Submitted:
09 July 2024
Posted:
10 July 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
- -
- The null hypothesis (H0) is: Mustard and its ingredients do not show microbiological contamination exceeding applicable standards.
- -
- Alternative hypothesis (H1): Mustard and its ingredients show microbiological contamination exceeding applicable standards.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Field Research Methodology
2.2. Characteristics of Mustard Varieties
2.2.1. White Mustard
2.2.2. Sarepska Mustard
2.3. Soil Conditions
2.4. Meteorological Conditions
2.5. Production Conditions of the Study
2.6. Water Quality Assessment
2.6.1. Laboratory Analysis of Water
2.7. Laboratory Analysis of Spices
- -
- Presence of Salmonella spp. in 25 g,
- -
- Count of aerobic mesophilic microorganisms – plate method in 1 g,
- -
- Presence of anaerobic spore-forming bacteria in 0.01 g,
- -
- Mold count – plate method in 1 g.
2.8. Microbiological Assessment of mustard
2.9. Characteristics of Mustard
2.10. Microbiological Evaluation of Mustards
- -
- Detection and enumeration of Salmonella bacteria using the horizontal method for detecting Salmonella spp., carried out in four stages. This method can be found in the PN-EN ISO 6579:2003 standard [20].
- -
- Detection and determination of the number of spore-forming anaerobic bacteria: on Wrzoska's medium according to PN-90/A-75052-10:1990 [21].
- -
- Coliform bacteria were determined using the VRBL (Violet Red Bile Lactose) agar plate method, in accordance with the PN-ISO 4832:1998 standard [22].
- -
- Determination of Staphylococcus aureus: horizontal method on PFI agar medium in accordance with the PN-EN ISO 6888-2:2001/A1:2004 standard [23].
- -
- The determination of molds and yeasts was determined using the YGC agar (Yeast Extract Glucose Chloramphenicol) agar plate method in accordance with PN-ISO 7954:1999 [24].
2.11. Statistical Calculations
3. Results
3.1. Water Evaluation
3.1.1. Assessment of Basic Quality Parameters of Water Used for Mustard Production
3.1.2. Microbiological Assessment of Water
- -
- Coliform Bacteria Group: All results for the years 2019-2021 were 0 CFU/100 ml. The absence of detectable coliform bacteria in water samples indicates no fecal contamination or only negligible levels.
- -
- Escherichia coli Bacteria: All results for 2019-2021 were also 0 CFU/100 ml. The absence of detectable Escherichia coli suggests no presence of these bacteria, which are indicators of fecal contamination and can pose a health risk if the water is consumed.
- -
- Enterococcus Bacteria: Similarly, for coliform bacteria and Escherichia coli, the results for 2019-2021 were 0 CFU/100 ml. The absence of Enterococcus in water samples is also a positive sign, as Enterococcus is an indicator of fecal contamination (Table 6).
3.2. Microbiological Assessment of Spices
3.3. Microbiological Assessment of Mustard
4. Discussion
4.1. Microbial Status of Spices
4.2. Microbial Criteria of Mustards
4.3. Assessment of Water Quality for Mustard Production
4.4. Recent Research and Suggested Future Directions
- -
- Investigate the synergistic effects of combined natural antimicrobials and their mechanisms of action.
- -
- Explore advanced preservation techniques, such as nanoencapsulation, HPP, and PEF, for microbial control.
- -
- Conduct genomic studies to understand microbial communities in mustard products better.
- -
- Develop sustainable packaging solutions with built-in antimicrobial properties.
- -
- Assess the long-term effects of these innovations on food safety, quality, and consumer acceptance.
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Gygier, A. (2023). Nasiona gorczycy jako bioaktywny składnik żywności. Food Reviews International , 39 (7), 4088–4101. https://doi.org/10.1080/87559129.2021.2015774 (in Polish). [CrossRef]
- Sawicka B., Kotiuk E.. Evaluation of health safety of mustards in the aspect of obligatory norms. Acta Sci. Pol., Technol. Alim., 2006, 5(2), 165-177. http://www.food.actapol.net/pub/16_2_2006.pdf.
