Submitted:
12 February 2024
Posted:
14 February 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
- What are users’ perceptions regarding the usability of the Metaverse? How does it influence their engagement and satisfaction?
- How do users perceive the interoperability of different Metaverse platforms? Are there preferences or significant challenges identified?
- In what ways does the social influence within the Metaverse impact user behavior and perceptions?
2. Related Work
| Study Reference | Topics Discussed | Outcome/Conclusion |
|---|---|---|
| [9,10] | Technology adoption | Factors like performance expectations, ease of use, and trust are crucial for technology adoption. Younger participants are more inclined towards Metaverse technology. |
| [11,12] | Integration of advanced tech in education | Technologies can enhance learning experiences. VR provides an immersive experience especially beneficial in healthcare education. |
| [13,14] | User perceptions | Importance of UX design, visualization, and involving users in decision-making. |
| [15] | Academic research potentials in the Metaverse | AI, blockchain, and virtual reality have significant implications for marketing in the metaverse. |
| [16,17,18] | Security | Emphasize on privacy regulations, stringent security measures, and the need for effective public policy to regulate the Metaverse. |
| [19] | Adoption | Importance of understanding user perception over technical features. |
| [20,21,22] | User experience, perception | Highlights potential of Metaverse in online education and remote training. |
| [20,21,23,24,25,26] | Metaverse’s potential across various industries | Emphasizes the need for more research to understand the transformative impact of the Metaverse. |
| [27,28,29] | Consumer experience, social presence, and immersive learning in Metaverse | Importance of service quality, immersive experiences, and the influence of devices on social presence. |
| [24,30,31,32,33] | User perceptions in educational settings | Highlights the effectiveness and potential of Metaverse and AR technologies in improving learning outcomes. |
3. Methodology

4. Users Perception of the Metaverse
4.1. Platforms Interoperability
4.1.1. The Role of Platform Interoperability in the Adoption of the Metaverse
4.1.2. Challenges Hurdling Platform Interoperability
4.2. Usability
4.2.1. Usability in Metaverse Ecosystems
4.2.2. Usability and User Experience
4.2.3. Usability’s Ethical and Social Implications
4.2.4. Users’ Acceptance of the Metaverse and Usability Challenges and Limitations
4.3. Social Influence
4.3.1. Social Influence in the Metaverse
4.4. Role of Social Influence on the Adoption of Metaverse
4.4.1. Impact of Social Media and Virtual Reality on Consumer Behavior
4.5. Challenges That Impact the Role of Social Influence in the Adoption of Metaverse
4.5.1. Social Influence and User Acceptance
5. Discussion
5.1. Practical Implications
5.2. Theoritical Implications
6. Future Research Directions
7. Conclusions and Research Limitations
Acknowledgments
References
- Abbate, S.; Centobelli, P.; Cerchione, R.; Oropallo, E.; Riccio, E. A first bibliometric literature review on Metaverse. 2022 IEEE Technology and Engineering Management Conference: Societal Challenges: Technology, Transitions and Resilience Virtual Conference, TEMSCON EUROPE 2022, 2022. [CrossRef]
- Islam Mozumder, M.A.; Athar, A.; Theodore Armand, T.P.; Sheeraz, M.M.; Imtiyaj Uddin, S.M.; Kim, H.C. Technological Roadmap of the Future Trend of Metaverse based on IoT, Blockchain, and AI Techniques in Metaverse Education. 2023 25th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT); IEEE: Pyeongchang, Korea, 2023; pp. 1414–1423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, Y.; Kang, J.; Niyato, D.; Ge, X.; Xiong, Z.; Miao, C.; Shen, X. Reliable Distributed Computing for Metaverse: A Hierarchical Game-Theoretic Approach. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 2023, 72, 1084–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kour, M.; Rani, K. Challenges and Opportunities to the Media and Entertainment Industry in Metaverse. In Applications of Neuromarketing in the Metaverse; Gupta, M., Shalender, K., Singla, B., Singh, N., Eds.; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, 2023; chapter 7; pp. 88–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zonaphan, L.; Northus, K.; Wijaya, J.; Achmad, S.; Sutoyo, R. Metaverse as A Future of Education: A Systematic Review. Proceedings of 2022 8th International HCI and UX Conference in Indonesia, CHIuXiD 2022, 2022; 77–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, M.; Lau, N. NFT digital twins: A digitalization strategy to preserve and sustain Miao silver craftsmanship in the metaverse era. Heritage 2023, 6, 1921–1941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, C.W. Application of metaverse service to healthcare industry: A strategic perspective. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 13038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim, D.J.; Jo, G.; Koo, J.H.; Yang, T.H.; Kim, Y.M. Development of a simulator capable of generating age-specific pulse pressure waveforms for medical palpation training. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 11555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kiu Chan, Y.; Ming Tang, Y.; Teng, L. A comparative analysis of digital health usage intentions towards the adoption of virtual reality in telerehabilitation. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2023, 174, 105042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Machado, F.; Suzuki, K.; Aburbeian, A.M.; Owda, A.Y.; Owda, M. A Technology Acceptance Model Survey of the Metaverse Prospects. AI 2022, Vol. 3, Pages 285-302 2022, 3, 285–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmad, I.; Sharma, S.; Singh, R.; Gehlot, A.; Priyadarshi, N.; Twala, B. MOOC 5.0: A roadmap to the future of learning. Sustainability 2022, 14, 11199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, S.; Abdullah; Armand, T.P.T.; Athar, A.; Hussain, A.; Ali, M.; Yaseen, M.; Joo, M.I.; Kim, H.C. Metaverse in healthcare integrated with explainable AI and blockchain: Enabling immersiveness, ensuring trust, and providing patient data security. Sensors 2023, 23, 565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Aria, R.; Archer, N.; Khanlari, M.; Shah, B. Influential factors in the design and development of a sustainable Web3/metaverse and its applications. Future Internet 2023, 15, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bibri, S.E. The social shaping of the Metaverse as an alternative to the imaginaries of data-driven smart cities: A study in science, technology, and society. Smart Cities 2022, 5, 832–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kar, A.K.; Varsha, P.S. Unravelling the techno-functional building blocks of metaverse ecosystems – A review and research agenda. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 2023; 100176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anshari, M.; Syafrudin, M.; Fitriyani, N.L.; Razzaq, A. Ethical responsibility and sustainability (ERS) development in a Metaverse business model. Sustainability 2022, 14, 15805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chow, Y.W.; Susilo, W.; Li, Y.; Li, N.; Nguyen, C. Visualization and cybersecurity in the Metaverse: A survey. J. Imaging 2022, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gupta, A.; Khan, H.U.; Nazir, S.; Shafiq, M.; Shabaz, M. Metaverse security: Issues, challenges and a viable ZTA model. Electronics (Basel) 2023, 12, 391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heller, J.; Mahr, D.; de Ruyter, K.; Schaap, E.; Hilken, T.; Keeling, D.I.; Chylinski, M.; Flavián, C.; Jung, T.; Rauschnabel, P.A. An interdisciplinary Co-authorship networking perspective on AR and human behavior: Taking stock and moving ahead. Computers in Human Behavior 2023, 143, 107697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Momtaz, P.P. Some very simple economics of Web3 and the Metaverse. FinTech 2022, 1, 225–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, S.; Kim, S. Identifying World Types to Deliver Gameful Experiences for Sustainable Learning in the Metaverse. Sustainability 2022, Vol. 14, Page 1361 2022, 14, 1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Said, G.R.E. Metaverse-based learning opportunities and challenges: A phenomenological Metaverse human–Computer Interaction study. Electronics (Basel) 2023, 12, 1379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mozumder, M.A.I.; Armand, T.P.T.; Imtiyaj Uddin, S.M.; Athar, A.; Sumon, R.I.; Hussain, A.; Kim, H.C. Metaverse for digital anti-aging healthcare: An overview of potential use cases based on artificial intelligence, blockchain, IoT technologies, its challenges, and future directions. Appl. Sci. (Basel) 2023, 13, 5127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, H.J.; Gu, H.H. Empirical research on the metaverse user experience of digital natives. Sustainability 2022, 14, 14747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Monaco, S.; Sacchi, G. Travelling the Metaverse: Potential benefits and main challenges for tourism sectors and research