Submitted:
08 January 2024
Posted:
08 January 2024
Read the latest preprint version here
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
Diagnostic algorithm
Patients
Treatment algorithm for BMS
Study variables
Statistical analysis
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Russo, M.; Crafa, P.; Guglielmetti, S.; Franzoni, L.; Fiore, W.; Di Mario, F. Burning Mouth Syndrome Etiology: A Narrative Review. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 2022, 31, 223–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- International Classification of Orofacial Pain, 1st edition (ICOP). Cephalalgia 2020, 40, 129–221. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Currie, C.C.; Ohrbach, R.; De Leeuw, R.; Forssell, H.; Imamura, Y.; Jääskeläinen, S.K.; Koutris, M.; Nasri-Heir, C.; Huann, T.; Renton, T.; et al. Developing a research diagnostic criteria for burning mouth syndrome: Results from an international Delphi process. J Oral Rehabil 2021, 48, 308–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Imamura, Y.; Okada-Ogawa, A.; Noma, N.; Shinozaki, T.; Watanabe, K.; Kohashi, R.; Shinoda, M.; Wada, A.; Abe, O.; Iwata, K. A perspective from experimental studies of burning mouth syndrome. Journal of Oral Science 2020, 62, 165–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Castillo-Felipe, C.; Tvarijonaviciute, A.; López-Arjona, M.; Pardo-Marin, L.; Pons-Fuster, E.; López-Jornet, P. Response to Treatment with Melatonin and Clonazepam versus Placebo in Patients with Burning Mouth Syndrome. Journal of Clinical Medicine 2022, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Suga, T.; Tu, T.T.H.; Nagamine, T.; Toyofuku, A. Careful use of clonazepam and alpha lipoid acid in burning mouth syndrome treatment. Oral Dis 2022, 28, 846–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sakata, K.-i.; Yamazaki, Y.; Ohga, N.; Sato, J.; Asaka, T.; Yoshikawa, K.; Nakazawa, S.; Sato, C.; Nakamura, Y.; Kitagawa, Y. Clinical efficacy of a traditional Japanese (kampo) medicine for burning mouth syndrome. Traditional & Kampo Medicine 2016, 3, 120–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nakazawa, S.; Okada, K.; Matsushita, T.; Hegozaki, S.; Sakata, K.-i.; Kitagawa, Y.; Yamazaki, Y. Effectiveness of rikkosan gargling for burning mouth syndrome. Traditional & Kampo Medicine 2017, 4, 121–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hato, H.; Sakata, K.-i.; Sato, J.; Asaka, T.; Ohga, N.; Yamazaki, Y.; Kitagawa, Y. Efficacy of rikkosan for primary burning mouth syndrome: a retrospective study. BioPsychoSocial Medicine 2021, 15, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nijs, J.; Lahousse, A.; Kapreli, E.; Bilika, P.; Saraçoğlu, İ.; Malfliet, A.; Coppieters, I.; De Baets, L.; Leysen, L.; Roose, E.; et al. Nociplastic Pain Criteria or Recognition of Central Sensitization? Pain Phenotyping in the Past, Present and Future. Journal of Clinical Medicine 2021, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yilmaz, Z.; Renton, T.; Yiangou, Y.; Zakrzewska, J.; Chessell, I.P.; Bountra, C.; Anand, P. Burning mouth syndrome as a trigeminal small fibre neuropathy: Increased heat and capsaicin receptor TRPV1 in nerve fibres correlates with pain score. J Clin Neurosci 2007, 14, 864–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Veilleux, M.-P.; Moriyama, S.; Yoshioka, M.; Hinode, D.; Grenier, D. A Review of Evidence for a Therapeutic Application of Traditional Japanese Kampo Medicine for Oral Diseases/Disorders. Medicines 2018, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Izumi-Nakaseko, H.; Chiba, K.; Goto, A.; Kambayashi, R.; Matsumoto, A.; Takei, Y.; Kawai, S.; Sugiyama, A. Electropharmacological Characterization of Licorice Using the Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes Sheets and the Chronic Atrioventricular Block Dogs. Cardiovascular Toxicology 2023, 23, 207–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]


| Pain scores | Pre | Post |
| Mean | 5.9 | 3.8 |
| SD | 2.5 | 2.2 |
| Mean - SD | 3.4 | 1.6 |
| Mean + SD | 8.3 | 5.9 |
| Variable | Values |
| paired t test’s p-value | 5.5 × 10-5 (*) |
| The difference | 2.1 |
| Effect size | 1.2 |
| Standard deviation of change | 1.8 |
| Standard error of change | 0.41 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).