Submitted:
07 February 2024
Posted:
12 February 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study area And Its Characteristics
2.2. Remote Sensing Data Used
2.2.1. Landsat Satellite Imagery
2.2.2. Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) Products
2.3. In-Situ Meteorological Observations
2.4. Reference Evapotranspiration (ETo) Estimation
2.5. METRIC Model
2.6. Developing an ANN Model for Actual Evapotranspiration (ETa) Estimation
3. Results
3.1. Implementation of the ANN Model
3.1.1. Scenario I
3.1.2. Scenario II
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Acknowledgments
References
- Abrishami N, Sepaskhah A.R, Shahrokhnia, M.H (2019) Estimating wheat and maize daily evapotranspiration using artificial neural network. Theoret. Appl. Climatol. 135 (3), 945–958. [CrossRef]
- Allen R, Tasumi M, Morse A, Trezza R, Wright J.L, Bastiaanssen W, Kramber W, Lorite L, Robison C.W (2007a) Satellite-based energy balance for mapping evapotranspiration with internalized calibration, METRIC (applications). J Irrig Drain Eng 133:395–406.
- Allen R.G, Pereira L.S, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration guidelines for computing crop water requirements, FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56. FAO, Rome.
- Allen R.G, Tasumi M, Trezza R (2007b) Satellite-based energy balance for mapping evapotranspiration with internalized calibration, METRIC (model). J Irrig Drain Eng 133:380–394. [CrossRef]
- Alsenjar O, Cetin M (2023c) Comparison of actual evapotranspiration by the Google Earth Engine Evapotranspiration Flux (EEFlux) to the METRIC model using remote sensing data and in-situ climate observations. The 3rd International Conference on Research of Agriculture and Food Technologies (I-CRAFT-2023), October 04 06, 2023, Adana, Türkiye, Proceedings Book of the Abstracts and/or Full Texts for Oral Presentations, pp. 140-145.
- Alsenjar O, Cetin M, Aksu H, Akgul M.A, Golpinar M.S (2023a) Cropping Pattern Classification Using Artificial Neural Networks and Evapotranspiration Estimation in the Eastern Mediterranean Region of Turkey. Journal of Agricultural Sciences (Tarim Bilimleri Dergisi), 29(2):677-689. [CrossRef]
- Alsenjar O, Cetin M, Aksu H, Golpinar M.S, Akgul M.A (2023b) Actual evapotranspiration estimation using METRIC model and Landsat satellite images over an irrigated field in the Eastern Mediterranean Region of Turkey. Mediterranean Geoscience Reviews (2023) 5:35–49. [CrossRef]
- Antonopoulos V.Z, Antonopoulos A.V (2017) Daily reference evapotranspiration estimates by artificial neural networks technique and empirical equations using limited input climate. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2017; 132: 86–96. [CrossRef]
- ASCE Task Committee on Application of Neural Networks in Hydrology (2000a) Artificial neural network in hydrology. I: preliminary concepts. J Hydrol Eng ASCE 5(2):115–123.
- ASCE Task Committee on Application of Neural Networks in Hydrology (2000b) Artificial neural network in hydrology. II: hydrologic application. J Hydrol Eng ASCE 5(2):124–137.
- Bachour R, Walker W, Ticlavilca A, McKee M, Maslova I (2014) Estimation of spatially distributed evapotranspiration using remote sensing and a relevance vector machine. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 140 (8): 04014029, 2014. [CrossRef]
- Bastiaanssen W.G.M, Menenti M, Feddes R.A, Holtslag A.A.M (1998a) A remote sensing surface energy balance algorithm for land (SEBAL): 1. Formul J Hydrol 212–213:198–212.
- Bastiaanssen W.G.M, Pelgrum H, Wang J, Ma Y, Moreno J.F, Roerink GJ, van der Wal T (1998b) A surface energy balance algorithm forland (SEBAL): 2. Validation. J Hydrol 212–213:213–229.
- Bhattarai N, Quackenbush L.J, Im J, Shaw S. B (2017) A new optimized algorithm for automating endmember pixel selection in the SEBAL and METRIC models. Remote Sensing of Environment, 196, 178-192. [CrossRef]
- Bruton J.M, McClendon R.W, Hoogenboom G (2000) Estimating daily pan evaporation with artificial neural networks. Trans ASABE 43: 491–496.
