Preprint
Review

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Fatty Liver Disease and Chronic Viral Hepatitis: The Interlink

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

13 November 2023

Posted:

14 November 2023

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) has now affected nearly one third of global population and became the number one cause of chronic liver disease in the world because of the obesity pandemic. Chronic hepatitis resulting from hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) also remain significant challenges to liver health even in the 21st century. The coexistence of MAFLD and chronic viral hepatitis can markedly alter the disease course of individual diseases and can complicate the management of each of these disorders. Thorough understanding of the pathobiological interlink and interactions between MAFLD and these two chronic viral hepatitis infections are crucial for appropriate management of patients. We update these interlinks in this comprehensive clinical review.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  

Introduction

Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) has become the most common cause of chronic liver disease in recent years affecting nearly one-third of the global population because of the obesity pandemic1. Although a good proportion of MAFLD cases can remain clinically nonprogressive, some cases can develop severe forms of disease such as hepatic fibrosis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Several factors including environmental, epigenetic, genetic, metabolic, and infective causes can influence the progression of MAFLD to advanced stages of liver disease2. In fact, the old terminology nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), was changed in 2020 to MAFLD by the international consensus panel to reflect these associations of the disease3. With the new nomenclature, several uncertainties in relation to the pathobiology and consequences of the disease have been resolved4.
Chronic viral hepatitis resulting from infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) remains an important cause of advanced liver disease in several regions of the world. Hepatic steatosis is a common feature of both chronic HBV5 and HCV6 infections. When patients with MAFLD acquire these chronic viral infections or vice versa, the pathobiological characteristics of either disease can be markedly altered, and the risk of progression to advanced liver disease can be perpetuated. Moreover, managing individual disorders can be more complex when they co-exist. Therefore, it is important to understand the pathophysiological interlink between these infections and MAFLD when they co-exist to plan appropriate management which is the aim of this clinical update review.

MAFLD and chronic HBV infection

Epidemiology

According to the World Health Organization (WHO) report from 2015, more than 250 million people globally were suffering from chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection7. Additionally, 887,000 people died from complications related to CHB including cirrhosis and liver cancer in the same year. This data underscores the immense burden that CHB places on global public health. There is no direct evidence that CHB is associated with an increased risk of hepatic steatosis. Several meta-analyses have examined this phenomenon. In a meta-analysis of 17 studies which included 4,100 HBV-infected patients and 8 of which also included 945 HCV-infected patients, it was reported that approximately 29.6% of patients with HBV developed fatty liver, like that of the general population8. The same study observed that 60% of the patients with HCV developed fatty liver. Moreover, the study observed a statistically significant positive association with the male sex (OR 1.74, 95%CI [1.28-2.38], P <0.001) and body mass index (SMD 2.17, 95%CI [1.23, 3.11], P <0.001); and a negative association with HBV-DNA (SMD -74.12, 95%CI [-82.93, -65.31], P <0.001). This strong negative association between HBV-DNA and steatosis may indicate a protective effect of HBV infection on steatosis. Another meta-analysis of 54 studies involving 28,648 CHB patients found a pooled prevalence of hepatic steatosis of up to 32.8%9. A more recent meta-analysis, which included 98 studies and 48, 472 patients, demonstrated an even higher global prevalence of hepatic steatosis among CHB patients, reaching 34.93%10.

Effect of MAFLD on CHB infection and chronic liver disease progression:

MAFLD is associated with increased Th17 cell-related gene expression, increased IL-21 levels, activation of T as well as B cells, production of inflammatory cytokines, and elimination of HBV proliferation with resultant immune clearance of HBV DNA, and HbeAg11. NASH stage of MAFLD is associated with increased expression of Toll-like receptors (TLRs) in hepatocytes, kupffer cells (KCs), hepatic stellate cells (HSCs), sinusoidal endothelial cells, and hepatic dendritic cells (DCs)12. Lipopolysaccharide (LPA) induces activation of the TLR4 and the myeloid differentiation factor 88 (MyD88)-mediated pathways in obese individuals13. Activation of the TLR4/Myd88 pathway contributes to the activation of HSCs, and the production of chemokines which in turn recruits further KCs14. TLR4 activation in KCs induces the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1, IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α, and chemokines) and profibrogenic factors (TGF-β) to activate the inflammation-fibrosis-carcinoma sequence14. The TLR4/MyD88 signaling also induces the production of IFN-β, IL-6, and TNF-α to inhibit HBV replication13. Thus, activation of innate immunity through TLR signaling is associated with the inhibition of HBV replication and the retardation of the progression of MAFLD to NASH, fibrosis, and HCC15.
MAFLD-associated metabolic stress could reduce peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma coactivator 1 alpha (PGC-1α) which in turn could inhibit HBV replication and induce Fas-mediated apoptosis of HBV-infected cells resulting in HBV-clearance and reduction of HBV-related liver disease progression16. CHB is associated with a decreased risk of hyperlipidemia17,18 and raised serum adiponectin levels19, both of which could contribute to a lower risk of hepatic steatosis.
On the other hand, the production of saturated fatty acid - palmitic acid as a metabolic component of MAFLD could be associated with impaired function of hepatic DCs, and impaired HBsAg processing/presentation leading to inadequate immune response/HBV-clearance, and thereby development of severe HBV-related liver disease progression20. Neutrophil-derived reactive oxygen species (ROS) induced by MAFLD could result in the activation of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), which in turn could augment HBV replication and result in the progression of MAFLD to NASH21.

Effects of CHB infection on the MAFLD and chronic liver disease progression

Some of the transcription factors (including CEBP22, CREB23, HNF324, HNF425, FXR26, RXR27, and PPAR28) involved in the transcription of HBV DNA are involved in the hepatic glucose, lipids, bile acid, and xenobiotic metabolism28 may either inhibit or induce regeneration, inflammation, fibrosis, and malignant transformation of hepatic cells. Differential expressions of IL-13, G-CSF, CCL11, IL-6, and IL-4 are thought to play a role in developing steatosis and fibrosis in patients with CHB infection. IL-13 facilitates hepatic steatosis and fibrosis, the latter through mechanisms including the stimulation of TGF-β1 gene expression29 and through activation of the JAK-STAT-6 pathway that in turn results in the production of CCL11, an eosinophil chemotactic protein30. The CCL11-mediated hepatic eosinophilic infiltration and activation results in hepatic steatosis and fibrosis31. G-CSF ameliorates hepatic steatosis by reducing the expression of SREBP-1c32. IL-4 and IL-6 protect against hepatic fibrosis33, IL-4 through secretion of matrix metalloproteinase-12 (MMP-12)34, and IL-6 through the promotion of proliferation/survival of HSCs35.
In patients with CHB infection, Hepatitis B protein X (HBx) – a 17 kDa soluble protein coded by the HBV DNA induces expression of various genes related to lipid accumulation including PPAR36, SREBP36, FABP137, LXR38, and FATP239, thereby promoting lipogenesis. HBx also stimulates various transcription factors including STAT3, NF-κβ, PI3K/AKT, and Src40, which in turn promote hepatocyte proliferation40, inhibit apoptosis40, and stimulate inflammation41, thereby leading to the development of HCC. Moreover, the pre-S1 domain of the HBV envelope binds to Sodium Taurocholate Cotransporting Polypeptide (NCTP), limiting the function of NCTP, thereby promoting compensatory bile acid synthesis, cholesterol provision, and hepatic steatosis42.
Steatosis associated with MAFLD, and the resultant oxidative stress might generate an intra-hepatic pro-fibrotic and pro-cancerous environment43. Additionally, CHB-associated deficiency of PML (promyelocytic leukemia protein) results in altered lipid metabolism and steatosis-associated carcinogenesis44. Finally, reduced levels of global DNA methylation in patients with concurrent MAFLD and CHB lead to chromosomal abnormality, instability, fragility, and HCC development45.

