Submitted:
10 April 2024
Posted:
10 April 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
1.1. Definition of AI Agents
1.2. Historical Context and Evolution of AI Agents
1.3. Types of AI Agents
1.4. AI Agents and Their Roles
1.5. Transition of AI from Supportive to Collaborative Roles
2. AI Agents Capabilities
3. AI Agents Applications
3.1. AI Agents in Healthcare
3.1.1. Diagnostic Assistance and Patient Monitoring
3.1.2. Drug Discovery and Personalized Medicine
3.1.3. Administrative Automation and Patient Data Management
3.2. AI Agents in Business
3.2.1. Customer Service Automation
3.2.2. Predictive Analytics for Market Trends and Consumer Behavior
3.2.3. Automation of Repetitive Tasks and Process Optimization
3.3. AI Agents in Education
3.3.1. Personalized Learning and Adaptive Educational Platforms
3.3.2. Automating Administrative Tasks and Grading
3.3.3. Enhancing Research through Data Analysis and Simulation
4. Integration of AI Agents in the Workplace
4.1. Strategies for Integrating AI into Various Workflows
4.2. Human-AI Collaboration Models
5. Challenges and Limitations
5.1. Technical Challenges in AI Development and Integration
5.2. Addressing Biases and Ethical Concerns
5.3. Impact on Employment and Workforce Dynamics
6. Developing AI Agents: A Tutorial and Framework
6.1. Process for Developing AI Agents
6.2. Key Considerations in Design and Development
- Defining Goals and Objectives: The behavior and operational parameters of an AI agent are shaped by a clearly defined set of goals and objectives [49].
- Data Handling: Data handling procedures are implemented to maintain the accuracy and integrity of the data utilized for training and testing. This involves preprocessing the data to remove inaccuracies and ensuring the security and privacy of the data [50].
- Algorithm Selection: The choice of the most suitable machine-learning algorithm is based on the specific requirements of the task. Considerations include the algorithm’s scalability, interpretability, computational efficiency, and the complexity of the model [48].
- Ethical Considerations: Ethical aspects, including fairness, transparency, accountability, and the broader societal impacts, are integral to the development of the AI agent.
- Legal Compliance: The deployment of AI technologies must adhere to all relevant laws and regulations, with particular attention to standards concerning data protection and privacy [51].
6.3. Technical Models
6.4. Frameworks and Tools for AI Agent Development
- Tensor Flow: Developed by Google, this comprehensive open-source library is specifically engineered for neural network training and the development of machine learning models, offering robust scalability and parallel computing advantages [53].
- PyTorch: Created by Meta AI Research, PyTorch is acclaimed for its dynamic computational graph and intuitive design, making it a preferred choice for researchers and developers working on cutting-edge machine learning applications [54].
- Karas: This user-friendly high-level API, designed to operate with TensorFlow, Microsoft Cognitive Toolkit, and Theano, streamlines the creation of complex neural networks with its modular and composable approach [55].
- Scikit-learn: A versatile Python library, Scikit-learn is well-suited for classical machine learning algorithms and is widely used for predictive data analysis, offering a rich selection of tools for statistical modeling [56].
- Open AI Gym: This toolkit presents a diverse array of environments for benchmarking and training AI agents, with a focus on facilitating the development of reinforcement learning algorithms through a standardized interface [57].
- Microsoft Cognitive Toolbox (CNTK): This deep learning framework from Microsoft is recognized for its efficiency and performance in training deep learning models, particularly when handling complex, high-dimensional data sets [58].
- Unity ML-Agents: Leveraging the Unity game engine, this plugin allows for the creation of rich, interactive environments where AI agents can be trained using reinforcement learning in complex, real-time scenarios [59].
6.5. Best Practices and Guidelines for Testing and Deployment
7. Future Prospects for AI Agents
7.1. Emerging Trends in AI Agents
- Generative AI: This trend focuses on the creation of new, original content by AI agents, whether it be text, images, or even code [60], that is indistinguishable from human-generated content [61]. Such AI agents are pushing the boundaries in creative industries and automating content generation processes.
- Edge AI: Involves deploying AI agents on local devices, enabling them to process data and make decisions on the spot without relying on cloud-based systems. This reduces latency, increases efficiency, and is particularly transformative in areas requiring immediate data processing, like autonomous vehicles.
- Federated Learning: A collaborative form of machine learning where AI agents learn from decentralized data. This preserves user privacy since data does not need to be shared with a central server, which is crucial for AI agents that handle sensitive information.
