Submitted:
27 February 2024
Posted:
29 February 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
Mechanical Properties
Fluoride Release
Antibacterial Property
Aging Test
Cytotoxicity
Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy
3.2. Mechanical Properties
3.3. Fluoride Release
3.4. Antibacterial Property
3.5. Aging Test
3.5.1.Δ. E00 results
3.5.2. Microhardness
3.6. Cytotoxicity
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- L. Pizzolotto and R. R. Moraes. Resin Composites in Posterior Teeth: Clinical Performance and Direct Restorative Techniques [J]. Dent J (Basel), 2022, 10(12): 222. [CrossRef]
- A. Maletin, M. J. Knežević, DĐ Koprivica, et al. Dental Resin-Based Luting Materials-Review [J]. Polymers (Basel), 2023, 15(20): 4156. [CrossRef]
- M. K. Aldowsari, F. Alfawzan, A. Alhaidari, et al. Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Three Types of Adhesive Materials Used in the Restoration of Permanent Molars after Treatment with Silver Diamine Fluoride: An In Vitro Study [J]. Materials (Basel), 2023, 16(21): 6831. [CrossRef]
- G. Chladek, I. Barszczewska-Rybarek, M. Chrószcz-Porębska, et al. The effect of quaternary ammonium polyethylenimine nanoparticles on bacterial adherence, cytotoxicity, and physical and mechanical properties of experimental dental composites [J]. Sci Rep, 2023, 13(1): 17497. [CrossRef]
- T. A. Bakhsh, A. Alfaifi, Y. Alghamdi, et al. Thermal Sensing of Photo-Activated Dental Resin Composites Using Infrared Thermography [J]. Polymers (Basel), 2023, 15(20): 4117. [CrossRef]
- D. Eltahlah, C. D. Lynch, B. L. Chadwick, et al. An update on the reasons for placement and replacement of direct restorations [J]. J Dent, 2018, 72: 1-7. [CrossRef]
- N. J. Opdam, E. M. Bronkhorst, B. A. Loomans, et al. 12-year survival of composite vs. amalgam restorations [J]. J Dent Res, 2010, 89(10): 1063-7. [CrossRef]
- A. D. Loguercio, R. Ñaupari-Villasante, M. F. Gutierrez, et al. 5-year clinical performance of posterior bulk-filled resin composite restorations: A double-blind randomized controlled trial [J]. Dent Mater, 2023, 39(12): 1159-1168. [CrossRef]
- J. Kaur, D. Kapoor, D. Garg, et al. Evaluation of Microleakage of Dental Composites Using Bonding Agents with Different Placement Techniques: An Invitro Study [J]. J Clin Diagn Res, 2015, 9(9): Zc61-Zc64. [CrossRef]
- K. Hosaka, A. Tichy, M. Yamauti, et al. Digitally Guided Direct Composite Injection Technique with a Bi-layer Clear Mini-Index for the Management of Extensive Occlusal Caries in a Pediatric Patient: A Case Report [J]. J Adhes Dent, 2023, 25(1): 211-218. [CrossRef]
- Y. S. Kim, S. H. Baek, and R. J. Y. Kim. Effect of vibration during bulk and incremental filling on adaptation of a bulk-fill composite resin [J]. Sci Rep, 2022, 12(1): 21652. [CrossRef]
- A. Van Ende, J. De Munck, D. P. Lise, et al. Bulk-Fill Composites: A Review of the Current Literature [J]. J Adhes Dent, 2017, 19(2): 95-109. [CrossRef]
- S. Shibasaki, T. Takamizawa, K. Nojiri, et al. Polymerization Behavior and Mechanical Properties of High-Viscosity Bulk Fill and Low Shrinkage Resin Composites [J]. Oper Dent, 2017, 42(6): E177-E187. [CrossRef]
- C. A. Stewart and Y. Finer. Biostable, antidegradative and antimicrobial restorative systems based on host-biomaterials and microbial interactions [J]. Dent Mater, 2019, 35(1): 36-52. [CrossRef]
- H. Pollick. The Role of Fluoride in the Prevention of Tooth Decay [J]. Pediatr Clin North Am, 2018, 65(5): 923-940. [CrossRef]
- P. Francois, V. Fouquet, J. P. Attal, et al. Commercially Available Fluoride-Releasing Restorative Materials: A Review and a Proposal for Classification [J]. Materials (Basel), 2020, 13(10): 2313. [CrossRef]