Complications

Hepatic steatosis was observed in nearly 18% of patients with biopsy-proven CHB infection46. Steatosis had an independent association with body mass index and fasting blood glucose levels, and it has no correlation with the degree of hepatic fibrosis46. There is a possible genetic susceptibility to develop steatosis in CHB infection, with the rs1010023 polymorphism in PNPLA3 gene and rs58542926 polymorphism in TM6SF2 gene increasing the tendency to develop MAFLD among patients with CHB infection43. HBx could play an important role in increasing the risk of HBV-induced steatosis. On the other hand, the reduced risk of hyperlipidemia and the increased adiponectin levels could reduce the risk of HBV-induced steatosis. Although MAFLD is associated with lower HBV viral load and with an increased rate of HBsAg clearance, both CHB and MAFLD could act synergistically to promote the progression of liver disease causing hepatocyte injury, inflammation, fibrosis, and HCC. A co-occurrence of CHB and MAFLD poses a significant risk of the above-mentioned complications.
A retrospective study involving 1076 CHB patients with a median follow-up period of 9.8 years evaluated the importance of MAFLD in patients with CHB47. The study observed that MAFLD is associated with reduced event-free (aHR 2.00, 95% CI 1.26-3.19), HCC-free (aHR 1.93, 95% CI 1.17-3.21), and transplant-free survival (aHR 1.80, 95% CI 0.98-3.29) implying higher risk for liver-related events and death. A prospective study of 10,546 CHB patients observed that after a median follow-up period of 5.1 years, MAFLD is associated with a 58% reduced risk of HCC (adjusted hazard ratio or aHR 0.42, 95% CI 0.25-0.68, p <0.001)48. The steatosis and metabolic dysfunction had distinctive effects on the risk for HCC. While steatosis was protective against HCC (aHR 0.45, 95% CI 0.30-0.67, p <0.001), a greater burden of metabolic dysfunction increased the HCC risk (aHR 1.40 per dysfunction increase, 95% CI 1.19-1.66, p <0.001)48. MAFLD can have both metabolic and non-metabolic complications in patients with co-existing CHB as given in Table 1.
Figure 1. shows the pathobiological interlink between chronic HBV infection and the stages of MAFLD.
Figure 1. shows the pathobiological interlink between chronic HBV infection and the stages of MAFLD.
Preprints 90341 g001

Management

The management of MAFLD in patients with CHB involves a multifaceted approach. Traditional liver biopsy, considered the gold standard for diagnosis of hepatic steatosis, is associated with a high risk of internal bleeding55, making non–invasive methods a more appropriate approach. One such method is the controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) by fibro-scan56,57, which measures attenuation during ultrasonography to estimate the degree of steatosis. CAP offers a relatively low cost and is suitable for most first-line clinical settings58. In CHB patients CAP demonstrated a high degree of accuracy for steatosis assessment compared to other noninvasive methods59,60. It has been used in predicting the presence and severity of MAFLD in CHB patients61.
CHB management requires antiviral treatments such as nucleotide analogs like tenofovir alafenamide, or entecavir to suppress viral replication62, although cure is often difficult. Patients with concurrent MAFLD may experience variations in viral activity and liver enzymes due to the presence of NASH63. Conflicting evidence exists in the response to treatment in patients with coexistent MAFLD and CHB. While some studies indicate lower treatment response in CHB patients with hepatic steatosis, others show comparable responses. Monitoring serum ALT and HBV DNA levels and timely intervention for poor responders are crucial for managing CHB in the presence of MAFLD64,65.
Acute intervention for concurrent MAFLD is crucial, given its adverse impact on overall health. Lifestyle modifications, including strict diet control aiming at weight loss, adherence to certain dietary practices such as a hypocaloric diet, and avoidance of food with high saturated fats or ultra-processed foods coupled with regular exercise, form the cornerstones of therapy66,67. Several pharmacological treatment options for steatohepatitis are currently being developed, such as Semaglutide68, Lanifibranor (pan-peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonist)69, Resmetirom (selective thyroid hormone receptor-β agonist)70,71 and Obeticholic acid (selective farnesoid X receptor agonist)72,73, with some promising results, but their routine use in CHB patient with concurrent MAFLD requires further evaluation.
Improvement of hepatic steatosis may affect HBV replication, necessitating careful monitoring during metabolic correction. Factors like diabetes mellitus, obesity, and dyslipidemia contribute to the progression of both MAFLD and CHB infection74, making their aggressive management of both conditions essential. These metabolic risk factors are independently associated with liver disease progression, hepatocarcinogenesis, and overall mortality in CHB patients75,76. Therefore, addressing metabolic dysfunction is the key to improving coexistent CHB in patients with MAFLD.

MAFLD and chronic HCV infection

Epidemiology

According to global estimates, approximately 71.1 million people have chronic hepatitis C virus infection, with a global prevalence of 1% in 2015.77 Globally, the most common HCV genotype is genotype 1 (nearly 50% of all adults with HCV infection), followed by genotypes 3, 2, 4, 6, and 5 respectively78. HCV infection, especially genotype 3, is well known to be associated with hepatic steatosis. Genotype 3 is highly steatogenic79 and it exhibits a steatosis prevalence of up to 86% while other phenotypes possess a steatosis prevalence of around 50%80. The mean prevalence of steatosis in chronic HCV is around 55% across all HCV genotypes.80 HCV genotype 3 is reported to exert a direct cytopathic effect on the liver in direct proportion to the viral load, even in the absence of other metabolic risk factors like visceral obesity and/or diabetes mellitus.7 The term ‘viral steatosis’ is used for this entity.80
With the change in nomenclature from NAFLD to MAFLD, those patients with HCV infection who are also meeting the criteria for the diagnosis of MAFLD are classified as hepatitis C with MAFLD. Thus, there are now two types of HCV: hepatitis C with MAFLD and hepatitis C without MAFLD. The term ‘metabolic steatosis’ is used for the entity seen in patients with hepatitis C and MAFLD.80 Contrary to metabolic steatosis, ‘viral steatosis’ is associated with reduced LDL cholesterol and triglyceride levels81. Genotypes 1, 2, and 4 essentially promote insulin resistance associated with host metabolic risk factors including visceral obesity79. MAFLD patients with hepatitis C have a higher risk for advanced hepatic fibrosis but with a similar atherosclerotic CVD risk in comparison to those with MAFLD alone without CHC infection (CHC)82.
A recent Australian study83 observed a 43.1% prevalence of MAFLD in patients with CHC infection in contrast to the global prevalence of MAFLD of 25% in the general population84. This dual etiology group is associated with an increased risk for hepatic injury, inflammation, and fibrosis (all P <0.001). This study observed that those with CHC and lean MAFLD have a similar rate of advanced fibrosis (31.6%) in comparison to those who have obesity and/or diabetes mellitus (31.8% and 46.2% respectively with P=0.325). However, those with dual etiology are at a greater risk of developing advanced fibrosis and HCC even after HCV clearance, implying that managing MAFLD is equally important as HCV clearance to prevent the progression of hepatic disease and death from HCC or cardiovascular disease84.

Disease characteristics

Table 2. shows the differences between HCV genotype 3 and other genotypes of HCV in their pathobiological characteristics, response to treatment and disease outcomes on long-term follow up.

Effect of MAFLD on CHC infection and chronic liver disease progression:

Lipid droplets are involved in the replication and virion assembly of the HCV and stimulation of de novo lipogenesis (DNL) by MAFLD (and CHC) facilitates entry of virus into the hepatocytes86. Moreover, on release from hepatocytes, the mature HCVs in circulation are complexed with lipoproteins87. A complex metabolic network exists in the fatty liver to regulate HCV replication. While saturated and monounsaturated fatty acids are required for replication, polyunsaturated fatty acids inhibit HCV RNA replication88. Lipid peroxidation – a feature of NASH, inhibits HCV replication89. HCV-infected cells have phosphatidylcholines and triglycerides with longer fatty acyl chains90. Knocking down fatty acid elongases90, fatty acid desaturases90, or phosphatidyl ethanolamine transferase91 (PEMT) can inhibit HCV RNA replication.