- Cetin M (2020) Agricultural Water Use. In Harmancioglu, N., Altinbilek, D. (Eds.), Water Resources of Turkey: World Water Resources, Vol. 2, Springer, Cham, 257-302.
- Cetin M, Alsenjar O, Aksu H, Golpinar M.S, Akgul M.A (2023b) Estimation of crop water stress index and leaf area index based on remote sensing data 2023. Water Supply 00:1. [CrossRef]
- Cetin M, Alsenjar O, Aksu, H, Golpinar M.S, Akgul, M.A (2023a) Comparing actual evapotranspiration estimations by METRIC to in-situ water balance measurements over an irrigated field in Turkey. Hydrological Sciences Journal. [CrossRef]
- Cetin M, Kaman H, Kirda C, Sesveren S (2020) Analysis of Irrigation Performance in Water Resources Planning and Management: A Case Study. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin (FEB), vol 29. 05: 3409-3414.
- Coppola Jr.E, Szidarovszky F, Poulton M, Charles E (2003) Artificial neural network approach for predicting transient water levels in a multilayered groundwater system under variable state, pumping, and climate conditions. Journal of hydrologic engineering, 8(6), 348-360.
- Daliakopoulos I.N, Coulibaly P, Tsanis I.K (2005) Groundwater level forecasting using artificial neural networks. Journal of hydrology, 309(1-4), 229-240.
- Dehbozorgi F, Sepaskhah A.R (2011) Comparison of artificial neural networks and prediction models for reference evapotranspiration estimation in a semi-arid region. Arch Agron Soil Sci 58:477–497.
- Ferreira L.B, Cunha F.F (2020) New approach to estimate daily reference evapotranspiration based on hourly temperature and relative humidity using machine learning and deep learning. Agricultural Water Management. 2020; 234: 106–113. [CrossRef]
- Garcia L. A, Shigidi, A. (2006) Using neural networks for parameter estimation in groundwater. Journal of Hydrology, 318(1-4), 215-231.
- Gharbia S.S, Smullen T, Gill L, Johnston P, Pilla F (2018) Spatially distributed potential evapotranspiration modeling and climate projections. Sci Tot Environ 633:571–592. [CrossRef]
- Granata F (2019) Evapotranspiration evaluation models based on machine learning algorithms: A comparative study. Agricultural Water Management. 2019; 217: 303–315. [CrossRef]
- Jain S.K, Nayak P.C, Sudheer K.P. (2008) Models for estimating evapotranspiration using artificial neural networks, and their physical interpretation. Hydrological Processes: An International Journal, 22(13), 2225-2234 .
- Karahan H, Ayvaz M.T (2006) Forecasting aquifer parameters using artificial neural networks. J Porous Media 9(5):429–444.
- Karahan H, Ayvaz M.T (2008) Simultaneous parameter identification of a heterogeneous aquifer system using artificial neural networks. Hydrogeology Journal, 16, 817-827.
- Karahan H, Iplikci S, Yasar M, Gurarslan G (2014) River flow estimation from upstream flow records using support vector machines. Journal of Applied Mathematics, 2014.
- Khoshhal J, Mokarram M (2012) Model for prediction of evapotranspiration using MLP neural network. Inter J Environ Sci 3:1000–100.
- Kumar M, Raghuwanshi N, Singh R, Wallender W, WO P (2002) Estimating evapotranspiration using artificial neural network. J Irrig Drain Eng 128:224–233.
- Kumar M, Raghuwanshi N.S, Singh R (2011) Artificial neural networks approach in evapotranspiration modeling: a review. Irrig Sci 29(1):11–25. [CrossRef]
- Luk K.C, Ball J.E, Sharma A (2000) A study of optimal model lag and spatial inputs to artificial neural network for rainfall forecasting. Journal of Hydrology, 227(1-4), 56-65.
