Submitted:
01 March 2024
Posted:
04 March 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. BCI System
Integration of BCI System with Physiological Signals EEG
- Pre-processing: The extracted signals are then pre-processed to remove artifacts, noise, and any unwanted interferences [3]. This is a crucial step that ensures that the data is clean enough and suitable for further analysis.
- Extracting Features: Relevant significant features are later extracted from these pre-processed signals, including amplitude value, components, frequency, or other key characteristics that carry insightful information about the users’ condition or state.
- Processing Signals: The extracted features are required to undergo further signal processing stages that may involve transformation, filtering, or other mathematical and statistical operations to enhance the information and prepare it for detailed analysis.
- Recognizing Patterns: Machine learning, deep learning algorithms or other pattern recognition techniques are employed to analyze the extracted features. These algorithms undergo training to identify and recognize signatures or patterns within the data that correspond to physiological or mental states [4].
- Making Decisions: The BCI system makes determinations based on the patterns related to the user’s intentions or states [5]. As an illustration, it can determine whether the user wants to manipulate a cursor on a particular screen or initiate a command.
- Controlling Command Generation: The BCI system converts the decision into a control command for an external application or device. Such command generation encompasses a wide range of potential actions, such as controlling robotic arms, computer cursors, wheelchairs, or any other devices or software aligned with users intend to interact with.
- External Device’s Output: The generated control commands are transmitted into the external devices or applications, subsequently carrying out the desired actions or responses to the user’s intent.
- End: The BCI system continues looping through these stages, allowing real-time interaction between users and external devices/applications. The process operates as continuous and adaptive, with the BCI system constantly updating its understanding of the user’s intentions.
3. Applications of BCI
3.1. Accessibility
3.1.1. Prosthetic Control
3.1.2. Rehabilitation
3.1.3. Wheelchair Mobility
3.1.4. Virtual Reality Accessibility
3.1.5. Augmented and Alternative Communication
3.2. General Medical Applications
3.2.1. Medication Optimization
3.2.2. Pain Management
3.2.3. Surgical Planning
3.2.4. Sleep Disorder Monitoring
3.2.5. Human-Computer Interaction (HCI)
3.2.6. Communication Assistance
3.3. Psychology or Neurology
3.3.1. Alzheimer Disease Treatment
3.3.2. Depression
3.3.3. Epilepsy
3.3.4. Emotion Classification
3.3.5. Seizure
3.3.6. Stress Evaluation
3.3.7. Cognitive Impairment
3.3.8. Neuropsychiatric Disorder
3.3.9. Anxiety Assessment
3.3.10. Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
3.4. Pediatric Applications
3.4.1. Pediatric Neurorehabilitation
3.4.2. Neurodevelopmental Monitoring
3.5. Personalized Medicine
3.5.1. Neurofeedback Therapy
3.5.2. Individual Treatment Planning
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Tian, Z. Research on the relationship between brain signal analysis algorithm and invasive brain computer interface. International Conference on Mathematics, Modeling and Computer Science (MMCS2022). LOCATION OF CONFERENCE, ChinaDATE OF CONFERENCE; pp. 442–448.
- Feng, J. Research on physiological signal analysis based on clinical statistics and machine learning. in Second International Conference on Biological Engineering and Medical Science (ICBioMed 2022). 2023. SPIE.
- Murphy, D.P.; Bai, O.; Gorgey, A.S.; Fox, J.; Lovegreen, W.T.; Burkhardt, B.W.; Atri, R.; Marquez, J.S.; Li, Q.; Fei, D.-Y. Electroencephalogram-Based Brain–Computer Interface and Lower-Limb Prosthesis Control: A Case Study. Front. Neurol. 2017, 8, 696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Joadder, M.; Siuly, S.; Kabir, E.; Wang, H.; Zhang, Y. A New Design of Mental State Classification for Subject Independent BCI Systems. IRBM 2019, 40, 297–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Toma, F.-M. A hybrid neuro-experimental decision support system to classify overconfidence and performance in a simulated bubble using a passive BCI. Expert Syst. Appl. 2023, 212, 118722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Padfield, N.; Zabalza, J.; Zhao, H.; Masero, V.; Ren, J. EEG-Based Brain-Computer Interfaces Using Motor-Imagery: Techniques and Challenges. Sensors 2019, 19, 1423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Niketeghad, S.; Pouratian, N. Brain Machine Interfaces for Vision Restoration: The Current State of Cortical Visual Prosthetics. Neurotherapeutics 2018, 16, 134–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vallabhaneni, A., T. Wang, and B. He, Brain—computer interface, in Neural engineering. 2005, Springer. p. 85-121.
