Submitted:
16 January 2024
Posted:
16 January 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Instrument Details
2.1. Principles of Airborne IDOAS
2.2. Design of the Airborne Fiber IDOAS Instrument
2.2.1. Pre-Optical System
2.2.2. Spectral Imaging System
2.2.3. Circuit Control System
3. Aviation Platform and Flight Lines
3.1. Modification of Aircraft Platforms
3.2. Flight Lines
4. Data Processing
4.1. Preprocessing
4.1.1. Data Selection
4.1.2. Dark-Current Correction
4.1.3. Spatial Binning
4.1.4. In-Flight Calibration
4.2. DOAS Analysis
4.3. AMF Calculations, Geo-Referencing, and Mapping
4.4. Aircraft Angle and Geolocation Correction
5. Results and Discussion
5.1. IDOAS Results
5.2. Comparison of IDOAS and Satellite data
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Platt, U.; Stutz, J. Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy: Principles and Applications; Springer-Verlag: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2008; p. 598. [Google Scholar]
- Bobrowski, N.; von Glasow, R.; Aiuppa, A.; Inguaggiato, S.; Louban, I.; Ibrahim, O.W.; Platt, U. Reactive Halogen Chemistry in Volcanic Plumes. J. Geophys. Res. 2007, 112(D6), (D06311). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bobrowski, N.; Hönninger, G.; Lohberger, F.; Platt, U. IDOAS: A New Monitoring Technique to Study the 2D Distribution of Volcanic Gas Emissions. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 2006, 150(4), 329–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Louban, I.; Bobrowski, N.; Rouwet, D.; Inguaggiato, S.; Platt, U. Imaging DOAS for Volcanological Applications. Bull. Volcanol. 2009, 71(7), 753–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, H.; Kim, Y.J.; Jung, J.; Lee, C.; Heue, K.P.; Platt, U.; Hu, M.; Zhu, T. Spatial and Temporal Variations in NO(2) Distributions over Beijing, China Measured by Imaging Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy. J. Environ. Manag. 2009, 90(5), 1814–1823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Valks, P.; Pinardi, G.; Richter, A.; Lambert, J.-C.; Hao, N.; Loyola, D.; Van Roozendael, M.; Emmadi, S. Operational Total and Tropospheric NO2 Column Retrieval for GOME-2. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 2011, 4(7), 1491–1514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beirle, S.; Platt, U.; von Glasow, R.; Wenig, M.; Wagner, T. Estimate of Nitrogen Oxide Emissions from Shipping by Satellite Remote Sensing. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2004, 31(18), (L18102). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beirle, S.; Boersma, K.F.; Platt, U.; Lawrence, M.G.; Wagner, T. Megacity Emissions and Lifetimes of Nitrogen Oxides Probed from Space. Science 2011, 333(6050), 1737–1739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goldberg, D.L.; Anenberg, S.C.; Kerr, G.H.; Mohegh, A.; Lu, Z.; Streets, D.G. TROPOMI NO2 in the United States: A Detailed Look at the Annual Averages, Weekly Cycles, Effects of Temperature, and Correlation with Surface NO2 Concentrations. Earths Future 2021, 9(4), e2020EF001665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Heue, K.P.; Wagner, T.; Broccardo, S.P.; Walter, D.; Piketh, S.J.; Ross, K.E.; Beirle, S.; Platt, U. Direct Observation of Two Dimensional Trace Gas Distribution with an Airborne Imaging DOAS Instrument. Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. 2008, 8(22), 6707–6717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- General, S.; Pöhler, D.; Sihler, H.; Bobrowski, N.; Frieß, U.; Zielcke, J.; Horbanski, M.; Shepson, P.B.; Stirm, B.H.; Simpson, W.R.; Weber, K.; Fischer, C.; Platt, U. The Heidelberg Airborne Imaging DOAS Instrument (HAIDI) – A Novel Imaging DOAS Device for 2-D and 3-D Imaging of Trace Gases and Aerosols. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 2014, 7(10), 3459–3485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schönhardt, A.; Altube, P.; Gerilowski, K.; Krautwurst, S.; Hartmann, J.; Meier, A.C.; Richter, A.; Burrows, J.P. A Wide Field-of-View Imaging DOAS Instrument for Two-Dimensional Trace Gas Mapping from Aircraft. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 2015, 8(12), 5113–5131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lawrence, J.P.; Anand, J.S.; Vande Hey, J.D.; White, J.; Leigh, R.R.; Monks, P.S.; Leigh, R.J. High-Resolution Measurements from the Airborne Atmospheric Nitrogen Dioxide Imager (ANDI). Atmos. Meas. Tech. 2015, 8(11), 4735–4754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tack, F.; Merlaud, A.; Iordache, M.D.; Pinardi, G.; Roozendael, M.V. Assessment of the TROPOMI Tropospheric no2 Product Based on Airborne Apex Observations. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 2021, 14(1), 615–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tack, F.; Merlaud, A.; Meier, A.C.; Vlemmix, T.; Ruhtz, T.; Iordache, M.; Ge, X.; van der Wal, L.; Schuettemeyer, D.; Ardelean, M.; Calcan, A.; Constantin, D.; Schönhardt, A.; Meuleman, K.; Richter, A.; Van Roozendael, M. Intercomparison of Four Airborne Imaging DOAS Systems for Tropospheric NO2 Mapping – The AROMAPEX Campaign. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 2019, 12(1), 211–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu Jin, J.; Si Fuqi, F.; Zhou Haijin, H.; Zhao Minjie, M.; Dou Ke, K.; Wang Yu, Y.; Liu Wenqing, W. Estimation of Sulfur Dioxide Emission from Power Plant Using Imaging Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy Technique. Acta Opt. Sin. 2015, 35(6), 337–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xi, L.; Si, F.; Jiang, Y.; Zhou, H.; Zhan, K.; Chang, Z.; Qiu, X.; Yang, D. First High-Resolution Tropospheric NO2 Observations from the Ultraviolet Visible Hyperspectral Imaging Spectrometer (UVHIS). Atmos. Meas. Tech. 2021, 14(1), 435–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chance, K.; Kurucz, R.L. An improved high-resolution solar reference spectrum for earth’s atmosphere measurements in the ultraviolet, visible, and near infrared. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf. 2010, 111(9), 1289–1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Danckaert, T.; Fayt, C.; Van Roozendael, M.; Smedt, I.D.; Letocart, V.; Merlaud, A.; Pinardi, G. QDOAS Software User Manual, version 3.2; Royal Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy: Uccle, Belgium, 2015; p. 123. [Google Scholar]
- Rozanov, V.V.; Rozanov, A.V.; Kokhanovsky, A.A.; Burrows, J.P. Radiative transfer through terrestrial atmosphere and ocean: Software package SCIATRAN. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf. 2014, 133, 13–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]























| Parameter | Data Source |
|---|---|
| Wavelength | 338–370 nm |
| Wavelength calibration | Kurucz |
| Absorption cross-section | |
| NO2 | Vandaele (1998): 294 k |
| O4 | Hermans (2011): 298 k |
| O3 | Bogumil (2003): 293 k |
| Polynomial degree | Order 5 |
| Parameter | Setting |
|---|---|
| Wavelength | 354 nm |
| Detector height | 1 km |
| Surface reflectance | 0.01–0.4 (steps of 0.01) |
| Solar zenith angle | 60–70° (steps of 10°) |
| Viewing zenith angle | 0–50° (steps of 10°) |
| Relative azimuth angle | 0–180° (steps of 30°) |
| Aerosol optical depth | 0–1.6° (steps of 0.1°) |
| Aerosol profile | Box of 2.0 km |
| NO2 profile | Box of 2.0 km |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).