Submitted:
24 October 2023
Posted:
25 October 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
- -
- Diagnostics based on permittivity measurements such as MW differential tomography, UWB radar technology, and MW radiometers;
- -
- Part of the medical equipment, for example microwave technology as the basis of the linear accelerator;
- -
- Therapy, mostly so-called thermal effects are being used.
- -
- Diathermia: this means mild heating up to a maximum of 41°C, e.g. in physiotherapy. The therapeutic effect is based on the principle of heating biological tissue, usually only up to 41 °C. It is used to treat pain in certain rheumatic and degenerative diseases and to treat chronic inflammation resistant to antibiotics, often in rehabilitation and physiotherapy;
- -
- Hyperthermia: clinically mostly used in oncology, which means increasing the temperature in the tumour area up to 41–45°C. The biological principle exploits the fact that certain tumour cells are very sensitive to temperatures above 41°C, while normal cells generally survive elevated temperatures up to 45°C. Heating the tumour region to temperatures of 41-45°C can therefore selectively destroy tumour cells;
- -
- Thermoablation: this means raising the temperature above 45°C. It is used, for example, in urology for the treatment of BPH and in cardiology for the treatment of fibrillation and/or arrhythmia;
- -
- Thermocoagulation - heating to temperatures much higher than 45 °C, usually around 70 °C. An example is MW treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH), which can replace complicated surgery.
- -
- The frequency of the wave, which determines the EM wavelength and the penetration depth;
- -
- The spatial distribution of the biological tissue in the irradiated volume;
- -
- The dielectric and thermal characteristics of each tissue type in a given area;
- -
- Blood flow in the treated area.
2. Experimental set-up and method
2.1. Microwave and Radiofrequency Generators, Control Circuit and Probes
2.1.1. Microwave Generator
2.1.2. Radiofrequency Generator
2.1.3. Hybrid Microwaves and Radiofrequency Generator
2.1.4. Radiofrequency and Microwave Probes
2.2. Experimental Method
3. Results and Discussion
4. Conclusion
References
- Decareau, R.; Teterson, R. Microwave Processing and Engineering; Ellis Horwood: Chicester, England, 1986. [Google Scholar]
- David Vrba, Jan Vrba, Ondrej Fiser, Jesus Cumana, Milan Babak, Jan Vrba Senior. Applications of Microwaves in Medicine and Biology. [CrossRef]
- G. Carrafiello, D. Laganà, M. Mangini, et al. Microwave tumors ablation: principles, clinical applications and review of preliminary experiences. International journal of surgery, London, England, vol. 6, Suppl 1, p. 65-69, Dec. 2008. [CrossRef]
- D.K. Filippiadis, S. Yevich, F. Deschamps, J.W. Jennings, S. Tutton, A. Kelekis “The Role of Ablation in Cancer Pain Relief.” Current oncology reports. 2019, 21, 105. [CrossRef]
- W. Wisser, C. Khanzen, E. Deviatko, et al. “Microwave and radiofrequency ablation yield similar success rates for treatment of chronic atrial fibrillation.”, European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery: official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery. 2004, 25, 1011–1017. [CrossRef]
- J. Reis, Y. Chang, A.K. Sharma “Radiofrequency ablation vs microwave ablation for osteoid osteomas: long-term results.”, Skeletal radiology. 2020, 49, 1995–2000. [CrossRef]
- L. Bennardo, I. Fusco, C. Cuciti, et al. “Microwave Therapy for Cellulite: An Effective Non-Invasive Treatment.”, Journal of clinical medicine. 2022, 11, 515. [CrossRef]
- S.J. Goodyear, I.K. Nyamekye “Radiofrequency ablation of varicose veins: Best practice techniques and evidence.”, Phlebology. 2015, 30, 9–17. [CrossRef]
- F. Izzo, V. Granata, R. Grassi, et al. “Radiofrequency Ablation and Microwave Ablation in Liver Tumors: An Update.”, The oncologist. 2019, 24, 990–1005. [CrossRef]
- D.I. Rosenthal, A. Alexander, A.E. Rosenberg, A.D. Springfield “Ablation of osteoid osteomas with a percutaneously placed electrode: a new procedure.”, Radiology. 1992, 183, 29–33. [CrossRef]
