Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Review

Novel Treatment Modalities of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: Opportunities and Challenges

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Submitted:

03 June 2024

Posted:

03 June 2024

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
Despite the effectiveness of insulin injections in managing hyperglycemia in Type 1 Diabetes, they fall short in addressing autoimmunity and regenerating damaged islets. This review aims to explore the potential of various treatment modalities for T1DM, including mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), MSC-derived exosomes, gene therapy, islet allotransplantation, and pancreatic islet cell transplantation. Results: MSCs demonstrate efficacy in T1DM treatment through immunomodulation and tissue regeneration, although further research is warranted to optimize their therapeutic potential. Gene therapy presents a promising approach despite challenges such as donor shortage and immune rejection. Pancreatic islet cell transplantation emerges as a viable option, albeit with associated risks including graft rejection and the need for immunosuppression. Teplizumab, an FDA-approved humanized monoclonal antibody, revolutionizes the treatment landscape of Type 1 Diabetes by significantly delaying its onset, offering a paradigm shift since the discovery of insulin Conclusion: Ongoing studies and technological advancements in T1DM management offer a promising outlook for improved treatments and possibly even eradication on a global scale. MSCs, MSC-derived exosomes, gene therapy, and pancreatic islet transplantation hold considerable potential.
Keywords: 
type1 diabetes mellitus
;  
mesenchymal stem cells
;  
gene therapy
;  
pancreatic islet cell transplantation
;  
teplizumab
Subject: 
Medicine and Pharmacology  -   Medicine and Pharmacology

1. Introduction

Diabetes mellitus (DM) stands as a chronic metabolic disorder increasingly prevalent worldwide. It is marked by either a partial or complete deficiency in insulin secretion, leading to persistently elevated blood glucose levels. This condition often manifests with an array of complications, including macrovascular issues like coronary heart disease and hypertension, as well as microvascular complications such as diabetic foot, diabetic encephalopathy, and diabetic kidney injury. These complications significantly diminish patients' quality of life and decrease their chances of survival. The global impact of diabetes is substantial, imposing a significant economic and systemic burden on healthcare systems. It is estimated that diabetes affects approximately 422 million people worldwide, the majority living in low-and middle-income countries, and 1.5 million deaths are directly attributed to diabetes each year [1]. Type 1 diabetes, affecting five to ten percent of diabetes cases [2], has historically been dubbed "juvenile diabetes" or insulin-dependent diabetes due to its early onset. It is a chronic condition in which the pancreas produces little or no insulin by itself. For people living with diabetes, access to affordable treatment, including insulin, is critical to their survival. Specifically, both the number of cases and the prevalence of diabetes have been steadily increasing over the past few decades. Management requires life-long insulin replacement with multiple daily insulin injections, insulin pump therapy, or the use of an automated insulin delivery system. In addition to insulin therapy, glucose monitoring with a continuous glucose monitor (CGM) and a blood glucose monitor if a CGM is unavailable is recommended. Furthermore, self-management education and support should incorporate training in glucose monitoring, insulin administration, ketone testing when necessary, nutritional guidance on carbohydrate counting, physical activity, and strategies for preventing and treating hypoglycemia [3].
However, despite the effectiveness of insulin injections in managing hyperglycemia, they fall short in addressing autoimmunity and regenerating damaged islets, which are crucial in Type 1 diabetes management.T1DM is a T-cell-mediated, organ-specific autoimmune disorder which is characterized by beta-cell destruction and decreased insulin production [4]. The pathogenesis of T1D involves the destruction of insulin-releasing pancreatic beta cells, with cellular invasion by both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, resulting in the reduction of beta cell mass [5]. Environmental exposures, in conjunction with genetic predispositions, play pivotal roles in transitioning from islet autoimmunity to full-fledged T1DM. Although researchers have identified more than 50 genetic loci associated with the disease, HLA polymorphisms contribute substantially, accounting for 40-50% of T1D cases [6,7].
The escalating prevalence of Type 1 Diabetes on a global scale has spurred significant advancements in its treatment over the past two decades. This trend has been particularly driven by two key factors: a focus on improving the quality of life for individuals with T1D and the growing recognition of the potential of regenerative medicine approaches to transform diabetes treatment.
Among these, progress has been achieved in areas such as mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), gene therapy, pancreatic islet cell transplantation and new drug Teplizumab, leveraging immune modulation strategies, beta cell regeneration, and enhancing engraftment success rates.
This review aimed to explore the emerging landscape of innovative treatment modalities for Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM), shedding light on both their opportunities and challenges. By offering actionable recommendations to stakeholders in healthcare, research, and policy domains, our goal is to catalyze progress in the field and improve outcomes for individuals living with T1DM.

2. Materials and Methods

A comprehensive literature search was conducted utilizing PubMed, UpToDate, and Google Scholar electronic databases for pertinent English-language articles based on recent updates in the treatment of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus. The search criteria incorporated specific keywords, such as: (“Novel” OR “Recent” OR “Updates” ) AND (“Treatment” OR “Management” OR “Medications”) AND (“Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus” OR “Diabetes Mellitus” OR “Diabetes Mellitus Type 1”). Following the removal of duplicates, the obtained results were organized using citation management tools (Zotero). The articles published in the last 5 years were given preference.