- AI Ethics: This emerging trend ensures that AI agents operate within ethical boundaries. It involves embedding moral decision-making capabilities into AI systems and ensuring that they act in ways that are considered fair and just by human standards.
- Quantum AI: It investigates the application of quantum computing to AI, which could dramatically increase the processing power of AI agents. This has the potential to solve complex problems much more quickly than current AI systems, leading to significant breakthroughs in fields like drug discovery and logistics.
7.2. Future Roles of AI Agents
- Healthcare: AI agents in healthcare can revolutionize patient care by providing continuous monitoring, aiding in complex diagnostics, and tailoring treatment plans to individual patient needs, thereby elevating the standard of care and patient outcomes.
- Transportation: In transportation, AI agents may contribute to safety and efficiency by enhancing predictive capabilities in self-driving vehicles, improving traffic management systems, and facilitating the development of smart infrastructure.
- Entertainment: AI agents can redefine entertainment, offering deeply personalized content, aiding in creative processes, and powering recommendation systems that cater to individual preferences, thus changing how audiences engage with media.
- Retail: In the retail sector, AI agents can streamline customer interactions, offer customized shopping experiences, and optimize the entire supply chain, from inventory management to delivery logistics.
- Manufacturing: AI agents in manufacturing can optimize production workflows, anticipate maintenance needs to prevent downtime, and consistently ensure quality control, driving forward the era of smart factories.
- Education: By automating administrative tasks like grading, providing tailored educational content, and adapting tutoring methods, AI agents in education can enable more personalized learning experiences and operational efficiency.
- Finance: AI agents may enhance the finance industry by offering sophisticated risk assessment tools, detecting fraudulent activities with greater accuracy, and analyzing market trends to inform investment strategies.
- Agriculture: In agriculture, AI agents can be instrumental in identifying pests and diseases, monitoring crop health, and implementing precision farming techniques, leading to increased yields and sustainable farming practices.
7.3. AI-Human Collaboration and Artificial General Intelligence (AGI)
8. Ethical and Societal Implications
8.1. Ethical Considerations in Deploying AI Agents
8.2. Societal Impact of Widespread AI Integration
8.3. Proposals for Equitable and Ethical AI
9. Conclusion
Ethical Approval
Acknowledgments
Competing Interests
References
- S. Franklin, “Autonomous agents as embodied AI,” Cybern. Syst., vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 499–520, 1997. [CrossRef]
- E. Alonso, “AI and agents: State of the art,” AI Mag., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 25–25, 2002.
- A. Lior, “AI entities as AI agents: Artificial intelligence liability and the AI respondeat superior analogy,” Mitchell Hamline Rev, vol. 46, p. 1043, 2019.
- H. C. Siu et al., “Evaluation of human-ai teams for learned and rule-based agents in hanabi,” Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., vol. 34, pp. 16183–16195, 2021.
- P. Ponnusamy, A. Ghias, Y. Yi, B. Yao, C. Guo, and R. Sarikaya, “Feedback-based self-learning in large-scale conversational ai agents,” AI Mag., vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 43–56, 2022. [CrossRef]
- J. Insa-Cabrera, D. L. Dowe, S. Espana-Cubillo, M. V. Hernández-Lloreda, and J. Hernández-Orallo, “Comparing humans and AI agents,” in Artificial general intelligence: 4th international conference, AGI 2011, mountain view, CA, USA, august 3-6, 2011. Proceedings 4, Springer, 2011, pp. 122–132.
- J. Williams, S. M. Fiore, and F. Jentsch, “Supporting artificial social intelligence with theory of mind,” Front. Artif. Intell., vol. 5, p. 750763, 2022. [CrossRef]
- D. L. Poole and A. K. Mackworth, Artificial Intelligence: foundations of computational agents. Cambridge University Press, 2010.
- B. Hayes-Roth, “Agents on stage: Advancing the state of the art of AI,” IJCAI 1, pp. 967–971, 1995.
- W. J. Teahan, Artificial Intelligence–Agents and environments. BookBoon, 2010.
- V. M. Petrović, “Artificial intelligence and virtual worlds–toward human-level AI agents,” IEEE Access Pract. Innov. Open Solut., vol. 6, pp. 39976–39988, 2018. [CrossRef]
- I. Nicenboim et al., “More-than-human design and AI: in conversation with agents,” in Companion publication of the 2020 ACM designing interactive systems conference, 2020, pp. 397–400.
- A. Vetrò, A. Santangelo, E. Beretta, and J. C. De Martin, “AI: from rational agents to socially responsible agents,” Digit. Policy Regul. Gov., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 291–304, 2019. [CrossRef]
- E. Dunaj, “8 use cases of AI agents in workflow automation.” [Online]. Available: https://rightinformation.com/blog/8-use-cases-of-ai-agents-in-workflow-automation/.