- Kwon, O.-Y.; Lee, M.-H.; Guan, C.; Lee, S.-W. Subject-Independent Brain–Computer Interfaces Based on Deep Convolutional Neural Networks. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks Learn. Syst. 2019, 31, 3839–3852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Manyakov, N.V.; Chumerin, N.; Combaz, A.; Van Hulle, M.M. Comparison of Classification Methods for P300 Brain-Computer Interface on Disabled Subjects. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2011, 2011, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Guger, C.; et al. Prosthetic control by an EEG-based brain-computer interface (BCI). in Proc. aaate 5th european conference for the advancement of assistive technology. 1999. Citeseer.
- Miranda, R.A.; Casebeer, W.D.; Hein, A.M.; Judy, J.W.; Krotkov, E.P.; Laabs, T.L.; Manzo, J.E.; Pankratz, K.G.; Pratt, G.A.; Sanchez, J.C.; et al. DARPA-funded efforts in the development of novel brain–computer interface technologies. J. Neurosci. Methods 2015, 244, 52–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Katyal, K.D.; Johannes, M.S.; Kellis, S.; Aflalo, T.; Klaes, C.; McGee, T.G.; Para, M.P.; Shi, Y.; Lee, B.; Pejsa, K.; et al. A collaborative BCI approach to autonomous control of a prosthetic limb system. 2014 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics - SMC. LOCATION OF CONFERENCE, United StatesDATE OF CONFERENCE; pp. 1479–1482.
- Laiwalla, F.; Lee, J.; Lee, A.-H.; Mok, E.; Leung, V.; Shellhammer, S.; Song, Y.-K.; Larson, L.; Nurmikko, A. A Distributed Wireless Network of Implantable Sub-mm Cortical Microstimulators for Brain-Computer Interfaces. 2019 41st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC). LOCATION OF CONFERENCE, GermanyDATE OF CONFERENCE; pp. 6876–6879.
- Chapin, J.K.; Moxon, K.A.; Markowitz, R.S.; Nicolelis, M.A.L. Real-time control of a robot arm using simultaneously recorded neurons in the motor cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 1999, 2, 664–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oppus, C.M.; Prado, J.R.R.; Escobar, J.C.; Marinas, J.A.G.; Reyes, R.S. Brain-computer interface and voice-controlled 3D printed prosthetic hand. TENCON 2016 - 2016 IEEE Region 10 Conference. LOCATION OF CONFERENCE, SingaporeDATE OF CONFERENCE; pp. 2689–2693.
- Mishchenko, Y.; Kaya, M.; Ozbay, E.; Yanar, H. Developing a Three- to Six-State EEG-Based Brain–Computer Interface for a Virtual Robotic Manipulator Control. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2018, 66, 977–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aly, H.I.; Youssef, S.; Fathy, C. Hybrid brain computer interface for movement control of upper limb prostheses. in 2018 International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Applications (ICBEA). 2018. IEEE.
