Submitted:
18 September 2024
Posted:
20 September 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract

Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Results
2.1. Bioclimatic Analyses
Phenology and Defoliation Analyses
3. Discussion
4. Materials and Methods
Study Site
Climate of Seed Orgin and Study Area
| Group of climatic zone | Provenance name | Individual N° of Plus trees | Numbers of grafts in plot 2 of seed orchard | Ramets survival, year 2020 [%] | Selected for statistical analysis | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | south | Browsk | 3362 | 7 | 87.5 | + |
| 2 | Browsk | 3367 | 13 | 73.3 | + | |
| 3 | Białowieża | 3385 | 3 | 50.0 | - | |
| 4 | Hajnówka | 3418 | 13 | 85.71 | + | |
| 5 | Hajnówka | 5389 | 11 | 57.14 | + | |
| 6 | Hajnówka | 5390 | 13 | 75.0 | + | |
| 7 | Hajnówka | 5517 | 11 | 84.62 | + | |
| 8 | Hajnówka | 5523 | 7 | 43.75 | + | |
| 9 | Hajnówka | 5524 | 2 | 33.33 | - | |
| 10 | Hajnówka | 5525 | 13 | 75 | + | |
| 11 | Białowieża | 5542 | 7 | 58.33 | + | |
| 12 | Hajnówka | 5721 | 9 | 69.23 | + | |
| 13 | Hajnówka | 5722 | 11 | 78.57 | + | |
| 14 | Hajnówka | 5723 | 8 | 72.73 | + | |
| 15 | Hajnówka | 5726 | 10 | 64.29 | + | |
| 16 | Browsk | 6309 | 12 | 78.57 | + | |
| 17 | Browsk | 6313 | 7 | 50 | + | |
| 18 | Hajnówka | 6318 | 2 | 100 | - | |
| 19 | north | Borki | 7246 | 3 | 75 | - |
| 20 | Gołdap | 7268 | 3 | 50 | + | |
| 21 | Gołdap | 7280 | 8 | 70 | + | |
| 22 | Borki | 7301 | 10 | 76.92 | + | |
| 23 | Czerwony Dwór | 7312 | 9 | 72.73 | + | |
| 24 | Czerwony Dwór | 7313 | 8 | 60 | + | |
| 25 | Czerwony Dwór | 7875 | 4 | 75 | - | |
| 26 | Gołdap | 7882 | 3 | 16.67 | + | |
| 27 | Gołdap | 7887 | 11 | 76.92 | + | |
| 28 | Gołdap | 7888 | 4 | 66.67 | + | |
| 29 | Gołdap | 7916 | 6 | 100 | + | |
| 30 | Gołdap | 7918 | 3 | 37.5 | + | |
| 31 | Gołdap | 7919 | 7 | 77.78 | + |

Phyto-Pathological Evaluation

Phenological Observations and Health Condition
- dormant bud
- swelling of bud, slight greening of bud scales
- buds begin to burst, first green visible
- bud burst, petioles of leaves visible, no lengthening of twig
- bud burst, petioles of leaves visible, twig has started lengthening, leaves are fully expanded.
Bioclimatic Analysis
Statistical Analyses
- represents the mean bud burst stage for clone i in year j;
- is the intercept, reflecting the estimated mean bud burst stage in 2018;
- and are the fixed effect coefficients for the years 2019 and 2020, respectively;
- is the random effect associated with clone i, representing the deviation of each clone from the overall mean, assumed to follow a normal distribution with mean 0 and variance ;
- is the residual error term, normally distributed with mean 0 and variance .
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Dobrowolska, D.; Hein, S.; Oosterbaan, A.; Wagner, S.; Clark, J.; Skovsgaard, J.P. A review of European ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.): Implications for silviculture. Forestry 84, (2011):133–148. [CrossRef]
- Hemery, G.E. Forest management and silvicultural responses to projected climate change impacts on European broadleaved trees and forests. Int For Rev 10, (2008):591–607. [CrossRef]
- Rawlik, K.; Jagodzinski, A.M. Ekologiczne znaczenie roslin runa lesnego. ACADEMIA-mag Pol. Akademii Nauk 3-4: (2019), 50–53.