Effect of CHC infection on the MAFLD and chronic liver disease progression:

Development of MAFLD in patients with CHC depends on the host’s genetic background including the rs738409 polymorphism in the PNPLA3 gene and the rs58542926 polymorphism in TM6SF2 gene92. The CHC infection appears to downregulate the intrahepatic expression of PPAR-α, and its target known as carnitine palmitoyl acyl-CoA transferase 1A (CPT1A), thereby reducing the fatty acid β-oxidation93. The presence of HCV core protein results in mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, and disruption of fatty acid metabolism leading to steatosis94. MAFLD from genotypes 1 and 4 are associated with insulin resistance mediated by reduced expression of insulin receptor substrate (IRS1 and IRS2), thereby reducing signaling through phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) and Akt95. Insulin resistance is also mediated by an increased hepatic expression of fatty acid transporter (CD36), which is involved in increasing fatty acid uptake96.
The MAFLD from genotype 3 is associated with the inhibition of microsomal triglyceride transfer protein (MTTP) resulting in the impaired assembly of ApoB and lipids to form VLDL, thereby impairing triglyceride secretion and thus intracellular triglyceride accumulation in hepatocytes97. Another pathophysiological mechanism for MAFLD from genotype 3 is that HCV-3a core protein induces the PI3K-Akt pathway, increases the Sterol Regulatory Element-binding Protein-1c (SREBP-1c) activity which in turn increases the expression of the fatty acid synthase (FAS)98. The HCV-3a core protein results in the downregulation of phosphatase and tensin (PTEN) homologs inside the hepatocytes triggering the formation of large lipid droplets99. The HCV-3a core protein acts as an inhibitor of PPAR-α activity resulting in lowered triglyceride breakdown and intrahepatic accumulation of fatty acids100.
The inhibition of PPAR-α activity that accompanies CHC infection increases the nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) and activator protein 1 (AP-1) levels leading to the progression of MAFLD to NASH101. Similarly, the increased levels of soluble TNF-α receptors that develop in CHC infection also can cause progression to NASH102. The Kupffer cells exposed to HCV secrete CCL5, which in turn triggers NF-κB and ERK signaling in hepatic stellate cells. The resultant pro-inflammatory (NLRP3, IL1B, IL-6, and CCL5) and pro-fibrotic (TGF-β1, COL4A1, MMP2, and α-SMA) products promote the progression of MAFLD to fibrosis in patients with CHC infection103.

Complications

CHC patients could develop insulin resistance, hyperinsulinemia, and hyperglycemia. This could occur independently from obesity but is associated with higher HCV replication rate and an enhanced risk of progression to fibrosis. Host factors including obesity, insulin resistance due to obesity, and coexistent MAFLD in patients with CHC infection are associated with a higher degree of hepatic fibrosis, increased risk of HCC, a reduced response to interferon alpha-based therapy, and accelerated atherosclerosis in comparison to CHC infection without MAFLD104-107. However, results from the German hepatitis C registry do not observe a significant fibrotic progression in patients with co-existent MAFLD and CHC infection108. Figure 2 shows the pathobiological interlink between chronic HCV infection and the stages of MAFLD.

Management.

Obesity is well known to trigger the development of MAFLD and the progression of CHC infection. Though in the interferon era of CHC treatment obesity was a hindrance to achieving SVR106, in the era of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy this is no longer the case109. In a prospective study comprising 11,469 patients with CHC infection, up to 78% of patients were either overweight or obese at the treatment initiation110. After a follow-up of 2 years, patients who managed to achieve SVR gained 0.56 ± 12.8 lbs compared to 3.43 ± 14.6 lbs weight loss in those who failed to achieve SVR (p <0.0001). Moreover, 22% of CHC patients with BMI ≤25 at DAA therapy onset, became overweight during follow-up110.
In 1991 the FDA approved IFN-α as the first antiviral medication for HCV and seven years later ribavirin was introduced111. A few years later, three different combinations of DAAs including NS3 protease inhibitors, NS5B polymerase inhibitors, and NS5A inhibitors were approved112. The combination of IFN-α and ribavirin decreased the SVR in patients with CHC infection113. Adding rosuvastatin to this combination could improve the SVR rates with a reduction in steatosis and fibrosis114. Though statins are a viable option, further randomized controlled trials are needed. A combination of IFN-α and vitamin E could achieve a significant reduction in the viral load115. In CHC patients who are refractory to IFN-α therapy, the addition of an antioxidant d-α-tocopherol reduced the rate of progression of fibrosis through inhibition of stellate cell activation116.
DAAs (which are currently the first line agents with improved tolerability and superior efficacy for HCV clearance) achieved a median decrease of liver stiffness measurement (LSM) by 0.9 (-0.6-3.2) kPa, P <0.001, but with a median increase of CAP values by 25 (-12.5-61.5) dB/m, P <0.001, indicating that DAAs could increase the hepatic steatosis117. Though DAAs could achieve HCV clearance, the co-existing MAFLD can persist, particularly in patients with obesity, thereby increasing the risk of progression of hepatic disease. Hence, co-existing MAFLD should be treated with therapeutic lifestyle changes. However, DAAs have added beneficial effect on the cardiovascular risk factors – with increase in the triglyceride-to-cholesterol ratio in the VLDL molecules118, improvement in glycemic control119, and significant reduction in the risk of cardiovascular events120. Due to potential drug-drug interactions, DAAs should be carefully selected with statins or antihypertensive drugs121.

Areas of uncertainty/emerging concepts

Co-existing CHB infection and MAFLD are becoming increasingly common, and it is important to identify the etiology when hepatitis develops. A novel non-invasive diagnostic model is developed using various parameters including CAP, LSM, HBV DNA, and AST in predicting HBV-related inflammation in CHB with concurrent MAFLD to identify patients who need anti-HBV therapy122. Uncertainty and challenges exist in the management of patients with co-existing CHB and MAFLD in the absence of long-term follow up data. Though there are inconsistent results on the impact of hepatic steatosis on the efficacy of antiviral therapy for CHB (with some showing reduced and others showing comparable therapy response) and there are insufficient data to confirm a direct link between nucleoside analogues and hepatic steatosis, the onset/progression of MAFLD should be monitored as a potential adverse effect123. Antiviral drugs may have effects on the metabolism. For example, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate could significantly reduce the lipoprotein levels in patients CHB124. Statins could retard the decompensation of HBV-associated cirrhosis125 and HCC126. As PPAR-α could promote HBV replication127, they should be cautioned when CHB coexist with MAFLD. The following table (Table 3) summarizes some of the answered and unanswered topics related to co-existent chronic viral hepatitis and MAFLD.

Conclusion

MAFLD and chronic viral hepatitis from HBV and HCV remain significant challenges to liver health across the globe. Disease progression occurs when MAFLD coexists with HBV or HCV in the same individual resulting in higher complication rates, and the management of either disease becomes more complex. Timely clinical suspicion and appropriate therapeutic interventions might modify the disease outcomes in relation to this dangerous co-existence. More research is needed to improve our understanding regarding the pathobiology and interactions between these diseases when they coexist and the therapeutic strategies to improve the clinical outcomes.

Conflicts of Interest

None Declared.

