Submitted:
23 July 2024
Posted:
24 July 2024
Read the latest preprint version here
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
Laboratory Investigations
Thoracic Radiography
Echocardiography
Anesthetic and Analgesic Protocol
Surgical Intervention
Evaluation
3. Results
Transthoracic Echocardiography Findings at 4 Months after Mitral Valve Repair
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Dal-Bianco, J.P.; Beaudoin, J.; Handschumacher, M.D.; Levine, R.A. Basic Mechanisms of Mitral Regurgitation. Can. J. Cardiol. 2014, 30, 971–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- van Staveren, M.D.B.; Muis, E.; Szatmári, V. Self-Reported Utilization of International (ACVIM Consensus) Guidelines and the Latest Clinical Trial Results on the Treatment of Dogs with Various Stages of Myxomatous Mitral Valve Degeneration: A Survey among Veterinary Practitioners. Animals 2024, 14, 772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Keene, B.W.; Atkins, C.E.; Bonagura, J.D.; Fox, P.R.; Häggström, J.; Fuentes, V.L.; Oyama, M.A.; Rush, J.E.; Stepien, R.; Uechi, M. ACVIM consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of myxomatous mitral valve disease in dogs. J. Veter- Intern. Med. 2019, 33, 1127–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uechi, M. Mitral valve repair in dogs. J. Vet. Cardiol. 2012, 14, 185–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Uechi, M.; Mizukoshi, T.; Mizuno, T.; Mizuno, M.; Harada, K.; Ebisawa, T.; Takeuchi, J.; Sawada, T.; Uchida, S.; Shinoda, A.; et al. Mitral valve repair under cardiopulmonary bypass in small-breed dogs: 48 cases (2006–2009). J. Am. Veter- Med Assoc. 2012, 240, 1194–1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mihara, K.; Kanemoto, I.; Sato, K.; Yasuhira, Y.; Watanabe, I.; Suzuki, Y.; Nagura, J.; Misumi, K. Effects of mitral valve repair on valvular geometry and hemodynamics in dogs with myxomatous mitral valve disease. Vet. Surg. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nyman, C.B.; Mackensen, G.B.; Jelacic, S.; Little, S.H.; Smith, T.W.; Mahmood, F. Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair Using the Edge-to-Edge Clip. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 2018, 31, 434–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pan, W.; Long, Y.; Guo, Y.; Pan, C.; Wei, L.; Liu, X.; Luo, J.; Chen, L.; Zhou, D.; Ge, J. Transapical Edge-to-Edge Repair System in High-Risk Patients With Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation. JACC: Cardiovasc. Interv. 2023, 16, 2340–2342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hu, M.-C.; Yang, Y.-L.; Chen, T.-T.; Lee, C.-I.; Tam, K.-W. Recruitment maneuvers to reduce pulmonary atelectasis after cardiac surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized trials. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2022, 164, 171–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Thomas, W.P.; Gaber, C.E.; Jacobs, G.J.; Kaplan, P.M.; Lombard, C.W.; Vet, M.; Moise, N.S.; Moses, B.L. Recommendations for Standards in Transthoracic Two-Dimensional Echocardiography in the Dog and Cat. J. Veter- Intern. Med. 1993, 7, 247–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cornell, C.C.; Kittleson, M.D.; Della Torre, P.; Häggström, J.; Lombard, C.W.; Pedersen, H.D.; Vollmar, A.; Wey, A. Allometric Scaling of M-Mode Cardiac Measurements in Normal Adult Dogs. J. Veter- Intern. Med. 2004, 18, 311–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sasaki, K.; Ma, D.; Mandour, A.S.; Ozai, Y.; Yoshida, T.; Matsuura, K.; Takeuchi, A.; Cheng, C.-J.; El-Husseiny, H.M.; Hendawy, H.; et al. Evaluation of Changes in the Cardiac Function before and after Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Mitral Valve Repair in Healthy Dogs: Conventional and Novel Echocardiography. Animals 2021, 12, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Naveiro-Rilo, J.C.; Diez-Juárez, D.M.; Blanco, A.R.; Rebollo-Gutierrez, F.; Rodriguez-Martinez, A.; Rodriguez-Garcia, M.A. Validation of the Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire in primary care. Rev. Espanola De Cardiol. 2010, 63, 1419–1427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Polderman, K.H.; Girbes, A.R. Severe electrolyte disorders following cardiac surgery: a prospective controlled observational study. Crit. Care 2004, 8, R459–R466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Feldman T, Kar S, Rinaldi M, et al. Percutaneous mitral repair with the MitraClip system: safety and midterm durability in the initial EVEREST (Endovascular Valve Edge to-Edge REpair Study) cohort. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:686-94.