- Dyderski, M.K.; Paź, S.; Frelich, L.E.; Jagodziński, A.M. How much does climate change threaten European forest tree species distributions? Global Change Biology, 24, (2018): 1150−1163. DOI: DOI: . [CrossRef]
- Bakys, R.; Vasaitis, R.; Barklund, P.; Ihrmark, K.; Stenlid, J. Investigations concerning the role of Chalara fraxinea in declining fraxinus excelsior. Plant Pathol 58, (2009):284–292. [CrossRef]
- Gross, A.; Holdenrieder, O.; Pautasso, M.; Queloz, V.; Sieber, T.N. Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus,; the causal agent of European ash dieback. Mol plant pathol 15, (2014):5–21. [CrossRef]
- Kowalski, T.; Holdenrieder, O. Pathogenicity of Chalara fraxinea. For Pathol 39, (2009):1–7.
- McKinney, L.V.; Nielsen, L.R.; Hansen, J.K.; Kjær, E.D. Presence of natural genetic resistance in fraxinus excelsior (Oleraceae) to Chalara fraxinea (Ascomycota): An emerging infectious disease. Heredity (Edinb) 106, (2011):788–797. [CrossRef]
- Kowalski, T.; Bartnik, C. Morphologial variation in colonies of Chalara fraxinea isolated from ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) stems with symptoms of dieback and effects of temperature on colony growth and structure. Acta Agrobot 63. (2010) . [CrossRef]
- Pautasso, M.; Aas, G.; Queloz, V.; Holdenrieder, O. European ash (Fraxinus excelsior) dieback–A conservation biology challenge. Biol Conserv 158: (2013), 37–49.
- Coker, T.L.; Rozsypalek, J.; Edwards, A.; Harwood, T.P.; Butfoy, L.; Buggs, R.J. Estimating mortality rates of European ash (Fraxinus excelsior) under the ash dieback (Hymenoscyphus fraxineus) epidemic. Plants, People, Planet 1, (2019):48–58. [CrossRef]
- Musolin, D.L.; Selikhovkin, A.V.; Shabunin, D.A.; Zviagintsev, V.B.; Baranchikov, Y.N. Between ash dieback and emerald ash borer: Two Asian invaders in Russia and the future of ash in Europe. Baltic For 23: (2017), 316–333.
- Turczański, K.; Rutkowski, P.; Dyderski, M.K.; Wronska-Pilarek, D.; Nowiński, M. Soil pH and organic matter content affects European ash (Fraxinus excelsior l.) crown defoliation and its impact on understory vegetation. Forests 11: (2020).
- Davydenko, K.; Meshkova, V. The current situation concerning severity and causes of ash dieback in Ukraine caused by Hymenoscyphus fraxineus, (2017).
- Grosdidier, M.; Scordia, T.; Ioos, R.; Marçais, B. Landscape epidemiology of ash dieback. J Ecol 108:1789–1799. (2020) . [CrossRef]
- Wylder, B.; Biddle, M.; King, K.; Baden, R.; Webber, J. Evidence from mortality dating of Fraxinus excelsior indicates ash dieback (Hymenoscyphus fraxineus) was active in England in 2004 – 2005. (2018). Forestry. [CrossRef]
- Przybylski, P.; Sikora, K.; Mohytych, V.; Wlostowski, M. Wpływ zabiegu agrotechnicznego na stan zdrowotny klonalnej plantacji nasiennej jesionu wyniosłego (Fraxinus excelsior L.) w kontekście jej porażenia przez Hymenoscyphus fraxineus (T. Kowalski). sylwan 164: (2020) 404–413.
- Anderson, J.T.; Inouye, D.W.; McKinney, A.M.; Colautti, R.I.; Mitchell-Olds, T. Phenotypic plasticity and adaptive evolution contribute to advancing flowering phenology in response to climate change. Proc Biol Sci 279, (2012):3843–3852. [CrossRef]
- Smintina, I. Provenance trials of fraxinus excelsior. Results 10 years after planting. Revista Padurilor 108: (1993), 10–17.
- Kleinschmit, J.; Svolba, .J; Enescu, V.; Franke, A.; Rau, H.; Ruetz, W. First results of provenance trials of fraxinus excelsior established in 1982. Forstarchiv 67, (1996):114–122.
- Bakys, R.; Vasaitis, R.; Skovsgaard, J.P. Patterns and severity of crown dieback in young even-aged stands of european ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) in relation to stand density; bud flushing phenotype; and season. Plant Protect Sci 49, (2013):120–126. [CrossRef]
- Hill, L.; Jones, G.; Atkinson, N.; Hector, A.; Hemery, G.; Brown, N. The £15 billion cost of ash dieback in Britain. Curr Biol. 2019 May 6;29(9):R315-R316. [CrossRef]
- Queloz, V.; Grünig, C.R.; Berndt, R.; Kowalski, T.; Sieber, T.N.; Holdenrieder, O. Cryptic speciation in Hymenoscyphus albidus. For Pathol 41: (2010), 133–142. [CrossRef]
- Drenkhan, R.; Riit, T.; Adamson, K.; Hanso, M. The earliest samples of Hymenoscyphus albidus vs. H. fraxineus in Estonian mycological herbaria. (2016).
- Meger, J.; Ulaszewski, B.; Pałucka, M.; Kozioł, C.; Burczyk, J. . Genomic prediction of resistance to Hymenoscyphus fraxineus in common ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) populations. Evolutionary Applications, 17, (2024). [CrossRef]
- Burokiene, D.; Prospero, S.; Jung, E.; Marciulyniene, D.; Moosbrugger, K.; Norkute, G.; Rigling, D.; Lygis, V.; Schoebel, C.N. Genetic population structure of the invasive ash dieback pathogen Hymenoscyphus fraxineus in its expanding range. Biol Invasions 17, (2015):2743–2756. [CrossRef]
- Zhao, Y.J.; Hosoya, T.; Baral, H.O.; Hosaka, K.; Kakishima, M. Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus; the correct name for Lambertella albida reported from Japan. Mycotaxon -Ithaca Ny- 122: (2012). 25–41. [CrossRef]
- Kirisits, T.; Matlakova, M.; Mottinger-Kroupa, S.; Halmschlager, E.; Lakatos, F. Chalara fraxinea associated with dieback of narrow-leafed ash (Fraxinus angustifolia). Plant Pathol 59, (2010):411. [CrossRef]
- Baliuckas, V., Pliura, A. Development of dynamic multiple population breeding and conservation system of Quercus robur L. Proc Nordic Baltic Situ Symp.8, (1998):14.
- Stener, L.G. Clonal differences in susceptibility to the dieback of fraxinus excelsior in southern Sweden. Scand J For Res 28: (2013), 205–216. [CrossRef]
- Pliura, A.; Baliuckas, V. Genetic variation in adaptive traits of progenies of Lithuanian and western European populations of fraxinus excelsior L. Baltic For 13: (2007), 28–38.
- Timmermann, V.; Borja, I.; Hietala, A.M.; Kirisits, T.; Solheim, H. Ash dieback: Pathogen spread and diurnal patterns of ascospore dispersal; with special emphasis on Norway. EPPO Bull 41: (2011), 14–20. [CrossRef]
- Kirisits, T., Cech, T.L. Beobachtungen zum sexuellen stadium des eschentriebsterben-erregers Chalara fraxinea in osterreich. Forstsch Aktuell 48, (2009):21–25.
- Chandelier, A.; Andre, F.; Laurent, F. Detection of Chalara fraxinea in common ash (fraxinus excelsior) using real time PCR. Forest Pathol 40, (2009):87–95. [CrossRef]
- Lorenz. M. International co-operative programme on assessment and monitoring of air pollution effects on forests-ICP forests. Water, Air, Soil Pollut 85, (1995):1221–1226.
- Starzycka, J. Geographic information system in the state forests. In: Gajos M, Styblinska M (ed) Geoinformation challenges, Croatian Information Technology Association, (2008), Silesia, pp 259–267.
- Fick, S.E.; Hijmans, R.J. WorldClim 2: New 1-km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol 37:4302–4315. (2017) . [CrossRef]
- Kaufman, L.; Rousseeuw P.J. Finding groups in data: An introduction to cluster analysis. John Wiley & Sons INC., Hoboken, New Jersey. (2008).
- Bates, D.; Mächler, M.; Bolker, B. & Walker, S.. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. (2015).







| Bioclimatic variables | Abbreviation | Pearson’s correlation | |
|---|---|---|---|
| PC1 | PC2 | ||
| Temperature Seasonality (STD * 100) | bio4 | -0.42 | -0.6 |
| Mean Temperature of Wettest Quarter | bio8 | 0.73 | -0.6 |
| Mean Temperature of Driest Quarter | bio9 | 0.53 | -0.33 |
| Mean Temperature of Warmest Quarter | bio10 | 0.73 | -0.62 |
| Mean Temperature of Coldest Quarter | bio11 | 0.87 | 0.09 |
| Precipitation Seasonality (CV) | bio15 | 0.17 | 0.82 |
| Precipitation of Driest Quarter | bio17 | -0.84 | -0.28 |
| Precipitation of Coldest Quarter | bio19 | -0.77 | -0.48 |
| MeanFenKlon | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Predictors | Estimates | CI | p |
| year [2018] (Intercept) | 3.27 | 3.01 – 3.54 | <0.001 |
| year [2019] | -0.16 | -0.40 – 0.08 | 0.196 |
| year [2020] | -0.37 | -0.61 – -0.13 | 0.003 |
| Random Effects | |||
| σ2 | 0.16 | ||
| τ00 Klon | 0.22 | ||
| ICC | 0.57 | ||
| N Klon | 22 | ||
| Observations | 66 | ||
| Marginal R2 / Conditional R2 | 0.058 / 0.596 | ||
| Jan. | Feb. | March | Apr. | May | June | July | Aug. | Spt. | Oct. | Nov. | Dec. | Mean | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Temp. 2018 | -1.2 | -4.2 | -0.6 | 12.4 | 18.1 | 19.2 | 21.2 | 20.7 | 16.0 | 9.6 | 3.4 | 0.1 | 9.6 |
| Temp. 2019 | -3.4 | 1.9 | 4.7 | 9.9 | 13.5 | 22.3 | 19.0 | 20.1 | 14.3 | 10.6 | 5.3 | 2.4 | 10.1 |
| Temp. 2020 | 1.8 | 2.5 | 4.0 | 8.2 | 11.3 | 19.5 | 19.0 | 20.2 | 15.5 | 10.3 | 4.9 | 0.0 | 9.8 |
| Air humidity 2018 | 90.8 | 85.4 | 73.5 | 65.6 | 57.2 | 58.1 | 69.4 | 66.8 | 69.7 | 77.5 | 90.2 | 95.0 | 74.9 |
| Air humidity 2019 | 92.8 | 83.4 | 75.1 | 51.4 | 69.9 | 61.0 | 64.8 | 64.9 | 71.3 | 82.4 | 90.1 | 90.3 | 74.8 |
| Air humidity 2020 | 92.2 | 83.6 | 68.5 | 55.3 | 69.2 | 71.4 | 67.1 | 67.3 | 76.0 | 87.8 | 93.4 | 95.5 | 77.3 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).