References

  1. Fouda S, Jeeyavudeen MS, Pappachan JM, Jayanthi V. Pathobiology of Metabolic-Associated Fatty Liver Disease. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2023 Sep;52(3):405-416. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Tanaka N, Kimura T, Fujimori N, Nagaya T, Komatsu M, Tanaka E. Current status, problems, and perspectives of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease research. World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Jan 14;25(2):163-177. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Eslam M, Sanyal AJ, George J; International Consensus Panel. MAFLD: A Consensus-Driven Proposed Nomenclature for Metabolic Associated Fatty Liver Disease. Gastroenterology. 2020 May;158(7):1999-2014.e1. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Crane H, Gofton C, Sharma A, George J. MAFLD: an optimal framework for understanding liver cancer phenotypes. J Gastroenterol. 2023 Jul 20. Epub ahead of print. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Baclig MO, Reyes KG, Liles VR, Mapua CA, Dimamay MPS, Gopez-Cervantes J. Hepatic steatosis in chronic hepatitis B: a study of metabolic and genetic factors. Int J Mol Epidemiol Genet. 2018 Apr 5;9(2):13-19. [PubMed]
  6. Asselah T, Rubbia-Brandt L, Marcellin P, Negro F. Steatosis in chronic hepatitis C: why does it really matter? Gut. 2006 Jan;55(1):123-30. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Younossi Z, Tacke F, Arrese M, Chander Sharma B, Mostafa I, Bugianesi E, Wai-Sun Wong V, Yilmaz Y, George J, Fan J, Vos MB. Global Perspectives on Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis. Hepatology. 2019 Jun;69(6):2672-2682. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Machado MV, Oliveira AG, Cortez-Pinto H. Hepatic steatosis in hepatitis B virus infected patients: meta-analysis of risk factors and comparison with hepatitis C infected patients. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Sep;26(9):1361-7. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Zheng Q, Zou B, Wu Y, Yeo Y, Wu H, Stave CD, Cheung RC, Nguyen MH. Systematic review with meta-analysis: prevalence of hepatic steatosis, fibrosis and associated factors in chronic hepatitis B. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Nov;54(9):1100-1109. Epub 2021 Sep 1. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Jiang D, Chen C, Liu X, Huang C, Yan D, Zhang X, Zhou Y, Lin Y, Zhou Y, Guan Z, Ding C, Lan L, Zhu C, Wu J, Li L, Yang S. Concurrence and impact of hepatic steatosis on chronic hepatitis B patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Transl Med. 2021 Dec;9(23):1718. PMCID: PMC8743703. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Li HJ, Kang FB, Li BS, Yang XY, Zhang YG, Sun DX. Interleukin-21 inhibits HBV replication in vitro. Antivir Ther. 2015;20(6):583-90. Epub 2015 Mar 16. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kiziltas S. Toll-like receptors in pathophysiology of liver diseases. World J Hepatol. 2016 Nov 18;8(32):1354-1369. PMCID: PMC5114472. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zhang RN, Pan Q, Zhang Z, Cao HX, Shen F, Fan JG. Saturated Fatty Acid inhibits viral replication in chronic hepatitis B virus infection with nonalcoholic Fatty liver disease by toll-like receptor 4-mediated innate immune response. Hepat Mon. 2015 May 23;15(5):e27909. PMCID: PMC4451278. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Seki E, De Minicis S, Osterreicher CH, Kluwe J, Osawa Y, Brenner DA, Schwabe RF. TLR4 enhances TGF-beta signaling and hepatic fibrosis. Nat Med. 2007 Nov;13(11):1324-32. Epub 2007 Oct 21. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Soares JB, Pimentel-Nunes P, Afonso L, Rolanda C, Lopes P, Roncon-Albuquerque R Jr, Gonçalves N, Boal-Carvalho I, Pardal F, Lopes S, Macedo G, Lara-Santos L, Henrique R, Moreira-Dias L, Gonçalves R, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Leite-Moreira AF. Increased hepatic expression of TLR2 and TLR4 in the hepatic inflammation-fibrosis-carcinoma sequence. Innate Immun. 2012 Oct;18(5):700-8. Epub 2012 Feb 13. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Piccinin E, Villani G, Moschetta A. Metabolic aspects in NAFLD, NASH and hepatocellular carcinoma: the role of PGC1 coactivators. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Mar;16(3):160-174. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Huang CY, Lu CW, Liu YL, Chiang CH, Lee LT, Huang KC. Relationship between chronic hepatitis B and metabolic syndrome: A structural equation modeling approach. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2016 Feb;24(2):483-9. Epub 2015 Dec 31. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Jarčuška P, Janičko M, Kružliak P, Novák M, Veselíny E, Fedačko J, Senajová G, Dražilová S, Madarasová-Gecková A, Mareková M, Pella D, Siegfried L, Kristián P, Kolesárová E; HepaMeta Study Group. Hepatitis B virus infection in patients with metabolic syndrome: a complicated relationship. Results of a population based study. Eur J Intern Med. 2014 Mar;25(3):286-91. Epub 2014 Jan 17. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Yoon S, Jung J, Kim T, Park S, Chwae YJ, Shin HJ, Kim K. Adiponectin, a downstream target gene of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ, controls hepatitis B virus replication. Virology. 2011 Jan 20;409(2):290-8. Epub 2010 Nov 6. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Martinet J, Dufeu-Duchesne T, Bruder Costa J, Larrat S, Marlu A, Leroy V, Plumas J, Aspord C. Altered functions of plasmacytoid dendritic cells and reduced cytolytic activity of natural killer cells in patients with chronic HBV infection. Gastroenterology. 2012 Dec;143(6):1586-1596.e8. Epub 2012 Sep 6. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Chang WW, Su IJ, Chang WT, Huang W, Lei HY. Suppression of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in human hepatoma cell: the antiviral role of nitric oxide. J Viral Hepat. 2008 Jul;15(7):490-7. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. López-Cabrera M, Letovsky J, Hu KQ, Siddiqui A. Multiple liver-specific factors bind to the hepatitis B virus core/pregenomic promoter: trans-activation and repression by CCAAT/enhancer binding protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Jul;87(13):5069-73. PMCID: PMC54263. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Kim BK, Lim SO, Park YG. Requirement of the cyclic adenosine monophosphate response element-binding protein for hepatitis B virus replication. Hepatology. 2008 Aug;48(2):361-73. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Raney AK, Zhang P, McLachlan A. Regulation of transcription from the hepatitis B virus large surface antigen promoter by hepatocyte nuclear factor 3. J Virol. 1995 Jun;69(6):3265-72. PMCID: PMC189037. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Yu X, Mertz JE. Distinct modes of regulation of transcription of hepatitis B virus by the nuclear receptors HNF4alpha and COUP-TF1. J Virol. 2003 Feb;77(4):2489-99. PMCID: PMC141100. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Ramière C, Scholtès C, Diaz O, Icard V, Perrin-Cocon L, Trabaud MA, Lotteau V, André P. Transactivation of the hepatitis B virus core promoter by the nuclear receptor FXRalpha. J Virol. 2008 Nov;82(21):10832-40. Epub 2008 Sep 3. PMCID: PMC2573182. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Reese VC, Oropeza CE, McLachlan A. Independent activation of hepatitis B virus biosynthesis by retinoids, peroxisome proliferators, and bile acids. J Virol. 2013 Jan;87(2):991-7. Epub 2012 Nov 7. PMCID: PMC3554059. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Tang H, McLachlan A. Transcriptional regulation of hepatitis B virus by nuclear hormone receptors is a critical determinant of viral tropism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Feb 13;98(4):1841-6. Epub 2001 Feb 6. PMCID: PMC29344. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Lee CG, Homer RJ, Zhu Z, Lanone S, Wang X, Koteliansky V, Shipley JM, Gotwals P, Noble P, Chen Q, Senior RM, Elias JA. Interleukin-13 induces tissue fibrosis by selectively stimulating and activating transforming growth factor beta(1). J Exp Med. 2001 Sep 17;194(6):809-21. PMCID: PMC2195954. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Tarantino G, Cabibi D, Cammà C, Alessi N, Donatelli M, Petta S, Craxì A, Di Marco V. Liver eosinophilic infiltrate is a significant finding in patients with chronic hepatitis C. J Viral Hepat. 2008 Jul;15(7):523-30. Epub 2008 Feb 5. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Tacke F, Trautwein C, Yagmur E, Hellerbrand C, Wiest R, Brenner DA, Schnabl B. Up-regulated eotaxin plasma levels in chronic liver disease patients indicate hepatic inflammation, advanced fibrosis and adverse clinical course. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Aug;22(8):1256-64. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Song YS, Fang CH, So BI, Park JY, Jun DW, Kim KS. Therapeutic effects of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor on non-alcoholic hepatic steatosis in the rat. Ann Hepatol. 2013 Jan-Feb;12(1):115-22. [PubMed]
