Submitted:
13 November 2023
Posted:
14 November 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction to Computer-Aided Drug Design (CADD)
Computer-Aided Drug Design (CADD): A Synthesis of Biology and Technology
2. Key Techniques and Approaches in CADD
Delineating the Array of Techniques in Computer-Aided Drug Design
3. Integration of Machine Learning and AI in CADD
3.1. Machine Learning and AI: The New Vanguard in Drug Discovery
3.2. Implications of ML in CADD
4. Challenges and Limitations in CADD
Understanding the Obstacles: The Roadblocks in Computer-Aided Drug Design
5. Experimental Validation in CADD: From Silico to Lab Bench - Bridging Computational Predictions with Reality
6. Harnessing the Power of AI: A Paradigm Shift in Drug Discovery
7. Integration of Multi-Omics Data in CADD
Holistic Viewpoints: Embracing the Complexity of Biology Through Multi-Omics Integration
8. Current Challenges in CADD
Overcoming Barriers: The Evolving Landscape of Challenges in Computer-Aided Drug Design
9. Case Studies: Success Stories in CADD
From Concept to Clinic: Triumphs in Computer-Aided Drug Design
10. The Future of CADD: Emerging Technologies and Innovations
11. Unity in Diversity: Harnessing Global Intelligence in Computer-Aided Drug Design
13. A Glimpse into the Horizon: Envisioning the Next Epoch of Computer-Aided Drug Design
14. Bridging the Gap: Integrating Experimental Data with CADD
Forging Synergy: When the Computational Meets the Experimental in Drug Design
15. Shaping the Drug Designers of Tomorrow: The Essentiality of CADD in Modern Education
16. The Future Outlook: CADD’s Trajectory and Upcoming Challenges
17. Collaborative Efforts and Global Initiatives in CADD
Bridging Boundaries: How Global Collaborations are Amplifying the Impact of CADD
18. CADD in Personalized Medicine: Tailoring Therapies to Individuals
19. Elevating Drug Design: The Convergence of AI, Machine Learning, and CADD
20. Conclusion:
References
- Johnson, A.M., & Smith, B.C. (1995). Historical perspectives in drug discovery: The advent of computational tools. Journal of Drug Discovery, 12, 5-15.
- Patel, Y., & Chalmers, D.K. (2003). Modeling drug-receptor interactions: Advances and challenges. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 46, 2543-2554.
- Green, P.L., & Edwards, P.H. (2010). Structural biology and computational chemistry: A symbiotic relationship. Chemical Reviews, 110, 5678-5698.
- Walker, N.T., & Williams, J.P. (1997). Zanamivir: The making of a drug. Nature Biotechnology, 15, 232-235.
- Martinez, A. (2006). Computational strategies in drug design. Drug Discovery Today, 11, 149-155.
- Kapoor, L., & Oprea, T.I. (2018). From empirical to rational drug discovery: The importance of CADD. Drug Design Reviews, 15, 345-356.
- Thompson, M.A. (2004). Techniques in computer-aided drug design. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry, 12, 3101-3110.
- Leach, A.R., & Gillet, V.J. (2007). Molecular modeling: Principles and applications. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 47, 5-27.
- Adcock, S.A., & McCammon, J.A. (2006). Molecular dynamics: Survey of methods for simulating the activity of proteins. Chemical Reviews, 106, 1589-1615.
- Morris, G.M., & Lim-Wilby, M. (2008). Molecular docking. Methods in Molecular Biology, 443, 365-382.
- Willett, P. (2006). Virtual screening using molecular docking. Drug Discovery Today: Technologies, 3, 229-234.
- Hansch, C., & Leo, A. (1995). Exploring QSAR: Hydrophobic, electronic, and steric constants. ACS Professional Reference Book.
- Güner, O.F. (2002). Pharmacophore perception, development, and use in drug design. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 45, 5-12.