- Whitlow PL, Feldman T, Pedersen WR, et al. Acute and 12-month results with catheterbased mitral valve leaflet repair: the EVEREST II (Endovascular Valve Edge-to-Edge Repair) high risk study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59:130-9.
- Feldman T, Kar S, Elmariah S, et al. Randomized comparison of percutaneous repair and surgery for mitral regurgitation: 5-year results of EVEREST II. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66:2844-54.
- Ruaux, C.; Scollan, K.; Suchodolski, J.S.; Steiner, J.M.; Sisson, D.D. Biologic variability in NT-proBNP and cardiac troponin-I in healthy dogs and dogs with mitral valve degeneration. Veter- Clin. Pathol. 2015, 44, 420–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sepolvere, G.; Scialdone, V.R. Chronic pain in cardiac surgery. Minerva Anestesiol. 2023, 89, 230–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Feray, S.; Lemoine, A.; Aveline, C.; Quesnel, C. Pain management after thoracic surgery or chest trauma. Minerva Anestesiol. 2023, 89, 1022–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Thompson-Brazill, K.A. Pain Control in the Cardiothoracic Surgery Patient. Crit. Care Nurs. Clin. North Am. 2019, 31, 389–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Grubb, T.; Lobprise, H. Local and regional anaesthesia in dogs and cats: Overview of concepts and drugs (Part 1). Veter- Med. Sci. 2020, 6, 209–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Boswell, M.R.; Moman, R.N.; Burtoft, M.; Gerdes, H.; Martinez, J.; Gerberi, D.J.; Wittwer, E.; Murad, M.H.; Hooten, W.M. Lidocaine for postoperative pain after cardiac surgery: a systematic review. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2021, 16, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kreuziger, L.B.; Karkouti, K.; Tweddell, J.; Massicotte, M.P. Antithrombotic therapy management of adult and pediatric cardiac surgery patients. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2018, 16, 2133–2146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, J.; Wang, H.; Xie, X.; Dai, H.; Zhou, M.; Zheng, Y.; Zhao, L. Long-term left atrial thrombi after mitral valve replacement. J. Thromb. Thrombolysis 2021, 51, 129–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- El Shaer, A.; Mahayni, A.; Simard, T.; Eleid, M.; Guerrero, M.; Rihal, C.S.; Alkhouli, M. Baseline Left Atrial Pressure Predicts Mortality Following Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Mitral Valve Repair. JACC: Cardiovasc. Interv. 2021, 14, 2306–2308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Thaden, J.J.; Malouf, J.F.; Nkomo, V.T.; Pislaru, S.V.; Holmes, D.R.; Reeder, G.S.; Rihal, C.S.; Eleid, M.F. Mitral Valve Anatomic Predictors of Hemodynamic Success with Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair. J. Am. Hear. Assoc. 2018, 7, e007315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Neuss, M.; Schau, T.; Isotani, A.; Pilz, M.; Schöpp, M.; Butter, C. Elevated Mitral Valve Pressure Gradient After MitraClip Implantation Deteriorates Long-Term Outcome in Patients with Severe Mitral Regurgitation and Severe Heart Failure. JACC: Cardiovasc. Interv. 2017, 10, 931–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ross, E.S.; Visser, L.C.; Sbardellati, N.; Potter, B.M.; Ohlendorf, A.; Scansen, B.A. Utility of vertebral left atrial size and vertebral heart size to aid detection of congestive heart failure in dogs with respiratory signs. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2023, 37, 2021–2029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]





| Parameter | Patient 1 | Patient 2 | Patient 3 | Patient 4 | ||||
| Before | After | Before | After | Before | After | Before | After | |
| Happiness | ||||||||
| (1) My dog wants to play. | 3 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| (2) My dog reacts to my presence. | 5 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 5 |
| (3) My dog enjoys life. | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 5 |
| Happiness score | 11 | 13 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 14 |
| Mental status | ||||||||
| (1) My dog shakes or trembles. | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| (2) My dog seems depressed and not alert. | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 |
| Mental status score | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 0 |
| Hygiene | ||||||||
| (1) My dog keeps him/herself clean. | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| (2) My dog smells like urine or has skin irritation. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| (3) My dog’s hair is greasy and rough. | 1 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 |
| Hygiene score | 5 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Physical function | ||||||||
| (1) My dog rests and sleeps all day long. | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 1 |
| (2) My dog lays in one place all day long. | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| (3) My dog moves normally. | 3 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 5 |
| (4) My dog is in pain. | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| (5) My dog coughs and pants frequently even at rest. | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 1 |
| (6) My dog has swelling on the legs and ascites. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Physical function score | 12 | 12 | 8 | 8 | 16 | 16 | 10 | 7 |
| Parameter | Patient 1 | Patient 2 | Patient 3 | Patient 4 | Reference value | ||||
| Before | After | Before | After | Before | After | Before | After | ||
| Age | 9 years | 14 years | 9 years | 11 years | - | ||||
| Gender | Female | Male | Female | Male | - | ||||
| Breed | Beagle | Pomeranian | Chihuahua | Poodle | - | ||||
| MMVD stage | B2 | C | C | B2 | - | ||||
| Vertebral heart size (VHS) [29] | 11.2 | 11.5 | 12 | 10.5 | 11.1 | ||||
| Vertebral left atrial size (VLAS) [29] | 2.5 | 2.9 | 3.1 | 3 | 2.1 | ||||
| WBC (x103/uL) | 5.51 | 6.67 | 6.85 | 10.18 | 7.35 | 7.6 | 15.0 | 11.2 | 6-17 |
| RBC (x106/uL) | 8.85 | 8.26 | 5.77 | 5.87 | 7.71 | 5.9 | 6.13 | 8.15 | 5-9 |
| HGB (gm%) | 16.8 | 18.8 | 13.6 | 13.6 | 17.6 | 14.4 | 12.9 | 14.2 | 12-18 |
| PCV (%) | 57.36 | 53.8 | 38.3 | 37.9 | 50.0 | 40 | 40.9 | 50.7 | 30-55 |
| Platelets (x103/uL) | 232 | 304 | 261 | 280 | 416 | 401 | 215 | 324 | 200-900 |
| Segmented neutrophil (x103/uL) | 3.66 | 6.9 | 5.71 | 8.08 | 8.1 | 8.6 | 8.5 | 8.6 | 3-11.5 |
| Lymphocyte (x103/uL) | 1.39 | 2.0 | 7.2 | 6.9 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 1-4.8 |
| Monocyte (x103/uL) | 0.38 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.15-1.35 |
| Eosinophil (x103/uL) | 0.06 | 0.2 | 0.25 | 0.75 | 0.5 | 0 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.1-1.25 |
| BUN (mg%) | 13 | 15.7 | 94 | 44 | 22.2 | 20 | 16.0 | 37 | <34.6 |
| Creatinine (mg%) | 0.9 | 0.88 | 1.7 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.7 | <1.8 |
| Total Protein (gm%) | 6.5 | 7.4 | 7.8 | 6.1 | 6.8 | 7.0 | 9 | 7.6 | 5.3-7.8 |
| ALT (U/L) | 37 | 31 | 452 | 420 | 76 | 48 | 122 | 88 | <89 |
| ALP (U/L) | 109 | 91 | 1911 | 877 | 94 | 85 | 48 | 45 | <108 |
| Parameter | Patient 1 | Patient 2 | Patient 3 | Patient 4 | ||||
| Before | % change After 4 months |
Before | % change After 4 months |
Before | % change After 4 months |
Before | % change After 4 months |
|
| MMVD stage | B2 | C | C | B2 | ||||
| IVSd (cm) | 0.84 | -20.2 | 0.70 | -7.1 | 0.70 | 20.0 | 0.74 | -20.3 |
| LVIDd (cm) | 4.26 | 17.6 | 3.80 | 15.0 | 3.69 | 8.9 | 2.86 | 25.9 |
| LVPWd (cm) | 0.72 | -20.8 | 0.80 | 15.0 | 0.60 | 8.3 | 0.56 | -44.6 |
| IVSs (cm) | 1.32 | 23.5 | 1.00 | -8.0 | 0.93 | -18.3 | 0.61 | -70.5 |
| LVIDs (cm) | 2.82 | 23.0 | 2.70 | 38.1 | 1.93 | 24.9 | 1.99 | 32.2 |
| LVPWs (cm) | 0.89 | -30.3 | 1.10 | 1.8 | 0.95 | -12.6 | 0.57 | -61.4 |
| FS (%) | 33.9 | -13.2 | 34.0 | -41.5 | 47.1 | -18.2 | 30.59 | -18.9 |
| LA (cm) | 2.55 | 8.2 | 3.29 | 15.2 | 2.7 | -7.8 | 2.15 | 17.2 |
| LA/Ao ratio | 1.44 | 4.9 | 2.95 | 35.3 | 2.74 | 8.8 | 2.06 | 17.5 |
| MV E/A ratio | 0.78 | -15.4 | 2.86 | 62.9 | 0.6 | -75.0 | 1.0 | 4.0 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).