Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

The Impact of Different Irrigation Protocols on the Bond Strength of Self-Adhesive Composite Cement to Radicular Dentin

Version 1 : Received: 11 December 2023 / Approved: 12 December 2023 / Online: 12 December 2023 (05:30:09 CET)
Version 2 : Received: 15 January 2024 / Approved: 16 January 2024 / Online: 16 January 2024 (06:37:30 CET)

How to cite: Vrebac, M.; Mohenski, D.; Klarić Sever, E.; Janković, B.; Bergman, L.; Ivanišević, A. The Impact of Different Irrigation Protocols on the Bond Strength of Self-Adhesive Composite Cement to Radicular Dentin. Preprints 2023, 2023120797. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202312.0797.v1 Vrebac, M.; Mohenski, D.; Klarić Sever, E.; Janković, B.; Bergman, L.; Ivanišević, A. The Impact of Different Irrigation Protocols on the Bond Strength of Self-Adhesive Composite Cement to Radicular Dentin. Preprints 2023, 2023120797. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202312.0797.v1

Abstract

The aim of the study was to examine the influence of different irrigation protocols on the shear bond strength (SBS) of self-adhesive resin composite cement (SARC) to radicular dentin. Radicular dentin slabs (N=58) were sectioned from extracted intact third molars, embedded in acrylate, polished, and randomly assigned to five experimental groups (N=8-12) and one control group, CG (N=8). Irrigation solutions used were sodium hypochlorite (H), ethylene-diamine-tetra acetic acid (EDTA), etidronic acid with hypochlorite (HEDP), saline solution (SS), and chlorhexidine (CHX). Each experimental group underwent different irrigation protocol for two minutes: 1) H/EDTA/H, 2) HEDP, 3) H/EDTA/CHX, 4)H/EDTA/SS, and 5) HEDP/SS. The CG samples were not treated with any irrigation solution. After drying, dual-curing SARC was applied to the radicular dentin using molds corresponding to the Ultra Tester. Specimens were stored at 37°C in distilled water and fractured in shear mode after 10 days. The results were analyzed using the ANOVA statistical test and Post-hoc Games-Howell test, α=0.05. CG exhibited the highest SBS. Except for HEDP and HEDP/SS, all experimental groups showed significantly lower SBS compared to the control group (p< 0.05). HEDP seems to be adequate solution for root canal cleaning before fiber post cementa-tion with self-adhesive resin cement. Cleaning protocols with H, EDTA and CHX cause a signif-icant decrease in bond strength.

Keywords

etidronic acid; root canal irrigants; self-adhesive resin cement; shear bond strength

Subject

Chemistry and Materials Science, Ceramics and Composites

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.