- Flesher, S.N.; Downey, J.E.; Weiss, J.M.; Hughes, C.L.; Herrera, A.J.; Tyler-Kabara, E.C.; Boninger, M.L.; Collinger, J.L.; Gaunt, R.A. A brain-computer interface that evokes tactile sensations improves robotic arm control. Science 2021, 372, 831–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Saha, S.; Baumert, M. Intra- and Inter-subject Variability in EEG-Based Sensorimotor Brain Computer Interface: A Review. Front. Comput. Neurosci. 2020, 13, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Carelli, L.; Solca, F.; Faini, A.; Meriggi, P.; Sangalli, D.; Cipresso, P.; Riva, G.; Ticozzi, N.; Ciammola, A.; Silani, V.; et al. Brain-Computer Interface for Clinical Purposes: Cognitive Assessment and Rehabilitation. BioMed Res. Int. 2017, 2017, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ang, K.K.; Chua, K.S.G.; Phua, K.S.; Wang, C.; Chin, Z.Y.; Kuah, C.W.K.; Low, W.; Guan, C. A Randomized Controlled Trial of EEG-Based Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interface Robotic Rehabilitation for Stroke. Clin. EEG Neurosci. 2014, 46, 310–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ang, K.K.; Guan, C. Brain–Computer Interface for Neurorehabilitation of Upper Limb After Stroke. Proc. IEEE 2015, 103, 944–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lazarou, I.; Nikolopoulos, S.; Petrantonakis, P.C.; Kompatsiaris, I.; Tsolaki, M. EEG-Based Brain–Computer Interfaces for Communication and Rehabilitation of People with Motor Impairment: A Novel Approach of the 21st Century. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2018, 12, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Savić, A.M.; Novičić, M.; Ðorđević, O.; Konstantinović, L.; Miler-Jerković, V. Novel electrotactile brain-computer interface with somatosensory event-related potential based control. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2023, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jeon, H.; Shin, D.A. Experimental Set Up of P300 Based Brain Computer Interface Using a Bioamplifier and BCI2000 System for Patients with Spinal Cord Injury. Korean J. Spine 2015, 12, 119–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Miguel-Fernández, J. Control strategies used in lower limb exoskeletons for gait rehabilitation after brain injury: a systematic review and analysis of clinical effectiveness. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation 2023, 20, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seguin, P.; Maby, E.; Fouillen, M.; Otman, A.; Luaute, J.; Giraux, P.; Morlet, D.; Mattout, J. The challenge of controlling an auditory BCI in the case of severe motor disability. medRxiv p. 2023.01. 10.23284295. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mounir, R.; Alqasemi, R.; Dubey, R. Bci-controlled hands-free wheelchair navigation with obstacle avoidance. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2005.04209. [Google Scholar]
- Permana, K.; Wijaya, S.K.; Prajitno, P. Controlled wheelchair based on brain computer interface using Neurosky Mindwave Mobile 2. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 4TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON CURRENT PROGRESS IN MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCES (ISCPMS2018). LOCATION OF CONFERENCE, IndonesiaDATE OF CONFERENCE; p. 020022.
- Eidel, M.; et al. A tactile brain-computer interface for virtual wheelchair control at home. in 2021 9th International Winter Conference on Brain-Computer Interface (BCI). 2021. IEEE.
- Huang, Q.; et al. An EEG-/EOG-based hybrid brain-computer interface: Application on controlling an integrated wheelchair robotic arm system. Frontiers in neuroscience, 2019. 13: p. 1243.
- Meng, J.; Zhang, S.; Bekyo, A.; Olsoe, J.; Baxter, B.; He, B. Noninvasive Electroencephalogram Based Control of a Robotic Arm for Reach and Grasp Tasks. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 38565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Edelman, B.J.; Meng, J.; Suma, D.; Zurn, C.; Nagarajan, E.; Baxter, B.S.; Cline, C.C.; He, B. Noninvasive neuroimaging enhances continuous neural tracking for robotic device control. Sci. Robot. 2019, 4, eaaw6844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Belkacem, A.N.; Jamil, N.; Palmer, J.A.; Ouhbi, S.; Chen, C. Brain Computer Interfaces for Improving the Quality of Life of Older Adults and Elderly Patients. Front. Neurosci. 2020, 14, 692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, X.; Li, X.; Li, W.; Hao, B.; Xie, Y.; Dang, X. Transfer Learning: Rotation Alignment With Riemannian Mean for Brain–Computer Interfaces and Wheelchair Control. IEEE Trans. Cogn. Dev. Syst. 2021, 15, 487–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, T.; Huo, Z.; Zhang, L.; Dong, Z.; Niu, L.; Kang, X.; Huang, X. A VR-based BCI interactive system for UAV swarm control. Biomed. Signal Process. Control. 2023, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Satam, I.A. Safety and Security Aspects of Implanted Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) for Human-Robot Interaction.