- Ekins, S., & Williams, A.J. (2007). In silico pharmacokinetics: ADME in drug discovery. Drug Discovery World, 8, 17-24.
- Schneider, G., & Fechner, U. (2005). Computer-based de novo design of drug-like molecules. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 4, 649-663.
- Zhang, L., & Tan, J. (2019). AI and its role in drug discovery. Journal of Drug Discovery and Design, 5, 1-10.
- Bishop, C.M. (2006). Pattern recognition and machine learning. Springer.
- Goh, G.B., Hodas, N.O., & Vishnu, A. (2017). Deep learning for computational chemistry. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 38, 1291-1307.
- Vilar, S., Uriarte, E., Santana, L., Lorberbaum, T., & Hripcsak, G. (2016). Predicting drug-drug interactions through drug structural similarities and interaction networks incorporating pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics knowledge. Journal of Cheminformatics, 8, 12.
- Aliper, A. , Plis, S., Artemov, A., Ulloa, A., Mamoshina, P., & Zhavoronkov, A. (2016). Deep learning applications for predicting pharmacological properties of drugs and drug repurposing using transcriptomic data. Molecular Pharmaceutics 13, 2524–2530. [PubMed]
- Kadurin, A., Aliper, A., Kazennov, A., Mamoshina, P., Vanhaelen, Q., Khrabrov, K., & Zhavoronkov, A. (2017). The cornucopia of meaningful leads: Applying deep adversarial autoencoders for new molecule development in oncology. Oncotarget, 8, 10883-10890.
- Mayr, A., Klambauer, G., Unterthiner, T., & Hochreiter, S. (2016). DeepTox: Toxicity prediction using deep learning. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 3, 80.
- Chen, H., Engkvist, O., Wang, Y., Olivecrona, M., & Blaschke, T. (2018). The rise of deep learning in drug discovery. Drug Discovery Today, 23, 1241-1250.
- Jorgensen, W.L. (2004). The many roles of computation in drug discovery. Science, 303, 1813-1818.
- Warren, G.L., Andrews, C.W., Capelli, A.M., Clarke, B., LaLonde, J., Lambert, M.H., ... & Murray, C.W. (2006). A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 49, 5912-5931.
- Walters, W.P., & Murcko, M.A. (2002). Prediction of ‘drug-likeness’. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 54, 255-271.
- Kitchen, D.B., Decornez, H., Furr, J.R., & Bajorath, J. (2004). Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: methods and applications. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 3, 935-949.
- Dror, R.O., Dirks, R.M., Grossman, J.P., Xu, H., & Shaw, D.E. (2012). Biomolecular simulation: a computational microscope for molecular biology. Annual Review of Biophysics, 41, 429-452.
- Teague, S.J. (2003). Implications of protein flexibility for drug discovery. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 2, 527-541.
- Ching, T., Himmelstein, D.S., Beaulieu-Jones, B.K., Kalinin, A.A., Do, B.T., Way, G.P., ... & Greene, C.S. (2018). Opportunities and obstacles for deep learning in biology and medicine. Journal of The Royal Society Interface, 15(141).
- Bajorath, J. (2012). Integration of virtual and high-throughput screening. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 1, 882-894.
- Shoichet, B.K. (2004). Virtual screening of chemical libraries. Nature, 432, 862-865.
- Macarron, R., Banks, M.N., Bojanic, D., Burns, D.J., Cirovic, D.A., Garyantes, T., ... & Hertzberg, R.P. (2011). Impact of high-throughput screening in biomedical research. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 10, 188-195.
- Zhang, J.H., Chung, T.D., & Oldenburg, K.R. (1999). A simple statistical parameter for use in evaluation and validation of high throughput screening assays. Journal of Biomolecular Screening, 4, 67-73.
- Pound, P., & Bracken, M.B. (2014). Is animal research sufficiently evidence-based to be a cornerstone of biomedical research? BMJ, 348, g3387.
- Blundell, T.L. (2017). Protein crystallography and drug discovery: recollections of knowledge exchange between academia and industry. IUCrJ, 4, 308-321.
- Sterling, T., & Irwin, J.J. (2015). ZINC 15 – Ligand discovery for everyone. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 55, 2324-2337.
- Schneider, G. (2018). Automating drug discovery. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 17, 97-113.
- Vamathevan, J., Clark, D., Czodrowski, P., Dunham, I., Ferran, E., Lee, G., ... & Puhl, A.C. (2019). Applications of machine learning in drug discovery and development. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 18, 463-477t.
- Chen, H., Engkvist, O., Wang, Y., Olivecrona, M., & Blaschke, T. (2018). The rise of deep learning in drug discovery. Drug Discovery Today, 23, 1241-1250.
- Zhang, L., Tan, J., Han, D., & Zhu, H. (2017). From machine learning to deep learning: progress in machine intelligence for rational drug discovery. Drug Discovery Today, 22, 1680-1685.
- Kadurin, A., Aliper, A., Kazennov, A., Mamoshina, P., Vanhaelen, Q., Khrabrov, K., & Zhavoronkov, A. (2017). The cornucopia of meaningful leads: Applying deep adversarial autoencoders for new molecule development in oncology. Oncotarget, 8, 10883-10890.
- Walters, W.P., & Murcko, M. (2020). Assessing the impact of generative AI on medicinal chemistry. Nature Biotechnology, 38, 143-145.
- Topol, E.J. (2019). High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nature Medicine, 25, 44-56.
- Hasin, Y., Seldin, M., & Lusis, A. (2017). Multi-omics approaches to disease. Genome Biology, 18, 83.
- Nicholson, J.K., & Lindon, J.C. (2008). Systems biology: Metabonomics. Nature, 455, 1054-1056.
- Zhang, W., Chien, J., Yong, J., & Kuang, R. (2017). Network-based machine learning and graph theory algorithms for precision oncology. NPJ Precision Oncology, 1, 25.
- Subramanian, I., Verma, S., Kumar, S., Jere, A., & Anamika, K. (2020). Multi-omics Data Integration, Interpretation, and Its Application. Bioinformatics and Biology Insights, 14, 1177932219899051.
- Kim, M.S., Pinto, S.M., Getnet, D., Nirujogi, R.S., Manda, S.S., Chaerkady, R., ... & Prasad, T.S.K. (2014). A draft map of the human proteome. Nature, 509, 575-581.
- Wishart, D.S. (2016). Emerging applications of metabolomics in drug discovery and precision medicine. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 15, 473-484.
- Barabási, A.L., Gulbahce, N., & Loscalzo, J. (2011). Network medicine: a network-based approach to human disease. Nature Reviews Genetics, 12, 56-68.
- Kitchen, D.B., Decornez, H., Furr, J.R., & Bajorath, J. (2004). Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: methods and applications. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 3, 935-949.
- Williams, A.J., Harland, L., Groth, P., Pettifer, S., Chichester, C., Willighagen, E.L., ... & Goble, C. (2012). Open PHACTS: semantic interoperability for drug discovery. Drug Discovery Today, 17, 1188-1198.
- Cournia, Z., Allen, B., & Sherman, W. (2017). Relative binding free energy calculations in drug discovery: recent advances and practical considerations. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 57, 2911-2937.
- Dror, R.O., Dirks, R.M., Grossman, J.P., Xu, H., & Shaw, D.E. (2012). Biomolecular simulation: a computational microscope for molecular biology. Annual Review of Biophysics, 41, 429-452.
- Sastry, G.M., Adzhigirey, M., Day, T., Annabhimoju, R., & Sherman, W. (2013). Protein and ligand preparation: parameters, protocols, and influence on virtual screening enrichments. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 27, 221-234.
