Submitted:
02 February 2024
Posted:
19 February 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction and contextual background
- How can we create effective plans, programs, and policies to support and grow entrepreneurship in economies based on natural resources? How does this differ from what we have learned in earlier studies?
- What should be included in a clear plan for implementing the entrepreneurship framework in these resource-based economies? How can we make sure this plan is well-organized for successful implementation?
- What are the expected results of applying the entrepreneurship framework in resource-based economies, and how can we measure its success to ensure the policies and programs are working?
2. Literature review and theoretical framework
2.1. Government Policies
2.2. Cultural and Social Factors
2.3. Access to Financial support and incubation
2.4. Innovation, Technology, and Digitization
2.5. Educational Initiatives and Human Capital Development
2.6. Role of Networks and Collaboration
2.7. Global Entrepreneurship
3. Methodology
3.1. Explanatory research approach
- Government Policies: Policies for business growth, innovation, effectiveness, and impact on economic diversification.
- Cultural and Social Factors: Exploring the influence of historical and modern socio-cultural dynamics on entrepreneurship, including youth perceptions and individual traits.
- Access to Financial Support and Incubation: Assessing the role of financial support, including Islamic finance and government programs, and the impact of incubators and accelerators.
- Innovation, Technology, and Digitization: Innovation in critical sectors and the strategic integration of technology in entrepreneurship, focusing on regulatory frameworks and workforce readiness.
- Educational Initiatives and Human Capital Development: The significance of entrepreneurship education in fostering innovation and its alignment with national development goals, including the role of universities.
- Role of Networks and Collaboration: Examining the importance of various networks and collaborations in providing resources and opportunities for entrepreneurs.
- Global Entrepreneurship: Investigating Qatar's role in the global entrepreneurial landscape, emphasizing international market dynamics and government support for global expansion.
3.2. Quantitative approach
3.3. Roadmap, implementation plan, and impact assessment
3.4. Description of survey preparation, planning, and conduction
3.5. Description of survey analysis
4. Results, analysis and discussion
4.1. Survey results and findings
4.1.1. Business experience and challenges:
4.1.2. Demographic Insights:
4.1.3. Drivers & Enablers:
4.1.4. Preferred financing method
4.1.5. Supporting agencies programs
4.2. Validation of the framework for Qatar Entrepreneurship Model (QEM)
4.3. Ent-Q: Country-wide entrepreneurship free zone
- Tax Incentives and Low Rents: Ent-Q startups will benefit from low-cost or free office and industrial space, reducing initial overheads and supporting business continuity.
- Tendering Support and Agency Services: Ent-Q plans to provide a quota for startups in open tenders and require local companies to purchase from these startups, aiding their growth and scalability. Additionally, startups will have access to services from all supporting agencies.
- Progressive Policies and Procedures: The zone will offer a streamlined, digital process for starting a business, distinct from the current complex system, along with regular monitoring to ensure compliance with laws and regulations.
- Innovative Financing Options: Multiple financing avenues, including grants, partnerships, and direct industry investments through the community service clause, will be available, with transparent selection criteria.
- Dedicated Committees, Mentorship, and Support: Commercial, legal, and technical committees will assist startups in disputes, and mentorship will be provided by pairing startups with industry experts.
- Investor-Relationship Section and Investment Platform: Ent-Q will feature a platform for investors to find suitable business and partnership opportunities, supplemented by a percentage of industrial companies' income tax for investment and a committee-managed fund for unspecified investors requirements.

4.4. Ryadah: online platform for all business processes under Ent-Q
- 1)
- Comprehensive Government and Banking Integration: Ryadah will facilitate online processing for government-related activities (registrations, renewals, visas, tax cards) and integrate banking services for loan applications, monetary changes, and salary transfers. It also includes a secure e-check system for payments and legal follow-up for non-payment cases.
- 2)
- Financial Management and Notifications: The platform will allow for the payment of various company bills (utilities, salaries, fees, taxes, rents) and provide timely notifications, reminders, and alerts for important deadlines, legal document expirations, new tenders, and payments.
- 3)
- Business Information and Operational Services: Ryadah will serve as a repository for crucial business data (market size, new companies, average salaries) and provide operational services like transferring sponsorship, exit permits, and service requests.