  33. Wong SW, Ting YW, Yong YK, Tan HY, Barathan M, Riazalhosseini B, Bee CJ, Tee KK, Larsson M, Velu V, Shankar EM, Mohamed R. Chronic inflammation involves CCL11 and IL-13 to facilitate the development of liver cirrhosis and fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2021 Apr;81(2):147-159. Epub 2021 Feb 2. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Weng SY, Wang X, Vijayan S, Tang Y, Kim YO, Padberg K, Regen T, Molokanova O, Chen T, Bopp T, Schild H, Brombacher F, Crosby JR, McCaleb ML, Waisman A, Bockamp E, Schuppan D. IL-4 Receptor Alpha Signaling through Macrophages Differentially Regulates Liver Fibrosis Progression and Reversal. EBioMedicine. 2018 Mar;29:92-103. Epub 2018 Feb 17. PMCID: PMC5925448. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Nieto N. Oxidative-stress and IL-6 mediate the fibrogenic effects of [corrected] Kupffer cells on stellate cells. Hepatology. 2006 Dec;44(6):1487-501. Erratum in: Hepatology. 2007 Feb;45(2):546. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Kim KH, Shin HJ, Kim K, Choi HM, Rhee SH, Moon HB, Kim HH, Yang US, Yu DY, Cheong J. Hepatitis B virus X protein induces hepatic steatosis via transcriptional activation of SREBP1 and PPAR-gamma. Gastroenterology. 2007 May;132(5):1955-67. Epub 2007 Mar 24. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Wu YL, Peng XE, Zhu YB, Yan XL, Chen WN, Lin X. Hepatitis B virus X Protein induces hepatic steatosis by enhancing the expression of liver fatty acid binding protein. J Virol. 2015 Dec 4;90(4):1729-40. PMCID: PMC4733992. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Na TY, Shin YK, Roh KJ, Kang SA, Hong I, Oh SJ, Seong JK, Park CK, Choi YL, Lee MO. Liver X receptor mediates hepatitis B virus X protein-induced lipogenesis in hepatitis B virus-associated hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2009 Apr;49(4):1122-31. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Lu Y, Yang X, Kuang Q, Wu Y, Tan X, Lan J, Qiang Z, Feng T. HBx induced upregulation of FATP2 promotes the development of hepatic lipid accumulation. Exp Cell Res. 2023 Sep 1;430(1):113721. Epub 2023 Jul 10. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Sivasudhan E, Blake N, Lu Z, Meng J, Rong R. Hepatitis B Viral Protein HBx and the Molecular Mechanisms Modulating the Hallmarks of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Comprehensive Review. Cells. 2022 Feb 21;11(4):741. PMCID: PMC8870387. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Cho HK, Kim SY, Yoo SK, Choi YH, Cheong J. Fatty acids increase hepatitis B virus X protein stabilization and HBx-induced inflammatory gene expression. FEBS J. 2014 May;281(9):2228-39. Epub 2014 Apr 7. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Oehler N, Volz T, Bhadra OD, Kah J, Allweiss L, Giersch K, Bierwolf J, Riecken K, Pollok JM, Lohse AW, Fehse B, Petersen J, Urban S, Lütgehetmann M, Heeren J, Dandri M. Binding of hepatitis B virus to its cellular receptor alters the expression profile of genes of bile acid metabolism. Hepatology. 2014 Nov;60(5):1483-93. Epub 2014 May 19. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Tong X, Song Y, Yin S, Wang J, Huang R, Wu C, Shi J, Li J. Clinical impact and mechanisms of hepatitis B virus infection concurrent with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Chin Med J (Engl). 2022 Jul 20;135(14):1653-1663. PMCID: PMC9509100. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Chung YL, Wu ML. The role of promyelocytic leukemia protein in steatosis-associated hepatic tumors related to chronic hepatitis B virus Infection. Transl Oncol. 2018 Jun;11(3):743-754. Epub 2018 Apr 24. PMCID: PMC6050444. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Li F, Ou Q, Lai Z, Pu L, Chen X, Wang L, Sun L, Liang X, Wang Y, Xu H, Wei J, Wu F, Zhu H, Wang L. The co-occurrence of chronic hepatitis B and fibrosis is associated with a decrease in hepatic global DNA methylation levels in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Front Genet. 2021 Jul 14;12:671552. PMCID: PMC8318039. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Thomopoulos KC, Arvaniti V, Tsamantas AC, Dimitropoulou D, Gogos CA, Siagris D, Theocharis GJ, Labropoulou-Karatza C. Prevalence of liver steatosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B: a study of associated factors and of relationship with fibrosis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006 Mar;18(3):233-7. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. van Kleef LA, Choi HSJ, Brouwer WP, Hansen BE, Patel K, de Man RA, Janssen HLA, de Knegt RJ, Sonneveld MJ. Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease increases risk of adverse outcomes in patients with chronic hepatitis B. JHEP Rep. 2021 Aug 8;3(5):100350. PMCID: PMC8446794. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Huang SC, Su TH, Tseng TC, Chen CL, Hsu SJ, Liao SH, Hong CM, Liu CH, Lan TY, Yang HC, Liu CJ, Chen PJ, Kao JH. Distinct effects of hepatic steatosis and metabolic dysfunction on the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic hepatitis B. Hepatol Int. 2023 Oct;17(5):1139-1149. Epub 2023 May 29. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Kim K, Choi S, Park SM. Association of fasting serum glucose level and type 2 diabetes with hepatocellular carcinoma in men with chronic hepatitis B infection: A large cohort study. Eur J Cancer. 2018 Oct;102:103-113. Epub 2018 Sep 4. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Kang SH, Cho Y, Jeong SW, Kim SU, Lee JW; Korean NAFLD Study Group. From nonalcoholic fatty liver disease to metabolic-associated fatty liver disease: Big wave or ripple? Clin Mol Hepatol. 2021 Apr;27(2):257-269. Epub 2021 Mar 22. PMCID: PMC8046627. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Wang X, Wei S, Wei Y, Wang X, Xiao F, Feng Y, Zhu Q. The impact of concomitant metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease on adverse outcomes in patients with hepatitis B cirrhosis: a propensity score matching study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Aug 1;35(8):889-898. Epub 2023 Jun 6. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Zhang P, Liu Z, Fan H, Shi T, Han X, Suo C, Chen X, Zhang T. Positive hepatitis B core antibody is associated with advanced fibrosis and mortality in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Mar 1;35(3):294-301. Epub 2022 Dec 8. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Kim D, Konyn P, Sandhu KK, Dennis BB, Cheung AC, Ahmed A. Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease is associated with increased all-cause mortality in the United States. J Hepatol. 2021 Dec;75(6):1284-1291. Epub 2021 Aug 8. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Cai J, Zhang XJ, Ji YX, Zhang P, She ZG, Li H. Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Pandemic Fuels the Upsurge in Cardiovascular Diseases. Circ Res. 2020 Feb 28;126(5):679-704. Epub 2020 Feb 27. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Tapper EB, Lok AS. Use of Liver Imaging and Biopsy in Clinical Practice. N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 24;377(8):756-768. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Middleton MS, Heba ER, Hooker CA, Bashir MR, Fowler KJ, Sandrasegaran K, Brunt EM, Kleiner DE, Doo E, Van Natta ML, Lavine JE, Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Sanyal A, Loomba R, Sirlin CB; NASH Clinical Research Network. Agreement Between Magnetic Resonance Imaging Proton Density Fat Fraction Measurements and Pathologist-Assigned Steatosis Grades of Liver Biopsies From Adults With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis. Gastroenterology. 2017 Sep;153(3):753-761. Epub 2017 Jun 15. PMCID: PMC5695870. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Gu J, Liu S, Du S, Zhang Q, Xiao J, Dong Q, Xin Y. Diagnostic value of MRI-PDFF for hepatic steatosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 2019 Jul;29(7):3564-3573. Epub 2019 Mar 21. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Karlas T, Petroff D, Sasso M, Fan JG, Mi YQ, de Lédinghen V, Kumar M, Lupsor-Platon M, Han KH, Cardoso AC, Ferraioli G, Chan WK, Wong VW, Myers RP, Chayama K, Friedrich-Rust M, Beaugrand M, Shen F, Hiriart JB, Sarin SK, Badea R, Jung KS, Marcellin P, Filice C, Mahadeva S, Wong GL, Crotty P, Masaki K, Bojunga J, Bedossa P, Keim V, Wiegand J. Individual patient data meta-analysis of controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) technology for assessing steatosis. J Hepatol. 2017 May;66(5):1022-1030. Epub 2016 Dec 28. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Xu L, Lu W, Li P, Shen F, Mi YQ, Fan JG. A comparison of hepatic steatosis index, controlled attenuation parameter and ultrasound as noninvasive diagnostic tools for steatosis in chronic hepatitis B. Dig Liver Dis. 2017 Aug;49(8):910-917. Epub 2017 Mar 30. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Liang J, Liu F, Wang F, Han T, Jing L, Ma Z, Gao Y. A Noninvasive Score Model for Prediction of NASH in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:8793278. Epub 2017 Mar 2. PMCID: PMC5352864. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Newsome PN, Sasso M, Deeks JJ, Paredes A, Boursier J, Chan WK, Yilmaz Y, Czernichow S, Zheng MH, Wong VW, Allison M, Tsochatzis E, Anstee QM, Sheridan DA, Eddowes PJ, Guha IN, Cobbold JF, Paradis V, Bedossa P, Miette V, Fournier-Poizat C, Sandrin L, Harrison SA. FibroScan-AST (FAST) score for the non-invasive identification of patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis with significant activity and fibrosis: a prospective derivation and global validation study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Apr;5(4):362-373. Epub 2020 Feb 3. Erratum in: Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Apr;5(4):e3. PMCID: PMC7066580. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Charatcharoenwitthaya P, Pongpaibul A, Kaosombatwattana U, Bhanthumkomol P, Bandidniyamanon W, Pausawasdi N, Tanwandee T. The prevalence of steatohepatitis in chronic hepatitis B patients and its impact on disease severity and treatment response. Liver Int. 2017 Apr;37(4):542-551. Epub 2016 Oct 31. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Li J, Le AK, Chaung KT, Henry L, Hoang JK, Cheung R, Nguyen MH. Fatty liver is not independently associated with the rates of complete response to oral antiviral therapy in chronic hepatitis B patients. Liver Int. 2020 May;40(5):1052-1061. Epub 2020 Mar 15. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Chen J, Wang ML, Long Q, Bai L, Tang H. High value of controlled attenuation parameter predicts a poor antiviral response in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2017 Aug 15;16(4):370-374. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Jin X, Chen YP, Yang YD, Li YM, Zheng L, Xu CQ. Association between hepatic steatosis and entecavir treatment failure in Chinese patients with chronic hepatitis B. PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e34198. Epub 2012 Mar 30. PMCID: PMC3316632. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Younossi ZM, Corey KE, Lim JK. AGA clinical practice update on lifestyle modification using diet and exercise to achieve weight loss in the management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: expert review. Gastroenterology. 2021 Feb;160(3):912-918. Epub 2020 Dec 9. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Dufour JF, Anstee QM, Bugianesi E, Harrison S, Loomba R, Paradis V, Tilg H, Wong VW, Zelber-Sagi S. Current therapies and new developments in NASH. Gut. 2022 Jun 16;71(10):2123–34. Epub ahead of print. PMCID: PMC9484366. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Newsome PN, Buchholtz K, Cusi K, Linder M, Okanoue T, Ratziu V, Sanyal AJ, Sejling AS, Harrison SA; NN9931-4296 Investigators. A placebo-controlled trial of subcutaneous Semaglutide in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. N Engl J Med. 2021 Mar 25;384(12):1113-1124. Epub 2020 Nov 13. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Francque SM, Bedossa P, Ratziu V, Anstee QM, Bugianesi E, Sanyal AJ, Loomba R, Harrison SA, Balabanska R, Mateva L, Lanthier N, Alkhouri N, Moreno C, Schattenberg JM, Stefanova-Petrova D, Vonghia L, Rouzier R, Guillaume M, Hodge A, Romero-Gómez M, Huot-Marchand P, Baudin M, Richard MP, Abitbol JL, Broqua P, Junien JL, Abdelmalek MF; NATIVE Study Group. A randomized, controlled trial of the pan-PPAR agonist Lanifibranor in NASH. N Engl J Med. 2021 Oct 21;385(17):1547-1558. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Harrison SA, Bashir MR, Guy CD, Zhou R, Moylan CA, Frias JP, Alkhouri N, Bansal MB, Baum S, Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Taub R, Moussa SE. Resmetirom (MGL-3196) for the treatment of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2019 Nov 30;394(10213):2012-2024. Epub 2019 Nov 11. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Younossi ZM, Stepanova M, Taub RA, Barbone JM, Harrison SA. Hepatic Fat Reduction Due to Resmetirom in Patients With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Is Associated With Improvement of Quality of Life. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Jun;20(6):1354-1361.e7. Epub 2021 Jul 27. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Younossi ZM, Ratziu V, Loomba R, Rinella M, Anstee QM, Goodman Z, Bedossa P, Geier A, Beckebaum S, Newsome PN, Sheridan D, Sheikh MY, Trotter J, Knapple W, Lawitz E, Abdelmalek MF, Kowdley KV, Montano-Loza AJ, Boursier J, Mathurin P, Bugianesi E, Mazzella G, Olveira A, Cortez-Pinto H, Graupera I, Orr D, Gluud LL, Dufour JF, Shapiro D, Campagna J, Zaru L, MacConell L, Shringarpure R, Harrison S, Sanyal AJ; REGENERATE Study Investigators. Obeticholic acid for the treatment of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: interim analysis from a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2019 Dec 14;394(10215):2184-2196. Epub 2019 Dec 5. Erratum in: Lancet. 2020 Aug 1;396(10247):312. Erratum in: Lancet. 2021 Jun 19;397(10292):2336. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Younossi ZM, Stepanova M, Nader F, Loomba R, Anstee QM, Ratziu V, Harrison S, Sanyal AJ, Schattenberg JM, Barritt AS, Noureddin M, Bonacci M, Cawkwell G, Wong B, Rinella M; Randomized global phase 3 study to evaluate the impact on NASH with fibrosis of obeticholic acid treatment (REGENERATE) Study Investigators. Obeticholic acid impact on quality of life in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: REGENERATE 18-month interim analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Sep;20(9):2050-2058.e12. Epub 2021 Jul 15. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Wong GL, Chan HL, Yu Z, Chan AW, Choi PC, Chim AM, Chan HY, Tse CH, Wong VW. Coincidental metabolic syndrome increases the risk of liver fibrosis progression in patients with chronic hepatitis B--a prospective cohort study with paired transient elastography examinations. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2014 Apr;39(8):883-93. Epub 2014 Feb 20. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Fan R, Niu J, Ma H, Xie Q, Cheng J, Rao H, Dou X, Xie J, Zhao W, Peng J, Gao Z, Gao H, Chen X, Chen J, Li Q, Tang H, Zhang Z, Ren H, Cheng M, Liang X, Zhu C, Wei L, Jia J, Sun J, Hou J; Chronic Hepatitis B Study Consortium. Association of central obesity with hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic hepatitis B receiving antiviral therapy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Aug;54(3):329-338. Epub 2021 Jun 22. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Chan KE, Ng CH, Fu CE, Quek J, Kong G, Goh YJ, Zeng RW, Tseng M, Aggarwal M, Nah B, Chee D, Wong ZY, Zhang S, Wang JW, Chew NWS, Dan YY, Siddiqui MS, Noureddin M, Sanyal AJ, Muthiah M. The Spectrum and Impact of Metabolic Dysfunction in MAFLD: A Longitudinal Cohort Analysis of 32,683 Overweight and Obese Individuals. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Sep;21(10):2560-2569.e15. Epub 2022 Oct 3. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Polaris Observatory HCV Collaborators. Global prevalence and genotype distribution of hepatitis C virus infection in 2015: a modeling study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Mar;2(3):161-176. Epub 2016 Dec 16. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Gower E, Estes C, Blach S, Razavi-Shearer K, Razavi H. Global epidemiology and genotype distribution of the hepatitis C virus infection. J Hepatol. 2014 Nov;61(1 Suppl):S45-57. Epub 2014 Jul 30. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Moucari R, Asselah T, Cazals-Hatem D, Voitot H, Boyer N, Ripault MP, Sobesky R, Martinot-Peignoux M, Maylin S, Nicolas-Chanoine MH, Paradis V, Vidaud M, Valla D, Bedossa P, Marcellin P. Insulin resistance in chronic hepatitis C: association with genotypes 1 and 4, serum HCV RNA level, and liver fibrosis. Gastroenterology. 2008 Feb;134(2):416-23. Epub 2007 Nov 12. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Adinolfi LE, Rinaldi L, Guerrera B, Restivo L, Marrone A, Giordano M, Zampino R. NAFLD and NASH in HCV Infection: Prevalence and Significance in Hepatic and Extrahepatic Manifestations. Int J Mol Sci. 2016 May 25;17(6):803. PMCID: PMC4926337. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Marzouk D, Sass J, Bakr I, El Hosseiny M, Abdel-Hamid M, Rekacewicz C, Chaturvedi N, Mohamed MK, Fontanet A. Metabolic and cardiovascular risk profiles and hepatitis C virus infection in rural Egypt. Gut. 2007 Aug;56(8):1105-10. Epub 2006 Sep 6. PMCID: PMC1955512. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Tsai PS, Cheng YM, Wang CC, Kao JH. The impact of concomitant hepatitis C virus infection on liver and cardiovascular risks in patients with metabolic-associated fatty liver disease. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Nov 1;35(11):1278-1283. Epub 2023 Sep 27. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Al-Omary A, Byth K, Weltman M, George J, Eslam M. The importance and impact of recognizing metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease in patients with chronic hepatitis C. J Dig Dis. 2022 Jan;23(1):33-43. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Younossi Z, A.Q., Marietti M, & al, e. Global burden of NAFLD and NASH: trends, predictions, risk factors, and prevention. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018;15:11–20. [CrossRef]