- T. Z. Ei, Y. Shimada, S. Nakashima, et al. Comparison of resin-based and glass ionomer sealants with regard to fluoride-release and anti-demineralization efficacy on adjacent unsealed enamel [J]. Dent Mater J, 2018, 37(1): 104-112. [CrossRef]
- H. L. Van der Laan, S. L. Zajdowicz, K. Kuroda, et al. Biological and Mechanical Evaluation of Novel Prototype Dental Composites [J]. J Dent Res, 2019, 98(1): 91-97. [CrossRef]
- M. A. Melo, S. F. Guedes, H. H. Xu, et al. Nanotechnology-based restorative materials for dental caries management [J]. Trends Biotechnol, 2013, 31(8): 459-67. [CrossRef]
- Liyuan Zheng, Ke Li, Congqin Ning, et al. Study on antibacterial and fluoride-releasing properties of a novel composite resin with fluorine-doped nano-zirconia fillers [J]. Journal of Dentistry, 2021, 30(4): 218-224. [CrossRef]
- I. R. Hamilton. Effects of fluoride on enzymatic regulation of bacterial carbohydrate metabolism [J]. Caries Res, 1977, 11 Suppl 1: 262-291. [CrossRef]
- I. R. Hamilton and D. C. Ellwood. Effects of fluoride on carbohydrate metabolism by washed cells of Streptococcus mutans grown at various pH values in a chemostat [J]. Infect Immun, 1978, 19(2): 434-442. [CrossRef]
- A. Wiegand, W. Buchalla, and T. Attin. Review on fluoride-releasing restorative materials--fluoride release and uptake characteristics, antibacterial activity and influence on caries formation [J]. Dent Mater, 2007, 23(3): 343-362. [CrossRef]
- L. Wei Su, D. J. Lin, and J. Yen Uan. Novel dental resin composites containing LiAl-F layered double hydroxide (LDH) filler: Fluoride release/recharge, mechanical properties, color change, and cytotoxicity [J]. Dent Mater, 2019, 35(5): 663-672. [CrossRef]
- L. Cheng, X. Zhou, H. Zhong, et al. NaF-loaded core-shell PAN-PMMA nanofibers as reinforcements for Bis-GMA/TEGDMA restorative resins [J]. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 2014, 34: 262-269. [CrossRef]
- G. Hong, J. Yang, X. Jin, et al. Mechanical Properties of Nanohybrid Resin Composites Containing Various Mass Fractions of Modified Zirconia Particles [J]. Int J Nanomedicine, 2020, 15: 9891-9907. [CrossRef]
- David, A., Pacheco, et al. Adsorption of fluoride ion on the zirconium(IV) complexes of the chelating resins functionalized with amine-N-acetate ligands [J]. Separation Science and Technology, 2002, 37(4): 877-894. [CrossRef]
- L. H. Velazquez-Jimenez, R. H. Hurt, J. Matos, et al. Zirconium-carbon hybrid sorbent for removal of fluoride from water: oxalic acid mediated Zr(IV) assembly and adsorption mechanism [J]. Environ Sci Technol, 2014, 48(2): 1166-1174. [CrossRef]
- X. Xu, L. Ling, R. Wang, et al. Formulation and characterization of a novel fluoride-releasing dental composite [J]. Dent Mater, 2006, 22(11): 1014-1023. [CrossRef]
- S. D. Wolter, J. R. Piascik, and B. R. Stoner. Characterization of plasma fluorinated zirconia for dental applications by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy [J]. Applied Surface Science, 2011, 257(23): 10177-10182. [CrossRef]
- K. Hata, H. Ikeda, Y. Nagamatsu, et al. Dental Poly(methyl methacrylate)-Based Resin Containing a Nanoporous Silica Filler [J]. J Funct Biomater, 2022, 13(1): 32. [CrossRef]
- C. Goracci, M. Cadenaro, L. Fontanive, et al. Polymerization efficiency and flexural strength of low-stress restorative composites [J]. Dent Mater, 2014, 30(6): 688-694. [CrossRef]
- S. Naoum, E. Martin, and A. Ellakwa. Long-term fluoride exchanges at restoration surfaces and effects on surface mechanical properties [J]. ISRN Dent, 2013, 2013: 579039. [CrossRef]
- S. Paul, A. Raina, S. Kour, et al. Comparative evaluation of fluoride release and re-release and recharge potential of Zirconomer Improved and Cention [J]. J Conserv Dent, 2020, 23(4): 402-406. [CrossRef]
- Ahmed, Naseer, Zafar, et al. Therapeutic roles of fluoride released from restorative dental materials [J]. Fluoride, 2015.
