Submitted:
17 February 2024
Posted:
20 February 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Sampling of Residual Biomass.
2.2. Sugarcane Bagasse Is the Primary Pretreatment. Biomass Characterization Techniques
2.3. Biomass Characterization Techniques
2.3.1. Proximal Analysis
2.3.2. Ultimate Analysis.
2.3.3. Structural Analysis.
2.4. Hydrothermal Treatment of Biomass.
2.4.1. Aqueous Phase.
2.4.1. Solid Phase (Hydrochar).
3. Results
3.1. Biomass Characterization
3.1.1. Proximal Analysis
3.1.2. Ultimate Analysis.
3.1.3. Structural Analysis.
3.2. Hydrothermal Treatment of Biomass.
2.4.1. Aqueous Phase.
The Experiments Included Conductivity Monitoring, pH Measurement, and Particle Size Variation.
Experiments with B:W Ratio Variation, pH, and Conductivity Monitoring.
Quantification of Platform Chemicals
2.4.1. Solid Phase (Hydrochar).
Infrared Spectroscopy
The Morphology of the Samples Microscopically.
Elemental Analysis.
| Experiment number | % | O/C | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | O | N | Other | conversion by weight of solid product | ||
| Biomass | 44.22 | 45.56 | 0.292 | 1.030 | ||
| 1 | 68.605 | 25.655 | 5.140 | Si=0.39; F=0.21 | 49.592 | 0.375 |
| 2 | 70.255 | 20.335 | 68.605 | Si=4.76 | 59.132 | 0.297 |
| 3 | 61.965 | 33.165 | 4.420 | F=0.45 | 52.921 | 0.536 |
| 4 | 77.565 | 15.975 | 6.465 | 72.187 | 0.206 | |
| 5 | 68.520 | 25.890 | 5.465 | Si=0.12 | 56.712 | 0.380 |
| 6 | 74.920 | 10.730 | 3.650 | 58.490 | 0.142 | |
| 7 | 64.110 | 27.330 | 9.235 | 65.860 | 0.426 | |
| 8 | 74.310 | 19.540 | 6.150 | 85.851 | 0.263 | |
| 9 | 67.540 | 27.345 | 5.115 | 51.196 | 0.405 | |
| 10 | 74.180 | 19.570 | 6.250 | 62.759 | 0.264 | |
| 11 | 63.200 | 31.825 | 4.985 | 57.454 | 0.504 | |
| 12 | 75.865 | 17.910 | 6.225 | 74.213 | 0.236 | |
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- FINAGRO, “Crecimiento del sector agropecuario y AgroExpo 2023, un reto hacia el desarrollo del campo | Finagro.” Accessed: Dec. 07, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.finagro.com.co/noticias/articulos/crecimiento-del-sector-agropecuario-agroexpo-2023-reto-desarrollo-del-campo-0.
- DANE, “Boletín Encuesta Nacional Agropecuaria 2019,” DANE.
- DANE, “DANE - PIB Información técnica,” DANE. Accessed: Dec. 07, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.dane.gov.co/index.php/estadisticas-por-tema/cuentas-nacionales/cuentas-nacionales-trimestrales/pib-informacion-tecnica.
- DANE, “Boletín mensual INSUMOS Y FACTORES ASOCIADOS A LA PRODUCCIÓN AGROPECUARIA,” 2020. Accessed: Nov. 06, 2021. [Online]. Available: http://www.agronet.gov.co/.
- DANE, “Un camino para la inclusión, la equidad y el reconocimiento.” Accessed: Dec. 08, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.mineducacion.gov.co/1759/articles-362822_recurso.pdf.
- J. Felipe and L. Bustamante, “LA CAÑA DE AZUCAR (Saccharum officinarum) PARA LA PRODUCCIÓN DE PANELA. CASO: NORDESTE DEL DEPARTAMENTO DE ANTIOQUIA,” 2015.
- Minagricultura, “Cadena Agroindustrial de la panela,” Colombia, 2019. Accessed: Jan. 02, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://sioc.minagricultura.gov.co/Panela/Documentos/2019-12-30 Cifras Sectoriales.pdf.