- Ji, T.F.; Cochran, B.; Zhao, Y. VRBubble: Enhancing Peripheral Awareness of Avatars for People with Visual Impairments in Social Virtual Reality. ASSETS '22: The 24th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. LOCATION OF CONFERENCE, GreeceDATE OF CONFERENCE;
- Lopez, M.; Kearney, G.; Hofstädter, K. Seeing films through sound: Sound design, spatial audio, and accessibility for visually impaired audiences. Br. J. Vis. Impair. 2020, 40, 117–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karas, K.; Pozzi, L.; Pedrocchi, A.; Braghin, F.; Roveda, L. Brain-computer interface for robot control with eye artifacts for assistive applications. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 17512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, S.; Rabbani, Q.; Crone, N.E. Brain-Computer Interface: Applications to Speech Decoding and Synthesis to Augment Communication. Neurotherapeutics 2022, 19, 263–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, H.; Karlsson, P.; Chiu, D.; Sun, C.; Kavehei, O.; McEwan, A. Wearable augmentative and alternative communication (wAAC): a novel solution for people with complex communication needs. Virtual Real. 2023, 27, 2441–2459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boster, J.B.; Findlen, U.M.; Pitt, K.; McCarthy, J.W. Design of aided augmentative and alternative communication systems for children with vision impairment: psychoacoustic perspectives. Augment. Altern. Commun. 2023, 40, 57–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pitt, K.M.; Brumberg, J.S. Evaluating person-centered factors associated with brain–computer interface access to a commercial augmentative and alternative communication paradigm. Assist. Technol. 2021, 34, 468–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pitt, K.M.; McKelvey, M.; Weissling, K. The perspectives of augmentative and alternative communication experts on the clinical integration of non-invasive brain-computer interfaces. Brain-Computer Interfaces 2022, 9, 193–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karikari, E.; Koshechkin, K.A. Review on brain-computer interface technologies in healthcare. Biophys. Rev. 2023, 15, 1351–1358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tang, X.; et al. Flexible brain–computer interfaces. Nature Electronics, 2023. 6(2): p. 109-118.
- Lyu, X.; Ding, P.; Li, S.; Dong, Y.; Su, L.; Zhao, L.; Gong, A.; Fu, Y. Human factors engineering of BCI: an evaluation for satisfaction of BCI based on motor imagery. Cogn. Neurodynamics 2022, 17, 105–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Popa, L.L.; Chira, D.; Strilciuc, Ș.; Mureșanu, D.F. Non-Invasive Systems Application in Traumatic Brain Injury Rehabilitation. Brain Sci. 2023, 13, 1594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Colamarino, E.; Lorusso, M.; Pichiorri, F.; Toppi, J.; Tamburella, F.; Serratore, G.; Riccio, A.; Tomaiuolo, F.; Bigioni, A.; Giove, F. DiSCIoser: unlocking recovery potential of arm sensorimotor functions after spinal cord injury by promoting activity-dependent brain plasticity by means of brain-computer interface technology: a randomized controlled trial to test efficacy. BMC Neurol. 2023, 23, 414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sengupta, P.; Lakshminarayanan, K. Cortical activation and BCI performance during brief tactile imagery: A comparative study with motor imagery. Behav. Brain Res. 2024, 459, 114760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borgheai, S.B.; Zisk, A.H.; McLinden, J.; Mcintyre, J.; Sadjadi, R.; Shahriari, Y. Multimodal pre-screening can predict BCI performance variability: A novel subject-specific experimental scheme. Comput. Biol. Med. 2024, 168, 107658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ghumman, M.K.; Singh, S.; Singh, N.; Jindal, B. Optimization of parameters for improving the performance of EEG-based BCI system. J. Reliab. Intell. Environ. 2020, 7, 145–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, Y.; Gong, A.; Nan, W.; Ding, P.; Wang, F.; Fu, Y. Personalized Brain–Computer Interface and Its Applications. J. Pers. Med. 2022, 13, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ramadan, R.A.; Altamimi, A.B. Unraveling the potential of brain-computer interface technology in medical diagnostics and rehabilitation: A comprehensive literature review. Heal. Technol. 2024, 14, 263–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Araújo, J.; Simons, B.D.; Goswami, U. Remediating Phonological Deficits in Dyslexia with Brain-Computer Interfaces, in Brain-Computer Interface Research: A State-of-the-Art Summary 11. 2024, Springer. p. 13-19.
- Li, G.; et al. Brain-computer interface training based on visual and motor feedback improves convalescent stroke patients with hemiplegia: a randomized clinical trial. 2024.
- Yang, H.; Yanagisawa, T. Is Phantom Limb Awareness Necessary for the Treatment of Phantom Limb Pain? Neurologia medico-chirurgica, 2024: p. 2023-0206.
- Calzone, M.R.P.-C.; Grossman, M.D. Blunt cardiac injury in the hemodynamically stable patient. J. Am. Acad. Physician Assist. 2024, 37, 35–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jiang, H.; Wang, R.; Zheng, Z.; Zhu, J.; Qi, Y.; Xu, K.; Zhang, J. Short report: surgery for implantable brain-computer interface assisted by robotic navigation system. Acta Neurochir. 2022, 164, 2299–2302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Asman, P.; et al. Real-Time Intraoperative Sensorimotor Cortex Localization and Consciousness Assessment with the Spatial and Spectral Profile of the Median Nerve Somatosensory Evoked Potentials, in Brain-Computer Interface Research: A State-of-the-Art Summary 11. 2024, Springer. p. 123-140.
