1. Introduction
The photochemical isomerization of heterocyclic compounds has been the object of several studies in the past [
1,
2,
3,
4] and the rearrangements of heterocyclic compounds can offer relevant synthetic targets [
5]. We can consider, as an example of the type of problems we can find in this field, the photochemical reactivity of pyridine. The photochemical isomerization of pyridine in the excited state to form a Dewar structure has been postulated several years ago (
Scheme 1) [
6,
7,
8,
9,
10,
11,
12,
13,
14,
15,
16]. Transient spectroscopy showed that the decay from S1 and S2 states had a fast component (2.2 ps) attributable to the motion on the ππ* reaction path to form the isomer (an azaprefulvene isomer, see below) [
17].
The photochemical reactivity of pyridine is known from the first steps of photochemistry studies. In 1932 Freytag described the reaction of pyridine with water when it is irradiated in aqueous solution [
18,
19,
20]. The same reaction has been reconsidered several years ago [
21,
22].
Pyridine is able to form a complex in the presence of water and the spectroscopic properties of this complex has been studied [
23,
24,
25,
26,
27]. Experiments performed in a cryogenic matrix, showed the presence of Dewar pyridine in the reaction of pyridine with water [
28]. A very similar reaction has been observed irradiation the pyridine derivative in methanol [
29,
30].
The 2,4,6-trimethyl derivative gave also a pyrrole derivative [
30]. The irradiation of pyridine in cyclohexane gave 2- and 4-cyclohexylpyridine in 10% yield [
31]. Furthermore, pentakis(pentafluoroethyl)pyridine gave, if irradiated in perfluoropentane at > 270 nm, the Dewar isomer, that can be converted into the prismane derivative through irradiation at > 200 nm in almost quantitative yields [
32].
The irradiation of pyridine in the gas phase gave only decomposition products (hydrogen, methane, ethene, acetylene, propylene, allene, methylacetylene, isobutylene) [
33]. Gas phase irradiation of 2-picoline gave conflicting results. An article claims as main product of the reaction 4-picoline (together with 2,5-ludidine and pyridine) [
34], while another account showed that 2-picoline gave a mixture of 3- and 4-picoline with 5.1 10-4 and 4 10-5, respectively [
35]. Another study on gas phase photochemistry of dimethypyridine derivatives proposed a more complex scenario [
36]. The irradiation at 254 nm of 2,3-dimethylpyridine (2,3-lutidine) results in the formation of 2,6-dimethylpyridine, 3,4-dimethylpyridine, and 2,5-dimethylpyridine (
Scheme 2). However, when the reaction is performed in the presence of nitrogen, while the yields of 2,6-dimethylpyridine and 3,4-dimethylpyridine decreased, the yields of the third product increased. Furthermore, when the irradiation is performed at 290 nm, 2,5-dimethylpyridine was the only reaction product. The authors proposed that these reaction products derived from different pathways. The first two products derived from the S2 state through a mechanism involving electrocyclic ring closure to form an azaprefulvene isomer and sigmatropic shifts.
Furthermore, the formation of 2,5-dimethylpyridine occurred in the triplet state through the formation of a Dewar pyridine derivative followed by a sigmatropic shift of C-2 from C-3 to C-5.
The photochemical reactivity of 3,4,5-trideuteriopyridine is compatible with the formation of an azaprefulvene isomer [
37]. When a pyridine derivative is irradiated in methanol some isomerization products have been observed [
30]. The mechanism proposed to justify these results involve the formation of Dewar pyridines and prismane.
An aniline derivative was obtained as the main product after the irradiation of an acetonitrile pyridine derivative [
38]. Dewar pyridine was supposed to be involved in the reaction together with a [
3,
3] sigmatropic shift.
The analysis of the literature showed that several hypotheses have been proposed in order to justify the observed reactivity. However, some general observations can be made: the reaction occurs through the excited singlet state. The triplet state is not involved in the reaction. There is a lot of evidence related to the formation of Dewar pyridine. The NMR spectra of Dewar pyridine derivatives obtained performing the reaction at low temperature have been registered [
36]. Furthermore, spectroscopic data are in agreement with the formation of an azaprefulvene biradical in the photochemical reaction of pyridine in acetonitrile [
17]. CASSCF studies on the formation of Dewar pyridine in the photochemical isomerization of pyridine has been reported [
16], while a CASSCF study has been reported also for the formation of the azaprefulvene biradical intermediate [
17].
The above reported data clearly showed the presence of an evident confusion of the explanation of the observed photochemical behavior. For this reason, we started a research project devoted to find a lower chaotic description of the reactivity of this type of compounds. However, previous results in this field indicate the presence of a relatively complex frame: in the reaction of pyridinium salts with nucleophiles the observed reaction can be explained admitting the formation of a Dewar isomer [
39]; in the case of the reaction with nucleophiles of pyrilium salts, the formation of cyclopentene epoxide cation is favored [
40], while in the isomerization of 2,6-dimethylpyrazine, Dewar isomers or benvalene isomers can account for the reaction [
41]. Continuing our efforts in this field, we want to describe the results of our calculations on the isomerization of pyridazine
N-oxides.
3. Results and Discussion
The photochemical isomerization of pyridazine
N-oxide derivatives has been the object of some significant research papers [
47,
48,
49,
50,
51,
52,
53,
54]. The irradiation of 3,6-diphenylpyridazine
N-oxide (
1) gave 3-benzoyl-5-phenylpyrazole (
2) in 50% yield together with 6% of 2,5-diphenylfuran (
3) (
Scheme 3) [
53]. On the other hand, the irradiation of 3-phenylpyridazine
N-oxide (
4) gave 2-phenylfuran (
5) in 40-50% yields (
Scheme 3) [
52].
The mechanism proposed for these reactions required the formation of the intermediate
6 that allowed a ring opening reaction with the formation of a diazoketone
7. This intermediate had been identified by using flash photolysis experiments. The diazoketone
7 could allow the formation of the pyrazole, or, after the elimination of nitrogen, the formation of the furan derivatives (
Scheme 4) [
53].
We decided to test this hypothesis with the hope to find a reason for the different reactivity between 3,6-diphenyl and 3-phenylpyridazine N-oxide.
The calculations, performed at DFT/B3LYP/6-311G+(d,p) level of theory on Gaussian 09 allowed to obtain the result depicted in
Figure 1 for 3,6-diphenylpyridazine
N-oxide.
The first excited singlet state of 3,6-diphenylpyridzine
N-oxide was found at 347.59 nm. Attempts to identify the energy of the intermediate
6 failed. The formation of a chemical bond between the oxygen atom and the adjacent carbon atom allowed immediately the cleavage the pyridazine bond with the formation of the diazoketone
7 (
Figure 1).
This intermediate can be transformed to give the final products following two different pathways. The attack of nitrogen atom on the caron atom adjacent to the carbonyl group allowed the formation of the ring contraction product
8. This isomerization required the formation of a transition state (
TS1) at 1.07 eV (
Figure 2). The transition state is an early one, where the nitrogen atom is approaching to the double bond of
7, but the bond between the nitrogen atom and the carbon atom adjacent to the carbonyl group is not formed.
The compound
8 was not stable and a hydrogen shift allowed its transformation in the main product of the reaction, the pyrazole derivative
9 (
Figure 1). This isomerization can occur through the transition state
TS2, showing an energy of 1.03 eV (
Figure 3). The early transition state showed the hydrogen atom while it is migrating from the carbon atom to the nitrogen atom.
The second path showed by
7 to give the reaction product is the lost of nitrogen atom. The authors supposed the formation of an unstable intermediate that underwent the attack of the oxygen atom to give the final product, 2,5-diphenylfuran (
Figure 1). The calculations did not support this mechanism (
Figure 2). In fact, the intermediate
7 was converted directly into the furan derivative
10, through the formation of a transition state
TS3 showing an energy of 1.34 eV. The energy difference of 0.27 eV can account for the observed yields of the reaction products between
9 and
10. In fact, the proposed intermediate was the transition state
TS3 (
Figure 4).
The above reported results accounts to justify the observed reactivity, allowing to give a simple framework of the observed reactions. To confirm this result, this delineated scheme has to justify also the reactivity of 3-phenylpyridazine
N-oxide that was able to give only 2-phenylfuran. In this case, the reaction could be described, on the basis of the above reported calculations, considering the
Scheme 5.
The results of the calculations on the photoisomerization of 3-phenylpyridazine
N-oxide is summarized in the
Figure 5.
3-Phenylpyridazine
N-oxide showed an excited singlet state at 330 nm. The first excited singlet state can give the first isomerization reaction to give the diazo derivative
11. The isomerization reaction of
11 to give
12 did not occur. In fact, the calculations allowed to obtain a different reaction product, the compound
14 (
Scheme 6).
Compound
14 has not been reported in literature and, probably, decomposed. The only possible reaction was the loss of nitrogen from
11 to give 2-phenylfuran
13. The reaction occurred through the formation of the transition state
TS1, showing an energy of 0.87 eV (
Figure 6).