3. Results and Discussion

Standard Treatment by Insulin
The current standard treatment for Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM) is lifelong insulin replacement therapy. Insulin therapy is aimed to mimic the normal physiological secretion of insulin in response to meals and maintain blood glucose levels within a normal range.
The different types of insulin that can be used for T1DM, include rapid-acting, short-acting, intermediate-acting, and long-acting insulin. The insulin type and regimen chosen depend on several factors, including the patient's blood glucose control, lifestyle, and individual needs. Another essential constituent of T1DM is self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG). This involves testing blood glucose levels regularly, usually, multiple times per day, to help adjust insulin doses and monitor blood glucose control.
Additionally, managing Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM) involves implementing lifestyle modifications, such as adopting healthy eating habits and maintaining regular physical activity. It is recommended that individuals with T1DM consume balanced meals with an appropriate carbohydrate intake, timed alongside insulin doses, and incorporate physical activity into their routine. Moreover, education about diabetes and providing support are crucial aspects of T1DM management. Comprehensive education and training on self-management of T1DM, including insulin administration, self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG), adopting healthy dietary patterns, engaging in regular physical activity, and effectively managing hypo and hyperglycemia, should be provided to patients and their families [3]. This holistic approach empowers individuals with T1DM to effectively manage their condition and improve their overall quality of life.
Despite significant advancements in insulin, insulin delivery, and glucose monitoring technology, many people with type 1 diabetes still do not achieve their glycemic goals. The substantial burden of type 1 diabetes on patients and their families must be acknowledged. Major challenges include calculating and timing prandial insulin doses, often from foods with unknown carbohydrate content, adjusting food and insulin during exercise, and managing the cost of therapy. The extensive impact of type 1 diabetes can lead to long-term complications, decreased life expectancy, reduced quality of life, and significant financial strain. Additionally, the psychological stress of acute management and the potential for chronic complications further contribute to the burden. This warrants education programs and regular monitoring for "diabetes burnout," which are essential for everyone with type 1 diabetes.
Future perspectives in insulin replacement therapy including the use of artificial pancreas, immune modulation, stem cell mobilization, β cell encapsulation, and incretins could improve graft survival rate and revascularization in transplanted islets. In certain situations, additional medications, such as GLP-1 receptor agonists or SGLT2 inhibitors, are added to insulin therapy to improve blood glucose control and reduce the risk of complications. However, insulin therapy remains the mainstay of T1DM management [2,8].
Mesenchymal stem cells:
The future of diabetes treatment is centered around promoting beta cell regeneration, achievable through self-replication or differentiation from progenitor cells via stem cell therapy. This approach not only tackles autoimmunity but also enhances endogenous insulin production. Multipotent Stem Cells (MSCs) emerge as a promising tool for these strategies, found primarily in the bone marrow but also in various other tissues [9]. MSCs possess the capability for in vitro differentiation into insulin-secreting cells, alongside immunomodulatory effects and the secretion of growth factors and cytokines [10]. They have demonstrated the ability to differentiate into multiple cell types, including islet cells, depending on specific signaling pathways. Notably, MSCs exhibit hypo-immunogenicity and can be home to injured tissue, making them efficient carriers for therapeutic proteins [11].
Traditionally, combating Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) involves depleting antibodies against T-cells, but this method lacks specificity and may lead to complications. MSCs offer an alternative approach by secreting soluble factors that modulate immune responses, providing greater selectivity in targeting hyper-reactive T cells [12]. Clinical trials have shown reduced levels of islet cell antibodies after MSC treatment, suggesting potential immunomodulatory effects. MSCs also induce the production of regulatory T cells, restoring immune balance and protecting beta cells against damage [13,14].
While the direct transformation of MSCs into beta cells remains unclear, systemic treatment with MSCs has been shown to increase beta cell mass and reverse hyperglycemia in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats [15]. These findings suggest the potential of MSCs in promoting beta cell regeneration and improving glucose metabolism, offering promise for T1D treatment.
Several successful attempts have been made to generate insulin-producing cells in vitro through the trans-differentiation of MSCs. The first report in 2004 showcased the in vitro trans-differentiation of rat MSCs into functional insulin-producing islet cells, effectively controlling blood glucose levels in diabetic rats [16]. The transcription factor Pdx-1 played a pivotal role in facilitating the efficient trans-differentiation of MSCs into beta cells [9,17,18].
Other studies have elucidated the roles of various transcription factors such as paired box gene 4 (PAX4), neurogenin 3 (Ngn3), forkhead box protein A2 (FOXA2), hepatocyte nuclear factor 6 (HNF6), glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), and epidermal growth factor (EGF) in promoting beta cell regeneration [9,19,20,21,22]. Additionally, MSCs have been proposed as a potential source of 'artificial' human islets in vitro due to their ability to differentiate into glucagon and somatostatin-expressing cells [9,23]. Subsequent studies have further demonstrated the formation of islet-like clusters in vitro from MSCs with appropriate stimulation [7,22,23]. These findings underscore the potential of MSCs in generating insulin-producing cells and advancing the field of diabetes treatment. Top of Form
Recent advancements in tissue engineering have highlighted the potential necessity of a biocompatible scaffold for the in vitro generation of artificial islets with functional vasculature from stem cells [26]. However, it is crucial to approach these reports with caution due to the challenges encountered, including the failure to generate functional islets as a whole. This failure can disrupt the balance between insulin and glucagon, potentially leading to complications. Additionally, there have been concerns regarding the tumorigenicity of genetically modified insulin-producing cells [9]. Hence, while tissue engineering holds promise for the development of artificial islets, further research is warranted to address these challenges and ensure the safety and efficacy of such approaches in diabetes treatment.
