Submitted:
09 April 2024
Posted:
10 April 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Related Works
2.1. Smithsonian Digital Volunteers: Transcription Center
2.1.1. How to transcribe
- a collection of instructions on how to become part of the Smithsonian world as a volunteer or as a follower on social networks;
- a central section dedicated to projects: from selecting a project via a drop-down menu to start browsing the Smithsonian website to links to discover new projects;
- a collection of the latest events within the transcription system such as revisions and transcribed pages with the nickname in plain text and the reference via a specific link to the documents involved.
2.1.2. The Community Engagement
2.2. Europeana Transcribathon
2.2.1. How to Transcribe
2.2.2. The Community Engagement
2.2.3. The Community Engagement
3. The University Museum System at UniGe (SMA-UniGe)
3.1. Methodology & Goals

3.2. The Target
- “Curious” user: the curious user has the possibility to browse, transcribe, review, earn experience points and badges and manage his dashboard independently via favorite topics selected during registration or elaborated based on his search preferences.
- “PCTO” user: the profile is reserved for students who have undertaken the Transversal Skills and Orientation Path and it is linked directly to the young user’s school email address. This type of profile has a personalized user experience to allow the student to complete the tasks required by the PCTO activity. In fact, the student must complete some tasks shown in his dashboard previously selected by the tutor professor who will see the work done once it is finished. Depending on the amount of time expected from the PCTO activity, the state of progress - and therefore the time spent active on the platform - will be considered based on the level reached within the game system. Once the PCTO period has ended, the student will be able to request, via a specific button in the account settings, to change it to a “Curious” user.
- “Expert” user: as soon as the user reaches level 20, the account is upgraded to “Expert” status. The “Expert” user has gained the trust of the community and, therefore, can review a transcript and mark it as "complete" without the intervention of a moderator.
3.3. The Environment
- The two transcription modes and the community button.
- Suggestions.
- Documents to which a contribution has already been made that are still pending completion.
4. Proposed Gamification Strategies
5. Conclusions and Future Works
References
- Reiser, L.; Harper, L.; Freeling, M.; Han, B.; Luan, S. FAIR: A call to make published data more findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable. Molecular plant 2018, 11, 1105–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ignat, T.; Ayris, P. Built to last! Embedding open science principles and practice into European universities. Insights: the UKSG journal 2021, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Memon, J.; Sami, M.; Khan, R.A.; Uddin, M. Handwritten optical character recognition (OCR): A comprehensive systematic literature review (SLR). IEEE Access 2020, 8, 142642–142668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bonney, R.; Phillips, T.B.; Ballard, H.L.; Enck, J.W. Can citizen science enhance public understanding of science? Public understanding of science 2016, 25, 2–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Davies, R. Crowdsourcing in cultural heritage. Europeana-Digital Heritage Research Lab 2020.
- Estellés-Arolas, E.; González-Ladrón-de Guevara, F. Towards an integrated crowdsourcing definition. Journal of Information science 2012, 38, 189–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vasconcelos, L.; Zahn, J.; Trevisan, D.; Viterbo, J. Engagement by Design Cards: A tool to involve designers and non-experts in the design of crowdsourcing initiatives. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 2024, 182, 103166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, Y.L.; Ding, N.D. Competitive gamification in crowdsourcing-based contextual-aware recommender systems. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 2023, 103083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Morschheuser, B.; Hamari, J.; Koivisto, J.; Maedche, A. Gamified crowdsourcing: Conceptualization, literature review, and future agenda. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 2017, 106, 26–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schreiber, G. Knowledge acquisition and the web. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 2013, 71, 206–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leon, S.M. Build, analyse, and generalise: community transcription of the papers of the war department and the development of scripto. Crowdsourcing our cultural heritage 2014, 88–112. [Google Scholar]
- Ferriter, M. Growing to a Community of Volunpeers: Communication & Discovery. Smithsonian Institution Archives 2014, 8, 191. [Google Scholar]
- Gunther, A.; Schall, M.; Wang, C.h. The creation and evolution of the Transcription Center, Smithsonian Institution’s digital volunteer platform. Collections 2016, 12, 87–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Europeana. Our Mission. Europeana Pro 2022. Last accessed: Jan 17, 2024.
- Di Giorgio, S. Culturaitalia, the Italian national content aggregator in Europeana. Procedia Computer Science 2014, 38, 40–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Macrì, E.; Cristofaro, C.L. The digitalisation of cultural heritage for sustainable development: The impact of Europeana. Cultural Initiatives for Sustainable Development: Management, Participation and Entrepreneurship in the Cultural and Creative Sector 2021, pp. 373–400.
