Submitted:
06 September 2024
Posted:
09 September 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
- ▪
- to define the presence of imbalance in children with diagnosis of CMI;
- ▪
- to explore the etiologic mechanisms underlying imbalance in these patients;
- ▪
- to determine a correlation between imbalance and surgery; to explore the usefulness of ENT examination and the use of CDP in the surgical management of CMI children.
2. Patients and Methods
2.1. Patients
- ▪
- 8 patients were excluded from the study because they did not meet the inclusion criteria,
- ▪
- 2 patients were less than 6 years of age,
- ▪
- 1 patient had severe visual impairment,
- ▪
- 2 patients had cognitive impairment,
- ▪
- 2 patients were operated for craniocervical decompression for cerebellar ptosis secondary to craniostenosis,
- ▪
- 1 patient had already been operated on in the past for Chiari I malformation
- ▪
- 5 patients refused to be enrolled
2.2. Methods
2.3. Statistics
3. Results
| Variable | Total population (n=28/27) | Group 1 (n=18/17) | Group 2 (before operation) (n=10) | P value |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neurological | Normal | 16/28 (57 %) | 13/18 (72 %) | 3/10 (30 %) | 0.049 |
| Coordination disorders | 2/28 (7 %) | 0/18 (0 %) | 2/10 (20 %) | 0.12 | |
| Balance disorders (ataxia) | 4/28 (14 %) | 2/18 (11 %) | 2/10 (20 %) | 0.60 | |
| OTR anomalies | 6/28 (21 %) | 4/18 (22 %) | 2/10 (20 %) | 1.00 | |
| Sensitive disorders | 4/28 (14 %) | 0/18 (0 %) | 4/10 (40 %) | 0.010 | |
| Oculomotor trouble | 1/28 (4 %) | 0/18 (0 %) | 1/10 (10 %) | 0.36 | |
| ENT | Normal | 12/27 (44 %) | 10/18 (56 %) | 2/9 (22 %) | 0.22 |
| Vestibular deficit | 1/27 (4 %) | 1/18 (6 %) | 0/9 (0 %) | 1.00 | |
| Nystagmus | 1/27 (4 %) | 0/18 (0 %) | 1/9 (11 %) | 0.33 | |
| Saccadic eye mouvements | 7/27 (26 %) | 3/18 (17 %) | 4/9 (44 %) | 0.18 | |
| Dizziness | 4/27 (15 %) | 1/18 (6 %) | 3/9 (33 %) | 0.093 | |
| Hearing loss | 7/27 (26 %) | 4/18 (22 %) | 3/9 (33 %) | 0.65 | |
| Tinnitus | 3/27 (11 %) | 1/18 (6 %) | 2/9 (22 %) | 0.25 |
4. Discussion
5. Conclusion
Ethics and dissemination
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Rydell, R.E.; Pulec, J.L. Arnold-Chiari Malformation: Neuro-otologic Symptoms. Arch. Otolaryngol. Neck Surg. 1971, 94, 8–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Saez, R.J.; Onofrio, B.M.; Yanagihara, T. Experience with Arnold-Chiari malformation, 1960 to 1970. J. Neurosurg. 1976, 45, 416–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- C. Raybaud and G. I. Jallo, ‘Chiari 1 deformity in children: etiopathogenesis and radiologic diagnosis’, Handb. Clin. Neurol., vol. 155, pp. 25–48, 2018. [CrossRef]
- Chatrath, A.; Marino, A.; Taylor, D.; Elsarrag, M.; Soldozy, S.; Jane, J.A. Chiari I malformation in children—the natural history. Child's Nerv. Syst. 2019, 35, 1793–1799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Meadows, J.; Kraut, M.; Guarnieri, M.; Haroun, R.I.; Carson, B.S. Asymptomatic Chiari Type I malformations identified on magnetic resonance imaging. J. Neurosurg. 2000, 92, 920–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ciaramitaro, P.; Ferraris, M.; Massaro, F.; Garbossa, D. Clinical diagnosis—part I: what is really caused by Chiari I. Child's Nerv. Syst. 2019, 35, 1673–1679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Steinbok, P. Clinical features of Chiari I malformations. Child's Nerv. Syst. 2004, 20, 329–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Piper, R.J.; Pike, M.; Harrington, R.; A Magdum, S. Chiari malformations: principles of diagnosis and management. BMJ 2019, 365, l1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmmed, A.U.; Mackenzie, I.; Das, V.K.; Chatterjee, S.; Lye, R.H. Audio-vestibular manifestations of Chiari malformation and outcome of surgical decompression: A case report. J. Laryngol. Otol. 1996, 110, 1060–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Awami, A.; Flanders, M.E.; Andermann, F.; Polomeno, R.C. Resolution of periodic alternating nystagmus after decompression for Chiari malformation. Can. J. Ophthalmol. 2005, 40, 778–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Albers, F.W.J.; Ingels, K.J.A.O. Otoneurological manifestations in Chiari-I malformation. J. Laryngol. Otol. 1993, 107, 441–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baloh, R.W.; Spooner, J.W. Downbeat nystagmus: A type of central vestibular nystagmus. Neurology 1981, 31, 304–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bronstein, A.; Miller, D.; Rudge, P.; Kendall, B. Down beating nystagmus: Magnetic resonance imaging and neuro-otological findings. J. Neurol. Sci. 1987, 81, 173–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gresty, M.; Barratt, H.; Rudge, P.; Page, N. Analysis of Downbeat Nystagmus. Arch. Neurol. 1986, 43, 52–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiménez, G.G.; Gutiérrez, M.; de Lucas, E.M.; Román, N.V.S.; Laez, R.M.; Angulo, C.M. Manifestaciones audiovestibulares en la malformación de Chiari tipo i. Serie de casos y revisión bibliográfica. Acta Otorrinolaringol. espanola 2015, 66, 28–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Korres, S.; Balatsouras, D.G.; Zournas, C.; Economou, C.; Gatsonis, S.D.; Adamopoulos, G. Periodic alternating nystagmus associated with Arnold-Chiari malformation. J. Laryngol. Otol. 2001, 115, 1001–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Longridge, N.S.; Mallinson, A.I. Arnold-chiari malformation and the otolaryngologist: Place of magnetic resonance imaging and electronystagmography. Laryngoscope 1985, 95, 335–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mossman, S.S.; Bronstein, A.M.; Gresty, M.A.; Kendall, B.; Rudge, P. Convergence Nystagmus Associated With Arnold-Chiari Malformation. Arch. Neurol. 1990, 47, 357–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pieh, C.; Gottlob, I. Arnold-Chiari malformation and nystagmus of skew. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2000, 69, 124–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sperling, N.M.; Franco, R.A.; Milhorat, T.H. Otologic Manifestations of Chiari I Malformation. Otol. Neurotol. 2001, 22, 678–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spooner, J.W.; Baloh, R.W. ‘Arnold-Chiari malformation: improvement in eye movements after surgical treatment. Brain 1981, 104, 51–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zimmerman, C.F.; Roach, E.S.; Troost, B.T. See-saw Nystagmus Associated With Chiari Malformation. Arch. Neurol. 1986, 43, 299–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Muncie, H.L.; Sirmans, S.M.; James, E. Dizziness: Approach to Evaluation and Management. Am. Fam. Physician 2017, 95, 154–162. [Google Scholar]
- E Post, R.; Dickerson, L.M. Dizziness: a diagnostic approach. Am. Fam. Physician 2010, 82, 361–369. [Google Scholar]
- P.P. Perrin, D. Vibert, C. Van Nechel in E. Masson, ‘Étiologie des vertiges’, EM-Consulte. Accessed: May 16, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.em-consulte.com/article/660116/etiologie-des-vertiges.
- Ashizawa, T.; Xia, G. Ataxia. Contin. Lifelong Learn. Neurol. 2016, 22, 1208–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kingma, H.; Gauchard, G.C.; de Waele, C.; van Nechel, C.; Bisdorff, A.; Yelnik, A.; Magnusson, M.; Perrin, P.P. Stocktaking on the development of posturography for clinical use. J. Vestib. Res. 2011, 21, 117–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Stella, I.; Remen, T.; Petel, A.; Joud, A.; Klein, O.; Perrin, P. Postural control in Chiari I malformation: protocol for a paediatric prospective, observational cohort – potential role of posturography for surgical indication. BMJ Open 2022, 12, e056647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Famili, H.P.; Zalewski, C.K.; Ibrahimy, A.; Mack, J.; Cantor, F.; Heiss, J.D.; Brewer, C.C. Audiovestibular Findings in a Cohort of Patients with Chiari Malformation Type I and Dizziness. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 2767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palamar, D. Posturographic examination of body balance in patients with Chiari type I malformation and correlation with the presence of syringomyelia and degree of cerebellar ectopia. Turk. J. Phys. Med. Rehabilitation 2019, 65, 74–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- G. P. Jacobson, C. W. Newman, and J. M. Kartush, Handbook of Balance Function Testing. Mosby Year Book, 1993.
- Lion, A.; Bosser, G.; Gauchard, G.C.; Djaballah, K.; Mallié, J.-P.; Perrin, P.P. Exercise and dehydration: A possible role of inner ear in balance control disorder. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 2010, 20, 1196–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- P. P. Perrin, ‘Équilibration, proprioception et sport’, Elsevier-Masson, 2013. Accessed: May 16, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://hal.univ-lorraine.fr/hal-01957765.
- Baloh, R.W.; Jacobson, K.M.; Beykirch, K.; Honrubia, V. Static and Dynamic Posturography in Patients With Vestibular and Cerebellar Lesions. Arch. Neurol. 1998, 55, 649–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maki, B.E.; Holliday, P.J.; Topper, A.K. A Prospective Study of Postural Balance and Risk of Falling in An Ambulatory and Independent Elderly Population. J. Gerontol. 1994, 49, M72–M84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mauritz, K.H.; Dichgans, J.; Hufschmidt, A. Quantitative analysis of stance in late cortical cerebellar atrophy of the anterior lobe and other forms of cerebellar ataxia. Brain 1979, 102, 461–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mirka, A.; Black, F.O. Clinical Application of Dynamic Posturography for Evaluating Sensory Integration and Vestibular Dysfunction. Neurol. Clin. 1990, 8, 351–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nashner, L.M.; McCollum, G. The organization of human postural movements: A formal basis and experimental synthesis. Behav. Brain Sci. 1985, 8, 135–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gagnon, B.I, Swaine, and R. Forget, ‘Exploring the comparability of the Sensory Organization Test and the Pediatric Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction for Balance in children’, Phys. Occup. Ther. Pediatr., vol. 26, no. 1–2, pp. 23–41, 2006.