  85. Negro F. Facts and fictions of HCV and comorbidities: steatosis, diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular diseases. J Hepatol. 2014 Nov;61(1 Suppl):S69-78. Epub 2014 Nov 3. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Miyanari Y, Atsuzawa K, Usuda N, Watashi K, Hishiki T, Zayas M, Bartenschlager R, Wakita T, Hijikata M, Shimotohno K. The lipid droplet is an important organelle for hepatitis C virus production. Nat Cell Biol. 2007 Sep;9(9):1089-97. Epub 2007 Aug 26. Erratum in: Nat Cell Biol. 2007 Oct;9(10):1216. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. André P, Komurian-Pradel F, Deforges S, Perret M, Berland JL, Sodoyer M, Pol S, Bréchot C, Paranhos-Baccalà G, Lotteau V. Characterization of low- and very-low-density hepatitis C virus RNA-containing particles. J Virol. 2002 Jul;76(14):6919-28. PMCID: PMC136313. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Kapadia SB, Chisari FV. Hepatitis C virus RNA replication is regulated by host geranylgeranylation and fatty acids. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Feb 15;102(7):2561-6. Epub 2005 Feb 7. PMCID: PMC549027. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Yamane D, McGivern DR, Wauthier E, Yi M, Madden VJ, Welsch C, Antes I, Wen Y, Chugh PE, McGee CE, Widman DG, Misumi I, Bandyopadhyay S, Kim S, Shimakami T, Oikawa T, Whitmire JK, Heise MT, Dittmer DP, Kao CC, Pitson SM, Merrill AH Jr, Reid LM, Lemon SM. Regulation of the hepatitis C virus RNA replicase by endogenous lipid peroxidation. Nat Med. 2014 Aug;20(8):927-35. Epub 2014 Jul 27. PMCID: PMC4126843. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Hofmann S, Krajewski M, Scherer C, Scholz V, Mordhorst V, Truschow P, Schöbel A, Reimer R, Schwudke D, Herker E. Complex lipid metabolic remodeling is required for efficient hepatitis C virus replication. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Biol Lipids. 2018 Sep;1863(9):1041-1056. Epub 2018 Jun 6. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Abomughaid M, Tay ESE, Pickford R, Malladi C, Read SA, Coorssen JR, Gloss BS, George J, Douglas MW. PEMT Mediates Hepatitis C Virus-Induced Steatosis, Explains Genotype-Specific Phenotypes and Supports Virus Replication. Int J Mol Sci. 2023 May 15;24(10):8781. PMCID: PMC10218061. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Coppola N, Rosa Z, Cirillo G, Stanzione M, Macera M, Boemio A, Grandone A, Pisaturo M, Marrone A, Adinolfi LE, Sagnelli E, Miraglia del Giudice E. TM6SF2 E167K variant is associated with severe steatosis in chronic hepatitis C, regardless of PNPLA3 polymorphism. Liver Int. 2015 Aug;35(8):1959-63. Epub 2015 Jan 27. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Cheng Y, Dharancy S, Malapel M, Desreumaux P. Hepatitis C virus infection down-regulates the expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha and carnitine palmitoyl acyl-CoA transferase 1A. World J Gastroenterol. 2005 Dec 28;11(48):7591-6. PMCID: PMC4727219. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Okuda M, Li K, Beard MR, Showalter LA, Scholle F, Lemon SM, Weinman SA. Mitochondrial injury, oxidative stress, and antioxidant gene expression are induced by hepatitis C virus core protein. Gastroenterology. 2002 Feb;122(2):366-75. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Kawaguchi T, Yoshida T, Harada M, Hisamoto T, Nagao Y, Ide T, Taniguchi E, Kumemura H, Hanada S, Maeyama M, Baba S, Koga H, Kumashiro R, Ueno T, Ogata H, Yoshimura A, Sata M. Hepatitis C virus down-regulates insulin receptor substrates 1 and 2 through up-regulation of suppressor of cytokine signaling 3. Am J Pathol. 2004 Nov;165(5):1499-508. PMCID: PMC1618659. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Miquilena-Colina ME, Lima-Cabello E, Sánchez-Campos S, García-Mediavilla MV, Fernández-Bermejo M, Lozano-Rodríguez T, Vargas-Castrillón J, Buqué X, Ochoa B, Aspichueta P, González-Gallego J, García-Monzón C. Hepatic fatty acid translocase CD36 upregulation is associated with insulin resistance, hyperinsulinaemia and increased steatosis in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and chronic hepatitis C. Gut. 2011 Oct;60(10):1394-402. Epub 2011 Jan 26. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Serfaty L, Andreani T, Giral P, Carbonell N, Chazouillères O, Poupon R. Hepatitis C virus induced hypobetalipoproteinemia: a possible mechanism for steatosis in chronic hepatitis C. J Hepatol. 2001 Mar;34(3):428-34. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Jackel-Cram C, Qiao L, Xiang Z, Brownlie R, Zhou Y, Babiuk L, Liu Q. Hepatitis C virus genotype-3a core protein enhances sterol regulatory element-binding protein-1 activity through the phosphoinositide 3-kinase-Akt-2 pathway. J Gen Virol. 2010 Jun;91(Pt 6):1388-95. Epub 2010 Feb 3. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Clément S, Peyrou M, Sanchez-Pareja A, Bourgoin L, Ramadori P, Suter D, Vinciguerra M, Guilloux K, Pascarella S, Rubbia-Brandt L, Negro F, Foti M. Down-regulation of phosphatase and tensin homolog by hepatitis C virus core 3a in hepatocytes triggers the formation of large lipid droplets. Hepatology. 2011 Jul;54(1):38-49. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. de Gottardi A, Pazienza V, Pugnale P, Bruttin F, Rubbia-Brandt L, Juge-Aubry CE, et al. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha and -gamma mRNA levels are reduced in chronic hepatitis C with steatosis and genotype 3 infection. Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics. 2006;23(1):107–14. [CrossRef]
  101. Dharancy S, Malapel M, Perlemuter G, Roskams T, Cheng Y, Dubuquoy L, Podevin P, Conti F, Canva V, Philippe D, Gambiez L, Mathurin P, Paris JC, Schoonjans K, Calmus Y, Pol S, Auwerx J, Desreumaux P. Impaired expression of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha during hepatitis C virus infection. Gastroenterology. 2005 Feb;128(2):334-42. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Zylberberg H, Rimaniol AC, Pol S, Masson A, De Groote D, Berthelot P, Bach JF, Bréchot C, Zavala F. Soluble tumor necrosis factor receptors in chronic hepatitis C: a correlation with histological fibrosis and activity. J Hepatol. 1999 Feb;30(2):185-91. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Sasaki R, Devhare PB, Steele R, Ray R, Ray RB. Hepatitis C virus-induced CCL5 secretion from macrophages activates hepatic stellate cells. Hepatology. 2017 Sep;66(3):746-757. Epub 2017 Jul 18. PMCID: PMC5570659. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Fartoux L, Chazouillères O, Wendum D, Poupon R, Serfaty L. Impact of steatosis on progression of fibrosis in patients with mild hepatitis C. Hepatology. 2005 Jan;41(1):82-7. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Ohata K, Hamasaki K, Toriyama K, Matsumoto K, Saeki A, Yanagi K, Abiru S, Nakagawa Y, Shigeno M, Miyazoe S, Ichikawa T, Ishikawa H, Nakao K, Eguchi K. Hepatic steatosis is a risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Cancer. 2003 Jun 15;97(12):3036-43. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Poynard T, Ratziu V, McHutchison J, Manns M, Goodman Z, Zeuzem S, Younossi Z, Albrecht J. Effect of treatment with peginterferon or interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin on steatosis in patients infected with hepatitis C. Hepatology. 2003 Jul;38(1):75-85. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Adinolfi LE, Restivo L, Zampino R, Guerrera B, Lonardo A, Ruggiero L, Riello F, Loria P, Florio A. Chronic HCV infection is a risk of atherosclerosis. Role of HCV and HCV-related steatosis. Atherosclerosis. 2012;221:496–502. [CrossRef]
