Biodiesel Production and Evaluation Using Chlorella vulgaris That Has Been Grown in Industrial Dairy Wastewater

1. Introduction

In several countries, water pollution from dairy industries represents a serious environmental problem, which consists mainly of the pollution material released into the water effluents and the relative quantity of water used in the process [1,2]. The wastewater generated from the dairy industry is high in lipids, protein, and carbohydrates but also high in nitrogen and phosphorous-based components [3]. On average, the dairy industry generates from two to five liters of wastewater per liter of milk-based products produced [4]. In the last decades, attention has been paid to the use of microalgae as a resource for treating wastewater from various industrial activities, containing either organic or inorganic components [3,5]. Most of the studies focus on the use of microalgae, from various species, as a nature-based treatment technology or phytoremediation process to remove metals and other hazardous components from contaminated water. Through the last decades, more attention has been attributed to the use of wastewater as a medium for microalgae cultivation to produce secondary algae-based products, which have high interest in different industrial fields like pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and food, to mention some [6]Gramegna et al., 2020). In such instances, microalgae represent an approach to reduce the issue related to the dairy industry wastewater, which has to be disposed of, but also to valorize the waste to produce indirectly valuable compounds [7]Silva et al., 2018).

Microalgae can assimilate and convert organic pollutants into cellular constituents such as lipids and carbohydrates. Conversely, other photosynthetic organisms, such as vascular plants, are used in conventional bioremediation models, which only use inorganic materials. Thus, achieving pollutant reduction in an environmentally friendly way has the potential for further exploitation of microalgal biomass. Moreover, many laboratory and industrial-scale studies report that microalgae could reach up to 70–80% of dry cell weight and be easily converted into highly valuable products among all biofuels [8,9,10,11].

Recent studies have demonstrated that microalgae are a promising feedstock for producing biofuels, in particular the so-called third-generation biodiesel [12,13]. In the last decade, there has been a pressing need to find alternative resources to replace fossil fuels. Initially, attention was focused on the production of biodiesel from crops such as soybean, rapeseed, Jatropha, Karanja, Mahua, Palm, and Castor oil, which are referred to as first- and second-generation biofuels. However, the production of these crops has several limitations, including the requirement for land for cultivation, irrigation, and climate dependence, as well as laborious and time-consuming processes. The entire production process, from cultivation to the final biofuels, is also more expensive than fossil fuels. Biofuels can be classified into four generations. First-generation biofuels are derived from biomass that is typically edible. Second-generation biofuels are produced from a variety of feedstocks, ranging from lignocellulosic to municipal solid waste. Third-generation biofuels are currently associated with algal biomass [14]. For the production of third-generation biofuels, several species of microalgae could be used for high lipid production, such as Nannocloropsis spp., Dunaliella salina, and Chlorella spp., with particular attention given to C.vulgaris [15,16]. The fourth generation is considered biodiesel, coming from the second and third generations of biomass. After genetic modification, C. Reinhardtii and C. Vulgaris are the most studied eukaryotic microalgae on which metabolic engineering has been focused.

C.vulgaris is a versatile microalga that can be found in various applications, for instance, as a food coloring, prescription nutrition ingredient, and detox agent [17,18,19]. It has been shown in clinical studies that supplements based on C. Vulgaris can have health benefits, such as reducing hyperlipidemia and hyperglycemia and protecting against oxidative stress, cancer, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [20]. Additionally, using C. Vulgaris biomass as a feedstock for biofuel production is a sustainable alternative to fossil fuels [21].

To reach high productivity and generate premium-quality biomass, it is important to control the cultivation conditions; including nutrient availability, temperature, and light as the most significant parameters. Choosing the appropriate nutrient medium is crucial for microalgal biomass production, and finding a cost-effective and nutrient-rich medium is important for large-scale operations. While chemical media are commonly used, partially replacing them with organic media like agricultural wastewater, vegetable compost waste, and palm oil mill effluent has been explored as a sustainable option. The present work provides an alternative approach for solving two important themes: dairy wastewater disposal and biofuel production. The microalga C. Vulgaris represents the linking point. Herein, we evaluate the growth, nutrient removal, and lipid accumulation of C. Vulgaris in dairy wastewater, followed by the extraction and characterization of the microalgae lipids and the production of third-generation biodiesel. The physical-chemical properties of the biodiesel have been evaluated in compliance with EN and ASTM standards.

The main goal of the work is to present a feasible approach to using wastewater to grow biomass, followed by biodiesel production (Figure 1). The objective is to reduce the cost and the environmental impact of both dairy wastewater treatment and biodiesel production and valorize waste, transforming it into valuable products.

2. Materials and Methods

2.2. Physicochemical Characteristics of Wastewater

Wastewater was provided by a local dairy factory in glass bottles and did not undergo any purification process. For such reason, the solid particles were removed by filtration using filter paper and then the filtrate was sterilized in an autoclave for 30 minutes to avoid the development of bacterial contamination.

2.3. Microalgae Strain and Cultivation in Dairy Wastewater

The cultivation of Chlorella vulgaris strain was carried out for two weeks in Erlenmeyer flasks using BG11 medium and stored in an incubator at 25 °C and under a fluorescent lamp. The oxygen was provided by an air-compressed system. Four dilutions of the diary wastewater in distilled water (10, 24, 50, and 75 % v/v) were prepared and sterilized in an autoclave at 120°C for 30 minutes prior the use. Afterward, 25*106 cells/ml of chlorella vulgaris were added to each dilution and exposed to 3500 Lux at 25 °C. Cells counting was performed daily, by microscope (Olympus IX81 fluorescence microscope), until the stationary phase was reached.

2.4. Nutrient Content in the Wastewater

Dairy wastewater contains several organic and inorganic components coming from the processing of the milk. Ammonia, total nitrogen, and phosphate content were evaluated before and after the cultivation of C. Vulgaris as it directly affects not only the growth of the microalgae but also the quantitative and qualitative lipids content.

The nutrient removal in the media after algae cultivation was calculated using the following equation [11]:

$$W\left(\%\right)=\frac{C_I-C_N}{C_I}\times 100$$

(1)

Where C_I and C_N represent the average concentration of nutrients (mg/L) at the initial time and at time n, respectively.

2.5. Determination of Algal Biomass

A double beam UV–Vis spectrophotometer (UV-1800, Shimadzu) was used to identify the microalgae cell growth by measuring the absorbance at 680 nm [22]. The dry cell weight (DCW) was calculated as follows; 5 ml of aliquots of culture was filtered by a cellulose acetate membrane filter (0.45 µm pore size). Afterward, the filters were dried for 8 h at 90 ◦C and by the weight of the empty and full filter, the DCW was calculated. Then, by the absorbance values at 680 nm, the biomass concentration was obtained. A blank sample of each culture combination was used to reduce the interference of the medium color in the absorbance area. The filtrate was then centrifugated at 6000 rpm for 15 min; the supernatant was collected and the pellet was lyophilized and used for further qualitative and quantitative analysis.

The biomass growth productivity (PB), expressed as (mg/L/d) was calculated by the equation below [23]:

$$PB=\frac{W_2-W_1}{t_2-t_1}$$

(2)

While the specific growth rate, µ (d^-1), as follows:

$$\mathrm{\mu }=\frac{\ln (W_2-W_1)}{t_2-t_1}$$

(3)

W₁ and W₂ are the dry cell weight (mg/L) at time starting (t₁) and ending (t₂) time, respectively.

2.6. Extraction of Algal Oil from C. Vulgaris

Algal oil was extracted from C. Vulgaris following the Folch method with minor modification [24]. 5 mL of methanol and 5 mL of chloroform were added to 100 mg of dried and ground algal biomass. The biomass-solvents mixture was vigorously shaken for 30 minutes to favor the extraction. These steps were repeated twice to maximize the extraction. Methanol: chloroform: distilled water (1:2:1) mixture was then added and the mixture again vigorously shacked and then let to settle in a separating funnel. The solvent layer was separated by using anhydrous Na₂SO₄. The final product was collected and dried in a ventilated oven at 50°C until a constant weight was achieved. The lipid content was quantified gravimetrically.

2.7. Biodiesel Production and FAME Profile

The biodiesel was obtained by transesterification following the procedure reported in our previous work [25]. In brief, 100 g of algae oil was firstly heated at 120 °C for 15 min under stirring to remove the moisture and then transferred to a 250 mL glass flask. Afterward, a 50 ml of methanol solution containing 2g of the catalyst (KOH) was prepared. A defined volume of the methoxide/ethoxide solution was poured into the oil to have the alcohol: oil molar ratio of 12:1, and the reaction was left to run at 65 °C for 30 minutes.

Afterward, the stirring and temperature were shut off, the solution transferred in a separating funnel and the two phases were left to separate by gravity. The biodiesel was separated from the glycerol and washed one time with an aqueous acetic acid solution (1% v/v) and three times with distilled water to remove side products, unreacted catalysts, and soaps. Then, the obtained biodiesel was heated at 150 °C for 30 min to remove the residual moisture coming from the washing process.

The biodiesel yield was calculated using the following equation [26]:

$$Y=\frac{M_b}{M_o}$$

(4)

where Y represents the yield (g), M_b is the mass of biodiesel (g), and M_o is the mass of algae oil (g).

The qualitative and quantitative analysis of the fatty-free methyl acid was performed by gas chromatography (FID detector) using the methodology reported in our previous work [25].

The sample was directly collected from the separation funnel and before being analyzed, the biodiesel was washed as reported above.

The following gas chromatography setup has been used: capillary column 30 × 0.31 × 0.25; helium as gas carrier, flow rate of 1 mL/min; temperature injection 280 °C; temperature detector 300°C; and temperature ramp 10 °C /min starting from 220 °C.

The total FAME (Fatty Acid Methyl Esters), expressed in percentage, was calculated referring to the total mass of the biodiesel using the following equation [26]:

$$FAME\left(\%\right)=\frac{\sum m}{b}\times 100$$

(5)

where m is the mass of each fatty acid (g) and b is the total biodiesel mass (g).

The total content of FAME was compared to the EN 14214 standard. The measurements were performed in triplicate

2.8. Biodiesel Physical-Chemical Evaluation

2.8.1. Kinematic Viscosity

The kinematic viscosity represents one of the reasons why biodiesel is used as an alternative fuel instead of using directly vegetable oils or animal fats [27]. The kinematic viscosity of the biodiesel, the petrol-diesel, and their blends has been measured following the EN ISO 3104 and EN ISO 3105 procedures. According to EN ISO 3104, 05, the kinematic viscosity must be in the range of 1.9 and 6.0 mm2/s for the. The dynamic viscosity was determined using Anton-Paar MCR 502 at 40 °C as already described in the report in our previous work [25]. Each measurement has been performed in triplicate at three shear rates: 7.5 s⁻¹; 15 s⁻¹ and 37 s⁻¹.

By knowing the dynamic viscosity, the kinematic viscosity was obtained by the following equation:

$$v=\frac{\mathrm{ƞ}}{\mathsf{\rho }}$$

(6)

where v, ƞ, ρ, are the kinematic viscosity (m²/s), the fluid density (Kg/m³), and the dynamic viscosity (Pa·s), respectively.

2.8.2. Calorific Value

The calorific value was measured by the oxygen bomb calorimeter following the ASTMD240-14 standard. The calorimeter was calibrated using benzoic acid at 20 °C [28].

2.8.3. Flash Point

The flash point of the biodiesel, fossil diesel, and their blends was measured with a Pensky–Martens closed-cup apparatus following the protocol reported by the EN 14214 standard. According to the EN standard, the minimum temperature is 101°C.

2.8.4. Density

The density is defined as the mass per unit volume. In biodiesel, there is a reverse correlation between the molecular weight of the fatty acid chains and the amount of unsaturation. In other words, the density increases when the molecular weight and the unsaturation decrease [29]. Generally, biodiesel fuels have a higher density than fossil diesel and produce more than three times the energy of the same amount of fossil fuel [30].

The biodiesel density was measured following the EN ISO (International Organization for Standardization) 12185 test method. The EN 14214 sets the density at 15 °C at between 860-900 kg/m³.

2.8.5. Cetane Number

The cetane number (CN) represents the ignitability of the fuel. The CN is a fundamental property of biodiesel and is critical during engine start, especially in cold conditions [30]. CN is defined as the percentage by volume of the normal cetane in a mixture of normal cetane and α – methyl naphthalene which has the same ignition characteristics (ignition delay) as the test fuel when combustion is carried out in a standard engine under specified operating conditions [27].

The CN requirement for the engine depends on the composition of the fuel, which is related to the feedstock [31]Demirbas, 2007). The CN decreases as the unsaturation increases. Low cetane number leads to long ignition delay, conversely, biodiesel containing low unsaturated fatty acid has a higher CN meaning a fast and smooth engine operation [32,33]. Compared to fossil diesel, the CN in biodiesel is generally higher.

2.8.6. Elemental Analysis

The biodiesel and diesel content in carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, sulfur, and oxygen has been measured by Thermo Scientific Flash 2000 CHNS/O.

2.9. Generator Performance Test

To evaluate the engine performance using the biodiesel-made oil extracted by C.Vulgaris cultivated in dairy wastewater, alone and blended with the fossil diesel, the electric generator tests were performed.

The generator was fueled with pure biodiesel (100%) and with biodiesel-diesel blends at 10, 25, 50, and 75% biodiesel.

The electric generator (Denyo DA-2805) connected to an electric dynamometer operated at 100%, 75%, 50%, 25%, and 0% of loading and 3,000 rpm.

At each load percentage, the following were measured; i) the engine speed; ii) the fuel flow rate; and iii) the brake torque. The concentration of CO, CO₂, and NO_x emitted were also monitored by an emission analyzer (Testo model 350XL), and the smoke concentration by a smoke meter (HORIBA model MEXA-130S).

The brake-specific fuel consumption (BSFC) was calculated as follows [34]:

$$BSFC=\frac{F_c}{P_b}$$

(7)

where Fc is the fuel consumption (g/h) while Pb represents the brake power (kW).

The brake mean effective pressure (BMEP) is an index of the engine load and was obtained by the equation [34]:

$$BMEP=\frac{\mathsf{\pi }}{4VT}$$

(8)

where T is the engine torque (N·m) and V is the stroke volume of the engine piston (m³).

2.10. Statistical Analysis

Data for each parameter were analyzed statistically using the Analysis of variance (ANOVA)

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Effect of Wastewater Dilution on C.vulgaris Biomass

In Table 1 the physicochemical characteristics of the wastewater used for growing algae are reported (mg/L).

The results of the influence of the wastewater dilution at 10, 25 50, and 75% v/v in distilled water on the C. Vulgaris biomass are resumed in Figure 2A.

The algae biomass growth in the dairy wastewater at 10, 25, 50, and 75 % v/v dilutions was compared with the control growth medium. From the trend in Figure 2, the highest yield is observed at 50% dilution, and the highest biomass concentrations were found to be 3,59 (g/L) and 3.13 g/L at 50% and 25% dilution, respectively. Biomass in the control medium resulted in 2,05 g/L followed by 0,78 g/L and 0,57 g/L for 75% and 10% dilution.

Following the trend (Figure 2A) at the two extremes (10% and 75% dilution) the microalgae enter the stationary phase on the 10th day while at the same time, those cultivated at 50% and 25% v/v dilution are still growing and enter in the stationary phase only at the 12th day.

Generally, C. Vulgaris takes up to 14 – 16 days to reach its stationary growth phase with the BG-11 culture medium (control) [35].

The primary role of the culture medium is to initiate the exponential growth process until the microalgae have adapted to their new medium and to keep the stationary phase going. Thus, it is important to identify the optimal dilution of the dairy wastewater. The light source also plays a significant role in biomass growth; herein, 24 h of LED fluorescence light is on both sides of the photobioreactor to avoid biomass loss during the night.

The light availability strongly influences the algae growth and the media dilution plays an important role. The control media is colorless while the dairy wastewater is opaque. The different opacity in the wastewater-based media might obstruct light from reaching the microalgae and limit their growth. It can be the reason explanation of the lowest biomass growth at higher concentrations of wastewater [3].

In Table 2, the calculated parameters including daily biomass productivity and basic growth rate of C. Vulgaris on the 14th day are resumed. Although the medium with lower dilution was the lightest in color intensity after the control, the biomass productivity measured was almost 6 times lower than in the control.

As reported in a similar work [22] the reduction in biomass growth could be ascribed to the lack of nutrient supply in the culture medium. For an optimal cultivation process, a proper mix of nutrient sources with adequate light penetration must be ensured. Thus, it is not desirable to entirely substitute the inorganic medium [36]. Other influencing factors such as temperature, and CO₂ supply were kept constant during the cultivation process to avoid any additional influences on biomass development [37].

3.2. Effect of Different Dilutions of Wastewater on Nutrient Removal

The data in Table 3 shows a difference between nitrates, phosphate, and ammonia biological removal at different wastewater dilutions. The higher values of nitrate and ammonia removal are observed at 75% dilution, while phosphate is at 50%. The lowest values for all the parameters are at 10% dilution.

The reason for efficient performance in wastewater and effluent of the dairy industry may be the presence of enough nutrients, including nitrogen and phosphorus, essential microalgae growth. Previous works [3,38] have shown that algae need NH3-N and phosphorus to produce amino acids and phospholipids respectively [39]. In another study dealing with the isolation of Chlorella vulgaris from pig wastewater and its ability to remove nutrients from untreated wastewater, it has been reported that total nitrogen removal after 12 days is 90% which concerns the ability of C.vulgaris to absorb nitrogen; this study is consistent with the present study.

3.3. Lipid Extraction from Chlorella vulgaris Biomass

The green microalga, C. Vulgaris was found to be dominant in the environment producing a greater quantity of biomass and high lipids yield [3,11,39]. The total content of lipids for the cultivated C. Vulgaris was found to be 24 ± 2% depending upon the different cell disruption methods adopted (data not shown). It was comparatively higher than a recent study with a lipid content of 18.7 wt. % was reported [40]. Microalgae lipids extraction is known to increase with the degree of cell disruption. During the extraction, cells are disintegrated and the intracellular lipids and cellular bodies are released into the surrounding microenvironment [41,42]. Herein, the grinding method was used to disrupt the cell components and maximize the lipid release. The lipid content in C. Vulgaris was found to be 3 mg/L after grinding. These results agree with those reported in previous studies [43]. This method has been demonstrated to be valid for scaling up.

3.4. Physical-Chemical Characterization

3.4.1. Biodiesel Yield, Kinematic Viscosity, Density, and Calorific Value

In our previous work [25], we found the optimal condition for the transesterification reaction using methanol and KOH to maximize the yield. Previously we used a different feedstock, including sunflower and rapeseed oil as a source of lipids, however here we propose the same condition but a different oil source. The reaction conditions were as follows; i) methanol to oil molar ratio 12; ii) KOH as catalyst (40 mg/ml methanol); iii) reaction time and temperature 30°C and 65°C, respectively. Herein, the biodiesel yield was 93 % ± 4, which is slightly less than the value obtained using rapeseed and sunflower oil. However, comparing the obtained yield, with those reported in similar works in which C. Vulgaris has been used as biomass for biodiesel production [44,45,46] the yield can be considered satisfactory as it exceeds the 90g per 100g of vegetable oil (Table 4).

In the automotive, the biodiesel viscosity represents a key parameter to determine as it directly influences the starting and the performance of the diesel engine. The kinematic viscosity at 40 °C is the parameter required by biodiesel and petroleum diesel standard.

As reported in published works dealing with biodiesel production by transesterification using KOH as a catalyst [47]; the viscosity is a result of the transesterification conditions and in particular the type of alcohol and the alcohol to oil molar ratio. The kinematic viscosity measured at 40°C, following the methodology described by the EN standards, falls in the range between 3.6 and 5.2 mm²/s² in a reverse relation with the shear rate. In fact, at a higher shear rate, the lowest kinematic viscosity has been observed. However, as can be seen, the viscosity values at each shear rate are comparable and no statistical differences are present.

Together with the kinematic viscosity, the biodiesel density provides information to predict the engine power performance and consequently the fuel consumption [48]. The biodiesel’s density is related to the purity of the feedstock, the fatty acids composition, and the total content. The density at 15°C was 0.875 ± 0.019 and it represents an acceptable value as it falls in the required range of 0.860 – 0.900 gm/cm3

The calorific value is the thermal energy released by the combustion of a unit of fuel, giving the energy content of the fuel [49]. As for the viscosity, the calorific value depends on the nature of the feedstock and only in minor by the transesterification conditions. Using C. Vulgaris as fat source, the calorific value of the produced biodiesel was 37.5 ± 1.4 MJ/Kg, which is a positive value in line with the EN 14214 and ASTM D6751 requirements.