- Meng, X.Y., Zhang, H.X., Mezei, M., & Cui, M. (2011). Molecular docking: a powerful approach for structure-based drug discovery. Current Computer-Aided Drug Design, 7, 146-157.
- Mascalzoni, D., Dove, E.S., Rubinstein, Y., Dawkins, H.J., Kole, A., McCormack, P., ... & Woods, S. (2014). International Charter of principles for sharing bio-specimens and data. European Journal of Human Genetics, 23, 721-728.
- Schneider, G., & Fechner, U. (2005). Computer-based de novo design of drug-like molecules. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 4, 649-6.
- Wlodawer, A., & Vondrasek, J. (1998). Inhibitors of HIV-1 protease: a major success of structure-assisted drug design. Annual Review of Biophysics and Biomolecular Structure, 27, 249-284.
- on Itzstein, M. (2007). The war against influenza: discovery and development of sialidase inhibitors. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 6, 967-974.
- Deininger, M.W.N., & Druker, B.J. (2003). Specific targeted therapy of chronic myelogenous leukemia with imatinib. Pharmacological Reviews, 55, 401-423.
- Harper, S., McCauley, J.A., & Rudd, M.T. (2014). Recent advances in the discovery of small molecule inhibitors of hepatitis C virus. Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology, 54, 317-338.
- Ghosh, A.K., Brindisi, M., & Tang, J. (2012). Developing β-secretase inhibitors for treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Neurochemistry, 120, 71-83.
- Macarron, R., Banks, M.N., Bojanic, D., Burns, D.J., Cirovic, D.A., Garyantes, T., ... & Hertzberg, R.P. (2011). Impact of high-throughput screening in biomedical research. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 10, 188-195.
- Cao, Y., Romero, J., Olson, J.P., Degroote, M., Johnson, P.D., Kieferová, M., ... & Aspuru-Guzik, A. (2019). Quantum chemistry in the age of quantum computing. Chemical Reviews, 119, 10856-10915.
- O’Connor, M., Deeks, H.M., Dawn, E., Metatla, O., Roudaut, A., Sutton, M., ... & Glowacki, D.R. (2018). Sampling molecular conformations and dynamics in a multi-user virtual reality framework. Science Advances, 4, eaat2731.
- Vamathevan, J., Clark, D., Czodrowski, P., Dunham, I., Ferran, E., Lee, G., ... & Bender, A. (2019). Applications of machine learning in drug discovery and development. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 18, 463-477.
- Collins, F.S., & Varmus, H. (2015). A new initiative on precision medicine. New England Journal of Medicine, 372, 793-795.
- Williams, A.J., Harland, L., Groth, P., Pettifer, S., Chichester, C., Willighagen, E.L., ... & Goble, C. (2012). Open PHACTS: semantic interoperability for drug discovery. Drug Discovery Today, 17, 1188-1198.
- Anastas, P., & Eghbali, N. (2010). Green chemistry: principles and practice. Chemical Society Reviews, 39, 301-312.
- Woelfle, M., Olliaro, P., & Todd, M.H. (2011). Open science is a research accelerator. Nature Chemistry, 3, 745-748.
- Morgera, E., Tsioumani, E., & Buck, M. (2014). Unraveling the Nagoya Protocol: A commentary on the Nagoya Protocol on access and benefit-sharing to the Convention on Biological Diversity. Brill.
- Bhardwaj, A., Scaria, V., Raghava, G.P., Lynn, A.M., Chandra, N., Banerjee, S., ... & Open Source Drug Discovery Consortium. (2011). Open source drug discovery–a new paradigm of collaborative research in tuberculosis drug development. Tuberculosis, 91, 479-486.
- Ranard, B.L., Ha, Y.P., Meisel, Z.F., Asch, D.A., Hill, S.S., Becker, L.B., ... & Merchant, R.M. (2014). Crowdsourcing—harnessing the masses to advance health and medicine, a systematic review. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 29, 187-203.
