Submitted:
30 December 2023
Posted:
03 January 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction


2. Literature Review
3. Enhancing Cybersecurity with AI and ML: The Evolution and Integration of Open XDR
3.1. Integrating Open XDR with AI and Machine Learning Innovations
3.2. Endpoint Detection and Response
3.3. Intrusion Detection Systems
3.3.1. IDS and Open XDR
3.4. Synergy between EDR, IDS and Open XDR
3.5. Security Information and Event Management
3.5.1. SIEM and Open XDR
3.6. Directory Service - Active Directory (AD)
3.7. Active Directory (AD) – Open XDR
3.8. Applications – Applications and Open XDR
3.9. Log Forwarding and Open XDR
3.10. Real-world implementation of XDR
3.11. Consolidating Insights: A Comprehensive Summary Table for Section Enhancement
| Section | AI/ML Techniques and Innovations | Benefits | Challenges | References |
| Open XDR Integration | Advanced data orchestration and correlation from various sources; Geolocation data integration; Real-time threat intelligence | Enhanced threat anticipation and prevention; Sophisticated defense mechanism | Complexity in integrating diverse data sources and technologies | [5,6,8,9,10] |
| Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) | Machine learning for anomaly detection and threat prediction; Self-learning algorithms | Improved surveillance and response; Prediction of potential vulnerabilities | Difficulty in detecting complex threats like DLL sideloading | [1,5,10,11,13,14] |
| Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) | Supervised and unsupervised learning techniques for alert analysis; Historical data analysis for trend identification | Reduced false positives; Ability to detect unknown threats | Alarm fatigue due to high volume of alerts | [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23] |
| Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) | Advanced analytics for deep investigation; Automated prioritization of alerts | Enhanced monitoring and detection; Improved decision-making capabilities | Challenges in handling large volumes of events; Data storage limitations | [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,30,31] |
| Active Directory (AD) | AI/ML for anomaly detection in user behavior; Real-time data processing | Enhanced detection of coordinated cyber-threats; Real-time threat neutralization | Complexity in extracting actionable information from vast datasets | [32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43] |
| AD and Open XDR Collaboration | Combined analysis of AD data and Open XDR for nuanced threat detection | Integrated approach to threat detection and response; Increased security | N/A | [44,45,46,47,48] |
| Applications and Open XDR | AI/ML for log file analysis; Pattern recognition and anomaly detection | Accurate identification of risks; Real-time data analysis for rapid response | Challenges in processing large volumes of complex data | [5,6,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57] |
| Log Forwarding and Open XDR | Centralized log data analysis; Cross-referencing data from different sources | Comprehensive view of digital activities; Advanced security analysis | Management of extensive log data; Need for advanced analytical technologies | [5,6,33,38,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70] |
4. Discussion
4.1. The Pivotal Role of Open XDR in Reinventing Cybersecurity Through AI and ML Integration
4.2. The Catalytic Role of Open XDR
4.3. Integration Challenges of AI and ML in Cybersecurity Frameworks and the evolving nature of cyber threats
4.4. Brief mention of the approaches the paper proposes for the identified challenges and potential areas for future research
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- S. Kumar, U. Gupta, A. K. Singh, and A. K. Singh, “Artificial Intelligence: Revolutionizing cyber security in the Digital Era,” Journal of Computers, Mechanical and Management, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 31–42, 2023. [CrossRef]
- 2. N. Acton, “AI in cybersecurity an introduction and case studies,” Snorkel AI. Accessed: Dec. 30, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://snorkel.ai/ai-in-cybersecurity/.
- P. Wheelwright, Heraclitus. Colchis Books, 1968.
- P. Firstbrook and C. Lawson, “Innovation insight for extended detection and response,” Gartner ID G00718616, 2021.