Despite its potential, the use of MSCs in Type 1 Diabetes therapy poses certain challenges that warrant further investigation. Firstly, MSC therapy, while promising, may not sufficiently address the autoimmune aspect of T1D, necessitating additional immunosuppressive factors to prevent acute autoimmunity. Secondly, the lack of clarity regarding appropriate homing factors towards the pancreas presents an obstacle for MSCs to effectively target desired sites. Additionally, concerns related to the potential contamination of MSCs and the maintenance of stem-cell-like properties to prevent tumorigenicity add complexity to large-scale manufacturing processes. Lastly, the cost-effectiveness of MSC therapy must be carefully evaluated and compared with traditional immunosuppressive therapies to ensure optimal outcomes. Further research is crucial to address these limitations and fully harness the therapeutic potential of MSCs in T1D treatment [9].
Moreover, Mesenchymal Stem Cell Exosomes (MSC-Exos) emerge as another promising approach for managing Diabetes Mellitus. These extracellular vesicles, possessing the same bi-lipid cell membrane as MSCs, have demonstrated effectiveness in various studies focused on tissue repair, including spinal cord, kidney, liver, cardiovascular, and skin injuries [27,28,29]. Primarily involved in processes such as angiogenesis, cell proliferation, and immune regulation, MSC-Exos exhibit low immunogenicity and offer advantages such as easy storage and transport. Their regenerative properties closely resemble those of MSCs, rendering them suitable for repairing a wide range of organ damage associated with DM [27]. Further research into MSC-Exos holds the potential for advancing therapeutic approaches to manage DM effectively. Additionally, MSC-Exos exhibits the capacity to leverage the duodenal homeobox 1 pathway, thereby promoting the regeneration of pancreatic beta cells and enhancing insulin secretion [30].
Additionally, they possess the ability to attract pancreatic tissue. Further research has indicated their effectiveness as therapeutic and regenerative agents in Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) by modulating levels of regulatory T cells, interleukin (IL)-4, IL-10, and transforming growth factor β (TGF-β), consequently improving the autoimmune response in diabetic mice [27,31,32,33]. Moreover, MSC-Exos has demonstrated efficacy in addressing complications associated with diabetes, such as diabetic wounds, nephropathy, and retinopathy [27].
Gene Therapy
Human Gene Therapy, which involves the transfer of engineered genetic material into human cells via viral transduction for disease treatment, employs various techniques to achieve therapeutic outcomes. The process of transferring exogenous DNA to cells and tissues can be accomplished using two main methods: viral and non-viral methods [34]. In the context of Type 1 Diabetes treatment, several delivery vehicles are utilized, each with its advantages and disadvantages. These vehicles include viral vectors such as adenovirus, adeno-associated virus (AAV), and lentivirus, as well as non-viral vectors like plasmid DNA, liposomes, and polymeric nanoparticles. Each delivery vehicle offers unique characteristics that make it suitable for specific applications in gene therapy. However, they also come with limitations such as immunogenicity, size constraints, and efficiency of gene transfer. Careful consideration of these factors is necessary when selecting the appropriate delivery vehicle for gene therapy in Type 1 Diabetes.
Given knowledge of the desired target whose function needs to be suppressed, the suppression of gene expression, along with gene replacement or augmentation, is beneficial for achieving the endpoint of gene therapy.. Nucleic acids as recombinant plasmid DNA and replication-defective viruses have been the leading vectors in gene therapy trials [35]. Recent techniques involve the combination of small interfering RNA (siRNA) and peptide nucleic acids (PNAs) with nucleic acids [36]. In addition to these mainstays, protein duction domains, naked oligonucleotides and liposome formulations have been utilized in gene therapy. However, viral vectors have been extensively used in gene therapy studies for diabetes mellitus type 1 to engineer islets, beta cell surrogates, immune cells, or specific anatomical sites [37].
Gene therapy holds significant promise as a therapeutic approach for Type 1 Diabetes (T1D), particularly through immunomodulation, transplantation, and the development of surrogate beta cells. The autoimmune response targeting beta cells in T1D suggests that certain factors from these cells could be harnessed to regulate the immune system. Beta cell-restricted proteins have been identified as potential autoantigen triggers for T cells, indicating a possible avenue for intervention [37]. Additionally, introducing genetically modified or non-modified immune cells has shown promise in halting the progression of diabetes, highlighting the potential for immunomodulation in T1D therapy [37,38]. Clinical studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of various approaches, including the use of TGF-alpha, soluble IFN-gamma receptor, viral vectors encoding IL-4 & IL-10, regulatory T-cells CD4+ CD25+, NK-T, and CD8+ CD282 cells, in reducing the progression of T1D by suppressing auto-reactive T-cells and amplifying regulatory T-cells [37,39,40,41,42,43,44]. Transplantation of intact islet Langerhans cells, once considered impractical due to the need for multiple donors and lack of long-term control over blood sugar levels, has been revisited [37,45]. By locally expressing immunoregulatory genes and trophic factors such as VEGF and NGF, islet transplants can create a conducive environment for engraftment, while the expression of free-radical scavenging proteins and anti-inflammatory agents by islet cells can enhance graft survival [37]. Moreover, surrogate beta cells offer a promising approach by transferring glucoregulatory genes into tissues less susceptible to autoimmune attacks, such as hepatocytes, skeletal muscle cells, intestinal K cells, and hypothalamic-pituitary cells [37,46]. Transcription factors like PDX-1 and adenoviral vectors encoding betacellulin or PAX-4 have been shown to generate functional beta cells, leading to diabetes reversal [33,47,48]. Gene therapy can also modify non-beta cells like mesenchymal stem cells and hematopoietic stem cells into beta cell lineage, offering potential surrogates [49,50]. While immortalized beta cells have been successful, concerns about oncogenic transformation persist [39]. Continued research into cell cycle control in beta/neonatal islet cells may uncover critical insights for promoting in vivo growth, maintenance, and lifespan extension, further advancing gene therapy as a treatment for T1D [39].