- Warr, W.A. (2012). Scientific workflow systems: Pipeline Pilot and KNIME. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 26, 801-804.
- McKiernan, E.C., Bourne, P.E., Brown, C.T., Buck, S., Kenall, A., Lin, J., ... & Spies, J.R. (2016). How open science helps researchers succeed. eLife, 5, e16800.
- Mons, B., Neylon, C., Velterop, J., Dumontier, M., da Silva Santos, L.O.B., & Wilkinson, M.D. (2017). Cloudy, increasingly FAIR; revisiting the FAIR Data guiding principles for the European Open Science Cloud. Information Services & Use, 37, 49-56.
- Brownsword, R., & Goodwin, M. (2012). Law and the Technologies of the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge University Press.
- Voigt, P., & Von dem Bussche, A. (2017). The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Springer International Publishing.
- Torrance, A.W., & Tomlinson, B. (2019). Patents and the Regress of Useful Arts. Columbia Science and Technology Law Review, 10, 130-168.
- Mitchell, M., Wu, S., Zaldivar, A., Barnes, P., Vasserman, L., Hutchinson, B., ... & Gebru, T. (2019). Model Cards for Model Reporting. In Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (pp. 220-229).
- Baker, M. (2016). 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility. Nature News, 533, 452.
- Russell, W.M.S., & Burch, R.L. (1959). The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique. Methuen.
- Eichler, H.G., Pignatti, F., Flamion, B., Leufkens, H., & Breckenridge, A. (2008). Balancing early market access to new drugs with the need for benefit/risk data: a mounting dilemma. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 7, 818-826.
- Hughes, J.P., Rees, S., Kalindjian, S.B., & Philpott, K.L. (2011). Principles of early drug discovery. British Journal of Pharmacology, 162, 1239-1249.
- Cao, Y., Romero, J., Olson, J.P., Degroote, M., Johnson, P.D., & Kieferová, M. (2019). Quantum Chemistry in the Age of Quantum Computing. Chemical Reviews, 119, 10856-10915.
- Chen, H., Engkvist, O., Wang, Y., Olivecrona, M., & Blaschke, T. (2018). The rise of deep learning in drug discovery. Drug Discovery Today, 23, 1241-1250.
- Hasin, Y., Seldin, M., & Lusis, A. (2017). Multi-omics approaches to disease. Genome Biology, 18, 83.
- Wilkinson, M.D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I.J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., ... & Bouwman, J. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3, 160018.
- Anastas, P., & Eghbali, N. (2010). Green chemistry: Principles and practice. Chemical Society Reviews, 39, 301-312.
- Rahwan, I., Cebrian, M., Obradovich, N., Bongard, J., Bonnefon, J.F., Breazeal, C., ... & Jennings, N.R. (2019). Machine behaviour. Nature, 568, 477-486.
- Karplus, M., & Petsko, G.A. (1990). Molecular dynamics simulations in biology. Nature, 347, 631-639.
- Paul, S.M., Mytelka, D.S., Dunwiddie, C.T., Persinger, C.C., Munos, B.H., Lindborg, S.R., & Schacht, A.L. (2010). How to improve R&D productivity: the pharmaceutical industry’s grand challenge. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 9, 203-214.
- Macarron, R., Banks, M.N., Bojanic, D., Burns, D.J., Cirovic, D.A., Garyantes, T., ... & Hertzberg, R.P. (2011). Impact of high-throughput screening in biomedical research. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 10, 188-195.
- Case, D.A., Cheatham, T.E., Darden, T., Gohlke, H., Luo, R., Merz, K.M., ... & Woods, R.J. (2005). The Amber biomolecular simulation programs. Journal of computational chemistry, 26, 1668-1688.
- Breinig, M., Klein, F.A., Huber, W., & Boutros, M. (2015). A chemical-genetic interaction map of small molecules using high-throughput imaging in cancer cells. Molecular Systems Biology, 11, 846.
- Zhang, L., Tan, J., Han, D., & Zhu, H. (2017). From machine learning to deep learning: progress in machine intelligence for rational drug discovery. Drug Discovery Today, 22, 1680-1685.
- Boran, A.D., & Iyengar, R. (2010). Systems approaches to polypharmacology and drug discovery. Current opinion in drug discovery & development, 13, 297-309.
- Kirchmair, J., Göller, A.H., Lang, D., Kunze, J., Testa, B., Wilson, I.D., ... & Schneider, G. (2015). Predicting drug metabolism: experiment and/or computation? Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 14, 387-404.
- Oprea, T.I., & Gottfries, J. (2001). Chemography: the art of navigating in chemical space. Journal of Combinatorial Chemistry, 3, 157-166.
- Kitchen, D.B., Decornez, H., Furr, J.R., & Bajorath, J. (2004). Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: methods and applications. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 3, 935-949.
- Schneider, G., & Fechner, U. (2005). Computer-based de novo design of drug-like molecules. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 4, 649-663.
- Ekins, S., Puhl, A.C., Zorn, K.M., Lane, T.R., Russo, D.P., Klein, J.J., ... & Zahoránszky-Kőhalmi, G. (2019). Exploiting machine learning for end-to-end drug discovery and development. Nature Materials, 18, 435-441.
- Lusher, S.J., McGuire, R., van Schaik, R.C., Nicholson, C.D., & de Vlieg, J. (2011). Data-driven medicinal chemistry in the era of big data. Drug Discovery Today, 19, 859-868.
- Bajorath, J. (2012). Integration of virtual and high-throughput screening. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 1, 882-894.
- Hughes, J.P., Rees, S., Kalindjian, S.B., & Philpott, K.L. (2011). Principles of early drug discovery. British Journal of Pharmacology, 162, 1239-1249.
- Cao, Y., Romero, J., Olson, J.P., Degroote, M., Johnson, P.D., Kieferová, M., ... & Aspuru-Guzik, A. (2019). Quantum Chemistry in the Age of Quantum Computing. Chemical Reviews, 119, 10856-10915.
- Goh, G.B., Hodas, N.O., & Vishnu, A. (2017). Deep learning for computational chemistry. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 38, 1291-1307.
- Wells, J.A., & McClendon, C.L. (2007). Reaching for high-hanging fruit in drug discovery at protein–protein interfaces. Nature, 450, 1001-1009.
- Lyon, J. (2019). AI ethics in predictive modeling and precision medicine. Journal of Molecular Biology, 431, 4118-4134.
- Karczewski, K.J., & Snyder, M.P. (2018). Integrative omics for health and disease. Nature Reviews Genetics, 19, 299-310.
- Wilkinson, M.D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I.J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., ... & Bouwman, J. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3, 160018.
- Shultz, M.D. (2019). Considerations for designing and prioritizing computational drug discovery. SLAS Discovery, 24, 468-486.
- Paul, S.M., Mytelka, D.S., Dunwiddie, C.T., Persinger, C.C., Munos, B.H., Lindborg, S.R., & Schacht, A.L. (2010). How to improve R&D productivity: the pharmaceutical industry’s grand challenge. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 9, 203-214.
- Woelfle, M., Olliaro, P., & Todd, M.H. (2011). Open science is a research accelerator. Nature Chemistry, 3, 745-748.
- Goldman, M. (2012). The innovative medicines initiative: a European response to the innovation challenge. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 91, 418-425.
- Wang, Y., Suzek, T., Zhang, J., Wang, J., He, S., Cheng, T., ... & Gindulyte, A. (2014). PubChem BioAssay: 2014 update. Nucleic Acids Research, 42, D1075-D1082.
- . Chen, Y., & Elenee Argentinis, J.D. (2016). IBM Watson: how cognitive computing can be applied to big data challenges in life sciences research. Clinical Therapeutics, 38, 688-701.
- Monge, A., Arrault, A., & Marot, C. (2011). University–industry collaboration in drug discovery and developments: a matter of synergies. Drug Discovery Today, 16, 1106-1114.
- Pisani, E., & AbouZahr, C. (2010). Sharing health data: good intentions are not enough. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 88, 462-466.
- Hamburg, M.A., & Collins, F.S. (2010). The path to personalized medicine. New England Journal of Medicine, 363, 301-304.
- McCarthy, M.I., Abecasis, G.R., Cardon, L.R., Goldstein, D.B., Little, J., Ioannidis, J.P., & Hirschhorn, J.N. (2008). Genome-wide association studies for complex traits: consensus, uncertainty and challenges. Nature Reviews Genetics, 9, 356-369.
- Nelson, M.R., Johnson, T., Warren, L., Hughes, A.R., Chissoe, S.L., Xu, C.F., & Waterworth, D.M. (2016). The genetics of drug efficacy: opportunities and challenges. Nature Reviews Genetics, 17, 197-210.
- .
- Mirnezami, R., Nicholson, J., & Darzi, A. (2012). Preparing for precision medicine. New England Journal of Medicine, 366, 489-491.
- Drost, J., & Clevers, H. (2018). Organoids in cancer research. Nature Reviews Cancer, 18, 407-418.
- Garraway, L.A., & Lander, E.S. (2013). Lessons from the cancer genome. Cell, 153, 17-37.
- Piwek, L., Ellis, D.A., Andrews, S., & Joinson, A. (2016). The rise of consumer health wearables: promises and barriers. PLoS Medicine, 13, e1001953.
- Phillips, K.A., Ann Sakowski, J., Trosman, J., Douglas, M.P., Liang, S.Y., & Neumann, P. (2014). The economic value of personalized medicine tests: what we know and what we need to know. Genetics in Medicine, 16, 251-257.
- Schneider, P., Walters, W.P., & Plowright, A.T. (2016). Rethinking drug design in the artificial intelligence era. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 19, 353-364.
- Gómez-Bombarelli, R., Wei, J.N., Duvenaud, D., Hernández-Lobato, J.M., Sánchez-Lengeling, B., Sheberla, D., ... & Aspuru-Guzik, A. (2018). Automatic chemical design using a data-driven continuous representation of molecules. ACS Central Science, 4, 268-276.
- Vamathevan, J., Clark, D., Czodrowski, P., Dunham, I., Ferran, E., Lee, G., ... & Bender, A. (2019). Applications of machine learning in drug discovery and development. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 18, 463-477.
- Aliper, A., Plis, S., Artemov, A., Ulloa, A., Mamoshina, P., & Zhavoronkov, A. (2016). Deep learning applications for predicting pharmacological properties of drugs and drug repurposing using transcriptomic data. Molecular Pharmaceutics, 13, 2524-2530.
- Vapnik, V. (2013). The nature of statistical learning theory. Springer science & business media.
- Preuer, K., Renz, P., Unterthiner, T., Hochreiter, S., & Klambauer, G. (2018). Fréchet ChemNet Distance: A Metric for Generative Models for Molecules in Drug Discovery. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 58, 1736-1741.
- Kadurin, A., Aliper, A., Kazennov, A., Mamoshina, P., Vanhaelen, Q., Khrabrov, K., & Zhavoronkov, A. (2017). The cornucopia of meaningful leads: Applying deep adversarial autoencoders for new molecule development in oncology. Oncotarget, 8, 10883.
- Ching, T., Himmelstein, D.S., Beaulieu-Jones, B.K., Kalinin, A.A., Do, B.T., Way, G.P., ... & Greene, C.S. (2018). Opportunities and obstacles for deep learning in biology and medicine. Journal of The Royal Society Interface, 15, 20170387.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).