Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Prognostic Value of Response to Inhaled Nitric Oxide Administration in Patients with ARDS Related to SARS-CoV-2 Infection

Version 1 : Received: 19 March 2024 / Approved: 21 March 2024 / Online: 21 March 2024 (12:01:45 CET)

How to cite: Baratta, P.; De Sensi, F.; Cresti, A.; Sposato, B.; Re, F.; Spargi, G.; Limbruno, U. Prognostic Value of Response to Inhaled Nitric Oxide Administration in Patients with ARDS Related to SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Preprints 2024, 2024031276. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202403.1276.v1 Baratta, P.; De Sensi, F.; Cresti, A.; Sposato, B.; Re, F.; Spargi, G.; Limbruno, U. Prognostic Value of Response to Inhaled Nitric Oxide Administration in Patients with ARDS Related to SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Preprints 2024, 2024031276. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202403.1276.v1

Abstract

Background: The role of inhaled Nitric Oxide (iNO) in managing Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Covid-19 related (C-ARDS) is debatable. The study aimed to analyze the effect of iNO administration in patients with persistent severe hypoxia and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) mortality. Methods: This retrospective study included 98 consecutive critically ill patients with C-ARDS admitted to ICU from 1 October 2020 to 31 October 2021. Results: Of these patients, 28% had received iNO. Twelve (44.4%) were responders. Kaplan-Mayer plot shows mortality was higher in non-responders (86.6 vs 25.0%). Non-response to iNo was the most important predictive value (p. 0.01). The Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve for a percentage increase in PaO2 from baseline confirmed that it had a higher predictive value for in-hospital survival. A value of 19% can predict the death event with a sensitivity of 81.8% and a specificity of 81.2%. Conclusions: Therefore, we propose to use iNO as a vasoreactivity test for prognostic stratification in patients with persistent severe hypoxia.

Keywords

Inhaled nitric oxide; ARDS; Sars CoV-2; Vasoreactivity Test

Subject

Medicine and Pharmacology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.