- I. Umarov and M. Mozgovoy, “Believable and effective AI agents in virtual worlds: Current state and future perspectives,” Int. J. Gaming Comput.-Mediat. Simul. IJGCMS, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 37–59, 2012.
- N. Jeenings and M. Wooldridge, “Applications of intelligent agents. Agent technology, foundations,” Appl. Mark. Springer, 1998.
- J. Kim and I. Im, “Anthropomorphic response: Understanding interactions between humans and artificial intelligence agents,” Comput. Hum. Behav., vol. 139, p. 107512, 2023. [CrossRef]
- X. Luo, M. S. Qin, Z. Fang, and Z. Qu, “Artificial intelligence coaches for sales agents: Caveats and solutions,” J. Mark., vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 14–32, 2021. [CrossRef]
- R. Noothigattu et al., “Teaching AI agents ethical values using reinforcement learning and policy orchestration,” IBM J. Res. Dev., vol. 63, no. 4/5, pp. 2–1, 2019.
- U. Shakir, “From ChatGPT to Gemini: how AI is rewriting the internet.” Mar. 18, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.theverge.com/23610427/chatbots-chatgpt-new-bing-google-bard-conversational-ai.
- N. R. Mannuru et al., “Artificial intelligence in developing countries: The impact of generative artificial intelligence (AI) technologies for development,” Inf. Dev., p. 02666669231200628, 2023. [CrossRef]
- N. Chmait, Y.-F. Li, D. L. Dowe, and D. G. Green, “A dynamic intelligence test framework for evaluating AI agents,” in Proceedings of 1st international workshop on evaluating general-purpose AI (EGPAI 2016), a workshop held in conjunction with the european conference on artificial intelligence (ECAI 2016), 2016.
- N. Muscettola, P. P. Nayak, B. Pell, and B. C. Williams, “Remote agent: To boldly go where no AI system has gone before,” Artif. Intell., vol. 103, no. 1–2, pp. 5–47, 1998. [CrossRef]
- E. André, T. Rist, and J. Muller, “Employing AI methods to control the behavior of animated interface agents,” Appl. Artif. Intell., vol. 13, no. 4–5, pp. 415–448, 1999. [CrossRef]
- F. M. Calisto, C. Santiago, N. Nunes, and J. C. Nascimento, “BreastScreening-AI: Evaluating medical intelligent agents for human-AI interactions,” Artif. Intell. Med., vol. 127, p. 102285, 2022.
- M. Milne-Ives et al., “The effectiveness of artificial intelligence conversational agents in health care: systematic review,” J. Med. Internet Res., vol. 22, no. 10, p. e20346, 2020. [CrossRef]
- S. Chandra, A. Shirish, and S. C. Srivastava, “To be or not to be… human? Theorizing the role of human-like competencies in conversational artificial intelligence agents,” J. Manag. Inf. Syst., vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 969–1005, 2022. [CrossRef]
- E. Han, D. Yin, and H. Zhang, “Bots with feelings: Should AI agents express positive emotion in customer service?,” Inf. Syst. Res., vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 1296–1311, 2023. [CrossRef]
- J. Peters, “Amazon is building an AI-powered ‘conversational experience’ for search.” The Verge, May 15, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.theverge.com/.
- G. B. Roba and P. Maric, “AI in customer relationship management,” in Developments in information and knowledge management systems for business applications: Volume 7, Springer, 2023, pp. 469–487.
- D. C. Gkikas and P. K. Theodoridis, “AI in consumer behavior,” Adv. Artif. Intell.-Based Technol. Sel. Pap. Honour Profr. Nikolaos G Bourbakis—Vol 1, pp. 147–176, 2022.
- M. Shrivastava, Learning salesforce einstein. Packt Publishing Ltd., 2017.
- M. Spring, J. Faulconbridge, and A. Sarwar, “How information technology automates and augments processes: Insights from Artificial-Intelligence-based systems in professional service operations,” J. Oper. Manag., vol. 68, no. 6–7, pp. 592–618, 2022. [CrossRef]
- P. F. Verschure and P. Althaus, “A real-world rational agent: unifying old and new AI,” Cogn. Sci., vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 561–590, 2003.
- H. Min, “Artificial intelligence in supply chain management: theory and applications,” Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 13–39, 2010. [CrossRef]
- A. Aldoseri, K. Al-Khalifa, and A. Hamouda, “A roadmap for integrating automation with process optimization for AI-powered digital transformation,” 2023.