- D.E. Dupuy, R.J. Zagoria, W. Akerley, W.W. Mayo-Smith, P.V. Kavanagh, H. Safran “Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of malignancies in the lung.”, AJR. American journal of roentgenology. 2000, 174, 57–59. [CrossRef]
- K. Suwa, T. Seki, K. Aoi, et al. “Efficacy of microwave ablation versus radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score analysis.”, Abdominal radiology, New York. 2021, 46, 3790–3797. [CrossRef]
- H. Rathke, B. Hamm, F. Güttler, et al. “Comparison of four radiofrequency ablation systems at two target volumes in an ex vivo bovine liver model.”, Diagnostic and interventional radiology, Ankara, Turkey. 2014, 20, 251–258. [CrossRef]
- A. Pfannenstiel, J. Iannuccilli, F.H. Cornelis, D.E. Dupuy, W.L. Beard, P. Prakash “Shaping the future of microwave tumor ablation: a new direction in precision and control of device performance.”, International journal of hyperthermia: the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group. 2022, 39, 664–674. [CrossRef]
- Y. Mohtashami, H. Luyen, J. F. Sawicki, et al., "Tools for Attacking Tumors: Performance Comparison of Triaxial, Choke Dipole, and Balun-Free Base-Fed Monopole Antennas for Microwave Ablation," IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine. 2018, 60, 52–57. [CrossRef]
- N. Molitor, E. Yalcinkaya,A. Auricchio, et al. “Swiss National Registry on Catheter Ablation Procedures: Changing Trends over the Last 20 Years.”, Journal of clinical medicine, Basel, Switzerland. 2021, 10, 3021. [CrossRef]
- J. Criado, A. Quesada, R. Cózar, “18th Official Report of the Spanish Society of Cardiology Working Group on Electrophysiology and Arrhythmias (2018).”, Revista Española de Cardiología, Alicante, Spain. 2019, 72, 1031–1042.
- T. Hunter, S. Palli, J. Rizzo, “Cost comparison of radiofrequency catheter ablation versus cryoablation for atrial fibrillation in hospitals using both technologies.”, Journal of medical economics. 2016, 19, 959–964. [CrossRef]
- H. Takahashi, B. Kahramangil, E. Berber, “Local recurrence after microwave thermosphere ablation of malignant liver tumors: results of a surgical series.”, Surgery. 2017, 163, 709–713. [CrossRef]
- P. Donlon, M. Dennedy, “Thermal ablation in adrenal disorders: a discussion of the technology, the clinical evidence and the future.”, Current Opinion in endocrinology, diabetes and obesity. 2021, 28, 291–302. [CrossRef]
- M. Eckmann, M. Martinez, S. Lindauer, et al., “Radiofrequency ablation near the bone-muscle interface alters soft tissue lesion dimensions.”, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine. 2015, 40, 270–275. [CrossRef]
- P. Afaghi, M. Lapolla, K. Ghandi, “Percutaneous microwave ablation applications for liver tumors: recommendations for COVID-19 patients.” Heliyon, 2021, 7. [CrossRef]









| Frequency band | Central frequency | Wavelength in air |
World regions covereda |
|---|---|---|---|
| 433.05 – 434.79 MHz | 433.92 MHz | 0.69 m | R1 |
| 902 – 928 MHz | 915 MHz | 0.33 m | R2 + some exceptions |
| 2400 – 2500 MHz | 2450 MHz | 0.12 m | R1, R2, R3 |
| 5725 – 5875 MHz | 5800 MHz | 0.05 m | R1, R2, R3 |
| 24 – 24.25 GHz | 24.125 GHz | 1.24 cm | R1, R2, R3 |
| 61 – 61.5 GHz | 61.25 GHz | 0.49 cm | Subject to local acceptance |
| 122 – 123 GHz | 122.5 GHz | 0.24 cm | Subject to local acceptance |
| 244 – 246 GHz | 245 GHz | 0.12 cm | Subject to local acceptance |
| Microwave energy - chicken breast | |||
| Max Power [W] | Size A [mm] | Size B [mm] | Roundness Index |
| 50 100 150 200 250 |
20 33 37 48 50 |
18 30 32 43 45 |
0,90 0,91 0,86 0,89 0,90 |
| Microwave energy - bovine liver | |||
| Max Power [W] | Size A [mm] | Size B [mm] | Roundness Index |
| 50 100 150 200 250 |
18 32 35 40 42 |
15 25 28 33 35 |
0,83 0,78 0,8 0,83 0,83 |
| Radiofrequency energy - chicken breast | |||
| Max Power [W] | Size A [mm] | Size B [mm] | Roundness Index |
| 10 | 22 | 12 | 0,55 |
| 20 30 40 50 |
24 25 30 32 |
13 15 17 19 |
0,54 0,60 0,57 0,59 |
| Radiofrequency energy - bovine liver | |||
| Max Power [W] | Size A [mm] | Size B [mm] | Roundness Index |
| 10 | 20 | 12 | 0,60 |
| 20 30 40 50 |
22 24 27 30 |
12 14 15 17 |
0,55 0,58 0,55 0,57 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).