applications. Sustainability 2023, 15, 3348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Periyasami, S.; Periyasamy, A.P. Metaverse as future promising platform business model: Case study on fashion value chain. Businesses 2022, 2, 527–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suanpang, P.; Niamsorn, C.; Pothipassa, P.; Chunhapataragul, T.; Netwong, T.; Jermsittiparsert, K. Extensible metaverse implication for a smart tourism city. Sustainability 2022, 14, 14027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Voinea, G.D.; Gîrbacia, F.; Postelnicu, C.C.; Duguleana, M.; Antonya, C.; Soica, A.; Stănescu, R.C. Study of social presence while interacting in Metaverse with an augmented avatar during autonomous driving. Appl. Sci. (Basel) 2022, 12, 11804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, S.Y.; Kang, M.K. Efficacy testing of a multi-access metaverse-based early onset schizophrenia nursing simulation program: A quasi-experimental study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shu, X.; Gu, X. An empirical study of A smart education model enabled by the Edu-Metaverse to enhance better learning outcomes for students. Systems 2023, 11, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rojas, E.; Hülsmann, X.; Estriegana, R.; Rückert, F.; Garcia-Esteban, S. Students’ perception of metaverses for online learning in higher education: Hype or hope? Electronics (Basel) 2023, 12, 1867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sofianidis, A. Why do students prefer augmented reality: A mixed-method study on preschool teacher students’ perceptions on self-assessment AR quizzes in science education. Educ. Sci. (Basel) 2022, 12, 329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suh, W.; Ahn, S. Utilizing the metaverse for learner-centered constructivist education in the post-pandemic era: An analysis of elementary school students. J. Intell. 2022, 10, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Aburbeian, A.M.; Owda, A.Y.; Owda, M. A technology acceptance model survey of the metaverse prospects. Ai 2022, 3, 285–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhattacharya, P.; Saraswat, D.; Savaliya, D.; Sanghavi, S.; Verma, A.; Sakariya, V.; Tanwar, S.; Sharma, R.; Raboaca, M.S.; Manea, D.L. Towards Future Internet: The Metaverse perspective for diverse industrial applications. Mathematics 2023, 11, 941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- vom Brocke, J.; Simons, A.; Niehaves, B.; Niehaves, B.; Reimer, K.; Plattfaut, R.; Cleven, A. Reconstructing the giant: On the importance of rigour in documenting the literature search process. 17th European Conference on Information Systems ECIS 2009;, 2009; pp. 2206–2217.
- Downe-Wamboldt, B. Content analysis: Method, applications, and issues. Health Care for Women International 1992, 13, 313–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elo, S.; Kyngäs, H. The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2008, 62, 107–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maden, A.; Yücenur, G.N. Evaluation of sustainable metaverse characteristics using scenario-based fuzzy cognitive map. Computers in Human Behavior 2024, 152, 108090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zalan, T.; Barbesino, P. Making the metaverse real. Digital Business 2023, 3, 100059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, S. Storytelling and user experience in the cultural metaverse. Heliyon 2023, 9, e14759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Qamar, S.; Anwar, Z.; Afzal, M. A systematic threat analysis and defense strategies for the metaverse and extended reality systems. Computers & Security 2023, 128, 103127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, J.; Zhou, X.; Wu, W.; Wang, L.; Chen, Z. Worldwide overview and country differences in Metaverse research: A bibliometric analysis. Sustainability 2023, 15, 3541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gattullo, M.; Laviola, E.; Evangelista, A.; Fiorentino, M.; Uva, A.E. Towards the evaluation of Augmented Reality in the Metaverse: Information presentation modes. Appl. Sci. (Basel) 2022, 12, 12600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bibri, S.E.; Allam, Z. The Metaverse as a virtual form of data-driven smart urbanism: On post-pandemic governance through the prism of the logic of surveillance capitalism. Smart Cities 2022, 5, 715–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mirza, R.; Lytras, M.D.; Alzamzami, O.; Khuzayem, L.A.; Alharbi, H.; Alshammari, S.; Bafail, A.; Basbrain, A.; Alharbi, E.; Bajnaid, N.; Yusuf, N.; AlHalabi, W. Clustering potential metaverse users with the use of a value-based framework: Exploiting perceptions and attitudes on the use and adoption of metaverse for bold propositions. Telematics and Informatics 2024, 87, 102074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, J. An information ethics framework based on ICT platforms. Information (Basel) 2022, 13, 440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, U.K.; Kim, H. UTAUT in Metaverse: An “Ifland” Case. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2022, 17, 613–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alvarez-Risco, A.; Del-Aguila-Arcentales, S.; Rosen, M.A.; Yáñez, J.A. Social cognitive theory to assess the intention to participate in the Facebook Metaverse by citizens in Peru during the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Open Innov. 2022, 8, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sestino, A.; D’Angelo, A. My doctor is an avatar! The effect of anthropomorphism and emotional receptivity on individuals’ intention to use digital-based healthcare services. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2023, 191, 122505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gesmann-Nuissl, D.; Meyer, S. Siri 2.0—conversational commerce of social bots and the new law of obligations of data: Explorations for the benefit of consumer protection. Robotics 2022, 11, 125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alkhwaldi, A.F. Investigating the Social Sustainability of Immersive Virtual Technologies in Higher Educational Institutions: Students’ Perceptions toward Metaverse Technology. Sustainability 2024, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

| Aspect | Details | Reference(s) |
|---|---|---|
| Narrative Techniques | Importance of user-centric design in the cultural Metaverse. | [41] |
| Secure Platform Interoperability | Challenges in addressing security and privacy. Open Metaverse with a Zero-Trust Architecture model. Implications on user trust. | [18,42] |
| Collaboration | Need for Standardization. Compatibility fosters cooperation. Influence on user attitudes. | [17] |
| Overall Impact | Interoperability influences usability, security, and coherence of the Metaverse ecosystem. | [17,22,23,41,43] |
| Significance | Optimizing user experiences, collaboration, and addressing security through interoperability. There is a need for more research on its impact on user perspectives. | [15,17,23] |
| Potential Challenges on Metaverse Interoperability Studies | Reference(s) |
|---|---|
| Interoperability across multiple Metaverses. | [15] |
| Addressing interoperability uncertainties. | [40] |
| Establishing unified standards for user credentials. | [40] |
| Ensuring seamless user experience within the Metaverse. | [22] |
| Strengthening connections between platforms for better virtual connectivity. | [43] |
| Addressing security and privacy concerns of extended reality systems. | [42] |
| Integrating a Zero-Trust Architecture (ZTA) model in an open Metaverse framework. | [18] |
| Standardization within the Metaverse for coherence and interconnectivity. | [17] |
| Aspect of Usability | Challenges/Concerns | Reference(s) |
|---|---|---|
| General Usability | Context immersion, User Experience (UX) | [41] |
| Enhancing user interface, data visualization, ergonomic concerns | [9] | |
| Transaction and participation costs, Data privacy and ethics, Health concerns, Environmental impact, Shifting preferences | [20] | |
| AR Usability | Dark side of virtual ecosystem, Ethical concerns | [19] |
| Pragmatic and Hedonic qualities, Error counting | [44] | |
| User Experience in Metaverse Contexts | Security and Privacy, Content Generation, AI Predictions, Transparency of AI systems | [35] |
| Incorporation of external data, Patient-centric healthcare experiences | [7] | |
| Self-efficiency, Social norm, Perceived curiosity, Perceived pleasure, Price considerations | [10] | |
| Ethical and Social Implications | Security and Privacy concerns, Customer profiling, Aggressive marketing, Cyberbullying, Racism, Digital personality mining, Digital harassment | [16] |
| Privacy and security issues, Data privacy and cybersecurity regulations, Disparities in access | [25] | |
| Usability Challenges and Limitations | Access, Ease-of-use, Lack of developed ecosystem | [18] |
| Adoption and outcomes, Technological standards, Accessibility for older individuals, Comparison to in-person visits | [23] | |
| Augmented Reality Experiences | User-friendly designs in educational and training contexts | [19] |