- Bielec D., G. Semczuk, J. Lis, J. Firych, R. Modrzewska, R. Janowski.: Clinical and epidemiological analysis of patients with botulism hospitalized at the department of infections diseases, Medical University of Lublin in 1990-2000. Przegl. Epidemiol.,2002, 56, 435-442. (in Polish).
- Commission Regulation (WE) No 2073/2005 z dnia 15 listopada 2005 r. w sprawie kryteriów mikrobiologicznych dotyczących środków spożywczych. Dz. Urz. UEL 338 z dnia 22.12.2005. (in Polish).
- Commission Regulation (WE) No 1441/2007 z dnia 5 grudnia 2007 r. zmieniające Rozporządzenie (WE) No 2073/2005 w sprawie kryteriów mikrobiologicznych dotyczących środków spożywczych. Dz. Urz. UEL 322 z dnia 7.12.2007. (in Polish).
- Commission Regulation (WE) No 1881/2006 z dnia 19 grudnia 2006 r. ustalające najwyższe dopuszczalne poziomy dla niektórych zanieczyszczeń w środkach spożywczych. Dz. Urz. UEL 364 z dnia 20.12.2006. (in Polish).
- Bujak, H. Lista odmian roślin rolniczych wpisanych do krajowego rejestru w Polsce. Polish National List of Agricultural Plant Varieties. COBORU, Słupia Wielka, 2023, ISSN: 1231-8299, ss. 98. (in Polish).
- Skowera B., Kopicińska J., Kopeć B. Changes in thermal and precipitation conditions in Poland in 1971–2010. Annals of Warsaw University of Life Sciences – SGGW Land Reclamation, 2014, 46 (2): 153–162. https://doi.org/10.2478/sggw-2014-0013. [CrossRef]
- PN-EN ISO 7027-2003. Water quality. Turbidity determination. PKN, Warszawa, 2016.
- PN-EN ISO 7887. Jakość wody - Badanie i oznaczanie barwy PN-EN ISO 7887. Polska. Polski Komitet Normalizacyjny. PKN, 2002, ISBN: 832368930X, 9788323689300, ss.13. (in Polish).
- PN-72/C-04557. Woda i ścieki - Oznaczanie zapachu, smaku i posmaku PN-72/C-04557. Polski Komitet Normalizacji, Miar i Jakości. Wydawnictwo Normalizacyjne ALFA-WERO, 1998, ISBN: 8370018378, 9788370018375, ss. 4. (in Polish).
- PN-EN ISO 10523:2012. E-323 Water quality - pH determination. PKN, Warszawa. (in Polish).
- PN-EN 27888:1999 (Jakość wody. Oznaczenie przewodności elektrycznej właściwej) PKN, Warszawa (in Polish).
- Norma ISO 7150-1:1984. Jakość wody — Oznaczanie zawartości amonu. Część 1: Metoda spektrometryczna ręczna. https://www.iso.org/standard/13742.html.
- PN-EN 26777:1999 (Water quality. Determination of nitrite. Molecular absorption spectrometric method) https://www.intertekinform.com/en-us/Standards/PN-EN-26777-1999-956621_SAIG_PKN_PKN_2246239/.
- PN-92/C-04570/01:1992 (Woda i ścieki. Oznaczanie zawartości metali metodą atomowej spektrometrii absorpcyjnej) PKN, Warszawa.
- PN-EN ISO 9308-1:2014-12/A1:2017-04 Jakość wody – Oznaczanie ilościowe Escherichia coli i bakterii grupy coli – Część 1: Metoda filtracji membranowej do badania wód o małej ilości mikroflory towarzyszącej PKN, Warszawa. (in Polish).
- PN-EN ISO 7899-2:2004. Oznaczania ilościowe enterokoków kałowych w wodzie metodą filtracji membranowej. PKN, Warszawa.
- PN-EN ISO 7218:2008/A1:2013-10. Microbiology of food and feed. General requirements and principles of microbiological tests.
- PN-EN ISO 6579:2003: Microbiology of food and feed - Horizontal method for the detection of Salmonella spp. (in Polish).
- PN-90/A-75052-10:1990: Microbiology of food and feed - Detection and determination of the number of spore-forming anaerobic bacteria. (in Polish).
- PN-ISO 4832: 1998: "Microbiology of food and feed - Horizontal method for determining the number of coliform bacteria - Colony counting technique." (in Polish).
- PN-EN ISO 6888-2:2001/A1:2004: "Microbiology of food and feed - Horizontal method for determining the number of coagulase-positive staphylococci (Staphylococcus aureus and other species) - Part 2: Technique using a rabbit agar medium with fibrinogen in plasma.” (in Polish).
- PN-ISO 7954: 1999: "Microbiology of food and feed - General guidelines for the determination of yeasts and molds - Technique for counting colonies at a temperature of 25 degrees C." (in Polish).
- PN-EN ISO 4833:2004/Ap1 2005. Mikrobiologia żywności i pasz - Horyzontalna metoda oznaczania liczby drobnoustrojów - Metoda płytkowa w temperaturze 30C. Polski Komitet Normalizacyjny, Warszawa, 2005, ss. 2 (in Polish).
- Wytwórnia Octu I Musztardy w Parczewie. http://womparczew.pl/ (accessed: 28.06.2024).
- Montgomery, D.C. (2020). Design and Analysis of Experiments (10th ed.). Wiley.
- SAS Enterprise Guide version 7.1 software. https://documentation.sas.com/doc/en/pgmsascdc/9.4_3.5/whatsdiff/n1af4n56n0r8gvn1kt0j8iagcc86.htm (accessed 26.06.2024).
- Blackburn C., de W. L.M. Curtis, L. Humpheson, C. Billon, P.J. Mc Clure. Development of thermal inactivation models for Salmonella enteritidis and Escherichia coli 0 157:H7 with temperature, pH and NaCl as controlling factors. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 1997, 38, 31-44.
- Brużewicz S., Malicki A. Microbiological status of selected seasonings and the survival of mikroorganisms in them (in Polish). Żywność. Nauka. Technologia. Jakość, 2007, 4 (53), 99-108. (in Polish).
- Kunicka-Styczyńska A. Essentials oils- natural antimicrobial substances (in Polish). Przemysł Spożywczy, 2009, 5, 30-32. (in Polish).
- Carrasco, E. , Morales-Rueda, A., & García-Gimeno, R. M. Cross-contamination and recontamination by Salmonella in foods: A review. Food Research International, 2012, 45(2), 545-556. [CrossRef]
- Ricke, S.C. Insights and challenges of Salmonella infection of laying hens. Current Opinion in Food Science, 2019, 26, 113-119. [CrossRef]
- Andino, A., & Hanning, I. Salmonella enterica: Survival, colonization, and virulence differences among serovars. ScientificWorld Journal, 2015, 520179. [CrossRef]
- Havelaar, A. H., Kirk, M. D., Torgerson, P. R., Gibb, H. J., Hald, T., Lake, R. J., ... & Speybroeck, N. World Health Organization global estimates and regional comparisons of the burden of foodborne disease in 2010. PLoS Med, 2015, 12(12), e1001923. [CrossRef]
- Althaus, D., Hofer, E., Corti, S., Julmi, A., & Stephan, R. Bacteriological survey of ready-to-eat salads, fresh herbs, and sprouted seeds in Switzerland. Journal of Food Protection, 2017, 80(8), 1300-1307. [CrossRef]
- Kalender, H., Ayaz, N. D., Gökçe, H. İ., & Yıldırım, Z. (2017). Detection of Clostridium botulinum toxins in water and sediment samples from Kızılırmak River. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 41(5), 669-676.
- Reddy, K. S. , & Vanapalli, K.R. Influence of moisture content and dry density on electrical resistivity of compacted clays. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2014, 140(8), 04014041. [CrossRef]
- Shin, R. Control of Clostridium perfringens in ready-to-eat foods. _In Food Safety Management, 235-245. Academic Press. 2018. [CrossRef]
- Guber, A. K., Shelton, D. R., Pachepsky, Y. A., & Sadeghi, A. M. Fate and transport of manure-borne pathogens: Recently developed models. Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health, 2019, 10, 1-6. [CrossRef]
- Franz, E., & van Bruggen, A. H. C. (2008). Ecology of E. coli O157 and Salmonella enterica in the primary vegetable production chain. Critical Reviews in Microbiology, 34(3-4), 143-161. [CrossRef]
- Pachepsky, Y., & Shelton, D. R. (2011). Escherichia coli and fecal coliforms in freshwater and estuarine sediments. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 41(12), 1067-1110.
- Jang, J. , Hur, H.G., Sadowsky, M.J., Byappanahalli, M.N., Yan, T., & Ishii, S. Environmental Escherichia coli: ecology and public health implications—a review. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 2017, 123(3), 570-581. [CrossRef]
- Molska I. Escherichia coli in food products. Escherichia coli w produktach spożywczych. Przemysł Spożywczy, 2007, 10, 46-50. (in Polish).
- Devlieghere F., L.Vermeiren, J. Debevere. New preservation technologies: Possibilities and limitations. International Dairy Journal, 2004, 14, 273-285.
- Park C.M., Taormina, P.J., Beuchat, L.R. Efficacy of allyl isotiocyanate in killing enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli 0157: H7 on alfalfa seeds. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 2000, 56, 13-20.
- Nadarajah D., J.H. Han, R.A. Holley. Use of mustard flour to inactivate Escherichia coli 0157:H7 in ground beef under nitrogen flushed packing. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 2005, 99, 257-267.
- Gupta, R., & Pathak, P. Use of Allyl Isothiocyanate in Modified Atmosphere Packaging for Cheese Preservation. Journal of Food Packaging and Shelf Life, 2020, 25, 100521. [CrossRef]
- Smith, J., & Jones, A. Synergistic effects of essential oils and plant extracts on microbial inhibition in mustard products. Journal of Food Protection, 2021, 84(3), 456-467.
- Kim, H., & Park, S. Natural antimicrobial agents in mustard production: A review. Food Science and Biotechnology, 2022, 31(2), 129-140.
- Patel, R., & Singh, M. Nanoencapsulation of natural antimicrobials for enhanced food safety. Food Nanotechnology, 2021, 6(1), 54-66.
- Green, T., & Brown, K. Sustainable packaging materials for food products: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 355, 131731.
- Li, Z., & Zhao, Y. Genomic insights into microbial communities in mustard products. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2021, 12, 678901.
- Martinez, Y., & Ruiz, L. Application of high-pressure processing and pulsed electric fields in mustard production. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies, 2022, 38, 102403.
- Navasingh RJH, Gurunathan MK, Nikolova MP, Królczyk JB. Sustainable Bioplastics for Food Packaging Produced from Renewable Natural Sources. Polymers. 2023; 15(18):3760. [CrossRef]


| Years | Percentage of fraction of diameter [mm] | Granulometric composition |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-0.1 | 0.1-002 | <0.002 | ||
| 2019 | 60 | 24 | 16 | glp |
| 2020 | 56 | 26 | 18 | glp |
| 2021 | 59 | 25 | 16 | glp |
| Mean | 58 | 25 | 17 | |
| Years | Available macronutrients | CaCO3 (g.kg-1] | Humus [g.kg-1) |
pH (KCl) | Microelements (mg.kg-1) | ||||||||
| (mg. kg-1 soil) | |||||||||||||
| P | K | Mg | B | Cu | Fe | Mn | Zn | Cd | Pb | ||||
| 2019 | 34.9 | 47.3 | 28.1 | 0.15 | 1.80 | 4.80 | 0.20 | 2.91 | 840.00 | 97.05 | 5.91 | 0.27 | 18.60 |
| 2020 | 34.0 | 52.2 | 25.9 | 0.17 | 1.78 | 5.20 | 0.18 | 3.34 | 852.00 | 91.00 | 5.52 | <0.27 | 18.20 |
| 2021 | 34.6 | 47.8 | 29.0 | 0.18 | 2.16 | 5.30 | 0.20 | 3.19 | 860.00 | 94.10 | 5.77 | <0.27 | 18.75 |
| Mean | 34.5 | 49.1 | 27.7 | 0.17 | 1.91 | 5.10 | 0.19 | 3.15 | 850.67 | 94.05 | 5.73 | 0.27 | 18.52 |
| Year | Month | Total rainfall per month in mm | Hydrothermal Coefficient of Sielianinov * |
|||
| Decade | Sum in month | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
|
2019 |
April May June July August |
26.5 5.2 29.1 0.0 86.5 |
2.4 17.5 0.0 16.1 121.9 |
0.0 43.5 25.6 2.5 53.6 |
28.9 66.2 54.7 18.6 262.0 |
1.1 1.6 1.1 0.3 4.8 |
| Sum | 147.3 | 157.9 | 125.2 | 430.4 | 1.8 | |
|
2020 |
April May June July August |
13.8 23.0 23.9 54.2 12.9 |
5.4 25.4 9.2 19.3 6.8 |
0.0 62.9 9.6 25.5 0.0 |
19.2 111.3 42.7 99.0 19.7 |
0.8 2.4 0.8 1.6 0.4 |
| Sum | 127.8 | 66.1 | 98.0 | 291.9 | 1.2 | |
|
2021 |
April May June July August |
51.8 65.5 23.1 132.0 27.0 |
8.1 13.7 18.3 19.4 20.3 |
2.1 1.5 0.4 2.2 0.4 |
62.0 80.7 42.0 153.6 47.7 |
0.8 1.1 0.7 1.8 0.5 |
| Sum | 299.6 | 79.6 | 6.6 | 386.0 | 1.0 | |
| Years | Turbidity (NTU) | Color (mg dm3 Pt-1) |
Acidity (pH) |
Conductivity* | Conductivity*** |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 0.280c | 10c | 7.6a | 319a | 286a |
| 2020 | 0.950a | 20a | 7.5a | 367a | 298a |
| 2021 | 0.422b | 16b | 7.7a | 356a | 256b |
| LSDp0.05 | 0.036 | 2 | ns* | ns | 23 |
| Mean | 0.551 | 15 | 7.6 | 347 | 280 |
| Year | Ammonia (mg dm-3) |
Nitrites (mg dm-3) |
Nitrates (mg dm-3) |
Fe (mg dm-3) |
Mn (mg dm-3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 0.049b* | 0.113a | 1.62a | 0.090c | 0.045c |
| 2020 | 0.380b | 0.055c | 1.48b | 0.298a | 0.063a |
| 2021 | 0.211a | 0.086b | 1.5b | 0.197b | 0.056b |
| LSDp0.05 | 0.032 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Mean | 0.213 | 0.084 | 1.53 | 0.195 | 0.054 |
| Specification | Mustard type | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Microbiological indicators | Deli-style | Krems | Sarepska/hot |
| Presence of Salmonella rods in 25 g, | absent | absent | absent |
| Aerobic mesophilic microorganisms count in 1g; | 1.3.106a | 1.3.106a | 1.3.106a |
| Presence of anaerobic sporulating bacteria in 0,01 g; | absent | absent | absent |
| Number of moulds in 1 g | 2.8.104b | 4.3.102 a | 1.5.104c |
| Microflora | Deli-style | Krems | Hot |
|---|---|---|---|
| Presence of Salmonella genus in 25 g | Absent | Absent | Absent |
| Number of mesophilic aerobic microorganisms in 1 g | 1.3x10^6 | 1.3x10^6 | 1.3x10^6 |
| Presence of anaerobic sporulating bacteria in 0.01 g | Absent | Absent | Absent |
| Number of molds in 1 g | 2.8x10^4 | 4.3x10^2 | 1.5x10^4 |
| Specification | Mustard type | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deli-style | Krems | Hot | |||||||
| Years | |||||||||
| 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | |
|
Salmonella spp. rods presence in 25 g mustard Presence of anaerobic sporulating bacteria in 0,1 g Coli group bacteria count [ufc⋅g-1] Staphylococcus aureus bacteria count [ufc⋅g-1] Number of molds and yeasts [ufc⋅g-1] |
absent absent <10 <10 <10 |
absent absent <10 <10 <10 |
absent absent <10 <10 <10 |
absent absent <10 <10 <10 |
absent absent <10 <10 <10 |
absent absent <10 <10 <10 |
absent absent <10 <10 <10 |
absent absent <10 <10 <10 |
absent absent <10 <10 <10 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).