- H. S. Kambo and A. Dutta, “A comparative review of biochar and hydrochar in terms of production, physico-chemical properties and applications,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 45, pp. 359–378, May 2015. [CrossRef]
- A. A. Peterson, F. Vogel, R. P. Lachance, M. Fröling, M. J. Antal, Jr., and J. W. Tester, “Thermochemical biofuel production in hydrothermal media: A review of sub- and supercritical water technologies,” Energy Environ Sci, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 32, Jul. 2008. [CrossRef]
- Y. Shen, “A review on hydrothermal carbonization of biomass and plastic wastes to energy products,” Biomass Bioenergy, vol. 134, p. 105479, Mar. 2020. [CrossRef]
- X. Zhuang et al., “Insights into the evolution of chemical structures in lignocellulose and non-lignocellulose biowastes during hydrothermal carbonization (HTC),” Fuel, vol. 236, pp. 960–974, Jan. 2019. [CrossRef]
- C. J. Coronella, J. G. Lynam, M. T. Reza, and M. H. Uddin, “Hydrothermal Carbonization of Lignocellulosic Biomass,” pp. 275–311, 2014. [CrossRef]
- M. Heidari, A. Dutta, B. Acharya, and S. Mahmud, “A review of the current knowledge and challenges of hydrothermal carbonization for biomass conversion,” Journal of the Energy Institute, vol. 92, no. 6, pp. 1779–1799, Dec. 2019. [CrossRef]
- T. A. H. Nguyen, T. H. Bui, W. S. Guo, and H. H. Ngo, “Valorization of the aqueous phase from hydrothermal carbonization of different feedstocks: Challenges and perspectives,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 472, p. 144802, Sep. 2023. [CrossRef]
- J. Fang, L. Zhan, Y. S. Ok, and B. Gao, “Minireview of potential applications of hydrochar derived from hydrothermal carbonization of biomass,” Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, vol. 57, pp. 15–21, Jan. 2018. [CrossRef]
- A. Rehman et al., “A focused review on lignocellulosic biomass-derived porous carbons for effective pharmaceuticals removal: Current trends, challenges and future prospects,” Sep Purif Technol, vol. 330, p. 125356, Feb. 2024. [CrossRef]
- A. O. Onokwai, E. S. A. Ajisegiri, I. P. Okokpujie, R. A. Ibikunle, M. Oki, and J. O. Dirisu, “Characterization of lignocellulose biomass based on proximate, ultimate, structural composition, and thermal analysis,” Mater Today Proc, vol. 65, pp. 2156–2162, 2022. [CrossRef]
- E. M. A. Edreis, G. Luo, and H. Yao, “Investigations of the structure and thermal kinetic analysis of sugarcane bagasse char during non-isothermal CO2 gasification,” J Anal Appl Pyrolysis, vol. 107, pp. 107–115, May 2014. [CrossRef]
- A. A. Castro Vega, “Estudio de la naturaleza química de biocrudos obtenidos mediante licuefacción hidrotérmica de biomasa lignocelulósica,” 2011. Accessed: Dec. 08, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/8651.
- A. A. Vega Castro, L. I. Rodríguez Varela, and J. Díaz Velásquez, “Subcritical hydrothermal conversion of organic wastes and biomass. Reaction pathways,” ABRIL DE, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 41–50, 2007.
- C. Qian, Q. Li, Z. Zhang, X. Wang, J. Hu, and W. Cao, “Prediction of higher heating values of biochar from proximate and ultimate analysis,” Fuel, vol. 265, p. 116925, Apr. 2020. [CrossRef]
- A. O. Ayeni, O. A. Adeeyo, O. M. Oresegun, and T. E. Oladimeji, “Compositional analysis of lignocellulosic materials: Evaluation of an economically viable method suitable for woody and non-woody biomass,” American Journal of Engineering Research, 2015, Accessed: Jan. 14, 2024. [Online]. Available: www.ajer.org.
- P. Zhang, W. Liao, A. Kumar, Q. Zhang, and H. Ma, “Characterization of sugarcane bagasse ash as a potential supplementary cementitious material: Comparison with coal combustion fly ash,” J Clean Prod, vol. 277, p. 123834, Dec. 2020. [CrossRef]
- R. Khatami, C. Stivers, K. Joshi, Y. A. Levendis, and A. F. Sarofim, “Combustion behavior of single particles from three different coal ranks and from sugar cane bagasse in O2/N2 and O2/CO2 atmospheres,” Combust Flame, vol. 159, no. 3, pp. 1253–1271, Mar. 2012. [CrossRef]
- A. O. Onokwai, I. P. Okokpujie, E. S. Ajisegiri, M. Oki, A. O. Adeoyeb, and E. T. Akinlabi, “Characterization of Lignocellulosic Biomass Samples in Omu-Aran Metropolis, Kwara State, Nigeria, as Potential Fuel for Pyrolysis Yields,” International Journal of Renewable Energy Development, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 973–981, Nov. 2022. [CrossRef]
- G. Hincapié, A. Soto, and D. López, ‘Pre-tratamiento ácido y básico de bagazo de caña y de compuestos modelo para la producción de bio-aceite vía licuefacción hidrotérmica,’ Energética, vol. 47, pp. 23–30, Jan. 2016, Accessed: Jan. 14, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/64263.
- S. Yao, S. Nie, Y. Yuan, S. Wang, and C. Qin, “Efficient extraction of bagasse hemicelluloses and characterization of solid remainder,” Bioresour Technol, vol. 185, pp. 21–27, Jun. 2015. [CrossRef]
- D. Wüst, C. R. Correa, D. Jung, M. Zimmermann, A. Kruse, and L. Fiori, “Understanding the influence of biomass particle size and reaction medium on the formation pathways of hydrochar,” Biomass Convers Biorefin, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1357–1380, Dec. 2020. [CrossRef]
- M. Heidari, S. Salaudeen, A. Dutta, and B. Acharya, “Effects of Process Water Recycling and Particle Sizes on Hydrothermal Carbonization of Biomass,” Energy & Fuels, vol. 32, no. 11, pp. 11576–11586, Nov. 2018. [CrossRef]
- Y. Zhou, J. Remón, X. Pang, Z. Jiang, H. Liu, and W. Ding, “Hydrothermal conversion of biomass to fuels, chemicals and materials: A review holistically connecting product properties and marketable applications,” Science of The Total Environment, vol. 886, p. 163920, Aug. 2023. [CrossRef]
- M. Usman et al., “Characterization and utilization of aqueous products from hydrothermal conversion of biomass for bio-oil and hydro-char production: a review,” Green Chemistry, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 1553–1572, Apr. 2019. [CrossRef]
- Y. Zhou, M. Li, Y. Chen, and C. Hu, “Conversion of polysaccharides in Ulva prolifera to valuable chemicals in the presence of formic acid,” J Appl Phycol, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 101–110, Feb. 2021. [CrossRef]
- K. Krysanova, A. Krylova, M. Kulikova, A. Kulikov, and O. Rusakova, “Biochar characteristics produced via hydrothermal carbonization and torrefaction of peat and sawdust,” Fuel, vol. 328, p. 125220, Nov. 2022. [CrossRef]
- R. Zhu and V. Yadama, “Effects of hot water extraction pretreatment on physicochemical changes of Douglas fir,” Biomass Bioenergy, vol. 90, pp. 78–89, Jul. 2016. [CrossRef]
- T. M. Sabry, S. A. E.-H. El-Korashy, H. E. S. Jahin, G. M. Khairy, and N. F. A. Aal, “Hydrothermal carbonization of Calotropis procera leaves as a biomass: Preparation and characterization,” J Mol Struct, vol. 1302, p. 137397, Apr. 2024. [CrossRef]
- M. Sevilla and A. B. Fuertes, “The production of carbon materials by hydrothermal carbonization of cellulose,” Carbon N Y, vol. 47, no. 9, pp. 2281–2289, Aug. 2009. [CrossRef]
- Y. H. Ju, L. H. Huynh, N. S. Kasim, T. J. Guo, J. H. Wang, and A. E. Fazary, “Analysis of soluble and insoluble fractions of alkali and subcritical water treated sugarcane bagasse,” Carbohydr Polym, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 591–599, Jan. 2011. [CrossRef]
- D. A. Iryani, S. Kumagai, M. Nonaka, K. Sasaki, and T. Hirajima, “Characterization and Production of Solid Biofuel from Sugarcane Bagasse by Hydrothermal Carbonization,” Waste Biomass Valorization, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 1941–1951, Sep. 2017. [CrossRef]
- L. Mendoza Martinez et al., “Hydrothermal carbonization of lignocellulosic agro-forest based biomass residues,” Biomass Bioenergy, vol. 147, p. 106004, Apr. 2021. [CrossRef]