  108. Rau M, Buggisch P, Mauss S, Boeker KHW, Klinker H, Müller T, Stoehr A, Schattenberg JM, Geier A. Prognostic impact of steatosis in the clinical course of chronic HCV infection-Results from the German Hepatitis C-Registry. PLoS One. 2022 Jun 16;17(6):e0264741. PMCID: PMC9203066. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Krassenburg LAP, Maan R, Ramji A, Manns MP, Cornberg M, Wedemeyer H, de Knegt RJ, Hansen BE, Janssen HLA, de Man RA, Feld JJ, van der Meer AJ. Clinical outcomes following DAA therapy in patients with HCV-related cirrhosis depend on disease severity. J Hepatol. 2021 May;74(5):1053-1063. Epub 2020 Nov 23. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Do A, Esserman DA, Krishnan S, Lim JK, Taddei TH, Hauser RG 3rd, Tate JP, Re VL 3rd, Justice AC. Excess weight gain after cure of hepatitis C infection with direct-acting antivirals. J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Jul;35(7):2025-2034. Epub 2020 Apr 27. Erratum in: J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Oct;35(10):3140. PMCID: PMC7352003. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Tomasiewicz K, Flisiak R, Jaroszewicz J, Małkowski P, Pawłowska M, Piekarska A, Simon K, Zarębska-Michaluk D. Recommendations of the Polish group of experts for HCV for the treatment of hepatitis C in 2023. Clin Exp Hepatol. 2023 Mar;9(1):1-8. Epub 2023 Mar 24. PMCID: PMC10090994. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Sun D, Dai M, Shen S, Li C, Yan X. Analysis of naturally occurring resistance-associated variants to NS3/4A protein inhibitors, NS5A protein inhibitors, and NS5B polymerase inhibitors in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Gene Expr. 2018 Mar 21;18(1):63-69. Epub 2017 Dec 8. PMCID: PMC5885147. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Harrison SA, Brunt EM, Qazi RA, Oliver DA, Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Di Bisceglie AM, Bacon BR. Effect of significant histologic steatosis or steatohepatitis on response to antiviral therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005 Jun;3(6):604-9. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Malaguarnera M, Vacante M, Russo C, Gargante MP, Giordano M, Bertino G, Neri S, Malaguarnera M, Galvano F, Li Volti G. Rosuvastatin reduces nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in patients with chronic hepatitis C treated with α-interferon and ribavirin: Rosuvastatin reduces NAFLD in HCV patients. Hepat Mon. 2011 Feb;11(2):92-8. PMCID: PMC3206670. [PubMed]
  115. Look MP, Gerard A, Rao GS, Sudhop T, Fischer HP, Sauerbruch T, Spengler U. Interferon/antioxidant combination therapy for chronic hepatitis C--a controlled pilot trial. Antiviral Res. 1999 Sep;43(2):113-22. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Houglum K, Venkataramani A, Lyche K, Chojkier M. A pilot study of the effects of d-alpha-tocopherol on hepatic stellate cell activation in chronic hepatitis C. Gastroenterology. 1997 Oct;113(4):1069-73. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Rout G, Nayak B, Patel AH, Gunjan D, Singh V, Kedia S, Shalimar. Therapy with oral directly acting agents in hepatitis C infection is associated with reduction in fibrosis and increase in hepatic steatosis on transient elastography. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2019 Mar-Apr;9(2):207-214. Epub 2018 Jun 21. PMCID: PMC6477071. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Sun HY, Cheng PN, Tseng CY, Tsai WJ, Chiu YC, Young KC. Favouring modulation of circulating lipoproteins and lipid loading capacity by direct antiviral agents grazoprevir/elbasvir or ledipasvir/sofosbuvir treatment against chronic HCV infection. Gut. 2018 Jul;67(7):1342-1350. Epub 2017 Jun 14. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Hum J, Jou JH, Green PK, Berry K, Lundblad J, Hettinger BD, Chang M, Ioannou GN. Improvement in glycemic control of type 2 diabetes after successful treatment of hepatitis C virus. Diabetes Care. 2017 Sep;40(9):1173-1180. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Butt AA, Yan P, Shuaib A, Abou-Samra AB, Shaikh OS, Freiberg MS. Direct-acting antiviral therapy for HCV infection is associated with a reduced risk of cardiovascular disease events. Gastroenterology. 2019 Mar;156(4):987-996.e8. Epub 2018 Nov 13. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Bhattacharya D, Aronsohn A, Price J, Lo Re V; AASLD-IDSA HCV Guidance Panel. Hepatitis C Guidance 2023 Update: AASLD-IDSA recommendations for testing, managing, and treating hepatitis C virus infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2023 May 25:ciad319. Epub ahead of print. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Tao X, Chen L, Zhao Y, Liu Y, Shi R, Jiang B, Mi Y, Xu L. A novel noninvasive diagnostic model of HBV-related inflammation in chronic hepatitis B virus infection patients with concurrent nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Mar 23;9:862879. PMCID: PMC8984271. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Zhang J, Lin S, Jiang D, Li M, Chen Y, Li J, Fan J. Chronic hepatitis B and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: Conspirators or competitors? Liver Int. 2020 Mar;40(3):496-508. Epub 2020 Jan 13. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Shaheen AA, AlMattooq M, Yazdanfar S, Burak KW, Swain MG, Congly SE, Borman MA, Lee SS, Myers RP, Coffin CS. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate significantly decreases serum lipoprotein levels compared with entecavir nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy in chronic hepatitis B carriers. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Sep;46(6):599-604. Epub 2017 Jul 13. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Chang FM, Wang YP, Lang HC, Tsai CF, Hou MC, Lee FY, Lu CL. Statins decrease the risk of decompensation in hepatitis B virus- and hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis: A population-based study. Hepatology. 2017 Sep;66(3):896-907. Epub 2017 May 8. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Simon TG, Duberg AS, Aleman S, Hagstrom H, Nguyen LH, Khalili H, Chung RT, Ludvigsson JF. Lipophilic statins and risk for hepatocellular carcinoma and death in patients with chronic viral hepatitis: results from a nationwide Swedish population. Ann Intern Med. 2019 Sep 3;171(5):318-327. Epub 2019 Aug 20. PMCID: PMC8246628. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Bar-Yishay I, Shaul Y, Shlomai A. Hepatocyte metabolic signaling pathways and regulation of hepatitis B virus expression. Liver Int. 2011 Mar;31(3):282-90. Epub 2011 Jan 11. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Wang X, Xie Q. Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) and viral hepatitis. J Clin Transl Hepatol. 2022 Feb 28;10(1):128-133. Epub 2021 Oct 8. PMCID: PMC8845159. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 2.  
Figure 2.  
Preprints 90341 g002
Table 1. Metabolic and non-metabolic complications of MAFLD co-existing with CHB49-54.
Table 1. Metabolic and non-metabolic complications of MAFLD co-existing with CHB49-54.
Metabolic complications
Insulin Resistance
Dyslipidemia – elevated triglyceride and LDL cholesterol levels
Obesity
Hypertension
Cardiovascular disease
Non-metabolic Complications
Hepatic fibrosis
Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)
Chronic liver disease-related complications - ascites, encephalopathy, and variceal bleeding
Increased risk of infection
Quality of life - fatigue, discomfort, and the need for ongoing medical care
Table 2. Comparison of disease characteristics between various genotypes of hepatitis C with regards to the cause of hepatic steatosis and responsiveness to the antiviral therapy85.
Table 2. Comparison of disease characteristics between various genotypes of hepatitis C with regards to the cause of hepatic steatosis and responsiveness to the antiviral therapy85.
Genotype 3 HCV Non-Genotype 3 HCV
Mechanism of steatosis Viral steatosis Metabolic steatosis
Location Periportal zone (acinar 1) Centrilobular (acinar 3)
HCV RNA viral load Co-relate with MAFLD severity No relation with MAFLD severity
Response to Antiviral MAFLD reversible with SVR Reduced response to therapy
Consequence High rate of steatosis, more rapid progression to advanced fibrosis, and increased HCC risk Lower rates of steatosis, slower progression to advanced fibrosis, and lower HCC risk
Table 3. Summary of the interactions between chronic viral hepatitis and MAFLD128.
Table 3. Summary of the interactions between chronic viral hepatitis and MAFLD128.
HBV HCV
CHB/CHC promoting fatty liver No Yes
CHB/CHC predisposing to diabetes Unknown Yes
CHB/CHC worsening lipid profile No No
MAFLD promoting CHB/CHC related fibrosis Yes Yes
MAFLD promoting CHB/CHC related HCC Yes Yes
MAFLD promoting viral replication No Yes
MAFLD reducing the antiviral response Unknown IFN-α: Yes
DAAs: unknown
Drugs for diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidemia reducing the antiviral response Unknown IFN-α: unknown
Some DAAs: Yes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated