Submitted:
09 May 2024
Posted:
09 May 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Background & Aims: Reports of a rise in childhood cancer incidence in Australia and globally prompted the investigation of cancer incidence and survival in South Australia (SA) and the Northern Territory (NT) over a 28-year period, with emphasis on Indigenous peoples.
Methods: This cross-sectional analysis of two prospective longitudinal databases, the SA and NT Cancer Registries (1990-2017), included all reported cases of childhood cancers. Poisson regression provided estimates of incidence rate ratios and survival was modelled using Cox proportional hazard models for children aged 0.05). With reference to the 1990-1999 era, overall survival improved in subsequent eras in SA (2000-2009: HR 0.53 [0.38-0.73]; 2010-2017: 0.44 [0.28-0.68]); however, remained unchanged in the NT (2000-2009: 0.78 [0.40-1.51]; 2010-2017: 0.50 [0.24-1.05]). In the NT, overall survival of Indigenous patients was significantly lower compared with the non-Indigenous cohort (3.42 [1.92-6.10]). While the survival of Indigenous children with cancer significantly improved in the last two eras (p0.05).
Conclusions: The incidence of childhood cancers has remained unchanged over 28-years in SA and the NT. Encouragingly, improved survival rates over time were observed in SA and amongst Indigenous children of the NT. Nevertheless, survival rates in Indigenous children remain lower than non-Indigenous children.
Keywords:
outcomes
; morbidity
; mortality
; children
; Indigenous
Introduction
In recent decades, there has been a concerning increase in global reports of cancers affecting children and young adults [1,2,3]. Recent interrogation of Australian data, derived from the South Australian (SA) and Northern Territory (NT) Cancer Registries (SACR and NTCR), revealed an increase in young-onset gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas in SA [4] and a higher-than-average incidence rate in the NT since 1990 [5]. Moreover, the overall incidence rate of childhood cancer in Australia increased by 34% between 1983 and 2015, rising by 1.2% yearly between 2005 and 2015, with an expected 7% rise by 2035 [6].
The underlying causes for early-onset carcinogenesis have largely remained speculative, implicating exposure to early antibiotics and alteration of gut microbiome, lifestyle factors including cigarette smoking, alcohol, physical inactivity and rising incidence of obesity, variations in mismatch repair genes and microsatellite instability [7,8,9,10,11]. Social determinants of health also influence cancer risk, resulting in significant health inequities between populations. This is particularly evident among worldwide Indigenous populations, attributed to the ongoing impacts of colonisation and marginalisation [12,13,14]. Cancer disproportionately impacts Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, herein respectfully referred to as Indigenous Australians, who are 40% more likely to die of cancer in comparison to non-Indigenous Australians [15].
It was hypothesised that the incidence of childhood cancers is increasing in SA and the NT. We aimed to determine the age and incidence of childhood cancers (leukemias and embryonal tumours) and characterise the trends in overall survival over a 28-year period in SA and the NT. Additionally, we aimed to gain insight into the trends and overall survival amongst Indigenous Australian children afflicted with cancer in the NT. The findings of the current study will support the ongoing monitoring of cancer outcomes for children in SA and NT, which can be leveraged to influence improved policy and clinical practice, particularly for NT Indigenous Australian children affected by cancer.
Methods
A retrospective analysis of longitudinal data, collected prospectively from 1 January 1990 to 31 December 2017, was undertaken. Data was acquired from both SACR and NTCR, focussing on all cases of lymphocytic leukemia, nephroblastoma, neuroblastoma, Ewing sarcoma, osteosarcoma, retinoblastoma, hepatoblastoma, rhabdomyosarcoma and medulloblastoma.
All cases of invasive cancer are notifiable via the Health Care (Reporting of Cancer) Regulations under the SA Health Care Act 2008 [16]; SACR has been collecting data on cancer incidence and mortality since 1977 and is managed by Wellbeing SA’s Epidemiology Branch (under the auspices of SA Health). Similarly, the NTCR, established in 1981 by the NT Department of Health and Families, captures all NT cancer diagnoses and cancer-related deaths in accordance with the NT Cancer (Registration) Regulations under the NT Cancer (Registration) Act 2011 [17].
Ethics approval was obtained from the SA Department for Health and Wellbeing Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC; Reference number 2021/HRE00174) and the HREC and Aboriginal Ethics Sub-Committee of the NT Department of Health and Menzies School of Health Research (HREC Reference Number 2021-4027). A waiver of consent was provided by both HRECs, considering only de-identified data were obtained.
Selection of Cases
Inclusion Criteria
Cases of SA and NT residents aged 19 years of age and younger with a pathologically-confirmed diagnosis of lymphocytic leukemia, nephroblastoma, neuroblastoma, Ewing sarcoma, osteosarcoma, retinoblastoma, hepatoblastoma, rhabdomyosarcoma and medulloblastoma were included. Histology codes included International Classification of Diseases (ICD) C64.9, C91.0, C91.01, C91.02, C92.0, C92.01, C92.02, C71.6, C74.90, C22.2, 9510/2, 9511/3, 9512/3, 9513/3, 9514/1, 9186/3, 9260/3, 8902/3. The study period was categorised into three time periods (eras 1990-1999, 2000-2009, 2010-2017) to reflect incidence and survival of cancers over time.
Statistical Analysis
All statistical analyses were conducted using R version 4.2.3 (R Core Team, 2023) and Stata version 16.1 (StataCorp, 2019). Patient characteristics were expressed as median and interquartile range (IQR) for skewed data. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to explore the significance of differences in patients’ age between two groups of patients. Proportions were presented as percentages of the respective denominator and were compared between groups using a standard Chi-square test for association with continuity correction, where appropriate.
The incidence rates (IR) were calculated by taking the total number of cases divided by the population at risk. Age-sex specific population data were extracted from 1990-2017 and divided by the respective average population. The 2011 population census data were used to calculate the incidence rates between Indigenous and non-Indigenous populations in the NT. The rates were presented per 100,000 persons over three time periods for age groups <5 years and ≥5 years, for each sex and cancer primary subtypes. A Poisson regression model was applied to examine the incidence rates between groups of the above characteristics. Estimates were calculated using the likelihood ratio method and expressed as incidence rate ratios (IRRs) from the Poisson regression model. Residual deviance was used to evaluate the model goodness of fit.
Survival was measured from the date of cancer diagnosis to the date of death or individuals were censored at date of loss to follow-up or census date; the census date was assigned on 31st December 2017. Five-year survival rates were calculated for each cancer subtype across state levels and Indigenous status. Survival was evaluated by examining standard Kaplan-Meier survival curves and patient cohorts were compared by the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards models were applied to examine survival outcomes. Age, sex, primary subtypes, and cohort era were used to explore the risk of death. The estimates were calculated using the likelihood ratio method and were expressed as hazard ratios (HRs), the lower the HR, the longer the survival. Proportional hazard assumption was tested by log-log plot of survival and Schoenfeld Residuals. A Harrell’s C-statistics was used to explore the predictive discrimination ability of the model. The two-sided test was performed for all analyses, 95% confidence intervals (CI) were reported, and the level of significance was set at α=0.05.
Results
Patient Demographics and Reported Cancers
A total of 895 patients across SA (N=753) and NT (N=142) were diagnosed with lymphocytic leukemia, nephroblastoma, neuroblastoma, Ewing sarcoma, osteosarcoma, retinoblastoma, hepatoblastoma, rhabdomyosarcoma or medulloblastoma between 1990 and 2017 (Table 1). The median ages for the combined SA and NT cohort, SA only and NT only cohorts were five (IQR 2-13), four (2-12) and seven years (2-16), respectively.
The overall IR was 193.04 (95%CI 180.60-206.12) per 100,000 residents across the combined cohort (SA and NT), 189.37 (176.09-203.39) in SA alone and the highest in the NT at 215.16 (181.23-253.60; Table 2), with no significant change over the three time periods. Importantly, a significantly higher incidence was noted in the <5 years group (SA and NT 379.02/100,000; SA 391.99/100,000; NT 309.97/100,000) compared with individuals aged ≥5 years (SA and NT 132.23/100,000, IRR 0.35, 95%CI 0.31-0.40, p<0.001; SA 124.73/100,000, IRR 0.32, 0.28-0.37, p<0.001; NT 179.42/100,000, IRR 0.58, 0.41-0.81, p<0.01; Table 2). The incidence was higher in males (208.92/100,000) compared with females (176.31/100,000) in the combined SA and NT cohort (IRR 1.19, 1.04-1.35, p<0.01) and NT cohort (male 175.91/100,000; female 175.91/100,000; IRR 1.43, 1.02-2.01, p<0.05). In SA, there was no significant difference in IRR (1.14, 0.99-1.32, p=0.07) based on sex (male 201.74/100,000; female 176.38/100,000; Table 2, Supplementary Figure 1).
Lymphocytic leukemia was the most reported cancer type across all locations (SA and NT 119.71/100,000; SA 121.47/100,000; NT 109.10/100,000; Table 2). It was noted to be significantly more common in <5-year-olds versus ≥5 years in SA (IRR 0.40, 95%CI 0.33-0.48; p<0.001) and the NT (0.50, 0.31-0.79, p<0.01; Supplementary Figure 2). In SA, overall survival of children diagnosed with lymphocytic leukemia significantly improved in the 2000-2009 and 2010-2017 eras, compared with 1990-1999 (p<0.001), whereas in the NT, survival significantly improved (p<0.01) only in the most recent era (2010-2017) compared with 1990-1999 (Supplementary Figure 3). Medulloblastoma was the least commonly reported cancer subtype (SA and NT 1.94/100,000; SA 1.76/100,000; NT 3.03/100,000). Each cancer subtype was largely consistent in incidence across the two locations; however, the incidence of rhabdomyosarcoma was greater in the NT (36.37/100,000) compared with combined SA and NT cohort (8.2/100,000) and SA alone (3.52/100,000, p<0.001; Table 2).
Non-Indigenous and Indigenous Patient Demographics and Reported Cancers in NT
In the NT, a total of 139 children, comprising 100 non-Indigenous and 39 Indigenous children, were diagnosed with cancer subtypes (Table 1). The overall IR for non-Indigenous children was 226.28 (95%CI 184.11-275.22) compared with 158.94 (113.02-217.28) for Indigenous children. The <5-year-olds had significantly greater incidence of childhood cancer compared with ≥5 years group in both non-Indigenous (IRR 0.66, 0.44-0.99, p=0.046) and Indigenous (0.43, 0.22-0.81, p<0.01) cohorts (Table 3). The incidence rates did not significantly vary by sex in non-Indigenous (p=0.06) and Indigenous cohorts (p>0.05). In the non-Indigenous cohort, the IRR significantly decreased from the 1990-1999 era (IR 278.32/100,000, 199.73-377.58) to the 2000-2009 era (162.92/100,000, 104.38-242.41; IRR 0.58, 0.35-0.97, p<0.05), with no significant change in 2010-2017 (237.59/100,000, 165.49-330.44, IRR 0.85, p>0.05; Table 3). Amongst Indigenous children, incidence rates remained statistically unchanged across eras (1990-1999: 110.04/100,000, 50.32-208.89; 2000-2009: 195.62/100,000, 111.82-317.68; 2010-2017, 171.17/100,000, 93.58-287.19, p>0.05; Table 3).
Lymphocytic leukemia remained the most reported cancer subtype in both non-Indigenous (101.83/100,000, 95%CI 74.27-136.25) and Indigenous (105.96/100,000, 69.22-155.26) children in the NT, with medulloblastoma representing the least reported cancer subtype (non-Indigenous 2.26/100,000, 0-12.61; Indigenous 4.08/100,000, 0-22.71; Table 3). The incidence of rhabdomyosarcoma was 52.04/100,000 (32.99-78.09) in the non-Indigenous cohort, with no cases reported in Indigenous peoples during the study period (Table 3).
Survival by Time Trends and Subtype
The 5-year survival rates in SA (77%, 95%CI 74-80) and the NT (62%, 95%CI 51-71) were similar. By cancer subtypes in SA, lymphocytic leukemias, nephroblastoma, hepatoblastoma and rhabdomyosarcoma revealed greater 5-year survivals compared with other cancer types, with similar survivals observed in the NT (Table 4).
Overall survival was significantly lower in the ≥5-year group versus the <5-year reference group in SA (HR 2.00, 1.47-2.72, p<0.001; Table 5), whereas in the NT, survival did not differ significantly between age groups (HR 1.57, 0.84-2.94, p>0.05). There was no difference in overall survival between males and females in both SA (HR 0.98, 0.73-1.32, p>0.05) and the NT (HR 0.93, 0.52-1.66, p>0.05). With reference to the 1990-1999 era, overall survival improved in subsequent eras in SA (2000-2009: HR 0.53, 0.38-0.73, p<0.001; 2010-2017: HR 0.44, 0.28-0.68, p<0.001); however, remained unchanged in the NT (2000-2009: HR 0.78, 0.40-1.51; 2010-2017: HR 0.50, 0.24-1.05, p>0.05; Table 5).
Survival by Time Trends and Subtype in Non-Indigenous Compared with Indigenous Children in the NT
Among non-Indigenous children in the NT, the 5-year survival was 79% (95%CI 69-85), while for the Indigenous cohort, it was notably lower at 38% (95%CI 22-53; Table 6). Survivals exceeded 70% for all cancer subtypes in the non-Indigenous group, except for Ewing Sarcoma and osteosarcoma. In contrast, all cancer subtypes in the Indigenous Australian cohort had survivals below 70% (Table 6). In the NT, overall survival of Indigenous Australian children was lower compared with the non-Indigenous cohort (HR 3.42, 1.92-6.10, p<0.001). No difference in survival was noted between <5 and ≥5-year-old non-Indigenous and Indigenous Australian children (p>0.05). While the survival of Indigenous Australian children with childhood cancers has significantly improved in the last two eras (2000-2009: HR 0.35, 0.13-0.93, p=0.04; 2010-2007: HR 0.29, 01.0-0.83, p=0.02; Table 7) compared to the 1990-1999 era, no significant change was noted amongst non-Indigenous children (p>0.05). Overall, no difference in survival was observed between male and female children, irrespective of their Indigenous status (p>0.05).
Discussion
This study investigated the incidence and survival of childhood cancers in SA and the NT between 1990 and 2017, with further insights into cancer trends amongst Indigenous and non-Indigenous children in the NT.
The incidence of childhood cancers in SA and the NT has remained largely unchanged over 28-years. Additionally, incidence rates were lower in children aged ≥5-years compared with their younger counterparts; this effect was less pronounced in the NT. According to data derived from the International Classification of Childhood Cancer 3rd Edition, the rates of cancer from 2011 to 2015 in Australian children aged zero to 14 were slightly higher (16.3/100,000) than for the period between 2006 and 2010 (15.1/100,000) [18]. Furthermore, whilst rates increased for all age groups, the largest increase was for children aged five to nine (2006–2010: 10.3/100,000; 2011–2015: 12.3/100,000) [18]. On a global scale, an increase in the world age-standardised rate for all cancer incidence in children aged zero to 14 years from the 1980s to the period between 2001 and 2010 was noted; an increase observed in all regions, except sub-Saharan Africa [19].
It was postulated that increased global rates of childhood cancer since the 1980s may be attributed to improved diagnostic strategies, the ongoing development of cancer registration and more effective ascertainment techniques [18,19]. However, it is the perinatal period [20] that may help uncover the factors underlying young-onset carcinogenesis. Barreto and Pandol postulated the PELICan hypothesis for young-onset carcinogenesis; insults in utero trigger epigenetic and hormonal modifications to aid foetal adaptation and survival, with subsequent exposure to similar stressors in early childhood prompting further epigenetic modifications, resulting in premature activation of driver mutations [1,2]. The absence of a change in incidence of childhood cancers over time, especially in SA in which a significant increase in young-onset cancers was documented over the same period [4], is pertinent.
Consistent with global data [19], lymphocytic leukemia was the most reported childhood cancer across both SA and the NT, with lowest reports of medulloblastoma in both regions. The incidence of rhabdomyosarcoma was significantly greater in the NT compared with SA, with no significant variation in other cancer subtypes across locations. Male sex was associated with higher rates of childhood cancer incidence compared with females in the NT, with no significant sex differences in SA. Population-based studies from the United States have indicated a higher incidence rate of childhood cancer in males in general and by tumour type [21]. Differences in gene expression from autosomes or the X chromosome, rather than birthweight, may underlie sex differences in childhood tumour risk [21].
Overall survival from childhood cancers has significantly improved in SA, though not in the NT. A retrospective, population-based cohort study, extracting case information from the Australian Childhood Cancer Registry between 1983 to 2016 was undertaken [22]. Data indicated that Australian children diagnosed with cancer between 1983 and 1994 were almost twice as likely to die within five years compared with children diagnosed between 2007 and 2016, with corresponding relative survival rates of 73% and 86%, respectively [22]. These gains in survival translated to an estimated 1500 avoided deaths between 1995 and 2016, representing greater than one-third of all expected deaths within five years of diagnosis [22]. Akin to the current study outcomes, there were no differences in survival by sex for childhood cancers [22]. On a global scale, the five-year survival reports for all childhood cancers combined in Australia (86%: 2007-2016) was comparative with the United States (85%: 2011-2017) [23] and England (84%: 2011-2015) [24]; however, these evaluations must be interpreted with caution as they do not account for differences in the range of cancers analysed between countries. Considering there has been minimal change in the distribution of stage at diagnosis for Australian children with cancer, except retinoblastoma and hepatoblastoma, improved survival over the past two decades reflects the implementation of more effective therapies derived from large clinical trials [25].
Indigenous Australians represent 3.3% of the total Australian population, but 26.3% of the NT population [26]. Indigenous Australians experience barriers in accessing cancer health care stemming from geographic remoteness of residence, low socio-economic status, racism in health care services and a lack of culturally appropriate and coordinated cancer care [27,28,29]. Corresponding disparities in cancer health outcomes for Indigenous Australians have persisted over decades, prompting a strong focus of achieving equity in cancer outcomes for Indigenous Australians within the new Australian Cancer Plan and the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cancer Plan [30,31].
Previous studies have included data on NT Indigenous Australian childhood cancer outcomes utilising sources such as the national Australian Childhood Cancer Registry and hospital records reviews [32,33,34]. However, no study to date has focussed on cancer subtypes and outcomes among NT Indigenous Australian children as a separate sub-cohort. The current study identified a temporal reduction in the incidence of childhood cancer in non-Indigenous children, whilst cancer incidence remained unchanged in Indigenous Australian children. Consistent with the previous literature, overall survival of Indigenous Australian children in the NT was lower compared with the non-Indigenous cohort [32,33,34]. However, overall survival for Indigenous Australian children in the NT improved from 1990 to 2017, indicating that Indigenous Australian children in the NT may be beginning to benefit from advancements in clinical cancer care made over the past three decades.
A major strength of the current study is the collection of high-quality data from the SACR and NTCR over 28 years, with strict inclusion criteria, representing a rigorous process to gain invaluable insight into childhood cancer trends in SA and the NT. However, further study is needed to collect detailed socio-economic data and data on perinatal lifestyle choices to understand the underlying factors that drive early carcinogenesis. Moreover, limited sample size of the Indigenous cohort with a lack of these data from SA may have influenced statistical power, rending limitations to in-depth analyses, disease subtype-specific analyses and interpretations of data. Improved Indigenous identification within health data across all Australian jurisdictions is needed to ensure visibility of Indigenous Australians within cancer registries. Increased engagement between cancer registries, Indigenous Australian communities and Indigenous health experts are needed to ensure these data sources can be best utilised to influence clinical practice and policy to close the gap for Indigenous Australians affected by cancer.
Conclusions
Overall, this study demonstrates that the incidence of childhood cancers has remained largely unchanged across 28 years in SA and the NT. Improved survival rates over time were observed in SA and amongst Indigenous Australian children of the NT. Nevertheless, cancer survival rates for Indigenous Australian children remain lower than non-Indigenous Australian children, indicating a continuing need for new interventions to ensure equity in cancer outcomes for this population.
Author Contributions
Design of study, literature search, data interpretation, drafting of manuscript, final approvalSU: Data analysis and interpretation, critical revision of manuscript, final approval AC: literature search, critical revision of manuscript, final approval GS, OP, DR, BS, RM, SP: Critical revision of manuscript, final approvalCTR: Design of study, critical revision of manuscript, final approvalSGB: Conceptualisation and design of study, data interpretation, critical revision of manuscript, final approval.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to acknowledge and pay our respects to the Traditional Owners and Custodians of the lands on which this research was undertaken. We acknowledge that Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples constitute many diverse communities, language groups and kinships throughout Australia; when presenting data, we will be respectfully using the term Indigenous Australians. We would like to acknowledge Dr Shu Qin Li, Northern Territory Cancer Registrar, as well as Prof. Katina D’Onise and Dr Rosie Meng, South Australian Cancer Registry for their support of this project.
Research Support as Follows
SP support - US NIH: R01 AA024464, P01 DK098108, P50 AA0119991, U01 DK108314, US DoD: W81XWH1910888. CTR support - National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC) Investigator Grant (GNT1174971) and a Matthew Flinders Professorial Fellowship from Flinders University, South Australia. RM support - Beat Cancer Project funded by Cancer Council SA and SA Health. SGB support - Flinders Foundation Grant: 49358025, NHMRC Ideas Grant: 2021009, Pankind 21.R7.INV.CB.UOSA.6.2 supported by funds from the CUREator scheme via Brandon BioCatalyst
References
- Barreto, S. G. We Asked the Experts: Providing the Road Map to Uncovering the Pathophysiology of Young-Onset Cancer to Guide Treatment and Preventive Strategies. World J Surg 2020, 44, no. 10, 3212-13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barreto, S. G., and S. J. Pandol. “Young-Onset Carcinogenesis - the Potential Impact of Perinatal and Early Life Metabolic Influences on the Epigenome.”. Front Oncol 2021, 11, 653289. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- di Martino, E., L. Smith, S. H. Bradley, S. Hemphill, J. Wright, C. Renzi, R. Bergin, J. Emery, and R. D. Neal. “Incidence Trends for Twelve Cancers in Younger Adults-a Rapid Review.”. Br J Cancer 2022, 126, no. 10, 1374-86.
- Schell, D., S. Ullah, M. E. Brooke-Smith, P. Hollington, M. Yeow, C. S. Karapetis, D. I. Watson, S. J. Pandol, C. T. Roberts, and S. G. Barreto. “Gastrointestinal Adenocarcinoma Incidence and Survival Trends in South Australia, 1990-2017.”. Cancers (Basel) 2022, 14, no. 2. [CrossRef]
- Shepherdson, M., S. Leemaqz, G. Singh, C. Ryder, S. Ullah, K. Canuto, J. P. Young, T. J. Price, R. A. McKinnon, S. J. Pandol, C. T. Roberts, and S. G. Barreto. “Young-Onset Gastrointestinal Adenocarcinoma Incidence and Survival Trends in the Northern Territory, Australia, with Emphasis on Indigenous Peoples.”. Cancers (Basel) 2022, 14, no. 12. [CrossRef]
- Youlden, D. R., P. D. Baade, A. C. Green, P. C. Valery, A. S. Moore, and J. F. Aitken. “The Incidence of Childhood Cancer in Australia, 1983-2015, and Projections to 2035.”. Med J Aust 2020, 212, no. 3, 113-20.
- Barreto, S. G. Young-Onset Rectal Cancer Patients: In Need of Answers. Future Oncol 2019, 15, no. 10, 1053-55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vuik, F. E., S. A. Nieuwenburg, M. Bardou, I. Lansdorp-Vogelaar, M. Dinis-Ribeiro, M. J. Bento, V. Zadnik, M. Pellise, L. Esteban, M. F. Kaminski, S. Suchanek, O. Ngo, O. Majek, M. Leja, E. J. Kuipers, and M. C. Spaander. “Increasing Incidence of Colorectal Cancer in Young Adults in Europe over the Last 25 Years.”. Gut 2019, 68, no. 10, 1820-26.
- Farrington, S. M., A. J. McKinley, A. D. Carothers, C. Cunningham, V. J. Bubb, L. Sharp, A. H. Wyllie, and M. G. Dunlop. “Evidence for an Age-Related Influence of Microsatellite Instability on Colorectal Cancer Survival.”. Int J Cancer 2002, 98, no. 6, 844-50.
- French, S. A., M. Story, and R. W. Jeffery. “Environmental Influences on Eating and Physical Activity.”. Annu Rev Public Health 2001, 22, 309-35.
- Rea, D., G. Coppola, G. Palma, A. Barbieri, A. Luciano, P. Del Prete, S. Rossetti, M. Berretta, G. Facchini, S. Perdona, M. C. Turco, and C. Arra. “Microbiota Effects on Cancer: From Risks to Therapies.”. Oncotarget 2018, 9, no. 25, 17915-27.
- “Australian Institute of Health and Welfare 2011. The Health and Welfare of Australia’s Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People, an Overview 2011.” Cat. no. IHW 42. Canberra: AIHW (2011).
- Devi, S. Native American Health Left out in the Cold. Lancet 2011, 377, no. 9776, 1481-2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- “Australian Institute of Health and Welfare 2016. Australian Burden of Disease Study: Impact and Causes of Illness and Death in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People 2011.” Australian Burden of Disease Study series no. 6. Cat. no. BOD 7. Canberra: AIHW (2016).
- “Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Cancer in Aboriginal & Torres Strait Islander People of Australia. Canberra: Aihw 2018. Cancer in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples of Australia: An Overview, Summary - Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (Aihw.Gov.Au).” viewed 15 April 2023 (2018).
- “South Australian Legislation. Health Care Regulations 2008 under the Health Care Act 2008.”.
- “Northern Territory Legislation. Cancer (Registration) Act.”.
- “Australian Institute of Health and Welfare 2020. Australia’s Children.”. Cat. no. CWS 69. Canberra: AIHW (2020).
- Steliarova-Foucher, E., M. Colombet, L. A. G. Ries, F. Moreno, A. Dolya, F. Bray, P. Hesseling, H. Y. Shin, C. A. Stiller, and Iicc- contributors. “International Incidence of Childhood Cancer, 2001-10: A Population-Based Registry Study.”. Lancet Oncol 2017, 18, no. 6, 719-31.
- Barker, D. J. “The Origins of the Developmental Origins Theory. ” J Intern Med 2007, 261, no. 5, 412-7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Williams, L. A., M. Richardson, R. D. Kehm, C. C. McLaughlin, B. A. Mueller, E. J. Chow, and L. G. Spector. “The Association between Sex and Most Childhood Cancers Is Not Mediated by Birthweight.”. Cancer Epidemiol 2018, 57, 7–12. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Youlden, D. R., P. D. Baade, A. S. Moore, J. D. Pole, P. C. Valery, and J. F. Aitken. “Childhood Cancer Survival and Avoided Deaths in Australia, 1983-2016.”. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2023, 37, no. 1, 81–91.
- Howlader, N., A.M. Noone, M. Krapcho, D. Miller, A. Brest, M. Yu, J. Ruhl, Z. Tatalovich, A. Mariotto, D.R. Lewis, H.S. Chen, E.J. Feuer, and K.A. Cronin. “Seer Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2018.” (2020).
- Irvine, L., and C. Stiller. “Childhood Cancer Statistics, England: Annual Report 2018.” Public Health England (2018).
- Youlden, D. R., P. D. Baade, A. L. Frazier, S. Gupta, N. G. Gottardo, A. S. Moore, and J. F. Aitken. “Temporal Changes in Childhood Cancer Incidence and Survival by Stage at Diagnosis in Australia, 2000-2017.” Acta Oncol 2023, 1-9.
- “Australian Bureau of Statistics. Census of Population and Housing: Characteristics of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians, 2016.” Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia (2019).
- Anderson, K., A. Diaz, D. R. Parikh, and G. Garvey. “Accessibility of Cancer Treatment Services for Indigenous Australians in the Northern Territory: Perspectives of Patients and Care Providers.”. BMC Health Serv Res 2021, 21, no. 1, 95.
- Jessop, S., S. Hill, K. Bicanin, T. Day, J. Turner, M. O’Connell, R. Highfold, and T. Revesz. “Aboriginal Children with Cancer: The Patient and Healthcare Worker Perspective.”. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2024, 71, no. 1, e30747.
- Reilly, R., J. Micklem, P. Yerrell, D. Banham, K. Morey, J. Stajic, M. Eckert, M. Lawrence, H. B. Stewart, A. Brown, D. A. D. Investigators other Can, and D. A. D. Aboriginal Community Reference Group the Can. “Aboriginal Experiences of Cancer and Care Coordination: Lessons from the Cancer Data and Aboriginal Disparities (Candad) Narratives.”. Health Expect 2018, 21, no. 5, 927-36.
- “National Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisation. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cancer Plan. Canberra: Naccho, 2023. Cancer - Naccho.” viewed 4 January 2024 (2023).
- “Cancer Australia. Australian Cancer Plan. New South Wales: Cancer Australia 2023. Welcome to the Australian Cancer Plan.” viewed 1 December 2023 (2023).
- Jessop, S., S. Ruhayel, R. Sutton, D. R. Youlden, G. Pearson, C. Lu, S. Milne, M. J. Henderson, J. F. Aitken, R. S. Kotecha, and T. Revesz. “Are Outcomes for Childhood Leukaemia in Australia Influenced by Geographical Remoteness and Indigenous Race?”. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2021, 68, no. 4, e28945.
- Valery, P. C., D. R. Youlden, P. D. Baade, L. J. Ward, A. C. Green, and J. F. Aitken. “Cancer Survival in Indigenous and Non-Indigenous Australian Children: What Is the Difference?”. Cancer Causes Control 2013, 24, no. 12, 2099-106.
- Youlden, D. R., P. D. Baade, C. A. McBride, J. D. Pole, A. S. Moore, P. C. Valery, A. Young, and J. F. Aitken. “Changes in Cancer Incidence and Survival among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children in Australia, 1997-2016.”. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2022, 69, no. 4, e29492.
Table 1.
Children’s characteristics, Indigenous status and era for SA and NT.
| SA & NT | SA | NT | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N=895 | N=753 | N=142 | ||||
| N | % | N | % | N | % | |
| Age, years, median (IQR) | 5 | (2-13) | 4 | (2-12) | 7 | (2-16) |
| Age, years | ||||||
| <5 | 433 | 48.4 | 377 | 50.1 | 56 | 39.4 |
| ≥5 | 462 | 51.6 | 376 | 49.9 | 86 | 60.6 |
| Sex | ||||||
| Female | 398 | 44.5 | 342 | 45.4 | 56 | 39.4 |
| Male | 497 | 55.5 | 411 | 54.6 | 86 | 60.6 |
| Indigenous status | ||||||
| Non-Indigenous | 100 | 11.2 | - | - | 100 | 70.4 |
| Indigenous | 39 | 4.4 | - | - | 39 | 27.5 |
| Missing | 756 | 84.5 | 753 | 100 | 3 | 2.1 |
| Era | ||||||
| 1990-1999 | 300 | 33.5 | 250 | 33.2 | 50 | 35.2 |
| 2000-2009 | 312 | 34.9 | 270 | 35.9 | 42 | 29.6 |
| 2010-2017 | 283 | 31.6 | 233 | 30.9 | 50 | 35.2 |
| Cancer subtype | ||||||
| Lymphocytic leukemias | 555 | 62.0 | 483 | 64.1 | 72 | 50.7 |
| Nephroblastoma | 84 | 9.4 | 70 | 9.3 | 14 | 9.9 |
| Neuroblastoma | 62 | 6.9 | 55 | 7.3 | 7 | 4.9 |
| Ewing Sarcoma | 48 | 5.4 | 40 | 5.3 | 8 | 5.6 |
| Osteosarcoma | 39 | 4.4 | 33 | 4.4 | 6 | 4.2 |
| Retinoblastoma | 37 | 4.1 | 33 | 4.4 | 4 | 2.8 |
| Hepatoblastoma | 23 | 2.6 | 18 | 2.4 | 5 | 3.5 |
| Rhabdomyosarcoma | 38 | 4.2 | 14 | 1.9 | 24 | 16.9 |
| Medulloblastoma | 9 | 1.0 | 7 | 0.9 | 2 | 1.4 |
Note: Number and percentages are reported unless stated otherwise; IQR Interquartile range Indigenous data are only available for NT.
Table 2.
Incidence rates (IR), incidence rate ratios (IRR) and 95% CI (Poisson regression model) for age, sex, era and cancer subtypes between SA and NT.
Table 2.
Incidence rates (IR), incidence rate ratios (IRR) and 95% CI (Poisson regression model) for age, sex, era and cancer subtypes between SA and NT.
| SA & NT | SA | NT | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N=895 | N=753 | N = 142 | |||||||
| *IR (95% CI) | IRR (95% CI) | P-Value | *IR (95% CI) | IRR (95% CI) | P-Value | *IR (95% CI) | IRR (95% CI) | P-Value | |
| Overall | 193.04 (180.60-206.12) | 189.37 (176.09-203.39) | 215.16 (181.23-253.60) | ||||||
| Age (years) | |||||||||
| < 5 | 379.02 (344.15-416.45) | Reference | - | 391.99 (353.41-433.62) | Reference | 309.97 (234.15-402.52) | Reference | ||
| ≥5 | 132.23 (120.45-144.86) | 0.35 (0.31-0.40) | <0.001 | 124.73 (112.44-138.00) | 0.32 (0.28-0.37) | <0.001 | 179.42 (143.52-221.59) | 0.58 (0.41-0.81) | <0.01 |
| Sex | |||||||||
| Female | 176.31 (159.41-194.51) | Reference | - | 176.38 (158.18-196.10) | Reference | - | 175.91 (132.88-228.43) | Reference | - |
| Male | 208.92 (190.95-228.12) | 1.19 (1.04-1.35) | 0.01 | 201.74 (182.70-222.22) | 1.14 (0.99-1.32) | 0.07 | 251.74 (201.36-310.90) | 1.43 (1.02-2.01) | 0.04 |
| Era | |||||||||
| 1990-1999 | 181.67 (161.70-203.44) | Reference | - | 175.12 (154.08-198.23) | Reference | - | 223.50 (165.89-294.66) | Reference | - |
| 2000-2009 | 190.55 (169.99-212.91) | 1.06 (0.91-1.25) | 0.44 | 193.17 (170.82-217.64) | 1.12 (0.94-1.33) | 0.19 | 175.27 (126.32-236.91) | 0.78 (0.52-1.18) | 0.25 |
| 2010-2017 | 210.00 (186.24-235.94) | 1.15 (0.98-1.35) | 0.09 | 202.43 (177.27-230.16) | 1.15 (0.96-1.37) | 0.13 | 254.28 (188.73-335.24) | 1.14 (0.77-1.68) | 0.52 |
| Cancer subtype | |||||||||
| Lymphocytic leukemias | 119.71 (109.95-130.09) | 121.47 (110.88-132.80) | - | - | 109.10 (85.36-137.39) | - | 0.43 | ||
| Nephroblastoma | 18.12 (14.45-22.43) | 17.60 (13.72-22.24) | - | - | 21.21 (11.60 (35.59) | - | 0.63 | ||
| Neuroblastoma | 13.37 (10.25-17.14) | 13.83 (10.42-18.00) | 10.61 (4.26-21.85) | 0.63 | |||||
| Ewing Sarcoma | 10.35 (7.63-13.73) | 10.06 (7.19-13.70) | - | - | 12.12 (5.23-23.88) | - | 0.78 | ||
| Osteosarcoma | 8.41 (5.98-11.50) | 8.30 (5.71-11.67) | - | - | 9.09 (3.34-19.79) | - | >0.9 | ||
| Retinoblastoma | 7.98 (5.62-11.00) | 8.30 (5.71-11.67) | 6.06 (1.65-15.52) | 0.72 | |||||
| Hepatoblastoma | 4.96 (3.14-7.44) | 4.53 (2.68-7.15) | 7.58 (2.46-17.68) | 0.46 | |||||
| Rhabdomyosarcoma | 8.20 (5.80-11.25 | 3.52 (1.92-5.91) | 36.37 (2.33-54.11) | <0.001 | |||||
| Medulloblastoma | 1.94 (0.89-3.69 | 1.76 (0.71-3.63) | 3.03 (0-10.95) | 0.83 | |||||
*IR is incidence per 100,000 residents. IRRs were not reported for cancer subtypes. P values for cancer subtype are based on Chi-square test and differentiated incidenece rates between SA and NT.
Table 3.
Incidence rates (IR), incidence rate ratios (IRR) and 95% CI (Poisson regression model) for age, sex, era and cancer subtypes between Indigenous and non-Indigenous children in NT.
Table 3.
Incidence rates (IR), incidence rate ratios (IRR) and 95% CI (Poisson regression model) for age, sex, era and cancer subtypes between Indigenous and non-Indigenous children in NT.
| Non-Indigenous | Indigenous | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N = 100 | N = 39 | |||||
| *IR (95% CI) | IRR (95% CI) | P-Value | *IR (95% CI) | IRR (95% CI) | P-Value | |
| Overall | 226.28 (184.11-275.22) | 158.94 (113.02-217.28) | ||||
| Age (years) | - | - | ||||
| <5 | 299.13 (210.62-412.32) | Reference | - | 277.64 (161.74-444.53) | Reference | - |
| ≥5 | 197.96 (152.12-253.28) | 0.66 (0.44-0.99) | 0.046 | 119.47 (74.87-180.89) | 0.43 (0.22-0.81) | <0.01 |
| Sex | ||||||
| Female | 181.15 (128.19-248.64) | Reference | - | 156.19 (153.30-159.11) | Reference | - |
| Male | 267.06 (204.75-342.36) | 1.47 (0.98-2.21) | 0.06 | 242.33 (238.51-246.21) | 1.09 (0.58-2.06) | 0.77 |
| Era | ||||||
| 1990-1999 | 278.32 (199.73-377.58) | Reference | - | 110.04 (50.32-208.89) | Reference | - |
| 2000-2009 | 162.92 (104.38-242.41) | 0.58 (0.35-0.97) | 0.04 | 195.62 (111.82-317.68) | 1.78 (0.79-4.02) | 0.17 |
| 2010-2017 | 237.59 (165.49-330.44) | 0.85 (0.54-1.34) | 0.49 | 171.17 (93.58-287.19) | 1.56 (0.67-3.59) | 0.30 |
| Cancer subtype | ||||||
| Lymphocytic leukemias | 101.83 (74.27-136.25) | - | - | 105.96 (69.22-155.26) | - | - |
| Nephroblastoma | 24.89 (12.43-44.54) | - | - | 12.23 (2.52-35.73) | - | - |
| Neuroblastoma | 9.05 (2.47-23.17) | - | - | 12.23 (2.52-35.73) | - | - |
| Ewing Sarcoma | 13.58 (4.98-29.55) | - | - | 4.08 (0-22.71) | - | - |
| Osteosarcoma | 6.79 (1.40-19.84) | - | - | 12.23 (2.52-35.73) | - | - |
| Retinoblastoma | 9.05 (2.47-23.17) | - | - | - | - | - |
| Hepatoblastoma | 6.79 (1.40-19.84) | - | - | 8.15 (0-29.44) | - | - |
| Rhabdomyosarcoma | 52.04 (32.99-78.09) | - | - | - | - | |
| Medulloblastoma | 2.26 (0-12.61) | - | - | 4.08 (0-22.71) | - | - |
*IR is incidence per 100,000 residents. 2011 census population was used for incidence rates. IRRs were not reported for cancer subtypes.
Table 4.
5-year survivals for primary subtypes of cancer between SA and NT.
| Cancer subtypes | SA & NT | SA | NT |
|---|---|---|---|
| N=895 | N=753 | N=142 | |
| Proportion (95% CI) | Proportion (95% CI) | ||
| Overall | 75% (72-78) | 77% (74-80) | 62% (51-71) |
| Lymphocytic leukemias | 78% (74-82) | 82% (78-85) | 62% (49-72) |
| Nephroblastoma | 86% (75-93) | 89% (79-95) | 86% (54-96) |
| Neuroblastoma | 53% (38-66) | 59% (43-71) | 54% (13-83) |
| Ewing Sarcoma | 54% (38-67) | 55% (38-69) | 50% (15-77) |
| Osteosarcoma | 54% (37-69) | 62% (42-76) | 33% (5-68) |
| Retinoblastoma | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Hepatoblastoma | 82% (53-94) | 89% (61-97) | 80% (20-97) |
| Rhabdomyosarcoma | 77% (55-89) | 69% (37-87) | 91% (70-98) |
| Medulloblastoma | 60% (20-85) | 63% (14-89) | 50% (1-91) |
Table 5.
Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% CI (Cox Proportional hazards model) for age, sex and era for SA and NT.
Table 5.
Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% CI (Cox Proportional hazards model) for age, sex and era for SA and NT.
| All | SA | NT | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N=895 | N=753 | N=142 | ||||
| HR (95% CI) | P Value | HR (95% CI) | P Value | HR (95% CI) | P Value | |
| Age (years) | 1.07 (1.05-1.09) | <0.001 | 1.08 (1.05-1.10) | <0.001 | 1.03 (0.98-1.08) | 0.22 |
| Age (years) | ||||||
| <5 | Reference | - | Reference | - | Reference | |
| ≥5 | 1.87 (1.40-2.51) | <0.001 | 2.00 (1.47-2.72) | <0.001 | 1.57 (0.84-2.94) | 0.16 |
| Sex | ||||||
| Female | Reference | - | Reference | - | Reference | - |
| Male | 1.03 (0.78-1.36) | 0.82 | 0.98 (0.73-1.32) | 0.90 | 0.93 (0.52-1.66) | 0.79 |
| Indigenous status | ||||||
| Non-Indigenous | - | - | - | - | Reference | |
| Indigenous | - | - | - | - | 3.42 (1.92-6.10) | <0.001 |
| Era | ||||||
| 1990-1999 | Reference | - | Reference | - | Reference | - |
| 2000-2009 | 0.36 (0.27-0.50) | <0.001 | 0.53 (0.38-0.73) | <0.001 | 0.78 (0.40-1.51) | 0.46 |
| 2010-2017 | 0.31 (0.31-0.44) | <0.001 | 0.44 (0.28-0.68) | <0.001 | 0.50 (0.24-1.05) | 0.07 |
Note: Data on Indigenous peoples are only available for NT.
Table 6.
5-year survivals for primary subtypes of cancer between Indigenous and Non-Indigenous peoples in NT.
Table 6.
5-year survivals for primary subtypes of cancer between Indigenous and Non-Indigenous peoples in NT.
| Cancer subtypes | Non-Indigenous | Indigenous |
|---|---|---|
| N=100 | N=39 | |
| Proportion (95% CI) | Proportion (95% CI) | |
| Overall | 79% (69-85) | 38% (22-53) |
| Lymphocytic leukemias | 70% (54-82) | 45% (25-63) |
| Nephroblastoma | 91% (51-99) | 67% (5-95) |
| Neuroblastoma | 100 | - |
| Ewing Sarcoma | 50% (11-80) | - |
| Osteosarcoma | 33% (1-77) | 33% (1-77) |
| Retinoblastoma | 100 | - |
| Hepatoblastoma | 100 | 50% (1-91) |
| Rhabdomyosarcoma | 91% (69-97) | - |
| Medulloblastoma | 100 | - |
Table 7.
Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% CI (Cox Proportional hazards model) for age, sex and era between Indigenous and non-Indigenous children in NT.
Table 7.
Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% CI (Cox Proportional hazards model) for age, sex and era between Indigenous and non-Indigenous children in NT.
| Non-Indigenous | Indigenous | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N=100 | N=39 | |||
| HR (95% CI) | P Value | HR (95% CI) | P Value | |
| Age (years) | 1.02 (0.97-1.09) | 0.42 | 1.06 (0.99-1.13) | 0.08 |
| Age (years) | ||||
| <5 | Reference | - | Reference | - |
| ≥5 | 1.38 (0.57-3.32) | 0.48 | 2.34 (0.96-5.70) | 0.06 |
| Sex | ||||
| Female | Reference | - | Reference | - |
| Male | 1.17 (0.50-2.74) | 0.72 | 1.06 (0.47-2.41) | 0.89 |
| Era | ||||
| 1990-1999 | Reference | - | Reference | - |
| 2000-2009 | 0.74 (0.0.28-1.93) | 0.54 | 0.35 (0.13-0.93) | 0.04 |
| 2010-2017 | 0.47 (0.0.17-1.33) | 0.17 | 0.29 (0.10-0.83) | 0.02 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