- Lee, J.W.; Li, M.; Boyd, C.M.; Green, A.R.; Szanton, S.L. Preoperative Deprescribing for Medical Optimization of Older Adults Undergoing Surgery: A Systematic Review. J. Am. Med Dir. Assoc. 2021, 23, 528–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nakamura, T.; et al. Automatic sleep monitoring using ear-EEG. IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine, 2017. 5: p. 1-8.
- Zhang, J.-A.; Mo, G.; Zhang, K. The design and clinical application of sleep disorder treatment system. 2017 10th International Congress on Image and Signal Processing, BioMedical Engineering and Informatics (CISP-BMEI). LOCATION OF CONFERENCE, ChinaDATE OF CONFERENCE; pp. 1–5.
- Lin, C.-T.; et al. IoT-based wireless polysomnography intelligent system for sleep monitoring. IEEE Access, 2017. 6: p. 405-414.
- Xu, S.; Faust, O.; Seoni, S.; Chakraborty, S.; Barua, P.D.; Loh, H.W.; Elphick, H.; Molinari, F.; Acharya, U.R. A review of automated sleep disorder detection. Comput. Biol. Med. 2022, 150, 106100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- MacKenzie, I.S. Human-computer interaction: An empirical research perspective. 2024.
- Mishra, R.; Satpathy, R.; Pati, B. Human Computer Interaction Applications in Healthcare: An Integrative Review. EAI Endorsed Trans. Pervasive Heal. Technol. 2023, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, N. Implementation of a Novel Framework for Physically Disabled Patients using Human-Computer Interface. 2023 2nd International Conference on Edge Computing and Applications (ICECAA). LOCATION OF CONFERENCE, IndiaDATE OF CONFERENCE; pp. 1174–1178.
- Siow, E.K.S.; Chew, W.J.; Mun, H.K. Human Computer Interface (HCI) using EEG signals. in Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2023. IOP Publishing.
- Williams, J.; et al. Detecting and utilizing the idle state in an intracortical brain-computer interface.
- Voity, K.; Lopez, T.; Chan, J.P.; Greenwald, B.D. Update on How to Approach a Patient with Locked-In Syndrome and Their Communication Ability. Brain Sci. 2024, 14, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Metzger, S.L.; et al. Highly generalizable spelling using a silent-speech BCI in a person with severe anarthria, in Brain-Computer Interface Research: A State-of-the-Art Summary 11. 2024, Springer. p. 21-28.
- Zhou, Y.; Yu, T.; Gao, W.; Huang, W.; Lu, Z.; Huang, Q.; Li, Y. Shared Three-Dimensional Robotic Arm Control Based on Asynchronous BCI and Computer Vision. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabilitation Eng. 2023, 31, 3163–3175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chanu, M.P.; Pei, D.; Olikkal, P.; Vinjamuri, R.K.; Kakoty, N.M. Electroencephalogram based Control of Prosthetic Hand using Optimizable Support Vector Machine. AIR 2023: Advances In Robotics - 6th International Conference of The Robotics Society. LOCATION OF CONFERENCE, IndiaDATE OF CONFERENCE;
- Yadav, D.; Yadav, S.; Veer, K. A comprehensive assessment of Brain Computer Interfaces: Recent trends and challenges. J. Neurosci. Methods 2020, 346, 108918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosenfeld, J.V.; Wong, Y.T. Neurobionics and the brain–computer interface: current applications and future horizons. The Medical Journal of Australia 2017, 206, 363–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jamal, S.; Wimmer, H. Performance Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithm on Cloud Platforms: AWS vs Azure vs GCP. 2023. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
- Du, X. Brain stimulation techniques-based neuroregulatory in Alzheimer’s disease. in Third International Conference on Biological Engineering and Medical Science (ICBioMed2023). 2024. SPIE.
- da Silva-Sauer, L.; et al. New perspectives for cognitive rehabilitation: Could brain-computer interface systems benefit people with dementia? Psychology & Neuroscience, 2019. 12(1): p. 25.