| Usability of Metaverse in Healthcare | Usability impacted by the delivery of patient-centric healthcare experiences | [7] |
| Metaverse Technology | Relationship between usability and user acceptance | [10] |
| Ethical Considerations | Ethical responsibility, Security, Privacy, Digital harassment | [16] |
| Undemocratic and unethical practices due to surveillance capitalism | [45] |
| Reference | Findings Summary |
| [41] | Context Immersion (The article mentions a study by Kim that discusses immersion in augmented reality (AR) as context immersion. This refers to how AR logically interacts with the user’s real physical environment, incorporating dimensions such as time and location-based context, object-based context, and user-based context.) User Experience (UX) (The article emphasizes the importance of UX in immersive environments and the need for research to understand and optimize interactive communication content for a better user experience) |
| [9] | enhancing the user interface, data visualization, and considering ergonomic considerations |
| [20] | Transaction and participation costs. Data privacy and ethics concerns. Health-related concerns, Environmental impact. Shifting preferences (The demand for the Metaverse’s products, services, and way of living and working is influenced by shifting preferences) |
| [19] | challenges, risks, and ethical considerations associated with the use and implementation of the metaverse include: the potential dark side of the virtual ecosystem, to which AR serves as a gateway, virtual ecosystems, including the metaverse, and highlights the importance of research on these ecosystems, the technologies used to access them (such as AR), and the ethical concerns that arise |
| [44] | Pragmatic qualities. Hedonic qualities. Dual-task exercise and error counting. Potential of the Metaverse (The article highlights the potential of the Metaverse in connecting people together regardless of their location, which reinforces its usability). |
| [35] | Security and Privacy. Content Generation. AI Model Predictions. Transparency of AI Systems. |
| [7] | the incorporation of external data and the delivery of patient-centric healthcare experiences impact the usability of metaverse services in the healthcare industry |
| [10] | Self-efficiency. Social norm. Perceived curiosity. Perceived pleasure. Price |
| [16] | Security and Privacy Concerns. Customer Profiling. Aggressive Marketing. Cyberbullying and Racism.Digital Personality Mining. Digital Harassment. |
| [25] | Privacy and Security Issues. Data Privacy and Cybersecurity Regulations. Disparities in Access. |
| [18] | Access. Ease-of-Use. Lack of Developed Ecosystem. |
| [23] | Adoption and outcomes.Technological standards and protocols.Accessibility for older individuals. Comparison to in-person visits. |
| Category | Finding | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Factors Influencing Metaverse Usage | Ethical and governance issues, technological literacy, self-efficacy, consumer trust in virtual settings, and role of technology familiarity | [15,31,40,49] |
| Social Influence | Deceptive Behaviors, manipulation, Social Engineering, cyberbullying, and the Role of social norms and Peer Pressure | [25,40,49] |
| Role of AR, VR, | Augmented reality’s collaboration potential, anthropomorphism in healthcare, cyberbullying in social media, and social influence in AR | [19,35,44,50] |
| and Social Media | ||
| Consumer Behavior | Social Media’s role in Purchases, threats in VR, VR in Healthcare Adoption, and Manipulative Algorithms in purchases | [9,15,42,51] |
| Metaverse Benefits | Advantages in healthcare, governance importance, misinformation concerns, social media risks, and educational roles | [12,14,17,31,45] |
| and Challenges |
| Challenge | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Ethical Issues | Concerns around deceptive behaviours, impersonation, and unscrupulous activities by avatars controlled by malicious users. | [40] |
| Cyberbullying | Presence of negative influences in the Metaverse, such as cyberbullying, can affect user behaviour and experiences. | [35,49] |
| Misinformation | The potential for misinformation, agenda-driven corporate media influence, and mass formation hysteria. | [14] |
| Governance Issues | Risks associated with undemocratic and unscrupulous governance practices within the Metaverse, emphasizing the need for robust governance. | [17,45] |
| Manipulative Algorithms | The use of manipulative social algorithms that can unduly influence user decisions, especially in commerce platforms. | [51] |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).