- R. E. Marquis. Antimicrobial actions of fluoride for oral bacteria [J]. Can J Microbiol, 1995, 41(11): 955-964. [CrossRef]
- M. C. Serra and J. A. Cury. The in vitro effect of glass-ionomer cement restoration on enamel subjected to a demineralization and remineralization model [J]. Quintessence Int, 1992, 23(2): 143-147.
- J. A. Cury, B. H. de Oliveira, A. P. dos Santos, et al. Are fluoride releasing dental materials clinically effective on caries control? [J]. Dent Mater, 2016, 32(3): 323-333. [CrossRef]
- S. L. Zhou, J. Zhou, S. Watanabe, et al. In vitro study of the effects of fluoride-releasing dental materials on remineralization in an enamel erosion model [J]. J Dent, 2012, 40(3): 255-263. [CrossRef]
- A. Di Lauro, F. Di Duca, P. Montuori, et al. Fluoride and Calcium Release from Alkasite and Glass Ionomer Restorative Dental Materials: In Vitro Study [J]. J Funct Biomater, 2023, 14(2): 109. [CrossRef]
- A. Y. Harhash, ElSayad, II, and A. G. S. Zaghloul. A comparative in vitro study on fluoride release and water sorption of different flowable esthetic restorative materials [J]. Eur J Dent, 2017, 11(2): 174-179. [CrossRef]
- B. Behrend and W. Geurtsen. Long-term effects of four extraction media on the fluoride release from four polyacid-modified composite resins (compomers) and one resin-modified glass-ionomer cement [J]. J Biomed Mater Res, 2001, 58(6): 631-637. [CrossRef]
- E. Sungurtekin-Ekci, D. Ozdemir-Ozenen, S. Duman, et al. Antibacterial surface properties of various fluoride-releasing restorative materials in vitro [J]. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater, 2015, 13(2): e169-e173. [CrossRef]
- G. M. Whitford, G. S. Schuster, D. H. Pashley, et al. Fluoride uptake by Streptococcus mutans 6715 [J]. Infect Immun, 1977, 18(3): 680-687. [CrossRef]
- H. Y. Gonder and M. Fidan. Effect of different polymerization times on color change, translucency parameter, and surface hardness of bulk-fill resin composites [J]. Niger J Clin Pract, 2022, 25(10): 1751-1757. [CrossRef]
- R. D. Paravina, R. Ghinea, L. J. Herrera, et al. Color difference thresholds in dentistry [J]. J Esthet Restor Dent, 2015, 27 Suppl 1: S1-9. [CrossRef]
- M. Fidan and Ö Yağci. Effect of aging and fiber-reinforcement on color stability, translucency, and microhardness of single-shade resin composites versus multi-shade resin composite [J]. J Esthet Restor Dent, 2023: 13125. [CrossRef]
- R. D. Jiang, H. Lin, G. Zheng, et al. In vitro dentin barrier cytotoxicity testing of some dental restorative materials [J]. J Dent, 2017, 58: 28-33. [CrossRef]