- Martínez-Cagigal, V.; Santamaría-Vázquez, E.; Gomez-Pilar, J.; Hornero, R. Towards an accessible use of smartphone-based social networks through brain-computer interfaces. Expert Syst. Appl. 2018, 120, 155–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, S. Research on deep brain stimulation in depression. in Third International Conference on Biological Engineering and Medical Science (ICBioMed2023). 2024. SPIE.
- Widge, A.S.; Malone, D.A.; Dougherty, D.D. Closing the Loop on Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Depression. Front. Neurosci. 2018, 12, 175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liao, S.-C.; Wu, C.-T.; Huang, H.-C.; Cheng, W.-T.; Liu, Y.-H. Major Depression Detection from EEG Signals Using Kernel Eigen-Filter-Bank Common Spatial Patterns. Sensors 2017, 17, 1385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jamal, S.; Cruz, M.V.; Chakravarthy, S.; Wahl, C.; Wimmer, H. Integration of EEG and Eye Tracking Technology: A Systematic Review. SoutheastCon 2023. LOCATION OF CONFERENCE, United StatesDATE OF CONFERENCE; pp. 209–216.
- Yang, B.; Huang, Y.; Li, Z.; Hu, X. Management of post-stroke depression (PSD) by electroencephalography for effective rehabilitation. Eng. Regen. 2023, 4, 44–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gu, X.; Cao, Z.; Jolfaei, A.; Xu, P.; Wu, D.; Jung, T.-P.; Lin, C.-T. EEG-Based Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs): A Survey of Recent Studies on Signal Sensing Technologies and Computational Intelligence Approaches and Their Applications. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform. 2021, 18, 1645–1666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wen, D.; Jia, P.; Lian, Q.; Zhou, Y.; Lu, C. Review of Sparse Representation-Based Classification Methods on EEG Signal Processing for Epilepsy Detection, Brain-Computer Interface and Cognitive Impairment. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2016, 8, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caldwell, D.J.; Ojemann, J.G.; Rao, R.P.N. Direct Electrical Stimulation in Electrocorticographic Brain–Computer Interfaces: Enabling Technologies for Input to Cortex. Front. Neurosci. 2019, 13, 804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Herff, C.; Krusienski, D.J.; Kubben, P. The Potential of Stereotactic-EEG for Brain-Computer Interfaces: Current Progress and Future Directions. Front. Neurosci. 2020, 14, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hong, K.-S.; Khan, M.J. Hybrid Brain–Computer Interface Techniques for Improved Classification Accuracy and Increased Number of Commands: A Review. Front. Neurorobotics 2017, 11, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shaw, L.; Routray, A. Statistical features extraction for multivariate pattern analysis in meditation EEG using PCA. 2016 IEEE EMBS International Student Conference (ISC). LOCATION OF CONFERENCE, CanadaDATE OF CONFERENCE; pp. 1–4.
- Mohammed, N.B. Statistical Modeling and Forecasting of EEG Signal for BCI System Using ARIMA Model. International Journal of Scientific Trends, 2023. 2(3): p. 66-74.
- Jamal, S.; Cruz, M.V.; Kim, J. Cloud-Based Human Emotion Classification Model from EEG Signals. 2023 IEEE 14th Annual Ubiquitous Computing, Electronics & Mobile Communication Conference (UEMCON). LOCATION OF CONFERENCE, United StatesDATE OF CONFERENCE; pp. 0057–0064.
- Garima; Goel, N.; Rathee, N. Modified multidimensional scaling on EEG signals for emotion classification. Multimedia Tools Appl. 2023, 82, 28547–28568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumari, N.; Anwar, S.; Bhattacharjee, V. A Comparative Analysis of Machine and Deep Learning Techniques for EEG Evoked Emotion Classification. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 2022, 128, 2869–2890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, X.; Chen, J.; Ma, W.; Tang, W.; Wang, Y. EEG emotion recognition using improved graph neural network with channel selection. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 2023, 231, 107380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teo, J.; Chia, J.T. EEG-based excitement detection in immersive environments: An improved deep learning approach. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (ICAST’18). LOCATION OF CONFERENCE, MalaysiaDATE OF CONFERENCE; p. 020145.
- Pinilla, A.; Voigt-Antons, J.-N.; Garcia, J.; Raffe, W.; Möller, S. Real-time affect detection in virtual reality: a technique based on a three-dimensional model of affect and EEG signals. Front. Virtual Real. 2023, 3, 964754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Zhou, T.; Wu, W.; Xie, H.; Zhu, H.; Zhou, G.; Cichocki, A. Improving EEG Decoding via Clustering-Based Multitask Feature Learning. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks Learn. Syst. 2021, 33, 3587–3597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fisher, L.E.; Gaunt, R.A.; Huang, H. Sensory restoration for improved motor control of prostheses. Curr. Opin. Biomed. Eng. 2023, 28, 100498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yadav, S.K.; Tiwari, P.K.; Tripathi, A.; Sharma, U.K.; Dixit, P.; Dutt, A.; Prakash, S.; Shukla, N.K. Comparative Analysis of Signal Processing Techniques for Mental State Recognition in Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCI). Wirel. Pers. Commun. 2023, 131, 1569–1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lahane, P. BRAIN COMPUTER INTERFACES TECHNIQUES FOR STRESS MANAGEMENT. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IN INDUSTRY, 2021. 9(3): p. 767-775.
- Lin, S.; Liu, J.; Li, W.; Wang, D.; Huang, Y.; Jia, C.; Li, Z.; Murtaza, M.; Wang, H.; Song, J.; et al. A Flexible, Robust, and Gel-Free Electroencephalogram Electrode for Noninvasive Brain-Computer Interfaces. Nano Lett. 2019, 19, 6853–6861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khosrowabadi, R.; Quek, C.; Ang, K.K.; Tung, S.W.; Heijnen, M. A Brain-Computer Interface for classifying EEG correlates of chronic mental stress. 2011 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN 2011 - San Jose). LOCATION OF CONFERENCE, United StatesDATE OF CONFERENCE; pp. 757–762.
- Biswas, S.; Hairston, W.D.; Metcalfe, J.S.; Bhattacharya, S. EEG based BCI for Autonomous Control: A Review. SoutheastCon 2023. LOCATION OF CONFERENCE, United StatesDATE OF CONFERENCE; pp. 827–832.
- Blommer, J.; Pitcher, T.; Mustapic, M.; Eren, E.; Yao, P.J.; Vreones, M.P.; A Pucha, K.; Dalrymple-Alford, J.; Shoorangiz, R.; Meissner, W.G.; et al. Extracellular vesicle biomarkers for cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease. Brain 2022, 146, 195–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santisteban, M.M.; Iadecola, C.; Carnevale, D. Hypertension, neurovascular dysfunction, and cognitive impairment. Hypertension, 2023. 80(1): p. 22-34.
- McCutcheon, R.A.; Keefe, R.S.; McGuire, P.K. Cognitive impairment in schizophrenia: aetiology, pathophysiology, and treatment. Molecular psychiatry, 2023: p. 1-17.
- Akrami, H.; et al. Prediction of Post Traumatic Epilepsy using MRI-based Imaging Markers. bioRxiv, 2024: p. 2024.01. 12.575454.
- Hasan, M.A.; Sattar, P.; Qazi, S.A.; Fraser, M.; Vuckovic, A. Brain Networks With Modified Connectivity in Patients With Neuropathic Pain and Spinal Cord Injury. Clin. EEG Neurosci. 2021, 55, 88–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nogay, H.S.; Adeli, H. Multiple Classification of Brain MRI Autism Spectrum Disorder by Age and Gender Using Deep Learning. J. Med Syst. 2024, 48, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rajalakshmi, A.; Sridhar, S. Investigate the Effect of Yoga and Meditation Using a Brain-Computer Interface Device. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, 2024. 12(5s): p. 68-77.
- Vujic, A.; Nisal, S.; Maes, P. Joie: a Joy-based Brain-Computer Interface (BCI). in Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 2023.
- Shivani, N.; Jayachitra, J. An EEG-based Brain-Computer Interface for Stress Analysis. in 2023 Second International Conference on Electronics and Renewable Systems (ICEARS). 2023. IEEE.
- Arsalan, A.; Majid, M. A study on multi-class anxiety detection using wearable EEG headband. J. Ambient. Intell. Humaniz. Comput. 2021, 13, 5739–5749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lim, C.G.; Soh, C.P.; Lim, S.S.Y.; Fung, D.S.S.; Guan, C.; Lee, T.-S. Home-based brain–computer interface attention training program for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a feasibility trial. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry Ment. Heal. 2023, 17, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Alexopoulou, A.; Batsou, A. Digital technologies for students with ADHD. International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 2023. 9(2): p. 537-547.
- Tan, Z.; Liu, Z.; Gong, S. Potential Attempt to Treat Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Children with Engineering Education Games. in International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. 2023. Springer.
- Alim, A.; Imtiaz, M.H. Automatic Identification of Children with ADHD from EEG Brain Waves. Signals 2023, 4, 193–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lai, Q.; et al. Study on the Tangible User Interface Jigsaw Puzzle for Curing ADHD/ADD Children. in International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. 2023. Springer.
- Prabhu, S.G.; et al. Real-Time Attention Monitoring Using Smart Wearable for ADHD Patients. in 2023 International Conference on Data Science and Network Security (ICDSNS). 2023. IEEE.
- Behboodi, A.; Lee, W.A.; Hinchberger, V.S.; Damiano, D.L. Determining optimal mobile neurofeedback methods for motor neurorehabilitation in children and adults with non-progressive neurological disorders: a scoping review. J. Neuroeng. Rehabilitation 2022, 19, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Machado, S.; Almada, L.F.; Annavarapu, R.N. Progress and prospects in EEG-based brain-computer interface: clinical applications in neurorehabilitation. Journal of Rehabilitation, 2013. 1(1): p. 29.
- Toki, E.I.; Tatsis, G.; Tatsis, V.A.; Plachouras, K.; Pange, J.; Tsoulos, I.G. Employing Classification Techniques on SmartSpeech Biometric Data towards Identification of Neurodevelopmental Disorders. Signals 2023, 4, 401–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Demarest, P.; Rustamov, N.; Swift, J.; Xie, T.; Adamek, M.; Cho, H.; Wilson, E.; Han, Z.; Belsten, A.; Luczak, N. A novel theta-controlled vibrotactile brain–computer interface to treat chronic pain: a pilot study. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 3433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lau-Zhu, A.; Lau, M.P.; McLoughlin, G. Mobile EEG in research on neurodevelopmental disorders: Opportunities and challenges. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 2019, 36, 100635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Smirnova, L.; Hartung, T. The Promise and Potential of Brain Organoids. Adv. Heal. Mater. 2024, e2302745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uma, M.; Sheela, T. Analysis of Collaborative Brain Computer Interface (BCI) based Personalized GUI for Differently Abled. Intell. Autom. Soft Comput. 2017, 24, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goetz, L.H.; Schork, N.J. Personalized medicine: motivation, challenges, and progress. Fertil. Steril. 2018, 109, 952–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Marzbani, H.; Marateb, H.R.; Mansourian, M. Methodological Note: Neurofeedback: A Comprehensive Review on System Design, Methodology and Clinical Applications. Basic Clin. Neurosci. J. 2016, 7, 143–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hammond, D.C. What is neurofeedback? Journal of neurotherapy, 2007. 10(4): p. 25-36.
- Filho, C.A.S.; Attux, R.; Castellano, G. Motor Imagery Neurofeedback: From System Conceptualization to Neural Correlates. Curr. Behav. Neurosci. Rep. 2024, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Chang, W.; Liang, K.; Chen, C.; Chen, H.; Chen, S.; Chan, P.S. The effects of neurofeedback training for children with cerebral palsy and co-occurring attention deficits: A pilot study. Child: Care, Heal. Dev. 2024, 50, e13231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bigoni, C.; Beanato, E.; Harquel, S.; Hervé, J.; Oflar, M.; Crema, A.; Espinosa, A.; Evangelista, G.G.; Koch, P.; Bonvin, C.; et al. Novel personalized treatment strategy for patients with chronic stroke with severe upper-extremity impairment: The first patient of the AVANCER trial. Med 2023, 4, 591–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Colucci, A.; et al. Brain–computer interface-controlled exoskeletons in clinical neurorehabilitation: ready or not? Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 2022. 36(12): p. 747-756.
- Kasula, B.Y. , Optimizing Healthcare Delivery: Machine Learning Applications and Innovations for Enhanced Patient Outcomes. International Journal of Creative Research In Computer Technology and Design, 2024. 6(6): p. 1-7.
- Sarella, P.N.K.; Mangam, V.T. AI-Driven Natural Language Processing in Healthcare: Transforming Patient-Provider Communication. Indian J. Pharm. Pr. 2024, 17, 21–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Friedrich, O.; Racine, E.; Steinert, S.; Pömsl, J.; Jox, R.J. An Analysis of the Impact of Brain-Computer Interfaces on Autonomy. Neuroethics 2018, 14, 17–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]


Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).