Gene therapy for T1DM offers a promising route to achieving near-normal bloog glucose levels and potentially curing the disease. However, it is accompanied by several adverse effects and challenges that need to be carefully managed and mitigated. These include risks of insertional mutagenesis, host immunogenicity, toxicity, autoimmune reactions, off-target effects, variable efficacy, long-term safety concerns, technical and delivery challenges, and ethical considerations. Continued research and optimization are essential to improve the safety, efficacy, and acceptance of gene therapy as a viable treatment for T1DM.
Pancreatic Islet Cell Transplantation
Over the past thirty years, pancreatic islet isolation and transplantation techniques have turned from a rare, experimental procedure to a routine clinical procedure with predictable efficacy for selected patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus [51]. The treatment is offered only for selected patients with unstable T1DM and hypoglycemia unawareness, severe hypoglycemic episodes, and glycemic lability who cannot be stabilized successfully with intensive insulin, pumps, and/or continuous glucose monitoring therapies [53]. This minimally invasive procedure can now routinely result in long-term glycemic control with near normalization of HbA1c in the absence of severe hypoglycemic episodes [54].
Islet cell transplantation involves extracting pancreatic islet cells from deceased donors and implanting them into the liver of the recipient. The process entails careful isolation of islet cells from the pancreas, using enzyme mixtures to separate islets from exocrine tissues, and subsequent implantation into the liver via a cannula inserted into the pancreatic duct [55].
Despite the progress made in islet transplantation, significant challenges persist. The microenvironment of transplanted sites, encompassing factors like vascularization, extracellular matrix composition, and tissue-resident immune cells, remains poorly understood, hampering efforts to identify optimal transplantation locations. Current research endeavors focus on developing tailored hydrogel-based materials and microdevices to create transplantation spaces, shield grafts from the immune system, and promote angiogenesis. However, achieving normal glycemia with cadaveric human islets or those derived from stem cells remains elusive, and the long-term survival of transplanted islets varies across transplantation sites, influenced by factors like aging and other health conditions. Moreover, uncertainties surround the effectiveness and safety of biomaterials used to encapsulate artificial islets created from stem cells, with concerns about post-implantation trans-differentiation, teratoma formation, or graft migration requiring careful consideration. To enhance the long-term efficacy and safety of islet cell treatment for diabetes patients, efforts must concentrate on improving islet graft survival and functionality in highly vascularized, nutrient- and oxygen-rich environments [56].
While the intrahepatic percutaneous trans-hepatic portal vein approach to islet transplantation is generally regarded as reliable and safe, several associated risks persist. These include the potential for bleeding and portal venous thrombosis, as well as the risk of accidentally puncturing the gallbladder during the procedure. Additionally, mild increases in levels of liver enzymes like alanine transaminase and aspartate transaminase may occur in up to half of patients’ post-procedure, typically resolving within one month without intervention. Furthermore, transient discomfort or modest pain at the site of catheter insertion, often accompanied by referred pain at the right shoulder tip due to diaphragmatic irritation, may affect around half of patients. Fortunately, these symptoms can be effectively managed with standard analgesic medications, with resolution usually occurring within 24 to 48 hours in most cases [54,55].
Teplizumab:
Teplizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that delays the onset of Diabetes Mellitus type 1. This was approved by the FDA in 2022. Teplizumab is the first treatment, which changes the course of Diabetes Mellitus type 1 since the discovery of insulin in 2022. Teplizumab became the first drug to be approved to delay any autoimmune disease before clinical onset. This drug specifically delays the onset of clinical type 1 diabetes in stage 3 in adults and children aged 8 years and above, but the use of intravenous teplizumab on newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes is questionable [57]. Teplizumab is a humanized immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody and it has a high affinity to bind with the c chain of CD3. Teplizumab was first explored for treating acute transplant rejection and psoriatic arthritis[58]. Concurrently, studies in both spontaneous and chemically induced diabetic mouse models demonstrated its potential in reversing or preventing autoimmune diabetes and promoting immune tolerance. Unlike previous immune therapies, continuous administration was unnecessary [59].
Teplizumab leads to decreased insulin use in diabetes patients and the area under the curve (AUC) of the c peptide is much higher. It does not have any effect on Hb1c levels [57]. There is improvement in total and early insulin secretion rates, which identifies a functional as well as a quantitative improvement in insulin release. In addition to quantitative decreases in C-peptide AUC, studies have identified qualitative abnormalities in beta cell secretory kinetics, with loss of early insulin secretion reflecting beta cell dysfunction prior to the onset of T1D [60]. In summary, Teplizumab treatment changes the biologic course of the disease by enhancing beta cell function reflected by the quantitative and qualitative improvements in insulin secretion. These changes were associated with modulation of the frequency and function of memory CD8+ T cells [60].
The primary adverse events observed are lymphopenia, rash, and headache, with most cases occurring during and shortly after the initial weeks of teplizumab treatment. These effects typically resolved on their own without requiring any intervention, reflecting a safety profile marked by temporary adverse events following one or two courses of teplizumab therapy [59].
The study leading to FDA approval for teplizumab was conducted by the TrialNet network, supported by funding from the National Institutes of Health. It aimed to evaluate the impact of a single 14-day infusion course on the progression from stage 2 to stage 3 of type 1 diabetes. Although the trial was relatively small, with 44 participants in the placebo group and 32 in the treatment group, initial findings reported in 2019 indicated that teplizumab infusion delayed the onset of stage 3 type 1 diabetes by a median duration of 24 months. An updated analysis in 2021 revealed that this median delay had extended to 32.5 months [61].
The risks of immunosuppression, side effects, potential long-term safety issues, variable efficacy, high cost, and the need for regular monitoring must be carefully considered when deciding on its use. Ongoing research and long-term studies are essential to fully understand the benefits and drawbacks of Teplizumab and to optimize its use in clinical practice.

5. Conclusions

The potential of Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs) in diabetic therapy is promising, given their attributes as effective immunotherapy and anti-autoimmunity agents. Despite some considerations before widespread application, continued research in biotechnology and regenerative medicine could lead to the incorporation of MSCs into future Type 1 Diabetes treatments. Additionally, Mesenchymal stem cell exosomes offer another avenue for diabetic therapy, although further clinical trials and studies are needed before their adoption as therapeutic agents.
Gene therapy holds promise for maintaining normoglycemia over the long term through islet allotransplantation, which faces challenges such as a lack of cadaveric donors and immune rejection. Stem cells from various sources offer potential solutions to these obstacles, and it's time for human safety testing to explore these modalities further.
Pancreatic islet cell transplantation is a viable treatment option, particularly for individuals experiencing hypoglycemia unawareness. While the procedure presents risks such as bleeding and rejection, it has demonstrated significant success rates in curing severe hypoglycemia and improving glucose control.
Teplizumab represents a revolutionary advancement in the treatment of DM1, which received approval in 2022 by the FDA as the first therapy to alter the course of the disease since the discovery of insulin.
Overall, the future of Type 1 Diabetic therapy appears promising with these innovative approaches. To effectively address the opportunities and challenges presented by novel modalities in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM), collaboration and concerted action among stakeholders across various domains are imperative. Healthcare professionals should prioritize comprehensive education and training programs to adeptly utilize emerging treatments and technologies. Collaboration among researchers, clinicians, industry partners, and patient advocacy groups is crucial to accelerate the development and evaluation of novel modalities. Policymakers should advocate for streamlined regulatory pathways to ensure timely approval and access to these treatments. Additionally, stakeholders should prioritize patient-centered care by involving patients and caregivers in decision-making processes. Adequate funding and resources are essential to support research and development efforts in this field, and fair pricing and reimbursement policies should be established to enhance affordability and accessibility. Robust surveillance systems are needed to monitor safety and efficacy post-market, and raising public awareness about the benefits of novel T1DM treatments is vital. Embracing digital health solutions can further improve treatment delivery and monitoring. By collectively addressing these opportunities and challenges, stakeholders can advance novel modalities in T1DM management and improve outcomes for individuals living with this condition. Continued clinical studies and technological advancements may lead to refinements in these treatments, potentially ushering in an era where Type 1 Diabetes can be effectively managed or even eradicated on a global scale.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.A. and M.A.P.; Methodology, R.A., M.A.P.; Validation, S.N.M, N.A.W, M.S.; Formal analysis, R.A., M.A.P.; Resources, All; Data curation, N.A.W., M,S.; Writing—original draft preparation, All.; Writing—review and editing, S.N.M, N.A.W, M.S .; Visualization, R.A., M.A.P.; Supervision, R.A., M.A.P; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

N.A.

Institutional Review Board Statement

N.A

Informed Consent Statement

N.A

Data Availability Statement

No new data was created.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. World health Organization(WHO). Diabetes fact sheet 2024. https://www.who.int/health-topics/diabetes#tab=tab_1.
  2. Pathak V, Pathak NM, O'Neill CL, Guduric-Fuchs J, Medina RJ. Therapies for Type 1 Diabetes: Current Scenario and Future Perspectives. Clin Med Insights Endocrinol Diabetes. 2019 May 3;12:1179551419844521. PMID: 31105434; PMCID: PMC6501476. [CrossRef]
  3. Lucier J, Weinstock RS. Type 1 Diabetes. [Updated 2023 Mar 3]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan-.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK507713/.
  4. Vija L, Farge D, Gautier JF, Vexiau P, Dumitrache C, Bourgarit A, Verrecchia F, Larghero J. Mesenchymal stem cells: Stem cell therapy perspectives for type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Metab. 2009 Apr;35(2):85-93. Epub 2009 Feb 20. PMID: 19230736. [CrossRef]
  5. Egro FM. Why is type 1 diabetes increasing? J Mol Endocrinol. 2013 Jul 12;51(1):R1-13. PMID: 23733895. [CrossRef]
  6. Størling J, Pociot F. Type 1 Diabetes Candidate Genes Linked to Pancreatic Islet Cell Inflammation and Beta-Cell Apoptosis. Genes (Basel). 2017 Feb 16;8(2):72. PMID: 28212332; PMCID: PMC5333061. [CrossRef]
  7. Nguyen C, Varney MD, Harrison LC, Morahan G. Definition of high-risk type 1 diabetes HLA-DR and HLA-DQ types using only three single nucleotide polymorphisms. Diabetes. 2013 Jun;62(6):2135-40. Epub 2013 Feb 1. PMID: 23378606; PMCID: PMC3661605. [CrossRef]
  8. Skugor M. Medical Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus. Cleve Clin J Med. 2017 Jul;84(7 Suppl 1):S57-S61. PMID: 28708483. [CrossRef]
  9. Wu H, Mahato RI. Mesenchymal stem cell-based therapy for type 1 diabetes. Discov Med. 2014 Mar;17(93):139-43. PMID: 24641956.
  10. Cobbold SP, Jayasuriya A, Nash A, Prospero TD, Waldmann H. Therapy with monoclonal antibodies by elimination of T-cell subsets in vivo. Nature. 1984 Dec 6-12;312(5994):548-51. PMID: 6150440. [CrossRef]
  11. Le Blanc K, Rasmusson I, Sundberg B, Götherström C, Hassan M, Uzunel M, Ringdén O. Treatment of severe acute graft-versus-host disease with third party haploidentical mesenchymal stem cells. Lancet. 2004 May 1;363(9419):1439-41. PMID: 15121408. [CrossRef]
  12. Ryan, J.M., Barry, F.P., Murphy, J.M. and Mahon, B.P., 2005. Mesenchymal stem cells avoid allogeneic rejection. Journal of inflammation, 2, pp.1-11.
  13. Wang, Y.; et al. Mesenchymal stem cells in immunoregulation. Immunology and Cell Biology 2014; 92(4), 323-331.
  14. Voltarelli, J. C.; et al. Autologous nonmyeloablative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes mellitus. JAMA 2007; 297(14), 1568-1576.
  15. Liu, L.N., Wang, G., Hendricks, K., Lee, K., Bohnlein, E., Junker, U. and Mosca, J.D., 2013. Comparison of drug and cell-based delivery: Engineered adult mesenchymal stem cells expressing soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor II prevent arthritis in mouse and rat animal models. Stem Cells Translational Medicine, 2(5), pp.362-375.
  16. Ezquer, F.E., Ezquer, M.E., Parrau, D.B., Carpio, D., Yañez, A.J. and Conget, P.A., 2008. Systemic administration of multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells reverts hyperglycemia and prevents nephropathy in type 1 diabetic mice. Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 14(6), pp.631-640.
  17. Chen, L.B., Jiang, X.B. and Yang, L., 2004. Differentiation of rat marrow mesenchymal stem cells into pancreatic islet beta-cells. World Journal of Gastroenterology: WJG, 10(20), p.3016.
  18. Karnieli, O., Izhar-Prato, Y., Bulvik, S. and Efrat, S., 2007. Generation of insulin-producing cells from human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells by genetic manipulation. Stem Cells, 25(11), pp.2837-2844.
  19. Li, Y., Zhang, R., Qiao, H., Zhang, H., Wang, Y., Yuan, H., Liu, Q., Liu, D., Chen, L. and Pei, X., 2007. Generation of insulin-producing cells from PDX-1 gene-modified human mesenchymal stem cells. Journal of Cellular Physiology, 211(1), pp.36-44.
  20. Blyszczuk, P., Czyz, J., Kania, G., Wagner, M., Roll, U., St-Onge, L. and Wobus, A.M., 2003. Expression of Pax4 in embryonic stem cells promotes differentiation of nestin-positive progenitor and insulin-producing cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(3), pp.998-1003.
  21. Limbert, C., Päth, G., Ebert, R., Rothhammer, V., Kassem, M., Jakob, F. and Seufert, J., 2011. PDX1-and NGN3-mediated in vitro reprogramming of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells into pancreatic endocrine lineages. Cytotherapy, 13(7), pp.802-813.
  22. Kroon, E., Martinson, L.A., Kadoya, K., Bang, A.G., Kelly, O.G., Eliazer, S., Young, H., Richardson, M., Smart, N.G., Cunningham, J. and Agulnick, A.D., 2008. Pancreatic endoderm derived from human embryonic stem cells generates glucose-responsive insulin-secreting cells in vivo. Nature Biotechnology, 26(4), pp.443-452.
  23. Bonner-Weir, S. and Weir, G.C., 2005. New sources of pancreatic β-cells. Nature Biotechnology, 23(7), pp.857-861.
  24. Timper, K., Seboek, D., Eberhardt, M., Linscheid, P., Christ-Crain, M., Keller, U., Müller, B. and Zulewski, H., 2006. Human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells differentiate into insulin, somatostatin, and glucagon expressing cells. Biochemical and biophysical research communications, 341(4), pp.1135-1140.
  25. Chao, K.C., Chao, K.F., Fu, Y.S. and Liu, S.H., 2008. Islet-like clusters derived from mesenchymal stem cells in Wharton's Jelly of the human umbilical cord for transplantation to control type 1 diabetes. PLoS ONE, 3(1), p.e1451.
  26. Gao, F., Wu, D.Q., Hu, Y.H., Jin, G.X., Li, G.D., Sun, T.W. and Li, F.J., 2008. In vitro cultivation of islet-like cell clusters from human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Translational Research, 151(6), pp.293-302.
  27. Aloysious, N. and Nair, P.D., 2014. Enhanced survival and function of islet-like clusters differentiated from adipose stem cells on a three-dimensional natural polymeric scaffold: An in vitro study. Tissue Engineering Part A, 20(9-10), pp.1508-1522.
  28. Xiong, J., Hu, H., Guo, R., Wang, H. and Jiang, H., 2021. Mesenchymal stem cell exosomes as a new strategy for the treatment of diabetes complications. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 12, p.646233.
  29. Guo, S., Perets, N., Betzer, O., Ben-Shaul, S., Sheinin, A., Michaelevski, I., Popovtzer, R., Offen, D. and Levenberg, S., 2019. Intranasal delivery of mesenchymal stem cell derived exosomes loaded with phosphatase and tensin homolog siRNA repairs complete spinal cord injury. ACS Nano, 13(9), pp.10015-10028.
  30. Shen, B., Liu, J., Zhang, F., Wang, Y., Qin, Y., Zhou, Z., Qiu, J. and Fan, Y., 2016. CCR2 positive exosome released by mesenchymal stem cells suppresses macrophage functions and alleviates ischemia/reperfusion-induced renal injury. Stem Cells International, 2016.
  31. Mahdipour, E., Salmasi, Z. and Sabeti, N., 2019. Potential of stem cell-derived exosomes to regenerate β islets through Pdx-1 dependent mechanism in a rat model of type 1 diabetes. Journal Of Cellular Physiology, 234(11), pp.20310-20321.
  32. Nojehdehi, S., Soudi, S., Hesampour, A., Rasouli, S., Soleimani, M. and Hashemi, S.M., 2018. Immunomodulatory effects of mesenchymal stem cell–derived exosomes on experimental type-1 autoimmune diabetes. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, 119(11), pp.9433-9443.
  33. Sabry, D., Marzouk, S., Zakaria, R., Ibrahim, H.A. and Samir, M., 2020. The effect of exosomes derived from mesenchymal stem cells in the treatment of induced type 1 diabetes mellitus in rats. Biotechnology Letters, 42, pp.1597-1610.
  34. Scheller, E.L. and Krebsbach, P.H., 2009. Gene therapy: Design and prospects for craniofacial regeneration. Journal of Dental Research, 88(7), pp.585-596.
  35. Lundstrom K. Viral Vectors in Gene Therapy: Where Do We Stand in 2023? Viruses. 2023 Mar 7;15(3):698. PMID: 36992407; PMCID: PMC10059137. [CrossRef]
  36. Kang H, Ga YJ, Kim SH, Cho YH, Kim JW, Kim C, Yeh JY. Small interfering RNA (siRNA)-based therapeutic applications against viruses: Principles, potential, and challenges. J Biomed Sci. 2023 Oct 16;30(1):88. PMID: 37845731; PMCID: PMC10577957. [CrossRef]
  37. Giannoukakis, N. and Trucco, M., 2005. Gene therapy for type 1 diabetes. American Journal of Therapeutics, 12(6), pp.512-528.
  38. Tarner, I.H., Slavin, A.J., McBride, J., Levicnik, A., Smith, R., Nolan, G.P., Contag, C.H. and Fathman, C.G., 2003. Treatment of autoimmune disease by adoptive cellular gene therapy. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 998(1), pp.512-519.
  39. Prud’Homme, G.J. and Chang, Y., 1999. Prevention of autoimmune diabetes by intramuscular gene therapy with a nonviral vector encoding an interferon-gamma receptor/IgG1 fusion protein. Gene Therapy, 6(5), pp.771-777.
  40. Condon, C., Watkins, S.C., Celluzzi, C.M., Thompson, K. and Falo Jr, L.D., 1996. DNA–based immunization by in vivo transfection of dendritic cells. Nature Medicine, 2(10), pp.1122-1128.
  41. Chatenoud, L., Salomon, B. and Bluestone, J.A., 2001. Suppressor T cells–they’re back and critical for regulation of autoimmunity!. Immunological Reviews, 182(1), pp.149-163.
  42. Shevach, E.M., McHugh, R.S., Piccirillo, C.A. and Thornton, A.M., 2001. Control of T-cell activation by CD4+ CD25+ suppressor T cells. Immunological Reviews, 182(1), pp.58-67.
  43. Honey, K., Benlagha, K., Beers, C., Forbush, K., Teyton, L., Kleijmeer, M.J., Rudensky, A.Y. and Bendelac, A., 2002. Thymocyte expression of cathepsin L is essential for NKT cell development. Nature Immunology, 3(11), pp.1069-1074.
  44. Zhang, L., Shannon, J., Sheldon, J., Teh, H.S., Mak, T.W. and Miller, R.G., 1994. Role of infused CD8+ cells in the induction of peripheral tolerance. Journal of immunology Baltimore, Md.: 1950), 152(5), pp.2222-2228.
  45. Ryan, E.A., Lakey, J.R., Rajotte, R.V., Korbutt, G.S., Kin, T., Imes, S., Rabinovitch, A., Elliott, J.F., Bigam, D., Kneteman, N.M. and Warnock, G.L., 2001. Clinical outcomes and insulin secretion after islet transplantation with the Edmonton protocol. Diabetes, 50(4), pp.710-719.
  46. Cheung, A.T., Dayanandan, B., Lewis, J.T., Korbutt, G.S., Rajotte, R.V., Bryer-Ash, M., Boylan, M.O., Wolfe, M.M. and Kieffer, T.J., 2000. Glucose-dependent insulin release from genetically engineered K cells. Science, 290(5498), pp.1959-1962.
  47. Beattie, G.M., Rubin, J.S., Mally, M.I., Otonkoski, T. and Hayek, A., 1996. Regulation of proliferation and differentiation of human fetal pancreatic islet cells by extracellular matrix, hepatocyte growth factor, and cell-cell contact. Diabetes, 45(9), pp.1223-1228.
  48. Lumelsky, N., Blondel, O., Laeng, P., Velasco, I., Ravin, R. and McKay, R., 2001. Differentiation of embryonic stem cells to insulin-secreting structures similar to pancreatic islets. Science, 292(5520), pp.1389-1394.
  49. McKay R. Stem cells--hype and hope. Nature. 2000 Jul 27;406(6794):361-4. PMID: 10935622. [CrossRef]
  50. Schwartz, R.E., Reyes, M., Koodie, L., Jiang, Y., Blackstad, M., Lund, T., Lenvik, T., Johnson, S., Hu, W.S. and Verfaillie, C.M., 2002. Multipotent adult progenitor cells from bone marrow differentiate into functional hepatocyte-like cells. The Journal of Clinical Investigation, 109(10), pp.1291-1302.
  51. Fleischer, N., Chen, C., Surana, M., Leiser, M., Rossetti, L., Pralong, W. and Efrat, S., 1998. Functional analysis of a conditionally transformed pancreatic beta-cell line. Diabetes, 47(9), pp.1419-1425.
  52. Shapiro, A. M. J., Pokrywczynska, M. and Ricordi, C. (2017) “Clinical ancreatic islet transplantation,” Nature Reviews. Endocrinology, 13(5), pp. 268–277. [CrossRef]
  53. Rickels, M. R. and Robertson, R. P. (2019) “Pancreatic islet transplantation in humans: Recent progress and future directions,” Endocrine Reviews, 40(2), pp. 631–668. [CrossRef]
  54. Fiorina, P. and Secchi, A. (2007) “Pancreatic islet cell transplant for treatment of diabetes,” Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics of North America, 36(4), pp. 999–1013; ix. [CrossRef]
  55. Cayabyab, F., Nih, L. R. and Yoshihara, E. (2021) “Advances in pancreatic islet transplantation sites for the treatment of diabetes,” Frontiers in Endocrinology, 12, p. 732431. [CrossRef]
  56. Zhou X, Xu Z, You Y, Yang W, Feng B, Yang Y, Li F, Chen J, Gao H. Subcutaneous device-free islet transplantation. Front Immunol. 2023 Oct 18;14:1287182. PMID: 37965322; PMCID: PMC10642112. [CrossRef]
  57. Ramos Eleanor L., Dayan Colin M., Chatenoud Lucienne, Sumnik Zdenek, Simmons Kimber M., Szypowska Agnieszka, Gitelman Stephen E., Knecht Laura A., Niemoeller Elisabeth, Tian Wei, & Herold Kevan C. (2023). Teplizumab and β-Cell Function in Newly Diagnosed Type 1 Diabetes. New England Journal of Medicine, 389(23), 2151–2161. [CrossRef]
  58. Nourelden AZ, Elshanbary AA, El-Sherif L, Benmelouka AY, Rohim HI, Helmy SK, Sayed MK, Ismail A, Ali AS, Ragab KM, Zaazouee MS. Safety and Efficacy of Teplizumab for Treatment of Type One Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Endocr Metab Immune Disord Drug Targets. 2021;21(10):1895-1904. PMID: 33302842. [CrossRef]
  59. Herold KC, Gitelman SE, Gottlieb PA, Knecht LA, Raymond R, Ramos EL. Teplizumab: A Disease-Modifying Therapy for Type 1 Diabetes That Preserves β-Cell Function. Diabetes Care. 2023 Oct 1;46(10):1848-1856. PMID: 37607392; PMCID: PMC10545553. [CrossRef]
  60. Sims EK, Bundy BN, Stier K, Serti E, Lim N, Long SA, Geyer SM, Moran A, Greenbaum CJ, Evans-Molina C, Herold KC; Type 1 Diabetes TrialNet Study Group. Teplizumab improves and stabilizes beta cell function in antibody-positive high-risk individuals. Sci Transl Med. 2021 Mar 3;13(583):eabc8980. PMID: 33658358; PMCID: PMC8610022. [CrossRef]
  61. Evans-Molina, C., & Oram, R. A. (2023). Teplizumab approval for type 1 diabetes in the USA. The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, 11(2), 76–77. [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.

Downloads

182

Views

95

Comments

0

Subscription

Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.

Email

Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated