Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

An Overview of the Arguments in Literature, For and Against the Use of Green Hydrogen for the Production of Direct Reduced Iron

Version 1 : Received: 23 May 2024 / Approved: 23 May 2024 / Online: 23 May 2024 (16:45:11 CEST)

How to cite: Roos, G. An Overview of the Arguments in Literature, For and Against the Use of Green Hydrogen for the Production of Direct Reduced Iron. Preprints 2024, 2024051582. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202405.1582.v1 Roos, G. An Overview of the Arguments in Literature, For and Against the Use of Green Hydrogen for the Production of Direct Reduced Iron. Preprints 2024, 2024051582. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202405.1582.v1

Abstract

The global steel industry is a major contributor to greenhouse gas emissions, and the adoption of green hydrogen in Direct Reduced Iron (DRI) production has the potential to significantly reduce CO2 emissions and support climate targets. This review explores the environmental, economic, technological, and social implications of using green hydrogen in DRI processes. The findings suggest that green hydrogen can reduce emissions by up to 90% compared to traditional methods, enhance energy security, and stimulate local economic development. However, high initial costs, energy efficiency concerns, and social acceptance issues remain significant barriers. The review also highlights the importance of integrating carbon capture and storage technologies, addressing logistical challenges, and considering the geopolitical implications of a shift towards green hydrogen. Green hydrogen presents a promising solution for decarbonising the steel industry but continued research, investment in infrastructure, and strategic planning are essential to overcome the challenges and drive widespread adoption.

Keywords

Green hydrogen; Direct Reduced Iron (DRI); Decarbonisation; Steel industry; Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS); Renewable energy; Electrolysis; Energy efficiency; Geopolitical implications; Social acceptance

Subject

Business, Economics and Management, Business and Management

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.