- 4)
- Agency Services and Tendering Interface: It will offer various agency-related services (courses, funding, accounting, investor relations, events) through a single interface, focusing on service availability rather than provider identity. Additionally, there will be a tendering interface for application and participation in tenders, with government oversight to support local startups.
- 5)
- Educational Resources: The platform will include tutorials, FAQs, and online support to assist entrepreneurs in navigating and utilizing the platform effectively.

4.5. Recommendations, Roadmap, and Impact Analysis
4.5.1. Recommendations for Government:
4.5.2. Recommendations for Supporting Agencies:
4.5.3. Recommendations for Entrepreneurs and the Business Sector:
5. Conclusions, limitations, and recommendations for future research
- Integrate Entrepreneurship into Education
- Increase Access to Business Information
- Simplify Policies and Procedures
- Develop the Legal System
- Establish ENTQ Free zone
- Establish Ryadah
- Clarity in Financing Criteria
- Select Committee Members Wisely
- Enhance Networking Events
- Apply non-disclosure agreements (NDAs)
- Provide Tailored Mentoring and Training
- Leverage Connections/Networks
- Utilize Family Experience
- Align Business with Passion and Expertise
- Implementation of lean concept
- Help develop and train experts
- Develop entrepreneurship culture
Supplementary Materials
References
- Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2020, 2020.
- ACCESS TO CAPITAL for Access to Capital for Entrepreneurs: Removing Barriers, (2019).
- World Bank SME Finance, (n.d.). https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/smefinance (accessed December 30, 2023).
- M.I. Al-Housani, M. Koç, M.S. Al-Sada, Investigations on Entrepreneurship Needs, Challenges, and Models for Countries in Transition to Sustainable Development from Resource-Based Economy—Qatar as a Case, Sustainability 2023, Vol. 15, Page 7537 15 (2023) 7537. [CrossRef]
- Creswell JW, Creswell JD, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches., (n.d.).
- Z.J. Acs, E. Stam, D.B. Audretsch, A. O’Connor, The Lineages of the Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Approach, Small Business Economics 49 (2017). [CrossRef]
- E. Stam, A. van de Ven, Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Elements, Small Business Economics 53 (2019).
- E. Autio, S. Nambisan, L.D.W. Thomas, M. Wright, Digital Affordances, Spatial Affordances, and the Genesis of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 12 (2018). [CrossRef]
- M. Wright, D.S. Siegel, P. Mustar, An Emerging Ecosystem for Student Start-Ups, Journal of Technology Transfer 42 (2017). [CrossRef]
- General Secretarian For Development Planning, Qatar national Vision 2030, Doha, 2008. www.planning.gov.qa.
- Qatar Development Bank, Qatar Development Bank Annual Report, 2018.
- Qatar Science, T. Park, Qatar Science and Technology Park: Annual Report, (2017).
- D.B. Audretsch, I. Grilo, A.R. Thurik, Explaining Entrepreneurship and the Role of Policy: A Framework, in: Handbook of Research on Entrepreneurship Policy, 2007.
- M. Mazzucato, C.C.R. Penna, The Brazilian Innovation System: A Mission-Oriented Policy Proposal, (2016).
- S.A. Alvarez, J.B. Barney, A.M. Newman, The poverty problem and the industrialization solution, Asia Pacific Journal of Management 32 (2015). [CrossRef]
- Z.J. Acs, J.E. Amorós, Entrepreneurship and Competitiveness Dynamics in Latin America, Small Business Economics 49 (2008). [CrossRef]
- M. Wright, I. Stigliani, Entrepreneurship and Growth, International Small Business Journal 31 (2013).
- Y. Jiang, M.W. Peng, X. Yang, C.C. Mutlu, Family Firms and Entrepreneurial Orientation in Publicly Traded Firms: A Comparative Analysis of the S&P 500, Family Business Review 31 (2009).
- R. Basco, I. Bartkeviciute, Family Business and Regional Development—A Theoretical Model of Regional Familiness, Journal of Family Business Strategy 11 (2015).