3.4.2. Flash Point

The flash point is the lowest temperature at which a sufficient concentration of vapors is released from the fuel, which upon mixing with air ignite [50]. The presence of fatty acid methyl esters is responsible for the higher biodiesel flashpoint compared to the fossil diesel making it safer to handle at high temperatures. As biodiesel, in the automotive, is used in a mixture with fossil diesel, the flashpoint of pure biodiesel and blends of biodiesel-diesel has been evaluated and the results are reported in Figure 3.

The flash point in pure biodiesel varies according to the source and the quality of the oil; herein the flash point temperature, obtained, was 131°C, almost double that of the fossil diesel 73°C. As already reported [25], in the biodiesel-diesel blend by increasing the content of diesel, the flash point decreases I in a quasi-linear correlation. The clear correlation between the biodiesel quantity in a diesel-biodiesel blend and its flash point. This means that the experimental determination of a flash point temperature also provides information regarding the biodiesel content of diesel-biodiesel blends. Conversely, if the percentage of biodiesel in a diesel-biodiesel blend is known, the flashpoint can be estimated if the flash points of diesel and pure biodiesel. From the obtained results, it is also clear that, for diesel-biodiesel blends with lower contents of biodiesel, the flash point is mainly determined by that of the mineral diesel.

3.4.3. FAME Composition

The lipids extracted from C. Vulgaris were in the range of 9-11% of the dried weight (30 g of the algal dried biomass). The content, obtained by gravimetric analysis, makes the selected biomass and its growing approach a suitable strategy for the 3rd generation type biodiesel production.

It is well established that the quality of the biodiesel is determined by the fatty acid content, in particular their molecular weight and the saturation and unsaturation degree. Biodiesels containing saturated and mono-unsaturated fatty acids result in superior quality as reported by international standards. The FAME (Fatty Acid Methyl Ester) profile of the obtained biodiesel from C.Vulgaris biomass is resumed in Table 5. The data shows a major content of saturated and mono-unsaturated FAME. The mains are Tridecanoic acid (C13:0), Palmitic acid (C16:0), Erucic acid (22:1) Myristoleic acid (C14:1), Linolelaidic acid (C18:2), G Linolenic acid (C18:3). The obtained results indicate that the biodiesel obtained from C. vulgaris cultivated in dairy wastewater has 33.53% saturated, 28.68% monounsaturated and 37.12% polyunsaturated fatty acids content [24].

3.5. Generator Performance Test

In Figure 4 A and B, the generator performance test results are reported. As can be seen, no significant differences are observable in the BMEP among the 3 formulations; fossil diesel, biodiesel, and blends fossil diesel-biodiesel. Conversely, differences are observable in the BSFC, for pure biodiesel was almost 20% higher than in the mineral diesel. Following reported studies, such difference could be ascribed to the difference in the calorific value of the two fuels. The blends, as expected have values of BSFC displaced between the 2 extremes; 100% biodiesel and 100% fossil diesel.

Figure 5 presents correlations between biodiesel concentration and the variation in emissions. As increasing biodiesel concentration, CO and smoke emissions decreased, while NO_x and CO₂ increased. The percent change in emissions of CO₂, NO_x, CO, and smoke, using pure-form biodiesel, was +18%, +15%, -60%, and -19%, respectively. These results were attributed to the improvement of combustibility and the increase in combustion temperature due to oxygen-containing biodiesel. Biodiesel has carbon neutrality, which prevents the increase of CO₂ emission in the atmosphere. This section may be divided by subheadings. It should provide a concise and precise description of the experimental results, their interpretation, as well as the experimental conclusions that can be drawn.

4. Conclusions

The application of dairy wastewater as a growth medium for C.Vulgaris may result in a promising production of lipids. The resulting lipids can then be used for producing biodiesel, an environmentally friendly substitute for conventional petroleum-based fuels. The outcomes show that dairy wastewater, which is high in nutrients like phosphorus and nitrogen which are eutrophic agents, can support the growth of C. Vulgaris algae. When cultivated on dairy effluent instead of traditional growth media, the algae's lipid content was found to be much higher, indicating that utilizing this wastewater could substantially boost the synthesis of lipids. By providing a method of wastewater treatment, the use of dairy effluent for the cultivation of algae additionally offers the added benefit of reducing the environmental effect of dairy farming. Growing C. Vulgaris algae in dairy wastewater has the potential to be a profitable and environmentally friendly approach to produce biodiesel. A new sector for the generation of renewable energy from dairy effluent could be established as a result of more research and development in this field.