***[8] | 11 ± 0.83a | 5.6 ± 0.40b | 5.5 ± 0.20b |
| Total C (%)***[8] | 6.6 ± 0.03a | 3.3 ± 0.04b | 3.1 ± 0.04b |
| Total N (%)**[6] | 0.61 ± 0.04a | 0.32 ± 0.03b | 0.25 ± 0.02b |
| C/N Ratio§ | 11 ± 0.49ab | 10 ± 0.39ab | 12 ± 0.32a |
| Anaerobically Mineralisable N / Total N ratio** | 1.4 ± 0.06b | 2.9 ± 0.17a | 3.0 ± 0.10a |
| Volume Weight (g mL-1) **[9] | 0.73 ± 0.02b | 0.87 ± 0.02ab | 0.91 ± 0.01a |
| Soil texture§ | Loamy | Loamy | Loamy |
| Original dataset | > 10 mg Cu kg-1 excluded dataset | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variety SS | Media Cu SS | Variety F | Media Cu F | Variety SS | Media Cu SS | Variety F | Media Cu F | |
| Callus Cu Con. | 530839 | 10722184 | 120 | 9683 | 456 | 33198 | 65 | 4730 |
| G25 | 58225 | 283710 | 1630 | 3177 | 8783 | 2071 | 230 | 54 |
| G40 | 11475 | 78359 | 427 | 1168 | 30073 | 2792 | 983 | 91 |
| Gtotal | 18042 | 617339 | 271 | 3712 | 6393 | 312 | 97 | 5 |
| FW | 2.9 | 35 | 94 | 450 | 2.5 | 2.1 | 57 | 49 |
| DW | 0.002 | 0.013 | 33 | 80 | 0.006 | 0.002 | 103 | 34 |
| TI | 17847 | 5618 | 619 | 78 | 5443 | 1219 | 222 | 50 |
| BCF | 1981 | 249012 | 110 | 5525 | 343 | 39429 | 67 | 7747 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).