Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Clinical Evaluation of Alveolar Permeability as a Biomarker of Potential Harm

Version 1 : Received: 5 December 2023 / Approved: 6 December 2023 / Online: 6 December 2023 (07:40:43 CET)

How to cite: Makena, P.; Baxter-Write, S.; Jones, B.; Chen, P.; Prasad, G.L. Clinical Evaluation of Alveolar Permeability as a Biomarker of Potential Harm. Preprints 2023, 2023120349. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202312.0349.v1 Makena, P.; Baxter-Write, S.; Jones, B.; Chen, P.; Prasad, G.L. Clinical Evaluation of Alveolar Permeability as a Biomarker of Potential Harm. Preprints 2023, 2023120349. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202312.0349.v1

Abstract

The lung epithelium regulates gas exchange and is the first line of defense against airborne toxicants and microbial infections. Disruption of the integrity of lung epithelium results in altered permeability and severely impacts normal lung functions. To develop biomarkers of potential harm (BoPH) for assessing adverse health effects of cigarette smoking, we have evaluated lung barrier function. In a single-center, ambulatory, clinical study we measured lung permeability, as the half-life (T1/2) of inhaled 99mTC-DTPA, in 17 subjects consisting of 6 Smokers (SMK), 5 Moist Snuff Consumers (MSC), and 6 Non-Tobacco Consumers (NTC) at three weekly test visits. Smokers, relative to MSC and NTC, exhibited significantly faster clearance of the inhaled probe (shorter T1/2), indicating increased lung permeability. NTC and MSC had comparable clearance times of the inhaled probe (longer T1/2). Least squares regression modeling showed that the variability of the test was minimal and was not significant. Prediction profiling showed that the repeatability of the lung permeability test was robust and was able to differentiate the tobacco product use groups in this study. Thus, altered lung barrier function may serve as a BoPH for assessing the effects of tobacco use.

Keywords

inhaled 99mTC-DTPA; lung permeability; smoking

Subject

Biology and Life Sciences, Toxicology

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.