- D. A. S. GEORGE, A. H. George, T. Baskar, and D. Pandey, “XDR: The Evolution of Endpoint Security Solutions-Superior Extensibility and Analytics to Satisfy the Organizational Needs of the Future,” International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology (IJARSCT), vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 493–501, 2021. [CrossRef]
- A. S. George, S. Sagayarajan, T. Baskar, and A. H. George, “Extending Detection and Response: How MXDR Evolves Cybersecurity,” Partners Universal International Innovation Journal, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 268–285, 2023. [CrossRef]
- 7. I.-C. Olteanu, “Evaluating the response effectiveness of XDR technology in a scaled down environment”.
- N. Taneski, A. Petrovski, and D. Bogatinov, “Geography in geospatial intelligence-C4IRS and cyber security,” Security and crisis management–theory and practice, pp. 65–73, 2019.
- A. Butkovic, F. Orucevic, and A. Tanovic, “Using whois based geolocation and google maps api for support cybercrime investigations,” presented at the WSEAS International Conference on Circuits, Systems, Communications, Computers and Applications (CSCCA’13), 2013, pp. 194–201.
- P. R. Brandao and J. Nunes, “Extended Detection and Response”.
- 11. H. Kaur and R. Tiwari, “Endpoint detection and response using machine learning,” presented at the Journal of Physics: Conference Series, IOP Publishing, 2021, p. 012013.
- G. Karantzas and C. Patsakis, “An Empirical Assessment of Endpoint Detection and Response Systems against Advanced Persistent Threats Attack Vectors,” Journal of Cybersecurity and Privacy, vol. 1, no. 3, Art. no. 3, Sep. 2021. [CrossRef]
- E. Raff et al., “An investigation of byte n-gram features for malware classification,” Journal of Computer Virology and Hacking Techniques, vol. 14, pp. 1–20, 2018. [CrossRef]
- N. Šrndić and P. Laskov, “Practical evasion of a learning-based classifier: A case study,” presented at the 2014 IEEE symposium on security and privacy, IEEE, 2014, pp. 197–211.
- K. M. Al-Gethami, M. T. Al-Akhras, and M. Alawairdhi, “Empirical evaluation of noise influence on supervised machine learning algorithms using intrusion detection datasets,” Security and Communication Networks, vol. 2021, pp. 1–28, 2021. [CrossRef]
- G. Panagiotakopoulos, “Assessing open and closed EDRs,” 2023. [CrossRef]
- Γ. Κωστόπουλος, “Aξιολόγηση Open Source Λύσεων στο χώρο της τεχνολογίας EDR,” 2023.
- F. Skopik, G. Settanni, and R. Fiedler, “A problem shared is a problem halved: A survey on the dimensions of collective cyber defense through security information sharing,” Computers & Security, vol. 60, pp. 154–176, 2016. [CrossRef]
- G. González-Granadillo, S. González-Zarzosa, and R. Diaz, “Security information and event management (SIEM): analysis, trends, and usage in critical infrastructures,” Sensors, vol. 21, no. 14, p. 4759, 2021. [CrossRef]
- S. Bhatt, P. K. Manadhata, and L. Zomlot, “The operational role of security information and event management systems,” IEEE security & Privacy, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 35–41, 2014. [CrossRef]
- M. Žgela and I. Penga, “Security Information and Event Management–Capabilities, Challenges and Event Analysis in the Complex IT System,” in Central European Conference on Information and Intelligent Systems, Faculty of Organization and Informatics Varazdin, 2019, pp. 259–266. Accessed: Nov. 04, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://search.proquest.com/openview/4d4bac43b7c2bce82f3d54cc1b380f25/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=1986354.
- J. Pavlik, A. Komarek, and V. Sobeslav, “Security information and event management in the cloud computing infrastructure,” in 2014 IEEE 15th International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Informatics (CINTI), IEEE, 2014, pp. 209–214. Accessed: Nov. 04, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7028677/.
- J. Frigård, “Security Information and Event Management Systems Monitoring Automation Systems,” Master’s Thesis, 2019. Accessed: Nov. 04, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://trepo.tuni.fi/handle/10024/117593.
- G. Suarez-Tangil, E. Palomar, A. Ribagorda, and Y. Zhang, “Towards an intelligent security event information management system,” Advances in Security Information Management: Perceptions and Outcomes, 2014, Accessed: Nov. 04, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://nms.kcl.ac.uk/guillermo.suarez-tangil/papers/2013nova-AIS-SIEM.pdf.
- P. Radoglou-Grammatikis et al., “Spear siem: A security information and event management system for the smart grid,” Computer Networks, vol. 193, p. 108008, 2021. [CrossRef]
- R. Badhwar, “The Case for AI Artificial intelligence (AI)/ML Machine learning (ML) in Cybersecurity,” in The CISO’s Next Frontier: AI, Post-Quantum Cryptography and Advanced Security Paradigms, Springer, 2021, pp. 45–73.
- E. Blasch et al., “Machine learning/artificial intelligence for sensor data fusion–opportunities and challenges,” IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 80–93, 2021. [CrossRef]
- J. Kinyua and L. Awuah, “AI/ML in Security Orchestration, Automation and Response: Future Research Directions.,” Intelligent Automation & Soft Computing, vol. 28, no. 2, 2021. [CrossRef]
- M. Sheeraz et al., “Effective Security Monitoring Using Efficient SIEM Architecture,” Hum.-Centric Comput. Inf. Sci, vol. 13, pp. 1–18, 2023. [CrossRef]
- Z. Younus and M. Alanezi, “A Survey on Network Security Monitoring: Tools and Functionalities,” Mustansiriyah Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 55–86, 2023.
- S. Dhamodaran, C. Dandothikar, C. S. P. Reddy, and J. T. Janapati, “An Extensive Review of Literature on IDS and IPS”.
- 32. J. Chilberto et al., “Identity Security with Azure Active Directory,” Cloud Debugging and Profiling in Microsoft Azure: Application Performance Management in the Cloud, pp. 215–234, 2020.
- D. Zhao et al., “Botnet detection based on traffic behavior analysis and flow intervals,” computers & security, vol. 39, pp. 2–16, 2013. [CrossRef]
- N. C. Iyer, A. M. Kabbur, and H. G. Wali, “Implementation of Active Directory for efficient management of networks,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 172, pp. 112–114, 2020. [CrossRef]
- L. Kotlaba, S. Buchovecká, and R. Lórencz, “Active Directory Kerberoasting Attack: Detection using Machine Learning Techniques.,” presented at the ICISSP, 2021, pp. 376–383.
- V. Uppströmer and H. Råberg, “Detecting lateral movement in microsoft active directory log files: A supervised machine learning approach,” 2019.
- O. Lukas and S. Garcia, “Deep generative models to extend active directory graphs with honeypot users,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.06180, 2021. [CrossRef]
- N. Dhir, H. Hoeltgebaum, N. Adams, M. Briers, A. Burke, and P. Jones, “Prospective artificial intelligence approaches for active cyber defence,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.09981, 2021. [CrossRef]
- Alazab, M. Hobbs, J. Abawajy, and M. Alazab, “Using feature selection for intrusion detection system,” in 2012 International Symposium on Communications and Information Technologies (ISCIT), Gold Coast, Australia: IEEE, Oct. 2012, pp. 296–301. [CrossRef]
- G. Creech, “Developing a high-accuracy cross platform Host-Based Intrusion Detection System capable of reliably detecting zero-day attacks,” UNSW Sydney, 2014. [CrossRef]
- S. Dua and X. Du, Data mining and machine learning in cybersecurity. CRC press, 2016.
- E. S. Hosney, I. T. A. Halim, and A. H. Yousef, “An artificial intelligence approach for deploying zero trust architecture (zta),” presented at the 2022 5th International Conference on Computing and Informatics (ICCI), IEEE, 2022, pp. 343–350.
- J. Nichols, K. Spakes, C. Watson, and R. Bridges, “Assembling a cyber range to evaluate artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML) security tools,” presented at the ICCWS 2021 16th International Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security, Academic Conferences Limited, 2021, p. 240.
- S. Muthuraj, M. Sethumadhavan, P. Amritha, and R. Santhya, “Detection and prevention of attacks on active directory using SIEM,” presented at the Information and Communication Technology for Intelligent Systems: Proceedings of ICTIS 2020, Volume 2, Springer, 2021, pp. 533–541.
- R. Younisse, M. Alkasassbeh, M. Almseidin, and H. Abdi, “AN EARLY DETECTION MODEL FOR KERBEROASTING ATTACKS AND DATASET LABELING,” Jordanian Journal of Computers and Information Technology, vol. 9, no. 1, 2023. [CrossRef]
- B. Shin, Security enhancement in defense information system by active directory. University of Delaware, 2019.
- M. Copeland and M. Copeland, “Getting Started with Azure Sentinel and XDR Capabilities,” Cloud Defense Strategies with Azure Sentinel: Hands-on Threat Hunting in Cloud Logs and Services, pp. 77–103, 2021. [CrossRef]
- P. Firstbrook et al., “Top trends in cybersecurity 2022,” Gartner Inc, 2022.
- 49. J. Zhu et al., “Tools and benchmarks for automated log parsing,” presented at the 2019 IEEE/ACM 41st International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice (ICSE-SEIP), IEEE, 2019, pp. 121–130.
- X. Zhang et al., “Robust log-based anomaly detection on unstable log data,” presented at the Proceedings of the 2019 27th ACM Joint Meeting on European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, 2019, pp. 807–817.
- A. Shiravi, H. Shiravi, M. Tavallaee, and A. A. Ghorbani, “Toward developing a systematic approach to generate benchmark datasets for intrusion detection,” computers & security, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 357–374, 2012. [CrossRef]
- E. M. Rudd, A. Rozsa, M. Gunther, and T. E. Boult, “A Survey of Stealth Malware Attacks, Mitigation Measures, and Steps Toward Autonomous Open World Solutions,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 1145–1172, 2017. [CrossRef]
- 53. M. Labonne, “Anomaly-based network intrusion detection using machine learning,” Institut polytechnique de Paris, 2020.
- C. Kolias, G. Kambourakis, A. Stavrou, and S. Gritzalis, “Intrusion detection in 802.11 networks: Empirical evaluation of threats and a public dataset,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 184–208, 2015. [CrossRef]
- V. Chandola, A. Banerjee, and V. Kumar, “Anomaly detection: A survey,” ACM computing surveys (CSUR), vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 1–58, 2009. [CrossRef]
- M. A. Amanullah et al., “Deep learning and big data technologies for IoT security,” Computer Communications, vol. 151, pp. 495–517, 2020. [CrossRef]
- M. Tavallaee, E. Bagheri, W. Lu, and A. A. Ghorbani, “A detailed analysis of the KDD CUP 99 data set,” presented at the 2009 IEEE symposium on computational intelligence for security and defense applications, Ieee, 2009, pp. 1–6.
- S. J. Stolfo, W. Fan, W. Lee, A. Prodromidis, and P. K. Chan, “Cost-based modeling for fraud and intrusion detection: Results from the JAM project,” presented at the Proceedings DARPA Information Survivability Conference and Exposition. DISCEX’00, IEEE, 2000, pp. 130–144.
- R. Meyers, “Data highway and the digital transformation: arguments for secure, centralised log management,” Network Security, vol. 2020, no. 10, pp. 17–19, 2020. [CrossRef]
- 60. T. Diotalevi et al., “Collection and harmonization of system logs and prototypal Analytics services with the Elastic (ELK) suite at the INFN-CNAF computing centre,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.02612, 2021.
- S. Han, H. Mao, and W. J. Dally, “Deep Compression: Compressing Deep Neural Networks with Pruning, Trained Quantization and Huffman Coding.” arXiv, Feb. 15, 2016. Accessed: Oct. 29, 2023. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1510.00149.
- S. Udipi, “The event data management problem: getting the most from network detection and response,” Network Security, vol. 2021, no. 1, pp. 12–14, 2021. [CrossRef]
- A. Cappelletti and S. Maglione, “Developing log analysis for a worldwide distributed system,” 2021.
- T.-F. Yen and M. K. Reiter, “Are your hosts trading or plotting? telling p2p file-sharing and bots apart,” presented at the 2010 IEEE 30th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, IEEE, 2010, pp. 241–252.
- J. Bogatinovski and O. Kao, “Auto-Logging: AI-centred Logging Instrumentation,” presented at the 2023 IEEE/ACM 45th International Conference on Software Engineering: New Ideas and Emerging Results (ICSE-NIER), IEEE, 2023, pp. 95–100.
- J. JONES, A. IONIŢĂ, and I.-C. MIHAI, “AI and IoT Mapping and the Transition to an Interconnected Cyber Defence and Intelligence Capabilities,” presented at the International Conference on Cybersecurity and Cybercrime, 2022, pp. 5–22. [CrossRef]
- M. E. Bonfanti, “Artificial intelligence and the offence-defence balance in cyber security,” Cyber Security: Socio-Technological Uncertainty and Political Fragmentation. London: Routledge, pp. 64–79, 2022.
- R. Das and R. Sandhane, “Artificial intelligence in cyber security,” presented at the Journal of Physics: Conference Series, IOP Publishing, 2021, p. 042072. [CrossRef]
- H.-J. Liao, C.-H. R. Lin, Y.-C. Lin, and K.-Y. Tung, “Intrusion detection system: A comprehensive review,” Journal of Network and Computer Applications, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 16–24, 2013. [CrossRef]
- P. C. P. O. Trilho, “Intelligent Systems for Cyber Defence-An Architecture Framework for Cyber Defence using Artificial Intelligence,” 2022.
- “Keys to a Successful XDR Implementation, Automated threat hunting.” Accessed: Dec. 30, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://stellarcyber.ai/keys-to-a-successful-xdr-implementation/.
- R. Humphries, “How four real-world truths about cybersecurity shaped our approach to XDR,” Sophos News. Accessed: Dec. 30, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://news.sophos.com/en-us/2021/12/07/how-four-real-world-truths-about-cybersecurity-shaped-our-approach-to-xdr/.
- J. Broth, “Unlocking Game-Changing Cybersecurity With Open XDR,” AiThority. Accessed: Dec. 30, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://aithority.com/technology/unlocking-game-changing-cybersecurity-with-open-xdr/.
- M. A. Islam, “Application of artificial intelligence and machine learning in security operations center,” Issues in Information Systems, vol. 24, no. 4, 2023.
- M. T. Khan, A. Akhunzada, and S. Zeadally, “Proactive defense for fog-to-things critical infrastructure,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 60, no. 12, pp. 44–49, 2022. [CrossRef]
- J. A. Lewis and W. Crumpler, “Cybersecurity and the Problem of Interoperability,” Jan. 2020, Accessed: Dec. 25, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.csis.org/analysis/cybersecurity-and-problem-interoperability.
- “Challenges of AI and Data Privacy—And How to Solve Them,” ISACA. Accessed: Dec. 25, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.isaca.org/resources/news-and-trends/newsletters/atisaca/2021/volume-32/challenges-of-ai-and-data-privacy-and-how-to-solve-them.
- L. Kasowaki and K. Emir, “AI and Machine Learning in Cybersecurity: Leveraging Technology to Combat Threats,” Art. no. 11610, Dec. 2023, Accessed: Dec. 26, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://easychair.org/publications/preprint/PjF7.
- S. Axelsson, “Intrusion detection systems: A survey and taxonomy,” 2000.
- E. M. Hutchins, M. J. Cloppert, and R. M. Amin, “Intelligence-driven computer network defense informed by analysis of adversary campaigns and intrusion kill chains,” Leading Issues in Information Warfare & Security Research, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 80, 2011.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).