- K. O. Iwuozor, E. Chizitere Emenike, J. O. Ighalo, F. O. Omoarukhe, P. E. Omuku, and A. George Adeniyi, “A Review on the thermochemical conversion of sugarcane bagasse into biochar,” Cleaner Materials, vol. 6, p. 100162, Dec. 2022. [CrossRef]
- S. A. Nicolae et al., “Recent advances in hydrothermal carbonisation: from tailored carbon materials and biochemicals to applications and bioenergy,” Green Chemistry, vol. 22, no. 15, pp. 4747–4800, Aug. 2020. [CrossRef]
- M. Sevilla and A. B. Fuertes, “The production of carbon materials by hydrothermal carbonization of cellulose,” Carbon N Y, vol. 47, no. 9, pp. 2281–2289, Aug. 2009. [CrossRef]






| Experiment | Temperature (°C) |
Biomass water ratio B:W |
Particle size (µm) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 220 | 1:10 | 106 |
| 2 | 260 | 1:10 | 106 |
| 3 | 220 | 1:50 | 106 |
| 4 | 260 | 1:50 | 106 |
| 5 | 220 | 1:10 | 212 |
| 6 | 260 | 1:10 | 212 |
| 7 | 220 | 1:50 | 212 |
| 8 | 260 | 1:50 | 212 |
| 9 | 220 | 1:10 | 600 |
| 10 | 260 | 1:10 | 600 |
| 11 | 220 | 1:50 | 600 |
| 12 | 260 | 1:50 | 600 |
| Ref. | Biomass | % Moisture | % ash | % volatile matter | % fixed carbon |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample | Sugar cane bagasse 1 | 7.910 ±0,072 | 1.556 ±0.017 | 80.932 ±0.0883 | 9.601 |
| [17] | Sugarcane straw 2 | 0.90 | 9.60 | 77.25 | 13.31 |
| [18] | Sugar cane bagasse 2 | 7.32 | 4.76 | 83 | 12.9 |
| [19] | Pennisetum pasture 2 | 8.17 | 10.73 | 73.44 | 15.83 |
| Ref. | Biomass | % C | % H | % N | % O | % S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample | Sugar cane bagasse 1 | 45.22 | 5.94 | 0.292 | 48.56 | 0 |
| [17] | Sugarcane straw 2 | 44.80 | 5.94 | 0.10 | 48.89 | 0.27 |
| [24] | Sugar cane bagasse 2 | 46.2 | 5.9 | 0.21 | 47.5 | - |
| [25] | Rice shell 2 | 40.82 | 5.25 | 0.38 | 53.38 | 0.17 |
| Ref. | Biomass | % Cellulose | % Hemicellulose | % Lignin | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample | Sugar cane bagasse 1 | 61,4 | 23,6 | 8,1 | |
| [26] | Sugarcane straw 2 | 50,81 | 20,36 | 9,18 | |
| [27] | Sugar cane bagasse 2 | 45,28 | 22,13 | 22,39 | |
| [22] | Sugar cane bagasse 2 | 35,28 | 33,25 | 25,20 |
| Experiment number | Concentration (g/L) | % | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carbohydrates | Acid formic | Acid levulinic | HMF | Furfural | Total yield | |
| 1 | 0.6850 | 4.8543 | 9.3065 | 2.0148 | 2.5470 | 18.2532 |
| 2 | 0.3347 | 6.3264 | 9.4135 | 0.0072 | 0 | 15.6537 |
| 3 | 0.1152 | 1.2740 | 0.5979 | 0.5593 | 0.6614 | 15.8803 |
| 4 | 0.1480 | 2.7241 | 0.7802 | 0 | 0 | 17.7287 |
| 5 | 0.3169 | 8.3482 | 3.6359 | 1.2773 | 0.9412 | 13.9262 |
| 6 | 0.3474 | 7.8943 | 3.8389 | 0 | 0 | 12.0824 |
| 7 | 0.2322 | 2.9918 | 0.7580 | 0.9709 | 0.8844 | 31.0724 |
| 8 | 0.1577 | 4.1887 | 0.9833 | 0.0255 | 0 | 13.4627 |
| 9 | 0.8202 | 6.0492 | 3.5317 | 3.0513 | 2.6003 | 14.0281 |
| 10 | 0.3012 | 7.9202 | 3.9615 | 0 | 0.7051 | 12.2470 |
| 11 | 0.2225 | 1.6576 | 0.7177 | 0.8120 | 0.7139 | 19.8568 |
| 12 | 0.0693 | 2.3093 | 0.7919 | 0.0000 | 00000 | 15.6082 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).