- T. R. Schneider, R. Hakami-Tafreshi, A. Tomasino-Perez, et al. Effects of dental composite resin monomers on dental pulp cells [J]. Dent Mater J, 2019, 38(4): 579-583. [CrossRef]
- C. Hadjichristou, E. Papachristou, I. Bonovolias, et al. Three-dimensional tissue engineering-based Dentin/Pulp tissue analogue as advanced biocompatibility evaluation tool of dental restorative materials [J]. Dent Mater, 2020, 36(2): 229-248. [CrossRef]





| Groups | Flexure Strength (Mean ± SD, MPa) |
Height Loss After Wear Resistance Test (mean ± SD, um) |
|---|---|---|
| Control group | 88 ± 5.21a | 161 ± 38.84a |
| 25 wt% F-zirconia fillers | 82 ± 5.75a | 115 ± 24.25a,b |
| 50 wt% F-zirconia fillers | 85 ± 4.84a | 60 ± 26.23b |
| Time | Groups | Distilled Water Mean (SD) |
Neutral Buffer Mean (SD) |
Acidic Buffer Mean (SD) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 1 | 25 wt% F-zirconia fillers | 1.51(0.09)1a | 1.51(0.07)1a | 1.52(0.20)1a |
| 50 wt% F-zirconia fillers | 1.77(0.03)1a | 1.72(0.06)1b | 1.83(0.21)1a | |
| Day 3 | 25 wt% F-zirconia fillers | 1.25(0.01)1a | 1.25(0.03)1a | 1.36(0.13)1a |
| 50 wt% F-zirconia fillers | 1.53(0.02)1a | 1.44(0.04)1b | 1.57(0.28)1a | |
| Day 7 | 25 wt% F-zirconia fillers | 1.31(0.10)1a | 1.25(0.01)1a | 1.38(0.12)1a |
| 50 wt% F-zirconia fillers | 1.43(0.03)1a | 1.42(0.02)1b | 1.60(0.20)1a | |
| Day 14 | 25 wt% F-zirconia fillers | 0.36(0.00)1a | 0.36(0.01)1a | 0.40(0.05)1a |
| 50 wt% F-zirconia fillers | 0.47(0.01)1b | 0.45(0.02)1b | 0.52(0.72)1b | |
| Day 28 | 25 wt% F-zirconia fillers | 0.26(0.02)1a | 0.21(0.01)2a | 0.23(0.00)3a |
| 50 wt% F-zirconia fillers | 0.29(0.01)1a | 0.23(0.02)2b | 0.32(0.03)1b |
| Group | CIELab Value (Mean ± SD) | ΔE00 Value (Mean ± SD) |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| T0 | T1 | |||
| Control group | L* | 38.28 ± 3.191a | 39.67 ± 3.001a | 1.69 ± 0.35a |
| a* | -1.04 ± 0.121a | -1.24 ± 0.071a | ||
| b* | 7.03 ± 0.971a | 6.04 ± 0.641a | ||
| 25 wt% F-zirconia fillers | L* | 42.30 ± 2.031b | 43.20 ± 3.181a,b | 1.20 ± 0.17b |
| a* | 1.52 ± 1.531b | 1.84 ± 1.981b | ||
| b* | 11.83 ± 6.081b | 12.38 ± 6.791b | ||
| 50 wt% F-zirconia fillers | L* | 45.28 ± 5.231b | 45.63 ± 5.191b | 0.78 ± 0.44b |
| a* | 1.77 ± 1.181b | 1.74 ± 1.172b | ||
| b* | 11.91 ± 4.581b | 11.44 ± 4.501b | ||
| Group | Microhardness value (mean ± SD, HV0.1) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| T0 | T1 | T0-T1 | |
| Control group | 18.30 ± 1.251a | 14.61 ± 0.971a | 3.69 ± 0.58a |
| 25 wt% F-zirconia fillers | 48.50 ± 10.491b | 44.38 ± 9.311b | 4.36 ± 1.83a |
| 50 wt% F-zirconia fillers | 73.72 ± 5.641c | 71.02 ± 3.561c | 2.69 ± 2.93a |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).