- Morschheuser, B.; Hamari, J.; Maedche, A. Cooperation or competition – When do people contribute more? A field experiment on gamification of crowdsourcing. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 2019, 127, 7–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Woods, D. I Was a Human CAPTCHA Solver. F5.com 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Werbach, K.; Hunter, D. For the Win: How Game Thinking can Revolutionize your Business; Wharton School Press, 2012.
- Iacono, S.; Coccoli, M.; Zolezzi, D.; Vercelli, G. Gamification di un video-corso sulle competenze informatiche di base: da Gli Irrinunciabili a Star Words. Teach Different! Proceedings della Multiconferenza EMEMITALIA2015. Genova University Press, 2015, pp. 275–278.
- Coccoli, M.; Iacono, S.; Vercelli, G. Applying gamification techniques to enhance effectiveness of video-lessons. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society 2015, 11, 73–84. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, K.W. Effectiveness of gamification and selection of appropriate teaching methods of creativity: Students’ perspectives. Heliyon 2023, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hunicke, R.; LeBlanc, M.; Zubek, R. ; others. MDA: A formal approach to game design and game research. Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop on Challenges in Game AI. San Jose, CA, 2004, Vol. 4, p. 1722.
- Seaborn, K.; Fels, D.I. Gamification in theory and action: A survey. International Journal of Human-computer studies 2015, 74, 14–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bartle, R. Hearts, clubs, diamonds, spades: Players who suit MUDs. Journal of MUD research 1996, 1. [Google Scholar]
- Woodward, E.; Woodward, M. Expected Value and the Wheel of Fortune Game. The Mathematics Teacher 1994, 87, 13–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kalbach, J. “I’m feeling lucky”: The role of emotions in seeking information on the Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2006, 57, 813–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bandura, A. Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational psychologist 1993, 28, 117–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamari, J. Do badges increase user activity? A field experiment on the effects of gamification. Computers in human behavior 2017, 71, 469–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Legaki, N.Z.; Xi, N.; Hamari, J.; Karpouzis, K.; Assimakopoulos, V. The effect of challenge-based gamification on learning: An experiment in the context of statistics education. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 2020, 144, 102496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Coppola, F. Il rapporto aureo, le sue potenze e i numeri di Fibonacci. Scientia doi 2014, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mekler, E.D.; Brühlmann, F.; Opwis, K.; Tuch, A.N. Do points, levels and leaderboards harm intrinsic motivation? An empirical analysis of common gamification elements. Proceedings of the First International Conference on gameful design, research, and applications, 2013, pp. 66–73.
- Lee, Y.; Kim, M.; Koo, J. The impact of social interaction and team member exchange on sport event volunteer management. Sport Management Review 2016, 19, 550–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cohen, P.R.; Levesque, H.J. Teamwork. Nous 1991, 25, 487–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Landers, R.N.; Bauer, K.N.; Callan, R.C. Gamification of task performance with leaderboards: A goal setting experiment. Computers in Human Behavior 2017, 71, 508–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vercelli, G.V.; Iacono, S.; Vallarino, M.; Zolezzi, D. Puzzle Battle 2.0: A Revisited Serious Game in VR During Pandemic’s Period. Games and Learning Alliance: 10th International Conference, GALA 2021, La Spezia, Italy, December 1–2, 2021, Proceedings 10. Springer, 2021, pp. 252–257.
- Vargas-Murillo, A.R.; Pari-Bedoya, I.N.M.d.l.A.; Guevara-Soto, F.d.J. Virtual gamification strategies and their impact on legal education experiences: a systematic review. Proceedings of the 2023 8th International Conference on Distance Education and Learning, 2023, pp. 85–90.
- Rodríguez, I.; Puig, A.; Tellols, D.; Samsó, K. Evaluating the effect of gamification on the deployment of digital cultural probes for children. International journal of Human-Computer studies 2020, 137, 102395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Featherstone, M.; Habgood, J. UniCraft: Exploring the impact of asynchronous multiplayer game elements in gamification. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 2019, 127, 150–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rowicka, M.; Postek, S. Who likes to learn new things? How Gamification User Types and Satisfaction but not the frustration of basic psychological needs explain the preference for learning new things. Acta Psychologica 2023, 236, 103925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Thomas, N.J.; Baral, R.; Crocco, O.S.; Mohanan, S. A framework for gamification in the metaverse era: How designers envision gameful experience. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2023, 193, 122544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]





| Level | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | ... |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experience Points | 100 | 100 | 200 | 300 | 500 | 800 | 1300 | 2100 | ... |
| Day | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experience Points | 5 | 10 | 15 | 50 | 100 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).