- Madugundu R, Al-Gaadi K.A, Tola E, Hassaballa A.A, Patil V.C (2017) Performance of the METRIC model in estimating evapotranspiration fluxes over an irrigated field in Saudi Arabia using Landsat-8 images. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences. 2017; 21: 6135–6151. [CrossRef]
- Maier H. R, Dandy G.C (2000) Neural networks for the prediction and forecasting of water resources variables: a review of modelling issues and applications. Environmental modelling software, 15(1), 101-124.
- Mattar M.A (2018) Using gene expression programming in monthly reference evapotranspiration modeling: a case study in Egypt. Agricultural Water Management. 2018; 198: 28–38. [CrossRef]
- Odhiambo L.O, Yoder R.E, Yoder D.C, Hines J.W (2001) Optimization of fuzzy evapotranspiration model through neural training with input–output examples. Trans ASABE 44:1625–1633.
- Rawat K.S, Bala A, Singh S.K, Pal R.K (2017) Quantification of wheat crop evapotranspiration and mapping: a case study from bhiwani district of Haryana, India. Agric Water Manag 187:200–209. [CrossRef]
- Singh R.K, Irmak A (2011) Treatment of anchor pixels in the METRIC model for improved estimation of sensible and latent heat fluxes, Hydrological Sciences Journal, 56:5, 895-906. [CrossRef]
- Su Z (2002) The surface energy balance system (SEBS) for estimation of turbulent heat fluxes. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 6:85–100.
- Tang D, Feng Y, Gong D, Hao W, Cui N (2018) Evaluation of artificial intelligence models for actual crop evapotranspiration modeling in mulched and non-mulched maize croplands. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2018; 152: 375–384. [CrossRef]
- Tikhamarine Y, Malik A, Kumar A, Souag-Gamane D, Kisi O (2019) Estimation of monthly reference evapotranspiration using novel hybrid machine learning approaches. Hydrological Sciences Journal. 2019; 64: 1824–1842. [CrossRef]
- Virnodkar S.S, Pachghare V.K, Patil V.C, Jha S.K (2020) Application of Machine Learning on Remote Sensing Data for Sugarcane Crop Classification: A Review. In: Fong, S., Dey, N., Joshi, A. (eds) ICT Analysis and Applications. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 93. Springer, Singapore. [CrossRef]
- Yamac S.S, Todorovic M (2020) Estimation of daily potato crop evapotranspiration using three different machine learning algorithms and four scenarios of available meteorological data. Agric. Water Manag. 228, 105875.
- Zhang X.C, Wu J.W, Wu H.Y, Li Y (2011) Simplified SEBAL method for estimating vast areal evapotranspiration with MODIS data. WaterSci Eng 4:24–35. [CrossRef]






| Image | Day of the year (DOY) | Landsat scene-ID | Satellite type | Cloud cover (%) | Acquisition dates | Overpass local time (AM) |
| 1 | 260 | LC81750342020260LGN00 | Landsat 8 | 1 | 16.09.2020 | 11:15:56.5028510 |
| 2 | 300 | LE71750342020300SG100 | Landsat 7 | 8 | 26.10.2020 | 10:38:56.1154274 |
| 3 | 316 | LE71750342020316NPA00 | Landsat 7 | 3 | 11.11.2020 | 10:37:51.0228172 |
| 4 | 364 | LE71750342020364NPA00 | Landsat 7 | 1 | 29.12.2020 | 10:34:21.8153233 |
| 5 | 22 | LC81750342021022LGN00 | Landsat 8 | 9 | 22.01.2021 | 11:15:49.9861710 |
| 6 | 54 | LC81750342021054LGN00 | Landsat 8 | 7 | 23.02.2021 | 11:15:43.2139690 |
| 7 | 79 | LE71750342021078SG100 | Landsat 7 | 5 | 19.03.2020 | 10:28:24.8443048 |
| 8 | 118 | LC81750342021118LGN00 | Landsat 8 | 8 | 28.04.2021 | 11:15:15.8809360 |
| 9 | 134 | LC81750342021134LGN00 | Landsat 8 | 1 | 14.05.2021 | 11:15:15.9098560 |
| 10 | 158 | LE71750342021158SG100 | Landsat 7 | 1 | 07.06.2021 | 10:21:43.6865663 |
| 11 | 182 | LC81750342021182LGN00 | Landsat 8 | 4 | 01.07.2021 | 11:15:35.1871370 |
| 12 | 190 | LE71750342021190SG100 | Landsat 7 | 3 | 09.07.2021 | 10:19:04.5579664 |
| 13 | 198 | LC81750342021198LGN00 | Landsat 8 | 5 | 17.07.2021 | 11:15:36.9021800 |
| 14 | 214 | LC81750342021214LGN00 | Landsat 8 | 0 | 02.08.2021 | 11:15:45.3409259 |
| 15 | 230 | LC81750342021230LGN00 | Landsat 8 | 2 | 18.08.2021 | 11:15:51.0643500 |
| 16 | 262 | LC81750342021262LGN00 | Landsat 8 | 9 | 19.09.2021 | 11:15:59.0216650 |
| 17 | 278 | LC81750342021278LGN00 | Landsat 8 | 1 | 05.10.2021 | 11:16:04.4435930 |
| 18 | 294 | LC81750342021294LGN00 | Landsat8 | 0 | 21.10.2021 | 11:16:07.4309270 |
| 19 | 326 | LC81750342021326LGN00 | Landsat 8 | 6 | 22.11.2021 | 11:16:02.0432969 |
| 20 | 358 | LC81750342021358LGN00 | Landsat 8 | 4 | 24.12.2021 | 11:15:59.4307040 |
| 21 | 001 | LE71750342022001NPA00 | Landsat 7 | 13 | 01.01.2022 | 10:03:01.7753300 |
| 22 | 017 | LE71750342022017NPA00 | Landsat 7 | 3 | 17.01.2022 | 10:01:30.1854341 |
| 23 | 049 | LE71750342022049NPA00 | Landsat 7 | 6 | 18.02.2022 | 09:58:18.1083401 |
| 24 | 081 | LE71750342022081NPA00 | Landsat 7 | 19 | 22.03.2022 | 09:55:10.7155745 |
| 25 | 089 | LC81750342022089LGN00 | Landsat 8 | 7 | 30.03.2022 | 11:15:25.6965150 |
| 26 | 113 | LC91750342022113LGN00 | Landsat 9 | 2 | 23.04.2022 | 11:15:26.7327310 |
| 27 | 121 | LC81750342022121LGN00 | Landsat 8 | 60 | 01.05.2022 | 11:15:28.7371250 |
| 28 | 140 | LE71750342022140SG100 | Landsat 7 | 12 | 20.05.2022 | 09:50:56.6332014 |
| 29 | 157 | LE71750342022157SG100 | Landsat 7 | 23 | 06.06.2022 | 09:50:06.2292853 |
| 30 | 169 | LC81750342022169LGN00 | Landsat 8 | 1 | 18.06.2022 | 11:15:53.3072380 |
| 31 | 186 | LE71750342022186SG100 | Landsat 7 | 0 | 05.07.2022 | 09:42:29.8002719 |
| 32 | 201 | LC81750342022201LGN00 | Landsat 8 | 1 | 20.07.2022 | 11:15:58.6410700 |
| 33 | 209 | LC91750342022209LGN00 | Landsat 9 | 0 | 28.07.2022 | 11:15:42.4933480 |
| 34 | 220 | LE71750342022220SG100 | Landsat 7 | 29 | 08.08.2022 | 09:39:50.3921524 |
| 35 | 237 | LE71750342022237SG100 | Landsat 7 | 9 | 25.08.2022 | 09:38:18.9640686 |
| 36 | 249 | LC81750342022249LGN00 | Landsat 8 | 8 | 06.09.2022 | 11:16:15.2109079 |
| 37 | 271 | LE71750342022271SG100 | Landsat 7 | 3 | 28.09.2022 | 09:34:51.9536731 |
| 38 | 297 | LC81750342022297LGN00 | Landsat 8 | 0 | 24.10.2022 | 11:16:18.0041120 |
| MODIS standard products | Parameter | Spatial resolution | Temporal resolution |
| MOD09GA-Terra | NDVI | 500 m by 500 m | Daily |
| MOD11A1.061-Terra | LST | 1000 m by 1000 m | MOD09GA-Terra |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).