- H.E. Aldrich, J.E. Cliff, The Pervasive Effects of Family on Entrepreneurship: Toward a Family Embeddedness Perspective, J Bus Ventur 18 (2003). [CrossRef]
- M. Obschonka, M. Stuetzer, Integrating Psychological Approaches to Entrepreneurship: The Entrepreneurial Personality System (EPS), Small Business Economics 49 (2017). [CrossRef]
- J. Levie, E. Autio, Management of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems, International Small Business Journal (2017).
- V.K. Gupta, D.B. Turban, S.A. Wasti, A. Sikdar, The Role of Gender Stereotypes in Perceptions of Entrepreneurs and Intentions to Become an Entrepreneur, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (2009). [CrossRef]
- M. Schindehutte, M.H. Morris, Advancing Strategic Entrepreneurship Research: The Role of Complexity Science in Shifting the Paradigm, (2009). [CrossRef]
- El Tiby, Amr Mohamed, Grais Wafik, Islamic Finance and Economic Development: Risk, Regulation, and Corporate Governance, Wiley, 2015.
- C. Mason, R. Harrison, Business Angel Investment Activity in the Financial Crisis: UK Evidence and Policy Implications, Environ Plann C Gov Policy (2014). [CrossRef]
- C. Pauwels, B. Clarysse, M. Wright, J. Van Hove, Understanding a New Generation Incubation Model: The Accelerator, Technovation 50 (2016). [CrossRef]
- J.P. Hausberg, S. Korreck, Business incubators and accelerators: a co-citation analysis-based, systematic literature review, Journal of Technology Transfer 45 (2020). [CrossRef]
- S.A. Zahra, M. Wright, Understanding the Social Role of Entrepreneurship, Journal of Management Studies 53 (2016). [CrossRef]
- M. Wright, I. Stigliani, Entrepreneurship and Growth, International Small Business Journal (2012).
- E. Autio, H. Rannikko, Retaining Winners: Can Policy Boost High-Growth Entrepreneurship?, Res Policy 45 (2016) 42–55. [CrossRef]
- G. Nabi, F. Liñán, A. Fayolle, N. Krueger, A. Walmsley, The Impact of Entrepreneurship Education in Higher Education: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda, Academy of Management Learning & Education 16 (2017). [CrossRef]
- Fayolle, Personal Views on the Future of Entrepreneurship Education, Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 30 (2018).
- L. Pittaway, J. Cope, Entrepreneurship Education: A Systematic Review of the Evidence, International Small Business Journal 25 (2007).
- B. Colin Mason, R. Brown, ENTREPRENEURIAL ECOSYSTEMS AND GROWTH ORIENTED ENTREPRENEURSHIP, (n.d.).
- D.S. Siegel, M. Wright, Academic Entrepreneurship: Time for a Rethink?, British Journal of Management 26 (2015). [CrossRef]
- M. Guerrero, J.A. Cunningham, D. Urbano, Economic Impact of Entrepreneurial Universities’ Activities: An Exploratory Study of the United Kingdom, Res Policy (2010). [CrossRef]
- H. Etzkowitz, The triple helix : university-industry-government innovation in action, (2008).
- I. Prodan, M. Drnovsek, Conceptualizing Academic-Entrepreneurial Intentions: An Empirical Test, Technovation 64–65 (2017).
- E. Stam, Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Regional Policy: A Sympathetic Critique, Eur. Plan. Stud. 23 (2015). [CrossRef]
- B. Honig, P. Davidsson, THE ROLE OF SOCIAL AND HUMAN CAPITAL AMONG NASCENT ENTREPRENEURS., Academy of Management Proceedings 2000 (2000) B1–B6. [CrossRef]
- E. Autio, S. Nambisan, L.D.W. Thomas, M. Wright, Digital Affordances, Spatial Affordances, and the Genesis of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems, Strateg. Entrep. J. 12 (2018).
- S. Nambisan, D. Siegel, M. Kenney, On open innovation, platforms, and entrepreneurship, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 12 (2018) 354–368. [CrossRef]
- Drori, B. Honig, M. Wright, Transnational Entrepreneurship: An Emergent Field of Study, Entrep. Theory Pract. 31 (2016). [CrossRef]
- S. Terjesen, J. Hessels, D. Li, Comparative International Entrepreneurship: A Review and Research Agenda, J. Manag. 42 (2016).
- S.A. Zahra, M. Wright, Understanding the Social Role of Entrepreneurship, J. Manag. Stud. 53 (2016) 610–629. [CrossRef]
- S.T. Cavusgil, G. Knight, The Born Global Firm: An Entrepreneurial and Capabilities Perspective on Early and Rapid Internationalization, J. Int. Bus. Stud. 46 (2015) 3–16. [CrossRef]
- G. Knight, P.W. Liesch, Internationalization: From Incremental to Born Global, J. World Bus. 51 (2016) 93–102. [CrossRef]
- L.P. Dana, H. Etemad, R.W. Wright, Toward a Paradigm of International Business: The Importance of Globalization, Int. Bus. Rev. 25 (2016) 905–916.
- N. Coviello, L. Kano, P.W. Liesch, Adapting the Uppsala Model to a Modern World: Macro-context and Microfoundations, J. Int. Bus. Stud. 48 (2017) 1151–1164. [CrossRef]
- wildpixel, GEM 2020/2021, (2021). http://www.witchwoodhouse.com (accessed November 17, 2021).
- QDB, «Global Entrepreneurship Monitor», QDB (n.d.).
- QDB, Small and Medium Enterprise (SME) Toolkit, 2017. https://www.qdb.qa/en/Documents/QDB%20SME%20Toolkit%20-%2025%209%202017.pdf (accessed March 9, 2020).
- E. Yi Fong, M. Khata Bin Jabor, A. Halim Zulkifli, M. Riduam Hashim, Challenges Faced by New Entrepreneurs and Suggestions How to Overcome Them, 2020.
- T. Vignesh, G. Yoganandan, TOP FIVE CHALLENGES OF ENTREPRENEURS, n.d. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344352770.
- M. Al-Qahtani, M.F. Zguir, I. Ari, M. Koç, Female Entrepreneurship for Sustainable Economy and Development—Challenges, Drivers, and Suggested Policies for Resource-Rich Countries, Sustainability 2022, Vol. 14, Page 13412 14 (2022) 13412. [CrossRef]
- M. Al-Qahtani, M.F. Zguir, L. Al-Fagih, M. Koç, Women Entrepreneurship for Sustainability: Investigations on Status, Challenges, Drivers, and Potentials in Qatar, Sustainability (Switzerland) 14 (2022). [CrossRef]
- A.H.F. Salwa, M.H.M. Yahya, A.R. Azila, M. Fidlizan, The Performance of Married and Single-Mother Entrepreneurs: Evidence from Malaysia, Islamic Perspectives Relating to Business, Arts, Culture and Communication (2015) 419–428. [CrossRef]
- J. Alfredo Galindo da Fonseca, C. Berubé, Spouses and Entrepreneurship, (2019).
- P. Bayat, M. Daraei, A. Rahimikia, Designing of an open innovation model in science and technology parks, J Innov Entrep 11 (2022). [CrossRef]
- Metrash2 | Hukoomi Qatar E-Government, (n.d.). https://hukoomi.gov.qa/en/service/metrash2 (accessed January 6, 2024).












| Gender | Female | Male | ||||
| 151 | 251 | |||||
| Nationality | Non-Qatari | Qatari | ||||
| 111 | 291 | |||||
| Marital status | Married | Single | ||||
| 307 | 95 | |||||
| Education level | High school | Bachelor's degree | Master's degree | Doctorate or above | ||
| 38 | 247 | 82 | 35 | |||
| Age | 18-24 | 25-34 | 35-44 | 45-54 | 55 and above | |
| 47 | 158 | 165 | 14 | 18 | ||
| Education background | Art | Science | Business | Engineering | Finance | Others |
| 11 | 26 | 62 | 160 | 22 | 121 | |
| Employment status | Self-employed | Both (Self-employed and employed) | Employed | Student | Unemployed | |
| 9 | 39 | 308 | 45 | 1 | ||
| Business experience | None | 1-3 years | 4-6 years | 7-9 years | 10 years or more | |
| 151 | 139 | 41 | 9 | 62 | ||
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).