- M.-H. Huang and R. T. Rust, “Engaged to a robot? The role of AI in service,” J. Serv. Res., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 30–41, 2021. [CrossRef]
- R. W. Maule, “Cognitive maps, AI agents and personalized virtual environments in Internet learning experiences,” Internet Res., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 347–358, 1998. [CrossRef]
- S. Shahriar, J. Ramesh, M. Towheed, T. Ameen, A. Sagahyroon, and A. Al-Ali, “Narrative integrated career exploration platform,” in Frontiers in education, Frontiers, 2022, p. 798950. [CrossRef]
- H. Chalupsky et al., “Electric Elves: Agent technology for supporting human organizations,” AI Mag., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 11–11, 2002.
- L. Chen, P. Chen, and Z. Lin, “Artificial intelligence in education: A review,” IEEE Access Pract. Innov. Open Solut., vol. 8, pp. 75264–75278, 2020. [CrossRef]
- J. Bryson, W. Lowe, and L. A. Stein, “Hypothesis testing for complex agents,” NIST Spec. Publ. SP, pp. 233–240, 2001.
- G. Maragno, L. Tangi, L. Gastaldi, and M. Benedetti, “AI as an organizational agent to nurture: effectively introducing chatbots in public entities,” Public Manag. Rev., vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 2135–2165, 2023. [CrossRef]
- B. Baggio and N. Omana, “AI and the agile workplace,” J. Syst. Cybern. Inform., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 84–91, 2019.
- P. Hemmer, M. Westphal, M. Schemmer, S. Vetter, M. Vössing, and G. Satzger, “Human-AI collaboration: The effect of AI delegation on human task performance and task satisfaction,” in Proceedings of the 28th international conference on intelligent user interfaces, 2023, pp. 453–463.
- Y. Duan, J. S. Edwards, and Y. K. Dwivedi, “Artificial intelligence for decision making in the era of Big Data–evolution, challenges and research agenda,” Int. J. Inf. Manag., vol. 48, pp. 63–71, 2019.
- S. Shahriar, S. Allana, M. H. Fard, and R. Dara, “A survey of privacy risks and mitigation strategies in the Artificial intelligence life cycle,” IEEE Access Pract. Innov. Open Solut., 2023. [CrossRef]
- P. Linardatos, V. Papastefanopoulos, and S. Kotsiantis, “Explainable ai: A review of machine learning interpretability methods,” Entropy Int. Interdiscip. J. Entropy Inf. Stud., vol. 23, no. 1, p. 18, 2020. [CrossRef]
- C. Castelfranchi, “Modelling social action for AI agents,” Artif. Intell., vol. 103, no. 1–2, pp. 157–182, 1998. [CrossRef]
- Y. Chen and P. Esmaeilzadeh, “Generative AI in medical practice: In-depth exploration of privacy and security challenges,” J. Med. Internet Res., vol. 26, p. e53008, 2024. [CrossRef]
- E. Mokhtarian, “The bot legal code: developing a legally compliant artificial intelligence,” Vand J Ent Tech L, vol. 21, p. 145, 2018.
- L. Wang et al., “A survey on large language model based autonomous agents,” Front. Comput. Sci., vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 1–26, 2024. [CrossRef]
- M. Abadi et al., “TensorFlow: Large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous systems.” Mountain View, CA: Tensorflow, 2015.
- A. Paszke et al., “Pytorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library,” Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., vol. 32, 2019.
- F. Chollet, Deep learning with python. Simon and Schuster, 2021.
- F. Pedregosa et al., “Scikit-learn: Machine learning in python,” J. Mach. Learn. Res., vol. 12, pp. 2825–2830, 2011.
- G. Brockman et al., “OpenAI gym.” 2016.
- W. Meints, Deep Learning with Microsoft Cognitive Toolkit Quick Start Guide: A practical guide to building neural networks using Microsoft’s open source deep learning framework. Packt Publishing Ltd., 2019.
- A. Juliani et al., “Unity: A general platform for intelligent agents,” ArXiv Prepr. ArXiv180902627, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1809.02627.pdf.
- K. Hayawi, S. Shahriar, and S. S. Mathew, “The imitation game: Detecting human and AI-generated texts in the era of ChatGPT and BARD,” J. Inf. Sci., p. 01655515241227531, 2024. [CrossRef]
- A. Bozkurt, “Generative artificial intelligence (AI) powered conversational educational agents: The inevitable paradigm shift,” Asian J. Distance Educ., vol. 18, no. 1, 2023.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).