- Ferber-Viart, C.; Ionescu, E.; Morlet, T.; Froehlich, P.; Dubreuil, C. Balance in healthy individuals assessed with Equitest: Maturation and normative data for children and young adults. Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 2007, 71, 1041–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Redline, S.; Tishler, P.V.; Schluchter, M.; Aylor, J.; Clark, K.; Graham, G. Risk Factors for Sleep-disordered Breathing in Children. Associations with obesity, race, and respiratory problem. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 1999, 159, 1527–1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Moncho, D.; A Poca, M.; Minoves, T.; Ferré, A.; Rahnama, K.; Sahuquillo, J. [Brainstem auditory evoked potentials and somatosensory evoked potentials in Chiari malformation]. Rev. Neurol. 2013, 56, 623–34. [Google Scholar]
- Alexander, H.; Tsering, D.; Myseros, J.S.; Magge, S.N.; Oluigbo, C.; Sanchez, C.E.; Keating, R.F. Management of Chiari I malformations: a paradigm in evolution. Child's Nerv. Syst. 2019, 35, 1809–1826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Novegno, F. Clinical diagnosis—part II: what is attributed to Chiari I. Child's Nerv. Syst. 2019, 35, 1681–1693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goldschagg, N.; Feil, K.; Ihl, F.; Krafczyk, S.; Kunz, M.; Tonn, J.C.; Strupp, M.; Peraud, A. Decompression in Chiari Malformation: Clinical, Ocular Motor, Cerebellar, and Vestibular Outcome. Front. Neurol. 2017, 8, 292–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johnson, G.D.; E Harbaugh, R.; Lenz, S.B. Surgical decompression of Chiari I malformation for isolated progressive sensorineural hearing loss. Am. J. Otol. 1994, 15, 634–8. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Moncho, D.; Poca, M.A.; Minoves, T.; Ferré, A.; Cañas, V.; Sahuquillo, J. Are evoked potentials clinically useful in the study of patients with Chiari malformation Type 1? J. Neurosurg. 2017, 126, 606–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hirabayashi, S.-I.; Iwasaki, Y. Developmental perspective of sensory organization on postural control. Brain Dev. 1995, 17, 111–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Matheson, A.J.; Darlington, C.L.; Smith, P.F. Further evidence for age-related deficits in human postural function. J. Vestib. Res. 1999, 9, 261–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Domínguez, M.O.; Magro, J.B.; González, J.D.; González, G.D.; Gaona, J.R.; Pastor, J.B. Control postural según la edad en pacientes con vértigo posicional paroxístico benigno. Acta Otorrinolaringol. espanola 2005, 56, 354–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sinno, S.; Dumas, G.; Mallinson, A.; Najem, F.; Abouchacra, K.S.; Nashner, L.; Perrin, P. Changes in the Sensory Weighting Strategies in Balance Control Throughout Maturation in Children. J. Am. Acad. Audiol. 2020, 32, 122–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pierchała, K.; Lachowska, M.; Morawski, K.; Niemczyk, K. [Sensory Organization Test outcomes in young, older and elderly healthy individuals--preliminary results]. Otolaryngol. Polska 2012, 66, 274–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Faraldo-García, A.; Santos-Pérez, S.; Labella-Caballero, T.; Soto-Varela, A. Influence of Gender on the Sensory Organisation Test and the Limits of Stability in Healthy Subjects. Acta Otorrinolaringol. (English Ed. 2011, 62, 333–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perrin, P.; Deviterne, D.; Hugel, F.; Perrot, C. Judo, better than dance, develops sensorimotor adaptabilities involved in balance control. Gait Posture 2002, 15, 187–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baydal-Bertomeu, J.; I Guillem, R.B.; Soler-Gracia, C.; De Moya, M.P.; Prat, J.; De Guzmán, R.B. Determinación de los patrones de comportamiento postural en población sana española. Acta Otorrinolaringol. espanola 2004, 55, 260–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- J. Rama-López and N. Perez-Fernandez, ‘Sensory interaction in posturograhy’, Acta Otorrinolaringológica Esp., vol. 55, pp. 62–6, Mar. 2004.




| Postural control test | ||
|---|---|---|
| Name | Situation | Sensory consequences |
| Condition 1 | Fixed support, eyes open | - |
| Condition 2 | Fixed support, eyes closed | Vision absent |
| Condition 3 | Fixed support, SR surround | Altered vision |
| Condition 4 | SR support, eyes open | Altered proprioception |
| Condition 5 | SR support, eyes closed | Vision absent, altered proprioception |
| Condition 6 | SR support, SR surround | Altered vision and proprioception |
| Name | Equation | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| Composite score | [C1 + C2 + 3 (C3 + C4 + C5 + C6)] / 14 | Evaluate global balance performance. A low score represents poor postural control |
| Somatosensory ratio | C2 / C1 | Ability to use somatosensory input to maintain balance (even when visual cues are removed). A low score suggests poor use of somatosensory references |
| Visual ratio | C4 / C1 | Ability to use visual input to maintain balance (even when somatosensory cues are altered). A low score suggests poor use of visual references |
| Vestibular ratio | C5 / C1 | Ability to use vestibular input system to maintain balance (even when visual cues are removed and somatosensory cues are altered). a low score suggests poor use of vestibular cues or that vestibular information is unavailable |
| Visual preference ratio | C3 + C6 / C2 + C5 | Degree to which patient relies on visual information to maintain balance (correct/incorrect information). A low score suggests reliance on visual cues even when they are inaccurate |
| Variable | Total population (n=28/27) | Group 1 (n=18/17) | Group 2 (before operation) (n=10) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genre male | 18 (64 %) | 13 (72 %) | 5 (50 %) | 0.26 |
| Age | 10.0 (8.0 - 14.0) | 10.0/18 (8.0 - 13.0) | 10.0 (8.0 - 15.0) | 0.90 |
| Normal schoolarship | 22/28 (79 %) | 14 (78 %) | 8/10 (80 %) | 1.00 |
| Chronic non neurologic illness | 6/28 (21 %) | 5 (28 %) | 1/10 (10 %) | 0.37 |
| Non chronic, non neurologic anterior medical history | 4/27 (15 %) | 1/17 (6 %) | 3/10 (30 %) | 0.13 |
| Non chronic, non neurologic anterior surgery | 6/27 (22 %) | 3/17 (18 %) | 3/10 (30 %) | 0.64 |
| Genetic pathology | 2/27 (7 %) | 1/17 (6 %) | 1/10 (10 %) | 1.00 |
| Neurologic pathology | 1/27 (4 %) | 1/17 (6 %) | 0/10 (0 %) | 1.00 |
| ENT non vestibular pathology | 1 (4 %) | 1/17 (6 %) | 0/10 (0 %) | 1.00 |
| Ortopaedic pathology | 1 (4 %) | 1/17 (6 %) | 0/10 (0 %) | 1.00 |
| Respiratory pathology | 2 (7 %) | 2/17 (11 %) | 0/10 (0 %) | 0.52 |
| Strabismus | 5 (18 %) | 3/17 (17 %) | 2/10 (20 %) | 1.00 |
| Speech difficulties/Speech therapy | 15/27 (56 %) | 8/17 (47 %) | 7/10 (70 %) | 0.42 |
| Glasses | 14/27 (50 %) | 8/17 (44 %) | 6/10 (60 %) | 0.43 |
| Bicycle driving difficulties | 24/28 (89 %) | 18/18 (100 %) | 7/10 (70 %) | 0.041 |
| Presenting symptom | Total population (n=28) | Group 1 (n=18) |
Group 2 (before operation) (n=10) |
P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Headaches | 12 (43 %) | 6 (33 %) | 6 (60 %) | 0.24 |
| Accidental | 7 (25 %) | 4 (22 %) | 3 (30 %) | 0.67 |
| Developmental delay | 2 (7 %) | 2 (11 %) | 0 (0 %) | 0.52 |
| Malaise | 2 (7 %) | 2 (11 %) | 0 (0 %) | 0.52 |
| Nuchal pain | 2 (7 %) | 1 (6 %) | 1 (10 %) | 1.00 |
| Oculomotor deficit | 2 (7 %) | 2 (11 %) | 0 (0 %) | 0.52 |
| Sensory-motor deficit | 1 (4 %) | 1 (6 %) | 0 (0 %) | 1.00 |
| Headaches and vertigo | Total population | Not operated | Operated | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Headaches | Global | 23/28 (82%) | 13/18 (72%) | 10/10 (100%) | 0.128 |
| Occipital headaches | 9/28 (32 %) | 5/18 (28 %) | 4/10 (40 %) | 0.68 | |
| Non occipital headaches | 14/28 (50 %) | 9/18 (6 %) | 6/10 (60 %) | 1.00 | |
| Exertional headaches | 1/28 (4 %) | 1/18 (6 %) | 0/10 (0 %) | 1.00 | |
| Weekly headaches | 17/28 (61 %) | 10/18 (56 %) | 7/10 (70 %) | 0.69 | |
| Monthly headaches | 6/28 (21 %) | 3/18 (17 %) | 3/10 (30 %) | 0.63 | |
| Drugs resolving headaches | 12/27 (44 %) | 6/17 (35 %) | 6/10 (60 %) | 0.26 | |
| Rest and dark resolving headaches | 4/27 (15 %) | 2/17 (12 %) | 2/10 (20 %) | 0.61 | |
| Family migraine | 19/28 (68 %) | 12/18 (67 %) | 7/10 (70 %) | 1.00 | |
| Associated vomiting | 6/27 (22 %) | 3/17 (18 %) | 3/10 (30 %) | 0.64 | |
| Vertigo | Global | 12/28 (43 %) | 6/18 (33 %) | 6/10 (60 %) | 0.24 |
| Weekly vertigo | 6/28 (21 %) | 5/18 (28 %) | 1/10 (10 %) | 0.37 | |
| Monthly vertigo | 6/28 (21 %) | 1/18 (6 %) | 5/10 (50 %) | 0.013 | |
| Positional vertigo | 7/28 (25 %) | 4/18 (22 %) | 3/10 (30 %) | 0.67 | |
| Exertional vertigo | 4/28 (14 %) | 1/18 (6 %) | 3/10 (30 %) | 0.12 | |
| Vision related vertigo | 1/28 (4 %) | 1/18 (6 %) | 0/10 (0 %) | 1.00 | |
| Motion sickness | 7/28 (25 %) | 5/18 (28 %) | 2/10 (20 %) | 1.00 | |
| Group 2 | Before intervention | After intervention | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Headaches | 10/10 (100%) | 7/10 (70%) | p=0.052 |
| Nuchal | 4/10 (40%) | 1/7 (14%) | p=0.527 |
| Non nuchal | 6/10 (60%) | 6/7 (71%) | p=0.059 |
| Vertigo | 6/10 (60%) | 2/10 (20%) | P=0.593 |
| Positional | 3/10 (30%) | 0/2 | p=0.655 |
| Exertional | 3/10 (30%) | 1/2 (50%) | p=0.317 |
| Brutal | 0/10 | 1/2 (50%) | p=0.317 |
| Variable | Total population (n=28/27) | Group 1 (n=18/17) | Group 2 (before operation) (n=10) | P value |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | Tonsillar ptosis >1 cm | 12/28 (43 %) | 5/18 (28 %) | 7/10 (70 %) | 0.049 |
| Syringomyelia | 4/28 (14 %) | 0 (0 %) | 4/10 (40 %) | 0.010 | |
| B | Central apnoea syndrom | 4/27 (15 %) | 0/17 (0 %) | 4/10 (40 %) | 0.012 |
| AHI>5/h | 2/27 (7 %) | 0/17 (0 %) | 2/10 (20 %) | 0.13 | |
| Obstructive apnoea syndrom | 15/27 (56 %) | 9/17 (53 %) | 6/10 (60 %) | 1.00 | |
| OAHI>5 | 2/27 (7 %) | 2/17 (12 %) | 0/10 (0 %) | 0.52 |
| Variable | Total population (n=28) | Group 1 (n=18) | Group 2 (before operation) (n=10) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOT | 65.6 (65.3 – 76.5) | 66 (64 – 76) | 62,3.0 (66 – 77.5) | 0.655* |
| Somaesthetic Ratio | 97.0 (91.5 - 98.5) | 97.5 (95.0 - 98.0) | 95.0 (68.1 - 99.0) | 0.37* |
| Visual Ratio | 85.5 (74.5 - 91.5) | 86.0 (79.0 - 91.0) | 85.0 (65.3 - 95.0) | 0.98 |
| Vestibular Ratio | 60.0 (40.5 - 69.0) | 61.0 (41.0 - 69.0) | 56.4 (39.0 - 64.0) | 0.41 |
| Lateral deviation | 9 (32 %) | 3 (17 %) | 6 (60%) | 0.35 |
| Inappropriate strategy | 11 (39 %) | 6 (33 %) | 5 (50 %) | 0.44 |
| Group 2 (n° 10) | Before surgery | After surgery | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| SOT | 62.3 (66 – 77.5) | 73.9 (67 – 80.8) | 0.007 |
| Somaesthetic Ratio | 85.7 (73.5 – 98.5) | 97.6 (95.3 – 99.5) | 0.096 |
| Visual Ratio | 73.1 (68.5 – 94.3) | 85.1 (74.8 – 93.5) | 0.084 |
| Vestibular Ratio | 49.5 (42 – 63) | 65.3 (60.5 – 77.5) | 0.005 |
| Lateral deviation | 6/10 (60%) | 0/10 (0%) | 0.011* |
| Inappropriate strategy | 5/10 (50%) | 1/10 (10%) | 0.141* |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).