Submitted:
20 August 2024
Posted:
21 August 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Psychology of Entrepreneurship Framework
2.1.1. Cognition and Alertness
2.1.2. Environmental Psychology
2.1.3. Entrepreneurial Mindset
2.2. System Dynamics and Entrepreneurial Mindset
3. Primary Objective
4. Method
5. Results and Sources of Data
- Gender representation,
- Total early-stage entrepreneurial activity,
- Entrepreneurial intentions
- Green entrepreneurship education,
- Values and norms.
6. Discussions and Contributions
7. Conclusion
Author Contributions
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Cummings, T. G. & Worley, G. (2015). Organisation development and change. 10th ed. Cengage Learning. [CrossRef]
- Cummings, T.G.; Cummings, C. The Relevance Challenge in Management and Organization Studies: Bringing Organization Development Back In. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 2020, 56, 521–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Forrester, J. W. From the ranch to system dynamics. In Management Laureates; 2018; pp. 335–370. [Google Scholar]
- Sterman, J. System dynamics at sixty: the path forward. Syst. Dyn. Rev. 2018, 34, 5–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rousseau, D.; Billingham, J.; Wilby, J.; Blachfellner, S. The synergy between general systems theory and the available systems worldview. System: Connecting matter, life, culture, and technology 2016, 4, 61–75. [Google Scholar]
- Roth, S. The open theory and its enemy: Implicit moralisation as epistemological obstacle for general systems theory. Syst. Res. Behav. Sci. 2019, 36, 281–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teece, D.J. Dynamic capabilities as (workable) management systems theory. J. Manag. Organ. 2018, 24, 359–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frese, M.; Gielnik, M.M. The psychology of entrepreneurship. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior 2014, 1(1), 413–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hisrich, R.; Langan-Fox, J.; Grant, S. Entrepreneurship research and practice: A call to action for psychology. Am. Psychol. 2007, 62, 575–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Urban, B. Entrepreneurial alertness, self-efficacy and social entrepreneurship intentions. J. Small Bus. Enterp. Dev. 2020, 27, 489–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leaf, C. (2013). Switch on your brain: The key to peak happiness, thinking, and health. Baker books.
- Leaf, C. (2018). Think, learn, succeed: Understanding and using your mind to thrive at school, the workplace, and in life. Baker books.
- Sharma, G.D.; Paul, J.; Srivastava, M.; Yadav, A.; Mendy, J.; Sarker, T.; Bansal, S. Neuroentrepreneurship: an integrative review and research agenda. Entrep. Reg. Dev. 2021, 33, 863–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Busic-Sontic, A.; Czap, N.V.; Fuerst, F. The role of personality traits in green decision-making. J. Econ. Psychol. 2017, 62, 313–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diale, C.D.; Kanakana-Katumba, M.G.; Maladzhi, R.W. Ecosystem of Renewable Energy Enterprises for Sustainable Development: A Systematic Review. Adv. Sci. Technol. Eng. Syst. J. 2021, 6, 401–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diale, C.D.; Kanakana-Katumba, G.; Maladzhi, R.W. Green Entrepreneurship Model Utilising the System Dynamics Approach: A Review. 2019 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM). LOCATION OF CONFERENCE, COUNTRYDATE OF CONFERENCE; pp. 384–389.
- Diale, C.D. A South African green entrepreneurship model utilising the system dynamics approach. Doctoral dissertation, University of South Africa, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Guruswamy, L. Energy justice and sustainable development. Colo. J. Int’l Envtl. L. & Pol’y 2010, 21, 231. [Google Scholar]
- Nhamo, G. Green economy readiness in South Africa: A focus on the national sphere of government. Int. J. Afr. Renaiss. Stud. - Multi-, Inter- Transdiscipl. 2013, 8, 115–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nunes, A.R.; Lee, K.; O'Riordan, T. The importance of an integrating framework for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals: The example of health and well-being. BMJ Glob. Health 2016, 1, e000068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- OECD. The inequalities-environment nexus: towards a people-centred green transition. OECD Green Growth Papers, No. 2021/01. OECD Publishing: Paris, Frence, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Venter, C.; Jennings, G.; Hidalgo, D.; Pineda, A.F.V. The equity impacts of bus rapid transit: A review of the evidence and implications for sustainable transport. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 2017, 12, 140–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diale, C.D.; Kanakana-Katumba, M.G.; Maladzhi, R.W. Environmental Entrepreneurship as an Innovation Catalyst for Social Change: A Systematic Review as a Basis for Future Research. Adv. Sci. Technol. Eng. Syst. J. 2021, 6, 393–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Monitor, G. E. (2015). Global entrepreneurship monitor. Entrepreneurship in Brazil (National Report). Curitiba: Brazilian Institute of Quality and Productivity, Paraná. https://www.gemconsortium. 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Bosma, N. , Schøtt, T., Terjesen, S. A., & Kew, P. (2016). Global entrepreneurship monitor 2015 to 2016: Special topic report on social entrepreneurship. Available at SSRN 2786949. [CrossRef]
- Karabulut, A.T. Personality Traits on Entrepreneurial Intention. Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci. 2016, 229, 12–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McClelland, E.; Swail, J.; Bell, J.; Ibbotson, P. Following the pathway of female entrepreneurs. Int. J. Entrep. Behav. Res. 2005, 11, 84–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diale, C. D. (2016). Black African women in South African male-dominated entrepreneurial environments. University of Pretoria (South Africa).
- Bergset, L. The Rationality and Irrationality of Financing Green Start-Ups. Adm. Sci. 2015, 5, 260–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gast, J.; Gundolf, K.; Cesinger, B. Doing business in a green way: A systematic review of the ecological sustainability entrepreneurship literature and future research directions. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 147, 44–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moskwa, E.; Higgins-Desbiolles, F.; Gifford, S. Sustainability through food and conversation: the role of an entrepreneurial restaurateur in fostering engagement with sustainable development issues. J. Sustain. Tour. 2014, 23, 126–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oguonu, C. Business Strategies for Effective Entrepreneurship: A Panacea for Sustainable Development and Livelihood in the Family. Int. J. Manag. Sustain. 2015, 4, 10–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Walley, L. , Taylor, D., & Greig, K. (2010). Beyond the visionary champion: Testing a typology of green entrepreneurs. In M, Schaper (Ed.) Making Ecopreneurs: Developing Sustainable Entrepreneurship, pp 59-74.
- Robinson, S.; Stubberud, H.A. Green innovation and environmental impact in Europe. Journal of International Business Research 2015, 14(1), 127. [Google Scholar]
- Silajdžić, I.; Kurtagić, S.M.; Vučijak, B. Green entrepreneurship in transition economies: a case study of Bosnia and Herzegovina. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 88, 376–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nikolaou, I.E.; Tasopoulou, K.; Tsagarakis, K. A Typology of Green Entrepreneurs Based on Institutional and Resource-based Views. J. Entrep. 2018, 27, 111–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. 2017. Available online: https://www.gemconsortium.org/file/open?fileId=50411 (accessed on 3 April 2021).
- Diale, D.; Carrim, N.M. Experiences of black African women entrepreneurs in the South African male-dominated entrepreneurial environments. J. Psychol. Afr. 2022, 32, 216–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bloodgood, J.M.; Hornsby, J.S.; Burkemper, A.C.; Sarooghi, H. A system dynamics perspective of corporate entrepreneurship. Small Bus. Econ. 2015, 45, 383–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, J.; Chen, L.; Chen, J.; Xie, K. Mechanism and policy combination of technical sustainable entrepreneurship crowdfunding in China: A system dynamics analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 177, 610–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berg, D.; Kolomytseva, A.; Apanasenko, A.; Isaichik, K. Modelling of the Municipality Entrepreneurial Community Functioning Using the Methods of System Dynamics. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2018, 51, 61–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naumann, C. Entrepreneurial Mindset: A Synthetic Literature Review. Entrep. Bus. Econ. Rev. 2017, 5, 149–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zali, M.; Najafian, M.; Colabi, A. M. System dynamics modeling in entrepreneurship research: A review of the literature. International Journal of Supply and Operations Management 2014, 1, 347–370. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, D.D.; Kefan, X.; Hua, L.; Shi, Z.; Olson, D.L. Modeling technological innovation risks of an entrepreneurial team using system dynamics: An agent-based perspective. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2010, 77, 857–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aparicio, S.; Urbano, D.; Gómez, D. The role of innovative entrepreneurship within Colombian business cycle scenarios: A system dynamics approach. Futures 2016, 81, 130–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Busenitz, L.W.; Barney, J.B. Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: Biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making. J. Bus. Ventur. 1997, 12, 9–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Madsen, G.; Zakar, T.; Ku, C.Y.; Sanborn, B.M.; Smith, R.; Mesiano, S. Prostaglandins Differentially Modulate Progesterone Receptor-A and -B Expression in Human Myometrial Cells: Evidence for Prostaglandin-Induced Functional Progesterone Withdrawal. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2004, 89, 1010–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haynie, J.M.; Shepherd, D.; Mosakowski, E.; Earley, P.C. A situated metacognitive model of the entrepreneurial mindset. J. Bus. Ventur. 2010, 25, 217–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mathisen, J.E.; Arnulf, J.K. Entrepreneurial Mindsets: Theoretical Foundations and Empirical Properties of a Mindset Scale. Acad. Manag. Proc. 2012, 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mitchell, R.K.; Busenitz, L.; Lant, T.; McDougall, P.P.; Morse, E.A.; Smith, J.B. Toward a Theory of Entrepreneurial Cognition: Rethinking the People Side of Entrepreneurship Research. Entrep. Theory Pr. 2002, 27, 93–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McCLELLAND, D.C. Characteristics of Successful Entrepreneurs*. J. Creative Behav. 1987, 21, 219–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Forrester, J. W. (2009). Some basic concepts in system dynamics. Sloan School of Management, 1-17.
- Gokhan, M.; Yücel, M.; Ayvaz, B. Causal Loop Analysis and improvement areas of AS 9100 aerospace quality management system implementation in Turkish aerospace and defence industry supply chain. International Journal of supply chain management 2019, 8(3), 685. [Google Scholar]
- Meadows, D. The unavoidable apriori: A discussion of significant modelling paradigms. The System Dynamics Method, Oslo, 161240. 1977. [Google Scholar]
- Boeing, G. Visual Analysis of Nonlinear Dynamical Systems: Chaos, Fractals, Self-Similarity and the Limits of Prediction. Systems 2016, 4, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roubík, H.; Mazancová, J.; Rydval, J.; Kvasnička, R. Uncovering the dynamic complexity of the development of small–scale biogas technology through causal loops. Renew. Energy 2019, 149, 235–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qian, E.; Kramer, B.; Peherstorfer, B.; Willcox, K. Lift & Learn: Physics-informed machine learning for large-scale nonlinear dynamical systems. Phys. D: Nonlinear Phenom. 2020, 406, 132401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]



| Dynamic variable |
Ratio | The capability to grow by the following percentage in 2030 |
|---|---|---|
| Gender representation | 0.8 | 7% |
| Total early- stage entrepreneurial activity |
1.1 | 1% |
| Values and norms |
4.4 | 4% |
| Entrepreneurial intentions | 1.2 | 1% |
| Number of green education and 10 258 skills programme |
10.26 | 87% |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).