Submitted:
16 January 2024
Posted:
17 January 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
PURPOSE OR GOAL
APPROACH
ACTUAL OR ANTICIPATED OUTCOMES
- ■
- Registration via the online form was successful, with a total of 90 registrants. Eventually 90 people downloaded the app and had access to the game.
- ■
- Participation was very satisfactory, with 90 freshmen activating the game. Participation was optional and had no effect on course grades.
- ■
- At the level of understanding and assimilation of the learning material, an increase of 25% was observed over the initial percentage of correct answers. The initial percentage of correct answers was 50%, while the final percentage of correct answers was 75%.
References
- Fragkoulis, I., Anagnou, E. (2014). Teachers' views in relation to the utilization of experiential participatory teaching techniques in the context of their participation in training programs, in: Scientific Educational Journal Educ@tional Cirlcle. pp. 49–64. Vol. 2.
- Gougoulakis, P., Kedraka, K., Oikonomou, A., & Anastasiades, P. (2020). Teaching in Tertiary Education-A reflective and experiential approach to University Pedagogy.Academia, (20-21), 101-137.
- Johnson, D., Deterding, S., Kuhn, K. A., Staneva, A., Stoyanov, S., & Hides, L. (2016). Gamification for health and wellbeing: A systematic review of the literature. Internet interventions, 6, 89-106. [CrossRef]
- Pereira, P., Duarte, E., Rebelo, F., & Noriega, P. (2014). A review of gamification for health-related contexts. In Design, User Experience, and Usability. User Experience Design for Diverse Interaction Platforms and Environments: Third International Conference, DUXU 2014, Held as Part of HCI International 2014, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, June 22-27, 2014, Proceedings, Part II 3 (pp. 742-753). Springer International Publishing. [CrossRef]
- Huotari, K., & Hamari, J. (2012). Defining gamification: a service marketing perspective. In Proceeding of the 16th international academic MindTrek conference (pp. 17-22). [CrossRef]
- Ikonomou, A., Kaldrimidou, M., Sakonidis, C., & Tzekaki, M. (1999). Interaction in the mathematics classroom: some epistemological aspects. Mathematics Education I, 168.
- Kaimara, P., Poulimenou, S. M., Oikonomou, A., Deliyannis, I., & Plerou, A. (2019). Smartphones at schools? Yes, why not?. European Journal of Engineering and Technology Research, 1-6. [CrossRef]
- Kouni, Z., & Koutsoukos, M. (2019). The Counseling Role of the Teacher in Greek Secondary Schools: Investigating Students' Attitudes Toward It. Education Quarterly Reviews, 2(3). [CrossRef]
- PAD ASPAITE, 2022, www.aspete.gr.
- Triantafyllou, S. A. (2022). Constructivist Learning Environments. Proceedings of The 5th International Conference on Advanced Research in Teaching and Education, 2022. https://www.doi.org/10.33422/5th.icate.2022.04.10. [CrossRef]
- Triantafyllou, S., & Georgiadis, C. (2022). Gamification of moocs and security awareness in corporate training. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Computer Supported Education. [CrossRef]
- Triantafyllou, S. A., & Sapounidis, T. (2023). Game-based learning approach and serious games to learn while you play. 2023 IEEE World Engineering Education Conference (EDUNINE). [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).